Barriers and facilitators to vaccination in pregnancy: a qualitative study in Northern Ireland, 2017

Similar documents
Smith, J., & Noble, H. (2014). Bias in research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(4), DOI: /eb

Healthwatch Milton Keynes flu vaccination in pregnancy survey July 2018

UK Teratology Information Service Regional Drug & Therapeutics Centre Wolfson Unit Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH PARTICIPANT INFORMATION SHEET

I think women coming together and speaking is really great. Hearing other women s stories was very inspiring. To hear what they have been through and

Research made simple: What is grounded theory?

Unseen and unheard: women s experience of miscarriage many years after the event

Public Health England and NHS prepare for unpredictable flu season. At-risk groups in the West Midlands urged to take up free flu vaccination

2017/2018 Financial Savings Plan What do you think?

Research into the uptake of bowel cancer screening in County Durham

Smoking cessation in pregnancy guideline for practice (GL917)

Unconscious Gender Bias in Academia: from PhD Students to Professors

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Emotional changes in pregnancy and after childbirth. Issued by the Maternity Department

Cancer Awareness & Early Diagnosis Project Examples. Location: Camden (intervention area) and Kensington & Chelsea (control area), London

D Anderson, A Graham, A Mairs, T Owen, C McMullan Public Health Agency

Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research

Don t delay Immunise for. Whooping Cough. Immunisation is FREE. weeks months. months

Self-directed support

Options in HIV Prevention A Participant-Centered Counseling Approach

Vaccines Work Version

Staff Flu Campaign Evaluation Tool

handouts for women 1. Self-test for depression symptoms in pregnancy and postpartum Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (epds) 2

You re listening to an audio module from BMJ Learning. Hallo. I'm Anna Sayburn, Senior Editor with the BMJ Group s Consumer Health Team.

An Evaluation of the Sonas Freedom Programme September- December January 2012 Researcher: Paula McGovern

Young Women s Perceptions of Contraception and Pregnancy in South Africa: Implications for HIV Prevention

The hexavalent DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB combination vaccine

Chapter 1. Dysfunctional Behavioral Cycles

UWE Bristol. Patient / carer feedback for Adult Branch Nursing Students in practice

Emma Glendinning Operational Lead for Wiltshire. Tori Joel NSPCC Implementation Manager

Whooping cough. If you are pregnant you should get vaccinated to protect your baby

Adult Immunization: CDC Communication Efforts and the Consumer Perspective

Joint Mental Health Commissioning Strategy for Adults

Self Harm and Suicide Alertness for professionals working children & young people three month followup. June 2017 October 2017

Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Research Study

Welcome to Progress in Community Health Partnerships latest episode our Beyond the Manuscript podcast. In each

Draft 0-25 special educational needs (SEN) Code of Practice: young disabled people s views

APPENDIX 26: RESULTS OF SURVEY OF ANTENATAL AND POSTNATAL MENTAL HEALTH PRIMARY CARE SERVICES IN ENGLAND AND WALES

Diabetes in Pregnancy Network: Scoping survey March 2013

Dementia Across Cultures Conference

Our plan for making the lives of people with autism and their families and carers better

Community wellbeing Voice of the User report: Summary for stakeholders

HPV vaccine acceptance in male adolescents

How you can help support the Beat Flu campaign

Guideline scope Smoking cessation interventions and services

Podcast Interview Transcript

Couples Information Leaflet

Solihull Safeguarding Adults Board & Sub-committees

Recovering from a difficult birth.

Efficacy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa eradication regimens in bronchiectasis

What needs to happen in England

Inequalities in Infant Mortality: perpetuated through policy and practice?

Improving access to health care increasing social inclusion

University of Birmingham and University of York Health Economics Consortium (NCCID) Development feedback report on piloted indicators

Health Care Callback Survey Topline August 2001

Patients experiences and perceptions on support to self-manage their long-term condition

Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors of New Mothers During the H1N1 Flu Season

Strengthening user involvement in Northern Ireland: a summary and

Working with a Primary Care Trust (PCT) Caroline Hulett Health Promotion & Information Manager

Leveraging spousal communication as a gateway behavior in the context of an integrated health project in Mali. Danielle Naugle April 17, 2018

Pain Management Pathway Redesign. Briefing on Patient Journey Mapping approach to patient interviews

The Super EDEN Programme A case study illustrating the impact of service user and carer involvement

Harm Reduction in a Clinical Encounter: Collecting substance use history in a non-judgmental manner

GP Information Sheet

Equality Scheme. Our plan about how we are going to treat people fairly and make things better for staff and people who use our services


POsitive mental health for young people. What you need to know about Children and Adolescent s Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in Buckinghamshire

The. What-if? Workbook. How to Make Decisions About Your Mental Health Treatment. Ahead of Time. w i t h a d va n c e d i r e c t i v e s

Safeguarding adults: mediation and family group conferences: Information for people who use services

NORTHERN IRELAND LIFE AND TIMES SURVEY: AUTISM MODULE

Recovering from a difficult birth

About the Ageing Better programme

Next Steps Evaluation Report Executive Summary

Service Specification: Bristol and South Gloucestershire Specialist Substance Misuse Treatment Service January 2016

ADHD clinic for adults Feedback on services for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Making the most of an appointment

Understanding conscientious objection to abortion in Zambia

Perinatal Community Mental Health Team Patient Information Leaflet

IAPT for SMI: Findings from the evaluation of service user experiences. Julie Billsborough & Lisa Couperthwaite, Researchers at the McPin Foundation

A view from the ground what have we learned? Joanne Yarwood National Programme Manager Public Health England 1 st February 2017

Learning disabilities and Cancer screening. North Yorkshire taskforce group. Dr Jenni Lawrence NHS Scarborough and Ryedale CCG

Coping with a difficult birth experience and where to get help

Self Esteem and Purchasing Behavior Part Two.

Information for women who have experienced domestic abuse

A study of Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs SANAD-II

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening Things you need to know

Participant Information Sheet

Reducing differences in the uptake of immunisation (PH21): Frequently asked questions for staff in Sure Start Children s Centres

Safeguarding Business Plan

Enter and View Visit Report

The Bad News and the Good News: Sexual Abuse, Sexual Education, and Positive Sexuality

Good enough? Breast cancer in the UK

Co-Production Agreement for Health and Social Care in Hackney and the City of London

Berkshire School Aged Immunisation Team Seasonal Influenza 2018/19

Modern American Virgin: Stories of women s reproductive lives in Rural Communities

Flex case study. Pádraig MacGinty Owner, North West Hearing Clinic Donegal, Ireland

Screening for hepatitis B, HIV and syphilis. An easy guide to screening tests when you are pregnant

WHY DO WE NEED TO ENGAGE WITH OUR COMMUNITIES?

Evidence statements from reviews 1 and 2

Whooping. pregnancy. Your questions answered on how to help protect your baby. the safest way to protect yourself and your baby

How you can help support the Beat Flu campaign

Transcription:

Barriers and facilitators to vaccination in pregnancy: a qualitative study in Northern Ireland, 2017 Maisa, A., Milligan, S., Boulter, D., Johnston, J., Treanor, C., & Bradley, D. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to vaccination in pregnancy: a qualitative study in Northern Ireland, 2017. Abstract from PHE Public Health Research and Science Conference 2018, Warwick, United Kingdom. Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2018 The Authors. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact openaccess@qub.ac.uk. Download date:09. Mar. 2019

Barriers to and facilitators of vaccination in pregnancy: a qualitative study in Northern Ireland, 2017 Anna Maisa (1,2), S Milligan (2), A Quinn (2), D Boulter (2), J Johnston (2), C Treanor (3), DT Bradley (2) 1. European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden 2. Public Health Agency, Health Protection Service, Belfast, Northern Ireland 3. Centre for Public Health, Queen s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland 1

Background Influenza during pregnancy may result in serious complications for the mother and baby Increase in pertussis infections in infants in the UK in 2011/2012 Vaccine uptake in pregnancy in Northern Ireland in 2015: 59% for influenza 63% for pertussis 2

Aim and objectives Our aim was to investigate the reasons for receiving or not receiving vaccination during pregnancy using a qualitative approach in order to describe the knowledge and investigate the attitudes and beliefs of pregnant women about vaccination in pregnancy describe possible practical barriers of pregnant women getting vaccinated identify ways to overcome barriers identified and to increase vaccine uptake in pregnancy 3

Methods Developed discussion guide, consent form and participant information sheet within multidisciplinary group & service users Commissioned a market research company to recruit participants and facilitate focus groups and in-depth interviews Sampling: Opportunistic on-street recruitment of pregnant women Including adult females, >16 weeks pregnant, vaccinated or not vaccinated and resident in Northern Ireland Migrant background for in-depth interview Excluding acquainted persons, participants of focus groups in the past 12 months 4

Methods Phenomenological thematic analysis by two researchers independently via a six-step process using qualitative analysis software Inductive coding of transcripts and comparison for agreement Discussion to agree on key themes derived from the data and allocating codes Applying COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative studies (COREQ): 32-item checklist covering research team and reflexivity, study design, analysis and findings 5

Results Data collected from 16 participants in three focus groups and one in-depth interview Mixture of age groups, number of children and social grade Participants (n) Vaccinated against influenza and/or pertussis Focus group 1 6 5 Yes / 1 No Focus group 2 7 No Focus group 3 2 Yes Interview 1 1 Yes 6

Results Identified Themes: Information and knowledge Influence of others Acceptance and trust Fear and distrust Responsibility for the baby Accessing vaccinations 7

Information and knowledge Various sources of information (doctors, midwifes, family, internet ) Active research and comparison of information Face-to-face discussions preferred Vaccinated were not necessarily more knowledgeable Speak to us more instead of just giving you a leaflet, because no matter who you see, be it a doctor or a midwife, it s flooded with leaflets, they are rushed to get you in and out that door as quickly as possible. [P2-FG3, vaccinated] 8

Influence of others Strong influence of midwives Many would get vaccinated if recommended by healthcare professionals, my midwives weren t pushy or anything towards it. They were quite laid back about it all, and I think that s what made me laid back about it all. It s like it s something not compulsory, it s up to me to have it. No one was forcing me to make the appointments to have it,. So I didn t think that it was very important, that it was a big deal to go and do it. [P1-FG2, unvaccinated] 9

Acceptance and trust Passive acceptance of vaccines Trust in healthcare professionals Lack of continuity of care ignorance is bliss Sure the baby gets vaccinated anyway. So if you are going to have your child vaccinated does it matter if it s during pregnancy or not? If it is that big of a risk, then they wouldn t offer it you. [P7-FG2, unvaccinated] 10

Fear and distrust Fear of pain and early side effects (vaccinated participants) Concern about unknown longer-term consequences of the vaccine (unvaccinated participants) Nature is best Anti-vaccination views I think I am inclined that if I definitely had to have a vaccination, then I wouldn t take it during pregnancy. The chances of the baby being infected by the things in there, the levels of mercury and aluminium, if that s ingested and the baby is going through a key development early on, it can affect their kidneys, liver, organs. [P5-FG2, unvaccinated] 11

Responsibility for the baby Being protective More important to vaccinate the baby than themselves Unvaccinated participants were concerned about protecting the baby from a vaccine they considered to be potentially harmful That s why I went for it, because I had listened to so much information, and my gut was telling me so. Because of the baby inside me, I couldn t take the risk of anything happening and then me blaming myself, And I didn t really want to know anything else about it, because too much information was going to confuse me. [P3-FG1, vaccinated] 12

Accessing vaccination Most experienced no difficulties accessing vaccination Vaccination has not been offered Appointment has not been booked Inconvenience of attending GP for vaccination Lack of time, time off work, difficulty accessing childcare, responsibility of organising appointments Like with me, I am just really lazy with these kinds of things. Like people say that you need to put an appointment on, but they don t push you,. Like, I never really got round to making it the first time, so what difference does it make this time? [P3-FG2, unvaccinated] 13

Discussion Barriers Own responsibility to book appointment Inconvenient to attend GP Lack of time Time off work Access to childcare Concerns about side effects of vaccines Facilitators Offer vaccination and appointments Checklist and reminders Emphasise recommendation Explain and discuss vaccination Vital influential role of healthcare professionals Involve midwives Strategies to develop interventions should address some of these barriers to meet the needs of pregnant women 14

Limitations Small study size due to limited funding and timescales Participants from a small geographical area around Belfast Inclusion of an unvaccinated participant in one of the vaccinated groups might have influenced other participants We cannot be confident that data saturation was reached with respect to the views of immigrant women as only one woman was interviewed 15

Conclusion Our study highlights: the critical role of healthcare professionals, especially midwives, in recommending vaccination in pregnancy the willingness of many unvaccinated women to be vaccinated the need for a better approach to vaccination reminders, appointments and delivery As a result of this study, we are exploring new approaches to vaccines being delivered by midwives in routine antenatal care appointments We are conducting a quantitative study of the factors associated with vaccination in pregnancy 16

Sources of funding Supported by the Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and Health Protection divisions of the Public Health Agency Ethical approval Research ethics approval was obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority, West Midlands - Coventry & Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee (REC reference number 17/WM/0076) through its proportionate review process. Conflicts of Interest None 17