NCVD-PCI Registry. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Registry, MALAYSIA c/o National Heart Association of Malaysia

Similar documents
APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

New Jersey Cardiac Catheterization Data Registry, Version 2.0 (Please report data only for patients 16 years or older.)

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Without On-site Cardiac Surgery

Patient. Clinical data Indications: Operation date. Comorbidities: Patient code Birth date: / /

Unprotected LM intervention

Percutaneous Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Disease

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

Bifurcation stenting with BVS

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

LM stenting - Cypher

Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea * Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea

2/26/2013. NCDR.13 Case Scenario Presentation Cath PCI Registry. Disclosures. Objectives. Dashboard Implications of Some Major Metrics

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

NCDR CathPCI Registry v4.4 Diagnostic Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry

National Intervention Council

Alex versus Xience Registry Preliminary report

Management of Non-protected Left-Main Bifurcation without Drug Eluting Stent. Masahiko Ochiai MD, FACC, FESC, FSCAI

TRIAS HR Pilot Study

Supplementary Online Content

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

STEMI ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Target vessel only revascularization versus complet revascularization in non culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

Thrombus Aspiration in ST- Elevation myocardial infarction in Scandinavia (TASTE trial)

Are Asian Patients Different? - Updates Of Biomatrix Experience In Regional Settings: BEACON II (3 Yr F up) &

When Aspiration Thrombectomy Does Not Work? A A R O N W O N G N A T I O N A L H E A R T C E N T R E S I N G A P O R E

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

Perioperative Management After Coronary Stenting: Risk Assessment Before Surgery. Christian Seiler No conflict of interest to declare.

Prevention of Coronary Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis

Final Clinical and Angiographic Results From a Nationwide Registry of FIREBIRD Sirolimus- Eluting Stent: Firebird In China (FIC) Registry (PI R. Gao)

Unprotected left main coronary stenting with a second generation drug-eluting stent. One-year clinical follow-up of the LeMaX pilot study.

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Upgrade of Recommendation

Lésions du tronc commun: Reste t il une place pour la chirugie? Pierre Deharo, CHU TIMONE, Marseille

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

Who is the high risk patient?

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Side Branch Occlusion

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

Clinical case in perspective. Cases from Poland

Usefulness of OCT during coronary intervention

Case Report Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in an Acute Myocardial Infarction Due to the Occlusion of the Left Main Coronary Artery

Radiation Safety Abbott Vascular. All rights reserved.

FFR vs. icecg in Coronary Bifurcations (FIESTA) - preliminary results. Dobrin Vassilev MD, PhD National Heart Hospital Sofia, Bulgaria

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

Emergency surgery in acute coronary syndrome

Coronary Artery Perforation Angioplasty Summit Seoul April 30, 2005

DEB experience in Gachon Universtiy Gil Hospital (in ISR) Soon Yong Suh MD., PhD. Heart Center Gachon University Gil Hospital Seoul, Korea.

For Personal Use. Copyright HMP 2013

Left Main and Bifurcation Summit I. Lessons from European LM Studies

in an Unyielding Patient Dr Jason See, Dr Goh Yew Seong, Dr Rohit Khurana Changi General Hospital Singapore

Downloaded from:

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

GRAND ROUNDS - DILEMMAS IN ANTICOAGULATION AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPY. Nick Collins February 2017

COMPARE Trial Elvin Kedhi Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

1. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse clinical and angiographic outcomes even in acute myocardial Infarction (AMI) patients.

PCI for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis. Jean Fajadet Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France

Antonio Colombo. Centro Cuore Columbus and S. Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Miracor Symposium. Speaker: 15. Parigi: May 16-19, 2017

Peri-procedural Outcome of Small Vessel Coronary Stenting

ANGIOPLASY SUMMIT 2007 TCT ASIA PACIFIC. Seoul, Korea: April The problem is exaggerated: Data from Real World Registries

TCT mdbuyline.com Clinical Trial Results Summary

ΑΝΤΙΜΕΤΩΠΙΣΗ ΑΣΘΕΝΩΝ ΜΕ ΝΟΣΟ ΣΤΕΛΕΦΟΥΣ

Count Down to COMBAT

Update interventional Cardiology Hans Rickli St.Gallen

Declaration of conflict of interest NONE

Cardiologic history. Anamnesis. Female BD Risk factors HTN, DM, Dyslipidaemia. Cardiologic Long history. Last admission Heart failure

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

The Case for Multivessel Revascularization in Shock

EXAMINATION trial. Manel Sabaté Hospital Clínic, Barcelona (On behalf of the Examination Investigators)

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

ΑΝΤΙΓΝΩΜΙΕΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΠΕΜΒΑΤΙΚΗ ΚΑΡΔΙΟΛΟΓΙΑ:Νόσος στελέχους Αγγειοπλαστική

Timing of Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Basics of Angiographic Interpretation Analysis of Angiography

Acute Myocardial Infarction. Willis E. Godin D.O., FACC

Trial Update- TOTAL. Jonathan Byrne

Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting

Ziyad Ghazzal MD, FACC, FSCAI Professor of Medicine Deputy Vice President/Dean Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs American University of Beirut

Left Main Intervention: Will it become standard of care?

8th Emirates Cardiac Society Congress in collaboration with ACC Middle East Conference Dubai: October Acute Coronary Syndromes

Euro-Asia CTO Club Can we Implement Japanese Techniques in Europe?

Case Presentation #1

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Declaration of conflict of interest. Nothing to disclose

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Jun-Won Lee, Sang Wook Park, Jung-Woo Son, Young Jin Youn, Min-Soo Ahn, Sung Gyun Ahn, Jang-Young Kim, Byung-Soo Yoo, Junghan Yoon, Seung-Hwan Lee

Left Main Intervention: Where are we in 2015?

The Japanese Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of Sirolimus-Coated Bx VELOCITY Balloon-Expandable Stent in Patients With de novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Le# main treatment with Stentys stent. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

STENTYS for Le, Main Sten2ng. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

OBJECTIVES. New Twist To Old Disease: Cardiovascular Update /9/2017. Prevention Pre-operative Coronary Artery Disease

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

Transcription:

NCVD-PCI Registry National Cardiovascular Disease Database (NCVD) National Cardiovascular Disease Database (NCVD) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Registry, MALAYSIA c/o National Heart Association of Malaysia

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NCVD-PCI REGISTRY

NCVD-PCI Registry, 2007-2012 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Total number of patients Total number of PCI procedures performed Ttl Total number of lesions treated Total number of stents used 3,618 3,374 3,610 4,106 4,293 4,895 23,896 3,928 3,654 3,916 4,405405 4,679 5,299 25,881 5,455 4,944 5,139 6,043 5,901 6,834 34,316 6,462 5,767 5,887 6,828 6,692 7,611 39,247

tients who und derwent PCI Pe ercentage of pa Age Group of Patients Who Underwent PCI, NCVD PCI Registry, 2007-20092009 Age group of patients who underwent PCI, NCVD PCI Registry, 2007 2009 40 36.8 35 30 25 20 27.1 20.2 15 10 5 0 11.1 3.9 02 0.2 07 0.7 20 <30 30 <40 40 <50 50 <60 60 <70 70 <80 >= 80 Age group Mean (SD) of patients age = 57 (10) years Min, Max of age = 22, 95 years

Percentage of patients who underwent PCI by Gender, NCVD PCI Registry, 2007-2009 2009 Percentage of patients who underwent PCI by gender, NCVD PCI Registry, 2007 2009 Female 19% M Male 81%

Percentage of patients who underwent PCI by ethnic group, NCVD PCI Registry, 2007-2009 2009 Other Malaysian includes Kadazan Dusun, Bidayuh, Bajau, Melanau, Murut, Iban & Punjabi

Previous Revascularization Previous 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 revascularization (%) (n=3618) (n=3374) (n=3610) (n=4405) (n=4679) (n=5299) Previous PCI 22.8 22.0 24.7 24.1 22.2 21.8 Previous CABG 3.6 4.7 3.9 4.9 3.5 3.7

Clinical Background and CV Risk Factors Medical history (%) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (n=3618) (n=3374) (n=3610) (n=4405) (n=4679) (n=5299) Dyslipidaemia 76.6 70.2 73.2 77.0 75.9 63.1 Hypertension 74.4 71.7 74.5 74.3 75.0 71.5 Diabetes 45.7 45.2 47.5 48.4 45.8 43.5 Smoking status Former (quit > 30 days) Current (any tobacco use within last 30 days) 28.7 15.9 25.6 20.2 30.9 19.8 31.7 20.2 29.5 22.1 25.1 24.4 Family history of CVD 16.4 15.1 25.4 19..1 15.5 12.8 History of heart failure 3.3 3.3 5.4 4.4 3.7 2.0 Chronic renal failure (include all pts with creatinine >200micromol/l) 59 5.9 62 6.2 77 7.7 69 6.9 55 5.5 42 4.2 STEMI 21.8 23.8 17.0

PCI status PCI status (%) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (n=3928) (n=3654) (n=3916) (n=4405) (n=4679) (n=5299) Elective 90.2 90.9 89.2 88.3 85.8 82.3 NSTEMI/UA 4.8 4.7 4.2 6.0 5.4 5.4 AMI 4.6 4.2 6.2 5.8 8.7 12.3 Primary PCI 4.6 4.2 6.2 2.6 2.1 3.5 *

Medication (%) Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy PCI 2007 (n=3928) 2008 (n=3654) 2009 (n=3916) 2010 (n=4405) 2011 (n=4679) 2012 (n=5299) Thrombolytics 19.5 22.9 17.7 5.1 6.5 8.2 IIb/ IIIa 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.4 4.1 3.7 Blockade Heparin 90.0 89.0 96.0 98.6 97.7 97.7 LMWH 5.0 4.0 4.0 2.3 2.5 2.8 Ticlopidine idi 40 4.0 30 3.0 30 3.0 20 2.0 10 1.0 07 0.7 Aspirin 95.0 97.0 98.0 96.3 98.5 98.3 Clopidogrel 98.0 98.0 99.0 97.3 98.3 98.4 Fondaparinux 2.2 3.4 4.9

Percutaneous entry (%) Percutaneous Entry 2007 (n=3928) 2008 (n=3654) 2009 (n=3916) 2010 (n=4405) 2011 (n=4679) 2012 (n=5299) Brachial 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.5 Radial 36.0 39.0 44.0 43.8 43.1 50.5 Femoral 63.0 59.0 54.0 54.3 50.7 40.1 Extent of Coronary Artery Disease Extent of coronary 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 disease (%) (n=3928) (n=3654) (n=3916) (n=4405) (n=4679) (n=5299) Single vessel disease 43.4 44.5 50.3 52.4 52.1 36.0 Multiple vessel disease 55.3 55.2 49.1 45.7 32.7 41.4 Graft 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.5 0.5 1.1

Lesion characteristics 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (n=5455) (n=4948) (n=5139) (n=6043) (n=5901) (n=6834) Lesion result (%) Successful 94 94 96 97 97 97 Unsuccessful 3 3 3 3 3 3 Lesion type (%) A 11 12 14 11 10 9 B1 23 26 31 28 26 22 B2 19 21 27 26 29 20 C 45 36 26 35 29 47 67%

Lesion Description Lesion description 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (%) (n=5455) (n=4948) (n=5139) (n=6043) (n=5901) (n=6834) Ostial 7 6 8 8 7 5 Bifurcation 8 8 9 17 7 7 Total occlusion (< 3 mo) 3 3 2 6 7 6 CTO > 3 mo 8 7 7 8 9 6 Thrombus 3 3 4 3 3 3

Anatomical location of lesions, NCVD-PCI, 2007-2009

Summary of location of lesions treated with ihpci, NCVD PCI Registry, 2007 2012 Location of l 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 lesion (n=5455) (n=4948) (n=5139) (n=6043) (n=5901) (n=6043) LMS 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.5 2.4 2.2 LAD 30.1 27.77 30.00 47.2 48.0 47.1 RCA 30.1 27.7 30.0 29.5 30.2 31.6 LCx 18.11 18.2 18.4 19.0 18.0 17.77 Graft 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.6 1.4 1.3

Device (%) Intracoronary Devices Used 2007 (n=5455) 2008 (n=4948) 2009 (n=5139) 2010 (n=6043) 2011 (n=5901) 2012 (n=6043) Bll Balloon only 80 8.0 80 8.0 80 8.0 80 8.0 60 6.0 50 5.0 Drug Eluting Balloon 0.05 1.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 Cutting Balloon Bll 20 2.0 20 2.0 20 2.0 20 2.0 17 1.7 12 1.2 IVUS 2.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 3.3 2.5 Rotablator 10 1.0 10 1.0 10 1.0 11 1.1 09 0.9 07 0.7 Drug Eluting Stent (DES) 43.0 49.0 53.0 65.0 64.0 70.0 BareMetal Stent (BMS) 43.0 35.0 33.0 21.0 21.0 17.0 Distal Embolic Protection 0.05 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6

Procedure Characteristics 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (n=5455) (n=4948) (n=5139) (n=6043) (n=5901) (n=6043) Estimated lesion 24.4 23.7 22.4 24.1 23.9 23.3 length (mm) (15.2) (14.4) (2.8) (15.7) (14.3) (14.0) Stent length 30.4 29.2 28.9 (mm) (17.6) (16.6) 6) (16.7) Stent diameter (mm) Maximum stent/balloon deploy pressure (atm) 23.2 (7.7) 22.2 (7.7) 22.8 (7.6) 3.1 (0.6) 3.1 (0.6) 3.1 (0.6) 2.95 (0.5) 2.95 (0.5) 3.0 (1.6) 15.7 (3.7) 15.8 (3.9) 15.4 (4.0) 15.7 (3.9) 15.9 (4.2) 15.7 (4.1) Stents/ Lesion 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

Target vessel complications Type of complication 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (%) (n=5455) (n=4948) (n=5139) (n=6043) (n=5901) (n=6043) Acute closure 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 Dissection post procedure 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 1.6 1.0 Perforation 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 Persistent no reflow 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.1

Complication (%) 2007 Periprocedural major MI Emergency Reintervention Procedural complications 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (n=3928) (n=3654) (n=3916) (n=4405) (n=4679) (n=5299) 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.1 Bail out CABG 0.03 0.05 0.1 Cardiogenic shock (post procedure) 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 Arrhythmia (VT/VF/Brady) 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 TIA/ Stroke 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.1 Tamponade 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.2 Contrast reaction 01 0.1 008 0.08 005 0.05 01 0.1 New renal impairment 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 New onset/worsened heart failure 0.2 0.03 0.08 0.1

Year *Outcome (No., %) 2007 (N=3618) Patient Outcome Duration At discharge 30-day** 6-month** 1 year** Death 39 (1) 46 (1) 52 (1) 61 (2) Alive 3579 (99) 1723 (48) 1300 (36) 1117 (31) Lost to Follow Up - 1849 (51) 2266 (63) 2440 (67) 2008 Death 43 (1) 53 (1) 67 (2) 76 (3) (N=3374) Alive 3331 (99) 2665 (79) 1793 (53) 1527 (45) 2009 + (N=3610) Lost to Follow Up - 656 (20) 1514 (45) 1771 (52) Death 41 (1) 57 (1) 75 (3) 84 (4) Alive 3569 (99) 3175 (88) 2414 (67) 1959 (55) Lost to Follow Up - 378 (11) 1121 (31) 1567 (43) Overall Death 123 (1) 156 (2) 194 (2) 221 (2) (N=10602) Alive 10479 (99) 7563 (71) 5507 (52) 4603 (43) Lost to Follow Up - 2883 (27) 3781 (46) 4212 (55) The outcome data is derived based on data matching with the National Death Register ** Including patients who died in hospital + For year 2009, total for 6-month and 1-year follow up were based on cases registered in the database

Patient Outcome Outcome at 2007* 2008* 2009* 2010 + 2011 + 2012 + discharge, % (n=3618) (n=3374) (n=3610) (n=4405) (n=4679) (n=5299) Alive 99 99 99 99 97 97 Death 1 (n=39) 1 (n=43) 1 (n=41) 1 (n=49) 2 (n=92) 2 (n=97) * Referred to the NCVD PCI Registry Annual Report 2007 2009 * Based on real time data analysis

Percentage of death by age group, NCVD-PCI Registry, 2007-2009 70 Pe ercentage e of patie nts 60 50 40 30 20 10 Young Middle aged Elderly 0 At discharge (n=123) 30 day (n=156) 6 month (n=194) 1 year (n=221) Outcome Note: The percentage of death reflect the cumulative deaths Note: The outcome data has been derived based on data matching with National Death Register data Note: Young is defined as age from 20 to less than 40 years, middle-aged is defined as age between 40 to less than 60 years and elderly is defined as 60 years and above

Percentage of death by diabetic status, NCVD-PCI Registry, 2007-20092009 70 60 61 60 63 64 Per rcentage of patient 50 40 30 32 20 34 32 31 Diabetic Non diabetic 10 0 At Discharge (n=123) 30 day (n=156) 6 month (n=194) 1 year (n=221) Outcome Note: The percentage of death reflect the cumulative deaths Note: The outcome data has been derived based on data matching with National Death Register data

Gender difference, NCVD PCI 2007 20092009

Differences in Mortality Following PCI, in Diabetics Outcome, No. Outcome at 30 day 6 month 12 months (%) discharge Diabetic Non Diabetic Diabetic Non Diabetic Diabetic Non Diabetic Diabetic Non Diabetic Death 22 (2) 13 (1) 26 (3) 16 (2) 30 (5) 18 (2) 35 (7) 22 (3) 2009 2008 2 007 Alive 1632 1878 745 944 549 721 466 628 (98) (99) (96) (96) (93) (96) (91) (93) Lost to follow up 24 (3) 22 (2) 10 (2) 14 (2) 12 (2) 27 (4) Death 22 (1) 18 (1) 27 (2) 22 (1) 38 (4) 25 (2) 44 (6) 28 (3) Alive 1502 (98) 1764 (99) 1192 (95) 1423 (95) Lost to follow up 38 (3) 46 (4) 51 (6) 70 (7) 45 (4) 50 (6) Death 31 (2) 8 (0) 40 (2) 15 (1) 54 (4) 19 (1) 63 (6) 19 (2) Alive 1685 (99) 1806 (100) 1527 (94) 1597 (94) 813 (90) 1172 (94) 943 (91) 1224 (95) 689 (90) 952 (92) 801 (91) 1000 (95) Lost to follow up 53 (4) 93 (5) 20 (2) 44 (4) 21 (2) 39 (3) Higher in Diabetics