Characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of primary GI melanoma cases compared to cutaneous melanoma, SEER:

Similar documents
Surgical Management of Metastatic Colon Cancer: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database

Accuracy of the SEER HPV status site specific factor 10 (SSF-10) variable for head and neck cancer (HNC) cases in Iowa:

Racial differences in six major subtypes of melanoma: descriptive epidemiology

INTRODUCTION TO CANCER STAGING

Ian Landry, MPH Beth Schmidt, MSPH

Construction of a North American Cancer Survival Index to Measure Progress of Cancer Control Efforts

4/10/2018. SEER EOD and Summary Stage. Overview KCR 2018 SPRING TRAINING. What is SEER EOD? Ambiguous Terminology General Guidelines

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Colon and Rectum Cancer, 2013

The role of cytoreductive. nephrectomy in elderly patients. with metastatic renal cell. carcinoma in an era of targeted. therapy

Treatment disparities for patients diagnosed with metastatic bladder cancer in California

Physician Follow-Up and Guideline Adherence in Post- Treatment Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer

Cancer in New Mexico 2017

Ethnic Disparities in the Treatment of Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Juan P. Wisnivesky, MD, MPH, Thomas McGinn, MD, MPH, Claudia Henschke, PhD,

Endoscopic ultrasound and impact on survival in rectal cancer patients : a SEER-Medicare study.

Rare Cancer Prevalence in the SEER Population: Hepatobiliary Cancers,

PREVIEW OF REGISTRY-SPECIFIC AND AGGREGATED RELATIVE SURVIVAL ESTIMATES IN CANCER IN NORTH AMERICA

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , with a Special Feature Regarding Survival

Cancer in New Mexico 2014

1 Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Long term survival study of de-novo metastatic breast cancers with or without primary tumor resection

AJCC 7th Edition Handbook Errata as of 9/21/10

Clinical Study Mucosal Melanoma in the Head and Neck Region: Different Clinical Features and Same Outcome to Cutaneous Melanoma

Unplanned Hospitalizations and Readmissions among Elderly Patients with GI Cancer

Carcinoembryonic Antigen

CANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I

Colon and Rectum: 2018 Solid Tumor Rules

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Stomach Cancer

IMPACT OF AREA-POVERTY RATE ON LATE-STAGE COLORECTAL CANCER INCIDENCE IN INDIANA, NAACCR JUNE 22, 2017

OFCCR CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT FORM

The Quality of Cancer Registry Data: Preliminary Results from CDC-NPCR s Patterns of Care Study

Research Article Clinical Features and Outcomes Differ between Skeletal and Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , Featuring Survival Questions and Answers

The projection of short- and long-term survival for. Conditional Survival Among Patients With Carcinoma of the Lung*

Overview of Gynecologic Cancers in New Jersey

EFFECT OF RADIATION THERAPY ON SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH RESECTED MERKEL CELL CARCINOMA: A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS JULIAN A. KIM, M.D.

Racial and Social Economic Factors Impact on the Cause Specific Survival of Pancreatic Cancer: A SEER Survey

Chibueze Onyemkpa 1, Alan Davis 1, Michael McLeod 1, Tolutope Oyasiji 1,2. Original Article

The prognosis of different distant metastases pattern in prostate cancer: A population based retrospective study

We re on the Web! Visit us at VOLUME 19 ISSUE 1. January 2015

Cancer in Utah: An Overview of Cancer Incidence and Mortality from

COLON AND RECTUM SOLID TUMOR RULES ABSTRACTORS TRAINING

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY. Helen Mari Parsons

Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

DAYS IN PANCREATIC CANCER

The Role of CCR9 and Melanoma Metastasis to Small Intestine. Farin Amersi, MD Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center Cedar Sinai Medical Center

CDC HPV Typing of Cancers Study: Evaluating Representativeness

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Melanoma of the Skin

Pancreatic Cancer in Florida ( ) Prepared by: Lydia Voti, M.S. Florida Cancer Data System PO Box (D4-11) Miami, FL

Supplementary Appendix

Incidence of Cancers Associated with Modifiable Risk Factors and Late Stage Diagnoses for Cancers Amenable to Screening Idaho

THE BURDEN OF CANCER IN NEBRASKA: RECENT INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY DATA

THE SURVIVORSHIP EXPERIENCE IN PANCREATIC CANCER

Trends and Comparative Effectiveness in Treatment of Stage IV Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Updates on the Conflict of Postoperative Radiotherapy Impact on Survival of Young Women with Cancer Breast: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Ethnic disparities in melanoma diagnosis and survival

Cancers with Increasing Incidence Trends in the United States: Edgar P. Simard, PhD MPH

Changes to SEER Data Set for Scope of Regional Lymph Node Surgery

Temporal Trends in Demographics and Overall Survival of Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients at Moffitt Cancer Center From 1986 to 2008

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Urinary Bladder Cancer, 2016

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Cervical Cancer, 2016

Incidence of Cancers Associated with Modifiable Risk Factors and Late Stage Diagnoses for Cancers Amenable to Screening Idaho

Report to Waikato Medical Research Foundation

Interactive Staging Bee

Melanoma-Back to Basics I Thought I Knew Ya! Paul K. Shitabata, M.D. Dermatopathologist APMG

MCR: MANAGEMENT OF 2018 CHANGES. By: Maricarmen Traverso-Ortiz MPH, CGG, CTR

Evaluation of 6 Patients with Genital Melanoma from Onset of Symptoms to Death: Evaluate the Factors Affecting the Prognosis of the Disease

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Pancreatic Cancer, 2016

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Kidney and Renal Pelvis Cancer, 2016

Childhood brain tumors in California

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer, 2016

Cancer Registry Report. Cancer Focus: Melanoma

Collection of Recorded Radiotherapy Seminars

Locoregional treatment Session Oral Abstract Presentation Saulo Brito Silva

Thymic neoplasms are the most common tumors of

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2016

Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Closer Look at the Characteristics of These Diverse Tumors

Cancer A Superficial Introduction

National Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2014

Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuropathy Post Chemotherapy in Three Health Care Systems

J Clin Oncol 26: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

WHI Extension Appendix A, Form Report of Cancer Outcome (Ver. 8.2) Page 1

Gene Expression Profiling has been proposed as a method of risk stratification for uveal melanoma.

8. The polyp in the illustration can be described as (circle all that apply) a. Exophytic b. Pedunculated c. Sessile d. Frank

Evaluation of AJCC, UICC, and Brigham and Women's Hospital Tumor Staging for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Supplemental Table S2: Subgroup analysis for IL-6 with BMI in 3 groups

Thyroid Cancer in New Mexico

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Lung & Bronchus Cancer, 2016

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

GSK Medicine: Study No.: Title: Rationale: Objectives: Indication: Study Investigators/Centers: Research Methods:

Supplementary Information

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Prostate Cancer, 2016

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer

DATA STANDARDS AND QUALITY CONTROL MEMORANDUM DSQC #

Surgical resection improves survival in pancreatic cancer patients without vascular invasion- a population based study

Louisiana Cancer Facts & Figures, Thyroid Cancer

Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Era of Histology Codes: Results of a Population-Based Study

The Cancer Burden in California. Janet Bates MD MPH California Cancer Registry California Department of Public Health April 25, 2012

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , Featuring Survival

Transcription:

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of primary GI melanoma cases compared to cutaneous melanoma, SEER:1973-2015 Amanda Kahl, MPH Mary E. Charlton, PhD, Imran Hassan, MD, Paolo Goffredo, MD, Catherine Chioreso, MPH, & Chi Lin, MD Oral Presentation, NAACCR June 14, 2018

Background Melanoma: ~10% of all primary cancer diagnoses in US 5 th and 6 th most common cancer in males and females Rare cases of primary gastrointestinal (GI) melanoma Reported to arise from mucosal membranes of the Esophagus Stomach Small intestine Colon Rectum Anus

Background 60% of metastatic skin melanomas have GI involvement at autopsy HOWEVER, several studies reported GI melanoma in the absence of skin melanoma But HOW?? Stem cells differentiating into melanocytes in the GI tract Cell migration

Primary GI Melanoma Most studies of GI melanoma have been based on case series Population-based cancer registries allow for examination of rare cancers over long periods of time

Study objective Compare characteristics, treatment, and survival between skin melanoma and primary GI melanoma Including sites of the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, rectum, and anus

INCLUSION CRITERIA Diagnosed between 1973-2015 Histology of 8720-8799 GI melanoma sites: Esophagus (C150-C159) Stomach (C160-C169) Small intestine (C170-C179) Colon (C180-C189, C260) Rectum (C199, C209) Anus (C210, C211, C212, C218) Skin melanoma: C440-C449 First primary malignant melanoma: - GI melanoma N=828 - Skin melanoma N=304,797 Not reported via autopsy or death certificate - GI melanoma N=827 - Skin melanoma N=304,082 Ages 18-100 - GI melanoma N=827 - Skin melanoma N=302,194 Excluded: GI melanoma N=1 Skin melanoma N=715 Excluded: GI melanoma N=0 Skin melanoma N=1,888

Methods SEER*Stat used to extract patient, tumor and treatment variables Statistical analysis performed in SAS Chi-square tests for bivariate analyses Cause-specific Survival Cox proportional hazard models Incidence rates (1973-2015) were calculated in SEER*Stat and analyzed in Joinpoint

Results

GI Melanoma Incidence Rate, SEER 18 1973-2015

Skin Melanoma vs GI Melanoma Patient characteristics between GI melanoma and skin melanoma, 1973-2015 Cutaneous Melanoma GI Melanoma (N=302,194) (N=827) N % N % p-value Age at diagnosis 18-49 98,994 33% 95 12% <0.0001 50-69 125,842 42% 327 40% 70-100 77,358 26% 405 49% Sex Female 135,090 45% 483 58% <0.0001 Male 167,104 55% 344 42% Race White 285,387 94% 695 84% <0.0001 Non-White 16,807 6% 132 16% Married Yes 156,993 52% 434 53% 0.762 No 145,201 48% 393 48% Year of diagnosis 1973-1987 26,754 9% 68 8% 0.973 1988-1994 23,102 8% 62 8% 1995-2001 47,936 16% 130 16% 2002-2008 93,313 31% 259 31% 2009-2015 111,089 37% 308 37%

Skin Melanoma vs GI Melanoma Tumor characteristics between patients with GI melanoma and skin melanoma, 1973-2015 Cutaneous Melanoma GI Melanoma (N=302,194) (N=827) N % N % p-value SEER Summary Localized 248,669 82% 268 32% <0.0001 Stage Regional 28,033 9% 206 25% Distant 11,675 4% 260 31% Unstaged 13,817 5% 93 11% Tumor Size* <2 mm/cm 216,272 72% 85 10% - 2-<5 mm/ cm 24,789 8% 251 30% >=5 mm/cm 10,816 4% 176 21% Unknown 50,317 17% 315 38% *Tumor size is thickness in mm for cutaneous melanoma and size in cm for GI melanom

Skin Melanoma vs GI Melanoma Treatment characteristics between patients with GI melanoma and skin melanoma, 1988-2015 Surgery* Cutaneous Melanoma GI Melanoma (N=257,391) (N=827) N % N % p-value Local tumor 228562 83% 293 38.6 <0.000 excision 1 Major resection 25595 9% 254 33.5 Surgery, NOS 1500 1% 23 3% None or local tumor destruction only 18750 7% 188 25% Unknown 1033 0.4% 1 0.2% Radiation* Yes 6212 2% 154 20% <0.000 1 No/Unknown 269228 98% 605 80% Chemotherap Yes 5437 2% 151 20% <0.000 y* *Due to the large number of unknown surgery for cases diagnosed prior to 1988, they were excluded No/Unknown from the treatment 270003 variables 98% 608 80% 1

Anorectal vs Other GI site Melanoma Characteristics between anorectal and other GI site melanoma, 1973-2015 Anorectal Melanoma Other GI Melanoma Sites (N=688) (N=139) N % N % p- value GI cancer sites Esophagus - - 53 38% - Stomach - - 27 19% Intestine - - 38 27% Colon - - 21 15% Rectum 275 40% - - Anus 413 60% - -

Anorectal vs Other GI site Melanoma Patient characteristics between anorectal and other GI site melanoma, 1973-2015 Anorectal Melanoma Other GI Melanoma Sites (N=688) (N=139) N % N % p- value Age at diagnosis 18-49 79 12% 16 12% 0.920 50-69 270 39% 57 41% 70-100 339 49% 66 48% 0.000 3 Sex Female 421 61% 62 45% Male 267 39% 77 55% Race White 572 83% 123 89% 0.116 Non-White 116 17% 16 12% Married Yes 361 53% 73 53% 0.992 No 327 48% 66 48% Year of diagnosis 1973-1987 54 8% 14 10% 0.507 1988-1994 52 8% 10 7% 1995-2001 109 16% 21 15%

Anorectal vs Other GI site Melanoma Tumor characteristics between anorectal and other GI site melanoma, 1973-2015 Anorectal Other GI Melanoma Melanoma Sites (N=688) (N=139) N % N % SEER Summary Localized 228 33% 40 29% Stage Regional 183 27% 23 17% Distant 200 29% 60 43% Unstaged 77 11% 16 12% Tumor Size <2 cm 83 12% 2 1% 2-<5 cm 222 32% 29 21% >=5 cm 128 19% 48 35% Unknown 255 37% 60 43% p- value 0.005 4 <. 0001

Anorectal vs Other GI site Melanoma Treatment characteristics between between anorectal and other GI site melanoma, 1988-2015 Surgery* Other GI Anorectal Melanoma Melanoma Sites (N=688) (N=139) N % N % p-value Local tumor excision Major resection 183 29% 71 57% Surgery, NOS 22 4% 1 1% None or local tumor destruction only 289 46% 4 3% <.0001 139 22% 49 39% Unknown 1 0% - - Radiation* Yes 136 22% 18 14% 0.073 No/Unknown 498 79% 107 86% Chemotherap y* Yes 126 20% 25 20% 0.974 No/Unknown 508 80% 100 80% *Due to the large number of unknown surgery for cases diagnosed prior to 1988, they were excluded from the treatment variables

Kaplan Meier Cause-Specific Survival Curves

Survival of GI melanoma and skin melanoma patients, 1973-2015

Survival of localized GI melanoma and skin melanoma patients, 1973-2015 Localized

Survival of regional GI melanoma and skin melanoma patients, 1973-2015 Regional

Survival of distant GI melanoma and skin melanoma patients, 1973-2015 Distant

Cause-Specific Survival (CSS) Hazard Models

CSS adjusted hazard model including both GI melanoma and skin melanoma 1988-2015 (N=228,927) *Surgery NOS or Unknown Surgery; Unstaged, and Unknown size were excluded from model All cases HR 95% CI Cancer Type Cutaneous Melanoma 0.29 (0.25, 0.33) Anorectal Melanoma 1.00 REF Other GI site Melanoma 0.58 (0.42, 0.81) Age at diagnosis 18-49 0.37 (0.35, 0.38) 50-69 0.55 (0.53, 0.56) 70-100 1.00 REF Sex Female 0.67 (0.65, 0.69) Male 1.00 REF Race White 1.00 REF Non-White 0.74 (0.68, 0.80) Married Yes 1.00 REF No 1.08 (1.05, 1.11) Year of diagnosis 1988-1994 1.00 REF 1995-2001 0.85 (0.80, 0.89) 2002-2008 0.82 (0.78, 0.87) 2009-2015 0.76 (0.71, 0.81) SEER Summary Stage Localized 1.00 REF

CSS adjusted hazard model including both GI melanoma and skin melanoma 1988-2015 (N=228,927) *Surgery NOS or Unknown Surgery; Unstaged, and Unknown size were excluded from model All cases HR 95% CI Surgery Local tumor excision 1.00 REF Major resection 1.37 (1.30, 1.44) None or local tumor destruction only 1.54 (1.41, 1.68) Radiation Yes 1.00 REF No/Unknown 0.44 (0.41, 0.46) Chemotherapy Yes 1.00 REF No/Unknown 0.43 (0.41, 0.46)

CSS adjusted hazard model of GI melanoma 1988-2015 (N=440) *Surgery NOS or Unknown Surgery; Unstaged, and Unknown size were excluded from model GI Melanoma HR 95% CI Cancer Type Anorectal Melanoma 1.00 REF Other GI site Melanoma 0.92 (0.63, 1.34) Age at diagnosis 18-49 0.56 (0.38, 0.84) 50-69 0.88 (0.67, 1.15) 70-100 1.00 REF Sex Female 1.02 (0.80, 1.32) Male 1.00 REF Race White 1.00 REF Non-White 1.12 (0.82, 1.53) Married Yes 1.00 REF No 0.82 (0.65, 1.05) Year of diagnosis 1988-1994 1.00 REF 1995-2001 0.98 (0.59, 1.62) 2002-2008 0.82 (0.51, 1.32) 2009-2015 0.72 (0.44, 1.16) SEER Summary Stage Localized 1.00 REF

CSS adjusted hazard model of GI melanoma 1988-2015 (N=440) *Surgery NOS or Unknown Surgery; Unstaged, and Unknown size were excluded from model GI Melanoma HR 95% CI Tumor Size <2 cm 1.00 REF 2-<5 cm 1.13 (0.80, 1.61) >=5 cm 1.07 (0.72, 1.59) Surgery Local tumor excision 1.00 REF Major resection 0.92 (0.67, 1.27) None or local tumor destruction only 1.62 (1.04, 2.51) Radiation Yes 1.00 REF No/Unknown 1.08 (0.77, 1.52) Chemothera py Yes 1.00 REF No/Unknown 1.03 (0.74, 1.43)

Conclusions Incidence of GI melanoma has increased over time Skin melanoma has better prognosis overall and at every stage compared to GI melanoma Local tumor excision is no better than major resection for GI melanoma

Limitations & Strengths Limitations Small number of GI melanomas in individual sites Cases with GI melanoma may have undiagnosed primary skin melanoma Chemotherapy and radiation variables have sensitivity of 68% and 80%, respectively Strengths SEER data provide detailed information about cancer stage and treatment at time of diagnosis One of the first population based studies that characterizes the epidemiology, treatment, and survival of primary GI melanoma that includes sites of the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, rectum, and anus compared to skin melanoma.

Questions? Thank you Contact information: amanda-kahl@uiowa.edu