Factors associated with delayed time to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage iii colon cancer

Similar documents
Retrospective analysis of the effect of CAPOX and mfolfox6 dose intensity on survival in colorectal patients in the adjuvant setting

Adjuvant therapies for large bowel cancer Wasantha Rathnayake, MD

Current Status of Adjuvant Therapy for Colorectal Cancer

Age and factors associated with access and time to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer: a French epidemiological study

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer: Are we making progress?

The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy study: implications for clinical practice

/m 2 Oxaliplatin 85 1 Q2W 1-3 Leucovorin Q2W 5-FU Q2W 5-FU Q2W

Stage III Colon Cancer Susquehanna Cancer Center Warren L Robinson, MD, FACP May 9, 2007

PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER CENTRE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES

Is There a New Standard of Care for Adjuvant Therapy in Colon Cancer? When is 3 Months Enough?

Northwestern University, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Key Words. Colon cancer Stage II Adjuvant chemotherapy

療指引 34 Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer

Pharmaco-economic analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colorectal cancer

S u p p o r t e d b y a n i n d e p e n d e n t E d u c a t i o n a l G r a n t f r o m B a y e r

Adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer: timing of initiation and optimal duration

Comparative Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Dukes B Versus Dukes C Colon Cancer: Results From

Adjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in patients over 65 years with early stage colorectal carcinoma

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Colon Carcinoma

Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Update

Radiotherapy and Conservative Surgery For Merkel Cell Carcinoma - The British Columbia Cancer Agency Experience

Surgical Management of Advanced Stage Colon Cancer. Nathan Huber, MD 6/11/14

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Economic Guidance Report Irinotecan liposome (Onivyde) for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer January 5, 2018

EARLY STAGE COLON CANCER

Comparative Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Colon Cancer Patients

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Resected Dukes C and High-risk B2 Colon Cancer with Fluorouracil and Levamisole

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Modified De Gramont and Modified FOLFOX4 Regimens for Adjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

大腸直腸癌 抗癌藥物治療指引 討論日期 團隊討論 : 105 年 10 月 19 日 三院討論 : 105 年 12 月 7 日 團隊確認 : 106 年 1 月 25 日 核備日期 : 106 年 4 月 18 日

Randomized phase III trial of treatment duration for oral uracil and tegafur plus

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Joanne Chiu 1, Vikki Tang 1, Roland Leung 1, Hilda Wong 1, Kin Wah Chu 2, Jensen Poon 3, Richard J Epstein 4, Thomas Yau 1,3,5 *

Preoperative or Postoperative Therapy for the Management of Patients with Stage II or III Rectal Cancer

Research Article The Aetiology of Delay to Commencement of Adjuvant Chemotherapy following Colorectal Resection

Reference No: Author(s) Approval date: 12/05/16. Committee. June Operational Date: Review:

Disclosures. Clinical and molecular features to guide adjuvant therapy. Personalized Medicine - Decision Tools -

Efficiency and tolerability of 5- fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with colorectal carcinoma

Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Curatively Resected Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

Management of Advanced Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients

Long term survival study of de-novo metastatic breast cancers with or without primary tumor resection

Radiation Therapy for Resectable Colon Cancer

Study population The study population comprised patients with completely resected Stage III colon cancer.

A clinical study of adjuvant chemotherapy in younger and elder rectal cancer patientsa

Jonathan Dickinson, LCL Xeloda

Oncologic Outcomes of Stage IIIA Colon Cancer for Different Chemotherapeutic Regimens

DETERMINATION OF OXALIPLATIN DOSE IN ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY : VALIDATION OF A DEDICATED SOFTWARE BASED ON INITIAL CT SCAN

Chemotherapy for resectable liver mets: Options and Issues. Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA

Case Conference. Craig Morgenthal Department of Surgery Long Island College Hospital

MEETING SUMMARY ESMO 2018, Munich, Germany. Dr. Jenny Seligmann University of Leeds, UK HIGHLIGHTS ON COLORECTAL CANCER

Carcinoma del retto: Highlights

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY...

COLON CANCER FOLLOW UP GUIDELINES

Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: which treatment in 2005?

A Population-Based Study on the Uptake and Utilization of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for Brain Metastasis in Nova Scotia

Advances in gastric cancer: How to approach localised disease?

Adjuvant therapy in older adults: controversies and challenges - Colorectal cancer -

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Neoplasms Commons

Inadequate lymph node sampling as a risk factor in stage II colon cancer

Peritoneal Involvement in Stage II Colon Cancer

Chemotherapy of colon cancers

Weekly 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: achieving lower toxicity with higher dose-intensity in adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer resection

Adjuvant treatment Colon Cancer

Adjuvant/neoadjuvant systemic treatment of colorectal cancer

Reference No: Author(s) 12/05/16. Approval date: committee. June Operational Date: Review:

THE VALIDITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DATA AND PATTERNS OF CHEMOTHERAPY USE AMONG ELDERLY COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS. Jennifer L.

ESMO 2017, Madrid, Spain Dr. Loredana Vecchione Charite Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin HIGHLIGHTS ON CANCERS OF THE UPPER GI TRACT

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Van Cutsem E et al. Proc ASCO 2009;Abstract LBA4509.

A Systematic Review on Economic Evaluation of Oxaliplatin Added Regimens as the Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Colon Cancer

RECTAL CANCER CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION

Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Patterns of Chemotherapy and Biologic Therapy Use in US Medical Oncology Practice

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Medicinae Doctoris. One university. Many futures.

Cetuximab plus 5-FU/FA/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a large-scale Phase II study (OPUS)

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Study Period: Objectives: Indication: Study Investigators/Centers: Research Methods: Data Source

The impact of operation center and the prognostic factors on the outcome of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer

How Old is Too Old for Chemotherapy in Early C olon Colon Cancer: Role of Geriatric Assessments Winson Y. Cheung, MD, MPH, FRCPC

trial update clinical

Adjuvant Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer in 2009: Where Are We? Highlights from the 45 th ASCO Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL, USA. May 29 - June 2, 2009

Long Term Outcomes of Preoperative versus

Disclosures. Colorectal Cancer Update GAFP November Risk Assessment. Colon and Rectal Cancer The Challenge. Issues in Colon and Rectal Cancer

Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin as Adjuvant Treatment for Colon Cancer

Pharmacologyonline 1: (2010)

4.3 Input parameters Patient

Terapia neoadyuvante en cáncer de recto Estado del arte Mauricio Lema Medina MD Clínica de Oncología Astorga / Clínica SOMA - Medellín, Colombia

Adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer

ADJUVANT AND NEOADJUVANT MANAGEMENT OF COLORECTAL CANCER

Outcome of rectal cancer after radiotherapy with a long or short waiting period before surgery, a descriptive clinical study

Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: Prognostic and Predictive Markers

Inequity in access to guideline-recommended colorectal cancer treatment in Nova Scotia, Canada

JK Coller, S Korver, IA Ball, RJ Gibson, J Tuke, RM Logan, AM Richards, KR Mead, CS Karapetis, DM Keefe and JM Bowen

Exploring and Validating Surrogate Endpoints in Colorectal Cancer. Center, Pittsburgh, USA

Resectable locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer

The effect of surgeon volume on procedure selection in non-small cell lung cancer surgeries. Dr. Christian Finley MD MPH FRCSC McMaster University

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

* * * * Supplementary Figure 1. DS Lv CK HSA CK HSA. CK Col-3. CK Col-3. See overleaf for figure legend. Cancer cells

Patterns of HIV testing among Ontario physicians, 2006

Appendix E - Summary form Oxaliplatin and capecitabine for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer table of consultee comments

The effect of immune conditions on pesticide use and the risk of non- Hodgkin lymphoma. Manisha Pahwa, OCRC CARWH Conference June 2, 2012

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY. Helen Mari Parsons

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Transcription:

Curr Oncol, Vol. 21, pp. 181-186 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1963 DELAYED TIME TO ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY ORIGINAL ARTICLE Factors associated with delayed time to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage iii colon cancer A. Chan md,* R. Woods ms,* H. Kennecke md,* and S. Gill md mph* ABSTRACT Background Adjuvant chemotherapy started more than 56 days after colon cancer resection has been associated with lesser overall survival among patients with stage iii colon cancer. The objective of the present population-based study was to determine, in referred patients with resected stage iii colon cancer, factors associated with delayed time to adjuvant chemotherapy (ttac), defined as more than 56 days from the date of surgery. Methods Eligible patients had been diagnosed with stage iii colon cancer and had received at least 1 cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy at one of the four regional cancer treatment sites during 2008 2009. Prognostic and treatment information was prospectively collected through the BC Cancer Agency s GI Cancers Outcomes Unit, and Charlson comorbidity score was retrospectively determined by chart review. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to measure associations between the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and select prognostic and treatment variables. Results Median ttac from surgery for the 395 included patients was 58 days, with 54% of the patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy beyond the recommended 56 days. On multivariate analysis, only treatment at the highest-volume site was independently associated with delayed ttac. Comorbidity index, age, performance status, T stage, tumour location, and oral chemotherapy (compared with intravenous) were not independently associated with delayed ttac. Delays were observed during each interval associated with the patient s transition from surgery to first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions More than half the patients failed to receive adjuvant chemotherapy within the recommended ttac of 56 days. Delayed ttac was associated with processrelated delays rather than with patient- or diseaserelated factors. Efforts to improve timely referral, triage of consultations, and chemotherapy wait lists are required. KEY WORDS Colon cancer, stage iii, delay, adjuvant therapy 1. INTRODUCTION Colon cancer is responsible for 8900 deaths annually in Canada and represents the 2nd most common cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality 1. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stage iii colon cancer has been shown to significantly lower recurrence rates and to improve overall survival 2. The current standard of treatment includes 5-fluorouracil (5fu) based chemotherapy with any of 5fu leucovorin 3,4, 5fu oxaliplatin 5,6, and capecitabine 7. In clinical trials, adjuvant chemotherapy is typically initiated within 6 8 weeks after surgery, but it has been shown that, outside of the clinical trial setting, up to 19% of patients do not receive adjuvant therapy within that period 8. Several recent metaanalyses have confirmed that delayed administration of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery is associated with significantly lesser overall survival 9,10. In the present study, we used a contemporary population-based patient cohort in the province of British Columbia to ascertain the temporal factors and patient characteristics associated with delayed delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy in referred patients with resected stage iii colon cancer. 181

CHAN et al. 2. METHODS 2.1 Data Source Patients with resected stage iii colon cancer who were referred to the BC Cancer Agency (bcca) were identified in the GI Cancers Outcomes Unit database. The bcca is a provincial cancer agency responsible for treatment policy and funding of all systemic therapy in a province of 4.4 million. Of all patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer, 65% are referred to one of five treatment centres. Data relating to receipt of chemotherapy is captured in the provincial pharmacy database. For the purposes of the present analysis, two of the cancer centres were considered together ( centre C ) because of low patient volumes at the most newly opened cancer centre. Provincial treatment guidelines during the study period recommended that adjuvant chemotherapy be initiated within 8 weeks of definitive surgery. For eligible patients with stage iii colon cancer, the recommended regimen is 6 months of modified folfox6 (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin); adjuvant capecitabine is recommended for patients deemed to be ineligible for folfox6. 2.2 Patient Selection Patients with resected stage iii colon cancer referred to the bcca between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, and treated with at least 1 cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy were included. Patients were excluded if they had previously been diagnosed with a colon cancer, if any portion of their colon cancer treatment (including surgery or chemotherapy) was performed outside of British Columbia, or if the referral was for a second opinion. The study was approved by the University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board. 2.3 Data Collection Patient data collected included age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ecog) performance status (as reported by the treating physician at consultation), type of chemotherapy, and regional treatment centre. Disease factor data including tumour location, T stage, N stage, histology, and grade were abstracted from the GI Cancers Outcomes Unit database. Comorbidities, scored using the Charlson comorbidity index, were determined from a retrospective chart review. The time from curative surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (ttac) was recorded, as were the intervals between the times of surgery, hospital discharge, referral to bcca, first medical oncology consultation, and first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy. Delayed ttac was defined as initiation of chemotherapy more than 56 days after surgery. 2.4 Statistical Analysis Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess differences in characteristics and time intervals for patients who received delayed and timely adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was used to investigate independent patient and tumour characteristics predictive of delayed chemotherapy. 3. RESULTS Of 395 referred patients with resected stage iii colon cancer who met the inclusion criteria over the 2-year study period, 54% also met the definition for delayed ttac. Median time from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy was 58 days. Table i presents the characteristics of the full cohort and of the timely and delayed therapy groups. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years, and 52% of patients were men. By entry criteria, all patients had node-positive disease (63%, N1 disease; the remainder, N2 disease). Most patients had T3 tumours located in the proximal colon. No significant differences in age or sex were observed between the timely and delayed chemotherapy groups. Also, no significant differences were observed in nodal status, tumour stage, or location of the primary tumour. Oral adjuvant capecitabine was given to 40% of the patients, but the proportion of patients receiving oral capecitabine compared with intravenous folfox6 was not different between the delayed and timely groups. Most patients had a Charlson comorbidity index of 0 1 and an ecog performance of 0 1. On univariate analysis (Table i), an ecog performance status of 2 or more was associated with a significant delay in adjuvant chemotherapy; a higher score on the Charlson comorbidity index was not. However, in multivariate analysis (Table ii), performance status did not retain a significant association with delayed chemotherapy (p = 0.079). Patients were well distributed across health regions, with the most urban centre (centre A) receiving the highest percentage of referrals overall. Compared with the other centres, centre A had a significantly higher proportion of patients who received delayed chemotherapy, and centre was the only factor to retain significance in the multivariate analysis ( p = 0.0004). The most common sequence of events was surgery, hospital discharge, referral to bcca, medical oncology consultation, and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. That sequence occurred in 69% of cases. As seen in Table iii, significant temporal differences between the timely and delayed chemotherapy groups were identified in all intervals. Overall, the average time from surgery to referral was 15 days; from referral to medical oncology consultation, 21 days; and from medical oncology consultation to initiation of chemotherapy, 20 days. All of those intervals were 182

DELAYED TIME TO ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY table i Patient and tumour characteristics by time to adjuvant chemotherapy Variable Time to adjuvant chemotherapy p Value a Overall 56 Days >56 Days Patients (n) 395 182 213 Age at diagnosis (years) Median 65 66 65 0.8119 Interquartile range 57 72 57 72 58 72 Sex [n (%)] Women 188 (48) 92 (50) 96 (45) 0.2771 Men 207 (52) 90 (50) 117 (55) N Stage [n (%)] N1 249 (63) 119 (65) 130 (61) 0.3718 N2 146 (37) 63 (35) 83 (39) Pathologic T stage [n (%)] T1/2 49 (12) 24 (13) 25 (12) 0.2370 T3 276 (70) 132 (73) 144 (68) T4 68 (17) 25 (14) 43 (20) TX 2 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1) Tumour location [n (%)] Proximal 226 (57) 103 (57) 123 (58) 0.7755 Distal 168 (43) 79 (43) 89 (42) Colon nos 1 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) cci score [n (%)] 0 287 (73) 128 (70) 159 (75) 0.5802 1 72 (18) 35 (19) 37 (17) 2 29 (7) 16 (9) 13 (6) 3 5 (1) 2 (1) 3 (1) 4 2 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1) Unknown 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) ecog ps [n (%)] 0 101 (26) 44 (24) 57 (27) 0.0257 1 93 (24) 49 (27) 44 (21) 2 22 (6) 5 (3) 17 (8) 3 1 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) Unknown 178 (45) 84 (46) 94 (44) Centre [n (%)] A 124 (31) 42 (23) 82 (39) 0.0002 B 79 (20) 31 (17) 48 (23) C 110 (28) 58 (32) 52 (24) D 82 (21) 51 (28) 31 (15) Chemotherapy type [n (%)] Intravenous 5fu ± oxaliplatin 235 (60) 104 (57) 131 (62) 0.3790 Oral capecitabine monotherapy 160 (40) 78 (43) 82 (39) a Unknown, TX, and colon nos were removed before statistical testing was performed. Scores of 2 or 3 on the ecog ps and scores 2, 3, or 4 on the cci were pooled for statistical testing. nos = not otherwise specified; cci = Charlson comorbidity index; ecog ps = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; 5fu = 5-fluorouracil. 183

CHAN et al. table ii Multivariate model for predictors of delayed adjuvant chemotherapy Variable Type iii p value a Comparison or 95% cl p Value a Age at diagnosis 0.7320 Per year 1 0.97, 1.02 0.7320 Sex 0.2664 Men vs. women 1.27 0.83, 1.95 0.2664 N Stage 0.5219 N2 vs. N1 1.16 0.74, 1.82 0.5219 Pathologic T stage 0.1888 T3 vs. T1/T2 1.04 0.54, 2.02 0.9006 T4 vs. T1/T2 1.76 0.79, 3.93 0.1690 Tumour location 0.6174 Distal vs. proximal 0.9 0.58, 1.38 0.6174 cci score 0.8270 1 vs. 0 0.9 0.52, 1.57 0.7107 2+ vs. 0 0.81 0.39, 1.71 0.5850 ecog ps 0.0789 1 vs. 0 0.8 0.44, 1.46 0.4632 2 and 3 vs. 0 3.47 1.14, 10.51 0.0279 Unknown vs. 0 1.04 0.6, 1.8 0.8990 Centre 0.0004 B vs. A 0.68 0.36, 1.28 0.2269 C vs. A 0.42 0.24, 0.74 0.0027 D vs. A 0.28 0.15, 0.54 0.0001 Chemotherapy type 0.7238 Capecitabine vs. folfox 1.1 0.65, 1.85 0.7238 a The type iii p value column represents the variable s overall contribution to the model; the p value column represents the specific comparison ( Comparison column) involving the variable. or = odds ratio; cl = confidence limits; cci = Charlson comorbidity index; ecog ps = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; folfox = leucovorin 5-fluorouracil oxaliplatin. table iii Differences in process time intervals between timely and delayed adjuvant chemotherapy Variable Time to adjuvant chemotherapy p Value Overall 56 Days >56 Days Surgery to referral (days) (n=370) (n=164) (n=206) Median 15 12 18 <0.0001 Interquartile range 10 22 9 17 12 27 Range 1 106 2 41 1 106 Referral to medical oncology consultation (days) (n=349) (n=156) (n=193) Median 21 17 23 <0.0001 Interquartile range 14 27 12 22 17 31 Range 0 55 0 40 0 55 Medical oncology consultation to chemotherapy (days) (n=395) (n=182) (n=213) Median 20 14 26 <0.0001 Interquartile range 12 28 7 21 15 36 Range 0 121 0 48 0 121 significantly increased in the delayed ttac cohort. On average, the delayed cohort commenced adjuvant chemotherapy 67 days after surgery; the timely cohort started adjuvant chemotherapy an average of 43 days after surgery. 4. DISCUSSION In this population-based analysis examining the factors associated with ttac, more than half the patients referred with resected stage iii colon cancer (54%) received delayed adjuvant chemotherapy. This real-world pattern has previously been reported in the published literature; however, the rates in British Columbia are higher than those reported in other provinces in Canada 8,9. Comparing retrospective studies is difficult, but the proportion of patients with delayed chemotherapy ranges from 26% in Alberta 11 to 32% in Winnipeg 12 and 35% in Saskatchewan 13. Although the definition of delayed chemotherapy varies, most studies have accepted fewer than 56 days as the standard against which to judge delay. In univariate analysis in the present study, poor ecog performance status and treatment at the most 184

DELAYED TIME TO ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY urban cancer centre in the province were the only characteristics significantly associated with delayed chemotherapy. It is not surprising that ecog status might result in delayed initiation of chemotherapy: it represents a functional status that might change, especially in the postoperative period. In contrast to previously published meta-analyses, in which the effect of timing was based on clinical trials, our study had a referred population with relatively poorer ecog scores, highlighting some of the phenotypic differences between trial-eligible and real-world patients. However, a higher score on the Charlson comorbidity index was not associated with delayed treatment. That finding might be explained by the strict criteria defining comorbidities in the Charlson index, which might not significantly change in the perioperative period. On multivariate analysis, treatment at the most urban health centre remained the only significant independent factor associated with delayed chemotherapy. It might be postulated that the difference is a function of centre-specific referral and triage processes, workload and patient volumes, and chemotherapy administration resources. Interestingly, oral compared with intravenous chemotherapy was not associated with timeliness of adjuvant therapy. The reasons for that lack of an association are unclear, but might be related to a confounding effect of patient selection. For example, patients selected to receive capecitabine monotherapy as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage iii disease might have had factors related to patient preference, personal supports, or frailty that were associated with delayed initiation of chemotherapy and yet were not captured in our retrospective analysis. Ultimately, delayed ttac appears to be more process-related than patient-related, with all intervals (surgery to referral, referral to medical oncology consultation, and medical oncology consultation to chemotherapy) being significantly prolonged. Given that logistics factors rather than intrinsic patient factors are driving the delay in chemotherapy, we are encouraged that those factors can be remedied. Our findings highlight the need to address process-related delays at each step, including timely referral, medical oncology consultation triage, and management of chemotherapy wait lists. The referring community has to be educated about the importance of timely referral for adjuvant chemotherapy, which typically can be initiated in the immediate postoperative period. Attempts to reduce chemotherapy wait times also need to be considered, including prioritization for patients requiring curative-intent adjuvant chemotherapy and greater utilization of oral fluoropyrimidine oxaliplatin combinations (xelox, capox), which might mitigate delays related to infusional 5fu therapy and implantation of vascular access devices 14. We acknowledge the limitations associated with the retrospective nature of our study. First, although most patient demographics were prospectively recorded, comorbidities and ecog performance status were retrospectively abstracted in a chart review. We were therefore unable to confirm the ecog performance status in 45% of cases. Whether the presence of those performance status data would have remained a significant patient factor between the timely and delayed chemotherapy groups is unclear. Second, specific dates were not available to calculate time from surgery to medical oncology referral for 20 patients or time from bcca referral to medical oncology consultation appointment for 46 patients. However, those patients represent a very small proportion of the 395 in the cohort, and their missing data are unlikely to have significantly altered the results. 5. SUMMARY More than half the referred patients with stage iii colon cancer attending four B.C. cancer centres experienced delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection. Factors associated with delayed chemotherapy included being treated at the most urban provincial centre. Temporal delays occurred in all intervals (surgery to time of medical oncology consultation to time of chemotherapy initiation). Recognizing that delayed ttac is associated with a detrimental effect on survival, efforts must be made to address the delays, potentially including improved education, referral and triage guidelines, and expanded resources. 6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES The authors report that there are no financial conflicts related to this paper. 7. REFERENCES 1. Canadian Cancer Society s Steering Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2011. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2011. 2. Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS, et al. Levamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1990;322:352 8. 3. Wolmark N, Rockette H, Fisher B, et al. The benefit of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil as postoperative adjuvant therapy for primary colon cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol C-03. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:1879 87. 4. O Connell MJ, Mailliard JA, Kahn MJ, et al. Controlled trial of fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months as postoperative adjuvant therapy for colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:246 50. 5. Andre T, Boni C, Mounedji Boudiaf L, et al. on behalf of the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5- Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer (mosaic) Investigators. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and 185

CHAN et al. leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2343 51. 6. Wolmark N, Wieand S, Kuebler PJ, Colangelo L, O Connell MJ, Yothers G. A phase iii trial comparing fulv to fulv + oxaliplatin in stage ii or iii carcinoma of the colon: survival results of nsabp Protocol C-07 [abstract LBA4005]. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:. [Available online at: http://meeting. ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/26/15_suppl/lba4005; cited May 25, 2014] 7. Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP, et al. Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage iii colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2696 704. 8. Hershman D, Hall MJ, Wang X, et al. Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation after surgery for stage iii colon cancer. Cancer 2006;107:2581 8. 9. Des Guetz G, Nicolas P, Perret GY, Morere JF, Uzzan B. Does delaying adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery for colorectal cancer impair survival? A meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:1049 55. 10. Biagi JJ, Raphael MJ, Mackillop WJ, Kong W, King WD, Booth CM. Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;305:2335 42. 11. Lima IS, Yasui Y, Scarfe A, Winget M. Association between receipt and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival for patients with stage iii colon cancer in Alberta, Canada. Cancer 2011;117:3833 40. 12. Cyaykowski PM, Gill S, Kennecke HF, Gordon VL, Turner D. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage iii colon cancer: does timing matter? Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:1082 9. 13. Ahmed S, Ahmad I, Zhu T, et al. Early discontinuation but not the timing of adjuvant therapy affects survival of patients with high-risk colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53:1432 8. 14. Haller DG, Tabenero J, Maroun J, et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage iii colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1465 71. Correspondence to: Sharlene Gill, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6 E-mail: sgill@bccancer.bc.ca * BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC. 186