The Iowa State Bar Association 2008 Judicial Plebiscite

Similar documents
DEATH ROW INMATES - STATUS REPORT Updated October 16, Court/Type of Proceeding

Best Lawyers. Stewart McKelvey

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed May 2, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Barbara H.

CRIJ 1301: INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE COURSE SYLLABUS

Using Social Science in Discrimination Lawsuit Development and Proof. Sarah E. Burns, Professor of Clinical Law NYU School of Law

National Demonstration of Courtroom 21

of Cross Examination Expert Witnesses Irving Younger s Ten Commandments 6/9/2017

Cancer case hinges on Hardell testimony Jeffrey Silva

TRIAL IS DIFFERENT Trial Practice Do s and Don ts. Joseph J. Popolizio Holly A. McGee April 20, 2018 Arizona Paralegal Association

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

Biol/Chem 4900/4912. Forensic Internship Lecture 2

Court of Common Pleas Schedule Docket 1/14/2019 through 1/18/2019

CONSENT AGENDA ACTION ITEM

Implicit Bias: A New Plaintiff Class Action Strategy First Wal-Mart and Iowa What is next?

KEY CONCEPTS AND BEST PRACTICES WHEN WORKING WITH INTERPRETERS

Statement and Return Report for Certification

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes Mellitus

Annual Meeting June Iowa Events Center Des Moines

Charles E. Steinberg Fellowship in Psychiatry and the Law. Introduction

Trial & Error: The Art of Persuasion in the Age of Neuroscience

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE DARRYL GENE WILLIAMS V. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

The Contribution of Missed Clinic Visits to Disparities in HIV Viral Load Outcomes

Descendants of Luigi Lobosco

Alex H. Krist, MD, MPH Vice Chairperson, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 5600 Fishers Lane Mail Stop 06E53A Rockville, MD 20857

1/18/2019 4:34 PM MAGNOLIA MUNICIPAL COURT DKSRPT Page: 1 Court Date: 1/22/ :30PM 1/22/ :30PM Preliminary

DONOR INFORMATION The papers were donated to the University of Missouri by Dr. Kenneth E. Pigg on 27 January 2006 (Accession No. 6102).

Are Missed- and Kept-Visits-Based Measures Capturing Different Aspects of Retention in Care?

Trial Preparation for Vocational Experts: A Defense Perspective

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. In the Matter of: ) ) S L. S ) OAH No PER ) Agency No DECISION

The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed October 14, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clayton County, Richard D.

Distinction between expert witness and expert testimony. Focus now is whether the testimony will be provided is expert testimony No need for the

(c) Center for Court Innovation. Procedural Justice: Fair Treatment Matters

Strategies for Recruiting Low- Income Minority Fathers into an Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE September 21, 2009 Session

Achieving effective remote participation using videoconferencing technology

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IT S IN THEIR CULTURE : FAIRNESS AND CULTURAL CONSIDERATIONS PHONE: X 116

RENDERED: January 30, 1998; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO. 96-CA WC CONNIE BEVINS CHAPMAN OPINION AFFIRMING ** ** ** ** ** ** **

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,298 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

06/28/2012 CIRCUIT COURT FOR CECIL COUNTY DOCKET REPORT

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

ROUND UP 2019 Operation Winter Blues

Handbook of Clinical Child Neuropsychology

Johns Hopkins University, 6 Health Resources and Services Administration, 7

REFERRAL RESOURCE GUIDE

Entry Level Assessment Blueprint Criminal Justice

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Trial Court No. CI Appellant Decided: August 8, 2008 * * * * *

Case 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 485 Filed 02/04/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

DSS RULES/MOTIONS 2:30 PM 5:00 PM

09:30AM K State of Maryland vs Thomas William Harris III Criminal Jury Trial 1 of 2 Parrack Close 03/30/13

Descendants of Harold Peter LIBBERTON (1 of 10)

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM OF THE TEXAS FORENSIC SCIENCE COMMISSION BRANDON LEE MOON INVESTIGATION

Establishing a Gender Bias Task Force

CASTLE HOWARD EVENT 2018

Archive of SID.

THE EFFECTS OF IMPLICIT BIAS ON THE PROSECUTION, DEFENSE, AND COURTS IN CRIMINAL CASES

Who Prevails in Special Education and Why?

MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE JAIL

Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes: Australian Sports Commission

Statement and Return Report for Certification

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes Mellitus

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel

Definitions. Courtroom Professionalism: Appropriate Courtroom Conduct. YFSF New Orleans LA 2/11/

Analyzing Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors and Proper Clinical Prescription of Statins. Peter Thorne

Analysing Judgments from a Feminist Perspective

5/11/2016. A Developmental Perspective

Stallion Stampede k Age Group Results

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fitness to Stand Trial

PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA FOR POLICE OFFICERS AND FIRST RESPONDERS: NEW COVERAGE UNDER THE WORKERS COMPENSATION LAW

What Law Can Learn from Social Science about Workplace Sexual Harassment

COACHING ETHICS CODE The USA Hockey Coaching Education Program is presented by

CLASSIC CRAFTSMANSHIP

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. -vs-

Psychology and Law. The State ofthe Discipline. Edited by. Ronald Roesch Stephen D. Hart. and. James R. P. Oglof f

CME Calendar Contact: Mary Starbuck, CME Coordinator, Phone: (330)

Burleson, Gary v. Doyle's Tire Service, Inc.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Bias Elimination in Forensic Science to Reduce Errors Act of 2016

Criminalization Creep : Legal developments and community responses to criminal prosecutions for HIV non-disclosure in Canada

MILTON HELPERN AWARD AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FORENSIC SCIENCES PATHOLOGY/BIOLOGY SECTION

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

OCTOBER 20, 2018 CITY OF KAMLOOPS GENERAL LOCAL ELECTION LIST OF CANDIDATES Last Updated: September 25, 2018

Follow this and additional works at:

Re: Consultation Paper: Improving the Structure of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants

Session Descriptions by Day and Room. Regency AB Ballroom. Regency CD Ballroom THURSDAY NOVEMBER 12

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 99-BG-229. On Application for Admission to the District of Columbia Bar

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKER S COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE ( January 27, 2000 Session)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

BEXAR COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY STRAW POLL ELECTION November 11, Dustin Ray Webb % Pavel Goberman % UV/OV 39 TOTAL:

Employment Discrimination Law Professor Nancy Modesitt Room 507 Administrative Assistant: Gloria Joy

IWFS Member Roster Jul 23, 2013 Americas / Lake Tahoe

Role of the Judge Standard III. Judge William Meyer (ret.) Senior Judicial Fellow National Drug Court Institute

Transcription:

Iowa Supreme Court Brent Appel Mark S. Cady Daryl L. Hecht 1. Knowledge and application of the law 4.35 4.48 4.32 2. Perception of factual issues 4.35 4.41 4.34 3. Attentiveness to arguments and testimony 4.37 4.48 4.38 4. Temperament and demeanor 4.36 4.49 4.48 5. Clarity and quality of written opinions 4.36 4.46 4.31 6. Promptness of rulings and decisions 4.14 4.33 4.15 7. Avoids undue personal observations or criticisms of litigants, judges and 4.46 4.50 4.52 lawyers from bench or in written 8. Decides cases on basis of applicable law and fact, not affected by outside 4.35 4.40 4.40 influence. 9. Is courteous and patient with litigants, lawyers and court 4.5 4.57 4.57 10. Treats people equally regardless of race, gender, age, national origin, religion, 4.53 4.55 4.54 sexual orientation, socio-economic Retention 93.8% 93.5% 92.2% Number of respondents 192 214 167

Iowa Court of Appeals Larry J. Eisenhauer Terry L. Huitink Rosemary Shaw Sackett 1. Knowledge and application of the law 4.37 4.25 3.68 2. Perception of factual issues 4.38 4.22 3.66 3. Attentiveness to arguments and testimony 4.42 4.31 3.83 4. Temperament and demeanor 4.51 4.37 3.80 5. Clarity and quality of written opinions 4.39 4.25 3.66 6. Promptness of rulings and decisions 4.40 4.32 3.92 7. Avoids undue personal observations or criticisms of litigants, judges and 4.60 4.45 4.07 lawyers from bench or in written 8. Decides cases on basis of applicable law and fact, not affected by outside 4.51 4.32 3.85 influence. 9. Is courteous and patient with litigants, lawyers and court 4.61 4.45 4.07 10. Treats people equally regardless of race, gender, age, national origin, religion, 4.60 4.46 4.12 sexual orientation, socio-economic Retention 94% 91.7% 77.6% Number of respondents 183 157 192

1A 1B 2A 2B 3A Thomas J. Straka Thomas N. Bower Bradley J. Harris Christopher C. Foy Colleen D. Weiland Timothy J. Finn Gary L. McMinimee Michael J. Moon William C. Ostlund William J. Pattinson James B. Malloy John Stoebe Patrick M. Carr Don E. Courtney John P. Duffy 1. Knowledge and application of the law 3.78 4.17 4.32 3.85 3.74 4.30 4.14 4.12 3.90 4.39 4.09 4.16 4.54 3.81 4.30 2. Perception of factual issues 3.85 4.24 4.33 4.02 3.88 4.28 3.97 4.12 3.94 4.28 4.20 4.12 4.46 3.91 4.30 3. Punctuality for court proceedings 4.08 4.37 4.59 4.19 4.29 4.44 4.22 4.37 4.14 4.40 4.27 4.28 4.48 4.28 4.31 4. Attentiveness to arguments and testimony 4.04 4.27 4.53 4.36 4.27 4.33 4.09 4.23 4.09 4.38 4.26 4.22 4.28 4.25 4.29 5. Management and control of the courtroom 4.08 4.50 4.47 3.88 4.14 4.36 4.03 4.35 4.15 4.42 4.26 4.24 4.45 4.11 4.39 6. Temperament and demeanor 4.26 4.55 4.47 4.45 4.39 4.10 3.68 3.99 4.16 4.17 4.29 4.21 4.07 4.58 4.17 7. Clarity and quality of written opinions 3.81 4.10 4.19 3.95 3.83 4.25 4.05 4.12 3.87 4.36 4.25 4.12 4.34 4.05 4.25 8. Promptness of rulings and decisions 4.08 4.17 4.35 3.85 4.00 4.23 3.92 4.31 3.98 3.68 4.33 4.24 3.85 3.25 3.65 9. Avoids undue personal observations or criticisms of 4.16 4.50 4.50 4.43 4.48 4.13 4.19 3.84 4.15 4.27 4.47 4.17 4.16 4.47 4.27 10. Decides cases on basis of applicable law and fact, not 4.13 4.32 4.44 4.37 4.38 4.25 4.21 4.02 4.10 4.36 4.30 4.09 4.27 4.32 4.31 11. Is courteous and patient with litigants, lawyers and court 4.38 4.58 4.58 4.60 4.55 4.20 3.87 4.06 4.29 4.31 4.50 4.44 4.00 4.56 4.31 12. Treats people equally regardless of race, gender, age, 4.38 4.58 4.59 4.64 4.61 4.37 4.20 4.10 4.33 4.47 4.57 4.40 4.40 4.56 4.29 Retention 96.2% 92.2% 96.7% 91.3% 93.5% 87.8% 90.4% 85.3% 88.1% 94.2% 94% 89.8% 91% 91.4% 88% Number of respondents 57 82 76 76 76 115 105 109 101 104 50 49 67 58 67

3B 4 5A 5B 5C Duane E. Hoffmeyer Edward A. Jacobson James D. Scott Mary Jane Sokolovske Gary E. Wenell John C. Nelson James S. Heckerman Timothy O Grady Susan Kay Christensen Dale B. Hagen William H. Joy David L. Christensen Monty W. Franklin Richard G. Blane II Robert J. Blink Arthur E. Gamble 1. Knowledge and application of the law 4.38 3.67 4.51 4.10 4.22 4.08 3.79 4.13 4.06 3.93 4.07 4.28 3.83 4.39 4.42 4.40 2. Perception of factual issues 4.36 3.74 4.43 4.19 4.16 4.13 4.04 4.15 4.06 3.95 4.13 4.30 3.70 4.28 4.34 4.41 3. Punctuality for court proceedings 4.71 3.64 4.68 4.20 4.16 4.46 4.18 4.36 4.14 4.40 4.36 4.57 4.09 4.49 4.49 4.49 4. Attentiveness to arguments and testimony 4.51 3.80 4.55 4.35 4.08 4.31 4.04 4.36 4.14 4.25 4.28 4.39 3.88 4.48 4.38 4.40 5. Management and control of the courtroom 4.58 4.08 4.57 4.06 4.29 4.34 4.26 4.39 4.12 4.30 4.28 4.51 4.04 4.34 4.38 4.48 6. Temperament and demeanor 4.13 3.80 4.45 4.44 3.67 4.08 4.11 4.20 3.97 4.24 4.04 4.31 3.93 3.69 3.78 4.07 7. Clarity and quality of written opinions 4.31 3.63 4.42 4.01 3.96 4.08 3.74 4.16 3.94 4.01 4.13 4.34 3.83 4.40 4.35 4.35 8. Promptness of rulings and decisions 4.42 3.43 4.54 3.65 3.92 4.28 4.00 4.31 4.19 4.30 3.93 4.51 3.90 4.02 4.32 4.30 9. Avoids undue personal observations or criticisms of 4.34 3.91 4.46 4.56 3.56 4.28 4.25 4.28 4.00 4.37 4.24 4.48 3.87 4.09 3.90 4.27 10. Decides cases on basis of applicable law and fact, not 4.31 3.86 4.44 4.39 3.94 4.28 4.05 4.17 3.94 4.18 4.16 4.43 3.91 4.43 4.25 4.33 11. Is courteous and patient with litigants, lawyers and court 4.27 3.88 4.44 4.66 3.66 4.15 4.22 4.26 4.05 4.36 4.22 4.36 3.96 3.81 3.80 4.15 12. Treats people equally regardless of race, gender, age, 4.52 4.11 4.63 4.62 4.26 4.40 4.38 4.43 4.11 4.56 4.42 4.61 4.08 4.40 4.42 4.47 Retention 96% 82.6% 97.6% 90.3% 85% 88.6% 84.5% 91.2% 86.5% 95.7% 87.8% 92.4 88.2% 89.8% 89.3% 91.7% Number of respondents 75 69 85 72 80 44 71 80 37 93 98 79 34 225 225 241

5C 6 7 Michael D. Huppert Douglas F. Staskal Dennis J. Stovall Colin J. Witt Nancy A. Baumgartner Marsha A. Bergan Patrick R. Grady Fae Hoover-Grinde Thomas Koehler Casey D. Jones Russell Glen Keast Barbara H. Liesveld Angeline M. Wilson J. Hobart Darbyshire Marlita A. Greve Mary E. Howes 1. Knowledge and application of the law 4.43 4.34 3.74 4.53 4.13 4.24 4.41 4.15 4.06 4.47 4.24 3.82 4.29 4.03 4.33 3.80 2. Perception of factual issues 4.44 4.32 3.81 4.58 4.20 4.27 4.43 4.28 4.09 4.52 4.32 3.83 4.26 4.02 4.38 4.06 3. Punctuality for court proceedings 4.55 4.47 4.05 4.61 4.35 4.58 4.45 4.45 4.44 4.62 4.39 4.05 4.44 4.22 4.52 4.23 4. Attentiveness to arguments and testimony 4.53 4.47 4.04 4.66 4.32 4.53 4.42 4.53 4.00 4.63 4.37 4.01 4.36 4.09 4.52 4.07 5. Management and control of the courtroom 4.46 4.42 4.03 4.56 4.34 4.38 4.49 4.41 4.30 4.55 4.42 4.07 4.35 4.11 4.41 4.09 6. Temperament and demeanor 4.52 4.50 3.89 4.70 4.03 4.55 4.13 4.67 3.77 4.71 4.33 3.95 4.43 3.74 4.61 4.08 7. Clarity and quality of written opinions 4.39 4.30 3.79 4.55 4.08 4.31 4.32 4.23 3.99 4.42 4.27 3.83 4.22 4.01 4.39 3.89 8. Promptness of rulings and decisions 4.48 4.41 3.92 4.59 4.28 4.15 4.29 4.24 4.34 4.63 4.30 3.92 4.37 4.12 4.58 3.97 9. Avoids undue personal observations or criticisms of 4.58 4.53 4.14 4.70 4.08 4.59 4.35 4.62 3.66 4.62 4.38 4.17 4.49 3.82 4.59 4.13 10. Decides cases on basis of applicable law and fact, not 4.49 4.43 4.09 4.68 4.21 4.48 4.40 4.53 3.80 4.65 4.31 4.04 4.40 4.03 4.55 4.11 11. Is courteous and patient with litigants, lawyers and court 4.56 4.55 4.09 4.75 4.18 4.68 4.25 4.69 3.82 4.69 4.41 4.15 4.60 3.75 4.69 4.24 12. Treats people equally regardless of race, gender, age, 4.60 4.58 4.35 4.76 4.53 4.72 4.53 4.70 4.12 4.71 4.46 4.26 4.55 4.20 4.67 4.35 Retention 96.9% 93.7% 86.9% 97.4% 96.3% 95.5% 94.9% 97.8% 84.1% 97% 96% 90% 96.4 85.7% 94.2% 86.8% Number of respondents 194 191 191 114 163 135 175 135 177 68 75 80 55 112 86 91

7 8A 8B Gary D. McKenrick Christine Dalton Ploof Daniel P. Wilson Mary Ann Brown John G. Linn Michael J. Schilling Emily S. Dean 13. Knowledge and application of the law 4.33 3.49 3.94 4.13 3.78 4.50 3.73 14. Perception of factual issues 4.30 3.50 3.87 4.09 3.80 4.50 3.94 15. Punctuality for court proceedings 4.42 3.93 4.42 4.50 4.11 4.62 4.15 16. Attentiveness to arguments and testimony 4.35 3.66 4.24 4.31 3.87 4.64 4.10 17. Management and control of the courtroom 4.44 3.67 4.19 4.31 4.09 4.34 4.00 18. Temperament and demeanor 4.29 3.42 4.28 4.02 3.83 4.67 4.29 19. Clarity and quality of written opinions 4.38 3.46 3.92 4.04 3.70 4.52 3.90 20. Promptness of rulings and decisions 4.34 3.84 4.15 3.94 3.83 4.08 4.20 21. Avoids undue personal observations or criticisms of 4.26 3.44 4.37 3.78 4.26 4.65 4.27 22. Decides cases on basis of applicable law and fact, not 4.26 3.43 3.99 3.98 4.00 4.61 3.97 23. Is courteous and patient with litigants, lawyers and court 4.33 3.61 4.45 4.11 4.00 4.67 4.29 24. Treats people equally regardless of race, gender, age, 4.46 3.91 4.45 4.24 4.17 4.68 4.21 Retention 92.3% 66% 91.5% 83.3% 84.6% 98% 86.5% Number of respondents 104 50 82 54 52 52 37