Surgical Metabolism Section, Surgery Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD

Similar documents
C.W. Nutting & J.S. Zager on behalf of the DCTH P3 Investigators

The 2010 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium Oral Abstract Session: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel and Hepatobilliary Tract

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Case Presentations

MANAGEMENT OF COLORECTAL METASTASES. Robert Warren, MD. The Postgraduate Course in General Surgery March 22, /22/2011

Colon Cancer Liver Metastases: Liver-Directed Therapy

Management of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Expanding the Horizon

Update on Surgical Management of NETs

NEUROENDOCRINE CARCINOID TUMORS PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS

Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cancer

Liver Tumors. Prof. Dr. Ahmed El - Samongy

Chemosaturation: Indication, Technique and Outcome

SIRT in the Management of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Staging & Current treatment of HCC

Intra-arterial Targeted Delivery of Gemcitabine in Treatment of Patients with Loco-regional Pancreatic Tumors

Clinical Commissioning Policy Proposition:

Chemosaturation with Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion for Unresectable Isolated Hepatic Metastases from Sarcoma

Delcath Investor Presentation (OTCQB: DCTH)

Overview. What s New in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer? Lots! Steven J. Cohen, M.D. Fox Chase Cancer Center September 17, 2013

Delcath Investor Presentation (OTCQB: DCTH)

Management of colorectal cancer liver metastases

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan for unresectable liver metastasis

Surgical Therapy of GEP-NET: An Overview

Pancreas Quizzes c. Both A and B a. Directly into the blood stream (not using ducts)

Surgical Management of Pulmonary Metastases. Dr AG Jacobs Principal Specialist Dept Cardiothoracic Surgery Steve Biko Academic Hospital

Regional Therapy for Management of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastrointestinal Malignancies

RCC in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs): Diagnosis and Management

Pancreatic Cancer and Radiation Therapy

SBRT and hypofractionated RT for HCC patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment

State of the art management of Colorectal Liver Metastasis: an interplay of Chemotherapy and Surgical options

Trends and Comparative Effectiveness in Treatment of Stage IV Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Jose Ramos. Role of Surgery in isolated hepatic metastasis from breast carcinoma, melanoma or sarcoma

INTRAARTERIAL TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES. Dr. Joan Falcó Interventional Radiology UDIAT. Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí

Index. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 15 (2006) Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Radiation Therapy for Liver Malignancies

Current Treatment of Colorectal Metastases. Dr. Thavanathan Surgical Grand Rounds February 1, 2005

Delcath Investor Presentation (OTCQB: DCTH)

Table Selected Clinical Trials of Anti-Angiogenesis Therapy in Gynecologic Malignancies

SELECTIVE INTERNAL RADIATION THERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF LIVER CANCER

Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Presley Regional Trauma Center Department of Surgery University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis, Tennessee

HIPEC Controversies in the Indications and Application of Regional Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies

Pediatric Liver Tumors and Transplantation. Northwest Regional Pediatric Live Disease Symposium, Seattle WA, April 12, 2008

Hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine tumors: treatment options and outcomes of local patients treated with radioembolization

Cholangiocarcinoma. GI Practice Guideline. Michael Sanatani, MD, FRCPC (Medical Oncologist) Barbara Fisher, MD, FRCPC (Radiation Oncologist)

LIVER DIRECTED THERAPY IN UVEAL MELANOMA- THE SOUTHAMPTON EXPERIENCE

Management of Liver Metastasis from Colorectal Carcinoma. Aisha White, M.D. SUNY Downstate Division of Transplantation

Embolotherapy for Cholangiocarcinoma: 2016 Update

Antiangiogenics are effective treatments in NETs

The Surgical Management of Colorectal Metastases

Adverse effects of Immunotherapy. Asha Nayak M.D

Tips and tricks. Camillo Aliberti, Massimo Tilli

Intra arterial ports: complex, demanding but rewarding

Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases State of the Art

TRANSEARTERIAL CHEMO- EMBOLIZATION FOR HEPATIC METASTASES FROM NEURO-ENDOCINE NEOPLASIA AND HEPATOMA DR SAMIA AHMAD

Regional Therapy for Management of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Recent Advances in Gastrointestinal Cancers

Phase 1 Trial of ALN-VSP in Cancers Involving the Liver. Annual Meeting of the Controlled Release Society August 2, 2011

LIVER DIRECTED THERAPIES FOR PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE METASTASES

Surgical Approaches to Pulmonary Metastases

Regional Therapy for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Janette Durham, MD Professor of Radiology University of Colorado School of Medicine

Gastrinoma: Medical Management. Haley Gallup

III Sessione I risultati clinici

Management of Pancreatic Islet Cell Tumors

Treatment strategy of metastatic rectal cancer

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Phase I Trial of Siplizumab in CD-2 Positive Lymphoproliferative Disease

SBRT in Pancreas Cancer Role of The Radiosurgery Society

Pancreatic Cancer Where are we?

Pancreas Cancer Update Systemic Treatments

Delcath Investor Presentation (NASDAQ: DCTH)

NEW SURGICAL APPROACHES TO MELANOMA THERAPY

General summary GENERAL SUMMARY

NET und NEC. Endoscopic and oncologic therapy

Chemosaturatie. Ingrid Veldema

The impact of extrahepatic disease among patients undergoing liver-directed therapy for neuroendocrine liver metastasis

PNET 3/7/2015. GI and Pancreatic NETs. The Postgraduate Course in Breast and Endocrine Surgery. Decision Tree. GI and Pancreatic NETs.

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Malignancies

Treatment of 200 Locally Advanced (Stage III) Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients with Irreversible Electroporation: Safety and Efficacy

Intra-arterial chemotherapy for patients with

Workup of a Solid Liver Lesion

Selection Criteria and Insertion of SIRT into HCC Treatment Guidelines

Pancreaticoduodenectomy the anatomy and the surgical approaches

Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival, measured as the time in weeks from randomization to date of death due to any cause.

New Biological and Immunological Therapies for Cancer

Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Closer Look at the Characteristics of These Diverse Tumors

Management of Rare Liver Tumours

A PHASE 1 STUDY OF TRC105 (ANTI- ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS

Visceral aneurysm. Diagnosis and Interventions M.NEDEVSKA

Oncology General Principles L A U R I E S I M A R D B R E A S T S U R G I C A L O N C O L O G Y F E L L O W D E C E M B E R

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

MEDICAL POLICY. SUBJECT: ISOLATED LIMB PERFUSION and INFUSION

Colorectal Liver Metastases Metachronous

Management of Patients with Suspected Cholangiocarcinoma CLINICAL GUIDELINES

Targeted Radiation +/- Biologics News Briefing

STRICTURES OF THE BILE DUCTS Session No.: 5. Andrea Tringali Digestive Endoscopy Unit Catholic University Rome - Italy

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2010 Highlights Radiotherapy

Where are we with radiotherapy for biliary tract cancers?

How to deal with synchronous primary and liver metastases

Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Manchester Cancer Colorectal Pathway Board: Guidelines for management of colorectal hepatic metastases

Liver surgery, acute GI tract bleeding

Transcription:

High Dose Intra-Arterial Melphalan Delivered via Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) for Patients with Unresectable Hepatic Metastases from Primary Neuroendocrine Tumors. James F. Pingpank, Richard E. Royal, Udai S. Kammula, Anthony W. Kam, Bradford J. Wood, H. Richard Alexander, Steven K. Libutti SK, Marybeth S. Hughes, Susan E. Ohl. Surgical Metabolism Section, Surgery Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Annual Meeting, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida March 29, 2008

Disclosures This research is supported by NCI Intramural Research funding and an extensive CRADA agreement between Delcath Systems, Inc. and the Surgery Branch of the NCI. Delcath double balloon catheter under IDE Intra-arterial melphalan and Delcath catheter under IND

Malignant Neuroendocrine Tumors Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasms Patients: n=183, (166 rendered NED at surgical resection) Hepatic Recurrence (first site): n=22 (76%) (Ferrone/Allen, MSKCC: JCO 2007 (25):5609) Non-Functional PNET 2.6-3.0 cases/million population At diagnosis: Node +: 44%, Metastatic Disease: 60% Median Survival M+ Disease: 1.4 years (Franko/Moser, UPMC: AHPBA 2008) Carcinoid Tumors 38.4 cases/million US population (increasing) Presence of metastatic disease varies with tumor size. Hepatic metastases will occur in 30 to 50% of patients with tumors >2cm

Survival Following Hepatic Metastasectomy for Non-Colorectal Histologies Actuarial Median Survival Author Histology N 5-yr Survival (Months) Chen et al Neuroendocrine 15 73% NR Que et al Neuroendocrine 74 73% NR Harrison et al Genitourinary 34 60% NR Jaques et al Sarcoma 14 0% 30 Harrison et al Breast/Melanoma/ 41 26% 32 Sarcoma Elias et al Breast 21 9% 26 Raab et al Breast 34 18% 27 Ochiai et al Gastric 21 19% 18 Bines et al Gastric 7 14% 15 Harrison et al Gastrointestinal 7 0% 25 NR - not reached

Management of bilobar liver metastases Carcinoid Metastases: Hepatic Artery Chemoembolization (Bloomston, OHSU: JGISurg 2007 (11): 264) Patients: n=122 Response: Radiographic (82%), Biochemical (74%), Symptomatic (92%) Median Hepatic Progression-Free Survival: 10.0 months Median Overall Survival: 33.3 months Staged Surgical Resection (Kianmanesh/Belghiti, Ann Surg 2008; 247: 659.) Patients: n=23 (of 41 patients with bilobar mets) 3 patients not resectable at laparotomy Single patient with interval hepatic progression between liver resections R0 Resection: 14 of 19 patients (74%) 2-year Disease Free and Overall Survival: 94%, 85% respectively Exclusion: High mitotic index/poorly differentiated, Rapid disease progression

Rationale for Regional Therapy Regional therapy allows dose escalation to the cancer-bearing region or organ of the body while minimizing systemic exposure and toxicity, via complete separation of the regional and systemic circulation Eliminates or significantly reduces systemic toxicity, and dose escalation of therapeutic agents is limited largely by the tissue tolerance of the perfused organ/limb - Improved efficacy/tumor response Based on its unique vascular anatomy the liver is a favorable site for delivery of regional therapy - Established tumors in liver derive the majority of blood flow from the arterial tree (tumors: 100% versus normal liver: 25%) Potential for delivery of clinically relevant levels of hyperthermia or biologic agents Allows treatment of the entire tumor burdened organ - Versus local ablative or selective embolization procedures

Isolated Hepatic Perfusion Overall Survival (n=17) 1.0 Percentage Surviving 0.8 0.6 0.4 Overall Response: 53% Median: 52m 17 Treated, 10 Died 0.2 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Survival (Months) Isolated Hepatic Perfusion Circuit Surgery 2004;136:1176-82. (Updated March, 2008)

Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion

Methods All patients treated on an NCI IRB approved phase I or phase II protocol utilizing PHP with Melphalan Inclusion Criteria: Non resectable hepatic metastases Limited, treatable (resection/xrt) extra-hepatic disease Adequate hepatic reserve (Bili<3.0, PT w/in 2 seconds of normal, LFTs <10x ULN) Exclusion Criteria Portal hypertension Inadequate hepatic vascular access

PHP Patient Demographics Neuroendocrine Tumors (n=23) Median no. of hepatic lesions 15 Mean diameter of largest lesion 4.8 cm Extrahepatic Disease 9 (39%) Subsequent Resection: n=7 Percentage hepatic replacement <25% 12 (52%) 25-50% 5 (22%) >50% 6 (26%) Primary Tumor Histology Carcinoid 6 PNET 17

Protocol Schema On Study Evaluation Interval Evaluation Post Treatment Evaluation Treatments 1 and 2 - Melphalan - Angiogram (Celiac, SMA) - GDA assessment (Treatment #1) Treatments 3 and 4 - Melphalan - Angiogram (Celiac, SMA) - GDA assessment 4-5 Weeks 4-5 Weeks 4-5 Weeks 4-5 Weeks 16 weeks

Maximum response PHP Response: Neuroendocrine Tumors (n=23) NE (Toxicity*, Incomplete Tx, OLT) 4 PD at interval evaluation 1 SD/MR 3 PR 13 CR 2 Overall Response Rate (19 patients) 15 (79%) 100 80 60 40 20 0-20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19-40 -60-80 -100 Patients

PHP Response: Neuroendocrine Tumors (n=23) NE (Toxicity*, Incomplete Tx, OLT) 4 PD at interval evaluation 1 SD/MR 3 PR 13 CR 2 Overall Response Rate (19 patients) 15 (79%) PHP Results: Neuroendocrine Tumors (68 Treatments) Mean Melphalan Dose at 3.0 mg/kg: 180 mg (126-220) Unsuccessful Therapy Sclerotic hepatic artery (n=1) MEN-1 associated Hypercalcemia (n=1) Median Length of Stay: 3 days

Procedure and Treatment Related Toxicities (68 Procedures; March 2008) Procedure Related Complications N Carcinoid Crisis 1 CNS Tumor Hemorrhage (Grade 3) 1 Tumor Lysis Syndrome (Grade 3) 1 Treatment Related Toxicity, Grade 3-4 (n,%) Hematologic Early (n=68) Late (n=68) Neutropenia 0 32 (47%) Thrombocytopenia 14 (21%) 20 (29%) Anemia 11 (16%) 10 (15%) Hepatic Transaminitis 15 (22%) 0 Hyperbilirubinemia 6 (9%) 0 Other GI **Includes single Grade 5 Cholangitis 1** 0 Gastric Ulcer/perforation 1/1 1/1 Mortality Rate (Phase I, II, III Protocols): 103 patients (2.9%), 234 procedures (1.3%) Treatment Related Deaths: Hepatic Insufficiency (n=1), Gastric Perforation (n=1), HA pseudoan. rupture (n=1)

Procedure and Treatment Related Toxicities (68 Procedures; March 2008) Procedure Related Complications N Carcinoid Crisis 1 CNS Tumor Hemorrhage (Grade 3) 1 Tumor Lysis Syndrome (Grade 3) 1 Treatment Related Toxicity, Grade 3-4 (n,%) Hematologic Early (n=68) Late (n=68) Neutropenia 0 32 (47%) Thrombocytopenia 14 (21%) 20 (29%) Anemia 11 (16%) 10 (15%) Hepatic Transaminitis 15 (22%) 0 Hyperbilirubinemia 6 (9%) 0 Other GI **Includes single Grade 5 Cholangitis 1** 0 Gastric Ulcer/perforation 1/1 1/1 Mortality Rate (Phase I, II, III Protocols): 103 patients (2.9%), 234 procedures (1.3%) Treatment Related Deaths: Hepatic Insufficiency (n=1), Gastric Perforation (n=1), HA pseudoan. rupture (n=1)

Procedure and Treatment Related Toxicities (68 Procedures; March 2008) Procedure Related Complications N Carcinoid Crisis 1 CNS Tumor Hemorrhage (Grade 3) 1 Tumor Lysis Syndrome (Grade 3) 1 Treatment Related Toxicity, Grade 3-4 (n,%) Hematologic Early (n=68) Late (n=68) Neutropenia 0 32 (47%) Thrombocytopenia 14 (21%) 20 (29%) Anemia 11 (16%) 10 (15%) Hepatic Transaminitis 15 (22%) 0 Hyperbilirubinemia 6 (9%) 0 Other GI **Includes single Grade 5 Cholangitis 1** 0 Gastric Ulcer/perforation 1/1 1/1 Mortality Rate (Phase I, II, III Protocols): 103 patients (2.9%), 234 procedures (1.3%) Treatment Related Deaths: Hepatic Insufficiency (n=1), Gastric Perforation (n=1), HA pseudoan. rupture (n=1)

Procedure and Treatment Related Toxicities (68 Procedures; March 2008) Procedure Related Complications N Carcinoid Crisis 1 CNS Tumor Hemorrhage (Grade 3) 1 Tumor Lysis Syndrome (Grade 3) 1 Treatment Related Toxicity, Grade 3-4 (n,%) Hematologic Early (n=68) Late (n=68) Neutropenia 0 32 (47%) Thrombocytopenia 14 (21%) 20 (29%) Anemia 11 (16%) 10 (15%) Hepatic Transaminitis 15 (22%) 0 Hyperbilirubinemia 6 (9%) 0 Other GI **Includes single Grade 5 Cholangitis 1** 0 Gastric Ulcer/perforation 1/1 1/1 Mortality Rate (Phase I, II, III Protocols): 103 patients (2.9%), 234 procedures (1.3%) Treatment Related Deaths: Hepatic Insufficiency (n=1), Gastric Perforation (n=1), HA pseudoan. rupture (n=1)

Hepatic Progression-Free Survival After PHP Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (n=20) Proportion Surviving 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Median: 39 months 20 Treated Censored for death from extra-hepatic disease (n=4) Not Evaluable due to hepatic toxicity (n=1) On Active Treatment (n=2) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 Survival (Months)

Overall Survival After PHP Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (n=23) Proportion Surviving 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Median: 40 months 23 Treated Patients Cause of Death Extrahepatic disease (n=2) Systemic/liver disease (n=2) Hepatic Progression (n=1) Toxicity (n=1) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 Survival (Months)

Conclusions High-dose Melphalan, delivered via intra-arterial administration is effective against hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors Tumor reduction from PHP routinely results in durable control of hormone-related symptoms An expanded, phase II multi-center confirmatory trial is planned, with stratification for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors

Metastatic Glucagonoma 54 year-old female Metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor Primary in place, treated post PHP with XRT PHP#1 PHP#2 XRT Pancreas Bed

Chemotherapy Levels During Therapy Hepatic Arterial Infusion with Venous Filtration (Patient: William A, 3/4/03, 3 mg/kg, 178 mg) PHP vs Systemic 20 Melphalan Concentration ( g/ml) 15 10 5 infusion Periphery Artery Pre-filter Post-filter 3.0 mg/kg.20 mg/kg 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (min) Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion Systemic Continuous Infusion (MTD) Alternate Melphalan Dosing Regimens Chemoembolization: 0.62 mg/kg Myeloabation: 2.5 3.5 mg/kg

Management of Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors 48 patients Carcinoid (n=36), Islet Cell (n=12) Therapy (non-randomized) Resection/Ablation: 13 pts Chemo-embolization: 18 pts Conservative therapy: 17 pts No difference in volume of hepatic disease No difference in symptom palliation Arch Surg 2006; 141: 1000-1004.