SAFETY EVALUATION OF GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF LIVE INTERMEDIATE VACCINE AGAINST INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE

Similar documents
Infectious Bursal Disease, Immunosuppression and the role of VAXXITEK HVT+ IBD

PATHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL STUDY OF AN IN OVO COMPLEX VACCINE AGAINST INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE

Ceva HAND book of poultry diseases

Laboratory Clinical Study

Morphological investigation of bursa of fabricius of imported broilers and local chicks vaccinated with two types of ibd vaccines

Summary of Product Characteristics

INTRODUCTION. J.-H. Roh,,1 M. Kang,,1 B. Wei, R.-H. Yoon, H.-S. Seo, J.-Y. Bahng, J.-T. Kwon, S.-Y. Cha,,1 and H.-K. Jang,2

CHARACTERISATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS AND DETERMINATION OF POSSIBLE VACCINE STRAIN(S) IN KENYA

Interaction of Gumboro and other Immunosuppressive Diseases on Respiratory Disease

G. W. WOOD J. C. MUSKETT and D. H. THORNTON MAFF, Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey, U.K.

Gumboro Disease: where are we with IBDV epidemiology. J.J. (Sjaak) de Wit, DVM, PhD, dipl ECPVS GD Deventer, The Netherlands

ESSENTIAL PROTECTION

AviagenBrief. Marek s Disease Control in Broiler Breeders

unvaccinated broilers and broiler breeders in Croatia

LUCRARI STIINTIFICE MEDICINA VETERINARA, VOL. XXXVI, 2003, TIMISOARA 303

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

Department of Poultry Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland

Response of the Embryo to in ovo

Dr.Christophe Cazaban

Laboratory tools for monitoring and understanding IBDV infection and vaccination

Universal protection against infectious bursal disease (IBD) induced by the vector vaccine VAXXITEK HVT+IBD

INCLUSION BODY HEPATITIS AND HYDROPERICARDIUM SYNDROME (ADENOVIRUS INFECTIONS)

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Comparison of the Efficacy of the Immune Complex and Conventionally Live Vaccine in Broilers against Infectious Bursal Disease Infection

Learning Module 3 Lymphoid System Learning component 1 Basic Responses and Normal Histology

Optimization for Chick Performance Bangkok, Thailand 12 th March 2013

Avian Infectious Bronchitis Vaccine, Inactivated

ANSES. Agence Nationale du Médicament Vétérinaire (National Agency for Veterinary Drugs) (Reference Member State) BP FOUGERES CEDEX FRANCE

Diagnostic Considerations for Marek s Disease. Frederic J. Hoerr, DVM, PhD AMEVEA - Argentina Colon, Entre Rios May 15, 2013

Biological monitoring of vaccine take and productive parameters in broilers vaccinated with

MRVSA 3(1), Latif et al ISSN

CEVAC CEVAC BROILER ND K / 5000 doses

CHICKEN INFECTIOUS ANEMIA

Diagnostic Guide for Marek s Disease and other Tumors

Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences, Volume 15 (Number 2). August, 2017

ASEAN STANDARDS FOR ANIMAL VACCINES

Title. Author(s)SUGIMURA, Makoto; YAMADA, Junzo. CitationJapanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 18(1): Issue Date DOI. Doc URL.

Virology 409 (2011) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Virology. journal homepage:

Advances in Marek s Disease Vaccine Development:

ZOOTECNICA. International WORLD S POULTRY JOURNAL

IMMUNOGENICITY OF FORMALDYDE INACTIVATED NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS FIELD ISOLATE IN MATERNAL ANTIBODY FREE CHICKENS

PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR A VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCT

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION EMEA/V/C/036. Intervet International B.V., Wim de Körverstraat 35, 5831 AN Boxmeer, The Netherlands. N/a

ISOLATION OF A SARCOMA VIRUS FROM A SPONTANEOUS CHICKEN TUMOR

Infectious Bursal Disease: A case compilation study in commercial broiler farms at Mirsarai, Chittagong, Bangladesh.

The Review of Newcastle Disease Live Vaccines Application. By: M. Abdoshah

Immunogenicity and Safety of Queensland V4 and Ulster 2C strains of. Newcastle Disease Virus Given to Maternally Immune, Newly Hatched

Control of Gumboro Disease

SciFed Virology Research Journal

A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. by Dr. David B. Boyle. September 2003

Research note. Merial S.A.S., 29 avenue Tony Garnier Lyon cedex 07 France 2

fattening chickens immunized with live or inactivated Newcastle disease vaccine.

AVIAN ENCEPHALOMYELITIS- FOWL POX-PIGEON POX VACCINE

Nyamdolgor.U, Usuhgerel.S, Baatarjargal.P, others, Journal of agricultural sciences 15 (02): 51-55, 2015

Final Report Project #625. Antigenic Drift in Infectious Bursal Disease Viruses. Daral J. Jackwood, Ph.D. The Ohio State University

Detection of vvibdv strains and Australian variants in poultry

Effect of Herbal Immunomodulator on Immune Organ and Immunological Parameters in Giriraja Birds

EFFECT OF SUBLETHAL DOSE OF PENICILLIC ACID TOXICITY ON GROWTH, IMMUNITY AND LYMPHOID ORGANS IN BROILER CHICKENS ABSTRACT

Studies on probiotics effects on innate immune functions in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chicks (SUMMARY)

CevaC Mass L THe Ceva Mass solution

by Dr Thijs van Dijk and Anna-Christina Riebau Marketing Poultry Vaccines, Lohmann Animal Health

Immunity and Poultry Health (3)

UPDATE ON THE RUNTING - STUNTING SYNDROME

Etiology. Paramyxovirus type 1 = Newcastle disease.

Protection from avian influenza H5N1 virus infection with antibodyimpregnated

HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE LYMPHOID TISSUES OF BROILER CHICKENS. S. H. Akter*, M. Z. I. Khan, M. R. Jahan, M. R. Karim and M. R.

YOU THINK INFLUENZA IS FATAL? THINK AGAIN.

Methodology Prevalence:

ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage:

Beurteilungsbericht zur Veröffentlichung. (gemäß 31 Abs. 2 Tierimpfstoff-Verordnung) Poulvac IB Primer

SUMMARY. Keywords: quail, Coturnix japonica, morphology, ovary, oviduct, neurotrophins, immunohistochemistry

The pathogenesis of nervous distemper

SEROLOGICAL SURVEY ON THE PREVALENCE OF CHICKEN ANEMIA VIRUS IN BACKYARD POULTRY FLOCKS IN BULGARIA

An outbreak of a respiratory infection of multi-agents occurred in poultry flocks in Tripoli, Libya

Evaluation of live gumboro vaccine prepared from local variant strain for control of infectious bursal disease in Egypt

Avian encephalomyelitis (AE) Epidemic tremor. Dr./ Wafaa Abd El-ghany Assistant Professor of poultry dis., Fac. Vet. Med., Cairo Univ.

AVIAN VIRAL TUMORS I. MAREK'S DISEASE

Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, South Wirral, CH64 7TE, UNITED KINGDOM

Vaccination to stop transmission

Retrospective Study of Some Viral Poultry Diseases Diagnosed in Nigeria

IN VIVO STUDIES ON VIRAL VIRULENCE

GUMBORO FIELD EXPERIENCES IN SPAIN THINGS WE HAVE LEARNT!

Campylobacter work at the UK Veterinary Laboratories Agency

2007 : Became Poultry Corporate Marketing Director. Ceva Sante Animale, France

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Vectormune ND a step towards control of Newcastle Disease

NEWCASTLE KILLED VACCINES IN BROILERS

Improving vaccine titers with Original XPC

11/6/2014. Questions? vvibdv in California : What we think we know and where we re heading. What is Cooperative Extension? Who am I??

Poultry Disease Manual Characteristics And

Anja Holm Danish Medicines Agency. Genetic vaccines Oslo, 2008

CHARACTERIZATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUSES ISOLATED FROM COMMERCIAL CHICKENS. Jacqueline Marie Harris

Hatchery Vaccination Quality Control of Herpesvirus of Turkey-Infectious Bursal Disease HVT-IBD Viral Vector Vaccine Application by Specific qpcr

Responses of the Peyer's Patches in Germ-Free Mice

PATHOLOGY OF PASTEURELLA MULTOCIDA INFECTION IN CHICKENS

EFFECT OF DIETARY LUTEIN ON IMMUNE RESPONSE OF BREEDERS AND BROILER CHICKS. Holly Pizzey

Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios C/Campezo 1, Edificio Madrid España (Reference Member State)

making LT protection safer and easier

Overview. Organism Economic Impact Epidemiology Transmission Clinical Signs Diagnosis and Treatment Prevention and Control Actions to take

Transcription:

Praxis veterinaria 52 (1-2) 135-140, 2004. SAFETY EVALUATION OF GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF LIVE INTERMEDIATE VACCINE AGAINST INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE Original scientific paper G. Savić 1, S. Ćurić 2, V. Savić 3 1 Veterina Ltd., Svetonedeljska 2, Kalinovica, 10436 Rakov Potok, Croatia 2 Veterinary Faculty University of Zagreb, Heinzelova 55, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3 Croatian Veterinary Institute, Poultry Centre, Heinzelova 55, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia ABSTRACT. - Safety of GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF, live intermediate vaccine against infectious bursal disease vaccine, was evaluated in compliance with European Pharmacopoeia. A ten-fold dose (10 5.0 TCID 50 per chicken) of the vaccine was given to oneday-old as well as 15-day-old specific pathogen free chickens by ocular route. Chickens were observed daily for the next 21 days when they were sacrificed and their bursae were submitted for histological examination. No clinical signs or mortality were recorded during the observation period in both groups. In the bursa of most birds vaccinated at one day of life, intermediate atrophy and mild inflammation and fibrosis were found. These alterations were manifested by 50% lymphocyte depletion with a moderate vacuolisation in approximately 50% of lymphoid follicles, whereas in other lymphoid follicles only a mild lymphoid depletion and minor vacuolisation were noted. In the bursae of chickens vaccinated at the age of 15 days no atrophy of the mucosa epithelium was found, but only mild to moderate lymphoid depletion and/or vacuolisation of lymphoid follicles. However, the lymphoid follicles in these birds were of normal oval shape and of the same structure as the interstitial connective tissue. The results recorded in both groups indicate not only mild to medium severe alterations of the bursa, but also the tendency of their recovery and repopulating with B cells. Although the vaccine GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF does not fully comply with the European Pharmacopoeia requirements, it can be considered as a safe live infectious bursal disease vaccine of intermediary type. Key words: infectious bursal disease, live vaccine, safety INTRODUCTION Infectious bursal disease (IBD), an immunosuppressive disease of young chickens, has been responsible for major economic losses in the poultry industry worldwide, particularly for the past decade. The disease affects lymphoid organs, i.e. lymphoid cells in bursa of Fabricius, resulting in 135

136 lymphoid depletion and the final destruction of the bursa as the predominant feature of the pathogenesis of IBD (van den Berg, 2000). Chickens are highly susceptible to the virus between 3 and 6 weeks after hatching, when the bursa of Fabricius reaches maximum development (Müller at al., 2003). In the late 1980's, the emergence of very virulent IBD virus (vvibdv) in Western Europe, changed IBD situation from mainly subclinical infection causing less than 1% mortality and satisfactorily controlled by vaccination to severe infection causing mortality up to 25% in broilers and 60% in layers (van den Berg et al., 1991). It was no longer possible to protect broilers with vaccines produced from mild vaccinal strains because it was obvious that vvibdv could break through immunity provided by highly attenuated vaccine strains (van den Berg et al., 1991; van den Berg, 2000). Therefore, it was necessary to introduce more invasive strains in vaccine production. On the other side, it is well known that less attenuated strains may cause lesions in the bursa follicles followed by immunosuppression, particularly if 'hot' vaccines are used (Guittet et al., 1992). Bolis et al. (2003) reported that stronger vaccines give better protection to the bursa irrespective of the damage in the bursa tissue. Although their immunogenicity is a must, it is important for live IBD vaccine to be considerably safe. The aim of this trial was to evaluate safety of GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF (Veterina Ltd., Croatia), a live intermediate vaccine against IBD, in compliance with Eu. Ph. (1998) for testing live, freeze-dried vaccine against avian infectious bursal disease (Gumboro disease). MATERIALS AND METHODS Vaccine and vaccination GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF vaccine (Veterina Ltd., Croatia) was used in this study. GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF is a live, freezedried, IBD vaccine of intermediary type that contains VMG 91 strain of IBD virus in titre of 10 4.0 TCID 50 per dose. The vaccine was dissolved in distilled water in a way that 0.1 ml (2 droplets) of the solution consisted 10 regular vaccine doses i.e. 10 5.0 TCID 50. Each trial chicken was vaccinated with a droplet (0.05 ml) of the solution in each eye. As the result, each chicken was vaccinated with ten-fold vaccinal dose (10 5.0 TCID 50 ) in 0.1 ml volume of the solution. Birds Two groups, A and B, each consisting of 15 specific pathogen free (SPF) leghorn type chickens (SPAFAS, USA), were used in this trial. Each group was placed in separate isolator until the end of experiment. Feeding and watering of the birds were ad libitum. Trial procedure Chickens of group A were vaccinated at age of one day, whereas chickens of group B were vaccinated at age of 15 days. Birds of both groups were observed daily for following 21 days and then killed for histological examination of bursas of Fabricius. When collected, each bursa was labelled and individually treated. The bursas were fixed in 10 % buffered formalin. Histology Bursas were paraffin embedded and thin sections were made from each bursa, stained with haematoxylin and eosin and examined in a light microscope. RESULTS During the observation period of 21 days after vaccination neither mortality nor clinical signs were recorded in both trial groups. No symptoms that could be attributed to the vaccination with ten-fold dose were noted, as well. Bursa histology of group A In birds vaccinated with ten-fold dose of GUM- BOKAL IM FORTE SPF at age of one day, predominantly mild and intermediate alterations were found on day 21 after vaccination. In bursas of most of the birds (9), intermediate at-

rophy and mild inflammation and fibrosis were found. These alterations were manifesting in 50% lymphocyte depletion with intermediate vacuolisation in approximately 50% of lymphoid follicles, whereas in other lymphoid follicles only mild lymphoid depletion and mild vacuolisation were noted (Figure 1). Severe atrophy as well as pronounced inflammation and fibrosis of bursas were recorded in two chickens. This was manifested in more than 75% lymphoid depletion in at least 90% of the lymphoid follicles (Figure 2). Fibrosis and inflammation of bursas were found in four birds. Incomplete fibrosis was found in two chickens whereas complete fibrosis with infiltration of inflammatory cells, i.e. granulocytes, was found in other two chickens (Figure 3). Bursa histology of group B Figure 1 SPF in a chick vaccinated at one day of life. Moderate atrophy, mild inflammation and fibrosis, H&E, magnification x50. Slika 1 od jedan dan. Srednje jaka atrofija, blaga upala i fibroza. HE, povećanje 50x. Mild to moderate alterations, mainly in lymphoid follicles, were found in bursas of most of the chickens vaccinated with GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF at age of 15 days and examined 21 days after vaccination. In bursas of 11 chickens, no atrophy of epithelium was found, but mild to moderate lymphoid depletion and/or vacuolisation of lymphoid follicles were noted. However, lymphoid follicles were regularly shaped as well as interstitial conjunctive tissue (Figure 4). In bursas of four chickens, mild atrophy of epithelium as well as mild depletion and/or vacuolisation in one third of the lymphoid follicles was found. Most of the follicles were regularly shaped Figure 2 SPF in a chick vaccinated at one day of life. Severe atrophy and pronounced inflammation and fibrosis, H&E, magnification x50. Slika 2 od jedan dan. Jaka atrofija i izražena upala i fibroza. HE, povećanje 50x. Figure 3 SPF in a chick vaccinated at one day of life. A partial fibrosis and inflammation, H&E, magnification x50. Slika 3 od 1 dan. Djelomična fibroza i upala. HE, povećanje 50x. 137

DISCUSSION 138 Figure 4 SPF in a bird vaccinated on day 15 o age. A mild to moderate lymphoid depletion and vacuolisation of the lymphoid follicles, H&E, magnification x50. Slika 4 od 15 dana. Blaga do srednje jaka limfoidna deplecija i vakuolizacija limfoidnih folikula. HE, povećanje 50x. Figure 5 SPF in a bird vaccinated on day 15 of age. A mild atrophy of the epithelium and a mild depletion and vacuolisation of the lymphoid follicles, H&E, magnification x50. Slika 5 od 15 dana. Blaga atrofija epitela i blaga deplecija i vakuolizacija limfoidnih folikula. HE, povećanje 50x. with clearly distinguished cortex and medulla. Interstitial conjunctive tissue was also regularly shaped (Figure 5). The aim of this study was to evaluate safety of GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF, live vaccine against IBD, in compliance with the European Pharmacopoeia and therefore ten-fold dose of the vaccine was given to SPF chickens. Increased dose did not cause any clinical symptom or mortality in birds vaccinated at age of one day or in those vaccinated at age of 15 days. According to van der Berg (2000), the reason for mortality in chickens infected with IBDV would be related to the excessive release of cytokines and fever induction, independent of the damage of the bursa of Fabricius. Further, light hybrids are known to be more susceptible to the mortality induced by IBDV than heavy hybrids. This is due to the differences between the two types of birds in the major histocompatibility complex from allele B, and it does not interfere on the induction of bursal lesions in birds infected with IBDV (Nielsen et al., 1998). SPF birds used in this study were of Leghorn type i.e. light hybrids, and therefore it can be concluded that the vaccine is safe regarding clinical symptom and mortality of vaccinated birds, even if given in ten-fold dose. Histological changes of bursa of Fabricius found 21 days after vaccination were of different intensity in birds vaccinated at the age of one day and in birds vaccinated at age of 15 days. Generally, more pronounced and more extensive alterations in bursa of Fabricius in this study were found in the birds vaccinated as day-old. This finding seems to be unusual since it is known that the highest age susceptibility is during maximum development of bursa of Fabricius, which is between 3 and 6 weeks of age (van den Berg, 2000; Müller et al., 2003). This age susceptibility can be broader, but only in case of vvibdv strains (van den Berg et al., 1991; Nunoya et al., 1992). Therefore, it could be expected that more intensive alteration would be found in the birds vaccinated at age of 15 days, since number of susceptible cells present in bursa of Fabricius is significantly higher if compared to those in day-old chickens. However, it must be considered just a single sampling of bursas on 21 st day after vaccination has been done, as proposed by European Pharmacopoeia (1998) for testing live, freezedried vaccine against avian infectious bursal dis-

ease (Gumboro disease). The acute phase of the disease lasts for about seven to ten days, during which bursal follicles are depleted of B cells and the bursa becomes atrophic. Chickens that survive the acute disease clear the virus and recover from its pathologic effect and bursal follicles are repopulated with B cells (Kim et al., 1999; Sharma et al., 2000). However, IBDV strains vary in their pathogenicity and they range from strains that cause intense loss of the bursal stroma and of the follicular microenvironment that sustains cell B differentiation and those that cause little or no bursa damage. IBDV isolates and strains that induce partial follicular lymphocyte loss in the acute phase of infection will show follicles with extensive lymphocytic regeneration areas during the recovery phase (Pope, 1991). It is possible that, although intense bursa damages could occurred in the chickens vaccinated at age of 15 days, recovery and B cell repopulation of the bursas were significantly efficient, since histological examination of the bursas has fallen in age of their maximum development i.e. between 3 and 6 weeks of age. In other words, bursas of the chickens vaccinated as day-old did not fully recover until the age when the bursas were taken for histological examination i.e. at age of three weeks. This means that age of chickens for bursa examination may considerably affect its result. Further, the European Pharmacopoeia regulates safety testing of live IBD vaccine in SPF chickens of the minimum age stated on the label. Most of IBD vaccines are intended for vaccination of birds as young as day-old since young commercial chickens posses maternal antibodies that interfere with vaccinal strains and prevent post-vaccinal damage of the bursas (van den Berg and Meulemans, 1991; Saif, 1998; Müller et al., 2003). Since SPF birds do not posses specific maternal antibodies, they seem not to be appropriate indicator for safety test. Moreover, examining bursa damage caused by vaccination within first three weeks of live, i.e. before its maximum development, may miss present maximum recovery and repopulation of the bursas. According to the European Pharmacopoeia, IBD vaccine complies with the safety test if, 21 days after inoculation of the vaccine, no chicken shows lesions of the bursa of Fabricius. According to Abdel-Alim and Saif (2001) and Mass et al. (2001) the intensity of microscopic alterations in the bursa of Fabricius may also be quantified to evaluate the level of immune protection where less microscopic alterations means less immune protection. In the same way Bolis et al. (2003) concluded that stronger vaccine strains give better protection to the bursa, irrespective of the damage in the bursa tissue. Thus, complying the safety test proposed in the European Pharmacopoeia significantly reduces immune protection afforded by the vaccine if not completely diminishes it. Criteria that determine safety of live IBD vaccines should be adjusted to various types of the vaccines allowing certain microscopic lesion of the bursas. In this trial it was found that GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF, intermediate live IBD vaccine, when given in ten-fold dose to SPF chickens, causes no mortality or clinical symptoms. Histological examination has shown mainly mild to intermediate lesions of the bursas, but with tendency of their recovery and B cell repopulation. It can be concluded GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF is a safe vaccine. LITERATURE Abdel-Alim G. A., Y. M. Saif (2001): Immunogenicity and antigenicity of very virulent strains of infectious bursal disease viruses. Avian Diseases 45, 92-101. Bolis D. A., F. J. Paganini, V. A. Simon; M. F. Zuanaze, H. Scanavini Neto, A. R. A. Correa, N. M. K. Ito (2003): Gumboro disease: evaluation of serological and anatomopathological responses in vaccinated broiler chickens challenged with very virulent virus strain. Revista Brasileira de Cięncia Avícola 5, 137-146. Guittet M., H Le Coq, J. P. Picault, N. Etarradosi, G. Bennejean (1992): Safety of infectious bursal disease vaccines: assessment of an acceptability treshold. Developments of Biological Standards 79, 147-152. Kim I-J., M. Gagic, J. M. Sharma (1999): Recovery of antibody producing ability and lymphocite repopulation of bursal follicles in chickens exposed to infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Diseases 43, 401-413. Maas R. A., S. Venema, H. L. Ori, J. M. A. Pol, I. J. T. M. Claassen, A. A. H. M. ter Huurne (2001): Efficacy of inactivated infectious bursal disease (IBD) vaccines comparison of serology with protection of progeny against IBD virus strains of varying virulence. Avian Pathology 30, 345-354. 139

Müller H, M. R. Islam, R. Raue (2003): Research on infectious bursal disease -the past, the present and the future. Veterinary Microbiology 97, 153-165. Nielsen O. L., P. So/rensen, J. E. Hedemand, S. B. Laursen, P. H. Jo/rgensen (1998): Inflammatory response of different chicken lines and B haplotypes to infection with infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Pathology 27, 181-189. Nunoya T, Y. Otaki, M. Tajima, M. Hiraga, T. Saito (1992): Occurrence of acute infectious bursal disease with high mortality in Japan and pathogenicity of field isolates in SPF chickens. Avian Diseases 36, 597-609. Pope C. R. (1991): Pathology of lymphoid organs with emphasis on immunosuppression. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 30, 31-34. Saif Y. M. (1998): Infectious Bursal Disease and Hemorrhagic Enteritis. Poultry Science 77, 1186-1189. Sharma J. M., I-J. Kim, S. Rautenschlein, H-Y. Yeh (2000): Infectious bursal disease virus of chickens: pathogenesis and immunosupression. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 24, 223-235. van der Berg T. P., G. Meulemans (1991): Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: protection afforded by maternally derived antibodies ad interference with live vaccination. Avian Pathology 20, 409-421. van den Berg T. P., M. Gonze, G. Meulemans (1991): Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: Isolation and characterization of a highly virulent strain. Avian Pathology 20, 133-143. van den Berg T. P. (2000): Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: a review. Avian Pathology 29, 175-194. Received: 7 June 2004 Accepted: 20 August 2004 EVALUACIJA NEŠKODLJIVOSTI INTERMEDIJARNE VAKCINE PROTIV ZARAZNE BOLESTI BURZE GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF G. Savić, S. Ćurić, V. Savić IZVADAK. - Istražena je neškodljivost intermedijarne vakcine protiv zarazne bolesti burze GUM- BOKAL IM FORTE SPF prema zahtjevima Europske farmakopeje. Za istraživanje su upotrijebljene dvije skupine pilića slobodnih od specifičnih patogena (SPF). Prva skupina pilića vakcinirana je okularno deseterostrukom dozom vakcine (10 5,0 TCID 50 za pile) u dobi od jedan dan. Druga skupina vakcinirana je također okularno deseterostrukom dozom vakcine u dobi od 15 dana. Pilići su promatrani 21 dan nakon čega su žrtvovani, a Fabricijeve burze histološki pretražene. Tijekom razdoblja promatranja, ni u jednoj skupini nisu zamijećeni klinički znakovi bolesti niti je bilo uginuća. Histološki nalaz u burzama u većine pilića vakciniranih u dobi od jedan dan upućuje na srednje jaku atrofiju te blage upalne i fibrotične promjene. U približno 50% limfoidnih folikula je ustanovljena 50%-tna deplecija limfocita s osrednje izraženom vakuolizacijom, dok se u ostalim folikulima uočava samo blaža limfoidna deplecija i slabija vakuolizacija. U burzama pilića vakciniranih u dobi od 15 dana nisu nađene atrofične promjene u epitelu nabora sluznice. Vidljiva je samo blaga do srednje jaka limfoidna deplecija i/ili vakuolizacija u limfoidnim folikulima, ali su oni normalnog ovalnog oblika i iste su građe kao i vezivnotkivna stroma. Rezultati u obje skupine pilića pokazuju da nije riječ samo o blagim do srednje jakim promjenama u burzama nego i o tendenciji oporavka burza i njihove repopulacije limfocitima. Iako vakcina GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF u cjelosti ne slijedi zahtjeve Europske farmakopeje, može se smatrati neškodljivom živom vakcinom intermedijarnog tipa protiv zarazne bolesti burze. Ključne riječi: zarazna bolest burze, GUMBOKAL IM FORTE SPF, živa vakcina, neškodljivost 140