The association between anti-müllerian hormone and IVF pregnancy outcomes is influenced by age

Similar documents
Anti-Müllerian hormone testing is useful for individualization of stimulation protocols in oocyte donors

Article Anti-Müllerian hormone: a marker for oocyte quantity, oocyte quality and embryo quality?

lbt lab tests t Conrolled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Dr Soheila Ansaripour

Follicle-stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone ratio as an independent predictor of response to controlled ovarian stimulation

COMPARING AMH, AFC AND FSH FOR PREDICTING HIGH OVARIAN RESPONSE IN WOMEN UNDERGOING ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL

CORRELATIONS BETWEEN ANTI-MÜLLERIAN HORMONE, INHIBIN B, AND ACTIVIN A IN FOLLICULAR FLUID IN IVF/ICSI PATIENTS FOR ASSESSING

Anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictor of pregnancy following IVF

Evaluation of ovarian response prediction according to age and serum AMH levels in IVF cycles: a retrospective analysis

Prognosticating ovarian reserve by the new ovarian response prediction index

Biomarkers for Prediction of Pregnancy Outcome in Fertility Patients. Scott Nelson Muirhead Chair in Obstetrics & Gynaecology

The Significance of Low Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels in Young Women Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization

IVF treatment should not be postponed for patients with high basal FSH concentrations

The meaning of anti-müllerian hormone levels in patients at a high risk of poor ovarian response

Infertility in Women over 35. Alison Jacoby, MD Dept. of Ob/Gyn UCSF

Serum anti-müllerian hormone predicts ovarian response and cycle outcome in IVF patients

Article Evaluation of functional ovarian reserve in 60 patients

Androgen supplementation in women with low functional ovarian reserve

Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as predictor of ovarian reserve

How to supplement hypo-androgenic women correctly

Estradiol Level on Day 2 and Day of Trigger: A Potential Predictor of the IVF-ET Success

JMSCR Vol 06 Issue 09 Page September 2018

Anti-Mullerian Hormone as a Predictive Factor in Assisted Reproductive Technique of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients

Ongoing Pregnancy Rates in Women with Low and Extremely Low AMH Levels. A Multivariate Analysis of 769 Cycles

Association of ovarian reserve with age, BMI and serum FSH level in subfertile women

Clinical Study Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Introduction. Hyun Jong Park, Sang Woo Lyu, Hyun Ha Seok, Tae Ki Yoon, Woo Sik Lee

Serum Estradiol Level as a Predictor of Ovarian Response and Pregnancy Outcome During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in Women from Gaza Strip

Evaluation of Dehydroepiandrosterone Supplementation on Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study

Female Reproductive Physiology. Dr Raelia Lew CREI, FRANZCOG, PhD, MMed, MBBS Fertility Specialist, Melbourne IVF

LOW RESPONDERS. Poor Ovarian Response, Por

Article Anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictor of IVF outcome

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences ENDOCRINE MARKERS AND DECLINE IN REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF WOMEN ABSTRACT

Evidence-based treatment of POR and POF. Ovarian Club X and CoGEN in Asia December 16-17, 2017 Hong Kong

Clinical uses of anti-m ullerian hormone assays: pitfalls and promises

Nomogram to predict the number of oocytes retrieved in controlled ovarian stimulation

Antral follicle count as a predictor of ovarian response

Neil Goodman, MD, FACE

Prognostic factors of ovarian response and IVF outcome in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis Claire GAUCHE-CAZALIS, Chadi YAZBECK

AMH CUT-OFF VALUES FOR PREDICTING OVARIAN RESPONSE IN IVF. Nguyễn Xuân Hợi, MD, PhD Hoàng Văn Hùng MsC, MD

Summary

Ontogeny of the new hypo-androgenic PCOS phenotype

Results and Discussion

Comparison of anti-mullerian hormone and antral follicle count for assessment of ovarian reserve

Serum anti-müllerian hormone and estradiol levels as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction technology cycles

Fertility 101. About SCRC. A Primary Care Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Infertility. Definition of Infertility. Dr.

Serum Anti-müllerian hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and antral follicle count measurement cannot predict pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI cycles

Modified natural cycle IVF and mild IVF: a 10 year Swedish experience

Success Rate of Intra Cytoplasm Sperm Injection (ICSI) among Sudanese Women with Low Serum Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)

The value of anti-müllerian hormone measurement in the long GnRH agonist protocol: association with ovarian response and gonadotrophindose adjustments

Interpreting follicular Progesterone: Late follicular Progesterone to Estradiol ratio is not influenced by protocols or gonadotropins used

IVF (,, ) : (HP-hMG) - (IVF- ET) : GnRH, HP-hMG (HP-hMG )57, (rfsh )140, (Gn)

Understanding Infertility, Evaluations, and Treatment Options

Elena H. Yanushpolsky, M.D., a Shelley Hurwitz, Ph.D., b Eugene Tikh, B.S., c and Catherine Racowsky, Ph.D. a

Individualized treatment based on ovarian reserve markers

Timur Giirgan, M.D.* Bulent Urman, M.D. Hakan Yarali, M.D. Hakan E. Duran, M.D.

The 6 th Scientific Meeting of the Asia Pacific Menopause Federation

INTRODUCTION. Address for correspondence Seok Hyun Kim, M.D. J Korean Med Sci 2008; 23: ISSN DOI: /jkms

Ovarian response in three consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles

ENDOCRINE CHARACTERISTICS OF ART CYCLES

Article Anti-Müllerian hormone: clinical insights into a promising biomarker of ovarian follicular status

Thrombosis during assisted reproduction. Scott Nelson Muirhead Chair in Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Progesterone and clinical outcomes

Personalizing ovarian stimulation for IVF

Optimizing Fertility and Wellness After Cancer. Kat Lin, MD, MSCE

Anti-Müllerian hormone concentration as a biomarker of pregnancy success or failure

Live birth chances in women with extremely low-serum anti-mullerian hormone levels

Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels in the Follicular Fluid of the Preovulatory Follicle: A Predictor for Oocyte Fertilization and Quality of Embryo

Questions. Ultrasound markers of ovarian reserve Modena April 18-19, Your choice is.. Impact study: stop OR tests or Soft catheters??

How to Select an Egg Donor

NICE fertility guidelines. Hemlata Thackare MPhil MSc MRCOG Deputy Medical Director London Women s Clinic

A comparative study between agonist and antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation in art cycles at a rural set up in South Gujarat

Recent Developments in Infertility Treatment

Synchronization between embryo development and endometrium is a contributing factor for rescue ICSI outcome

Age-Specific Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone Concentrations in Infertile Iranian Women

Liyan Duan 1, Shihua Bao 1, Kunming Li 1, Xiaoming Teng 1, Ling Hong 1 and Xiaoyu Zhao 2. Abstract. Introduction

A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval

Increased endometrial thickness is associated with improved treatment outcome for selected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization embryo transfer

Clinical Policy Committee

Influence ovarian stimulation on oocyte and embryo quality. Prof.Dr. Bart CJM Fauser

Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/gnrh antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles

Milder is better? Advantages and disadvantages of "mild" ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization

A simple multivariate score could predict ovarian reserve, as well as pregnancy rate, in infertile women

Association between Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Ovarian Response and Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients

Best practices of ASRM and ESHRE

Tests for ovarian reserve: reliability and utility Thaís S. Domingues a, André M. Rocha a and Paulo C. Serafini a,b

Minimising IVF related mortality and morbidity. Scott Nelson Muirhead Professor in Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Clinical Policy Committee

Timing of Ovulation Induction Matters in Women with Low Functional Ovarian Reserve

In Vitro Fertilization in Clomiphene-Resistant Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

FERTILITY PRESERVATION. Sanghoon Lee & Sinan Ozkavukcu & Elke Heytens & Fred Moy & Rose M. Alappat & Kutluk Oktay

Endometrial Preparation for Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Zitao Liu, MD, PhD New Hope Fertility Center, NY

Puberty and Fertility. Normal Female Puberty PUBERTY! What about girls with Galactosemia? E Puberty and Fertility Badik Spencer 1

Prediction modeling for live birth in in vitro fertilization. Kristen E. Gray. A dissertation. submitted in partial fulfillment of the

Agonist versus antagonist in ICSI cycles: a randomized trial and cost effectiveness analysis Badrawi A, Zaki S, Al-Inany H, Ramzy A M, Hussein M

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

Early follicular anti-mullerian hormone as a predictor of ovarian response during ICSI cycles

The emergence of Personalized Medicine protocols for IVF.

Clinical Study Clinical Effects of a Natural Extract of Urinary Human Menopausal Gonadotrophin in Normogonadotropic Infertile Patients

Age and basal follicle stimulating hormone as predictors of in vitro fertilisation outcome

Transcription:

Reproductive BioMedicine Online (2010) 21, 757 761 www.sciencedirect.com www.rbmonline.com ARTICLE The association between anti-müllerian hormone and IVF pregnancy outcomes is influenced by age Jeff G Wang *, Nataki C Douglas, Gary S Nakhuda, Janet M Choi, Susanna J Park, Melvin H Thornton, Michael M Guarnaccia, Mark V Sauer Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA * Corresponding author. E-mail address: jw781@columbia.edu (JG Wang). Jeff Wang, MD, is an assistant professor of clinical obstetrics and gynaecology in the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility at Columbia University. His current interests include clinical outcomes research in reproductive medicine. Abstract The conflicting results from studies on the predictive capabilities of serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) for IVF pregnancy outcomes may be attributed to small sample sizes and disparities in the age of the study populations. The relationship between AMH and IVF pregnancy outcomes was clarified with retrospective cross-tabulation analyses (n = 1558) stratified by age to control for its confounding effects. Serum AMH concentrations were divided into tertiles (0.29, 0.30 1.20, 1.21 ng/ml) and ages into four groups (<34, 34 37, 38 41, 42 years). For women <34, having serum AMH in the lowest tertile did not reduce the chance of IVF pregnancy/live birth compared with those with higher AMH concentrations. For women 34 41, a significant positive relationship existed between serum AMH and pregnancy rates. For women 42, serum AMH concentrations 0.29 ng/ml were associated with a 3% chance of pregnancy, and women with AMH 1.21 ng/ml had the same pregnancy rate as women with concentrations 0.30 1.20 ng/ml. In conclusion, AMH has limited predictive value for IVF outcomes in the two extremes of female reproductive age; however, for women between 34 and 41, higher serum AMH concentrations are associated with significantly greater chances of pregnancy (P < 0.01). RBMOnline ª 2010, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. KEYWORDS: age, AMH, IVF, MIS, pregnancy Introduction Securing accurate prognostic tests for predicting pregnancy success is essential for counselling patients regarding their individual chances from assisted reproduction technologies and to obviate embarking on expensive medical care if minimal benefit is expected. Determinants of success in assisted reproduction are complex and involve a myriad of interactive host factors ranging from the quantity and the quality of the individual gametes, the receptivity of the uterus and maternal medical conditions that may interfere with implantation. 1472-6483/$ - see front matter ª 2010, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.041

758 JG Wang et al. Presently, numerous quantitative ovarian reserve markers such as serum concentrations of FSH, oestradiol, inhibin B and anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), as well as the antral follicle count and ovarian volume measured by ultrasonography, have been shown to predict ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophin stimulation and the number of oocytes retrieved with reasonable accuracy (Broekmans et al., 2006; McIlveen et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2008). However, clinically available predictors for oocyte quality are still lacking. In their absence, it is not surprising the quantitative ovarian reserve markers alone have limited predictive value for pregnancy and live birth rates, the ultimate outcomes of interest (Broekmans et al., 2006). Within the confines of this incomplete information, many quantitative ovarian reserve markers have been tested for their associations with pregnancy rates with variable results. Specifically, AMH has demonstrated considerable predictive capability in several studies (Barad et al., 2009; Ebner et al., 2006; Eldar-Geva et al., 2005; Kwee et al., 2008; Wunder et al., 2008). However, the results have not been consistent across all studies (Broer et al., 2009; Fanchin et al., 2007; Ficicioglu et al., 2006; Gnoth et al., 2008; Hazout et al., 2004; McIlveen et al., 2007; Penarrubia et al., 2005; Smeenk et al., 2007). Nonetheless, small sample size with inadequate power, disparities in age distribution of the study populations and differences in study design possibly account for many of the inconsistencies. In an attempt to resolve these conflicting findings, a simple model in this study is developed using a large sample size to analyse IVF clinical pregnancy and live birth rates utilizing only AMH as the predictor for quantitative ovarian reserve and patient age as the best available proxy for oocyte quality. It is postulated that a significant relationship exists between AMH and pregnancy outcomes, but its clinical significance may differ by patient age group. Materials and methods From January 2005 to March 2009, 2712 non-donor, fresh IVF cycles performed at the Centre for Women s Reproductive Care at Columbia University with available AMH concentrations were retrospectively identified. The study population consisted of 1558 different couples with the mean female age of 38 ± 4 years (range 22 45). The primary causes of infertility among entered couples included 44% diminished ovarian reserve, 40% male factor infertility, 10% tubal factor, 8% unexplained and 4% endometriosis. Of the 1558 women who initiated the first cycle, 691 (44%) returned for a second cycle. Given this high percentage of second repeat cycles, the first two IVF attempts were included in the study, resulting in a total of 2249 cycles selected for the analysis. The 463 further repeated cycles were excluded from the study to minimize selection bias. Serum AMH was drawn within 3 months prior to ovarian stimulation, independent of menstrual cycle day. Assays were performed at the Centre using a two-site immunoassay from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (Webster, Texas). Ovarian stimulation was carried out using standard IVF protocols. Cycles were cancelled if there were less than three dominant follicles 8 mm at the completion of ovarian stimulation. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed in 56% of the cases either due to previously diagnosed male factor or poor semen sample obtained on the day of oocyte retrieval. Clinical pregnancies were defined by the presence of at least one intrauterine fetal heartbeat 4 5 weeks after oocyte retrieval. For the cross-tabulation analyses, the female patients were stratified by their age and serum AMH concentrations (Table 1). Specifically, the AMH concentrations were divided into low, middle and high tertiles (0.29, 0.30 1.20 and 1.21 ng/ml) and the female age into four groups (<34, 34 37, 38 41 and >42 years). Clinical pregnancy rates in the initial analysis were defined per initiated cycle, including cycles cancelled due to poor response, to provide realistic prognostic information for patients before initiating IVF cycles. In the second analysis, clinical pregnancy rates were defined per oocyte retrieval in order to investigate more accurately the association between quantitative ovarian reserve and oocyte quality. In addition, the associations between serum AMH concentrations and live birth rates per embryo transfer in different age groups were also analysed. For each age group, clinical pregnancy, cycle cancellation and live birth rates were compared across AMH tertiles using logistic regression analysis. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 15.0 (SPSS, USA). This study was exempt from the Columbia University institutional review due to its retrospective nature. Results For women younger than 34 years initiating IVF treatment, having an AMH concentration in the highest tertile (1.21 ng/ml) increased the likelihood of clinical pregnancy Table 1 Patient demographics and IVF cycle parameters. Age groups (years) <34 34 37 38 41 42+ Number of patients 314 458 528 258 Number of cycles 404 633 792 420 AMH (ng/ml) 2.43 ± 0.14 1.56 ± 0.08 1.09 ± 0.05 0.72 ± 0.06 No. of oocytes retrieved 13.3 ± 0.4 12.0 ± 0.3 10.4 ± 0.3 8.6 ± 0.3 No. of embryos transferred 2.12 ± 0.03 2.44 ± 0.03 3.11 ± 0.05 3.40 ± 0.11 AMH = anti-müllerian hormone.

Age, AMH and pregnancy outcomes 759 by 25% compared with that of women with AMH in the lowest tertile (55 ± 3% versus 30 ± 6%, P < 0.02). The clinical pregnancy rate for women with AMH concentrations in the mid-tertile was 46 ± 4% which did not differ statistically from those of the higher or the lower tertiles (Figure 1A). The risk of cycle cancellation for women with AMH 0.29 ng/ml was 40 ± 7%, significantly higher than those of women in the middle and the high tertiles (9 ± 2%, P < 0.001 and 8 ± 2%, P < 0.001, respectively) (Figure 1B). However, once cycles cancelled due to poor response to ovarian stimulation were excluded, the clinical pregnancy rates per retrieval were equivalent across all three AMH tertiles (50 ± 9% versus 50 ± 5% versus 59 ± 3%) (Figure 1C). In addition, no significant differences were found in the live birth rates per embryo transfer across the three AMH tertiles (Figure 1D). For women 42 years and older initiating IVF treatment, having AMH concentrations in the highest tertile was associated with the same clinical pregnancy rate as that of the middle tertile (18 ± 5% versus 14 ± 2%, respectively). However, having AMH concentrations in the lowest tertile was associated with only a 3 ± 1% clinical pregnancy rate, significantly different from those of the middle (P < 0.004) and the high (P < 0.001) tertiles (Figure 1A). The cycle cancellation risk for women with AMH 0.29 ng/ml was 54 ± 3%, significantly higher than those of the middle (17 ± 2%, P < 0.001) and the high (8 ± 3%, P < 0.001) tertiles (Figure 1B). Clinical pregnancy rate adjusted by per Figure 1 (A) The relationship between IVF clinical pregnancy rates per initiated cycle and serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) tertiles stratified by age. For women aged <34 years, the only significant difference in pregnancy rate was between that of women in the highest and the lowest tertiles (P < 0.02). For women aged 34 37 years, the clinical pregnancy rates demonstrated a significant positive linear relationship with serum AMH concentrations (P < 0.01). This relationship was also observed for women 38 41 (P < 0.01). For women aged 42 years with AMH 0.29 ng/ml, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower than those of the middle and higher quartiles (P < 0.004 and P < 0.001 respectively). The clinical pregnancy rates for women in the middle and highest tertiles were not significantly different. (B) Cycle cancellation risks for women with AMH concentrations in the lowest tertile were significantly higher than those of women whose AMH concentrations were in the higher tertiles for all age groups (all P < 0.01). (C) Clinical pregnancy rates per retrieval after excluding the cycles that were cancelled due to poor response during ovarian stimulation did not differ significantly across all three AMH tertiles for women aged <34 years. For women aged 34 37 years, the only significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate was between those of the highest and the lowest tertiles (P < 0.005). For women aged 38 41 years, the clinical pregnancy rate in the highest tertile was significantly greater than those of the middle (P < 0.02) and lowest tertiles (P < 0.001). For women aged 42 years, clinical pregnancy rate in the lowest tertile was significantly lower than those of the middle (P < 0.01) and highest (P < 0.01) tertiles. However, women having AMH in the highest tertile did not have a greater chance of pregnancy compared with those of women in the middle tertile. (D) The live birth rates per embryo transfer did not differ significantly across all three AMH tertiles for women aged <34 years. For women aged 34 37 years, the live birth rate in women with AMH in the lowest tertile was significantly lower than those of the middle (P < 0.05) and highest tertiles (P < 0.05). For women aged 38 41 years, the live birth rates for women in the low, middle and high AMH tertiles, respectively, were not statistically significantly different. For women aged 42 years, significantly more live births were observed in the highest AMH compared with the lowest. *P < 0.05 compared with the highest tertile; P < 0.05 compared with the middle tertile.

760 JG Wang et al. Fig 1. (continued) retrieval was 6 ± 2% for women in the lowest AMH tertile, which was significantly less than those of the middle (P < 0.01) and the high (P < 0.01) tertiles. Again, having AMH concentrations in the highest tertile did not confer a greater clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval compared with those in the middle tertile (20 ± 5% versus 17 ± 3%) (Figure 1C). There were no live births observed in women with AMH concentrations in the lowest tertile which was significantly different from that of women in the highest tertile (10 ± 4%, P < 0.05) (Figure 1D). For women in the intermediate age group 34 37, a significantly positive linear association was noted between AMH concentrations and clinical pregnancy rate (Figure 1A). The clinical pregnancy rates per initiated cycle were 21 ± 4%, 37 ± 3% and 47 ± 3% for the low, middle and high AMH tertiles. All pair-wise comparisons of clinical pregnancy rates across the three AMH groups were individually statistically significant (P < 0.01) even with adjustments made for the multiple comparisons (Figure 1A). Similarly the significant linear association was also noted for women aged 38 41 with clinical pregnancy rates per initiated cycle of 14 ± 2%, 26 ± 2% and 38 ± 3% (P < 0.01) for the low, middle and high AMH tertiles (Figure 1A). Having AMH concentrations 0.29 ng/ml was associated with a 34 ± 4% and 43 ± 3% risk of cycle cancellation in the 34 37 and the 38 41 age groups, respectively. The cancellation risks were significantly greater than those of the higher tertiles (P < 0.01) in the respective age groups (Figure 1B). In terms of clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval for women 34 37, having AMH in the highest tertile was associated with a significantly greater clinical pregnancy rate only when compared with that of the lowest tertile (50 ± 3% versus 33 ± 5%, P < 0.005; Figure 1C). As for the live birth rates per embryo transfer in this age group, women with AMH in the lowest tertile (16 ± 5%) had significantly lower rates compared with those of the middle (29 ± 3%, P < 0.05) and the highest tertiles (30 ± 3%, P < 0.05) (Figure 1D). For women aged 38 41, having AMH in the highest tertile was associated with a significantly greater clinical pregnancy rate (40 ± 3%) than either that of the middle tertile (31 ± 2%, P < 0.02) or the lowest tertile (24 ± 3%, P < 0.001) (Figure 1C). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the live birth rates amongst the three AMH tertiles in this age group (14 ± 3% versus 16 ± 2% versus 20 ± 3%) (Figure 1D). Discussion A significant positive relationship exists between IVF clinical pregnancy rate and the quantitative ovarian reserve as measured by the serum AMH; however, the strength of the association is modulated by patient age. The variable relationship may explain the discrepant results amongst the previous investigations as the age distribution of the study populations varied (Barad et al., 2009; Broer et al., 2009; Ebner et al., 2006; Eldar-Geva et al., 2005; Ficicioglu et al., 2006; Gnoth et al., 2008; Hazout et al., 2004; Kwee et al., 2008; McIlveen et al., 2007; Penarrubia et al., 2005; Smeenk et al., 2007; Wunder et al., 2008). In addition, most of the previous investigations had sample sizes around 100 200 patients. This results in inadequate statistical power to detect absolute pregnancy rate differences that were less than 20 30%. As demonstrated in the present study, the magnitude of the greatest clinical pregnancy rate difference between the highest and the lowest tertiles was

Age, AMH and pregnancy outcomes 761 only 26%, which suggests that the prior studies may have been underpowered for comparing pregnancy outcomes. The success of assisted reproduction technologies is jointly determined by the interaction between oocyte quality and quantity. The ovarian ageing process results qualitatively from the decline in the proportion of developmentally competent oocytes as well as quantitatively from the diminishing number of oocytes available for selection and recruitment. With a greater proportion of biologically competent oocytes, the number of oocytes needed to achieve pregnancy is expected to be less. However, with ovarian ageing, the diminishing proportion of normal oocytes needs to be compensated for quantitatively by increasing the number of available oocytes through controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Hence, a greater number of oocytes retrieved per IVF cycle confers a higher chance of obtaining the requisite competent oocytes to achieve pregnancy each cycle in women experiencing early and middle stages of oocyte quality decline. Nonetheless, with the most advanced ovarian ageing, even the excess oocytes obtained through ovarian stimulation cannot sufficiently compensate for the paucity of normal gametes. A generalized AMH threshold value for predicting pregnancy outcomes does not exist because oocyte quality is not accounted for by quantitative ovarian reserve markers alone. As demonstrated in this study, the clinical pregnancy rate is 50% per retrieval for women younger than 34 years even with very low AMH and this rate does not differ from those of women with higher AMH concentrations in the same age group. Similarly, the live birth rates remain the same across all AMH concentrations for these women. These observations suggest that low quantitative ovarian reserve is not associated with lower oocyte quality in young patients and the prognosis remains excellent for these patients despite very low AMH concentrations. For women 42 years or older, the combination of poor quality oocyte and low quantitative reserve culminates in extremely poor prognosis. Women with AMH 0.29 ng/ml in this age group face a 97% chance of failure per initiated IVF cycle, a 54% chance of cycle cancellation during stimulation due to poor response and only a 6% chance of clinical pregnancy per cycle even if they meet the requirement to undergo oocyte retrieval. In addition, no live births were observed in women from this age group with AMH 0.29 ng/ml. Moreover, the equivalent clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between women in the middle and the highest AMH tertiles suggest a higher quantitative ovarian reserve in this age group does not imply better-quality oocytes. Hence, women older than 42 should not be falsely reassured that they have the same prognosis as that of younger women, even with high AMH concentrations. In conclusion, this simple age-stratified analysis demonstrated the variable relationships between quantitative ovarian reserve and IVF pregnancy outcomes. For women between the ages of 34 and 41, the positive linear relationship between AMH and pregnancy outcomes demonstrates that the extent of oocyte quality decline can be partially and effectively compensated by utilizing the excess oocyte reserve. Hence, the clinical application of basal AMH testing as a predictor of IVF outcomes may be most appropriate for women in this age group. In the two extremes of female reproductive age, the chance of pregnancy is predominantly determined by oocyte quality and therefore diminishes the predictive value of quantitative ovarian reserve. References Barad, D.H., Weghofer, A., Gleicher, N., 2009. Comparing anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as predictors of ovarian function. Fertil. Steril. 91, 1553 1555. Broekmans, F.J., Kwee, J., Hendriks, D.J., et al., 2006. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum. Reprod. Update 12, 685 718. Broer, S.L., Mol, B.W., Hendriks, D., et al., 2009. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil. Steril. 91, 705 714. Ebner, T., Sommergruber, M., Moser, M., et al., 2006. Basal level of anti-mullerian hormone is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles. Hum. Reprod. 21, 2022 2026. Eldar-Geva, T., Ben-Chetrit, A., Spitz, I.M., et al., 2005. Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome. Hum. Reprod. 20, 3178 3183. Fanchin, R., Mendez Lozano, D.H., Frydman, N., et al., 2007. Anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations in the follicular fluid of the preovulatory follicle are predictive of the implantation potential of the ensuing embryo obtained by in vitro fertilization. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92, 1796 1802. Ficicioglu, C., Kutlu, T., Baglam, E., et al., 2006. Early follicular antimullerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve. Fertil. Steril. 85, 592 596. Gnoth, C., Schuring, A.N., Friol, K., et al., 2008. Relevance of anti-mullerian hormone measurement in a routine IVF program. Hum. Reprod. 23, 1359 1365. Hazout, A., Bouchard, P., Seifer, D.B., et al., 2004. Serum antimullerian hormone/mullerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol. Fertil. Steril. 82, 1323 1329. Kwee, J., Schats, R., McDonnell, J., et al., 2008. Evaluation of anti-mullerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve. Fertil. Steril. 90, 737 743. McIlveen, M., Skull, J., Ledger, D., et al., 2007. Evaluation of the utility of multiple endocrine and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve in the prediction of cycle cancellation in a high-risk IVF population. Hum. Reprod. 22, 778 785. Penarrubia, J., Fabregues, F., Manau, D., et al., 2005. Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist gonadotropin treatment. Hum. Reprod. 20, 915 922. Smeenk, J.M., Sweep, F.C., Zielhuis, G.A., et al., 2007. Antimullerian hormone predicts ovarian responsiveness, but not embryo quality or pregnancy, after in vitro fertilization or intracyoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil. Steril. 87, 223 226. Sun, W., Stegmann, B.J., Henne, M., et al., 2008. A new approach to ovarian reserve testing. Fertil. Steril. 90, 2196 2202. Wunder, D.M., Guibourdenche, J., Birkhauser, M., et al., 2008. Anti-Mullerian hormone and inhibin B as predictors of pregnancy after treatment by in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil. Steril. 90, 2203 2210. Declaration: The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest. Received 27 February 2010; refereed 6 May 2010; accepted 24 June 2010.