West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2017: September 2

Similar documents
West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2017: August 19

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2018: June 23

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2018: For week ending July 7

MANITOBA HEALTH, HEALTHY LIVING & SENIORS WEEKLY WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE REPORT (WEEK 34)

Manitoba Weekly West Nile virus Surveillance Report

MANITOBA HEALTH, HEALTHY LIVING & SENIORS WEEKLY WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE REPORT (WEEK 36)

MANITOBA HEALTH, HEALTHY LIVING & SENIORS WEEKLY WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE REPORT (WEEK 31)

Alberta s Response Plan (2005)

Arbovirus Surveillance in Massachusetts 2016 Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) Arbovirus Surveillance Program

WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE IN MADISON AND DANE COUNTY

West Nile Virus and Other Mosquito-borne Diseases National Surveillance Report English Edition September 11 to September 17, 2016 (Week 37)

West Nile Virus and Other Mosquito-borne Diseases National Surveillance Report English Edition September 18 to September 24, 2016 (Week 38)

Saskatchewan Cancer Control Report. Profiling Cancer in Regional Health Authorities

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

Wetlands and West Nile

Massachusetts Arbovirus Surveillance and Response Plan

Controlling Urban Epidemics of West Nile Virus Infection

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

NEBRASKA ARBOVIRUS SURVEILLANCE AND MOSQUITO MONITORING PROGRAM 2018 UPDATE #2

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

FMEL Arboviral Epidemic Risk Assessment: Fourth Update for 2010 Week 22 (May 31, 2010)

Outbreak investigation

2012 Abundance Avg Abundance Abundance

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT SERVICES HALDIMAND-NORFOLK. West Nile Virus Report

FMEL Arboviral Epidemic Risk Assessment: Seventh Update for 2010 Week 36 (September 09, 2010)

Chatham County WNV Outbreak, What the heck are they doing down there? Robert A. Moulis Pamela T. Thompson Chatham County Mosquito Control

Alberta West Nile virus wild bird surveillance 2006

Monthly Summaries. Mosquito and West Nile Virus Surveillance. May through August 2007

The Incursion and Expansion of West Nile Virus into Canada

CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUGUST 2017 MONTHLY REPORT

METHADONE PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT 2012 AND BUSINESS PLAN 2013

Fight The Bite. Michelle Cole Auburn University Outreach Director

West Nile Virus in the Region of Peel 2002

NORTH SHORE MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT 2018 Surveillance Summary

Zoonotic Disease Report June 03 June 09, 2018 (Week 23)

Alberta West Nile virus wild bird surveillance 2004

WNV, Italian approach. Simonetta Pupella

West Nile Virus Update. April 15, 2014

West Nile Virus Los Angeles County

Evidence Based Considerations for Adult Mosquito Control

SASKATCHEWAN METHADONE PROGRAM

West Nile Virus Program Final Report West Nile Virus. Mosquito BIle ProI8ctIon. .~...aodllogll""",,~-,iiiciuciiif~_8fici""""""

ALBERTA WEST NILE VIRUS Summary Report

Epidemiological Profile of West Nile Virus in Kent County, Michigan

Global Climate Change and Mosquito-Borne Diseases

WNV surveillance and prevention of transfusion transmission in Italy

West Nile Virus Surveillance in mosquito vectors (Culex pipiens)

The number of newly identified HIV cases decreased. There was a sharp drop in both male and female HIV rates in 2013.

western Canadian mustard 2003

Vector-Borne Diseases Summary Report

ADULT MOSQUITO SURVEILLANCE. Introduction

Mosquito Control Matters

Protecting You and Your Community from West Nile Virus. Eagle County Environmental Health Department

TREATING THE REHAB PATIENT WITH WEST NILE VIRUS. Amy J. Wilson MD Medical Director, Baylor Institution of Rehabilitation January 2014

West Nile Virus Surveillance and Response Plan

West Nile Virus. Lyndon Badcoe PhD Epidemiologist

The profile of people living with HIV

Mosquito Threats in LA County West Nile virus & Zika

Vector-Borne Diseases Summary Report

IPM & the West Nile Virus Epidemic, Greece, Terms to Know. Which is more dangerous? Florida and Thessaloniki, Greece

Analysis of West Nile Virus in Franklin County, Pennsylvania

Dallas County Health and Human Services Arbovirus Surveillance Report Week 39 ending September 29, 2018

University of California Research in Coachella Valley: a quarter century of collaboration

2015 Mosquito Abatement Plan QUALITY OF LIFE & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MARCH 23, 2015

West Nile virus and Other Mosquito borne Diseases National Surveillance Report English Edition

Perspectives on the Mosquitoes of Wisconsin and the Upper Midwest

Thomas McGee, L.C. 920 Main Street, Suite 1700 Kansas City, MO (816) * Toll Free (800) WEST NILE VIRUS

UNDERSTANDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DRIVERS INFLUENCING THE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RISK OF VECTOR BORNE DISEASES

State of Oregon West Nile Virus Summary Report 2008

WEST NILE VIRUS PLAN

West Nile Virus Activity in Harris County, Texas Rudy Bueno, Jr., Ph.D. Division Director, HCPHES Mosquito Control

West Nile Virus. By Frank Riusech

Mosquitoborne Viral Diseases

WEST NILE VIRUS AND OTHER MOSQUITO-BORNE DISEASE NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE REPORT

Evaluation of the West Nile Surveillance System for the State of Kansas

Ministry of Health Population Health Branch

Quality of western Canadian mustard 2008

I. Provincial West Nile Virus Program Information

State of Oregon West Nile Virus Summary Report

MOSQUITO CONTROL PLAN

Collecting Anopheles in Loudoun County,

The Moreno Valley Fire Department Offers The Following Water Safety Information:

West Nile Virus. Family: Flaviviridae

LIST OF APPENDICES. Appendix B Ontario Regulation 558/91 Specification of Communicable Diseases

Disease Carrying Insects

West Nile virus and Other Mosquito-borne Diseases National Surveillance Report August 6 to August 12, 2017 (Week 32)

Metropolitan Mosquito Control District. Metropolitan counties working together to prevent insect transmitted disease and annoyance since 1958

UNDERSTANDING ZIKA AND MOSQUITO BORNE ILLNESSES

Disease Detectives Investigate West Nile Virus (Suggested Time: 20 minutes)

West Nile Virus and West Nile Encephalitis Frequently Asked Questions

Role of Corvids in the epidemiology of West Nile virus in California*

Quality. western Canadian Canola 2017 ISSN Véronique J. Barthet Oilseeds Program Manager. Contact: Véronique J. Barthet

Mosquito Threats in Burbank West Nile virus and Zika Update. Presented by Kelly Middleton, Director of Community Affairs

VIRGINIA ARBOVIRAL ACTIVITY IN David N. Gaines, Ph.D. VDH Office of Epidemiology

Vector-Borne Diseases Summary Report

Managing Flea Beetles in Canola Julie Soroka

WEST NILE VIRUS AND OTHER MOSQUITO-BORNE DISEASE NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE REPORT

Surveillance Summary, 2012

West Nile virus and Other Mosquito-borne Diseases National Surveillance Report July 30 to August 5, 2017 (Week 31)

Transcription:

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2017: September 2 Table of Contents 1. West Nile virus transmission risk page 2 2. Degree-day accumulations page 3 3. Mosquito surveillance results page 5 4. West Nile virus animal cases page 7 5. West Nile virus human cases page 8 saskatchewan.ca

1. West Nile virus transmission risk (week ending September 2, 2017) Culex tarsalis mosquito numbers have declined in south and central Saskatchewan. WNV positive Culex tarsalis mosquitoes were found this past week. Infected mosquitoes remain in the environment. West Nile virus transmission risk remains moderate in the southern mixed grass ecological risk area (zone 4) and low in the more northerly boreal transition and moist mixed grass ecological risk areas (zones 2 and 3). Conditions are conducive for the transmission of WNV to people. Culex tarsalis mosquitoes are most active on warm evenings and between dusk and dawn. People are advised to take precautions (i.e. using mosquito repellents, limiting time outside during peak times of mosquito activity) to reduce their risk of exposure to mosquito bites and West Nile virus. The risk of acquiring West Nile virus (WNV) infection in humans depends on various factors including time of year, number and location of infected Culex tarsalis mosquitoes, and number of days with sufficient heat. Culex tarsalis is a common summer mosquito throughout the agricultural portions of Saskatchewan, and is abundant in the southern areas of the province where it is hotter and drier. It is rarely found in the northern forested areas. The risk of WNV transmission is low in the spring but often rises through the early and midsummer period, reaching a peak during the latter part of July and August. The WNV risk levels may vary from minimal, when Culex tarsalis mosquitoes are rare and the weather has not been conducive for virus to cycle in mosquitoes and birds, to high when there are high numbers of infected mosquitoes and the weather and habitat conditions have been optimal for mosquito development, biting activity and transmission of the virus to humans. Risk levels are determined in Saskatchewan through mosquito surveillance indicators such as Culex tarsalis numbers and infection rates, degree day or heat accumulation and other relevant weather factors such as precipitation. The level of risk in mosquitoes is determined by using infection rates in mosquitoes (expressed as the number of infected mosquitoes/1000) and risk index calculated as: the infection rate X the average Culex tarsalis per trap night/1000). Other relevant factors that help determine risk to humans include: time of year, the status of mosquito larval populations, past and predicted weather patterns, adult mosquito population age and trend, proximity to populated areas and other indicators such as positive birds or horses. West Nile Virus Risk Minimal The mosquito species that carries WNV has not been detected. This does not mean risk is zero. Low The mosquito species that carries WNV has been detected in small numbers. There is a low probability of being bitten by an infected mosquito. Moderate WNV positive mosquitoes have been detected in numbers where there is a moderate probability of being bitten by an infected mosquito. High High numbers of WNV positive mosquitoes have been identified and are widespread. There is an increasing and high probability of being bitten by an infected mosquito. 2

2. Degree-day accumulations Degree-days continue to slowly accumulate with the continuing warm weather in central and southern Saskatchewan. However, cooler night-time temperatures are offsetting the higher day-time temperatures and limiting Culex tarsalis biting activity and virus transmission to the early evening hours. Degree-day accumulations are most advanced in south central Saskatchewan with over 500 degree-days accumulated in this area (Figure 1). Figure 1: Degree day accumulations Prairie Provinces (August 27, 2017) Note: The map covers the agricultural portion of Prairie Provinces. There is more habitat and higher numbers of Culex tarsalis in the southern portion of this area. Culex tarsalis is rarely found in forested areas. Map courtesy of Agriculture and Agri-food Canada.

Degree-day: a measurement of heat accumulation from April 1. The threshold temperature below which WNV development and transmission is unlikely to occur in Culex tarsalis mosquitoes is 14.3 C. Degreedays are calculated by subtracting the threshold or base temperature from the daily mean temperature. These are then summed to provide the total accumulation for the season. Example: Mean daily temperature = 19.3 C; threshold temperature = 14.3 C; 19.3-14.3 = 5.0 degree-days. Degree-days are used in two ways. First, during the season a running total of accumulated degree-days is recorded. On average, it takes approximately 250 to 300 degree-days (base 14.3 C) before the second generation of Culex tarsalis emerges. Females of this generation are most numerous and are largely responsible for transmission of WNV to humans. A total of 109 degree-days are required for virus development to be completed within a particular population and for potential transmission to occur. The risk of WNV transmission increases with increasing degree-day accumulation. Moreover, consistently warmer temperatures will significantly shorten virus development time in the mosquitoes. This increases the potential risk of WNV transmission, if the virus is present and other conditions are favorable.

3. Mosquito surveillance results, 2017 Numbers of Culex tarsalis continue to decline in south and central Saskatchewan (Table 1). Numbers will decline to lower levels as increasing numbers of newly-emerged females enter diapause, or hibernation. However, infected older females are still present throughout southern and central Saskatchewan. Culex tarsalis will be limited in its biting activity to warmer evenings and into the early night, when temperatures are greater than 15 C. It is important to note that Culex tarsalis will become active earlier in the evening now that dusk is occurring earlier at this time of year. They can also be active on cloudy, warm days or in shaded areas. The hot dry conditions have reduced total mosquito numbers to low levels throughout southern and central Saskatchewan. Culex tarsalis remains one of the dominant mosquitoes captured this past week in traps. Number of Culex tarsalis mosquitoes Table 1: Average number of Culex tarsalis mosquitoes captured by date and ecological risk area, 2017 Surveillance Week ending (1) Boreal Forest (Mamawetan Churchill River, Keewatin Yatthé Health Regions) Ŧ (2) Boreal Transition (Prince Albert Parkland, Kelsey Trail Health Regions) (3) Moist Mixed-Grass Prairie (Sunrise, Saskatoon, Prairie North Health Regions) (4) Mixed-Grass Prairie (Sun Country, Regina Qu Appelle, Five Hills, Cypress, Heartland Health Regions) Jun 10 - - 0 1.38 Jun 17 - - 0 3.77 Jun 24 - - 0.08 0.75 Jul 1 - - 0.15 0.79 Jul 8 - - 0.1 4.98 Jul 15-1.0 0.31 8.15 Jul 22-0.25 0.65 4.98 Jul 29-0.67 1.16 7.69 Aug 5-1.5 6.4 16.34 Aug 12-0.8 2.9 7.17 Aug 19-2.2 3.5 3.3 Aug 26-1.8 0.8 2.7 Sep 2 Average * - 0.7 1.34 5.3 Notes: *Averages are determined by dividing the total number of Culex tarsalis mosquitoes caught by the total number of trapping nights. Ŧ Due to extremely low numbers of Culex mosquitoes, trapping is generally not done in the Boreal Forest ecological risk area. Trapping does not begin in the Boreal Transition ecological risk area until mid- July.

Number of mosquito pools testing positive Table 2: Number of WNV positive Culex tarsalis mosquito pools *, percent positive pools and total number of pools tested by date and ecological risk area, 2017 Ŧ Week Ending (2) Boreal Transition (3) Moist Mixed-grass Prairie (4) Mixed-grass Prairie Weekly Totals Positive Tested Percentage Positive Tested Percentage Positive Tested Percentage Positive Tested Percentage Jun 10 - - - 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 Jun 17 - - - 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 Jun 24 - - - 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 11 0 Jul 1 - - - 0 1 0 0 17 0 0 18 0 Jul 8 - - - 0 1 0 0 24 0 0 25 0 Jul 15 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 27 3.8 1 31 3.3 Jul 22 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 30 0 0 38 0 Jul 29 0 4 0 0 8 0 1 34 2.9 1 46 2.2 Aug 5 0 5 0 0 13 0 4 43 9.3 4 61 6.6 Aug 12 0 3 0 0 13 0 2 36 5.6 2 52 3.8 Aug 19 0 5 0 0 11 0 0 23 0 0 39 0 Aug 26 0 2 0 0 7 0 2 31 6.5 2 40 5.0 Sep 2 Total 0 22 0 0 64 0 10 301 3.3 10 387 2.6 Notes: * Mosquito Pool - Mosquitoes of the same species, collected from the same trap on the same date are pooled together for the purposes of laboratory testing. Culex mosquitoes (including Culex tarsalis, Culex restuans and Culex territans) collected from one trap on a given night are placed in species specific pools of up to 50 mosquitoes for WNV testing. Other non-culex species, most notably Culiseta inornata, are occasionally placed in pools and tested as well. When more than 50 mosquitoes of the same species are collected from the same trap, additional pools are created for testing. A positive pool refers to the detection of WNV in one or more mosquitoes collected from a given trap. Percent positive pools are calculated as follows: (Number of positive pools) X 100 = Percent positive pools (Total number tested) Ŧ Due to extremely low numbers of Culex mosquitoes, trapping is generally not done in the Boreal Forest ecological risk area. Trapping does not begin in the Boreal Transition risk area until mid- July.

4. West Nile virus animal cases, 2017 Infections in animals such as horses are seasonal and often occur later in the season. The virus is well established in mosquito vectors in Saskatchewan. As WNV infections in horses lag behind infections in mosquitoes, mosquito surveillance provides more timely information about the risk to the general public. Infections in horses can provide an indication that infections in humans may be occurring as well. There were three additional WNV positive horses reported this past week in Saskatchewan, bringing the total positive horses to four. One additional WNV positive bird was found incidentally in the week ending August 19, bringing the total positive birds to four in 2017. Table 3: Number of West Nile virus positive horses by date and ecological risk area, 2017 Week ending (1) Boreal Forest (2) Boreal Transition (3) Moist Mixed-Grass Prairie (4) Mixed-Grass Prairie Weekly totals Jun 10 0 0 0 0 0 Jun 17 0 0 0 0 0 Jun 24 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 1 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 8 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 15 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 22 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 29 0 0 0 0 0 Aug 5 0 0 0 0 0 Aug 12 0 0 0 0 0 Aug 19 0 1 0 0 1 Aug 26 0 0 1 2 3 Sep 2 Sep 9 Total 0 1 1 2 4

5. West Nile virus human cases, 2017 and 2003-2016 As with horses, human infections are seasonal and are often not detected until later in the season. Mosquito surveillance and other environmental risk indicators provide a more timely indication of risk. Table 4: West Nile virus surveillance in humans, 2017 (as of week ending August 26, 2017) Number of WNV Positive Lab Tests* WNV Neuroinvasive Disease Ŧ WNV Deaths 2 0 0 Notes: * Includes tests done by Saskatchewan Disease Control Laboratory and Canadian Blood Services. Personal information including clinical symptoms and exposure histories is not available. There may be multiple positive tests for one person. A positive laboratory test does not necessarily indicate a current WNV infection - it may show a WNV infection from the previous year or a cross-reaction with other viruses. As WNV infection may be transmitted through blood products, Canadian Blood Services screens all blood donations. Includes tests detected through screening of blood donors. Ŧ The most useful indicator for the burden of disease in the general population is WNV neuroinvasive disease. For every case of WNV neuroinvasive disease there are approximately 150 WNV infections in humans. The vast majority of people with WNV infections do not seek medical care. Table 5: Saskatchewan Human West Nile virus neuroinvasive cases 2003-2016* Year Neuroinvasive Cases Deaths 2003 63 7 2004 0 0 2005 6 3 2006 3 0 2007 76 6 2008 1 0 2009 0 0 2010 0 0 2011 0 0 2012 0 0 2013 7 1 2014 1 0 2015 0 0 2016 0 0 Total 157 17 Note: *Deaths are included in WNV Neuroinvasive disease case numbers except for 2003 when two deaths occurred in people with non-neuroinvasive West Nile Fever.