SCBT-MR 2015 LungRADS : Basics

Similar documents
SCBT-MR 2016 Lung Cancer Screening in Practice: State of the Art

SCBT-MR 2015 Incidentaloma on Chest CT

Learning Objectives. 1. Identify which patients meet criteria for annual lung cancer screening

Current Approach to Screening for Lung Cancer. James R Jett M.D.

Screening Programs background and clinical implementation. Denise R. Aberle, MD Professor of Radiology and Engineering

The Maine Lung Cancer Coalition. Working Together to Reduce Lung Cancer in Maine

PULMONARY NODULES DETECTED INCIDENTALLY OR BY SCREENING: LOTS OF GUIDELINES BUT WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?

CLINICAL GUIDELINES. Lung-Cancer Screening Program Guidelines Robert Y. Kanterman, M.D. and Thomas J. Gilbert, M.D., M.P.P.

SHARED DECISION MAKING AND LUNG CANCER SCREENING

PULMONARY NODULES AND MASSES : DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH AND NEW MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES.

Approach to Pulmonary Nodules

GUIDELINES FOR PULMONARY NODULE MANAGEMENT : RECENT CHANGES AND UPDATES

Lung Cancer Screening

Published Pulmonary Nodule Guidelines A Synthesis

CT Screening for Lung Cancer for High Risk Patients

Lung Cancer Screening: To Screen or Not to Screen?

Pulmonary Nodules & Masses

Pulmonary Nodules. Michael Morris, MD

Lung Cancer Screening:

Lung Cancer Risk Associated With New Solid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial

Lung Cancer Screening

The status of Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines. Peter B. Bach, MD, MAPP Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Lung Cancer Screening: To screen or not to screen?

Lung Cancer Screening

Example of lung screening

CT Lung Screening Implementation Challenges: State Based Initiatives

Lung Cancer Screening: Who, What, Why? Myths Dispelled

LUNG NODULES: MODERN MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Pulmonary Nodules: When to worry, when to chill. Douglas Arenberg Associate Professor Pulmonary & Critical Care

I9 COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS

Objectives. Why? Why? Background 11/5/ % incurable disease at presentation Locally advanced disease Metastasis. 14% 5 year survival

Role of CT in Lung Cancer Screening: 2010 Stuart S. Sagel, M.D.

Rodney C Richie MD FACP FCCP DBIM Texas Life and EMSI

None

Evidence based approach to incidentally detected subsolid pulmonary nodule. DM SEMINAR July 27, 2018 Harshith Rao

Lung Cancer Screening Trials. Edward Harris Respiratory Research Fellow Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

Chest Radiology Interpretation: Findings of Tuberculosis

UW Radiology Review Course Breast Calcifications. BI-RADS 5 th Edition

LUNG CANCER SCREENING: LUNG CANCER SCREENING: THE TIME HAS COME LUNG CANCER: A NATIONAL EPIDEMIC

Pulmonologist s Perspective

Disclosures CORONARY CALCIUM SCORING REVISITED. Learning Objectives. Scoring Methods. Consultant for M2S, Inc. Coronary Calcium Scoring: Software

Imaging in breast cancer. Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since

Screening for Lung Cancer: New Guidelines, Old Problems

Ultralow Dose Chest CT with MBIR

Christine Argento, MD Interventional Pulmonology Emory University

Lung Cancer Screening: Evidence and current recommendations

A Comprehensive Cancer Center Designated by the National Cancer Institute

10/17/16. Lung Cancer Screening. Question 1: Does lung cancer screening make sense? 3rd lung cancer third most prevalent tumor type

Lung Screening: Do s and Don t s

Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management

VA PARTNERSHIP Increase ACCESS to LUNG SCREENING

Implementation & optimization of a lung cancer screening CT program. Presented by Izabella Barreto at the 2016 Florida AAPM Chapter Meeting

Lung Cancer screening :

Lung Cancer Screening: Benefits and limitations to its Implementation

Veterans Health Administration Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project: Results & Lessons Learned

I8 COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS

Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):

The Spectrum of Management of Pulmonary Ground Glass Nodules

Disclosures. Overview. Selection the most accurate statement: Updates in Lung Cancer Screening 5/26/17. No Financial Disclosures

Lung Cancer Diagnosis for Primary Care

New Paradigms in Predicting CVD Risk

Lung Cancer Screening Computed Tomography Screening in Pa6ents at Risk for Lung Cancer

Case-based discussion:

MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

DISCLOSURE. Lung Cancer Screening: The End of the Beginning. Learning Objectives. Relevant Financial Relationship(s) Off Label Usage

What to know and what to make of it

BI-RADS Update. Martha B. Mainiero, MD, FACR, FSBI Brown University Rhode Island Hospital

Abstract Submission Form

DOH LUNG CANCER SCREENING SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS

Deep Learning, Lung Cancer Screening & the Data Science Bowl 2017

LUNG CANCER SCREENING: ON WHOM DID YOU DO IT AND ON WHOM DO YOU RESPOND TO THE RESULTS?

Amammography report is a key component of the breast

American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria

An Update on Lung Cancer Screening Policy and the Role of Quitlines

Lung Cancer Screening in the Midwest of the US: When Histoplasmosis Complicates the Picture

Lung Cancer Screening: A review of the recommendations Friday, November 11th, 2016 from 11:45 to 12:15. Dr. Tunji Fatoye Dr.

Leonard M. Glassman MD

International Early Lung Cancer Action Program: Screening Protocol PI: Claudia I. Henschke, PhD, MD New York, New York

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Lung cancer Screening

VHA Demonstration Project for Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Chest CT Screening

Robert J. McKenna M.D. Chief, Thoracic Surgery Cedars Sinai Medical Center

LUNG CANCER SCREENING WHAT S THE IMPACT? Nitra Piyavisetpat, MD Department of Radiology Chulalongkorn University

LUNG CANCER continues to rank as the leading cause

C2 COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS

CT Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening. Part I. Journey to LDCT LCS Program

LUNG CANCER SCREENING

Equity Issues with Lung Cancer Screening Prevent Cancer - Quantitative Imaging Workshop November 5-6, 2018 Alexandria, VA

Breast Imaging Lexicon

Capturing Data Elements and the Role of Imaging Informatics

CT Lung Screening Implementation Challenges: ALA/ATS Implementation Microsite

Lung Cancer Screening: Current Status

Lung Cancer Screening and COPD Update

Lung Cancer Screening. Eric S. Papierniak, DO NF/SG VHA UF Health

SCREENING FOR EARLY LUNG CANCER. Pang Yong Kek

The solitary pulmonary nodule: Assessing the success of predicting malignancy

National Lung Screening Trial Results

Lung Cancer Screening Benefits, Risks & Challenges

Goals of Presentation

NCCN Guidelines as a Model of Extended Criteria for Lung Cancer Screening

Transcription:

SCBT-MR 2015 LungRADS : Basics Reginald F. Munden MD, DMD, MBA I have no conflicts of interest to report

National Lung Cancer Screening Trial 20% lung cancer mortality reduction 6.9% all cause mortality reduction 320 individuals to save 1 from lung cancer death

NLST 24% of all screens - called positive study T0-27%, T1-28%, T2-17% 96% of positive studies - false positive At least one positive study in participant: CT 39%; CXR 16% Complications: 0.4% CT; 1.6% CXR 16 deaths (within 60 days) of CT (10 lung cancer) False negative - missed rate? NLST Research Team. NEJM, 2011

Lung Cancer Screening: Standardized lung nodule identification ACR LungRADS

ACR LungRADS Category Descriptor Category Descriptor Primary Category Incomplete - 0 Negative No nodules & definitely benign nodules 1 Management Additional lung cancer screening CT images and/or comparison to prior chest CT examinations is needed Benign Appearance or Behavior Nodules with a very low likelihood of becoming a clinically active cancer due to size or lack of growth 2 Continue annual screening with LDCT in 12 months Probably Benign Probably benign finding(s) - short term follow up suggested; includes nodules with a low likelihood of becoming a clinically active cancer 3 6 month LDCT 4A 3 month LDCT; PET/CT may be used when there is a 8 mm solid component Suspicious Findings for which additional diagnostic testing and/or tissue sampling is recommended 4B Chest CT, PET/CT and/or biopsy-depending on *probability of malignancy and comorbidities.

ACR LUNG-RADS Category Category Descriptor Category Findings Management Probability of Malignancy Estimated Population Prevalence Negative No nodules and definitely benign nodules 1 no lung nodules nodule(s) with specific calcifications: complete, central, popcorn, concentric rings and fat containing nodules Benign Appearance or Behavior Nodules with a very low likelihood of becoming a clinically active cancer due to size or lack of growth 2 solid nodule(s): < 6 mm new < 4 mm part solid nodule(s): < 6 mm total diameter on baseline screening non solid nodule(s) (GGN): < 20 mm OR 20 mm and unchanged or slowly growing Continue annual screening with LDCT in 12 months < 1% 90% category 3 or 4 nodules unchanged for 3 months Probably Benign Probably benign finding(s) - short term follow up suggested; includes nodules with a low likelihood of becoming a clinically active cancer 3 solid nodule(s): 6 to < 8 mm at baseline OR new 4 mm to < 6 mm part solid nodule(s): 6 mm total diameter with solid component < 6 mm OR new < 6 mm total diameter non solid nodule(s) (GGN) 20 mm on baseline CT or new 6 month LDCT 1-2% 5%

ACR LungRADS Category 4 Category Category Descriptor Category Findings Management Probability of Malignancy Estimated Population Prevalence Solid nodule(s): 8 to < 15 mm at baseline OR growing < 8 mm OR new 6 to < 8 mm 3 month LDCT; 4A Part solid nodule(s): 6 mm with solid component 6 mm to < 8 mm OR PET/CT may be used when there is a 8 mm solid component 5-15% 2% Suspicious Findings for which additional diagnostic testing and/or tissue sampling is recommended 4B 4X with a new or growing < 4 mm solid component Endobronchial nodule Solid nodule(s) 15 mm OR new or growing, and 8 mm Part solid nodule(s) with: a solid component 8 mm OR a new or growing 4 mm solid component Category 3 or 4 nodules with additional features or imaging findings that increases the suspicion of malignancy Chest CT with or without contrast; PET/CT and/or tissue sampling depending on the *probability of malignancy and comorbidities; PET/CT may be used when there is a 8 mm solid component. > 15% 2%

Baseline 3 months follow-up 4A Management

4A - Solid Nodule Findings > 8 to < 15mm at baseline Growing < 8mm or New 6 to < 8mm Endobronchial nodule Management: 3 month LDCT PET/CT if solid component is > 8mm

Follow up 3 months PET/CT 4A Solid > 8mm to < 15mm at baselline

4A: Growing < 8m One year

4A Endobronchial

Category 4A Part-solid Nodule Category Category Descriptor Category Findings Management Probability of Malignancy Estimated Population Prevalence Suspicious Findings for which additional diagnostic testing and/or tissue sampling is recommended 4A Part solid nodule(s): 6 mm with solid component 6mm to < 8 mm OR with a new or growing < 4 mm solid component 3 month LDCT; PET/CT may be used when there is a 8 mm solid component 5-15% 2%

Findings: > 6 mm with solid component > 6mm to < 8mm or with a new or growing < 4mm solid component Management: 3 month LDCT PET/CT if solid component is > 8mm 4A Part Solid Nodule

New < 4mm Solid Component 4A Part Solid Nodule

Category 4B Solid Nodule Category Category Descriptor Category Findings Management Suspicious Findings for which additional diagnostic testing and/or tissue sampling is recommended 4B Solid nodule(s) 15 mm OR new or growing, and 8 mm Chest CT with or without contrast; PET/CT and/or tissue sampling depending on the *probability of malignancy and comorbidities; PET/CT may be used when there is a 8 mm solid component. Probability of Malignancy Estimated Population Prevalence > 15% 2%

4B Solid Nodule Findings > 15mm at baseline or New or growing, and > 8mm Management Chest CT w/ or w/o contrast PET/CT and/or tissue sampling depending on probability of malignancy

4B - Growing and > 8mm

Category 4B Part-Solid Nodule Category Category Descriptor Category Findings Management Probability of Malignancy Estimated Population Prevalence Suspicious Findings for which additional diagnostic testing and/or tissue sampling is recommended 4B Part solid nodule(s) with: a solid component 8 mm OR a new or growing 4 mm solid component Chest CT with or without contrast; PET/CT and/or tissue sampling depending on the *probability of malignancy and comorbidities; PET/CT may be used when there is a 8 mm solid component. > 15% 2%

4B New > 8mm solid

4B Growing Solid Component

4x Category Category Descriptor Category Findings Management Probability of Malignancy Estimated Population Prevalence Chest CT with or without contrast; Suspicious Findings for which additional diagnostic testing and/or tissue sampling is recommended 4X Category 3 or 4 nodules with additional features or imaging findings that increases the suspicion of malignancy PET/CT and/or tissue sampling depending on the *probability of malignancy and comorbidities; PET/CT may be used when there is a 8 mm solid component. > 15% 2% Increases the suspicion of malignancy: Spiculations, edge contours Hilar/central mass small cell cancer GGN doubles in size in 1 year Calcification

Findings Additional imaging features that increase the suspicion of malignancy: Spiculations, hilar/central mass, GGN doubles in size in 1 year Management Chest CT w/w/o contrast PET/CT and/or tissue sampling depending on probability of malignancy 4x - Other Stuff

4x Other suspicious

4B Management Factors Patient preference Probability of malignancy based on patient evaluation McWilliams Lung Cancer Risk Calculator

McWilliams Lung Cancer Risk Calculator

Category S and C Category Category Descriptor Category Findings Management Probability of Malignancy Estimated Population Prevalence Other Clinically Significant or Potentially Significant Findings (non-lung cancer) S Modifier - may add on to category 0 4 coding As appropriate to the specific findings n/a 10% Prior Lung Cancer Modifier for patients with a prior diagnosis of lung cancer who return to screening C Modifier may add on to category 0 4 coding

Coronary Artery Calcification as a Predictor of Morality in the NLST 1575 NLST CTs graded for CAC 210 CHD deaths, 315 all cause deaths, 1050 alive Agatston score, qualitative vessel, overall visual CAC classification HR overall assessment HR vessel-specific segments HR Agatston score None/0/0 1 1 1 Mild/1-5/1-100 2.30 1.88 1.38 Moderate/6-11/101-1,000 4.37 5.93 3.97 Heavy/12-30/>1,000 7.97 6.91 7.58 Chiles, et al. Radiology2014

Thank You Reginald F. Munden MD, DMD, MBA