Preliminary 6-month results of VMI-CFA trial

Similar documents
How to perform CFA Supera deployment. Koen Deloose, MD Head Dept Vascular Surgery AZ Sint Blasius Dendermonde, Belgium

Surgical Bypass vs. Zilver PTX stent for long SFA lesions : Interim results of the ZilverPass Trial

Or is the ivolution stent a better alternative? EVOLUTION 12-month data

Treating in-stent occlusions with the Rotarex catheter : The ROBINSON study

BIOLUX 4EVER : Combining Passeo-18 Lux DCB and Pulsar-18 BMS : 12 month results of full cohort

Surgical Bypass or. Zilver PTX. 12 months preliminary data. LINC 2016, Leipzig. Marc Bosiers, MD. Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

PES BTK 70 : 12 m results with a paclitaxelcoated self-expanding stent in BTK arteries

RELINE-trial : 24 months results with the Viabahn vs PTA for in-stent restenosis

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions

DCB + stent in the SFA

12-Month and preliminary 24-month outcomes of combining a DCB with a modern generation of nitinol stent in fem-pop lesions. BIOLUX 4EVER study

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

Combination therapy : treatment rationale and clinical evidence

Endovascular Therapy vs. Open Femoral Endarterectomy Rationale and Design of the Randomized PESTO Trial

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions Preliminary report

A randomized comparison of endovascular versus surgery treatment of common femoral artery disease: Results from the TECCO trial

The BATTLE Trial Comparing Bare Metal to Drug Eluting Stents for Intermediate Length Lesions of the SFA

Is stenting a safe and durable option in the common femoral artery?

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

Update in femoral angioplasty & stenting PRO

Long-term Zilver PTX Data from Japan: 5-year Results in the Real World

Angiographic dissection pattern and patency outcomes of post balloon angioplasty for SFA lesions -a retrospective multi center analysis-

Preliminary 12 Months results of the RAPID trial

Does stent design influence the results of SFA stenting?

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Accurate Vessel Sizing Drives Clinical Results. IVUS In the Periphery

The Crack and Pave technique for highly resistant calcified lesions. Manuela Matschuck MD University Hospital Leipzig Department Angiology

The present status of selfexpanding. for CLI: Why and when to use. Sean P Lyden MD Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Future of stenting in the. Koen Deloose, MD Head Dept Vascular Surgery AZ Sint Blasius Dendermonde, Belgium

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Comparison Of Primary Long Stenting Versus Primary Short Stenting For Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease (PARADE)

Koen Keirse, MD RZ Tienen, Belgium

a physician-initiated study investigating the RoadSaver stent in carotid lesions Dr. Michel Bosiers

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

Aggressive BTK Revascularization and Advanced Wound Care - Patient Specific Therapy Concepts

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

Zilver PTX Post-Market Surveillance Study of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Treating Femoropopliteal Artery Disease in Japan: 24-Month Results

VIRTUS: Trial Design and Primary Endpoint Results

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Specificities for infrapopliteal stents

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

Atherectomy: Jetstream and Directional. George S. Chrysant, M.D.

Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty. Thomas Zeller MD Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg & Bad Krozingen, Germany

Is there still any space left for DES in the BTK area??? (Angiolite BTK trial, 6 month Data)

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

2-YEAR DATA SUPERA POPLITEAL REAL WORLD

Forget about the angiosome theories. Yann Gouëffic, MD, PhD Department of vascular surgery, institut du thorax, Nantes, France

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

REACT Treatment Rationale and Clinical Evidence. ICI Meeting 5th of December 2017

Plaque scoring in calcified lesions

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Safety and Feasibility of Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Common Femoral Artery Stenoses

Comparing endoluminal bypass to open fem-pop bypasses; Final 1-year results of the SUPERB trial

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA

Treatment Strategies for Long Lesions of greater than 20 cm

Clinical use and safety of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of BTK: interim data from a prospective registry

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

Pulsar stent technology

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

Excimer Laser angioplasty for femoro-popliteal disease. Sendai Kousei Hospital, Tokyo Kamata Hospital Naoto Inoue MD, FSCAI, FJCC, FAHA

Hybrid Procedures for Peripheral Obstructive Disease - Step by Step -

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Endovascular Should Be Considered First Line Therapy

SAVER: Rationale and merits for an all-comers DCB e-registry Frank Vermassen MD

Management of In-stent Restenosis after Lower Extremity Endovascular Procedures

Massimiliano Fusaro, MD on behalf of ISAR-STATH Investigators. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München Munich - Germany

The role of bioabsorbable stents in the superficial femoral artery What is going on? Frank Vermassen Ghent University Hospital Belgium

Device Evolution. Atherectomy: Where Do We Stand After 12 Years Since FDA Clearance. Where Do We Stand? 4/18/2015

OCT Guided Atherectomy: Initial Results of the VISION Trial Using the Pantheris Catheter. Patrick Muck, MD

The Supera stent In retrograde vascular access for SFA ostium treatment: The SUPRA-FAST Registry

Photoablation and DCB in in-stent restenosis

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

The Freeway Stent Study: the 12 Months results highly favor the use of DEB in combination with stenting

IN.PACT AV Access IDE Study Full Baseline Data. Robert Lookstein, MD MHCDL New York, NY On Behalf of the IN.PACT AV ACCESS Investigators

DCB level 1 evidence review

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

Vessel preparation with scoring balloons prior to DCB or stenting

Cutting/scoring balloon Cryoplasty Drug-eluting balloon Brachytherapy Debulking Restent (BMS or DES) John R. Laird, MD

On behalf of the DURABILITY Investigators:

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

Does heparin impregnated graft improve patency and reduce the cost of lower limb bypass? The REPLACE trial Y. Gouëffic, MD, PhD

BIOFLEX PEACE Registry

SFA CTO Lesion Management laser or directional atherectomy?

Transcription:

Preliminary 6-month results of VMI-CFA trial Koen Deloose, MD Head Vascular Surgery, AZ Sint Blasius, Dendermonde, Belgium

Disclosure slide Speaker name: Koen Deloose, MD I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Consulting: Medtronic, Spectranetics, Biotronik, Abbott, Bard, ivascular, Bentley, Cook, GE Healthcare, Terumo, Boston Scientific, Contego Medical, Cardionovum Employment in industry Stockholder of a healthcare company Owner of a healthcare company Other(s) I do not have any potential conflict of interest 2

Among vascular surgeons, the common femoral artery remains one of the last areas of open reconstructive surgery NO ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY FOR THIS BABY And there are good arguments in support of such near-religion Criado F. Blog in Vascular Disease Management 2017 3

there are good arguments in support of such near-religion Easy/Safe accessible for surgery High flexion zone Location prone to crush Bulky, eccentric, heavily calcified plaques Superb long-term (5-10yr) patencies (>90%) (surgical/endovascular) access area Frequently femoral bifurcation involvement 4

there are good arguments in support of such near-religion Easy/Safe accessible for surgery High flexion zone Superb long-term (5-10yr) patencies (>90%) 5

there are good arguments in support of such near-religion High flexion zone Easy/Safe accessible for surgery Ballotta et al. (Surgery 2010;147:268-274) 6,6% minor complication rate Mainly Superb lymphlong-term leaks (5-10yr) patencies (>90%) Kang et al. (J Vasc Surg 2008;48:872-7) 13,8% complication rate 5% required reintervention Kechagias et al. (World J Surg 2008;32:51-54) 17,1% wound infection rate 9% hematomas Derksen et al. (Vasc End Surg 2009;43:69-75) 14% wound infection rate 9% superficial infections, 5% deep infections Cardon et al. (Ann Chir 2001;126(8):777-82) 18% minor complication rate 3,6% major complication rate 6

there are good arguments in support of such near-religion Ballotta et al. (Surgery 2010;147:268-274) 8 yr single center, prospective study, 117 pts PPR @ 1, 3, 5 & 7 yrs: 100%, 99%, 96%, 96% APP: 100% - LSR: 100% Kang et al. (J Vasc Surg 2008;48:872-7) 5 yr single center, prospective study, 58 pts PPR @ 1 & 5 yrs: 93%, 91% High flexion zone APP: 100% Kechagias et al. (World J Surg 2008;32:51-54) 15 yr single center, prospective study, 111 pts PPR: na-lsr @ 5, 10, 15 yrs: 93,7%, 93,7%, 85,2% f-tlr @ 5, 10, 15 yrs: 68%, 50,6%, 42,5% Easy/Safe accessible for surgery Superb long-term (5-10yr) patencies (>90%) 7

there are good arguments in support of such near-religion Location prone to crush (surgical/endovascular) access area Bulky, eccentric, heavily calcified plaques 8

there are good arguments in support of such near-religion Frequently femoral bifurcation involvement 9

So the CFA-area is ripe for (tailored) endovascular penetration 10

So the CFA-area is ripe for (tailored) endovascular penetration Dpt Vascular Surgery, Leicester, UK. Davies R et al. Vasc EndoVasc Surg 2013 ; 47(8) ; 639-644 11

So the CFA-area is ripe for (tailored) endovascular penetration Bonvini R et al. JACC 2011, 58 (8) ; 792-8 12

So the CFA-area is ripe for (tailored) endovascular penetration Gouëffic Y et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017 Jul 10(13):1344-1354 13

So the CFA-area is ripe for (tailored) endovascular penetration VMI-CFA Physician initiated, prospective, multicenter, single arm trial to evaluate the Supera Peripheral Vascular Mimetic Implant Device (Abbott Vascular) for symptomatic (RB 2-4) CFA disease treatment OLV Hospital, Aalst AZ Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde ZNA, Antwerp Imelda, Bonheiden CHU, Nantes Clinique Rhône-Durance, Avignon CHU, Clermont-Ferrand 1 3 4 5 13 27 47 0 10 20 30 40 50 14

VMI-CFA trial : Endpoints Primary endpoint Efficacy endpoint : Primary patency @12 months (DUS PSVR < 2,5) (Core lab adjudicated) in CFA, SFA & DFA with no reintervention Safety endpoint : periprocedural adverse events up to 30 days post procedure Secondary endpoints Technical success rate (angiographical RS<30%) Primary patency @ 6 months (same definition) Freedom from TLR @ 6 & 12 months Clinical success : defined as improvement in RB classification 15

VMI-CFA trial : In/Ex-clusion criteria Inclusion RB 2-4 classification De novo/post POBA lesions stenosis >50%/occlusions Patent DFA Good SFA run off Exclusion RB 5-6 classification In-stent lesions CFA Previous surgery CFA occluded DFA/SFA Non treatable inflow lesion thrombus Debulking, DE technologies Azéma L. et al. EJVEVS, 41, 6 : June 2011 ; 787-793 16

VMI-CFA trial : Timeline screen proc disch 1 M 6 M 12 M Patient informed consent In- / exclusion criteria check Medical / clinical history Medication Physical examination Rutherford ABI Regular Angiography Regular Duplex Ultrasound Core Lab Duplex Ultrasound Adverse Events 17

VMI-CFA trial : demographics N = 100 out of 100 Male (%) 81 (81%) Age (min-max ± SD) 72,72 (46,87-95,76 ± 8,59) Rutherford Classification 1 20 21 * Nicotine (%) 29 (29%) Hypertension (%) 78 (78%) Diabetes (%) 35 (35%) Renal insufficiency (%) 14 (14%) Hypercholesterolemia (%) 62 (62%) Obesity (%) 25 (25%) Claudicant 79 (79%) CLI patient 21 (21%) 58 2 3 4 5 * Protocol deviation 18

VMI-CFA trial : lesion characteristics N = 100 out of 100 Lesion length (min-max ± SD) 44,17mm (15mm 80mm ± 15,67) Ref vessel diameter (min-max ± SD) 7,29mm (5mm 9mm ± 0,93mm) Degree of stenosis (min-max ± SD) 82,6% (60% - 100% ± 10,65%) Occlusion (%) 11 (11%) Calcified lesion (%) 82 (82%) Azéma classification II (%) 52% Azéma classification III (%) 47% 19

VMI-CFA trial : Procedure Procedure time (min-max ± SD) Scopy time (min-max ± SD) Contrast (min-max ± SD) N = 100 out of 100 55,68min (15min 150min ± 29,59min) 14,64min (4min 55min ± 9,93min) 82,54ml (10ml 353ml ± 75,08ml) Femoral access (%) 92 (92%) Cross-over performed (%) 82 (89,13%) Inflow lesion (%) 23 (23%) Outflow lesion (%) 62 (62%) 20

VMI-CFA trial : Procedure N = 100 out of 100 Predilatation performed (%) 100 (100%) Diameter predilatation balloon (min-max ± SD) 7,10mm (3mm 9mm ± 1,22mm) Length predilatation balloon (min-max ± SD) 7,29mm 50,53mm (20mm 200mm ± 31,65mm) # supera used 102 1 stent received (%) 98 (98%) 2 stents received (%) 2 (2%) Diameter stent (min-max ± SD) Length stent (min-max ± SD) 6,48mm (5mm 8mm ± 0,79mm) 49,02mm (20mm 100mm ± 16,32mm) Postdilatation performed (%) 83 (83%) Diameter postdilatation balloon (min-max ± SD) Length postdilatation balloon (min-max ± SD) 7,43mm (5mm 10mm ± 1,06mm) 50mm (20mm 200mm ± 25,79mm) 21

VMI-CFA trial : primary patency 100% time baseline 1MFU (30 days) 6MFU* (180 days) 6MFU* (210 days) at risk 100 100 94 58 % 100 100 100 100 * Data from 1 patient missing 22

VMI-CFA trial : f-tlr 100% time baseline 1MFU (30 days) 6MFU* (180 days) 6MFU* (210 days) at risk 100 100 94 58 % 100 100 100 100 * Data from 1 patient missing 23

VMI-CFA trial : Survival Rate 96,9% 95,9% time baseline 1MFU (30 days) 6MFU* (180 days) 6MFU* (210 days) at risk 100 100 94 58 % 100 100 96,9% 95,9% * Data from 1 patient missing 24

VMI-CFA trial : clinical success Rutherford category 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Screening 1MFU 6MFU 5 * 1 0 0 4 20 1 0 3 58 0 1 2 21 2 2 1 0 4 6 0 0 83 79 ** 0 1 2 3 4 5 * Protocol deviation ** Data from 1 patient missing 25

VMI-CFA trial : Safety outcomes Primary safety endpoint 30 days Device or procedure related death (N) 0 CD-TVR (N) 0 Target limb major amputation (N) 0 MAEs 180 days 210 days Death (N) 3 4 CD-TVR (N) 0 0 Target limb major amputation (N) 0 0 Thrombosis (N) 0 0 26

Conclusion In 2018, although CFE still remains the golden standard, the historical no endovascular for this baby -statement is wrong. There are some indicative papers, the randomized TECCO trial included, that there is definitely a place for safer and as-efficient endovascular therapy in CFA Newer generation of devices, like the high crush resistant, repuncturable Supera stent, are facilitating this treatment With this particular device, the VMI-CFA trial shows excellent short term results (6m) with 100% PP- and f-tlr rates, clear clinical benefit & 100% safety profile 27

Preliminary 6-month results of VMI-CFA trial Koen Deloose, MD Head Vascular Surgery, AZ Sint Blasius, Dendermonde, Belgium