DIMITRIJEVI] MIRJANA, TEODOROVI] V, BALTI] M and KARABASIL N. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Belgrade. (Received 12. November 2003) INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
APPLICATION OF LACTOCOCCIN BZ AND ENTEROCIN KP AGAINST LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES IN MILK AS BIOPRESERVATION AGENTS

Effect of Cold Temperature on Germicidal Efficacy of Quaternary Ammonium Compound, lodophor, and Chlorine on Listeria

Listeria monocytogenes in Food Plants with emphasis on Cold-Smoked Salmon Plants & Dairies. Presented by Rebecca Robertson January 19, 2009

MRA basic awareness course

FACTORS AFFECTING THE GROWTH OF MICRO-ORGANISMS IN FOODS

Use of Conductance to Detect Bacteriocin Activity

What is the impact of different factors on the exposure?

Quality of Meat Products Using Bioprotective Cultures"

C. B. Bottini and P. M. Muriana STORY IN BRIEF INTRODUCTION

Food safety: Avoiding listeria

USE AND APPLICATION OF NATURAL PRESERVATIVES

Opportunities to Collect Data and Improve Lm Risk Assessments

Food Contamination and Spoilage Food Safety: Managing with the HACCP System Second Edition (245TXT or 245CIN)

Listeria monocytogenes Risk Assessment: Executive Summary

Those Pathogens, What You Should Know

BadBugBook FoodbornePathogenicMicroorganismsandNaturalToxins

Lorraine McIntyre Food Safety Specialist. Fermented Food Safety BC Food Protection Association November 7, 2016

Salmonella Count Changes in Fermentation of Poultry Farm Waste

Food Safety Performance Standards: an Epidemiologic Perspective

Canadian Regulations and Guidelines for Listeria. Terry Peters Microbiology Program Specialist Canadian Food Inspection Agency

Enhanced antibacterial potential of ethanolic extracts of neem leaf (Azadiracta indica A. Juss.) upon combination with bacteriocin

Food Safety and Inspection Service: Food Safety and Inspection Service Click to edit Master title style

Elaboration of Multiannual sampling plan concerning microbiological hazards in food 16/06/2010

Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry , Índia. ABSTRACT

In-vitro analysis of the microbial-load in raw meat and finished products

Guidance on the safety and shelf-life of vacuum and modified atmosphere packed chilled foods. January 2004 (DRAFT)

Growth Suppression of Listeria monocytogenes by Lactates in Broth, Chicken, and Beef

PROBIOTIC STARTERS VERSUS TRADITIONAL STARTER IN QUARG PRODUCTION

Quantitative risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and milk products. O. Cerf & M. Sanaa Alfort Veterinary School

1st Quarter National Microbiological Survey 2003 (NS1): Microbiological quality/safety of pre-packed cooked sliced ham

Food Safety. Professor Christine Dodd Division of Food Sciences

The Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Meats

Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica in Growing Pigs in Iowa and North Carolina: A Pilot Study

On shelf life of foods

FOOD BORNE DISEASES Lectures

Natural Antimicrobials, Parasitic Bacteria and Bacteriophages

Biopreservation of Foods

Regulatory Update Jennifer McEntire. PMA & United Fresh Joint Listeria Workshop

I S I F O O D P R OT E C T I O N. Microorganisms in food: THE GOOD, THE BAD & THE UGLY 192,720,000,000,000

Introduction. Future U.S. initiatives regarding the food safety for fresh produce. FoodNet Partners. FoodNet Partners

Antibacterial activity and mechanism of ZnO nanoparticles on C. jejuni

namib la U n IVERS ITY OF SCIEnCE AnD TECHnOLOGY

Running head: SALMONELLA BACTERIA 1

Microbiological examination of salad served with takeaway meals

Institute of Food Research. Predicting bacterial growth in reduced salt foods

International 59th Meat Conference in Serbia Better food Better life

Charcuterie and Food Safety. Dr. Karen Killinger Washington State University

Food Safety Produce Rules How Preventive Controls work From Farm to Fork

Guidance for Reduced Oxygen Packaging

Food Microbiology 101

Synergy between Nisin and Select Lactates against Listeria monocytogenes Is Due to the Metal Cations

FORMULATING FOODS TO CONTROL BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

SCREENING LACTIC ACID BACTERIA FOR ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUND PRODUCTION K. KHALISANNI, K. LEE HUNG

Lairage is a hazard for Salmonella contamination in the pork chain

2012 Iowa FFA Food Science CDE Food Safety and Sanitation Section

Enhanced microbiological safety of acidified infant formulas tested in vitro

Escherichia coli Verotoxigenic Infections

Toxicity Test Pediocin N6 Powder Produced from Isolates Pediococcus pentosaceus Strain N6 on White Mice

Protein Quality of Fermented Beef by Lactobacillus plantarum 1B1

U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganisms and Natural Toxins Handbook

Food technologies to render and keep foods safe

meat hygiene B2B3D4278D15FC68390E03DC2D238E33 Meat Hygiene 1 / 6

Summary and Conclusion

Post-processing Technologies

Study on The Inhibition Effect of Nisin

USDA s New Shiga Toxin- Producing Escherichia coli Policy. James Hodges Executive Vice President American Meat Institute

Understanding the Public Health Significance of Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli. Betsy Booren, Ph.D. Director, Scientific Affairs

2013 Iowa FFA Food Science CDE Food Safety and Sanitation Section

-C 18. ACTA VET. BRNO 2011, 80: ; doi: /avb

Request for Report for Projects Awarded in 2013 and 2014 by. Mississippi Center for Food Safety and Post-Harvest Technology

FPP.01: Examine components of the food industry and historical development of food products and processing.

An Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 3a infections from butter in Finland

The role of the national & European reference laboratories

Using chloroform as a preservative for trivalent foot and mouth disease vaccine in comparison to thiomersal

Anti-listerial synergism of leaf essential oil of Metasequoia glyptostroboides with nisin in whole, low and skim milks

2. To determine the risk status of all meat processing plants in RSA.

Molecular Subtyping Methods for Listeria monocytogenes

1)Nitrite is added to meats specifically to inhibit growth of. 3) Which of the following statements about viruses is NOT correct?

Understanding the Public Health Significance of Salmonella. Betsy Booren, Ph.D. Director, Scientific Affairs

Acid stress induced persistence of Listeria monocytogenes and the differential expression of stress response genes in revived persister cell survivors

Survival of Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria in

SEROLOGICAL TYPES OF ESCHERICHIA COLI IN ASSOCIATION WITH

ا.م.د.هيفاء الحديثي. Enterobacteriaceae

A NOTE ON THE EFFECT OF CAPRYLIC ACID ON SHEDDING OF ESCHERICHIA COLI O103 AND O128 IN WEANED RABBITS

Top 8 Pathogens. Print this document and study these pathogens. You will be better prepared to challenge the ADVANCED.fst exam.

Update on infections with and clinical lab guidelines for Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) in the United States

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Parameters of Foods That Affect Microbial Growth

EXPERIMENT. Food Safety

Food Safety and Inspection Service ~~ Update ~~

Factors Affecting the Resistance of Staphylococcus

YUSO 2017 Disease Detectives Exam Booklet

AN OVERVIEW OF REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES IN READY-TO-EAT MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

Development and Characterization of an Antimicrobial Packaging Film Coating Containing Nisin for Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes

Research Article. The effects of hyaluronic acid on the morphological physiological differentiation of Lactobacillus

Regulatory requirements associated with the safe production of RTE products.

Antimicrobial effects of pine essential oil against Listeria monocytogenes

Antimicrobials in Meats

Case Study: What Went Wrong? Dr. Bob Whitaker, Produce Marketing Association

Control of Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods: Draft Guidance

Transcription:

Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), Vol. 54. No. 2-3, 201-208, 2004. UDK 619:579.62 DIFFERENT SENSITIVITY OF VARIOUS SEROTYPES OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES TO LACTIC ACID BACTERIA BACTERIOCINS DIMITRIJEVI] MIRJANA, TEODOROVI] V, BALTI] M and KARABASIL N Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Belgrade (Received 12. November 2003) In this study the sensitivity of various serotypes of Listeria monocytogenes towards five lactic bacteria bacteriocins was investigated, at two incubation temperatures (37 o C for 24 h and 4 o C for 12 days); six serotypes were indentified in 50 clinical/human isolates of L. monocytogenes and eight among 48 isolates from foodstuffs. This microorganism was found in many foodstuffs in numerous studies during the last decade. Among the methods for typing Listeria, the greatest attention has been dedicated to serological typing, which defines the basic characteristics of Listeria antigens. Namely, it is well known that bactericideal or bacteriostatic effects of bacteriocins are not only expressed towardse closely related bacterial species, but also towards less closely related Gram positive bacteria, such as L. monocytogenes. Bacteriocins can be eventually added to food, with the aim of decreasing the risk of listeriosis to the minimum. It was discovered that the bacteriocins, originating from Lactococcus UW and Lactobacillus sake 148 did not express inhibitory effects on any Listeria serotypes, while those bacteriocins originating from Lactobacillus sake 265, Pediococcus 347 and Lactobacillus sake 706 had a listericidal effect towards almost every assessed serotype. The highest bactericid effect was expressed by bacteriocin towards serotypes 4c and 4, at 37 o C after 24h incubation and towards serotypes 1/2b and 4b after 12 days incubation at 4 o C. Thus, the incubation temperature and time influenced the inhibitory effects of bacteriocins. Key words: inhibition zone, lactic acid bacteria bacteriocins, Listeria monocytogenes, serotyping INTRODUCTION Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), generally considered as food-grade organisms, show special promise for selection and implementation as protective cultures. Practical applications of protective cultures concern particular food commodities that either constitute novel systems with respect to packing and/or composition, or represent special hygienic risks. It was concluded that these bacteria offer an additional (and acceptable) processing parameter for improving the safety and assuring the quality of a given food. They achieve their protective

202 Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), Vol. 54. No. 2-3, 201-208, 2004. role by competition for food and/or by producing bacteriocins and other antimicrobial substances (Klaenhammer, 1993), which have bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects, usually towards closely related bacterial species (Jack et al., 1995). However, it was found that they may also have a destructive effect on some, not so closely related, Gram positive bacterial species, including L. monocytogenes (Muriana, 1996; Dimitrijevi}, 1998), the cause of listeriosis. Food of animal origin is often a carrier of the infection (Farber,1991; Farber and Peterkin, 1991; Dimitrijevi} and Teodorovi}, 1998). Great epidemics of listeriosis in humans have happened after consumption of food of plant origin, milk, dairy products, and meat and meat products (Bader, 1993). In France, after consumption of pork tongue in gelatin, an epidemic of listeriosis, encompassed 279 cases; 63 of which were lethal and 22 with miscarriage (WHO, 1993). The ubiquitous nature of Listeria monocytogenes makes total exclusion of the initial contamination in the foodstuff very unreal (Gahan, 1991). This emphasises the extraordinary importance of understanding factors which may reducte its numbers in foodstuffs (Crawford, 1989). Taking into account that L. monocytogenes is a cause of serious human disease, for which the minimal infective dose is not yet established, and its ubiquitous nature and wide spread distribution in foodstuffs, it would be very interesting to assess its sensitivity to lactic acid bacteria bacteriocins, which can eventually be added to food (Eckner, 1992;). When bacteriocin combinations were tested in a meat system, the results indicated that more than one LAB bacteriocin in combination may be effective in preventing the spontaneous emergence of a bacteriocinresistant Listeria population (Vignolo, 2000). For the purpose of identification of infection for epidemiologicalepizootological studies, among all the methods for typing of L. monocytogenes, greatest attention was dedicated to serological typing, which defines the basic characteristics of Listeria antigens. Many authors have developed reference methods for serotyping listeria, and have presented the basic characteristics of antigens that are present in Listeria spp. (Ralovich, 1984; Seeliger and Jones, 1986; Seeliger, 1987). There are 16 serotypes of L. monocytogenes and related species, defined by various combinations of somatic and flagellar antigens. Much research has focused on the problems of why most food borne listeriosis outbreaks have been caused by L. monocytogenes serovar 4b, rather than serovars ½ a and ½ b (McLauchlin, 1987; Rocourt, 1994), although the majority of L. monocytogenes isolates from foods belong to serogroup 1 (Autio et al., 1990; Ojeniyi et al., 1999.). The influece of lactic acid bacteria bacteriocins on growth of nine serotypes of L. monocytogenes was investigated in this work. MATERIALS AND METHODS A collection of 98 isolates of L. monocytogenes consisted of 50 clinical/human and 48 isolates from foodstuffs of animal origin. Clinical/human serotypes were isolated from blood, liquor, infected human feces (carriers or ill persons). Serotypes were isolated and identified from foodstuffs of animal origin by the McLain and Lee method (1989). L. monocytogenes was typed by slide

Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), Vol. 54. No. 2-3, 201-208, 2004. 203 agglutination with antiserum to serogroup 1 and 2 (Difco, MI, USA), and further sub-serotyping was performed in the Pasteur Institute in Paris (Institute Pasteur, Centre National de Reference des Listeria, Centre Collaborateur de 1 OMS pour la listeriose d origine alimentarie, Paris, France) by the methods of Jocelyne Rocourt. Bacteriocins originated from the following lactic acid bacteria: Lactobacillus sake 148, Lactococcus UW, Lactobacillus sake 265, Pediococcus 347 and Lactobacillus sake 706. Growth inhibition of the various serotypes of L.monocytogenes, under the influence of the selected bacteriocins, was assessed by the method of radial diffusion in agar. Each serotype was examined three times, so the statistical analysis was based on three values for every serotype, which reduces the effect of differences in agar thickness. Two incubation temperatures were used: 37 o C, for 24 hours and 4 o C for 12 days. For every serotype, three inhibition values were noted (expressed in millimeters), and they are presented as mean values in the tables. The statistical significance of differences in the obtained results between the experimental groups was determined by the random plan method using the statistical software pack, Statgraphics 5.0 (Statistical Graphic Corporation USA). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION All isolates of clinical/human origin were sorted in to six serotype groups, while the isolates from the foodstuffs belonged to eight serotype groups. The highest number of isolates, regardless of the origin, contained serotype 1/2a, while the other serotypes differed depending whether they were found in clinical/human or foodstuff isolates (Figure 1). It was documented that the bacteriocins, originating from Lactococcus UW and Lactobacillus sake 148 did Figure 1. Proportion of different serotypes of L. monocatogenes found in isolates from two sources.

204 Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), Vol. 54. No. 2-3, 201-208, 2004. not express inhibitory effects on any Listeria serotypes, while those bacteriocins originating from Lactobacillus sake 265, Pediococcus 347 and Lactobacillus sake 706 had a listericidal effect toward almost every assessed serotype. There have been many examinations of the sensitivity of L. monocytogenes serotypes to bacteriocins (Rasch and Knochel, 1998; Dimitrijevi}, 1999), but up to now sensitivity to bacteriocins could not be correlated with the MEE type (Larsen and Norrung, 1993), or serovar (Fereira and Lund, 1996; Rasch and Knochel, 1998; Dimitrijevic, 1999; Buncic et al., 2001) The sensitivity of our serotypes of L. monocytogenes towards some bacteriocins was assessed at 37 o C for 24h and during cooling at 4 o C for 12 days. It was found that the serotypes of L. monocytogenes were more or less sensitive to the examined bacteriocins regardless of their origin. Thus, during incubation at 37 o C for 24h, bacteriocins expressed the highest inhibitory effect towards serotypes 4c and 4 (Table 1). Table 1. Sensitivity of various serotypes of L.monocytogenes at 37 o C/24h to all bacteriocins of the examined lactic acid bacteria Serotype n X SD SY CV IV 1 180 2.00 1.69 0.13 84.50 0-6.5 1/2a 555 1.87 1.37 0.06 73.26 0-6.5 1/2b 150 2.28 1.47 0.12 64.47 0-5.5 1/2c 45 1.64 0.93 0.14 56.36 0-3.5 3a 15 2.10 0.93 0.24 44.28 1-4 3b 15 2.00 1.41 0.36 70.50 0-4 4 90 2.89 1.99 0.21 68.86 0-9 4b 405 2.09 1.36 0.07 65.07 0-6.5 4c 15 2.97 1.11 0.29 37.37 1.5-5 n... number of data SY... standard error X... average value (mm) CV... ceficient of variation SD... standard deviation IV... interval of variation It was found, using the Lsd test that there was a statistically very significant difference between the arithmetical mean values for serotypes 4c and 1/2c (p<0.01), regarding their sensitivity towards the assessed bacteriocins (Table 2). Statistically significant differences were also found at the same temperature (p<0.05) between mean of inhibition zones of serotypes 4c and 1/2a, as well as 4 and 1/2c and 4 and 1/2a. It is obvious that antigenic structure plays an important role in relation to the sensitivity of L. monocytogenes toward the bacteriocins of the lactic acid bacteria, during incubation at 37 o C for 24h. When the same serotypes were assessed in an identical manner during cooling at 4 o C for 12 days, the obtained values were almost double (Figure 2).

Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), Vol. 54. No. 2-3, 201-208, 2004. 205 Table 2. Statistical significance of differences in sensitivity to bacteriocins between various serotypes of L.monocytogenes grown at 37 o C for 24h Serotype X (mm) 1/2c 1/2a 3b 1 4b 3a 1/2b 4 4c 4 4c 2.97 1.33** 1.10* 0.97 0.97 0.88 0.87 0.69 0.08 - - 4 2.89 1.25* 1.02* 0.89 0.89 0.80 0.79 0.61 - - - 1/2b 2.28 0.64 0.41 0.28 0.28 0.19 0.18 - - - - 3a 2.10 0.46 0.23 0.10 0.10 0.01 - - - - - 4b 2.09 0.45 0.22 0.09 0.09 - - - - - - 1 2.00 0.36 0.13 0.00 - - - - - - - 3b 2.00 0.36 0.13 - - - - - - - - 1/2a 1.87 0.23 - - - - - - - - - 1/2c 1.64 - - - - - - - - - - ** p<0.01 (significance at 99%) * p<0.05 (significance at 95%) Figure 2. Sensitivity of L. monocytogenes serotypes to lactic acid bacteria bacteriocins at two incubation temperatures All the serotypes were more or less sensitive towards the tested bactericins, as in the previous case. The reactions of the L. monocytogenes isolates to the bacteriocins were variable within serovars, which corresponds to previous reports that different L. monocytogenes isolates do not behave uniformly when exposed to bacteriocins and significant strain diversity with respect to bacteriocin sensitivity exists (Ferreira and Lund, 1996; Rasch and Knochel,1998). Serotypes

206 Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), Vol. 54. No. 2-3, 201-208, 2004. 1/2b and 4b expressed the highest sensitivity, while the least sensitivity was shown by serotypes 1/2a, e.g. 1/2c. The Lsd test indicated statistically very significant differences (p<0.01) between all the serotypes in relation to serotype 1/2c, except for ½ a where the probability was p<0.05 (Table 3). Table 3. Statistical significance of differences in sensitivity to bacteriocins between various serotypes of L.monocytogenes grown at 4 o C for 12 days Serotype X 1/2c 1/2a 3a 3b 4 1 4c 4b 1/2b 4 1/2b 6.99 2.91** 1.86* 1.56** 1.52** 1.20* 1.01* 0.66 0.52 - - 4b 6.47 2.39** 1.34** 1.07* 1.00* 0.68 0.49 0.14 - - - 4c 6.33 2.25** 1.20* 0.90 0.86 0.54 0.35 - - - - 1 5.98 1.90** 0.85 0.55 0.51 0.19 - - - - - 4 5.79 1.71** 0.66 0.36 0.32 - - - - - - 3b 5.47 1.39** 0.34 0.04 - - - - - - - 3a 5.43 1.35** 0.30 - - - - - - - - 1/2a 5.13 1.05* - - - - - - - - - 1/2c 4.08 - - - - - - - - - - ** p<0.01 (significance at 99%) * p<0.05 (significance at 95%) Serotype 1/2b expressed statistically very significant differences in sensitivity from all serotypes except 4c and 4b. A statistically very significant difference in sensitivity was found for the serotype 4b (p<0.01) in relation to serotype 1/2a, as well as statistically significant differences (p<0.05) from serotypes 3a and 3b. Serotype 4c, beside the statistically very significant difference (p<0.01) in relation to serotype 1/2c, exhibited significant difference (p<0.05) from serotype 1/2a. According to these results, it can be concluded that the sensitivity of various isolates of L.monocytogenes is determined by their antigenic structure and they are generally more sensitive during cooling at 4 o C for 12 days, than at 37 o C. A possibility of application of suitable antilisteria factors (bactericins, temperature, and others) with the aim of preventing possible infections, could be predicted. Use of starter cultures with lactic acid bacteria (producing bacteriocins) in meat products, may benefit public health and decrease the risk of Listeria food poisoning (Campanini, 1993). Address for correspondence Mr Mirjana Dimitrijevi} Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 11 000 Belgrade Bul. JNA 18 Serbia & Montenegro

Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), Vol. 54. No. 2-3, 201-208, 2004. 207 REFERENCES 1. Autio T, Hielm S, Miettinen M, Sjoberg A-M, Aarnisalo K, Bjorkroth J, Mattila-Sandholm T, Korkeala H, 1999, Sources of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in a cold-smoked rainbow trout processing typing, Appl Environ Microbio, 65, 150-5. 2. Bader J, 1993, Listeriosis epidemic, Lancet, 342, 607. 3. Bun~i} S, 1991, The incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in slaughtered animals, in meat, and in meat products in Yugoslavia, Int J Food Microbiol, 12, 173-80. 4. Bun~i} S, Avery SM, Rocourt J, Dimitrijevic M, 2001, Can food-related environmental factors induce different behaviour in two key serovars, 4b and 1/2a, of Listeria monocytogenes?, Int J Food Microbiol, 65, 201-12. 5. Campanini M, Pedrazzoni I, Barbuti S, Baldini P, 1993, Behaviour of Listeria monocytogenes during the maturation of naturally and arteficially contaminated salami: effect of lactic-acid bacteria starter cultures, Int J Food Microbiol, 20,3, 169-75. 6. Crawford LM, 1989, Revised policy for controlling Listeria monocytogenes, Fed regist, 54, 22345-6. 7. Dimitrijevi} M, Teodorovi} V, Balti} M, Mirilovi} M, 1999, Variations in the sensitivity of Listeria monocytogenes types to lactic acid bacteria bacteriocins, Acta veterinaria, 49, 62-76. 8. Dimitrijevi} M, 1998, Ispitivanje varijacija izme u sojeva Listeria monocytogenes u pogledu osetljivosti prema bakteriocinima mle~nokiselinskih bakterija, Magistarska teza, Fakultet veterinarske medicine, Beograd. 9. Eckner KF, 1992, Bacteriocins and food applications, Dairy Food Environ Sanit, 12, 204-9. 10. Farber JM, Peterkin PI, 1991, Listeria monocytogenes, a foodborne pathogen. Microbiol Rev, 55, 476-511. 11. Ferreira MASS, Lund BM, 1996, Health risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in culture medium and long-life cottage cheese, Lett Appl Microbiol, 22, 433-8. 12. Gahan CGM, Collins JK, 1991, Listeriosis: biology and implications for the food industry, Trends Food Sci Technol, 2, 89-93. 13. Jack RW, Tagg JR, Ray B, 1995, Bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria, Microbiol. Rev, 59, 171-200. 14. Klaenhammer TR, 1993, Genetics of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria, FEMS Microbiol Rev, 12, 39-86. 15. Larsen AG, Norrung B, 1993, Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by bavaricin A, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus bavaricus MI401, Lett Appl Microbiol, 17, 132-4. 16. McClain D, Lee WH,1989, Isolation and identification of Listeria and identification of Listeria, FSIS Microbiol Div Lb Comm, No57. 17. McLauchin J, 1987, A review Listeria monocytogenes, recent advances in the taxonomy and epidemiology of listeriosis in humans, J Appl Bacteriol, 63, 1-11. 18. Muriana PM, 1996, Bacteriocins for control of Listeria spp. in food, J Food Protect, Supplement, 54, 54-63. 19. Rocourt J, 1994, Listeria monocytogenes: the state of the science, Dairy Food Environ San, 14, 70-82 20. Ralovich B, 1992, Diagnostic methods for Listeria strains, 11 th Int. Symp. Problems of Listeriosis, Copenhagen, 11-14 May, Book of Abstracts, 7, 17-8. 21. Rasch M, Knochel S, 1998, Variations in tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes to nisin, pediocin PA- 1 and bavaricin A, Lett Appl Microbiiol, 27, 275-8. 22. Ojeniyi B, Wegener H C, Jensen N E, Bisgaard M,1996, Listeria monocytogenes in poultry and poultry products: epidemiological investigations in seven Danish abattoirs, J Appl Bacteriol 80, 395-401. 23. Seeliger HPR, Jones D, 1986, Listeria, Bergeys Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol.2: 1235-1245. 24. Seeliger HPR, 1987, Classification and Pathogenicity of Listeria, Listeriosis, Joint WHO/Roi Consultation on Prevention and Control, Berlin (West), 10-12, December 1986, Vetmed Hefte 5/1987,56-9.

208 Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), Vol. 54. No. 2-3, 201-208, 2004. 25. Vignolo GM, Suriani F, Pesce de Ruiz Holgado A, Oliver G, 2000, Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dry fermented sausages, J Appl Bacteriol, 75,4, 344-9. 26. World Health Organization, 1993, Outbreak of listeriosis, Weekly Epidemiol. Rec, 68: 295. ZNA^AJ RAZLI^ITIH SEROTIPOVA LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES U POGLEDU OSETLJIVOSTI PREMA BAKTERIOCINIMA MLE^NOKISELINSKIH BAKTERIJA DIMITRIJEVI] MIRJANA, TEODOROVI] V, BALTI] M i KARABASIL N SADR@AJ U cilju identifikacije izvora infekcije u epidemiolo{ko-epizotoolo{kim istra`ivanjima, razvijene su brojne tehnike tipizacije Listerija u hrani. Od svih metoda tipizacije, najve}a pa`nja se posve}uje serolo{koj tipizaciji, kojom se defini{u osnovne karakteristike antigena Listerija. Poznato je baktericidno ili bakteriostatsko dejstvo bakteriocina ne samo prema srodnim bakterijskim vrstama, ve} i prema manje srodnim Gram pozitivnim bakterijama, kao {to je L. monocytogenes, te bi se oni eventualno mogli dodavati u hranu, u cilju smanjenja opasnosti od pojave listerioze na minimum. U ovom radu su prikazani rezultati ispitivanja osetljivosti razli~itih serotipova Listeria monocytogenes prema pet bakteriocina mle~nokiselinskih bakterija na dve temperature inkubacije (37 o C/24 h i 4 o C/12 dana). Od 50 klini~kih humanih izolata izdvojeno je 6 serotipova, dok je od 48 izolata poreklom iz namirnica animalnog porekla ustanovljeno 8 serotipova. Ustanovljeno je da bakeriocini poreklom od Lactobacillus sake 148 nisu ispoljili inhibitorni efekat ni prema jednom serotipu listerija, dok su bakteriocini poreklom od Lactobacillus sake 265, Pediococcus 347 i Lactobacillus sake 706 imali listericidni efekat skoro prema svim ispitivanim serotipovima. Bakteriocini su ispoljili najve}i inhibitorni efekat prema serotipovima 4c i 4, pri inkubaciji od 37 o C/24h i prema serotipovima 1/2b i 4b, pri inkubaciji na 4 o C/12 dana. Tako e je ustanovljeno da je temperatura inkubacije uticala na inhibitorne efekte bakteriocina.