Innovations in Obesity: A Policy Perspective

Similar documents
Nutrition and Health Foundation Seminar

Why the Increase In Obesity

Statement of Objectives:

Randy Wexler, MD, MPH Associate Professor and Clinical Vice Chair Department of Family Medicine The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Obesity. Picture on. This is the era of the expanding waistline.

PINELLAS HIGHLIGHTS DIET & EXERCISE

Healthy Weight: Healthy Wales. Youth and community version

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

Executive Summary: Toi Te Ora s Childhood Obesity Prevention Strategy ( )

14. HEALTHY EATING INTRODUCTION

NATIONAL NUTRITION WEEK 2012: A Food Guide to Healthy Eating

NACPH ( National Association for Consumer Protection in Hungary) response to the European Commission s Green Paper on

Media centre Obesity and overweight

On-the-go nutrition snacking for the children s market The changing role of snacking

Meánscoil na mbráithre Críostaí, Cill Chainnigh

Workplace Nutrition and Public Health Context. Jade Clark, RD BDA Work Ready Accredited Dietitian

session Introduction to Eat Well & Keep Moving

Unit code: K/601/1782 QCF level: 5 Credit value: 15

FRUIT AND VEGETABLES CONSUMPTION AND PREVENTION OF CHRONIC DIET-RELATED NON- COMMUNICABLE DISEASES. Mike Rayner Chair EHN Expert Group on Nutrition

The sugar reduction environment. Professor Julian G. Mercer Rowett Institute

Public Health Association of Australia: Policy-at-a-glance Prevention and Management of Overweight and Obesity in Australia Policy

RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION ON GREEN PAPER ON HEALTHY EATING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

Table Classification of body mass index (BMI) and risk of comorbidities in adults (WHO, 1998; WHO Expert Consultation,

VIDEO WORKSHEET. Review: # Name: Hour: After viewing each segment, answer the following questions. Making Family Meals Happen

Choose Health! STRATEGIES TO CREATE A MODEL MENU FOR HEALTH

5. HEALTHY LIFESTYLES

Looking Toward State Health Assessment.

Country Report: Sweden General Conclusions Basic Facts Health and Nutrition Health Related Initiatives Climate Change

Childhood obesity. Chandralall Sookram Medical Officer WHO/AFRO Brazzaville Congo

(*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14%

An update on HM Government new example menus for early years settings in England

2018 Global Nutrition

IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF. Competitive School Food and Beverage Act. Be it enacted by the People of the State of, represented in the General

Module Let s Eat Well & Keep Moving: An Introduction to the Program

National Multi-sectoral Action Plan for Prevention & Control of NCDs in India

Session 21: Heart Health

Health and Wellness. ENRIQUE A. TAYAG, MD, PHSAE, FPSMID, CESO III Assistant Secretary of Health Support to Service Delivery Technical Cluster II

Medicaid Report: New Hampshire and Vermont. Preventative Care and Obesity

CZECH REPUBLIC. School food policy (mandatory) Year of publication 2005, 2008

NATIONAL COST OF OBESITY SEMINAR. Dr. Bill Releford, D.P.M. Founder, Black Barbershop Health Outreach Program

BNF LOOKS AT THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE WORLD CANCER RESEARCH FUND 2018 THIRD EXPERT REPORT* AND HOW IT COMPARES TO UK GUIDELINES

What is the status of child obesity worldwide and in the South East Asia Region?

The National perspective Public Health England s vision, mission and priorities

Nutrition and Physical Activity Situational Analysis

#IGObesity16. Richard Sangster Team Leader Obesity Policy Department of Health

Assessment Schedule 2011 Home Economics: Examine New Zealand food choices and eating patterns (90246)

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

Draft of the Rome Declaration on Nutrition

overweight you are part of it!... Healthier, fitter, safer... Seafarers Health Information Programme ICSW S.H.I.P.

Appendix G. U.S. Nutrition Recommendations and Guidelines. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Balancing Calories to Manage Weight

KEY INDICATORS OF NUTRITION RISK

Assessing food environments to monitor policy implementation. Boyd Swinburn Professor of Population Nutrition & Global Health University of Auckland

Consumer Sovereignty and Healthy Eating: Dilemmas for Research and Policy. W Bruce Traill The University of Reading

Development of a Regional Framework of Action in obesity Prevention in the Eastern Mediterranean Region

THE CONSUMER COMES FIRST MYTH OR REALITY?

FORESIGHT Tackling Obesities: Future Choices Project Report Government Office for Science

Children, Adolescents and Teen Athlete

Overweight and Obesity Factors Contributing to Obesity

Program Focus Team Action Plan:

Health Promoting Practices - Patient follow up survey (Dental)

KING JAMES I ACADEMY. Packed Lunch Policy

ASIA-PACIFIC HEART HEALTH CHARTER

Following Dietary Guidelines

THE FAMILIES AND FOOD SURVEY Food Marketing and Communication Summary Report

YMCA Canberra Healthy Food and Drink Policy

Classes of Nutrients A Diet

Sund skolemad med smag smil og samvaer

UIC Obesity Research Roundtable

Swiss Food Panel. -A longitudinal study about eating behaviour in Switzerland- ENGLISH. Short versions of selected publications. Zuerich,

HELPING CHILDREN ACHIEVE ENERGY BALANCE

OUR LADY QUEEN OF PEACE R.C. PRIMARY SCHOOL

The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report is based on a rigorous, evidence-based evaluation of the best available science.

BOOST. Water Does Wonders! CHOOSE TO. Early Exposure and Role Modeling VEGGIES & FRUIT

Burden Of Obesity and Physical Inactivity A Report on Obesity and Related Morbidity and Mortality and Physical Inactivity in La Crosse County

Childhood Obesity on the Rise

SMART SNACKS IN SCHOOL. USDA s All Foods Sold in School Nutrition Standards New for Snacks and Beverages

Joint response to UK consultation on front of pack nutrition labelling

BNF looks at years 7 and 8 of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) Rolling Programme (2014/ /2016)

RICHMOND PARK SCHOOL LIFESTYLE SCREENING REPORT Carmarthenshire County Council

CHOOSE HEALTH: FOOD, FUN, AND FITNESS. Read the Label!

Tim Lobstein Director of Policy and Programmes

HE 250 PERSONAL HEALTH. Fitness

Overweight. You are part of it! Healthier, fitter, safer.

Federation of St Godric s and St Mary s RCVA Primary Schools. Packed Lunch Policy

Guideline scope Smoking cessation interventions and services

A public health perspective on the importance of good nutrition within and beyond school. Linda de Caestecker Director of Public Health

EU food policy: public health beyond the internal market

Taking Nudge Digital Food Choice at Work. Dr Fiona Geaney

IFST Lecture 2012 Prof. Colin Dennis CBE President, IFST

St Bede s RCVA Primary Packed Lunch Policy

Packed Lunch Policy. School Food Policy for Packed Lunches (brought in from home)

INTEGRATED HEALTH PROMOTION STRATEGIC PLAN

Child obesity a national plan for action

Case Study #4: Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease

Karin LundKaarin Lund Kansas State University. Kaarin Lund

Together we succeed. Packed Lunch Policy. NAME OF SCHOOL: Hutton Henry C E Primary. School Food Policy for Packed Lunches (brought in from home)

LIVE HEALTHY. Disclosure. Learning Objectives. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas. Pediatrics Grand Rounds 28 June 2013

POLICY: JHK (458) Approved: September 25, 2006 Revised: February 24, 2015 SCHOOL WELLNESS

Prevent and/or reduce overweight and obesity through improved eating and physical activity.

Transcription:

Innovations in Obesity: A Policy Perspective Nutrition & Health Foundation October 2011 Dr Tony Holohan, Chief Medical Officer

Overview Where we are now - health status and the reform programme Priorities Policy response public health and obesity Next steps

Where are we now Health service reform programme HSE, HIQA, DoHC Contractual frameworks Patient safety and quality Clinical leadership and governance Roles of other agencies/regulators Re-organisation of delivery of care Primary care, mental health etc. Re-organisation of hospitals Patient safety a key driver Emergence of standards Older people, symptomatic breast, mental health Service user involvement Service planning, performance monitoring, reporting in public

What are we getting? Life expectancy Mortality Disease specific Infant and maternal Morbidity Health care associated infections Pandemic, vaccinations etc.

The case for change Disease burden Demography, epidemiology Global trends shaping health and illness Practice changes teamworking, specialisation etc. Policy developments - patient safety Public perception Technology - medical and ICT Cost Third era of health care

Programme for Government Special delivery unit Universal health insurance Care/cure split Hospital trusts Patient Safety Authority Emphasis on prevention e.g. obesity

Age Population Pyramid for Ireland 2001 14 85+ 30 22 80-85 36 Male 000s Female 000s 37 75-79 52 51 63 75 93 114 122 129 134 138 160 169 167 148 135 140 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 60 66 75 91 112 121 132 138 137 157 166 159 141 127 131

Age Population Pyramid for Ireland 2031 27 85+ 60 Male 000s Female 000s 46 80-85 73 74 101 122 139 164 176 162 140 130 140 152 158 166 157 146 143 75-79 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 98 119 135 143 164 177 162 139 128 137 146 151 157 148 138 134

Life Expectancy 2006/2007 Data, CSO 2010

Profile of Adult Risk Factors in Ireland (SLÁN 2007)

Preventability 60% disease burden due to tobacco, alcohol, cholesterol, high blood pressure, diet, overweight & physical inactivity 80% chronic disease (cardiac, stroke, diabetes) avoidable Unacceptable levels chronic disease over next decades

Barton & Grant 2005

Conditions for Health Income Housing Transport Education Environment Food Alcohol Justice Social Support Leisure Culture

% of 9 Year Olds Chronic illness & mother s education 10 9 8 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 5 4 3 2 1 0 Lowest Income Group 2nd 3rd 4th Highest Income Group

Food

We shape our environments thereafter they shape us.

How chronic disease is managed Rule of halves Few patients adequately identified Few receive proper care in the appropriate setting Insufficient attention to prevention Poor self-management support Discontinuity between primary care and hospital Evidence-based guidelines not followed Poor compliance High readmission rates to hospital Diagnostic registries incomplete

Conclusions Need to promote positive health and well-being We have the knowledge to prevent more effectively The case for change is clear Third era of health care brings a renewed focus on health as distinct from health services Chronic disease a major challenge Public health system has become weakened Morale Systems People The ideas and ideals are not wrong! The methods need to be examined

OBESITY

Obesity health risks Coronary heart disease Type 2 diabetes Cancers (endometrial, breast, and colon) Hypertension (high blood pressure) Dyslipidemia (for example, high total cholesterol or high levels of triglycerides) Stroke. Liver and Gallbladder disease Sleep apnea and respiratory problems Osteoarthritis (a degeneration of cartilage and its underlying bone within a joint) Gynecological problems (abnormal menses, infertility) Overweight is defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 25 or higher Obesity is defined as a BMI of 30 or higher.

Obesity Trends for Adults 61% of Irish adults ( 18-64 years ) are overweight or obese 70% men and 52% women Levels of overweight and obesity have increased 1990 to 2011 Overall 51% to 61% Men 59% to 70% Women 41% to 52%.

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1985 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1986 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1987 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1988 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1989 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1990 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1991 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1992 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1993 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1994 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1995 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1996 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1997 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1998 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 1999 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 2000 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 2001 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20% 24% 25%

Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 2002 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20% 24% 25%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 2003 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20% 24% 25%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 2004 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20% 24% 25%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 2005 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20% 24% 25% 29% 30%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 2006 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20% 24% 25% 29% 30%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 2007 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20% 24% 25% 29% 30%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 2008 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20% 24% 25% 29% 30%

OBESITY TRENDS* AMONG U.S. ADULTS BRFSS, 2009 (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs. overweight for 5 4 person) No Data <10% 10% 14% 15% 19% 20% 24% 25% 29% 30%

Obesity- a complex picture Genes Diet Physical Activity Maternal diet Diet in first 1,000 days of life Parental influence/role model Individual v Environment

Irish diet High in fat High in saturates High in salt High in sugar Low in omega 3 fats Low in iron, calcium, folate and vitamin D

% of 9-year-olds Child s weight and BMI 90 80 70 78 73 67 60 50 40 30 20 10 18 20 22 4 8 11 0 Non Overweight Overweight Obese Professional/Managerial Semi-skilled/Unskilled Manual Other Non-Manual/Skilled Manual

Nutrition & Physical Activity 60% of adults eat more fat than recommended (50% of teenagers exceed recommendations) Average adult intake from Top Shelf of Food Pyramid is 7.3 servings daily, more than double recommended level Children s calorie intake mainly derived from bread, biscuits, soft drinks, milk/dairy, potatoes Salt current adult consumption levels 8.9g/day Physical Activity in 1997-9 adults were physically active for 8 hours per week. In 2001, the level is 5.9 hours per week.

Factors promoting weight gain (WHO) High intake energy dense foods Sugar-sweetened drinks Large portion sizes Food prepared outside the home Sedentary lifestyles Social disadvantage Food marketing

Bagel 20 Years Ago Today Cheeseburger 20 Years Ago Today 140 calories 350 calories 333 calories 590 calories Chips 20 Years Ago Today 210 calories 610 calories

Prevention strategies Increase physical activity Increase the consumption of fruits and vegetables Decrease the consumption of sugar sweetened beverages Increase breastfeeding initiation, duration and exclusivity Reduce the consumption of high energy dense foods Decrease television viewing Informed by better information and evidence

Individual v environmental Individual and parental responsibility Environmental support making the healthy food choice the easy choice (food reformulation - lower fat) Rapidly rising obesity rates in children factors outside immediate, conscious discretion (passive over-consumption increasing portion size) Population approach to control what and how much children eat Requires engagement and behaviour change by parents, children, those in the food chain, government

Supportive environments Home environment strong influence on children s habits Parental obesity strong potential predictor of child and later obesity. Access to healthy foods at home fruit & veg Parental responsibility for home food and school lunches Control snacking and intake of convenience foods Regular, family meals eaten sitting down together at a table without TV School environment- Food and Nutrition guidelines Healthy eating policies Improved nutrition knowledge through SPHE

Special Action Group on Obesity Established by Minister Reilly in June 2011 Priority issues Calorie Posting on Fast Food Outlet Menus Nutrition Labelling Restrictions on Food Marketing to Children Sugar Tax Vending Machines in Post-Primary Schools Physical Activity Plan Treatment Algorithm for Overweight and Obesity Opportunistic Monitoring/Surveillance of Children Treatment Centres Multimedia Campaign Revised Food Pyramid/Healthy Eating Guidelines

Calorie posting Over the last decade - steady increase in proportion of food eaten/prepared outside the home Evidence from US shows that people who tend to eat outside the home are heavier than those who eat at home Food eaten/prepared outside the home means no control over portion size, added fat, sugar or other ingredients

Sugar tax High intake of sugar-sweetened drinks Satiety levels different after eating solid and liquid foods Possibly reduce gastric distension and speed up transit times Energy in fluids not well detected by brain Leads to reduced appetite control Subsequent food intake is poorly adjusted

Marketing of foods and drinks to children Most food marketed to children is unhealthy Little marketing of healthy foods Major advertising spend is on TV Schools are a growing market Internet is a growing market BAI consultation

Adverse socio-economic conditions Socio-economic status is a key health determinant Lower income less money to spend on food This group spend a higher percentage of their total income on food Lack of skills influences food and cooking patterns More susceptible to obesogenic environment cheap low cost, high energy foods

The recommended diet vs the advertised diet

Public health framework

Policy response To develop a public health policy Your Health is Your Wealth: A Policy Framework for a Healthier Ireland: 2012-2020 Tied into WHO Health 2020 To bring to reality the provisions in the Programme for Government with regard to the health and wellbeing of the whole population A healthier population Protected from public health threats Living in a healthier and more sustainable environment Increased social and economic productivity Greater social inclusion

Terms of reference (1) To develop a policy framework for public health which addresses wider determinants of health and health inequalities chronic disease and lifestyle inter-sectoral and cross-sectoral approaches at policy and practice level protection from and responses to public health threats.

Terms of reference (2) And which will encompass ethical, legal, organisational and professional practice issues for public health having regard to: the Programme for Government current resource constraints prevailing economic circumstances the views of stakeholders as identified through consultation the strength and weaknesses of the current system the policy framework for Health 2020 as set out by the WHO Euro region policies, practices, structures and other developments in other countries the evidence base for public health policy and practice.

Consultation - Five Strands Strand 1 National consultation day - 13 th June, RCPI WEBLINK from RCPI website Strand 2 Regional meetings to mirror national constulation day local HSE Local Authorities, schools and sporting organisations- June 2011 Strand 3 General consultation (august/september) invited organisations, as well as the general public, to respond to specific questions on public health priorities Strand 4 Targeted consultation for Health Sector engagement - HSE and funded agencies Strand 5 Bi-lateral meetings with relevant Government Departments, agencies and community/voluntary organisations

Three Strands Health protection Emergency planning and preparedness Communicable disease control Environmental health Food and water safety Health promotion Health inequalities Health improvement Lifestyle related risks Health service delivery Population planned services deliver to individuals A public health approach to service planning, delivery and evaluation

Final product Presented in three sections Analysis Plan Implementation Governance for health and well-being National and local Public health function To be completed by end year and launched by Minsiter for Health

Key messages First ever policy on public health in its widest sense Once in a generation opportunity Timing is good Refocusing of health system Tie into WHO Health 2020 We need you to become involved

Thanks for your attention