SESSION III: Chronic myeloid leukemia PONATINIB. Gianantonio Rosti, MD, Department of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy

Similar documents
Imatinib & Ponatinib. Two ends of the spectrum in 2016s reality

CML: Living with a Chronic Disease

IRIS 8-Year Update. Management of TKI Resistance Will KD mutations matter? Sustained CCyR on study. 37% Unacceptable Outcome 17% 53% 15%

Management of CML in blast crisis. Lymphoma Tumor Board November 27, 2015

Role of Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Newly Diagnosed CML. GIUSEPPE SAGLIO, MD University of Torino, Italy

What is the optimal management strategy for younger CP-CML patients with matched, related donors who fail to achieve CCyR

Guidelines and real World: Management of CML in chronic and advanced phases. Carolina Pavlovsky. FUNDALEU May 2017 Frankfurt

Dose reduction. What do we know and how we do it in clinical practice. Andreas Hochhaus

2nd generation TKIs to first line therapy

IS MUTATION ANALYSIS OF BCR-ABL OF ANY VALUE IN CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF CML PATIENTS? David Marin, Imperial College London

AGGIORNAMENTI IN EMATOLOGIA Faenza, 7 Giugno 2018 LMC: ALGORITMI TERAPEUTICI ATTUALI E IL PROBLEMA DELLA RESISTENZA.

The BCR-ABL1 fusion. Epidemiology. At the center of advances in hematology and molecular medicine

ELN Recommendations on treatment choice and response. Gianantonio Rosti, MD, Department of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy

Contemporary and Future Approaches in CML. Emory Meeting; Sea Island August 2014 Hagop Kantarjian, M.D.

2 nd Generation TKI Frontline Therapy in CML

NEW DRUGS IN HEMATOLOGY Bologna, 9-11 May 2016 CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA STATUS OF THE ART OF TREATMENT.

HOW I TREAT CML. 4. KONGRES HEMATOLOGOV IN TRANSFUZIOLOGOV SLOVENIJE Z MEDNARODNO UDELEŽBO Terme Olimia, Podčetrtek,

CML: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Jorge Cortes, MD Chief CML Section Department of Leukemia The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

CML David L Porter, MD University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Abramson Cancer Center CML Current treatment options for CML

EUROPEAN LEUKEMIANET RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA

NEW DRUGS IN HEMATOLOGY

Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness in Later-line Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): Ponatinib in the Third-Line Treatment of CML in Canada

New drugs in first-line therapy

The concept of TFR (Treatment Free Remission) in CML

Contemporary and Future Approaches in Management of CML. Disclosures

Juan Luis Steegmann Hospital de la Princesa. Madrid. JL Steegmann

Low doses of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CML

BMS Satellite Symposium

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia A Disease of Young at Heart but Not of Body

CML UPDATE 2018 DAVID S. SNYDER, M.D. MARCH

How I treat high risck CML

New drugs and trials. Andreas Hochhaus

What is New in CML in Hagop Kantarjian, M.D. February 2011

DAVID S. SNYDER, M.D.

A 34-year old women came because of abdominal discomfort. Vital sign was stable. Spleen tip was palpable.

What Can We Expect from Imatinib? CML Case Presentation. Presenter Disclosure Information. CML Case Presentation (cont)? Session 2: 8:15 AM - 9:00 AM

10 YEARS EXPERIENCE OF TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR THERAPY FOR CML IN OXFORD

CML Treatment Failure: More Threatening Than It Appears. Mutation Testing

Oxford Style Debate on STOPPING Treatment.

CML: definition. CML epidemiology. CML diagnosis. CML: peripheralbloodsmear. Cytogenetic abnormality of CML

Outlook CML 2016: What is being done on the way to cure

Molecular Detection of BCR/ABL1 for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of CML

State of the Art Therapy and Monitoring of CML Hagop Kantarjian, M.D. Grand Rounds UT Southwestern. October 28, 2010

Molecular monitoring of CML patients

State of the Art Therapy and Monitoring of CML Hagop Kantarjian, M.D. Grand Rounds Hackensack, New Jersey. September 22, 2010

Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

What is New in CML Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML and AML Sections Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas

CML and Future Perspective. Hani Al-Hashmi, MD

Future of CML: ABL001 and other treatments in the pipeline. Gianantonio Rosti, MD, Department of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy

ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Stopping Treatment in CML and dose reduction in clinical practice: Can we do it safely? YES WE CAN!

Allogeneic SCT for. 1st TKI. Vienna Austria. Dr. Eduardo Olavarría Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra

Summary 1. Comparative effectiveness of ponatinib

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) Warunsuda Sripakdee, BCOP,BCP Prince of Songkla University

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) act by preventing disease

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Introduction. Methods Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Stopping TKI s in CML- Are we There Yet? Joseph O. Moore, MD Duke Cancer Institute

CML Clinical Case Scenario

Current Monitoring for CML: Goals and. Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML & AML Section Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center

Blast Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

screening procedures Disease resistant to full-dose imatinib ( 600 mg/day) or intolerant to any dose of imatinib

Hull and East Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire NHS Trusts Haematology Multidisciplinary Team Guideline and Pathway. Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

CML Update 2016 Arthur 2016

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Ponatinib (Iclusig) for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia / Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The current standard of care in CML. Gianantonio Rosti, MD University of Bologna Bologna, Italy

Ponatinib Withdrawal Update

Imatinib dose intensification, combination therapies. Andreas Hochhaus Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany

Ponatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) 2

Form 2012 R3.0: Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) Pre-Infusion Data

Ponatinib for treating chronic myeloid leukaemia and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia



Welcome and Introductions

ULTRA-DEEP SEQUENCING OF THE BCR-ABL KINASE DOMAIN FOR BETTER THERAPEUTIC TAILORING OF PHILADELPHIA CHROMOSOME-POSITIVE LEUKEMIA PATIENTS

PATIENTS IN FOCUS: WHAT S RELEVANT FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKAEMIA AND PHILADELPHIA CHROMOSOME-POSITIVE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKAEMIA?

Does Generic Imatinib Change the Treatment Approach in CML?

La terapia della LMC: è possibile guarire senza trapianto? Fabrizio Pane

J Clin Oncol by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

THE IMPORTANCE OF MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS IN CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKAEMIA FOR TREATMENT CHOICE

HSCT for Myeloproliferative Disorders. Jane Apperley

Starting & stopping therapy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What more is needed? Richard A. Larson, MD University of Chicago March 2019

CML 301 SOME INTRODUCTION INTO CML, CML SCIENCE, DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INFORMATION RESOURCES. by Sarunas Narbutas Jan Geissler.

C Longer follow up on IRIS data

The speaker has no financial relationships with a commercial interest to disclose and no conflicts of interest to resolve.

Stopping treatment how much we understand about mechanisms to stop successfully today, and where are the limits? Andreas Hochhaus

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Bosutinib (Bosulif) for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia April 21, 2015

I nuovi guariti? La malattia minima residua nella leucemia mieloide cronica. Fabrizio Pane

CML TREATMENT GUIDELINES

The Future of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: New Treatments on the Horizon

Practical Guidance for the Management of CML in 2016

Supplementary Online Content

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia - ASH

New Anti Leukemic treatments deserve a Cardioncology approach. Guido Gini AOU «Ospedali Riuniti» Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona

BCR-ABL1 Compound Mutations Combining Key Kinase Domain Positions Confer Clinical Resistance to Ponatinib in Ph Chromosome-Positive Leukemia

FEP Medical Policy Manual

517 Spirit 2: An NCRI Randomised Study Comparing Dasatinib with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed CML

Milestones and Monitoring

History of CML Treatment

Treatment free remission in CML: from the concept to practice. François-Xavier Mahon. Cancer Center Bordeaux Université Bordeaux, France

Dati sulla sospensione della terapia

Transcription:

SESSION III: Chronic myeloid leukemia PONATINIB Gianantonio Rosti, MD, Department of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy

Ponatinib A Pan-BCR-ABL Inhibitor Rationally designed inhibitor of BCR- ABL Active against T315I mutant Unique approach to accommodating gatekeeper residue Potent activity against an array of BCR- ABL variants Once-daily oral activity Half-life 22 hours Also targets other therapeutically relevant kinases: Inhibits FLT3, FGFR, VEGFR and PDGFR, and c-kit O Hare T, et al. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:401-412

KINASE INHIBITION PROFILE OF AP24534 FOR NATIVE ABL, ABL T315I AND SELECTED KINASES KINASE IC 50 (nm) ABL 0.37 ABL T315I 2.00 ABL, OTHER MUTANTS 0.30-0.44 LYN 0.24 csrc 5.40 ckit 12.50 VEGFR2 1.50 PDGFRa 1.10 FGFR1 2.20 O Hare et al, Cancer Cell 2009;16:401-412

Safety* (all diagnoses) Dose Cohort Phase 1 Study of Ponatinib Dose Selection for Phase 2 N Patients treated N Patients w/dlt N Patients w/ Pancreatitis % Patients w/ Pancreatitis 2 mg 30 mg 31 0 3 10% 45 mg 31 2 4 13% 60 mg 19 6 4 21% Efficacy (CML CP patients only) Dose Cohort N Evaluable N MCyR % MCyR 30 mg 5 2 40% 45 mg 12 10 83% 60 mg 11 6 55% 45 mg once daily is the recommended phase 2 dose *Data for N=81 all treated patients. Cortes et al, ASH 2010 and NEJM 2012;367:2075-2088

Ponatinib PACE Study Patient Population CP-CML n = 270* Median [range] age, years 60 [18 94] Median [range] time since diagnosis, years 7 [0.5 27] Resistant to dasatinib or nilotinib, n/n (%) 214/256 (84) No mutation 138 (51) Any mutation 132 (49) T315I mutation 64 (24) Median [range] follow-up, months 15.3 [0.1 25] *Includes 3 CP-CML patients who were non-cohort assigned (post-imatinib, non-t315i), but treated. Denominator includes only patients who received prior dasatinib or nilotinib. Cortes JE et al. Blood. 2012;120: Abstract 163.

Ponatinib PACE Study Prior TKI Treatments Prior TKI exposure, n (%) R/I n = 203 CP-CML T315I n = 64 Overall* N = 449 Imatinib only 0 (0) 10 (16) 21 (5) Imatinib + (dasatinib OR nilotinib) 74 (36) 31 (48) 172 (38) Imatinib + dasatinib + nilotinib 122 (60) 21 (33) 237 (53) 2 prior TKIs 199 (98) 53 (83) 417 (93) 3 prior TKIs 135 (67) 26 (41) 262 (58) *Includes 5 patients (3 CP-CML, 2 AP-CML) who were non-cohort assigned (post-imatinib, non-t315i), but treated. Patients could have received other TKIs or anti-cancer therapy. Includes approved and investigational agents. Cortes JE et al. Blood. 2012;120: Abstract 163.

Ponatinib Phase II Study Responses to Therapy Ponatinib 45 mg daily 93% 2 prior TKI, 58% 3 prior TKI Median follow-up 38.4 months (0.1-48.6 months) Percentage CP-CML AP-CML BP-CML Ph+ ALL MCyR CCyR MMR MR 4.5 MaHR MaHR MaHR R/I 55 48 33 19 62 32 50 T315I 72 70 58 34 61 29 36 Total ** 59 53 39 22 61 31 41 Median mo to response 2.8 2.8 5.5 NR 0.7 1.0 0.7 Cortes J, et al. Blood. 2014;124: Abstract 3135. Kantarjian HM, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;21(5s): Abstract 7081.

Probability of Remaining Response, % Efficacy of Ponatinib in CP-CML Duration of Response 100 90 80 70 60 50 83% of patients estimated to remain in MCyR at 36 months 40 30 20 10 0 Total Resistant/intolerant T315I N 148 103 45 Lost MCyR (n) 20 16 4 0 12 24 36 48 60 Months After First MCyR 83% estimated to maintain MCyR at 36 months Cortes JE, et al. Blood. 2014;124: Abstract 3135.

Ponatinib prescribing information EU CML and Ph+ ALL - Second line after dasatinib or nilotinib failure (when imatinib is not considered an appropriate treatment) - T315I mutation

European LeukemiaNet 2013 Treatment Recommendations First-line Imatinib 400 x 1, nilotinib 300 x 2, or dasatinib 100 x 1 Second-line Intolerance Failure Third-line Switch to another TKI, taking into account comorbidities and side effects Switch from imatinib to another TKI, taking into account mutations, comorbidities, and side effects Switch from nilotinib to dasatinib, bosutinib, or ponatinib Switch from dasatinib to nilotinib, bosutinib, or ponatinib Allogeneic stem cell transplant Switch to another TKI (ponatinib) Allogeneic stem cell transplant Experimental treatment Blood 2013

Patients (%) Response to Ponatinib in CP-CML by Number of Prior TKIs: Response at Any Time (n=270) > Rates of cytogenetic and molecular response to ponatinib were higher with fewer prior TKIs 100 80 60 40 20 79 79 71 58 49 65 45 33 58 42 37 1 TKI (n=19) 2 TKIs (n=97) 3 TKIs (n=142) 4 TKIs (n=12) 37 32 27 26 24 24 8 8 8 0 MCyR CCyR MMR MR4 MR4.5 MCyR, 0% 35% Ph+ metaphases; CCyR, 0% Ph+ metaphases; MMR, 0.1% BCR-ABL IS ; MR4, 0.01% BCR-ABL IS or undetectable disease in cdna with 10,000 ABL transcripts; MR4.5, 0.0032% BCR-ABL IS or undetectable disease in cdna with 32,000 ABL transcripts Hochhaus et al ASH 2015

PACE: Response by Baseline Mutation Status Mutation Status at Entry MCyR n/n (%) CCyR n/n (%) CP R/I Cohort Any mutations 30/66 (46) 24/66 (36) No mutation 49/125 (39) 40/125 (32) CP T315I Cohort T315I only 19/29 (66) 15/29 (52) T315I + additional mutation(s) 9/14 (64) 9/14 (64) Cortes JE et al. Blood. 2012;120: Abstract 163.

Sequential TKI Non head-to-head comparison of trials reporting results for CP-CML patients Study Third-line treatment Garg, et al Rossi, 2009 1 et al 2 Dasatinib or nilotinib Dasatinib or nilotinib Ibrahim, et al 3 Dasatinib or nilotinib Giles, et al 4 Nilotinib Khoury, et al 5 Bosutinib N 25 (CP) 66 (91% CP) 26 (CP) 37 (CP) 118 (CP) CCyR, % 24 15 35 24 24 OS Median NR, Median FFS 20 mos Median 110 mos 30 mos, 47% Median NR 18 mos, 86% Median NR 24 mos, 83% FFS=failure-free survival; NR=not reported. 1. Garg RJ, et al. Blood. 2009;114:4361-4368. 2. Rossi AR, et al. Poster. ASH. 2010 (abstr 2294). 3. Ibrahim AR, et al. Blood. 2010;116:5497-5500. 4. Giles FJ, et al. Leukemia. 2010;24:1299-1301. 5. Khoury HJ, et al. Blood. 2012;119:3403-3412.

BCR-ABL KD sequence Disease burden Sequential therapy with TKIs: the Ph+ clone knows how to find a way out IMATINIB INHIBITOR 2 INHIBITOR 3?? time RELAPSE 1 RELAPSE 2 RELAPSE 3 WT IM-res mutation Accumulation of compound drug-resistant mutations Modified from Shah et al, JCI 2007 Sep;117(9):2562-9.

Gozgit, et al. Blood. 2013;122 (abstr 3992). Effective concentration of ponatinib

In Vitro Heat Map Based on Optimized Effective C ave /IC 50 Cutoffs In vitro IC 50 values for imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib against 21 BCR- ABL mutants determined as described previously 1 Effective C ave /IC 50 values for each TKI/mutant were used to predict CCyR rates based on cutoffs generated in the nilotinib and dasatinib training set Predicted Response Rate 0% CCyR >0 to <25% CCyR 25% CCyR Indicates correct prediction X Denotes incorrect prediction; symbol color indicates the correct category In Vitro IC 50 Values (nm) with CCyR Rate Prediction Overlaid BCR-ABL Imatinib Nilotinib Dasatinib Bosutinib Ponatinib Native 201 15 2 71 3 M244V 287 12 2 147 3 L248R 10000 549 6 874 8 L248V 586 26 5 182 4 G250E 1087 41 4 85 5 Y253H 4908 179 X 3 40 5 E255K 2487 127 9 X 181 6 E255V 8322 784 11 X 214 16 V299L 295 24 16 1228 4 T315A 476 50 59 122 4 T315I 9773 8091 10000 4338 6 F317C 324 16 45 165 3 F317I 266 25 40 232 7 F317L 675 21 10 82 4 F317V 1023 26 104 1280 10 M351T 404 15 2 97 4 E355A 441 18 3 74 7 F359C 728 47 2 70 6 F359I 324 64 3 76 11 F359V 346 41 X 2 59 4 H396R 395 23 X 2 60 4 E459K 612 38 4 127 5 1. Gozgit MJ, et al. [Abstract 3992). Presented at the 55th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 7-10, 2013; New Orleans, LA, USA. X Rivera et al, ASH 2015

Incidence of Arterial and Venous Thrombotic Events Total (N = 449) CP-CML (n = 270) AE SAE AE SAE Cumulative exposure, patient-years 778.9 577.4 ATEs, n (%) 99 (22) 78 (17) 74 (27) 60 (22) Cardiovascular 52 (12) 37 (8) 36 (13) 28 (10) Cerebrovascular 37 (8) 28 (6) 31 (11) 23 (9) Peripheral vascular 37 (8) 27 (6) 28 (10) 20 (7) Exposure-adjusted ATEs, number of patients w/events per 100 pt-yrs 12.7 10.0 12.8 10.4 VTEs, n (%) 24 (5) 20 (4) 12 (4) 10 (4) Exposure-adjusted VTEs, number of patients with events per 100 pt-yrs 3.1 2.6 2.1 1.7 Cortes JE, et al. Blood. 2014;124: Abstract 3135.

Commonly Reported non-hematological adverse effects of TKIs in prospective Clinical Trials J.J. Moslehi and Michael Deininger, JCO:33 (35), 2015

Flexibility of ponatinib

Risk Factors for Arteriovascular Events With Ponatinib 671 ponatinib-treated patients from phase I, II and III Median treatment duration: 224 days Median dose intensity: 37.2 mg/d Covariate Odds Ratio P Value Dose intensity 1.71 <.001 Hx of diabetes 1.60.11 Hx of ischemic disease 2.64 <.001 Age 1.63 <.001 Log baseline platelets 1.36.26 Log baseline neutrophils 1.04.83 Number of prior TKI 1.20.10 Time since diagnosis 1.58.05 Each 15-mg decrease in ponatinib dose intensity predicted to result in 33% reduction in risk of arterial thrombotic events Knickerbocker R, et al. Blood. 2014;124: Abstract 4546.

PACE Trial: ATEs and VTEs Kantarjian, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5s (suppl; abstr 7081). ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Data on File. 06 Jan 2014.

Impact of Prospective Dose Reductions The majority of patients who underwent dose reductions maintained their response 1 year post-reduction 95% of patients in MCyR 94% of patients in MMR Cortes JE, et al. Blood. 2014;124: Abstract 3135.

PACE Trial Hochhaus, et al. J Clin Oncol. 32:5s,2014 (suppl; abstr 7084).

Impact of Prospective Dose Reductions The majority of patients who underwent dose reductions maintained their response 1 year post-reduction 95% of patients in MCyR 94% of patients in MMR Similar maintenance of response was seen in patients who did not have dose reductions Cortes JE, et al. Blood. 2014;124: Abstract 3135.

OPTIC-2L (AP24534-15-303) 600 CP-CML Resistant to Imatinib R Randomization within 42 days of Screening Bone Marrow Aspirate Dose Level until MMR Ponatinib 30mg qd N=150 Ponatinib 15mg qd N=300 Nilotinib 400mg bid N=150 Dose Reductions for AEs allowable in each arm Dose Reduction after MMR at 3,6,9 or 12 months 15mg qd 10mg qd No Change Bone Marrow Aspirate required after 12 months DC from study if no MCyR by 12m OR Continue treatment for up to 5yrs or until loss of response 5/11/2016 AP24534-15-303 Study design Characteristics & EU Feasibility 25

OPUS Trial Optimizing Ponatinib USe A GIMEMA phase 2 study of the efficacy and risk profile of ponatinib, 30 mg once daily, in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Chronic Phase (CP) patients resistant to imatinib. Optimization of the dose at MMR The initial dose of ponatinib is 30 mg once daily The MR is evaluated every 4 weeks. At confirmed MMR > dose reduced to 15 mg daily Than, QPCR every 12 weeks BCR-ABL > 1% > dose back to 30 mg once daily GR/Roma 2.3.15

Ponatinib or SCT for T315I CML Pts 18 yrs with CML T315I in any stage enrolled in PACE (n=449) or EBMT (1999-2010; n=222) Median age (yr): CP 53 vs 48; AP 55 vs 46; BP 47 vs 44; Ph+ ALL 55 vs 36 Disease group Median survival (mo) PACE EBMT CP AP CP NR 103 AP NR 56 BP 7 11 BP Ph+ ALL 7 32 Nicolini FE, et al. Blood. 2015;126: Abstract 480.

SESSION III: Chronic myeloid leukemia PONATINIB Gianantonio Rosti, MD, Department of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy