Sample size a Main finding b Main limitations

Similar documents
A multi-centre, multinational, cross-sectional, incident case control study on Factors associated with the development of

Prognostic factors of ovarian response and IVF outcome in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis Claire GAUCHE-CAZALIS, Chadi YAZBECK

A Tale of Three Hormones: hcg, Progesterone and AMH

1 - Advanced clinical course for ART with Hands on

INDICATIONS OF IVF/ICSI

Impact of Ovarian Endometrioma Per Se and Surgery on Ovarian Reserve and Pregnancy Rate in in Vitro Fertilization Cycles

(BMI)=18.0~24.9 kg/m 2 ;

Should we offer fertility preservation to all patients with severe endometriosis?

Managing infertility when adenomyosis and endometriosis co-exist

Dr Manuela Toledo - Procedures in ART -

Ivf day 6 estradiol level

LOW RESPONDERS. Poor Ovarian Response, Por

% Oocyte Donation Pregnancyes (days 3)

Assisted Reproduction. By Dr. Afraa Mahjoob Al-Naddawi

In Vitro Fertilization in Clomiphene-Resistant Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

NEW PATIENT DATA SHEET Please complete as best you can. It is not necessary to have all information before speaking with a doctor. PATIENT INFORMATION

Honorary Fellow of the Royal College of Obs. & Gyn. First Indian to receive FIGO s Distinguished Merit Award for Services towards women s health.

ENDOMETRIOSIS PATIENTS: OOCYTE QUALITY AND QUANTITY. Grants for research received during the. last three years from Ferring and Merck-Serono

Fertility 101. About SCRC. A Primary Care Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Infertility. Definition of Infertility. Dr.

Poor & Hyper responders: what is the best approach?

Does previous response to clomifene citrate influence the selection of gonadotropin dosage given in subsequent superovulation treatment cycles?

The serum estradiol/oocyte ratio in patients with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins

Hana Park, Chung-Hoon Kim, Eun-Young Kim, Jei-Won Moon, Sung-Hoon Kim, Hee-Dong Chae, Byung-Moon Kang

NICE fertility guidelines. Hemlata Thackare MPhil MSc MRCOG Deputy Medical Director London Women s Clinic

Thrombosis during assisted reproduction. Scott Nelson Muirhead Chair in Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Infertility. Thomas Lloyd and Samera Dean

PRETREATMENT ASSESSMENT & MANAGEMENT (MODULE 1 B) March, 2018

Prepare your first visit to Sakthi Fertility

Saudi Journal of Medicine (SJM)

Female Consultation Questionnaire

Agonist versus antagonist in ICSI cycles: a randomized trial and cost effectiveness analysis Badrawi A, Zaki S, Al-Inany H, Ramzy A M, Hussein M

Number of oocytes and live births in IVF

Cancer Risks of Ovulation Induction

Interpreting follicular Progesterone: Late follicular Progesterone to Estradiol ratio is not influenced by protocols or gonadotropins used

POST - DOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMME IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE. Anatomy : Male and Female genital tract

FIVNAT-CH Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Reproduktionsmedizin Société Suisse de Médecine de la Reproduction

NGUYEN QUOC ANH. M.D., M.Sc. Tu Du Hospital Vietnam

Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as predictor of ovarian reserve

Fertility treatment and referral criteria for tertiary level assisted conception

Individualized treatment based on ovarian reserve markers

The effect of adding oral oestradiol to progesterone as luteal phase support in ART cycles a randomized controlled study

NaProTechnology. An Integrated Approach to Infertility. Tracy Parnell. Geneva 2005

Risk of miscarriage in women with endometriosis undergoing IVF fresh cycles: a retrospective cohort study

Effect of ovarian stimulation on oocyte quality and embryonic aneuploidy: a prospective, randomised controlled trial

Fertility Policy. December Introduction

FERTILITY PRESERVATION IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS: FOLLICULAR BIOMARKERS IN LETROZOLE ASSOCIATED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION

Minimising IVF related mortality and morbidity. Scott Nelson Muirhead Professor in Obstetrics & Gynaecology

JMSCR Vol 06 Issue 09 Page September 2018

LH activity administration during the

MedStar Health, Inc. POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL Policy Number: PA.018.MH Last Review Date: 08/04/2016 Effective Date: 01/01/2017

Optimizing Fertility and Wellness After Cancer. Kat Lin, MD, MSCE

Getting Pregnant, Staying Pregnant & Post Pregnancy by Siobhán Boucher.

Influence ovarian stimulation on oocyte and embryo quality. Prof.Dr. Bart CJM Fauser

Fibroids not encroaching the endometrial cavity and IVF success rate: a prospective study

Evaluation of ovarian response prediction according to age and serum AMH levels in IVF cycles: a retrospective analysis

Prediction modeling for live birth in in vitro fertilization. Kristen E. Gray. A dissertation. submitted in partial fulfillment of the

EVALUATING THE INFERTILE PATIENT-COUPLES. Stephen Thorn, MD

Understanding IVF Processes in Surrogacy

Surgery and Infertility

Manish Banker. Declared receipt of grants; member of a company advisory board, board of director or similar group

Fertility assessment and assisted conception

Low AMH and natural conception. Dr. Phil Boyle Galway, Ireland IIRRM Annual Meeting, 7 th August 2013

CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION AND OOCYTE RETRIEVAL : CLINICAL INPUTS. DR Priyanka Sinha MD OB-GYN MUMBAI, INDIA

Hold On To Your Dreams

Neil Goodman, MD, FACE

Natural Cycle & Mild stimulation IVF/ICSI in women with Poor Ovarian Response (POR)

East and North Hertfordshire CCG. Fertility treatment and referral criteria for tertiary level assisted conception

T39: Fertility Policy Checklist

lbt lab tests t Conrolled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Dr Soheila Ansaripour

Bumiputera Sarawak Bumiputera Sabah. Others Foreigner. Had previous natural pregnancy Previous IVF pregnancies. IVF live births.

Prof. Antonio Pellicer

Dr. Ernesto Bosch Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad Valencia, Spain. Declared no potential conflict of interest

Infertility treatment

Infertility Clinical Guideline

COMPARING AMH, AFC AND FSH FOR PREDICTING HIGH OVARIAN RESPONSE IN WOMEN UNDERGOING ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 22 September 2010

IVF Protocols: Hyper & Hypo-Responders, Implantation

Follicle-stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone ratio as an independent predictor of response to controlled ovarian stimulation

Endometriosis, a well-known cause

Predictive factors of successful pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology in women aged 40 years and older

Potentials for iatrogenic ovarian hyporresponse following

ERA. Endometrial Receptivity Analysis. Patented since

Luteal phase rescue after GnRHa triggering Progesterone and Estradiol

Infertility. Review and Update Clifford C. Hayslip MD Intrauterine Inseminations

Impact of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization outcomes: an evaluation of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Database

Haringey CCG Fertility Policy April 2014

Oocyte Freezing and Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation:

Are all-freeze cycles & frozen-thawed embryo transfers improving IVF outcomes?

Menstruation-free interval and ongoing pregnancy in IVF using GnRH antagonists

Dr Guy Gudex. Director Repromed. 17:00-17:30 Recent Advances in Fertility Management

Infertility F REQUENTLY A SKED Q UESTIONS. Q: Is infertility a common problem?

Frozen-thawed embryo transfer is associated with a significantly reduced incidence of ectopic pregnancy

Vanessa N. Weitzman, M.D., Lawrence Engmann, M.D., Andrea DiLuigi, M.D., Donald Maier, M.D., John Nulsen, M.D., and Claudio Benadiva, M.D.

I. ART PROCEDURES. A. In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

Approved January Waltham Forest CCG Fertility policy

Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility Glossary

Understanding eggs, sperm and embryos. Marta Jansa Perez Wolfson Fertility Centre

A mild strategy in IVF results in favourable outcomes in terms of term live birth, cost and patient discomfort

Is it the seed or the soil? Arthur Leader, MD, FRCSC

Transcription:

1 Table 1. Available studies on the relation between endometriosis and miscarriage (1995-2015). Study (citation) Country Study period Study design Sample size a Main finding b Main limitations Matoras et al., 1998 (10) Spain n.r. Prospective nested cohort study 62 RR=1.3 (0.5-3.4) Small sample size, unadjusted for age and mode of conception Omland et al., 2005 (11) Norway 1990-2002 Gergolet et al., 2010 (12) Benaglia et al., 2012 (13) Hjordt Hansen et al., 2014 (14) Italy- Slovenia Italy- Spain 2000-2008 2005-2009 Denmark 1977-2009 Mekaru et al., 2014 (15) Japan 1995-2011 Aris, 2014 (16) Canada 1997-2008 Retrospective cohort of IVF pregnancies Retrospective cohort of women operated for uterine septum Retrospective, nested cohort on IVF pregnancies Retrospective cohort with national registers Retrospective cohort of women who underwent laparoscopy Retrospective cohort with national registers 212 OR=2.0 (1.2-3.1) Adjusted but not matched for age. Include multiple pregnancies 20 OR=2.7 (0.7-10.1) Small sample size, selected population (operated uterine septum), unadjusted for age 78 OR=1.1 (0.5-1.4) Not designed for miscarriage, small sample size, unadjusted for age. 25,834 RR=1.2 (1.2-1.3) for natural / RR=4.3 (3.4-5.5) for ART Age matched at study entry but not at age of pregnancy. 49 OR=1.0 (0.4-2.6) Small sample size, unadjusted for age 784 OR=1.9 (1.2-2.9) Unadjusted for age and mode of conception, underestimation of the rate of miscarriage. a Refers to the number of women with endometriosis. b Data in parenthesis are 95%Cis

2 Table 2. Baseline characteristics of the two study groups. Characteristics Endometriosis Controls n=313 n=313 p Age (years) 35.5 ± 3.5 35.5 ± 3.5 0.95 BMI (Kg/m 2 ) 21.6 ± 3.1 22.2 ± 3.7 0.04 Previous deliveries 32 (10%) 47 (15%) 0.09 Previous miscarriages 0.43 None 270 (86%) 255 (82%) 1 34 (11%) 45 (14%) 2 9 (3%) 13 (4%) Duration of infertility (years) 3.5 ± 2.0 4.1 ± 2.5 0.004 Previous IVF cycles 0.14 None 117 (38%) 148 (47%) 1 112 (36%) 97 (31%) 2 84 (26%) 68 (22%) Day 3 serum FSH (IU/ml) 7.6 ± 3.0 7.6 ± 2.9 0.93 AMH (ng/ml) 1.7 (0.9-3.3) 1.9 (0.9-3.6) 0.31 Intramural fibroids 29 (9%) 31 (10%) 0.79 Indication to IVF <0.001 Endometriosis 205 (66%) 0 (0%) Endometriosis + male factor 108 (34%) 0 (0%) Male factor 0 (0%) 155 (49%) Tubal factor 0 (0%) 27 (9%) Unexplained 0 (0%) 118 (38%) Mixed (without endometriosis) 0 (0%) 13 (4%) Data is presented as Mean ± SD, Median (Interquartile Range-IQR) or Number (%).

3 Supplementary Table 1. Main endometriosis-related characteristics of the affected women (n=313). Characteristics Number (%) History of endometriosis Previous interventions for endometriosis None 80 (26%) 1 198 (63%) 2 35 (11%) Previous excision of ovarian endometriomas None 62 (27%) Unilateral 117 (50%) Bilateral 54 (23%) Previous removal of deep peritoneal nodules 98 (42%) Endometriosis at the time of IVF (sonographic findings) Ovarian endometriomas None 154 (49%) Unilateral 134 (43%) Bilateral 25 (8%) Deep peritoneal nodules 17 (5%) Adenomyosis 29 (9%)

4 Supplementary Table 2. Characteristics of the fresh cycles in the two study groups. Characteristics Endometriosis Controls n=235 n=235 p Regimen of ovarian hyper-stimulation 0.10 Long protocol 112 (48%) 94 (40%) Flare-up protocol 37 (16%) 31 (13%) GnRH antagonists 82 (35%) 109 (46%) Others 4 (2%) 1 (1%) Duration of stimulation (days) 10.1 ± 2.2 10.2 ± 2.4 0.52 Total dose of FSH administered (IU) 2,732 ± 1,330 2,464 ± 1,194 0.02 Estradiol at the time of hcg administration (pg/ml) 1,934 ± 925 1,886 ± 862 0.58 Total number of oocytes retrieved 7.1 ± 4.0 8.0 ± 4.2 0.03 In vitro fertilization technique used 0.46 IVF 42 (18%) 35 (15%) ICSI 193 (82%) 200 (85%) Stage at embryo transfer 0.56 48 hours 70 (30%) 61 (26%) 72 hours 133 (57%) 136 (58%) Blastocysts 32 (13%) 38 (16%) Number of embryos-blastocysts transferred 0.28 1 65 (28%) 71 (30%) 2 152 (65%) 154 (66%) 3 18 (7%) 10 (4%) Data is presented as Mean ± SD or Number (%).

5 Supplementary Table 3. Characteristics of the frozen cycles in the two study groups. Characteristics Endometriosis Controls n=78 n=78 p Protocol 0.98 Frozen eggs, HRT 17 (22%) 17 (22%) Frozen embryos, HRT 30 (38%) 29 (37%) Frozen Embryos, natural cycle 31 (40%) 32 (41%) In vitro fertilization technique used 0.02 IVF 16 (20%) 5 (6%) ICSI 62 (80%) 73 (94%) Stage at embryo transfer 0.86 48 hours 6 (8%) 6 (8%) 72 hours 23 (29%) 20 (25%) Blastocysts 49 (63%) 52 (67%) Number of embryos-blastocysts transferred 0.88 1 49 (63%) 52 (67%) 2 28 (36%) 25 (32%) 3 1 (1%) 1 (1%) HRT: Hormone replacement treatment

6 Table 3. Subgroup analyses on the risk of miscarriage Subgroup Endometriosis Controls Total N. abortion (%) Total N. abortion (%) p Crude OR (95%CI) Adj. OR (95%CI) Type of cycle Fresh cycles 235 32 (14%) 235 42 (18%) 0.25 0.72 (0.44-1.20) 0.80 (0.47-1.35) a Frozen cycles 78 16 (21%) 78 18 (23%) 0.85 0.86 (0.40-1.84) 0.84 (0.37-1.93) b Number of embryos transfered One 114 15 (13%) 123 20 (16%) 0.58 0.78 (0.38-1.61) 0.73 (0.34-1.58) c 2 199 33 (17%) 190 40 (21%) 0.30 0.75 (0.45-1.24) 0.85 (0.50-1.44) c Endometriomas at ultrasound (all cases) Yes 159 30 (19%) 159 33 (21%) 0.78 0.89 (0.51-1.54) 1.00 (0.56-1.81) d No 154 18 (12%) 154 27 (18%) 0.20 0.62 (0.33-1.19) 0.63 (0.32-1.23) d Endometriomas at ultrasound (fresh cycles) Yes 120 20 (17%) 120 27 (21%) 0.62 0.80 (0.42-1.54) 0.92 (0.46-1.84) a No 115 12 (10%) 115 15 (14%) 0.33 0.63 (0.29-1.37) 0.71 (0.31-2.61) a Previous surgery for endometriosis Yes 233 32 (14%) 233 41 (18%) 0.31 0.75 (0.45-1.23) 0.82 (0.49-1.40) d No 80 16 (20%) 80 19 (24%) 0.70 0.80 (0.38-1.70) 0.76 (0.34-1.68) d a Model adjusted for BMI, parity, duration of infertility, male factor, total dose of FSH administered and number of oocytes retrieved. b Model adjusted for BMI, parity, duration of infertility, male factor and IVF technique. c Model adjusted for BMI, parity, duration of infertility, male factor and age. d Model adjusted for BMI, parity, duration of infertility and male factor.