Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko

Similar documents
Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Lea Ragaini Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko

Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Lea Ragaini Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko

Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Gaura (Gaura lindheimeri Siskiyou Pink )

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberrelic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Lady s Mantle (Alchemilla mollis Auslese )

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Dead Nettle (Lamium maculatum Shell Pink )

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Periwinkle (Vinca Tall Rosea Mix )

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Catnip (Nepeta cataria)

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of English Ivy (Hedera helix)

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Mogeton 25 WP (Quinoclamine) on Coral Bells (Heuchera sanguinea Firefly )

Efficacy of Management Tools for Fusarium Root & Crown Rot Final Objective

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Acetamiprid, Dinotefuran, Thiomethoxam, Chenopodium, Buprofezin, and Flonicamid Efficacy and Phytotoxicity Trial: Citrus Mealybug (Planoccocus citri)

2014 Turfgrass Proceedings

2015 Turfgrass Proceedings

2015 Turfgrass Proceedings

Comparing the Efficiency of Different Foliarly-Applied Zinc Formulations on Peach and Pistachio Trees by Using 68 Zn Isotope

2007 Powdery Mildew of Cantaloupe Fungicide Trial

EPA Reg. No (Except California) REVISED USE DIRECTIONS FOR CREEPING BENTGRASS, PERENNIAL RYEGRASS AND BERMUDAGRASS

20 Turfgrass Proceedings

Managing transplant size and advancing field maturity of fresh tomatoes and peppers

Aphid Management on Head Lettuce Using Imidacloprid and Foliar Insecticides

Final 2013 Delaware Soybean Board Report

12. ZINC - The Major Minor

Evaluation of Manganese Fertility of Upland Cotton in the Lower Colorado Valley

2016 FUNGICIDE GUIDE FOR BURLEY AND DARK TOBACCO

2008 Turfgrass Proceedings

CONTROL OF BLACK TURFGRASS ATAENIUS ADULTS AND GRUBS WITH ADULTICIDES AND LARVICIDES

Research Abstract for the CALIFORNIA LEAFY GREENS RESEARCH PROGRAM April 1, 2012 March 31, 2013

MANAGING MARESTAIL AND GIANT RAGWEED IN WHEAT

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2011

The effect of surfactant foliar applications on tomato, pepper, watermelon, and cabbage transplant growth. C.S. Vavrina Vegetable Horticulturist

University of Idaho Pink Rot Fungicide Trial Powdery Scab Fungicide Trial

PSB FIELD ASSAYS. 1 Trial No. 23 Ref no: IPL/KHA/SH/PPX/54 2 Product PS Bacteria 2 % A.S. 3 Crop Name Sorghum

ORGANIC ROMAINE HEARTS LATE SUMMER 2017 SALINAS, CA

Feasibility of Reducing Slug Damage in Cabbage: Part II

ZINC FERTILIZER GROUP / MISSTOF GROEP 2. Reg. No. B4255 Act/Wet No 36 of/van 1947

Lime Fertilizer Interactions Affecting Vegetable Crop Production' Delbert D. Hemphill, Jr., and T. L. ABSTRACT

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Final Trial Report. western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis - FRANOC

Knockdown and Residual Control of Bagrada Bug With Foliar Insecticides in Broccoli: 2013 Efficacy Report

2012 Turfgrass Proceedings

THE IMPACT OF FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF NITROGEN AND BORON ON 'HASS' AVOCADO FRUIT SET

PROJECT TITLE: Evaluation of Preemergence Herbicides for Annual Weed Control in Young Blueberry Fields (Final Report Research).

Nutrient Deficiency in Anthuriums

2008 PMR REPORT #ESOYSMI4 SECTION E: CEREAL, FORAGE CROPS, and OILSEEDS Insect Pests

LYGUS BUG MANAGEMENT IN SEED ALFALFA. Eric T. Natwick and M. Lopez 1 ABSTRACT

Treatments protocol # Sponsor Materials Timing/interval FP/ac Tol 1 lab non-treated Y 2 lab Thiram 65WSB 14d 3.0 lb Y

2013 Turfgrass Proceedings

CHEMICAL SAFETY IN THE GREENHOUSE

2016 Processing Onion Weed Control Trial

Water Quality and Treatments

Influence of Herbicides on the Spring Transition of Bermudagrass Greens Overseeded with Perennial Ryegrass

How to Conduct On-Farm Trials. Dr. Jim Walworth Dept. of Soil, Water & Environmental Sci. University of Arizona

Balance GT/Balance Bean/LL Systems in Soybeans at Rochester, MN Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Annette Kyllo and Matthew Bauer

1999 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

Bio-efficacy of Clofentezine 50SC against two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch on rose cv. First Red in polyhouse

Results and Discussion

grow Fertiliser for the Future grow is a novel foliar fertilizer concept meeting the

2007 Turfgrass Proceedings

Controlled Release Fertilizer Evaluations 1998

WATERMELON RESPONSE TO COPPER AND A COMPLETE MICRONUTRIENT SOURCE1

2012 Final Report. Evaluation of Aminocyclopyrachlor for Saltcedar Control

Objective: How it Was Done:

Reducing russeting of organically grown Elstar to increase quality

2008 Turfgrass Proceedings

Nutrient Uptake Trial: Determination of Nutrient Uptake in Grapevines

REMEMBER as we go through this exercise: Science is the art of making simple things complicated!

Objective: Procedures:

Evaluation of new fungicides as potential management tools for Phytophthora crown and root rot on peppers

2011 Lygus Bug Management Trial in Blackeyes Kearney Research and Extension Center, Parlier, CA C.A. Frate 1, S.C. Mueller and P.B.

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

COPPER TOXICITY IN WOODY ORNAMENTALS

Evaluation of lime sulfur and sulforix for control of Exobasidium and Phomopsis diseases of blueberry and vinifera wine grapes, respectively

Fungicide control of apple scab: 2005 trial results

Management Program for Whiteflies on Propagated Ornamentals

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tidewater Ag. Res. & Ext. Ctr.

APPLE / CONTROL OF APPLE FRUIT MOTH AND CODLING MOTH ON APPLE

Evaluation of Sclerotia Germination Stimulants for White Rot Control

Cultivar Specific Nitrogen Management Profiles For Irrigated Process Varieties Inkster, ND 2009

Progress Report. Evaluation of Aminocyclopyrachlor for Saltcedar Control

AZOMITE and Coffee & Cacao

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

5. Plant Physiology/Chemistry Section

2018 FUNGICIDE GUIDE FOR BURLEY AND DARK TOBACCO

Minnesota State Florists Bulletin

Investigation into the etiology of decline of Raywood ash in Northern California

Efficacy of Amincocyclopyrachlor for Annual Broomweed Control

EFFICACY OF NEW PESTICIDES AGAINST SIXSPOTTED MITE EOTETRANYCHUS SEXMACULATUS (RILEY) (ACARI: TETRANYCHIDAE) ON AVOCADOS

INSECTICIDE EFFICACY TRIAL FOR THRIPS CONTROL IN DRY BULB ONIONS

Roses with Vitazyme application

Soil 4234 Guest Lecture

PISTACHIO MICRONUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

2013 Turfgrass Proceedings

Using silicon, Stimplex and plant resistance in pumpkin production systems to reduce plant disease loss

Trace Yet Substantial

Transcription:

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Treasure Flower (Gazania linearis Colorado Gold ) By Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko Project: Interregional Research Project #4 Project Number 23228A August 30, 2004 Acknowledgements: Ahmet Gulcu Donors/Supporters: CDFA Minor Crops Research Grant, Project 2: Enhancement of the Western Region IR-4 Program to Address California Needs Green Leaf Perennials, Lancaster, PA UC Davis Environmental Horticulture IR4 Center Department of Environmental Horticulture University of California One Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616 http://envhort.ucdavis.edu/ir4

IR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM (Please type or print) 1. INVESTIGATOR (Name, Address, Phone#): Dr. Heiner Lieth Department of Environmental Horticulture University of California One Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616 Ph 530-752-7198, FAX 530-752-1819 Email: jhlieth@ucdavis.edu LOCATION OF TRIAL: TRIAL TYPE:(check one) FIELD CONTAINER X GREENHOUSE INTERIORSCAPE 2. PESTICIDE: COMMON NAME: 6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid A 4 A 7 FORMULATION: 1.8% + 1.8% (w/w) BATCH NO.: EPA REG. NO. 27135 PRODUCT: Fascination MFG: Valent 3. USE INFORMATION: COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANT: Treasure Flower Gazania linearis Colorado Gold REASON: enhanced branching of potted crops SOIL TYPE OR TYPE OF POTTING MIX: UC Mix % SAND 35 % SILT % CLAY % OM 65 % ph 6.5 SEEDING DATE EMERGENCE DATE TRANSPLANTING DATE 4/18/04 PLANT OR POT SPACING 6 ROW SPACING 6 POT SIZE 6-inch PLOT SIZE 50 sq. ft. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN randomized complete block NO.OF REPS 9 (3 blocks) 4. APPLICATION PARAMETERS: TYPE OF APPLICATION: foliar NO. OF APPLICATIONS 2 APPLICATION TYPE manual spray bottle NOZZLE TYPE/SIZE NOZZLE PRESSURE DELIVERY RATE CALIBRATION DATE(S) 5. APPLICATION SUMMARY: APPL.DATE RATES (ppm)* GROWTH STAGE 7/19/04 0, 125 (0.5X), 250 (1X), 500 (2X) 13 weeks post-transplant 8/09/04 0, 125 (0.5X), 250 (1X), 500 (2X) 16 weeks post-transplant *Be sure to provide units 2

IR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM (Please type or print) 6. RAINFALL/IRRIGATION RECORDS: INCLUDE RAINFALL/IRRIGATION INFORMATION (printouts, IR-4 forms, etc.) Plants were watered as needed (at least once daily) with half-strength Hoagland s solution 7. OTHER PESTICIDES, FERTILIZER, LIME AND ADJUVANTS USED: PRODUCT Pylon AMOUNT DATE 7/21/04 PRODUCT Flagship AMOUNT DATE 7/29/04 PRODUCT Pedestal and Pyrenone AMOUNT DATE 8/12/04 8. NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF METHODS AND RESULTS: (Use more pages if needed) Materials and Methods Plant Material and Culture. Young plants of Gazania linearis Colorado Gold were received from Yoder Bros. on 4/12/04. These were transplanted to 4-inch pots containing UC Mix on 4/18/04 and maintained in a greenhouse under natural day length for 13 weeks until the experiment began on July 19, 2004. Prior to the experiment, the plants were repotted into 6-inch pots containing UC Mix. For the experiment, the plants were transferred to a greenhouse under natural day length with day/night temperatures of 78 F/65 F (26 C/18 C) (Figure 1). The plants were watered as needed (at least once daily) during the 6-week experiment with halfstrength Hoagland s solution. Applications of pesticides as part of a normal pest management program were made as needed (see No. 7 above). Experimental Procedure. Thirty-six plants were randomly chosen and individually tagged for treatment with 0, 125 ppm (0.5X), 250 ppm (1X) or 500 ppm (2X) Fascination with 9 replicates per treatment. These dosages were prescribed in an IR4 Fascination protocol dated 6/04 (Appendix A). The plants received the first of two foliar spray applications of the designated treatments on July 19, 2004 using manual spray bottles to spray leaves to runoff. The second application was made 21 days later on August 09, 2004. The plants were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 3 blocks and 3 treatment replicates per block. Phytotoxicity and efficacy measurements were taken at day 0 (July 19, 2004), day 21 (August 9, 2004) and day 42 (August 30, 2004). Phytotoxicity evaluations were based on a numerical rating scale of 0 (no injury) to 10 (complete kill) (Table 1). Efficacy measurements consisted of overall plant height (cm) and width (cm). In addition, the number of flowers per plant was counted. Statistical Analysis. The data were analyzed using Proc GLM of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS). The phytotoxicity and change in mean value from the starting plant height and width were analyzed for significant differences using t-tests. Results Phytotoxicity Index. Fascination at all application rates had no effect on phytotoxicity index for Gazania linearis Colorado Gold as compared to control (0 ppm) (Figure 2, Appendix B). Efficacy. Fascination at all application rates had no effect on plant height (Figures 3 and 3a, Table 2). The plant width increase at 3 weeks was significantly greater for the 125 ppm treatment than the 250 and 500 ppm treatments, but not the control (Figure 4, Table 2). Flowering was not affected by Fascination (Figure 5, Appendix C) as compared to control (0 ppm). 3

Discussion Phytotoxicity. Fascination at all rates tested caused no phytotoxicity symptoms on Gazania linearis Colorado Gold. Efficacy. Foliar application of Fascination did not affect the growth of G. linearis Colorado Gold. Evaluation of branching was not possible nondestructively. In this experiment, flowering and plant size were evaluated as indicators of branching. Based on this, we find that Fascination is not effective for increasing branching in G. linearis Colorado Gold. 9. GOOD RESEARCH PRACTICE STATEMENT: I acknowledge that I have read and followed the IR-4 Research protocol and completed this trial following good agricultural practice, or reported any deviations (note any changes from authorized protocol in narrative). SIGNATURE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR DATE 4

Table 1. Numerical plant damage rating scale used for phytotoxicity determinations. Rating Description of plant damage 0 No damage 1 No visible damage but unintended (non-permanent) impact 2 Slight leaf/tissue damage (curling leaves, necrosis, etc.) 3 Marginal chlorosis on some leaves (damage on up to 10% of plant) 4 10% 20% of plant damaged 5 Significant damage to much of plant (30% - 40%) 6 40% 60% of plant damaged 7 Chlorosis or necrosis on most of plant (60% - 70%) 8 Abscised leaves, branch dieback 9 Tissue severely damaged (80% - 100% of plant) 10 Complete kill Air Temperatures - Greenhouse 184 95 90 85 Temperature (F) 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 7/12/2004 7/17/2004 7/22/2004 7/27/2004 8/1/2004 8/6/2004 8/11/2004 Figure 1. Greenhouse temperatures during the experiment to evaluate the effects of Fascination on Gazania linearis Colorado Gold. 5

Phytotoxicity index 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Control 125 ppm (0.5X) 250 ppm (1X) 500 ppm (2X) 0 3 6 Duration of experiment (weeks) Figure 2. Phytotoxicity Index for Gazania linearis Colorado Gold treated with 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination. SE bars shown. n=9. See Table 1 for explanation of values. 6

20 Plant height (cm) 15 10 5 0 Control 125 ppm (0.5X) 250 ppm (1X) 500 ppm (2X) 0 3 6 Duration of experiment (weeks) Figure 3. Plant height of Gazania linearis Colorado Gold treated with 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination. SE bars shown. n=9. Table 2. Average increase (cm) of height and width for plants in the control and Fascination treatments for Gazania linearis Colorado Gold. Different letters within a column indicate significant differences between different treatments (P < 0.05). Means ± SE (n=9). Height increase (cm) Width increase (cm) over 3 weeks over 6 weeks over 3 weeks over 6 weeks Control 2.44 ± 1.04 a 2.22 ± 0.71 a 9.22 ± 1.04 ab 11.89 ± 1.12 a 125 ppm 3.78 ± 1.06 a 1.89 ± 1.33 a 12.22 ± 1.70 a 13.89 ± 3.50 a 250 ppm 0.63 ± 0.74 a 1.38 ± 0.61 a 8.63 ± 1.18 b 11.50 ± 1.55 a 500 ppm 2.78 ± 1.09 a 3.89 ± 0.73 a 8.11 ± 1.02 b 9.89 ± 0.78 a 7

Control 125 ppm 250 ppm 500 ppm Block A Control 125 ppm 250 ppm 500 ppm Block B Control 125 ppm 250 ppm 500 ppm Block C Figure 3a. Gazania linearis Colorado Gold plants 6 weeks after 2 foliar applications of 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination (Week 0 and Week 3). 8

Plant width (cm) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Control 125 ppm (0.5X) 250 ppm (1X) 500 ppm (2X) 0 3 6 Duration of experiment (weeks) Figure 4. Plant width of Gazania linearis Colorado Gold treated with 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination. SE bars shown. n=9. 9

Number of flowers 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Control 125 ppm (0.5X) 250 ppm (1X) 500 ppm (2X) 0 3 6 Duration of experiment (weeks) Figure 5. Number of flowers per plant for Gazania linearis Colorado Gold treated with 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination. SE bars shown. n=9. 10

Appendix A: GROWTH ENHANCEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL PLANTS WITH FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF 6-BENZYL ADENINE + GIBBERELLIC ACID (FASCINATION) Date: 6/04 Ornamental Protocol Number: 670 General label directions: Refer to product label or Technical Bulletin. Research program: Pest(s)/Plants Plants other than labeled species. Pesticide (common name and trade name): Refer to treatment list shown below. For label, material & if needed, spray surfactant contact: Valent USA, Joe Chamberlin, 770-985-0303, jcham@valent.com Plot size (must be adequate to reflect actual use condition) Replicates Minimum of 4 Treatment Units Controls (untreated controls to be included in all experiments) Application: FASCINATION Dosages - 1/2x 125 ppm or 0.125 pt/5 gal. 1x 250 ppm or 0.25 pt/5 gal. 2x 500 ppm or 0.5 pt/5 gal. Active Ingredient: 6-benzyl adenine + gibberellic acid (FASCINATION). Volume - Minimum of 100 gal/a. Timing - 2 Applications, 21 day spray interval. Record number of branches and length, then increased branching, increased extension and crop safety at 7, 14, 21 (then 2 nd appl.), 28 and 42 DAT. Reports: Method of application: Treatments should be applied according to product label instructions. application equipment consistent with conventional commercial equipment. Report completely on experimental design and method of application. Report plant size height x width before treatment and throughout the experiment. Weather Maintain temperature and precipitation (including irrigation) data. Soil type Identify soil type used in experimental area. Product When submitting data, include EPA registration number of product used. Efficacy Data should include percent control as well as an indication that infestation was light, heavy, etc. Record all application and evaluation dates. Phytotoxicity Record phytotoxicity data at all rates. Use a 0-10 scale. 0 = No Phytotoxicity 10 = complete kill. Please direct questions to: Dr. Robert M. Herrick, IR-4 Project, 681 US Highway #1 South, North Brunswick, NJ Phone: (732) 932-9575, Ext. 629. 11

Appendix B: PHYTOTOXICITY REPORT FORM Gazania Data Phyto Phyto Phyto Rate Rate Rate Fascination Treatment Block Rep 7/19/04 8/9/04 8/30/04 Control A 1 0 1 3 Control A 2 0 1 1 Control A 3 0 2 2 Control B 1 0 1 1 Control B 2 0 1 0 Control B 3 0 0 3 Control C 1 0 1 1 Control C 2 0 0 1 Control C 3 0 0 2 Control Mean 0.00 0.78 1.56 Control Std Dev 0.00 0.67 1.01 125 ppm A 1 0 1 1 125 ppm A 2 0 1 1 125 ppm A 3 1 0 1 125 ppm B 1 0 2 2 125 ppm B 2 0 0 3 125 ppm B 3 1 2 3 125 ppm C 1 0 0 2 125 ppm C 2 0 1 2 125 ppm C 3 1 3 10 125 ppm Mean 0.33 1.11 2.78 125 ppm Std Dev 0.50 1.05 2.82 250 ppm A 1 0 1 2 250 ppm A 2 0 1 2 250 ppm A 3 0 2 1 250 ppm B 1 0 0 2 250 ppm B 2 1 1 0 250 ppm B 3 0 1 2 250 ppm C 1 0 5 2 250 ppm C 2 0 2 1 250 ppm C 3 0 1 3 250 ppm Mean 0.11 1.56 1.67 250 ppm Std Dev 0.33 1.42 0.87 500 ppm A 1 1 1 3 500 ppm A 2 1 1 1 500 ppm A 3 0 0 3 500 ppm B 1 0 1 1 500 ppm B 2 0 2 3 500 ppm B 3 0 2 2 500 ppm C 1 0 0 3 500 ppm C 2 0 1 2 500 ppm C 3 0 1 2 500 ppm Mean 0.22 1.00 2.22 500 ppm Std Dev 0.44 0.71 0.83 NOTE: DEFINE MEASUREMENT OF PHYTOTOXICITY, OR INDEX OF INJURY (0=NO INJURY, 10=COMPLETE KILL) (See Table 1) 12

Appendix C: EFFICACY REPORT FORM Gazania Data Plant Plant Plant Plant Plant Plant Height Height Height Width Width Width # Flowers # Flowers # Flowers Fascination (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) Treatment Block Rep 7/19/2004 8/9/2004 8/30/2004 7/19/2004 8/9/2004 8/30/2004 7/19/2004 8/9/2004 8/30/2004 Control A 1 9 17 14.5 31 41.5 41 1 22 9 Control A 2 15 20.5 19.5 35.5 43.75 48 11 39 26 Control A 3 16.5 17.5 19 33.5 44.5 47.5 8 25 19 Control B 1 16 15.5 16 32 41.25 42.25 10 15 13 Control B 2 14 12 15 29.75 37.25 42.5 5 32 17 Control B 3 14.5 19.5 16 27.5 37.5 40 7 22 35 Control C 1 16.5 14.5 18.5 34.25 42.5 45.5 18 24 13 Control C 2 14.5 17 15.5 31.5 38.25 40.5 5 28 19 Control C 3 17.5 21.5 19.5 32.5 44.75 48 5 21 14 Control Mean 14.83 17.22 17.06 31.94 41.25 43.92 7.78 25.33 18.33 Control Std Dev 2.47 3.00 2.04 2.41 2.95 3.34 4.87 6.96 7.92 125 ppm A 1 15.5 18 15 37.5 45.5 65.5 7 20 3 125 ppm A 2 14 17.5 17.5 29 42 44 12 16 22 125 ppm A 3 10.5 17 12 30 48.5 45.5 3 9 7 125 ppm B 1 12 14 14 31.5 43 38.5 1 28 12 125 ppm B 2 9 17 20 29 46 49.5 12 26 23 125 ppm B 3 15.5 18 16 31.5 47.5 48.5 8 12 8 125 ppm C 1 15 19.5 17.5 32 47 46.5 12 54 28 125 ppm C 2 14.5 21.5 18 35 42.5 43.5 2 22 4 125 ppm C 3 13 11 7 28.75 31.75 26 5 10 0 125 ppm Mean 13.22 17.06 15.22 31.58 43.75 45.28 6.89 21.89 11.89 125 ppm Std Dev 2.31 3.04 3.89 2.97 5.06 10.37 4.43 13.82 10.04 250 ppm A 1 10 13 17.5 32.5 40.5 43.75 0 16 12 250 ppm A 2 22.5 18 17.5 39 45.5 47.25 5 45 25 250 ppm A 3 17 13.5 16.5 33.5 41.5 43.5 8 28 20 250 ppm B 1 13.5 17.5 16 30 43 41 6 40 17 250 ppm B 2 15 17.5 17.5 32.5 41 45.5 4 15 6 250 ppm B 3 14.5 18.5 18 31.5 42 48.5 5 16 26 250 ppm C 1 13.5 15 12.5 26 36 35.5 4 15 3 250 ppm C 2 13.5 15.5 16.5 36 45.5 49 1 20 5 250 ppm C 3 15.5 16 15.5 30.75 38.5 41 2 33 44 250 ppm Mean 15.00 16.06 16.39 32.42 41.50 43.89 3.89 25.33 17.56 250 ppm Std Dev 3.40 1.98 1.67 3.67 3.06 4.31 2.52 11.64 13.07 500 ppm A 1 7.5 22 19.5 30 41.5 43.75 2 43 22 500 ppm A 2 17.5 20 20.5 31.5 45.5 44 10 24 11 500 ppm A 3 12.5 15.5 17 29.75 35.5 43 13 41 19 500 ppm B 1 15.5 16 16 30.5 41.5 42.5 8 16 18 500 ppm B 2 16 20.5 20.5 31 37.5 39.75 6 2 8 500 ppm B 3 12 12.5 16 29.5 37.5 38 4 30 23 500 ppm C 1 15.5 13 16 34 41.25 42.5 9 35 27 500 ppm C 2 18 17 20 39 42 45.5 9 41 24 500 ppm C 3 12.5 16 18 38 42.5 43 3 23 28 500 ppm Mean 14.11 16.94 18.17 32.58 40.53 42.44 7.11 28.33 20.00 500 ppm Std Dev 3.31 3.29 1.98 3.62 3.10 2.27 3.62 13.58 6.82 13