Mechanical Thrombectomy: Where Are We Now? T. Adam Oliver, MD Tallahassee Neurological Clinic Tallahassee, Florida TMH Neurosymposium June 11, 2016

Similar documents
Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

UPDATES IN INTRACRANIAL INTERVENTION Jordan Taylor DO Metro Health Neurology 2015

Mechanical thrombectomy in Plymouth. Will Adams. Will Adams

Figures for Draft Response to IMS III, MR RESCUE, and SYNTHSESIS Trials

Broadening the Stroke Window in Light of the DAWN Trial

Mechanical Thrombectomy of Large Vessel Occlusions Using Stent Retriever Devices

Interventional Treatment of Stroke

Stroke Clinical Trials Update Transitioning to an Anatomic Diagnosis in Ischemic Stroke

Stroke Update Elaine J. Skalabrin MD Medical Director and Neurohospitalist Sacred Heart Medical Center Stroke Center

Endovascular Stroke Therapy

The DAWN of a New Era for Wake-up Stroke

5/31/2018. Interventional Therapies that Expand Time Windows for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment. Disclosures. Impact of clot burden

Update on Early Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions

Strokecenter Key lessons of MR CLEAN study

Mechanical thrombectomy beyond the 6 hours. Mahmoud Rayes, MD Medical Director, Stroke program Greenville Memorial Hospital

BGS Spring Conference 2015

Drano vs. MR CLEAN Review of New Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Interventional Stroke Treatment

Disclosure. Advances in Interventional Neurology. Disclosure. Natural History of Disease 3/15/2018. Vishal B. Jani MD

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Curtis A. Given II, MD Co-Director, Neurointerventional Services Baptist Physician Lexington

Neuro-vascular Intervention in Stroke. Will Adams Consultant Neuroradiologist Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

How to Interpret CT/CTA for Acute Stroke in the Age of Endovascular Clot Retrieval

RBWH ICU Journal Club February 2018 Adam Simpson

Endovascular Neurointervention in Cerebral Ischemia

Acute Stroke Treatment: Current Trends 2010

Endovascular Treatment Updates in Stroke Care

EVOLUTION IN SYSTEMS OF STROKE CARE RIDWAN LIN, MD, PHD STROKE & INTERVENTIONAL NEUROLOGY BROWARD HEALTH

Updates on Endovascular Therapy

ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE. Current Treatment Approaches for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Imaging Stroke: Is There a Stroke Equivalent of the ECG? Albert J. Yoo, MD Director of Acute Stroke Intervention Massachusetts General Hospital

Acute Stroke Identification and Treatment

Stroke Treatment Beyond Traditional Time Windows. Rishi Gupta, MD, MBA

Evidence for Mechanical ThrombectomyFor Acute Ischemic Stroke. Kenneth V Snyder MD PhD SUNY Buffalo, NY

Mechanical Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy

Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke

Stroke Cart Improves Efficiency in Acute Ischemic Stroke Intervention

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Considerations from Recent Randomized Trials

Parameter Optimized Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Disclosures. Current Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Overview. Focal brain ischemia. Nerissa U. Ko, MD, MAS Professor of Neurology May 8, 2015

ESCAPE Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times

ACUTE STROKE TREATMENT IN LARGE NIHSS PATIENTS. Justin Nolte, MD Assistant Profession Marshall University School of Medicine

Acute Stroke Treatment KPNC Stroke EXPRESS

Advances in Neuro-Endovascular Care for Acute Stroke

A DIRECT ASPIRATION FIRST PASS TECHNIQUE (ADAPT) IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE

Code Stroke Intervention: Endovascular Therapies for Stroke J. DIEGO LOZANO MD INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY

Endovascular stroke research after MRCLEAN. W. van Zwam

Patient selection for i.v. thrombolysis and thrombectomy

framework for flow Objectives Acute Stroke Treatment Collaterals in Acute Ischemic Stroke framework & basis for flow

Distal Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Method and Benefit. Hans Henkes, Wiebke Kurre Stuttgart, Germany

Acute Stroke Management What is State of the Art?

AHA/ASA Guideline. Downloaded from by on November 7, 2018

Interventional Neuroradiology. & Stroke INR PROCEDURES INR PROCEDURES. Dr Steve Chryssidis. 25-Sep-17. Interventional Neuroradiology

Endovascular Clot Retrieval. Teddy Wu Neurologist (and Stroke enthusiast) Christchurch Hospital

ACUTE STROKE INTERVENTION: THE ROLE OF THROMBECTOMY AND IA LYSIS

Better identification of patients who may benefit from therapy

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Reducing Door-to-puncture Time

Acute Ischemic Stroke Imaging. Ronald L. Wolf, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Radiology

Interventional Revolution in Treatment of Stroke

Pr Roman Sztajzel Service de Neurologie HUG

Endovascular Therapy: Beyond the Guidelines

1/19/2018. Endovascular Therapy for Stroke

ACUTE STROKE IMAGING

12/4/2017. Disclosures. Study organization. Stryker Medtronic Penumbra Viz Route 92. Data safety monitoring board Tudor G.

Lessons Learned from IMS III: Implications for the Future

Case 1 5/26/2017 ENDOVASCULAR MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE

Size Matters: Differentiating Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) and Small Vessel Occlusion (SVO) in Stroke

Significant Relationships

CVA Updates Karen Greenberg, DO, FACOEP. Director Neurologic Emergency Department Crozer Chester Medical Center

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL UDINE/ITALY A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE IN STROKE TREATMET WITH EMBOTRAP II. TECHNOLOGY BASE ON CLOT RESEARCH

CT Perfusion is Essential for Stroke Triage. Maarten Lansberg, MD PhD Associate Professor of Neurology Stanford University, Stanford Stroke Center

Where are we heading and where are the big challenges?

Historical. Medical Policy

Role of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in the updated stroke approach

Update on Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy. Seniorprofessur Neurologie UniversitätsKlinikum und Universität Heidelberg

Comparison of Five Major Recent Endovascular Treatment Trials

ORIGINAL RESEARCH. Gabriel A. Vidal, MD, 1,2 James M. Milburn, MD 3

Acute stroke update 2016 innovations in managing ischemic and hemorrhagic disease

Supplementary Online Content

WHY TIMELINESS MATTERS. W&M Wren Association Lecture Series

How to Manage LVO Stroke with Access Blocked by Cervical Carotid Occlusion

SEE IT. BELIEVE IT. THE CONFIDENCE OF CLARITY. Solitaire Platinum. Revascularization Device

Mechanical endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective multicenter study in Belgium

Solitaire FR Revascularization Device

Introduction of Innovation into an Activity-Based Funding System in Ontario Stroke Endovascular Treatment (EVT)

Basilar artery stenosis with bilateral cerebellar strokes on coumadin

Trial and Cost Effectiveness Evaluation of Intra arterial Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Advances in Acute stroke Management

New Stroke Interventions. Scott L. Zuckerman M.D. Vanderbilt Neurosurgery

Latest Advances in the Neurointerventional Treatment of Ischemic Stroke P A C I F I C N E U R O. O R G

Acute Management of Stroke due to Intracranial Steno-occlusion. Joon-Tae Kim, MD, PhD Department of Neurology Chonnam National University Hospital

Benjamin Fox, MD Medical Director: Neurointerventional Radiology (NIR) DRMC Medical Director: Neurosurgery & Neurovascular, Intermountain Healthcare

DISCLOSURES OBJECTIVES 11/18/2014. Stroke Network Update. None. Discuss

What Have We Learned: Selection for Endovascular Stroke Therapy

COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY OF INSTOR REPORTS

Establishing AIS Best Practice and Standards Through Evidence Based Medicine

Further Pragmatic Trials of Thrombectomy are Needed

MR RESCUE: Primary Results

Advanced Neuroimaging for Acute Stroke

Intra-arterial Stroke Therapy: 2018 Update

Acute brain vessel thrombectomie: when? Why? How?

Transcription:

Mechanical Thrombectomy: Where Are We Now? T. Adam Oliver, MD Tallahassee Neurological Clinic Tallahassee, Florida TMH Neurosymposium June 11, 2016

none DISCLOSURES

Where did we come from?

Spiotta, et al. JNIS 2014

Devices we started with Microcatheter and wire Microcatheter and IA tpa Balloons Alligator Snare

STROKE EVOLUTION

Penumbra Seperators STROKE EVOLUTION

Penumbra STROKE EVOLUTION Stent Retriever 1

Penumbra STROKE EVOLUTION Stent Retriever 1 Stent Retriever w/ Direct Aspiration SOLUMBRA

STROKE EVOLUTION

Stroke Therapy Evolution Trial Merci 2002-07 Penumbra 2007-09 SWIFT 2012 TREVO 2012 NASA NASA Balloon Guide Solumbra Humphri es, et al jnis 2014 STAR ADAPT FAST Patients 444 284 144/58 /88 354 149 108 202 100 Time Window 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours None 8 hours None sich 7.8-9.8% 7.2-11% 1.7% 7% 9.9% 12.2% 5% 1.5% 0 Mortality 90 days 31-44% 22-45% 18% 34% 30% 26% 29% 6.9% 20% mrs 2 90 days 28-35% 25-40% 37% 40% 42% 52% 44% 58% 40% TICI 2a-3 43-68% 82-100% 83% site 86.4% 87.5% 88% TICI 2b-3 75.9% 68% Core lab 72.5% 76% 88% 85% 95%

Stroke Therapy Evolution Trial Merci 2002-07 Penumbra 2007-09 SWIFT 2012 TREVO 2012 NASA NASA Balloon Guide Solumbra Humphri es, et al jnis 2014 STAR ADAPT FAST Patients 444 284 144/58 /88 354 149 108 202 100 Time Window 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours None 8 hours None sich 7.8-9.8% 7.2-11% 1.7% 7% 9.9% 12.2% 5% 1.5% 0 Mortality 90 days 31-44% 22-45% 18% 34% 30% 26% 29% 6.9% 20% mrs 2 90 days 28-35% 25-40% 37% 40% 42% 52% 44% 58% 40% TICI 2a-3 43-68% 82-100% 83% site 86.4% 87.5% 88% TICI 2b-3 75.9% 68% Core lab 72.5% 76% 88% 85% 95%

Stroke Therapy Evolution Trial Merci 2002-07 Penumbra 2007-09 SWIFT 2012 TREVO 2012 NASA NASA Balloon Guide Solumbra Humphri es, et al jnis 2014 STAR ADAPT FAST Patients 444 284 144/58 /88 354 149 108 202 100 Time Window 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours None 8 hours None sich 7.8-9.8% 7.2-11% 1.7% 7% 9.9% 12.2% 5% 1.5% 0 Mortality 90 days 31-44% 22-45% 18% 34% 30% 26% 29% 6.9% 20% mrs 2 90 days 28-35% 25-40% 37% 40% 42% 52% 44% 58% 40% TICI 2a-3 43-68% 82-100% 83% site 86.4% 87.5% 88% TICI 2b-3 75.9% 68% Core lab 72.5% 76% 88% 85% 95%

Stroke Therapy Evolution Trial Merci 2002-07 Penumbra 2007-09 SWIFT 2012 TREVO 2012 NASA NASA Balloon Guide Solumbra STAR ADAPT FAST Patients 444 284 56/58 90/88 354 149 108 202 100 Time Window 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours 8 hours None 8 hours None sich 7.8-9.8% 7.2-11% 1.7% 7% 9.9% 12.2% 5% 1.5% 0 Mortality 90 days 31-44% 22-45% 18% 34% 30% 26% 29% 6.9% 20% mrs 2 90 days 28-35% 25-40% 37% 40% 42% 52% 44% 58% 40% TICI 2a-3 TICI 2b-3 43-68% 82-100% 83% site 75.9% 68% 86.4% 87.5% 88% Core lab 72.5% 76% 88% 85% 95%

Lessons Learned (1985-2002)

Not all revascularization is the same!! TICI Grading Scale Most stroke trials utilize TICI 2a as success.. BUT We should hold ourselves to higher standard!

Final Infarct Volume

Spiotta et al. The golden hour of stroke intervention: effect of thrombectomy procedural time in acute ischemic stroke on outcome. JNIS 2014;6:511-516

MUSC experience 2009-2013 90.00 IMPROVED PROCEDURAL TIME TIME 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 85 TIME 30.00 52 20.00 10.00 0.00 Group P Group S Aspiration Penumbra Aspiration N-144 cases Stent Retriever w direct aspiration N=33 cases 34 ADAPT N=44 cases 20

Lessons Learned Modern devices (Stent-retrievers/Aspiration) are very good at recanalization Recanalization is a powerful predictor of good outcomes Not all revascularization is the same Final infarct volume (core infarct size) is a strong predictor of outcome Time is of the essence

While as all these advances were being made.. WE WERE STUCK IN OLD TRIALS

IMS III SYNTHESIS MR RESCUE

IMS III

IMS III SYNTHESIS

IMS III SYNTHESIS MR RESCUE

SIGNIFICANT LIMITATIONS

The studies did not evaluate patients with large vessel occlusions IMS III Less than half of patients were screened with CTA SYNTHESIS 30% of patients screened with CTA the demonstration of vessel occlusion was not a precondition for inclusion in our trial

Modern thrombectomy devices were not the primary means of revascularization IMS III > 75% treated with IA t-pa, EKOS or MERCI 17% treated with Penumbra Aspiration system or Solitaire SYNTHESIS 2/3 rds treated with IA t-pa 1/3 rd treated with Devices (Solitaire, Trevo, Merci, Penumbra) MR RESCUE 64 total IA patients >50% treated with MERCI <20% treated with modern devices

Poor rates of recanalization IMS III TICI 2-3 at conclusion (2b-3) ICA occlusion 65% (38%) M1 occlusion 81% (44%) M2 occlusion 70% (44%) Multiple M2 occlusion 77% (23%) MR RESCUE 27% TICI 2b or 3 SYNTHESIS Not Reported

Poor Patient selection IMS III Majority of patients imaged with Basic CT head >40% of IMS III patients had baseline ASPECTS 7 SYNTHESIS Only 30% of patients screened with CTA IV t-pa withheld from patients presenting 0-4.5 hrs MR RESCUE Favorable penumbral pattern was defined as a predicted infarct core of 90 ml or less Median core infarct size: 60 ml

In patients with baseline CTA occlusion present (pre-specified analysis) Endovascular confers a statistically significant benefit across the spectrum of mrs A. Demchuk, IMS III: Comparison of Outcomes between IV and IV/IA Treatment in Baseline CTA Confirmed ICA, M1, M2 and Basilar Occlusions, slide 20, Presented at ISC 2013, Honolulu Hawaii With CTA-confirmed occlusion at baseline, representative of current practice, IMS III has a statistically significant positive outcome for endovascular 35

MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke in the Netherlands) Objective To asses the effect of intra-arterial treatment on functional outcome after AIS caused by intracranial arterial occlusion, against a background of best medical management Inclusion Criteria Acute Ischemic Stroke Intracranial anterior circulation occlusion (CTA confirmed) IA treatment with 6 hrs from onset Age 18 NIHSS 2 (World Stroke Congress; Istanbul, Turkey October 2014)

MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke in the Netherlands) Results Statistically significant positive outcomes for stroke patients with LV anterior circulation occlusion with IA thrombectomy (33% vs. 19% mrs 2) Conclusion Intra-arterial treatment in patients with AIS caused by intracranial anterior circulation occlusion is effective and safe within 6 hours from stroke onset. (ISC, Nashville Feb. 2015)

Randomized Trial Status SWIFT PRIME, ESCAPE and EXTEND IA, have been stopped early due to overwhelming efficacy. All major stroke trials comparing catheter-based treatment to medical management have halted enrolling patients in the 0-6 hour window.

Strong emphasis on hospital workflow and intervention Door to CT Door to IV CT to Groin Stick Door to Revascularization

Lessons Learned Modern devices (Stentretrievers/ADAPT) are very good at recanalization MR CLEAN 97% stent retrievers ESCAPE 86% stent retrievers SWIFT PRIME 100% stent retrievers EXTEND-IA 100% stent retrievers

Lessons Learned Modern devices (Stent-retrievers/ADAPT) are very good at recanalization Recanalization is a powerful predictor of good outcomes MR CLEAN 58.7% TICI2B/3 ESCAPE 72.4% TICI 2B/3 SWIFT PRIME 88% TICI 2B/3 EXTEND-IA 86% TICI 2B/3

Lessons Learned Modern devices (Stent-retrievers/ADAPT) are very good at recanalization Recanalization is a powerful predictor of good outcomes Not all revascularization is the same Goal of recanalization was 2B/3 not > 2

Lessons Learned Final infarct volume (core infarct size) is a strong predictor of outcome Careful selection of patients utilizing ASPECTS and PERFUSION imaging ESCAPE Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times ASPECTS >5 EXTEND IA Extending the time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits Intra-Arterial selected with a dual target of vessel occlusion and evidence of salvageable tissue on perfusion imaging

Lessons Learned Time is of the essence ESCAPE CT Head to groin puncture CT Head to first recanalization 60 min 90 min EXTEND IA Onset to groin puncture within 6 hrs of stroke onset Completion of IAT within 8 hrs of stroke onset SWIFT PRIME Imaging to groin puncture Imaging to stent retriever 41-83 min 63-108 min

ESCAPE Scores on the Modified Rankin Scale at 90 Days in the Intention-to-Treat Population. Goyal M et al. N Engl J Med 2015. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905

ESCAPE Scores on the Modified Rankin Scale at 90 Days in the Intention-to-Treat Population. Good Outcome (mrs 0-2): 53% vs. 29%; OR 1.8 29% mrs 2 53% mrs 2 Goyal M et al. N Engl J Med 2015. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905

SWIFT PRIME

SWIFT PRIME 60.2% vs 35.5%

EXTEND IA

EXTEND IA 72% vs 39%

MR CLEAN ESCAPE EXTEND-IA SWIFT PRIME N Device Usage Enrollment Time Window 500 patients - 233 IAT - 267 Control Open Label - Mostly stent retrievers 316-165 IAT - 150 Control Open Label - 86% Stent Retrievers 70-35 IAT - 35 Control Only Solitaire (provided free by Covidien) 196-98 IAT - 98 Control Only Solitaire 6 hrs from symptom onset 12 hrs from symptom onset 4.5 hrs from symptom onset 6 hrs from sympton onset Key Selection Criteria - CTA confirmation LVO - CTA confirmation LVO - Mismatch with ischemic core < 70 ml on CTP - CTA confirmation LVO - ASPECTS 6 Baseline NIHSS - 17 IAT - 18 Control - 16 IAT - 17 Control - 17 IAT - 13 Control 17 both IAT and Control Median ASPECTS 9 both IAT and Control 9 both IAT and Control Not applicable 9 both IAT and Control mrs 2 @ 90 Days IAT: 32.6% Control: 19.1% IAT: 53% Control: 29.3% IAT: 71% Control: 40% IAT: 61.1% Control: 35.5% Revas Rate of IAT 58.7% TICI 2b/3 72.4% TICI 2b/3 86% TICI 2b/3 88% TICI 2b/3 Mortality at 90 Days IAT: 21% Control: 22% IAT: 10% Control: 19% IAT: 9% Control: 20% IAT: 12.2% Control: 25.8% sich IAT: 7.7% Control: 6.4% IAT: 3.6% Control: 2.7% IAT: 0% Control: 6% IAT: 1.0% Control: 3.1%

MR CLEAN ESCAPE EXTEND-IA SWIFT PRIME N Device Usage Enrollment Time Window 500 patients - 233 IAT - 267 Control Open Label - Mostly stent retrievers 316-165 IAT - 150 Control Open Label - 86% Stent Retrievers 70-35 IAT - 35 Control Only Solitaire (provided free by Covidien) 196-98 IAT - 98 Control Only Solitaire 6 hrs from symptom onset 12 hrs from symptom onset 4.5 hrs from symptom onset 6 hrs from sympton onset Key Selection Criteria - CTA confirmation LVO - CTA confirmation LVO - ASPECTS 6 - Moderate/Good Collaterals - CTA confirmation LVO - Mismatch with ischemic core < 70 ml on CTP - CTA confirmation LVO - ASPECTS 6 Baseline NIHSS - 17 IAT - 18 Control - 16 IAT - 17 Control - 17 IAT - 13 Control 17 both IAT and Control Median ASPECTS 9 both IAT and Control 9 both IAT and Control Not applicable 9 both IAT and Control mrs 2 @ 90 Days IAT: 32.6% Control: 19.1% IAT: 53% Control: 29.3% IAT: 71% Control: 40% IAT: 61.1% Control: 35.5% Revas Rate of IAT 58.7% TICI 2b/3 72.4% TICI 2b/3 86% TICI 2b/3 88% TICI 2b/3 Mortality at 90 Days IAT: 21% Control: 22% IAT: 10% Control: 19% IAT: 9% Control: 20% IAT: 12.2% Control: 25.8% sich IAT: 7.7% Control: 6.4% IAT: 3.6% Control: 2.7% IAT: 0% Control: 6% IAT: 1.0% Control: 3.1%

MR CLEAN ESCAPE EXTEND-IA SWIFT PRIME N Device Usage Enrollment Time Window 500 patients - 233 IAT - 267 Control Open Label - Mostly stent retrievers 316-165 IAT - 150 Control Open Label - 86% Stent Retrievers 70-35 IAT - 35 Control Only Solitaire (provided free by Covidien) 196-98 IAT - 98 Control Only Solitaire 6 hrs from symptom onset 12 hrs from symptom onset 4.5 hrs from symptom onset 6 hrs from sympton onset Key Selection Criteria - CTA confirmation LVO - CTA confirmation LVO - ASPECTS 6 - Moderate/Good Collaterals - CTA confirmation LVO - Mismatch with ischemic core < 70 ml on CTP - CTA confirmation LVO - ASPECTS 6 Baseline NIHSS - 17 IAT - 18 Control - 16 IAT - 17 Control - 17 IAT - 13 Control 17 both IAT and Control Median ASPECTS 9 both IAT and Control 9 both IAT and Control Not applicable 9 both IAT and Control mrs 2 @ 90 Days IAT: 32.6% Control: 19.1% IAT: 53% Control: 29.3% IAT: 72% Control: 40% IAT: 60.2% Control: 35.5% Revas Rate of IAT 58.7% TICI 2b/3 72.4% TICI 2b/3 86% TICI 2b/3 88% TICI 2b/3 Mortality at 90 Days IAT: 21% Control: 22% IAT: 10% Control: 19% IAT: 9% Control: 20% IAT: 12.2% Control: 25.8% sich IAT: 7.7% Control: 6.4% IAT: 3.6% Control: 2.7% IAT: 0% Control: 6% IAT: 1.0% Control: 3.1%

SW 77 yo female with acute onset right sided facial, UE and LE weakness. Time of onset ~4.5 hours. Brought to TMH by family, seen by neurology in ER PMHx: Afib, DM, HTN INR 2.1 Neuro exam: intubated, eyes open to stimulateion, plegic RUE, wiggles Right ties to command, FSC/antigravity Left side NIHSS 8

SW Not a tpa candidate because of INR Taken for CT Angiogram and CT Perfusion

Taken for mechanical thrombectomy within 40 minutes of arrival

Solitaire 2 4x40mm stentriever

One pass with Solitaire

Postop Awake, alert, fluent speech Full strength in all four extremities

Conclusion There is (Level 1) evidence that IA thrombectomy is beneficial for patients with AIS and LVO within 0-6 hrs.