. θωρακικούάλγουςστα εξωτερικά ιατρεία

Similar documents
Current and Future Imaging Trends in Risk Stratification for CAD

Optimal testing for coronary artery disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

Pearls & Pitfalls in nuclear cardiology

Hit the road Jack! W. FRANK PEACOCK, MD, FACEP, FACC

Which Test When? Avoid the Stress of Stress Testing. Marc Newell, MD, FACC, FSCCT Minneapolis Heart Institute

2/20/2013. Why use imaging in CV prevention? Update on coronary CTA in 2013 Coronary CTA for 1 0 prevention: pros and cons Are we there yet?

High Value Evaluation of Chest Pain. Zoom Tips

Risk Stratification for CAD for the Primary Care Provider

I have no financial disclosures

Imaging ischemic heart disease: role of SPECT and PET. Focus on Patients with Known CAD

My Patient Needs a Stress Test

The Value of Stress MRI in Evaluation of Myocardial Ischemia

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE Centre for Clinical Practice

Troponin = 35. Objectives. Low Risk Chest Pain. Does this patient have ACS? Does this patient have ACS? Objectives

Chest Pain Wave I. Making Dollars and Sense Out of Stress Testing

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Ca Score

Stress Testing:Which Study is Indicated for My Patient?

Calcium scoring Clinical and prognostic value

CHRONIC CAD DIAGNOSIS

Atypical pain and normal exercise test

21st Annual Contemporary Therapeutic Issues in Cardiovascular Disease

Simon A. Mahler MD, MS, FACEP Associate Professor Department of Emergency Medicine Wake Forest School of Medicine

The use of Cardiac CT and MRI in Clinical Practice

The Role of Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Atherosclerosis

DIFFERENTIATING THE PATIENT WITH UNDIFFERENTIATED CHEST PAIN

ROMICAT II - Rule Out Myocardial

Εξελίξεις και νέες προοπτικές στην καρδιαγγειακή απεικόνιση CT. Σταμάτης Κυρζόπουλος Ωνάσειο Καρδιοχειρουργικό Κέντρο

1. LV function and remodeling. 2. Contribution of myocardial ischemia due to CAD, and

STRESSED ABOUT STRESS TESTS

ESC CONGRESS 2010 Stockholm, august 28 september 1, 2010

Welcome! To submit questions during the presentation: or Text:

Technical Meeting on: Current Role of Nuclear Cardiology in the Management of Cardiac Diseases Vienna, May 2008 Vienna International Centre

Unnecessary hospitalisation and investigation of low risk patients presenting to hospital with chest pain

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Efficiency

2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY

SPECT CT Current Status and Future Direction Nuclear Cardiology

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Use of Nuclear Cardiology in Myocardial Viability Assessment and Introduction to PET and PET/CT for Advanced Users

Topic. Updates on Definition of Myocardial Infarction

7. Echocardiography Appropriate Use Criteria (by Indication)

9/2/2016 CARDIOLOGY TESTING WHAT TO ORDER WHEN REFERENCE OBJECTIVES

Chest Pain in Women ;What is Your Diagnostic Plan? No Need for Noninvasive Test

Screening for Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease: When, How, and Why?

Guideline Number: NIA_CG_024 Last Review Date: January 2011 Responsible Department: Last Revised Date: May 2, 2011 Clinical Operations

Stress only Perfusion Imaging

SPECT-CT: Τι πρέπει να γνωρίζει ο Καρδιολόγος

CASE from South Korea

The Emerging Role of Cardiac CT in Cardiovascular Imaging. Anthony Gemignani, MD Vermont Cardiac Network April 28, 2016

Evidence for Everyone: Expanding the Reach of Health Technology Assessment 2016 CADTH Symposium, April 10-12, Shaw Centre, Ottawa

Congreso Nacional del Laboratorio Clínico 2016

The 2016 NASCI Keynote: Trends in Utilization of Cardiac Imaging: The Coronary CTA Conundrum. David C. Levin, M.D.

Non Invasive Diagnostic Modalities for Coronary Artery Disease. Dr. Amitesh Aggarwal

MD F A F C A C MAS A N S C

Diabetes and Occult Coronary Artery Disease

Choosing the Appropriate Stress Test: Brett C. Stoll, MD, FACC February 24, 2018

UPDATE ON THE MANAGEMENTACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. DR JULES KABAHIZI, Psc (Rwa) Lt Col CHIEF CONSULTANT RMH/KFH 28 JUNE18

Medical Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: The roles of a noncardiologist. Norbert Lingling D. Uy, MD Professor of Medicine UERMMMCI

Essam Mahfouz, MD. Professor of Cardiology, Mansoura University

FFR-CT Not Ready for Primetime

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Efficiency

Testing the Asymptomatic CAD Patient: When and Why?

Is computed tomography angiography really useful in. of coronary artery disease?

A Light in the Dark: Cardiac MRI and Risk Mitigation. J. Ronald Mikolich MD Professor of Internal Medicine Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED)

P F = R. Disorder of the Breast. Approach to the Patient with Chest Pain. Typical Characteristics of Angina Pectoris. Myocardial Ischemia

Chest Pain. Dr Robert Huggett Consultant Cardiologist

Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS)

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Emergency Department Updated Jan. 2017

Non ST Elevation-ACS. Michael W. Cammarata, MD

Indications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014

Cardiovascular nuclear imaging employs non-invasive techniques to assess alterations in coronary artery flow, and ventricular function.

PET myocard perfusion & viability Riemer Slart

Case Question. Evaluation of Chest pain in the Office and Cardiac Stress Testing

FFR Incorporating & Expanding it s use in Clinical Practice

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

Imaging of the Heart Todd Tessendorf MD FACC

M/39 CC D. => peak CKMB (12 hr later) ng/ml T.chol/TG/HDL/LDL 180/150/48/102 mg/dl #

Evaluating Clinical Risk and Guiding management with SPECT Imaging

When Should I Order a Stress Test or an Echocardiogram

HEART AND SOUL STUDY OUTCOME EVENT - MORBIDITY REVIEW FORM

Σεμινάριο Ομάδων Εργασίας Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Σε ποιούς ασθενείς; ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΑΥΖΩΤΗΣ Επιστ. υπεύθυνος Αιμοδυναμικού Τμήματος, Βιοκλινική

Evidence-Based Management of CAD: Last Decade Trials and Updated Guidelines

Appropriateness of Stress Echocardiography and Nuclear Stress Thallium/Sesta Mibi Testing Methods

FFR in Multivessel Disease

Richard Grocott Mason

MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient F. Mut, J. Vitola

Cardiovascular nuclear imaging employs non-invasive techniques to assess alterations in coronary artery flow, and ventricular function.

Disclosure Information

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Test in Subjects with Suspected CAD Anatomic Study is Better

CT FFR: Are you ready to totally change the way you diagnose Coronary Artery Disease?

Patient referral for elective coronary angiography: challenging the current strategy

The Final 10-Year Follow-up Results from the Bari Randomized Trial J Am Coll Cardiol (2007) 49;1600-6

CLINICIAN INTERVIEW RECOGNIZING ACS AND STRATIFYING RISK IN PRIMARY CARE. An interview with A. Michael Lincoff, MD, and Eric R. Bates, MD, FACC, FAHA

Stress ECG is still Viable in Suleiman M Kharabsheh, MD, FACC Consultant Invasive Cardiologist KFHI KFSHRC-Riyadh

2010 ACLS Guidelines. Primary goals of therapy for patients

Cardiology for the Practitioner Advanced Cardiac Imaging: Worth the pretty pictures?

Cardiac evaluation for the noncardiac. Nathaen Weitzel MD University of Colorado Denver Dept of Anesthesiology

Multimodality Cardiac Imaging: Its Use in the Era of Value-based Reimbursement

CHEST PAIN CDU INCLUSION CRITERIA

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin in Suspected ACS

Transcription:

. θωρακικούάλγουςστα εξωτερικά ιατρεία Ε.Γ. ΑΛΑΜΑΓΚΑ ΚΑΡ ΙΟΛΟΓΟΣ ιδάκτωρ Ιατρικής Σχολής ΑΠΘ ΓΕΝΙΚΗ ΚΛΙΝΙΚΗ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΟΣ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΑΤΗΣ Α ΚΑΡ ΙΟΛΟΓΙΚΗΣ ΚΛΙΝΙΚΗΣ ΝΟΣΟΚΟΜΕΙΟ ΑΧΕΠΑ

Panic attack Myocardial pain Herpes zoster Subdiaphragmatic abscess Breast cancer Lung cancer Amniotic fluid embolus Thoracic spine disease Sickle cell anemia pneumonia Mallory-Weiss Aortic dissection Tietze s disease Musculosceletal pain Breast abscess pneumothorax Blunt chest trauma 3rd Qtr 4th empyema Qtr Pulmonary embolus asthma Breast implant

ER visits United States 100.000.000 annually 3.000.000 Non cardiac 40.000 AMIs 8.000.000 with chest pain (8%) 5.000.000 Suspected or Actually cardiac 2.500.000 Non- cardiac (50%) 1.000.000 AMI (20%) 1.200.000 UA (24%) 300.000 Sudden death (6%)

What about chest pain in AMI? In a study of 434.877 patients with confirmed MI from 1674 US hospitals - More than one third of all patients present without chest pain - Of these 63,7% were UA/NSTEMI patients - Certain MI patients such as women, elderly and patients with prior heart failure are more likely to present without chest pain. Canto GJ et al.jama 2000;283:3223-3229

If symptoms don t work, how about the ECG? The ECG isn t that sensitive The standard 12-lead ECG has only 50-60% sensitivity at diagnosing AMI as - the commonest mode of presentation of AMI is NSTEMI i.e. ST-depression, T-inversion, LBBB, LVH or normal ECG - absence of leads facing the posterior, high right anterior, lateral wall of the left ventricle and the anterior portion of the right ventricle.

Is the ECG it specific? 1335 suspected STEMI Receiving emergency coronary angiography 187 (14%) no culprit coronary artery 127 (9,5%) no significant CAD 150 (11,2%) negative cardiac biomarkers 123 (9,2%) no culprit artery and negative markers Larson DM, JAMA 2007;(23):2754-2760

Acute cardiac ischemia in the ED 10.869 patients 17% total ACS 2,8% mistakenly discharged 83% some other diagnosis (55% non cardiac)

Cardiac biomarkers

Accurate Risk stratification Identification by exclusion of ACS and other serious conditions

Risk stratification Identification of Low Clinical Risk No history of CAD probability of MI<6% Normal or near normal ECG Negative initial cardiac injury markers

Identification by exclusion of ACS Low risk is not no risk! Chest Pain Units Accelerated Diagnostic Protocols

TIMI risk score. patients with the lowest risk as defined by a TIMI score of zero had a 1.7% incidence of adverse events. Therefore, the TIMI risk score should not be used in isolation to determine disposition of ED chest pain patients. [Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:252-259.] GRACE risk score reported to accurately predict risk in an undifferentiated chest pain population.

Possible ACS

Tc - 99m - labeled agents: trapped in the myocardium and do not redistribute. Tracer injection at rest in the ED Patients may be transferred to the nuclear cardiology laboratory later (late images reflect MBF at the time of injection)

Diagnostic accuracy of sestamibi SPECT vs cardiac troponin I (ctni) Among 620 pts studied 9% had AMI and 13% had a final diagnosis if significant coronary disease. - Sensitivity for detecting MI was similar between SPECT imaging (92%) and ctni (90%). - The initial ctni value, however, had only a sensitivity of 39% and serial determinations were necessary to achieve a high sensitivity. Kontos MC et al, Circulation 1999;99:2073-2078

ERASE a randomized control study

Women

Diabetic patients (high risk group for CAD) 341 diabetic pts Improved triage in symptomatic ED pts with diabetes

Diagnostic accuracy of Rest MPI in pts with acute chest pain and nonischemic ECG

Ischemic memory imaging Limitation of rest MPI: the ability to detect ischemia in the patient who is symptom free at, or shortly after, ED arrival. In the setting of acute ischemia, high energy adenosine triphosphate production shifts from fatty acid metabolism to glucose utilization. Thus suppression of fatty acid metabolism may persist long after the resolution of the perfusion abnormality and ischemia, a phenomenon that is has been reffered to as ischemic memory. Clinical studies have demonstrated persistend reductions in BMIPP uptake long after resolution of ischemic symptoms. Fujibajashi Y et al, J Nucl Med 1990;31:1818-22 Hosokawa R et a,l J Nucl Med 1997;38:1857-63 Dilsizian V, et al. Circulation 2005;112:2169-74

50 centers, 448 pts

Attenuation correction!!!! Possible ACS

Confirmatory Test Selection Exercise Treadmill Testing Myocardial Imaging Myocardial perfusion imaging Echocardiography ± stress (pharmacological or exercise) Coronary Artery Imaging Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography

Exercise Treadmill Testing ETT without imaging should be performed as the initial test in low- to intermediate- risk patients who present with ischemic symptoms and can exercise, do not have significant baseline ECG changes and are not taking digoxin.

Exercise Treadmill Testing

Echocardiography Rest Echocardiography a normal ECHO like a normal ECG is an indicator of low clinical risk, it may be insufficiently sensitive for detection of RWMAs Stress Echocardiography excellent negative predictive value

Computed Coronary Artery Imaging Cardiac CT 2009 Rule out coronary artery stenosis Clinically most reasonable in low-likelihood situations Stable atypical chest pain Unclear ischemia test results Low risk emergency room Prior to non-coronary surgery Selected patients after revascularization (stent, CABG) Anomalies Prior to interventions Prior to EP interventions

Large single center study JACC 2009 368pts, 53±12 years, 61% men low to intermediate likelihood of ACS -50% no CAD -31% non obstructive CAD -19% obstructive CAD

Diagnostic accuracy of Coronary CTA for the Detection of Acute coronary Syndrome and Myocardial Infarction during Index Hospitalization among pts with acute chest pain based on the presence of any coronary plaque or the presence of coronary artery stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing) Coronary CTA finding sensitivity specificity PPV(95%CI) NPV(95%CI) Acute coronary syndrome Any plaque 89%-100% 49%-60% 12%-23% 98%-100% Coronary stenosis Myocardial infarction 59%-90% 83%-90% 24%-48% 95%-99% Any plaque 63%-100% 46%-56% 2%-8% 98%-100% Coronary stenosis 24%-91% 78%-86% 2%-16% 97%-100%

AUCs for the detection of acute coronary syndromes during index hospitalization JACC 2009 Areas under the receiver-operating curves (AUCs) were higher for both plaque and stenosis as compared to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score.

Coronary Artery Imaging

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography CTCA has the potential for major clinical utility in the triage of selected low-risk patients presenting to the ED with chest pain because of its very high negative predictive value. The positive predictive value of the method is more limited than the negative predictive value, which can lead to unnecessary invasive angiography in a significant number of patients..romicat II trial

Prognostic Value of CT Angiography for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Acute Chest Pain From the Emergency Department 2-Year Outcomes of the ROMICAT Trial Christopher L. Schlett, MD*, Dahlia Banerji, MD*, Emily Siegel, BA*, Fabian Bamberg, MD, MPH, Sam J. Lehman, MBBS*, Maros Ferencik, MD, PhD*,, Thomas J. Brady, MD*, John T. Nagurney, MD, MPH, Udo Hoffmann, MD, MPH*, Quynh A. Truong, MD, MPH*,,* Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2011; 4:481-491 CT coronary and functional features predict MACE and have incremental prognostic value beyond clinical risk score in ED patients with acute chest pain. The absence of CAD on CT provides a 2-year MACE-free warranty period, whereas coronary stenosis with RWMA is associated with the highest risk of MACE.

59 pts Similar diagnostic yield (?) Did not reduce.the length of stay..rate of subsequent testing..costs

A number of imaging modalities (myocardial perfusion scanning, CCTA, and echocardiography) may be utilized in evaluating stable patients with chest pain suggestive of ACS who are not selected for urgent cardiac catheterization. Diagnostic accuracy Prognostic importance compare different imaging modalities compare different diagnostic strategies.improve confidence regarding the safety of discharge from the emergency department.

Influence of medications (b blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers)..the rate of nondiagnostic ETT was twice that in the group not taking them (61%) had a diagnostic ETT.adequate functional capacity 5 METS with no exercise induced abn consistent with low clinical risk.vasodilator stress MPI