A Tailored Approach for Growth Modification: An Innovative Approach

Similar documents
Management of Severe Class II Malocclusion with Fixed Functional Appliance: Forsus

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

Nonextraction Treatment of Class I Malocclusion having Anterior Crowding and Multiple Canine Impactions

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Treatment of a severe class II division 1 malocclusion with twin-block appliance

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Nonextraction Management of Class II Malocclusion Using Powerscope: A Case Report

Different Non Surgical Treatment Modalities for Class III Malocclusion

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Removable appliances

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Maxillary Growth Control with High Pull Headgear- A Case Report

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

Correlation Between Naso Labial Angle and Effective Maxillary and Mandibular Lengths in Untreated Class II Patients

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Correction of Midface Retrusion in a Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

ACTIVATOR: SIMPLE YET EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE FOR SKELETAL CLASS II CORRECTION: CASE REPORT... ABSTRACT:...

This paper reports a case treated by a serial extraction program at the mixed dentition

Early Mixed Dentition Period

Skeletal And DentoalveolarChanges Seen In Class II Div 1 Mal- Occlusion Cases Treated With Twin Block Appliance- A Cephalometric Study

Orthodontics-surgical combination therapy for Class III skeletal malocclusion

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN BOARD OF ORTHODONTISTS APPENDIX 1 CASE PRESENTATION 2005

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

Non extraction treatment of growing skeletal class II malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Appliance- A Case Report

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

mandibular deficiency and maxillary and mandibular crowding: follow-up evaluation

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Orthodontic treatment of midline diastema related to abnormal frenum attachment - A case series.

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Twin Block appliance. A Systematic Review.

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

Orthodontic treatment for jaw defor. Sakamoto, T; Sakamoto, S; Harazaki, Author(s) Yamaguchi, H. Journal Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, 4

Comparison between conventional Twin block and a modified Essix twin block in adolescents with Class II malocclusion

Definition and History of Orthodontics

CHIN CUP: STILL A HAND TO HELP

Treatment Effects of Twin-Block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the Correction of Class II Malocclusion

Management of Severe Class II Division 1 Malocclusion with Hybrid Functional Appliance by Double Advancement A Case Report

Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Gummy Smile with Vertical Maxillary Excess

Developing Facial Symmetry Using an Intraoral Device: A Case Report

Treatment of Angle Class III. Department of Paedodontics and Orthodontics Dr. habil. Melinda Madléna associate professor

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

Sample Case #1. Disclaimer

The practice of orthodontics is faced with new

SURGICAL - ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION IN AN ADULT PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

The Tip-Edge appliance and

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Non-surgical management of skeletal malocclusions: An assessment of 100 cases

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

Management of severe Class II malocclusion with sequential removable functional and orthodontic appliances: a case for MorthRCSEd examination

Ortho-surgical Management of Severe Vertical Dysplasia: A Case Report

Several studies have shown that a Twin-block appliance

The effect of tooth agenesis on dentofacial structures

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Case Report: Early Correction of Class III Malocclusion with alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion And Constriction (Alt-RAMEC) and Face Mask Therapy

Fixed appliances II. Dr. Káldy Adrienn, Semmeweis University

Management of Crowded Class 1 Malocclusion with Serial Extractions: Report of a Case

Compromised nonsurgical treatment of a patient with a severe Class III malocclusion

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

The Dynamax System: A New Orthopedic Appliance

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Research methodology University of Turku, Finland

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

Orthodontic mini-implants have revolutionized

Case Report Orthodontic Treatment of a Mandibular Incisor Extraction Case with Invisalign

Functional Appliances

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation

Skeletal Anchorage for Orthodontic Correction of Severe Maxillary Protrusion after Previous Orthodontic Treatment

Combined use of digital imaging technologies: ortho-surgical treatment

Molar distalisation with skeletal anchorage

ORTHO-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS III MALOCCLUSION WITH SEVERE TOOTH SIZE ARCH LENGTH DISCREPANCY

A cephalometric evaluation of skeletal class II patients treated with premolar extraction and fixed functional appliance (Forsus)

The most common maxillary characteristics of

FIXED FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE: POWERSCOPE -A CASE SERIES

Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Case Report Diagnosis and Treatment of Pseudo-Class III Malocclusion

The changes of soft tissue profile. skeletal class II patients with mandibular retrognathy treated with extraction of maxillary first premolars

Mandibular Cervical Headgear vs Rapid Maxillary Expander and Facemask for Orthopedic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion

Nonextraction treatment plans for Angle Class II

Fixed Twin Blocks. Guidelines for case selection are similar to those for removable Twin Block appliances.

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

Transcription:

wjd S RPORT 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1461 Tailored pproach for rowth Modification: n Innovative pproach 1 Narendra Sharma, 2 Sunita Shrivastav, 3 Ranjit Kamble, 4 Preethi Sharma STRT im: The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment effects of the clear block appliance during comprehensive correction of class II malocclusion in growing patients. Introduction: Sagittal discrepancy commonly exists in skeletal class II malocclusions. The popular of the class II malocclusions is division 1 type among them. The presence of original skeletal jaw abnormality is the origin of the class II malocclusions. The treatment result of such skeletal malocclusion depends on the age, latent growth, and cooperation of the individual. The class II division 1 malocclusion in a growing individual can be successfully treated with different types of myofunctional appliance. The present article illustrates a new approach (clear block appliance) to correct sagittal discrepancy to make optimal use of the patient s pubertal growth spurt to achieve best possible results. ased on the results in these patients, the clear block appliance was very effective in correcting class II malocclusions. lthough the results are positive, they should be tested on a large sample size. linical significance: lear block appliance proved to be the best alternative to other myofunctional appliances, where side effects in the form of anchorage loss or proclination of lower incisor do not occur with similar results. Keywords: lear block appliance, entofacial orthopedics, rowing skeletal class II malocclusion, Orthodontics. ow to cite this article: Sharma N, Shrivastav S, Kamble R, Sharma P. Tailored pproach for rowth Modification: n Innovative pproach. World J ent 2017;8(4):334-342. Source of support: Nil onflict of interest: None INTROUTION mong the different forms of class II malocclusion, class II division 1 is frequently seen. s indicated by McNamara, in children of class II division 1 malocclusion with latent growth, the most frequent element is increase in overjet and retroposition of mandible. It is most of the time made complex by the presence of original skeletal jaw inconsistency, due to forwardly placed maxilla, 1-3 epartment of Orthodontics, Sharad Pawar ental ollege & ospital, Wardha, Maharashtra, India 4 epartment of Oral Pathology, Sharad Pawar ental ollege & ospital, Wardha, Maharashtra, India orresponding uthor: Narendra Sharma, epartment of Orthodontics, Sharad Pawar ental ollege & ospital, Wardha Maharashtra, India, e-mail: sharmanarendra047@gmail. com retroposition mandible, or a combined effect of both. The treatment result of such skeletal malocclusion depends on the age, latent growth, and cooperation of patient. 1 To treat the skeletal jaw discrepancy, measures undertaken for favorable growth changes can be carried out during the late mixed or early permanent dentition before the completion of latent growth. In individuals whose growth spurts are toward the end or who are uncooperative, fixed functional appliance can be used such as Jasper jumper, erbst appliance or forsus fatigue resistance devices. In the patients with less discrepancy and toward the end of growth potential, it is impossible to carry out growth modification procedures. Such cases, with the discrepancy in skeletal jaw bases, can be addressed by orthodontics with or without extractions and orthognathic surgery. In the individuals with no growth potential where the jaw discrepancy is more, the combined orthodontic and orthognathic surgeries can provide best treatment results. 2-5 ppliance Skeletal class II cases where mandible is retrognathic and with increased overjet are selected for clear block therapy. This appliance has no wire components with possibility of reduction in overjet with no undesired incisor proclination. Timing of Treatment The best time to deliver clear block appliance to correct class II malocclusion is during pubertal growth spurt to utilize maximum treatment effect and trim down the time required for retention. ppliance abrication The appliance is fabricated as described (igs 1 ): Impressions and working model preparation. ite registration is taken with advancement of mandible so that the molars are in class I relation and interincisal opening should not be more than 2 mm. Make a cut in a wax bite with angle of 45 to 60 (ig. 1). Place a clear thermoplastic sheet over vacuum press along with wax bite block on cast (ig. 1). 334

WJ Tailored pproach for rowth Modification igs 1 to : Steps in fabrication of clear block appliance ewaxing: fter trimming excess sheet, keep them in hot water to remove wax from the plates and remnant of wax from working models. crylization: ill the self-curing acrylic resin of the proper consistency in the wax block space. Keep the plate back on the cast. fter setting of acrylic resin, remove the plates and trim the edges of clear block appliance (ig. 1). Trying of clear block appliance: Upper and lower plates are inserted in the mouth and the patient is asked to close the mandible in a forward position. S RPORTS ase 1 male aged 13 years with labially placed upper anterior teeth and unpleasant esthetics had come to the epartment of Orthodontics to seek treatment. xtraoral examination showed convex profile with retrognathic mandible. Intraoral examination showed late permanent dentition stage with U -shaped dental arches and the maxillary anterior proclined. Molars were in class II relationship with overjet of 8 mm and deep bite of 5 mm in occlusion World Journal of entistry, July-ugust 2017;8(4):334-342 335

igs 2 to : Pretreatment extraoral and intraoral photographs of case 1 (ig. 2). The cephalogram showed point, nasion, point angle (N) angle of 7. The sella-nasion-subspinale (SN) angle measuring 80 showed that maxilla was normal with respect to the anterior cranial base. The SN angle measuring 73 showed retrognathic mandible with respect to the anterior cranial base. The maxillary incisors were in labial version (ig. 3). iagnosis lass II skeletal and dental relation was with normal growth pattern of the mandible. Treatment Plan Interception of class II skeletal relationship by growth modification procedure with clear block appliance therapy (ig. 4), followed by fixed orthodontic appliance for finishing and detailing of occlusion. 336 RSULTS lear block appliance significantly improved the class II skeletal and dental relationships with improvement in soft tissue facial contour, along with lip competency with decrease in the overjet and deep bite (ig. 5). The cephalometric analysis (ig. 6) after clear block appliance therapy showed favorable growth of the mandible. There was a decrease in the N angle. The posttreatment SN measuring 78 indicates the favorable growth of mandible. Pre and postcorrection cephalometric values are shown in Table 1. ase 2 girl aged 12 years presented with chief complaint of forwardly placed upper anterior teeth with difficulty in closing lips. On extraoral examination, it was revealed that there was convex facial profile with protrusive,

WJ Tailored pproach for rowth Modification igs 3 and : () Pretreatment cephalogram; and () orthopantomogram of case 1 igs 4 to : lear block appliance delivered in case 1 hypotonic upper lip with 5 mm apart, everted lower lip, and retrognathic mandible. Intraoral examination showed U-shaped arches with proclined upper anterior with mild spacing between them and increases in overjet of 9 mm and overbite of 8 mm. There were a canine and molar in class II relationship (ig. 7). On tracing lateral cephalogram, the N angle measured 6. The SN angle measuring 81 showed that the maxilla was normal in relation to the anterior cranial base. The sella-nasion- point angle (SN) angle World Journal of entistry, July-ugust 2017;8(4):334-342 337

igs 5 to : Posttreatment extraoral and intraoral photographs of case 1 igs 6 and : () Posttreatment cephalogram; and () orthopantomogram of case 1 measuring 75 showed that mandible was retrognathic in relation to the anterior cranial base. The value for growth pattern showed horizontal growth pattern (ig. 8). 338 iagnosis lass II skeletal and dental relation with normal growth pattern of mandible.

WJ Tailored pproach for rowth Modification Table 1: Pretreatment and postfunctional cephalometric values of case 1 Parameter Pretreatment value Postfunctional SN 80 80 SN 73 78 N 7 2 Nasolabial angle 96 102 U1 to N 31 30 L1 to N 28 28 IMP 100 100 o-n to SN 30 31 Mandibular length (o-n) 102 mm 104 mm IMP: Incisor mandibular plane angle; o-n: onion-nathion; N: Nasion-point ; N: Nasion-point ; SN: Sella-nasion Treatment Plan rowth modulation to treat underline skeletal jaw discrepancy with clear block appliance therapy (ig. 9), followed by fixed orthodontic appliance for finishing and detailing of occlusion. RSULTS Skeletal and dental class I relationships were achieved with improvement in soft tissue facial outline, along with lip competency with reduction in the overjet and overbite (ig. 10). On tracings (ig. 11), it was found that there is reduction in the N angle of 3 with favorable growth of the mandible. The postcorrection SN angle measures 78. Pre and postcorrection cephalometric values are given in Table 2. ISUSSION lass II malocclusion presents several numbers of combinations of skeletal and dental features. ence, identifying the cause of class II malocclusion and forming the right approach are necessary for its correction. In general, it is believed that a skeletal class II malocclusion is frequently caused by maxilla positioned igs 7 to : Pretreatment extraoral and intraoral photographs of case 2 World Journal of entistry, July-ugust 2017;8(4):334-342 339

igs 8 and : () Pretreatment cephalogram; and () orthopantomogram of case 2 igs 9 to : lear block appliance delivered in case 2 340

WJ Tailored pproach for rowth Modification igs 10 to : Posttreatment extraoral and intraoral photographs of case 2 igs 11 and : () Posttreatment cephalogram; and () orthopantomogram of case 2 World Journal of entistry, July-ugust 2017;8(4):334-342 341

Table 2: Pretreatment and postfunctional cephalometric values of case 2 Parameter Pretreatment value Postfunctional SN 81 81 SN 75 78 N 6 3 Nasolabial angle 97 105 U1 to N 35 34 L1 to N 28 28 IMP 99 99 o-n to SN 27 28 Mandibular length (o-n) 100 mm 103 mm normal with a more retroposition mandible. uring the active growth period, it is best to take advantage of myofunctional appliances to correct skeletal relationship and modify the position of the mandible, both anteroposteriorly and vertically, by the stimulating effect at the condylar cartilage. orrection of mandible retrusion can be done using a variety of myofunctional appliances. very advocator of the different myofunctional appliances has considered more or less his own theory and working hypothesis: ndresen, aupl, and erren for the activator, alters for the bionator, Rolf rankel for the functional regulator, and lark for the Twin lock. 4-11 unctional appliances work in two ways: ither force application or force elimination. The new pattern of function using myofunctional appliances develops a new morphological prototype. It corrects the underline imbalance in muscle, thus changing tone of soft tissue and oronasopharyngeal complex function. Orthopedic effect of myofunctional appliances mainly influences the facial skeleton of growing individual by inducing alteration in condylar and sutural areas. The mandibular effect is observed along with the maxillary effect. When the mandible is constantly held forward by the appliance, the stretch of the soft tissues exerts a reactionary force toward the maxilla and slight maxillary restraint suggesting a headgear effect, serving to correct class II tendency. 12-14 The rationale of developing clear block appliance was to formulate a method that could modify the growth of jaws in desired direction and, i.e., simple, esthetic, and functional with least side effects on dentition. The clear block appliance modifies the growth of mandible with the following advantages. dvantages Only tooth-borne myofunctional appliance with no wire component No proclination of lower incisors as all teeth are covered with clear thermoplastic material ull-time wear except when brushing asy removal and insertion abrication is quick No need to articulate the cast on articulator Less breakage and adjustment than the other acrylic appliances and metallic fixed functional appliances. ONLUSION In the growing individual, interception of skeletal class II malocclusion by alteration in growth direction is the best treatment option for mandibular retrognathism, which can be achieved by myofunctional appliances. iagnosis and case selection are important. lear block appliance proved to be the best alternative to other myofunctional appliances, where side effects in the form of anchorage loss or proclination of lower incisor do not occur with similar results. RRNS 1. McNamara J Jr. omponents of lass II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. ngle Orthod 1981 Jul;51(1):177-202. 2. sieh TJ, Pinskaya Y, Roberts W. ssessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes: early treatment versus late treatment. ngle Orthod 2005 Mar;75(2):162-170. 3. Tulloch J, Phillips, Proffit WR. enefit of early lass II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. m J Orthod entofacial Orthop 1998 Jan;113(1):62-72, quiz 73-74. 4. ugoni S. omprehensive mixed dentition treatment. m J Orthod entofacial Orthop 1998 Jan;113(1):75-84. 5. King J, Keeling S, ocever R, Wheeler TT. The timing of treatment for lass II malocclusion in children; a literature review. ngle Orthod 1989 Summer;60(2):87-97. 6. owman SJ. One-stage versus two-stage treatment: are two really necessary? m J Orthod entofacial Orthop 1998 Jan;113(1):111-116. 7. White L. arly orthodontic intervention. m J Orthod entofacial Orthop 1998 Jan;113(1):24-28. 8. Wieslander L, Lagerström L. The effect of activator treatment on lass II malocclusions. m J Orthod 1979 Jan;75(1):20-26. 9. Yang Y, Kiyak. Orthodontic treatment timing: a survey of orthodontists. m J Orthod entofacial Orthop 1998 Jan;113(1):96-103. 10. hafari J, Shofer S, Jacobsson-unt U, Markowitz L, Laster LL. eadgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of lass II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. m J Orthod entofacial Orthop 1998 Jan;113(1):51-61. 11. ishara S. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated lass II division 1 malocclusion. m J Orthod entofacial Orthop 1998 Jun;113(3):661-673. 12. lark, WJ. The art of orthodontic. In: lark WJ, editor. Twin block functional therapy application in dentofacial orthopaedics. London: Mosby-Wolfe Publication; 2002. p. 2-4. 13. raber, TM.; Rakosi, T.; Petrovic,. Principles of functional appliances. entofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. St Louis (MO): Mosby; 1985. 14. Proffit, WR. Treatment of skeletal problems in children. In: Proffit WR, editor. ontemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby, lsevier Publication; 2007. p. 510-521. 342