MRL application form (SANCO 4044/2008 rev. 10.2)

Similar documents
Chlormequat SANCO/175/08 final 7 May 2009

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 1. Review report for the active substance Copper compounds

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

APPROVED: 05 February 2016 PUBLISHED: 15 February 2016

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FINAL

Review of the existing maximum residue levels for denathonium benzoate according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 1. Final

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FINAL

PEER REVIEW REPORT ON PENOXSULAM

Art. 51 Extension of authorisation for minor uses. Risk Management

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for pyraclostrobin in cucumbers and Jerusalem artichokes 1

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRL for 8- hydroxyquinoline in tomatoes 1

TBZ + TDL EC 300 ( ) (ABILIS)) Page 1 of 26. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of confirmatory data submitted for the active substance dichlorprop-p 1

VVH BELOUKHA Page 1 of 29. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

REASONED OPINION. Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for propamocarb in radishes and kale 1. European Food Safety Authority 2

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance sodium hypochlorite 1

Template to be used for the List of Endpoints

PULSAR PLUS (BAS H) Page 1 of 28. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

Modification of the existing maximum residue level for fosetyl in blackberry, celeriac and Florence fennel

Modification of the existing MRLs for metalaxyl-m in lettuce and other salad plants 1

REGISTRATION REPORT Part A Risk Management. Product code: ALB 083 Product name(s): ARVENS DUO. Southern Zone Zonal Rapporteur Member State: France

Reasoned opinion on the modification of MRLs for spirodiclofen in strawberries bananas, avocado, mango and papaya 1

NAUTILE (FAZ02) Page 1 of 26. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for mepanipyrim in tomato, aubergine, strawberry and cucumber 1

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance L-ascorbic acid 1

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for acetamiprid in purslane, legume vegetables and pulses (beans and peas) 1

Modification of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for dimethomorph in various crops

CENTURION 240 EC Page 1 of 30. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management. Product name: CENTURION 240 EC Active Substance: Clethodim, 240 g/l

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the MRLs for fenhexamid in various berries 1

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRL for ametoctradin in hops 1

FAZ10 (CYMTER WG) Page 1 of 26. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance plant oils/clove oil 1

Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for iodosulfuron according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1

Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for oxamyl according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for bupirimate in several crops 1

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for propyzamide in leaves, flowers and roots of herbal infusions 1

APPROVED: 4 December 2015 PUBLISHED: 9 December 2015

COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ASSESSMENT REPORT ON PICOLINAFEN DISCUSSED UNDER THE CO-RAPPORTEUR SYSTEM

Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for cyromazine according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance kieselgur (diatomaceous earth) 1

(KINVARA) Page 1 of 33. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

CONCLUSION ON PESTICIDE PEER REVIEW

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRL for trifloxystrobin in cane fruit 1

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ammonium acetate 1

(KEYNOTE [formerly ASCRA XPRO or BIX+FLU+PTZ EC 260]) Page 1 of 34. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for quizalofop-p in oilseed rape, sunflower, cotton and soybean 1

Setting of import tolerances for cyantraniliprole in rice and coffee beans

REASONED OPINION OF EFSA. Inclusion of potassium tri-iodide in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/ Prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR)

MONOLITH Page 1 of 29. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management. Product code: MSM+PCS+MPR WG (4.5+6.

Modification of the existing maximum residue level for thiacloprid in honey

BILOXA (ALSNC10HCLQ01) Page 1 of 31. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

REASONED OPINION. Modification of the existing maximum residue level for captan in hops. Abstract

CONCLUSION ON PESTICIDES PEER REVIEW

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for dimethoate in olives for oil production and table olives 1

Modification of the existing MRLs for fluopicolide in radishes, onions, kale and potatoes 1

CONCLUSION ON PESTICIDES PEER REVIEW

BAS H (REBELL T) Page 1 of 30. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

APPROVED: 30 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 15 April 2015

Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for dodine according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1

The regulatory landscape. The now and the not yet

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, ABSTRACT. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy KEY WORDS

Combined review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for the active substances metalaxyl and metalaxyl-m

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for captan in pome fruits and commodities of animal origin 1

Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for penthiopyrad in stone fruits and cereals. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

APPROVED: 17 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 27 March 2015

Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for benalaxyl according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1

Recent Developments and Future Plans in the EFSA Assessments of Pesticides. Hermine Reich Pesticides Unit

Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for spiroxamine according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Cydia pomonella granulovirus (CpGV) 1

GUIDANCE ON SUBMISSIONS FOR SAFETY EVALUATION OF SOURCES OF NUTRIENTS OR OF OTHER INGREDIENTS PROPOSED FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOODS

Prioritised review of the existing maximum residue levels for dimethoate and omethoate according to Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for trifloxystrobin in horseradish, parsley root and purslane 1

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for fluopicolide in various vegetable crops 1

FENVALERATE (119) EXPLANATION

Modification of the existing MRLs for metaldehyde in various crops 1

CONCLUSION ON PESTICIDE PEER REVIEW

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Reasoned opinion on the setting of import tolerances for acetochlor in soya beans and cotton seeds 1

Modification of the existing MRLs for dimethoate in various crops 1

Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for chlorpyrifos-methyl in kaki/japanese persimmon and granate apple/pomegranate

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide human health risk assessment of the active substance chlorpyrifos 1

KEYNOTE ( ) Page 1 of 31. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for phosmet in citrus fruits, pome fruits and rape seed 1

Modification of the existing MRLs for cyflufenamid in various crops 1

REASONED OPINION. Modification of the existing maximum residue level for captan in cranberries. Abstract

Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for 2,4-D according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1

REASONED OPINION. Modification of a maximum residue level for mepiquat in cotton seeds. Abstract

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FINAL

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residues levels (MRLs) for fluazifop-p in several commodities 1

MRL setting and intakes for cereals. Annette Petersen

Setting of MRLs for bixafen in oil seed rape, linseed, mustard seed and poppy seed 1

Pesticides 3.0. New contaminants. What are we talking about? And how to evaluate the new substances? Dr. Silke Bruns Lach & Bruns Partnerschaft

Procedural advice on the submission of variations for annual update of human influenza inactivated vaccines applications in the centralised procedure

5.10 DIFENOCONAZOLE (224)

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Safety of the Food Chain Pesticides and Biocides Insert Active substance name MRL application form (SANCO 4044/2008 rev. 10.2) Insert applicant's name Page 1/10

Part A 1 Purpose of the application 1 : 1.1 Set specific maximum residue level(s) (new active substance not mentioned in Annex II/III/IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005) 1.2 Set specific maximum residue level(s) (changing current EU MRL listed in Annex II or III of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1.3 Set import tolerance(s) (new active substance not mentioned in Annex II/III/IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005) 1.4 Set import tolerance(s) (changing current EU MRL listed in Annex II or III of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005) 1.5 Delete maximum residue level(s) 1.6 Include an active substance in Annex IV 1.7 Amend existing residue definition 1.8 Include active substance/product combinations into Annex VII as referred to in Article 18 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1.9 Evaluation of confirmatory data following review according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 Evaluating Member State (EMS) Rapporteur Member State (RMS) 2 Applicant 2.1 Party requesting an authorisation or a provisional authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 (Art. 6.1 of Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005). 2.2 Parties demonstrating through adequate evidence a legitimate interest in health, including organisations of civil society (Article 6.2 of Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 ) 2.3 Parties concerned with a commercial interest such as manufacturers, growers, importers and producers of products covered by Annex I of Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 (Article 6.2 of Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 ) 2.4 Member State of the European Community (Article 6.3 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005) 2.5 Party requesting an import tolerance (Art. 6.4 of Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005) 1 Please tick all relevant boxes. Page 2/10

3 Details on the status of evaluation Date 3.1 Evaluation under Regulation (EC) No / / (date of confirmed receipt of 1107/2009 pending 2 dossier by RMS) 3.2 Evaluation under Regulation (EC) No / / (scheduled date of 1107/2009 scheduled 2 submission to RMS) 3.3 Evaluation under Regulation (EC) No / / (date of confirmed receipt of 844/2012 pending 3 dossier by RMS) 3.4 Evaluation under Regulation (EC) No / / (scheduled date of 844/2012 scheduled 3 submission to RMS) 4 Details Concerning Applicant 4.1 Company code (if known) 4.2 Company/organisation/Member State 4.3 Contact person Title First name Surname 4.4 Address Street Street number Addition to street number Town/city Postcode Country 4.5 Telephone Dialling code Telephone number 4.6 Telefax Dialling code Telephone number 2 MRL applications to be submitted in accordance with the approval procedure of Regulation 1107/2009 (Art. 8(1) g. According to that Article 8(1)g a copy of an application for a MRL as referred to in Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 or a justification for not supplying such information should be included. 3 MRL applications to be submitted in accordance with the renewal procedure Reg. 844/2012. According to Art. 7(1)(i) of Reg. 844/2012, a copy of an application for a MRL as referred to in Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 should be included 2005 or a justification for not supplying such information should be included. Page 3/10

4 Details Concerning Applicant 4.7 E-mail 5 Information on the Plant Protection Product Used 5.1 Trade name for the plant protection product 5.2 Type of formulation 6 Active Substance for which the MRL Application is to be Submitted 6.1 Active substance number 6.2 Active substance (ISO common name) English 6.3 IUPAC name 6.4 CAS no. - - 6.5 Use category/categories (eg. insecticide) 6.6 Is the active substance also used in biocides? 6.7 Is the active substance also used in veterinary drugs? 7 Content of that Active Substance in the Formulation 7.1 Declared content of pure active substance Unit 7.2 Is the active substance available as a variant (e. g. ethyl ester, sodium salt)? 7.3 Active substance variant (code) 7.4 Active substance variant (name) 7.5 Remarks 8 Name and content of other active substances (repeat data for each additional active substance) 8.1 Active substance number 8.2 Active substance (ISO common name) English 8.3 IUPAC name 8.4 CAS no. - - Page 4/10

8.5 Declared content of pure active substance 9 Residue definitions for 4 9.1 Active substance number 9.2 Active substance (ISO common name) English 9.3 Monitoring purposes (plant) 9.4 Risk assessment (plant) 9.5 Monitoring purposes (animal) 9.6 Risk assessment (animal) 4 In case the applicant asked to check the impact of a new residue definition existing (first line) and new (second line) definition should be stated in each case. Page 5/10

10 Product(s) of Plant or Animal Origin as listed in Annex I of regulation (EC) No 396/2005 Code Name Additional lines to be added if necessary Proposed MRL NB: Footnote to be added in case of application for import tolerance(s) 5 Current EU MRL 5 In case of import tolerances insert for each tolerance reference to the corresponding national legislation of the exporting country concerning the MRL or a clarification should be given if no MRLs are established in the originating country Page 6/10

11 Enclosed Documents According to Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 11.1 A summary of the application (Article 7.1.b.i) 11.2 The main substantive arguments (Article 7.1.b.ii) [applicant s conclusions] 11.3 An index of the documentation enclosed (Article 7.1.b.iii) 11.4 A copy of the relevant Good Agricultural Practice applying to the specific use of the active substance (Article 7.1.b.iv) [see Annex I for template] 11.5 A comprehensive overview of relevant concerns raised in the available scientific literature about the plant protection product and/or its residue (Article 7.1.c) 11.6 The data listed in Commission Regulation (EU) No 544/2011 6 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 545/2011 7 relating to data requirements for the setting of maximum residue limits for pesticides including, where appropriate, toxicological data and data on routine analytical methods for use in control laboratories, as well as plant and animal metabolism data (Article 7.1.d) Part B 1 Further information requested by MS to cover requirements on national procedures 1.1 In addition to point 4: - Details concerning leading company - Details concerning authorisation holder - Details concerning representative in the entire MS 1.2 Connection between application for MRL and national authorisation/approval 1.3 In addition to point 5: Further information on the plant protection product like authorisations in other MS, authorisation number in that MS 1.4 In addition to point 6: Further information on the approved and/or pending MRLs for biocides and/or veterinary products 1.5 In addition to point 11: - In addition other description of GAP (having the same elements as Annex I) - Additional documentation like residue summary form - Spraying intervals 1.6 Summary Form Supervised Residue Trials 1.7 Remarks, if necessary 6 Data requirements for active substances in the version in place at time of application 7 Data requirements for plant protection products in the version in place at time of application Page 7/10

Part C For evaluating Member States only. 1 Details on the status of evaluation Date 1.1 Request to change current EU MRL under Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 / / (date of receipt of MRL application in MS) Date Signature of the applicant Page 8/10

Annex I (GAP Form) SUMMARY OF GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES FOR PESTICIDE USES (Application on agricultural and horticultural crops) Use Pattern Crop and/or situation (a) Member State or Country For Import Tolerance Product name NEU SEU or G (b) Pests or Group of pests controlled (c) Preparation Application Application rate per treatment Type (d-f) Conc. a.s. (i) method kind (f-h) range of growth stages & season (j) number min-max (k) Interval between application (min) kg a.s /hl min-max (l) Water L/ha minmax kg a.s./ha min-max (l) PHI (days) (m) Remarks (a) For crops, the EU and Codex classifications (both) should be taken into account; where relevant, the use situation should be described (e.g. fumigation of a structure) (b) NEU: outdoor field use in Northern EU, SEU: outdoor field use in Southern EU, State: Member state (MS) or country for Import tolerance, G: glasshouse or indoor application (c) e.g. biting and sucking insects, soil born insects, foliar fungi, weeds (d) e.g. wettable powder (WP), emulsifiable concentrate (EC), granule (GR) (e) CropLife International Technical Monograph no 2, 6th Edition. Revised May 2008. Catalogue of pesticide (f) All abbreviations used must be explained (g) Method, e.g. high volume spraying, low volume spraying, spreading, dusting, drench (h) Kind, e.g. overall, broadcast, aerial spraying, row, individual plant, between the plant- type of equipment used must be indicated (i) g/kg or g/l. Normally the rate should be given for the active substance (according to ISO) and not for the variant in order to compare the rate for same active substances used in different variants (e.g. fluoroxypyr). In certain cases, where only one variant is synthesised, it is more appropriate to give the rate for the variant (e.g. benthiavalicarb-isopropyl). (j) Growth stage range from first to last treatment (BBCH Monograph, Growth Stages of Plants, 1997, Blackwell, ISBN 3-8263-3152-4), including where relevant, information on season at time of application (k) Indicate the minimum and maximum number of applications possible under practical conditions of use (l) The values should be given in g or kg whatever gives the more manageable number (e.g. 200 kg/ha instead of 200 000 g/ha or 12.5 g/ha instead of 0.0125 kg/ha (m) PHI - minimum pre-harvest interval Page 9/10

Page 10/10