Glyphosate and Cancer Risk. Jeffrey Jenkins, Ph.D. Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology Oregon State University

Similar documents
R.E.D. FACTS. Limonene. Pesticide Reregistration. Use Profile

Classifying Foods as Carcinogenic? A Case Study of Red and Processed Meats.

INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS TITLE 27, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS

WHO Human Health Risk Assessment Toolkit: Chemical Hazards

Risk Characterization

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

Pesticide Product Labels What the label says.and Why. Dr. Jeff Birk BASF Corporation Regulatory Manager

Cancer & the Environment: What is known, & what can we do to prevent cancer?

Subject: Assessing the Potential Risk of Human Exposure to Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene) and Formaldehyde

Glyphosate: Get the Facts NEPPSC

Environmental Exposures and Cancer Hazards

Provisional Translation Original: Japanese

Glyphosate Hazard and Risk Assessment: A Comparison of the Approaches of Two International Agencies

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE

Regarding Establishment of a Uniform Limit in a Positive List System concerning Agricultural Chemicals Residues in Food etc.

The Second Draft of Provisional Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for Agricultural Chemicals in Foods

The Carcinogenicity of Glyphosate Kate Z. Guyton, PhD DABT

Pesticides and Health. Lynn R. Goldman, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins Blooomberg School of Public Health

Health Risks Assessment A WHO perspective. Dr E. van Deventer

Glyphosate and Cancer Buying Science

FAQs on bisphenol A in consumer products

Outline: risk assessment. What kind of environmental risks do we commonly consider? 11/19/2013. Why do we need chemical risk assessment?

Quantitative Risk Assessment: An Overview and Discussion of Emerging Issues. Anne-Marie Nicol, PhD

Priorities for Occupational Cancer Research and Prevention in Canada Paul A. Demers, PhD

The regulatory landscape. The now and the not yet

Codex MRL Setting and Harmonization. Yukiko Yamada, Ph.D.

Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1215

Carcinogenicity of Glyphosate The IARC Monographs. Dana Loomis PhD Deputy Head Monographs Programme

CHAPTER 2: RISK ANALYSIS

WHO Research Agenda for RF fields

Health Canada Roles and Responsibilities - Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and Safety Code 6

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Residential and commercial construction applications. Non-treated dimensional lumber products manufactured from softwoods.

DOWNLOAD OR READ : IONIZING RADIATION EFFECTS IN ELECTRONICS FROM MEMORIES TO IMAGERS DEVICES CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS BOOK 50 PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

DOWNLOAD OR READ : INTERNATIONAL SERIES OF MONOGRAPHS IN CEREBROVISCERAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY AND CONDITIONED REFLEXES PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Anne-Marie Nicol, PhD Assistant Professor School of Population and Public Health

DICOFOL (026) EXPLANATION

Title: Scientific principles for the identification of endocrine disrupting chemicals a consensus statement

Contemporary Issues in Risk Assessment. June 17, 2015

What is a Genetically Modified Food?

Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1288

New Pesticide Fact Sheet

October 31, Brief summaries of each expert s significant conclusions regarding the epidemiological and toxicological data are provided below.

The WHO International EMF Project: The road ahead

aaaaaaaa Information Document on the Proposal to Reinstate Saccharin for Use as a Sweetener in Foods in Canada

Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. - according to REACH regulation

Dieldrin and cancer concerns on the Bellarine Peninsula

Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1219

EFSA Statement regarding the EU assessment of glyphosate and the socalled

2B: possibly carcinogenic to humans! A communication challenge

Health Consultation. Apple Trees Recreational Area (PICA Site 192) PICATINNY ARSENAL ROCKAWAY TOWNSHIP, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Health Canada Roles and Responsibilities - Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and Safety Code 6

Material Safety Data Sheet Material Name: Warren Premium Oil Dry Absorbent

Recent Developments and Future Plans in the EFSA Assessments of Pesticides. Hermine Reich Pesticides Unit

Donate. Cellular Phone Towers

Science Policy Notice

October 9, Dead-Fast Insecticide Chalk (EPA Reg. No ) contains the active ingredient tralomethrin (Chemical Code ).

Safety Data Sheet Product No Toluidine Blue O, Certified Issue Date ( ) Review Date ( )

M A T E R I A L S A F E T Y D A T A

MEDICAL SCIENCES - Vol.II -The Need For an International Approach The Role of FAO and WHO - Jorgen Schlundt and Kazuaki Miyagishima

Last Updated: March 8, 2016

Name: Class: Date: ID: A

Chapter 17 Human Health and Environmental Risks

I. Framework. A. All materials must be reviewed by the NOSB. B. Inert ingredient is a misleading term. November 4, 2011

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

Material Safety Data Sheet

ESTIMATION OF TOXICITY TO HUMANS

Cancerous Contradictions: The Mis-Regulation of Human Carcinogens Based on Animal Data

FDA s Food Additives Program

Applicators and Pesticide Toxicity

COMMUNITY WATER FLUORIDATION MYTHBUSTERS

Special Review Decision: Imazapyr

Monsanto s Spin on its Roundup herbicide is Unwinding

Safety Data Sheet MasterEmaco ADH 1490 PART B also CONCRESIVE 1490 PTB Revision date : 2012/01/27 Page: 1/7

Dangers of Precaution. By Angela Logomasini, Ph.D. Competitive Enterprise Institute For the Washington Policy Center July 23, 2009

WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/77 English only Bentazone in Drinking-water

Brussels, 24 January Dear Madam, Dear Sir,

Recent Results from the IARC Monographs: Carcinogenicity of Consuming Red & Processed Meat, Coffee and Very Hot Beverages

12 HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT

Radiofrequency Exposure and Human Health

Annie J. Sasco, MD, MPH, MS, DrPH

Date Printed: 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Addendum to the 12th Report on Carcinogens

Wireless Radiation in Schools - Fact Sheet and Directives

Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1256

SAFETY DATA SHEET CD4 Monoclonal FITC Antibody (Clone RIV7)

CAS-No. EC-No. Index-No. Concentration Ampicillin

Chapter 6 Physical and chemical quality of drinking water

European Union legislation on Food additives, Food enzymes, Extractions solvents and Food flavourings

Considerations on the statistical methods used to assess carcinogenicity studies of pesticides with emphasis on glyphosate

SAFETY DATA SHEET DUSTLESS COLORED & WHITE CHALK SDS ID: Issue date: 04/11/2013 Revision Date: ---

SAFETY DATA SHEET CD34 Monoclonal FITC Antibody (Clone ICO-115)

Wood dust regulation and prevention - a trade union perspective

The Possible Harmful Biological Effects of Low Level Electromagnetic Fields of Frequencies up to 300 GHz. IEE Position Statement - May 2002

Sacramento Rendering Company Health Risk Assessment

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Timberline Prestique Grandé Shingles

Human Health Risk Assessment Overview [For the APS/OPP Roundtable]

degussa creating essentials Material Safety Data Sheet

Transcription:

Glyphosate and Cancer Risk Jeffrey Jenkins, Ph.D. Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology Oregon State University

Cancer and Human Health Cancer is considered the most severe health condition for the following reasons: As a result of the aging of the human population, cancer is today the most common cause of death in the world. (WHO, 2014) There are many forms of cancer. Cancer occurs in one of every 2 men and 3 women. Causes of cancer: genes, lifestyle, diet, chemicals.

The role of genes and environment in the development of cancer Familial risk ratios = risk to a relative of an affected individual divided by the population prevalence Percentages = the attributable-fraction of cancer deaths due to the specified environmental risk factor Anand et. al., Cancer is a Preventable Disease that Requires Major Lifestyle Changes. Pharm Res (2008)

Cancer Prevention EPA cancer risk assessment goal: prevent excess cancers due to chemical exposure Often assumes daily exposure over a lifetime (~70 years) Cancer odds (all causes) 1 in 2 (men); 1 in 3 (women) Acceptable excess cancer risk 1 in 1 million (10-6 ) For each chemical, cancer odds 1 in 2.000001 (men)

How Does the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Assess Risk? National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 4-step risk assessment Paradigm*: How Hazard is it Identification Harmful? How Dose- much to Response cause Assessment harm? Will I be exposed, how Exposure much, how often? What is Risk my risk? Characterization * From the National Research Council s Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, 1983.

EPA Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention harmonized test guidelines : 810 - Product Performance 830 - Product Properties 835 - Fate, Transport and Transformation 840 - Spray Drift 850 - Ecological Effects 860 - Residue Chemistry 870 - Health Effects 875 - Occupational and Residential Exposure 880 - Biochemicals 885 - Microbial Pesticide 890 - Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program

Pesticide Registration process Register or reregister a pesticide if it can be used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. Pesticide registration in the U.S. is a dynamic process. As new science and information becomes available a pesticide product s registration status may be changed. This is accomplished through the EPA Office of Pesticide Programs registration review process. Current goal reevaluate each registered pesticide at least every 15 years.

Long-term Animal Study Assumptions Animal models will predict cancer in humans. High dose, short term, exposure of animals will predict adverse effects of low dose, long term, exposure in humans.

Does a chemical cause cancer? Weight-of-the-evidence approach Summarize human and animal data: sufficient, limited, inadequate, no data, no evidence Look at other evidence: short-term tests, pharmacokinetics, structure-activity relationships Classify overall weight-of-the-evidence

EPA 2005 Guidelines Weight-of-evidence narrative EPA weight of evidence descriptors : Carcinogenic to humans Likely to be carcinogenic to humans Suggestive evidence of carcinogenic potential Inadequate information to assess carcinogenic potential Not likely to be carcinogenic to humans

GMO Corn & Glyphosate WHO IARC

Protests and cancer concerns raise doubts for Roundup's future in Europe (2015) Credit: Reuters Demonstrators participate in a protest march against Monsanto in Paris, France, May 23, 2015. People in 48 countries and 421 cities took part in protest marches against Monsanto and its glyphosate-containing Roundup herbicide.

June 17, 2018 Johnson, 46, is the first of hundreds of cancer patients to see his case against Monsanto go to trial.

Does Glyphosate Cause Cancer? US National Institute of Health, National Toxicology Program (NTP) No evidence of carcinogenic activity US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Not likely to be carcinogenic to humans European Union, Canada, Australia, Japan No evidence of carcinogenicity Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) glyphosate unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans from exposure through the diet WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Probable human carcinogen

WHO IARC Monographs Programme Appointed expert working group meets for 7 to 8 days, determines likelihood that an agent can cause cancer in humans. Agents classified by IARC, Vol. 1 114 (1976-2016) Red meat 1 Ethanol in alcoholic beverages 1 Solar radiation 1 Wood dust 1 Hairdresser or Barber 2A Glyphosate 2A Coffee 2B Gasoline 2B Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (cell phones) 2B Group 1 Carcinogenic to humans (118) Group 2A Probably carcinogenic to humans (75) Group 2B Possibly carcinogenic to humans (288) Group 3 Not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans (503) Group 4 Probably not carcinogenic to humans (1)

Hazard vs Risk EPA, EU and other governments evaluate cancer risk; an estimate of the carcinogenic effects expected from exposure to a cancer hazard. WHO s IARC Monographs Programme evaluates cancer hazard; is an agent capable of causing cancer under some circumstances. WHO glyphostate cancer hazard determination based largely on epidemiology, did not consider most scientific studies evaluated for registration by US, Canada, EU, Australia, Japan.

When IARC assessed glyphosate, significant changes were made between a draft of its report and the published version. Multiple scientists' conclusions that their studies had found no link between glyphosate and cancer in laboratory animals was removed. The agency won't say who made the changes or why.