The role of JECFA for CCFA

Similar documents
CHAPTER 2: RISK ANALYSIS

Agenda Item 3(a) CX/FA 16/48/3 November 2015

Risk Analysis and Science in Codex

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE

MEDICAL SCIENCES - Vol.II -The Need For an International Approach The Role of FAO and WHO - Jorgen Schlundt and Kazuaki Miyagishima

codex alimentarius commission

Codex MRL Setting and Harmonization. Yukiko Yamada, Ph.D.

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Risk Assessment : A Philippine Experience on Pesticides for Food Safety. Amelia W. Tejada

The Codex Alimentarius

Codex and international cooperation with the OIE

Food additives. FAO guidelines on the structure and content of the document called "Chemical and Technical Assessment (CTA)" Rome, February 2003

International Regulation-Intense Sweeteners

The Codex Alimentarius Codes of Practices for livestock products and animal feeding

A Manual for the Agrochemical Industry

Codex General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA) CODEX STAN

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

CRD03. Introduction 1

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Importance of Food Safety for Consumer Protection and International Trade

Module II: Scientific guidelines for the preparation of veterinary drug residue monographs, working papers and related summary documents for Joint

2 ND ANNUAL PAN-AFRICAN MEETING OF NATIONAL CODEX CONTACT POINT OFFICERS SUMMARY REPORT

Development of risk-based standard on aflatoxin in peanuts

CODEX Committee on Food Additives (CCFA) and the Codex General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA)

Residues of veterinary drugs in food

CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION

SECTION III GUIDELINES FOR SUBSIDIARY BODIES. SECTION III: Guidelines for Subsidiary Bodies

Codex Alimentarius: Today and Tomorrow

Sixteenth Session FAO Headquaters, Red Room, Rome, Italy, January 2005

Agenda Item 5(c) CX/FA 18/50/9 February 2018 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX COMMITTEE ON FOOD ADDITIVES Fiftieth Session

IPCS INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY

Mary Frances Lowe U.S. Codex Office World Spices Congress Kochi, India February 16-19, 2014

Updating the Principles and Methods of Risk Assessment: MRLs for Pesticides and Veterinary Drugs

Secretariat, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Codex Alimentarius Commission, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy

Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Foods- WHO Principles and Methods

Risk management of mycotoxin presence in food products:major unsolved points

ASEAN PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MAXIMUM LEVEL FOR CONTAMINANTS AND TOXINS IN FOOD AND FEED

1 PRINCIPLES AND METHODS FOR THE RISK ASSESSMENT OF 2

Module 34: Legal aspects, ADI and GRAS status of food additives

OTHER MATTERS ARISING FROM FAO AND WHO

Life cycle of. a Codex MRLs

CODEX WORK RELATED TO FOOD SAFETY OF COFFEE

Regarding Establishment of a Uniform Limit in a Positive List System concerning Agricultural Chemicals Residues in Food etc.

Agenda Item 6 CX/CF 14/8/6 February 2014

Agenda Item 6(a) CX/FA 09/41/7

PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF DATA DOSSIERS TO JMPR BY MANUFACTURERS. Dr Caroline A Harris and Cecilia Gaston Exponent International Ltd, UK

50 YEARS CODEX ALIMENTARIUS SAFE, GOOD FOOD FOR EVERYONE

DIETARY EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICALS IN FOOD

Joint FAO/WHO evaluation of the work of the Codex Alimentarius Commission

Secretariat, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Codex Alimentarius Commission, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy

October Joint FAO/WHO Development of a Scientific Collaboration to Create a Framework for Risk Assessment of Nutrients and Related Substances

Global Regulation of Food Additives

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR A TIERED APPROACH TO RISK RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION

TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA. List of guidance, guidelines and working documents developed or in use by EFSA 1

Developing Common ASEAN Food Consumption Data for Dietary Exposure Assessments. Keng Ngee Teoh Senior Manager, Scientific Programs

BACKGROUND. CL 2017/44-CPL April 2017

Agenda Item 7 CX/FAC 06/38/12, Add.1 March

Secretariat, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Codex Alimentarius Commission Viale delle Terme di Caracalla Rome, Italy

Maia Jack, Ph.D. CPGglobal, LLC 2013 Food Additives USDA FAS EMP: A Global Perspective on Safety Evaluation and Use

Guidance for Industry

Submission and evaluation of pesticide residues data for the estimation of maximum residue levels in food and feed

Codex comités - ministerie VWS - Inge Stoelhorst (VGP) Rosa Peran (IZ)

FORM ON WHICH INFORMATION ON THE COMPOUND TO BE EVALUATED BY JECFA IS PROVIDED

Provisional Translation Original: Japanese

CODEX GENERAL STANDARD FOR CONTAMINANTS AND TOXINS IN FOODS CODEX STAN

Recent Developments and Future Plans in the EFSA Assessments of Pesticides. Hermine Reich Pesticides Unit

Cooperation between the OIE and Codex: Codex perspective

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

Premarket Review. FFDCA Section 201(s) FFDCA Section 201(s) (cont.)

From risk assessment to risk management focus on contaminants. Frans Verstraete European Commission DG Health and Consumer Protection

Maintaining Food Safety and Quality to ensure Consumer Safety

JMPR Review and MRL Recommendations Prof. Dr. Árpád Ambrus

Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Lusaka, Zambia, 3-5 July 2002

Tocopherols (E ) used in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age

FAO/WHO Training Manual. Training Programme for Developing Food Standards within a Risk Analysis Framework

Overview of the procedures currently used at EFSA for the assessment of dietary exposure to different chemical substances 1

Cumulative Risk Assessment

CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19.

IPCS INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY

CURRICULUM VITAE. Ezzeddine Boutrif

Meeting Report: Seminar on Uses and Safety of Sweeteners, May 30, 2013, Jakarta, Indonesia

Overview of USP General Chapters <476> and <1086> Prescription/Non-Prescription Stakeholder Forum October 19, 2017

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Welcome and introduction to EFSA

Agenda Item 7e CX/FAC 01/9 February 2001 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME

DR. P. VINCENT HEGARTY

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19.

Risk assessment of mycotoxins: the EFSA approach. Katleen Baert Scientific officer, EFSA

IUPAC Representative Report Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues 34th Session May 13-18, 2002 Den Haag, Netherlands

The SPS and TBT Agreements and International Standards (Agenda Item 5): Implication of SPS Agreement and relation to Codex standard

The Second Draft of Provisional Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for Agricultural Chemicals in Foods

Total number of items Number items of relevance

ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS:

VICH GL23: Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: genotoxicity testing

Federation of EU Specialty Food Ingredients Industries

Practical guidance for applicants on the submission of applications on food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings

Health Canada s Safety Assessment Process for Sugar Substitutes

- draft scientific opinion -

Guidance document for WHO monographers and reviewers evaluating flavouring agents

Transcription:

The role of JECFA for CCFA How does JECFA perform safety assessments: scope, data needs, process and outcome Angelika Tritscher, WHO Secretary JECFA Markus Lipp, FAO Secretary JECFA

Overview Introduction Toxicological assessment Development of specifications Exposure assessment Output from JECFA consultation How it works in practice Q&A

Introduction Standards need to be based on science and be implemented and useful to governments and food chain operators

Risk Analysis Paradigm Regulation and control Scientific advice and information analysis Risk Assessment FAO & WHO Risk Management CAC & Member States Risk Communication Dialog with all stakeholders

Food Safety Health/Nutrition Claim/Labelling Fortification Food for Special Dietary Uses Safety Assessment of Novel Technologies

JECFA Areas of Work Risk assessment/safety evaluation of: Food Additives Processing aids (considered as food additives) Flavouring agents (by groups of related compounds) Contaminants Natural toxins Residues of Veterinary Drugs in animal products Specifications and analytical methods Residue definition, MRL proposals (veterinary drugs) Development and improvement of general principles

JECFA Output Summary Report: Electronic summary containing only basic conclusions Report: Concise summary of relevant information for evaluation and conclusion, including intake estimates Monographs: Detailed description and evaluation of all available data used in evaluation (1) Toxicological Monographs (2) Specifications etc.

JECFA database http://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database/search.aspx

FAO database http://www.fao.org/food/food-safety-quality/scientific-advice/jecfa/en/

Standard Process Identification and prioritisation of issues Call for data Selection of experts Meetings coordinated by FAO/WHO Secretariat Final reports adopted at end of each session Distribution and subsequent use of the expert advice ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/ a1296e/a1296e00.pdf

Principles and Methods http://www.who.int/foodsafety/chem/principles/en/index1.html EHC 240: Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food, WHO 2009 Updated principles and methods Compiled all guidance developed by JECFA and JMPR since EHC 70 (1987) and EHC 104 (1990) Harmonize methods to the extent possible

Risk Assessment: A Scientific Process Problem Formulation RM Hazard Identification Hazard Characterization Exposure Assessment RA Risk Characterization

Hazard Assessment Toxicology & epidemiology Assessment Procedure Identification of critical endpoint/effect and critical study/data set most sensitive species, most sensitive endpoint of relevance to humans, most relevant epidemiological study Identification of the Point of Departure (POD) No/Low Observed Adverse Effect Level (N/LOAEL), Benchmark Dose (BMD, BMDL) Identification of uncertainties, assignment of uncertainty/safety factors Outcome: ADI, 'no safety concern',

Toxicological assessment - Data needs Biochemical data: e.g. metabolism Toxicological data: in vitro and in vivo data to identify potential adverse health effect, dose-response relationships, mode of action Studies need to be undertaken with specific food additive intended for commerce, i.e. material tested needs to be clearly defined Comprehensive data set needs to allow characterization of toxicological profile to evaluate potential human health impact (simple in vitro test on cell toxicity is insufficient)

Toxicological assessment (cont d) Generally required are: metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies short-term toxicity, long-term toxicity/carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, and developmental toxicity studies in animals and genotoxicity studies epidemiological studies special studies designed to investigate specific effects, e.g. mechanism of toxicity, immune responses, or macromolecular binding

Tox Example: Cassia gum Table of content from WHO food additives series 62 Explanation Chemical and technical considerations Biological data Biochemical aspects Toxicological studies Acute toxicity Short-term studies of toxicity Long-term studies of toxicity and carcinogenicity Genotoxicity Reproductive toxicity Observations in humans Dietary exposure Use in foods Dietary exposure estimates Comments Toxicological data Assessment of dietary exposure Evaluation References

Specifications Technological data: Specify in detail the exact nature of the compound Chemical structure(s), CAS identifiers, etc Production method incl. use of solvents, catalysts, etc Define appropriate analytical methods,: to clearly define the material in commerce and compare with the material tested toxicologically To measure any relevant impurities

Specifications cont d In particular the following information is need: A discussion of chemical composition, including natural variability of parameters and all potential impurities (natural occurring or through manufacturing process) A discussion in how this new product has chemical parameters that would allow its identification and be suitable to distinguish this new product from other similar products that are already in the market A discussion about the novelty or benefits from a technological point of view (what new and unique features make it necessary to introduce this on the market)

Relationship between the ADI and specifications: 69 th JECFA report Specifications are a necessary product of Committee evaluations: to identify the substance that has been biologically tested to ensure that the substance is of the quality required for safe use in food to reflect and encourage good manufacturing practice Changes in specifications (impurities; composition) may raise questions on the material tested toxicologically

Exposure Assessment Exposure = level in foods x amounts of foods consumed Information in which foods or food groups the additive is used and at which use levels Average and high consumption pattern

Exposure assessment cont d Technical levels of use of the additive in the foods in which it may be used; Annual poundage of the additive introduced into the food supply; Estimation of additive intakes based on food consumption data for foods in which the additive may be used; Food consumption patterns; also considering different (age-) population groups

How it works in practice Requests for scientific advice: CCFA prioritization working group Technological necessity of additive on priority list needs to be demonstrated Responsibility of requestors JECFA workplan and calls for data Timelines Data need to be available Sponsors need to respond to call for data (we need sponsor s help)

General procedure ADI/TDI Level of health concern Sources of exposure Toxicology & Epidemiology (WHO) JECFA Chemistry, Analytics (FAO) Codex Alimentarius Maximum use levels Maximum limits MRLs Prioritization FAO/WHO Secretariat to schedule meetings and set agenda

JECFA: general process flow Codex Alimentarius (CCPR, CCCF, CCRVDF) Statutes & Guidelines Issues & Priorities Call for Data JECFA Meeting Publications 1 2 4 5 WHO, FAO Member states 3 Assignment of Experts

JECFA: general time lines draft evaluation to secretariat & to all experts Call for Data TA assignments Deadline Data submission JECFA Meeting Results & Publications Provide data to Secretariat Sponsors 3-5 months 6-8 months 1 month timeline 1 YEAR

JECFA-CCFA: process flow and time lines Example 82 nd JECFA Meeting June 2016 Requests for evaluation: 46&47 th CCFA 2014&15 Final agenda and call for data published August 2015 Deadline for data submission December 2015 Draft monograph to experts Mai 2016 Meeting June 7-16, 2016 Summary report end June, 2016 Report Monograph 6-8 months post meeting 8-9 months post meeting

What does it mean for you? If you request assessment: make sure there is a commitment by data owner to submit relevant and sufficient data to JECFA Agreed priority list: Make sure the information is provided to relevant parties in your country (CCP but also data holders) JECFA call for data: distribute to relevant parties JECFA Secretariat is the primary point of contact (not Codex Secretariat)

Thank you!! Questions?? Angelika Tritscher: tritschera@who.int Markus Lipp: markus.lipp@fao.org