Proposed Expansion of the Patient Safety Indicator Set Patrick S. Romano, MD MPH UC Davis/USA

Similar documents
A Pause in the Availability of Risk Adjusted National Benchmarks for AHRQ Indicators and an Alternative Measurement Approach

Appendix 1. Validation studies of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) patient safety indicator (PSI) Validated PSI and author

6/30/2015. Lunch and Learn. Objectives. Who owns Quality and Patient Safety? We all do It s a Balance of Responsibility

Analysis of the impact of AHRQ exclusions on the variation in Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) values

Appendix G Explanation/Clarification Summary

Reliability and Validity of PPCs in the MHAC Program

Medicare Hospital Acquired Conditions Reduction Program Andrew B. Wheeler Vice President of Federal Finance

Reporting Period and Reliability of AHRQ, CMS 30-day and HAC Quality Measures - Revised

Measure Applications Partnership. Hospital Workgroup In-Person Meeting Follow- Up Call

SCORES FOR 4 TH QUARTER, RD QUARTER, 2014

FY X Time (48 hrs for cardiac surgery) SCIP-Inf-4 Cardiac Surgery Patients With Controlled 6 A.M. Postoperative Blood

Appendix. Potentially Preventable Complications (PPCs) identify. complications that can occur during an admission. There are 64

Early Ambulation Reduces the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Knee Replacement. Marilyn Szekendi, PhD, RN

Mandatory Elements of Healthcare Reform Walter Coleman. healthcare consulting

Table 1. Proposed Measures for Use in Establishing Quality Performance Standards that ACOs Must Meet for Shared Savings

50198 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 157 / Monday, August 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

including prevention, healthy lifestyle behaviors, populations at risk & disparities (age, race/ ethnicity, gender, geographic & socioeconomic)

The following content was supplied by the author as supporting material and has not been copy-edited or verified by JBJS.

The patient safety indicators (PSIs) were developed as a

Connecticut Joint Replacement Institute (CJRI) Outcomes Report

Data Comparability in Patient Safety Indicators

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Performance Measure. Inpatient Clinical Process of Care Measures

Guide to Patient Safety Indicators

ICD-10 IMPLEMENTATION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR HEALTH DATA ORGANIZATIONS (USING AHRQ QUALITY INDICATORS)

Diagnostic Algorithms in VTE

2016 Hospital Measures

NYU School of Medicine Department of Radiology Rotation-Specific House Staff Evaluation

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis

1. SCOPE of GUIDELINE:

Wind, Water, Wound, Walk Do the Data Deliver the Dictum?

Introduction. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),

Registry Highlights. Dale Daniel Symposium Hip Fracture Registry. Overall Volume by Year and Region 3/7/2014

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Outline of This Presentation

What ASMBS Members Need to Know About: New Medicare Payment Policy Governing Bariatric Surgery and Hospital Acquired Conditions (HACs)

Venous Thromboembolism. Prevention

Prescribe appropriate immunizations for. Prescribe childhood immunization as per. Prescribe influenza vaccinations in high-risk

Predicting Short Term Morbidity following Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

FloridaHealthFinder.gov

Σάββας Σουρμελής Διευθυντής Β Ορθοπαιδικής Κλινικής ΔΘΚΑ «Υγεία» Αναγνώριση παραγόντων κινδύνου της φλεβικής θρόμβωσης.

INFERIOR VENA CAVA FILTERS QUIZ 10 QUESTIONS MAY 5, 2014

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Deep vein thrombosis and its prevention in critically ill adults Attia J, Ray J G, Cook D J, Douketis J, Ginsberg J S, Geerts W H

2016 AMC Quality and Accountability Performance Scorecard Vidant Medical Center. Overall Rank. Overall Score 63.4% Efficiency 7.

Clinical Policy: Dalteparin (Fragmin) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.207 Effective Date:

Use of EKOS Catheter in the management of Venous Mr. Manoj Niverthi, Mr. Sarang Pujari, and Ms. Nupur Dandavate, The GTF Group

Hayden Smith, PhD, MPH /\ v._

Pulmonary Embolectomy:

JAWDA Bariatric Quality Performance Indicators. JAWDA Quarterly Guidelines for Bariatric Surgery (BS)

Is Readmission a Good Quality Measure for Surgical Care? Examining the Underlying Reasons for Readmissions after Surgery at ACS NSQIP Hospitals

A A U

ARTEMIS. ARixtra (fondaparinux) for ThromboEmbolism prevention in. a Medical Indications Study. NV Organon Protocol 63129

AN AUDIT: THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS FOR TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT PATIENTS AT NORTHWICK PARK AND CENTRAL MIDDLESEX HOSPITALS

SUB TOPIC 3 : CLINICAL INDICATORS (CLINICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE CQA)

Inferior Venacaval Filters Valuable vs. Dangerous Valuable Annie Kulungowski. Department of Surgery Grand Rounds March 24, 2008

Emergency Medicine Scope of Practice

Recommendations for Hospital Quality Measures in 2011:

ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY (AKI) ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME (ARDS) ADVANCED DIRECTIVE LIMITING CARE...91 AGE...9 AGE UNITS...

ICD-10 IMPLEMENTATION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR HEALTH DATA ORGANIZATIONS

Boston Experience: Benchmark for the Nation

Present-on-Admission (POA) Coding

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Prophylaxis and the Incidence of Hospital Acquired VTE(HAQ VTE) Olaide Akande, MBChB Mentor: John Hall, MD, FACP

Methodological Issues

Massive Transfusion in Pediatric Trauma: Analysis of the National Trauma Databank

Surgical Consensus Standards Endorsement Maintenance NQF-Endorsed Surgical Maintenance Standards (Phase II) Table of Contents

A comparison of peri-operative outcomes between elective and non-elective total hip arthroplasties

Clinical Safety & Effectiveness Session # 9

Q1 Contact Information

Core = Core required measures for all CAH nationally r = Required by State of Minnesota X = Additional for MBQIP

Objectives. Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis. Case VTE WHY DO IT? Question: Who Is At Risk?

SURGERY OR ANESTHESIA

Prevalence of Symptomatic Venous Thrombo-Embolism in Patients with Total Contact Cast for Diabetic foot Complications A Retrospective Case Series.

Proprietary Acute Care Indicators

Top 5 (or so) Hematology Consults. Tom DeLoughery, MD FACP FAWM. Oregon Health and Sciences University DISCLOSURE

Corporate Medical Policy

Audit of perioperative management of patients with fracture neck of femur

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.

Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism

Inferior Vena Cava Filter for DVT

Venous Thrombosis. Magnitude of the Problem. DVT 2 Million PE 600,000. Death 60,000. Estimated Cost of VTE Care $1.5 Billion/year.

Enhanced Recovery After Colorectal Surgery at Royal Inland Hospital Kamloops, BC. Our Data Experience

Hemodynamic Optimization HOW TO IMPLEMENT?

SURGERY OR ANESTHESIA

Patient Pain and Function Survey

Appropriate documentationwhy it matters. Eric Cornatzer MD Baptist Princeton Hospital

DVT PROPHYLAXIS IN HOSPITALIZED MEDICAL PATIENTS SAURABH MAJI SR (PULMONARY,MEDICINE)

Unit 11. Objectives. Indications for IV Therapy. Intravenous Access Devices & Common IV Fluids. 3 categories. Maintenance Replacement Restoration

Drug Class Review Newer Oral Anticoagulant Drugs

Clinical Policy: Dalteparin (Fragmin) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.207 Effective Date:

Sasha Dubrovsky, MSc MD FRCPC Pediatric Emergency Medicine Montreal Children s Hospital - MUHC October 2010

Mapping ICD 9 CM to ICD 10: Lessons Learned

CHAPTER 2 VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM

The spectrum of clinical outcome of PE

Distinguishing hospital complications of care from pre-existing conditions

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism

Misunderstandings of Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Transfusion & Mortality. Philippe Van der Linden MD, PhD

VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM: DURATION OF TREATMENT

Transcription:

Proposed Expansion of the Patient Safety Indicator Set Patrick S. Romano, MD MPH UC Davis/USA OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Patient Safety Subgroup 9 May 2012

AHRQ PSIs endorsed by OECD (after review of data limitations) Foreign body left in during procedure (PSI 5) Catheter associated bloodstream infection (PSI 7) Dropped due to problems with international comparability given lack of specificity of ICD-10 code Postoperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis (PSI 12) Postoperative sepsis (PSI 13) Accidental puncture and laceration (PSI 15) Obstetric trauma - vaginal delivery w instrument (PSI 18) Obstetric trauma - vaginal delivery w/out instrument (PSI 19) 2

Key learnings from 2009-2011 Many OECD countries can report PSI rates using either ICD-9- CM or ICD-10 coded data Age/sex standardization can be performed but has little impact on cross-country comparisons Same-day or short-stay cases need to be excluded Some exclusions (e.g., non-elective admissions) have erratic effects and must be modified or dropped for cross-country comparisons Mean number of coded secondary diagnoses varies greatly across countries (even with similar number of fields) and may be a major source of bias in cross-country comparison; adjustment techniques may reduce this bias

2011 recommendations to OECD HCQI program Consider procedure-linked or procedure-stratified indicators for future work More consistent coding across hospitals and areas Reduce bias due to variation in risk across countries Different countries use different procedure classification systems, requiring more mapping effort to ensure comparability Postoperative wound dehiscence Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma Postoperative respiratory failure Iatrogenic pneumothorax Postoperative metabolic derangement (renal failure)

Validation findings in USA Medical record review as gold standard Name VA AHRQ UHC PPV (%) Sample PPV (%) (95% Sample PPV (%) Sample (95% CI) (n)* CI) (n) (95% CI) (n) Decubitus Ulcer 30 (22-40) 112 -- -- 32 (30-35) 2035 Foreign Body Left in During Procedure 46 (36-55) 93 -- -- -- -- Iatrogenic Pneumothorax 73 (64-81) 112 78 (73-82) 205 -- -- Central Venous Catheter-related 38 (29-47) 112 61 (51-71) 191 -- -- Bloodstream Infections Postoperative Hip Fracture 28 (15-43) 46 -- -- -- -- Postoperative Hemorrhage or 75 (66-83) 112 93 181 -- -- Hematoma 78 (62-95) Postoperative Physiologic and Metabolic Derangements 63 (54-72) 119 * 85 (78-90) 94 -- -- Postoperative Respiratory Failure 67 (57-76) 112 -- 83 (77-89) 609 Postoperative PE or DVT 43 (34-53) 112 47 (42-52) 121 44 (37-51) 452 Postoperative Sepsis 53 (42-64) 112 41 (28-54) 164 -- -- Postoperative Wound Dehiscence 87 (79-92) 112 -- -- -- -- Accidental Puncture or Laceration 85 (77-91) 112 91 (86-94) 249 -- -- Note that procedure-linked or stratified indicators (in bold) tend to have high PPV

Validation findings in USA: POA reporting Percentage reported as NOT POA (%) PSI/PDI NACHRI Mich CA NY Mayo PSI 1: Complications of Anesthesia 100 100 100 94 PSI 3: Decubitus Ulcer 60 42 11 14 18 PSI 5: Foreign Body Left During Proc 80 80 64 76 54 PSI 6: Iatrogenic Pneumothorax 89 100 73 65 78 PSI 7: Infection Due To Medical Care 57 36 65 65 60 PSI 8: Postop Hip Fracture 0 21 26 22 PSI 9: Postop Hemorrhage or Hematoma 97 100 79 71 87 PSI 10: Postop Physiologic or Metabolic 91 77 64 46 PSI 11: Postop Respiratory Failure 83 100 94 93 74 PSI 12: Postop DVT or PE 67 46 43 40 PSI 13: Postoperative Sepsis 60 60 73 70 76 PSI 14: Postop Wound Dehiscence 90 100 PSI 15: Accidental Puncture/Laceration 93 84 87 87 85 PSI 16: Transfusion Reaction 71 N/A 58 78 50 Procedure-linked and stratified PSIs (highlighted) are unlikely to be present on admission.

Obstetric trauma (PSI 18/19): validation findings California Obstetric Validation Study (Romano et al., 2005): Stratified random cluster sample of 1,662 records from 52 hospitals (51% vaginal) Sensitivity=90% (95% CI, 82-96%) and PPV=90-95% Adjusted sensitivity=93% (95% CI, 82-97%) and PPV=73% Clinical research data set (Brubaker et al. 2007): 393 indicator-positive and 383 indicator-negative vaginal deliveries Sensitivity=77% (95% CI, 72-81%) Specificity=99.7% (95% CI, 98.5-99.4%) PPV could not be estimated due to the sampling design, but should be approximately 93% given a typical prevalence of 5% English NHS study (Bottle and Aylin, 2008): 955 cases from 18 English NHS trusts sampled PPV=85% (none present at admission, 15% miscoded)

PSI 12: Postoperative DVT/PE after TKA Follow-up study of PPV in 15 academic centers Chart Abstraction 125 cases True Positive postop lower ext DVT or PE 126 VTE flagged by PSI 12 (+4 Readmission) 1 case clinical False Positive (superficial) saphenous Vein Positive Predictive Value = TP / (TP + FP) = 0.992 Overall updated PPV from 7 volunteer hospitals = 126/156 = 81% Most FPs due to acute preoperative events (19) or miscoded location of DVT (10)

PSI 12: Postoperative DVT/PE after TKA Follow-up study of NPV in 15 academic centers Chart Abstraction 3 cases False Negative 5 cases had VTE per UHC abstract 463 Not flagged as VTE by PSI 12 2 cases superficial or upper extremity thromboses 458 cases had no VTE (TN) Negative Predictive Value = TN / (FN + TN) = 458 / (458+3) = 0.993 Previous sensitivity estimate from 33 teaching hospitals: 96% (95% CI: 86-100%) 100% if limited to acute DVT or PE

PSI 6: Iatrogenic pneumothorax Overall PPV 73% (VA) or 78% (nonfederal) FPs due to inadequate documentation, such as rule out pneumothorax without alternative diagnosis established after study (CXR or CT) Most TPs related to failure to use bedside ultrasound guidance during placement of central venous catheters, especially in the OR, ICU, and ED (proven to reduce iatrogenic injury during IJ/SC vein placement)

2003 Q2 (N=2969) 2003 Q4 (N=4439) 2004 Q2 (N=4533) 2004 Q4 (N=4474) 2005 Q2 (N=4615) 2005 Q4 (N=5010) 2006 Q2 (N=5139) 2006 Q4 (N=5063) 2007 Q2 (N=5195) 2007 Q4* (N=5164) Case study: Iatrogenic pneumothorax One hospital s experience recognizing and responding 3.5 AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Rate per 1000 Observed Target UHC Median 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0

Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Data Note that this hospital was able to reduce its IP rate well below the median for teaching hospitals (UHC) and to achieve benchmark/target performance.

PSI 9: Postoperative Hemorrhage/Hematoma Screens for hemorrhage or hematoma requiring operative treatment following a surgical procedure 31 hospitals from 11 states participated N=181 flagged and N=281 unflagged records PPV = 78% (95% CI 62-95%) or 93% from coding alone NPV = 99.7% (98.9-99.9%) Sensitivity = 49% (26-72%) Specificity = 99.9% (99.7-100%) Sensitivity was improved to 87% by adding certain procedure codes to indicator denominator Specification of diagnosis codes as postoperative may improve PPV in some versions of ICD-10

PSI 10: Postoperative Physiologic or Metabolic Derangement Screens for acute kidney injury requiring dialysis and diabetes-related coma, ketoacidosis, or hyperosmolarity after elective surgical procedure 35 hospitals from 11 States participated N=94 flagged and N=230 unflagged records PPV = 84.9% (95% CI 78.0-91.9%) NPV = 98.7% (97.3-100.0%) Sensitivity = 96.3% (90.4-100.0%) Specificity = 94.2% (86.2-100.0%) Problem: requires way to identify elective surgery or diagnoses present on admission

Hospital-level Pediatric Quality Indicators (PDIs) Indicator name Panel recommendations Internal QI Comp Report Tailored Risk Adjustment or Stratification Accidental puncture and laceration Acceptable (-) No Number and type of procedures, MDC Decubitus ulcer Acceptable (-) Acceptable (-) High risk group Foreign body left in after procedure Acceptable (+) Acceptable (+) Too rare Iatrogenic pneumothorax in neonates Acceptable (+) Acceptable (-) Iatrogenic pneumothorax, non-neonates Acceptable (+) Acceptable (-) Pediatric heart surgery mortality Acceptable (+) Acceptable (+) Specialized risk adjustment with RACHS-1 System (Jenkins et al) Pediatric heart surgery volume Acceptable (+) Acceptable (+) Postoperative hemorrhage/hematoma Acceptable (+) Acceptable (+) High risk (coagulopathy) Postoperative respiratory failure Acceptable (+) Acceptable (-) Postoperative sepsis Acceptable (-) No High risk, intermediate risk (complex) Postoperative wound dehiscence Acceptable (+) Acceptable (+) Selected infection due to medical care Acceptable (-) No High risk, intermediate risk (complex) Transfusion reaction Acceptable (+) Acceptable (-) Too rare Highlighted PDIs are closely related to existing OECD PSIs.

National Association of Children s Hospitals and Related Institutions (USA) assessment of PDI preventability N reviewed Preventable Uncertain PDI 1: Accidental Puncture/Laceration 247 32% 36% PDI 2: Decubitus Ulcer 138 51 28 PDI 3: Foreign Body Left During Procedure 45 44 36 PDI 4: Iatrogenic Pneumothorax (neonates) 10 10 10 PDI 5: Iatrogenic Pneumothorax (nonneonates) 148 29 35 PDI 8: Postop Hemorrhage or Hematoma 140 13 44 PDI 9: Postop Respiratory Failure 108 14 26 PDI 10: Postoperative Sepsis 133 26 41 PDI 11: Postop Wound Dehiscence 44 34 41 PDI 12: Infection Due To Medical Care 145 40 41 PDI 13: Transfusion Reaction 5 0 20 Scanlon MC, et al. Pediatrics 2008; 121:e1723-e1731. Highlighted PDIs were judged <50% non-preventable.

Recommendations for consideration Exclude indicators that require present on admission (POA) coding or exclusion of nonelective cases Postoperative physiologic or metabolic derangement Postoperative respiratory failure To minimize burden on countries, treat pediatric indicators as a separate stratum within corresponding adult indicators

Recommendations for consideration Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma* Postoperative wound dehiscence* Add pediatric stratification of Accidental puncture or laceration Consider pediatric stratification of Retained surgical item or unretrieved device fragment (new name for Foreign body left in) Consider Iatrogenic pneumothorax* High PPV and preventability, but potential coding problem due to variable coding instructions in different countries using ICD-10 * Include adult/pediatric stratification

Reminder These indicators may still be susceptible to bias due to variation in coding intensity across hospitals Recommend continuing to collect data on mean number of secondary diagnoses among cases at risk (denominator) for adjustment

Postoperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis, 2009 Source: OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Data 2011 (OECD).