IMRT QUESTIONNAIRE. Address: Physicist: Research Associate: Dosimetrist: Responsible Radiation Oncologist(s)

Similar documents
Advanced Technology Consortium (ATC) Credentialing Procedures for 3D Conformal Therapy Protocols 3D CRT Benchmark*

IROC Liver Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Liver Phantom. Revised July 2015

Lung Spine Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Spine Phantom. MARCH 2014

The RPC s Evaluation of Advanced Technologies. AAPM Refresher Course July 29, 2008 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

RPC Liver Phantom Highly Conformal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

QA for Clinical Dosimetry with Emphasis on Clinical Trials

IROC Prostate Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Treating the IROC IMRT Prostate Phantom. Revised March 2014

What Can Go Wrong in Radiation Treatment: Data from the RPC. Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

Prostate Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Treating the IMRT Prostate Phantom. Revised March 2014

Assessing Heterogeneity Correction Algorithms Using the Radiological Physics Center Anthropomorphic Thorax Phantom

IROC Head and Neck Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC IMRT Phantom. Revised MARCH 2014

RPC s Credentialing Programs for Clinical Trials

IROC Lung Phantom 3D CRT / IMRT. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Lung Phantom. Revised Dec 2015

Data Collected During Audits for Clinical Trials. July 21, 2010 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Aspects & Commissioning Strategies

EORTC Member Facility Questionnaire

An anthropomorphic head phantom with a BANG polymer gel insert for dosimetric evaluation of IMRT treatment delivery

Quality assurance and credentialing requirements for sites using inverse planned IMRT Techniques

IROC Head and Neck Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC IMRT Phantom. Revised April 2014

Introduction of RapidArc TM : an example of commissioning and implementing a QA programme for a new technology

The Accuracy of 3-D Inhomogeneity Photon Algorithms in Commercial Treatment Planning Systems using a Heterogeneous Lung Phantom

Verification of treatment planning system parameters in tomotherapy using EBT Radiochromic Film

Measurement Guided Dose Reconstruction (MGDR) Transitioning VMAT QA from phantom to patient geometry

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for treatment of post-operative high grade glioma in the right parietal region of brain

Limits of Precision and Accuracy of Radiation Delivery Systems

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSORTIUM (ATC) CREDENTIALING PROCEDURES FOR LUNG BRACHYTHERAPY IMPLANT PROTOCOLS

RTOG DOSIMETRY DATA SUBMISSION

Leila E. A. Nichol Royal Surrey County Hospital

A VMAT PLANNING SOLUTION FOR NECK CANCER PATIENTS USING THE PINNACLE 3 PLANNING SYSTEM *

Implementing New Technologies for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Quality assurance in external radiotherapy

Future upcoming technologies and what audit needs to address

Accuracy Requirements and Uncertainty Considerations in Radiation Therapy

Reference Photon Dosimetry Data for the Siemens Primus Linear Accelerator: Preliminary Results for Depth Dose and Output Factor

Dosimetric study of 2D ion chamber array matrix for the modern radiotherapy treatment verification

Film-based dose validation of Monte Carlo algorithm for Cyberknife system with a CIRS thorax phantom

doi: /j.ijrobp

Quality Assurance of Helical Tomotherapy Machines

RADIATION ONCOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAM Competency Evaluation of Resident

Amendment No. 2. Item No. 2 (Rfx/ Event number )

Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: GRID Sponsored by.decimal Friday, August 22, Pamela Myers, Ph.D.

SBRT fundamentals. Outline 8/2/2012. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Educational Session

NIA MAGELLAN HEALTH RADIATION ONCOLOGY CODING STANDARD. Dosimetry Planning

Introduction. Measurement of Secondary Radiation for Electron and Proton Accelerators. Introduction - Photons. Introduction - Neutrons.

Transition to Heterogeneity Corrections. Why have accurate dose algorithms?

Additional Questions for Review 2D & 3D

Treatment Planning Evaluation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI)

Disclosure. Outline. Machine Overview. I have received honoraria from Accuray in the past. I have had travel expenses paid by Accuray in the past.

A Comparison of IMRT and VMAT Technique for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer

Credentialing for the Use of IGRT in Clinical Trials

Normal tissue doses from MV image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using orthogonal MV and MV-CBCT

Activity report from JCOG physics group

ph fax

Unrivaled, End-to-End

Measurement of Dose to Implanted Cardiac Devices in Radiotherapy Patients

Clinical Trial Credentialing:

Level of Accuracy Practically Achievable in Radiation Therapy. David Followill and RPC staff August 6, 2013

Verification of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques

EVALUATION OF INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY (IMRT) DELIVERY ERROR DUE TO IMRT TREATMENT PLAN COMPLEXITY AND IMPROPERLY MATCHED DOSIMETRY DATA

Hybrid VMAT/IMRT Approach to Traditional Cranio-Spinal Irradiation (CSI): A Case Study on Planning Techniques and Delivery

SBRT Credentialing: Understanding the Process from Inquiry to Approval

Catharine Clark NPL, Royal Surrey County Hospital and RTTQA

Can we hit the target? Can we put the dose where we want it? Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Completion of Treatment Planning. Eugene Lief, Ph.D. Christ Hospital Jersey City, New Jersey USA

Dosimetric verification and quality assurance of runningstart-stop (RSS) delivery in tomotherapy

Topics covered 7/21/2014. Radiation Dosimetry for Proton Therapy

Silvia Pella, PhD, DABR Brian Doozan, MS South Florida Radiation Oncology Florida Atlantic University Advanced Radiation Physics Boca Raton, Florida

Reena Phurailatpam. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy of Medulloblastoma using Helical TomoTherapy: Initial Experience from planning to delivery

TLD as a tool for remote verification of output for radiotherapy beams: 25 years of experience

Calibration of dosimeters for small mega voltage photon fields at ARPANSA

Quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy using Elekta Synergy

Evaluation of Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques in High-Grade Gliomas

Technical Study. Institution University of Texas Health San Antonio. Location San Antonio, Texas. Medical Staff. Daniel Saenz. Niko Papanikolaou.

M. J. Maryanski, Three Dimensional BANG Polymer Gel Dosimeters AAPM'99, CE Course

Small field diode dosimetry

MVCT Image. Robert Staton, PhD DABR. MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando. ACMP Annual Meeting 2011

IMRT Implementation And Patient Specific Dose Verification With Film And Ion Chamber Array Detectors

Intensity modulation techniques for spinal treatments and on-line VolumeView TM guidance

A model for assessing VMAT pre-treatment verification systems and VMAT optimization algorithms

International Practice Accreditation

Defining Target Volumes and Organs at Risk: a common language

SUPERIORITY OF A REAL TIME PLANNING TECHNIQUE OVER IMAGE GUIDED RADIATION THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY PROSTATE CANCERS

3D Conformal Radiation Therapy for Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast

Dosisverifikation mit Delta 4 Discover während der Behandlung

Heterogeneity Corrections in Clinical Trials

7/10/2015. Acknowledgments. Institution-specific TG-142? AAPM:Task Group-142. Failure-Mode & Effects Analysis

Are Transmission Detectors a Necessary Tool for a Safe Patient Radiation Therapy Program?

Expectations of Physics Knowledge for Certification

CURRICULUM OUTLINE FOR TRANSITIONING FROM 2-D RT TO 3-D CRT AND IMRT

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Patient Specific QA

8/3/2016. The EPID Strikes Back! - EPID In-Vivo Dosimetry. EPID Research Number of Publications. Why EPID in-vivo? Detectable errors: patient

THE TRANSITION FROM 2D TO 3D AND TO IMRT - RATIONALE AND CRITICAL ELEMENTS

Independent Dose Verification for IMRT Using Monte Carlo. C-M M Charlie Ma, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology FCCC, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA

Evaluation of Dosimetry Check software for IMRT patient-specific quality assurance

Linac or Non-Linac Demystifying And Decoding The Physics Of SBRT/SABR

Evaluation of Monaco treatment planning system for hypofractionated stereotactic volumetric arc radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases

Small field dosimetry, an example of what a Medical Physicist does (& some more examples) A/PROF SCOTT CROWE MEDICAL PHYSICIST

IMRT Planning Basics AAMD Student Webinar

Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification

IMRT QA: Point Dose Measurements or 2D Array?

Transcription:

IMRT QUESTIONNAIRE Institution: Date: / / Address: Physicist: e-mail: Telephone: Fax: Research Associate: email: Telephone: Fax: Dosimetrist: email: Telephone: Fax: Responsible Radiation Oncologist(s) Telephone: e-mail: This questionnaire and benchmark have been accepted by all of the NCI funded cooperative groups and Quality Assurance Offices as a minimum standard for an institution to be credentialed for use of IMRT in clinical trials. The benchmark is not site specific, i.e. it applies to IMRT treatment of all disease sites. The benchmark should be submitted to the appropriate Quality Assurance office, i.e. Quality Assurance Review Center (www.qarc.org ), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (www.rtog.org), or Radiological Physics Center (http://rpc.mdanderson.org/rpc ). Some cooperative groups may require that a specially designed phantom be planned and irradiated using IMRT as a part of the IMRT credentialing requirement for some or all of their IMRT protocols. For such cases the RPC has developed anthropomorphic (or geometric) phantoms to meet the specific requirements of the protocol. Institutions that have satisfactorily completed IMRT credentialing with an RPC phantom will not be required to complete this benchmark. Information concerning the RPC phantoms may be obtained from the RPC. 1

1. a. What treatment machine(s) do you use for IMRT treatments? b. Photon energy(s)? 2 a. What form of IMRT do you use? SMLC (step and shoot) DMLC (sliding window) Serial tomotherapy (MIMiC) other b. MLC/device used to deliver IMRT: vendor (#) leaves with cm leaf width at isocenter Nomos MIMiC in 1cm mode 2cm mode Other : 3. What is your IMRT planning system? Version No. 4. Is your treatment planning system capable of transferring a patient s beams to a QA phantom for verification purposes? yes no If no, how do you verify the dose distribution 5. What sites do you treat with IMRT? head and neck prostate other (please specify) 6. If you treat head and neck (H&N) patients with IMRT: a. The total number of H&N patients treated with IMRT at your institution is b. Number of H&N patients treated with IMRT in the past 12 months at your institution c. The usual fraction size is cgy and the usual number of fractions is d. The usual beam energy is MV e. How are your H&N patients immobilized for IMRT? head-cup and mask foam-immobilization mold and mask talon other A bite block is routinely used yes no f. What PTV margins do you usually use for H&N IMRT patients? mm 2

g. To what isodose line are IMRT treatments for H&N patients commonly prescribed (relative to maximum dose)? 95% 90% 85% 80% other h. How do you verify field positioning relative to the patient s anatomy? orthogonal films beam films using a jaw setting that encloses all segments other (please be specific) i. How frequently is position verification performed for H&N patients? first treatment only weekly other j. How do you verify that the field intensity patterns are delivered as planned? 7. If you treat prostate patients with IMRT: a. The total number of prostate patients treated with IMRT at your institution is b. Number of prostate patients treated with IMRT at your institution in past 12 months is c. The usual fraction size is cgy and the usual number of fractions is d. The usual beam energy is MV e. How are your prostate patients immobilized for IMRT? knee sponge only thermoplastic cast knee sponge and foot holder foam-immobilization mold other f. What PTV margins do you usually use for prostate patients? mm g. To what isodose line are IMRT treatments for prostate patients commonly prescribed (relative to maximum dose)? 95% 90% 85% 80% other h. How do you verify field positioning relative to the patient s anatomy? orthogonal films beam films using a jaw setting that encloses all segments other (please be specific) 3

i. How frequently is position verification performed for prostate patients? first treatment only weekly other j. How do you verify that the field intensity patterns are delivered as planned? 8. Other than prostate or H&N, what site do you most commonly treat with IMRT? a. The total number of patients treated to this site with IMRT at your institution is b. The number of these patients treated with IMRT at your institution in past 12 months is c. The usual fraction size is cgy and the usual number of fractions is d. The usual beam energy is MV e. How are patients immobilized for these treatments? f. What PTV margins do you usually use for this site? mm g. To what isodose line are IMRT treatments for these patients commonly prescribed (relative to maximum dose)? 95% 90% 85% 80% other h. How do you verify field positioning relative to the patient s anatomy? orthogonal films beam films using a jaw setting that encloses all segments other (please be specific) i. How frequently is position verification performed for these patients? first treatment only weekly other j. How do you verify that the field intensity patterns are delivered as planned? 4

9. How do you verify that the treatment unit delivers the planned dose for individual patients? a. Absolute dose point(s) measurement with ion chamber (chamber size cc ) diode TLD XV film EDR2 film radiochromic film Other: These absolute dose measurements are routinely performed for every field for every patient cumulative fields (i.e. total treatment) for every patient monthly as part of routine Quality Assurance only on special occasions specify: b. Relative dose isodose distribution with XV film EDR2 film radiochromic film Gel dosimetry other Relative dose is routinely measured in (#) axial planes & in (#) sagital planes & in (#)coronal planes These relative dose measurements are routinely performed for every field for every patient cumulative fields (i.e. total treatment) for every patient monthly as part of routine Quality Assurance only on special occasions specify: 5

c. Type of QA phantom: anthropomorphic phantom Vendor: geometric phantom: (material) shape: square cylinder other size of phantom cm X cm X cm d. For this measurement the patient s beams are transferred to the QA phantom by the planning system. the patient s beams are not transferred to the QA phantom in software, but an anthropomorphic phantom is used to simulate approximate patient geometry for dose measurements. e. The fields are delivered to the QA phantom and measured for individual fields delivered in the geometry of the treatment for cumulative fields (i.e. total treatment) delivered in the geometry of the treatment for individual fields delivered from one gantry angle (e.g. 0 or 180 degrees) for cumulative fields (i.e. total treatment) delivered from one gantry angle (e.g. 0 or 180 degrees) f. What agreement between planned and measured doses for individual patients is considered acceptable at your institution? For absolute dose in target volume (high dose) region For absolute dose in critical normal tissue region For absolute dose in low dose region For relative dose in high dose gradient region For relative dose in low dose gradient region in high dose region (target) in low dose region g, Are your monitor unit calculations checked by an independent program? no yes Vendor: 6

10. Are your IMRT treatments monitored by a record and verify system? no yes What system? 11. Treatment Machine Calibration a. Calibration Protocol: TG-21 TG-51 Other: Frequency of calibration checks: b. RTOG institutions and institutions choosing to satisfy the benchmark requirement with an RPC phantom should submit the following items for all treatment machines/photon energies used for IMRT: 1. A description of the procedures followed to verify the calibration of the treatment machine. 2. Calibration report worksheet (TG-21/TG-51 or equivalent). 3. Central axis depth dose information: table of TPR s, TMR s, TAR s, or percentage depth dose and output data used for clinical meter set calculations. 7