Almond Harvest 2017, Stevinson Home Ranch 7 Area Test of PNTI Products. D. Amoroso, J. Shumard, R. Sigler, R. Shumard, J. Booth, L.

Similar documents
3.0 Supplying Nutrients to Crops

Supplying Nutrients to Crops

Roses with Vitazyme application

Apples and Pears. Above 2.7. Above 2.4

Enclosed are the tissue analysis results for the samples from the greens at Golf Club.

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

29278 US Highway 119 N Belfry, KY USA

Managing Micronutrients with Soil (Plant) Testing and Fertilizer

Mineral Nutrition of Fruit & Nut Trees. Fruit & Nut Tree Nutrition 3/1/2013. Johnson - Nutrition 1

RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO FERTILIZERS

Nut Crop Nutrition Understanding the Principles to Optimize the Practices.

REMEMBER as we go through this exercise: Science is the art of making simple things complicated!

Understanding a Soil Report

2009 Elba Muck Soil Nutrient Survey Results Summary, Part III: Calcium, Magnesium and Micronutrients

TOTAL SULPHUR CONTENT AND ITS EFFECT ON AVOCADO LEAVES

Understanding Your Soil Report. Michael Cook 2018

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

Nutrient Management in Subtropical Tree Crops. The avocado model

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

Micronutrient Deficiencies in Blueberries and Their Correction

Soil Nutrients and Fertilizers. Essential Standard Explain the role of nutrients and fertilizers.

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs

12. ZINC - The Major Minor

Tim Mundorf Fall 2016

Effects of Harvest Date and Late-Summer Fertilization Rate on Stockpiled Bermudagrass Forage Mineral Concentrations

IRON CHLOROSIS IN AVOCADOS

Patented ECO-FERTILIZER. Soil AMENDMENT. Nitrogen REPLACEMENT

Unit B: Seed Germination, Growth, and Development. Lesson 4: Determining Nutrient Functions and Utilization

Grinder-Pedersen L, Rasmussen SE, Bugel S, Jorgensen LV, Dragsted LO, Gundersen V, Sandstrom B.

Determination of available nutrients in soil using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES

Trends in Turf Nutrition: Balancing Environmental Protection and Turf Performance

SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN LEAF MINERAL CONTENT

Reading and Analyzing your Fertilizer Bag. Dr. Cari Peters Vice President

Analyte Proficiency From All Labs # Analytes: 26 Sample # Statistical Summary # Labs Reporting: 82 Urea Issue Date : 06/30/2016

Minerals, Trace Elements and Enzymes. Dan Kittredge

PURE BRAZIL BRAND PRODUCTS

AgriCal by. Healthier Soils Stronger Plants Higher Yields

Avocado Fertilization'

STANDARD METHODS FOR CHEMICAL ELEMENTS IN FOOD OF ANIMAL ORIGIN

Using Tissue and Soil Tests Together Helps Make Better Decisions. John Lee Soil Scientist AGVISE Northwood, ND

FERTILIZING. Correct time is during October and November. Sample young, fully developed, hardened off leaves.

NUTRITION KNOW-HOW P.O. BOX 897 // WILLMAR, MN (800) // WCDST.COM

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DIVISION OF MARKETING CHAPTER COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this lesson:

TNPSC Chemistry Study Material Fertilizers

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

Nutrients. Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen 1/18/2012. Soils, Nutrients and Fertilizers Part I I. 17 elements essential for plant growth

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

Developing your Fertilizer Management Program. Outline. 2/6/2018. Other factors Species Correct site Weather Weed control. Soil physical properties

By Andrew & Erin Oxford, Bethel

Keywords: hydroponic, media, soilless culture, zeolite

Quick Tips for Nutrient Management in Washington Berry Crops. Lisa Wasko DeVetter Assistant Professor, Small Fruit Horticulture March 16, 2016

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATION JIM FASCHING Technical Field Representative

Research Update. In hydroponic production, the fertilizer solution must provide all plant essential

Soybean Soil Fertility

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DIVISION OF MARKETING CHAPTER COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER TABLE OF CONTENTS

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

Soil Composition. Air

We are committed to becoming a watershed to Agriculture and restoring it to its rightful place in the economy. This is substantiated through our

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

A & L GREAT LAKES LABORATORIES, INC.

Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management. Hailin Zhang. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Specialists In Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition and Irrigation Water Quality Management.

The role of water in the maintenance of life

1) Yellow Corn in 2014 Compared to 2013 and ) Time of Day Plant Tissue Project

In mid-october, all plots were again soil sampled to determine residual nutrients.

MEASURE AND MANAGE. Soiless Mixes, Testing and Nutrition Guidelines

Overview. Managing Soil Fertility in Organic Systems. Fertilizer Analyses? Fertilizer Analyses? What Soil Amendments Can Be Used?

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. Inspection and Consumer Services Division. Fertilizers and Soil Conditioners 8 CCR

Potash Phosphate Nitrogen

1101 S Winchester Blvd., Ste. G 173 San Jose, CA (408) (408) fax Page 1 of 2

Effect of Increasing Levels of Monensin in an Energy Supplement for Cattle Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture

Soil Prescription - Sample 1

FERTILIZER EFFECTS UPON MICRONUTRIENT NUTRITION OF THE AVOCADO

AGVISE Laboratories Established 1976

Stoller s Options and Timings for Increasing Tuber Numbers in Potatoes

Controlled Release Fertilizer Evaluations 1998

Micro Site Enhanced Technology. How it Works

Importance of Water Quality: ph, buffering, and effects on nutrient availability

How to Select the Right Fertilizer for Hydroponics

Multi-K. Potassium Nitrate Products For Healthy Crops

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

EC Fertilizer Know How

Plants Essential Elements. Macro and Micronutrients

Pomegranate Irrigation and Nutrient Management

RELATION OF APPLIED NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM TO YIELD, QUALITY AND LFAF CG1POSITI~ OF THE GREENHOUSE TCMATO

Seasonal Trends in Nutrient Composition of Hass Avocado Leaves 1

INTERPRETING SOIL & LEAF ANALYSIS

Mark Petersen & Jen Muscha. Livestock & Range Research Laboratory

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

Essential Elements. Original research don by Julius von Sachs 1860 using hydroponics

GREEN 3 Date Date Sample Sample B067921C Received: 15/08/2013 Reported: 20/08/2013 Reference: Green 3 Number: SBA1674 CROP: Cool Season

Product Name : Fish s Amino Nutrients

Project: TopCal for sodium management during leaching at Mission Viejo Country Club

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

There are six general classes of nutrients needed in the horse s diet: water carbohydrates fats protein minerals vitamins.

OFFICIAL METHODS FOR CHEMICAL ELEMENTS IN FOOD OF ANIMAL ORIGIN

FERTILIZATION. Roland D. Meyer, Daniel B. Marcum, and Steve B. Orloff ESSENTIAL PLANT NUTRIENTS

Transcription:

Almond Harvest 2017, Stevinson Home Ranch 7 Area Test of PNTI Products D. Amoroso, J. Shumard, R. Sigler, R. Shumard, J. Booth, L. Nanis 01Dec2017 SUMMARY, SECTION!: The 2017 total almond harvest (combined 05Sep Non-Pareil and 23Oct Monterey) from Stevinson HR7 trees treated with PNTI fertilizers yielded an average of 2107 lbs meats per acre, a 75% improvement over the total HR7 yield of 1202 lbs meats per acre for year 2016. SUMMARY, SECTION 2: Tree leaf and meats nutrient levels and average almond weight in PNTI-treated color-coded HR7 areas closely match those from a conventionally fertilized Stevinson HR6 area. 1.0 INTRODUCTION: A seven acre area of Stevinson Ranch almond trees was dedicated to testing PNTI fertilizer products. Identified as Home Ranch 7 (HR7), the area was first fertilized in October 2016 with a mixture of PNTI products PoweRoc, BioRoc and RocTea. For a second fertilization, in February 2017, the area was divided into five equal-size 1.4 acre regions, each receiving a different combination of PNTI products. Color-tagged trees identified the type of treatment applied in each of the five regions. During the PNTI fertilizer test period, no other type of fertilizer was added to the five test regions. PNTI test regions received only water on the same watering schedule as the main Stevinson almond orchard. Non-Pareil variety (NP) almonds growing in the test regions were harvested on 05Sep2017. Monterey variety almonds were harvested on 23Oct2017. Field weights were determined from net cart weights of harvested almonds. Total field weight for each color-coded area (shown in Table 1.1) is the combination of weights from the 05Sep Non-Pareil and 23Oct Monterey harvests. Samples were also obtained from each region for laboratory measurement of weights of husk, shell and meats in order to estimate the crack-out (percentage of meats weight yielded from field weight). 1.1 METHOD AND RESULTS: Field weight data are summarized in Table 1.1 together with the calculated Meats,lbs/acre for each color region, determined from application of the also listed laboratorymeasured crack-out percentages to field weight data. In Table 1.1, Color identifies regions of the second fertilization (Feb 2017); Field Weight is total measured weight minus empty cart weight in pound units as measured with a calibrated set of Intercomp Corp. Model PT300 portable electronic scales ; Area is 1.4 acres for each HR7 color region; Crack Out, Meats Weight per Field Weight, is estimated from laboratory measurements of field samples taken from each color region at Non-Pareil and Monterey harvests. Weights of husks, shells and meats were measured for each sample to yield a Crack Out percentage and thus estimate Meats weight from actual field weights. Table 1.1 also shows an estimate of Meats, lbs/acre. More detail is given below in Section 1.2 titled sample weigh procedure. Table 1.2 describes the treatment given to each color-coded area in HR7 during the second fertilization (Feb 2017). (page1/6)

Table 1.1 indicates a year 2017 total HR7 harvest average yield of 2107 Meats, lbs/acre, a 75 % improvement over the 1202 lbs/acre obtained for the year 2016. It is noted that the year 2017 average yield of 2107 is quite close to the Meats values for the previous years 2013 and 2014. Table 1.1 HR7-PNTI 2017 Almond Harvests,Non-Pareil (NP) and Monterey (M) Field Weight, lbs and Meats, lbs per acre Crack Out Color Harvest Field weight Wt. Meats/Field Wt. Meats MEATS/ACRE Variety lbs percent lbs lbs/acre RED NP 9930 23.0 2284 M 4260 27.6 1176 TOTAL 14,190 3460 2471 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GREEN NP 8190 20.2 1654 M 4060 27.4 1112 TOTAL 12,250 2766 1976 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BLUE NP 6360 24.2 1539 M 6650 28.3 1882 TOTAL 13,010 3421 2443 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PURPLE NP 4050 18.0 729 M 3340 29.3 979 TOTAL 7,390 1708 1220 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YELLOW NP 4490 21.9 983 M 8890 27.1 2409 TOTAL 13,380 3392 2423 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HR7 AVERAGE MEATS, LBS/ACRE 2107 (page2/6)

Table 1.2 Color-coded Area Fertilization Treatments, HR7, Feb2017 COLOR RED YELLOW TREATMENT First fertilization (Oct 2016) only; no second fertilization First fertilization only plus disk and harrow row vegetation; no second fertilization GREEN Added two (2) tons per acre of PNTI Almond Blend (PoweRoc/BioRoc ) mixture plus disk and harrow row vegetation. BLUE Disk and harrow row vegetation; applied 75 gallons RocTea PURPLE Disk and harrow row vegetation; applied two(2) tons per acre Almond Blend plus 75 gallons RocTea 1.2 SAMPLE WEIGH PROCEDURE In order to correlate field weight with meats per acre, an estimate of crack-out percentage was obtained experimentally by weighing meats taken from small field samples, randomly selected from the harvests in each HR7 color-coded test region and also from a reference sample from HR6 trees growing near the HR7 acres. Each small field sample weighed from 450 to 600 grams and contained mostly shells in husks plus some empty husks and some meats in shell. Stones and twigs were picked out before weighing. Meats were manually de-husked, de-shelled, counted and weighed on a laboratory scale accurate to ± 0. 05 gram. Empty husks and empty shells were collected and weighed together with Meats for a double check of total sample field weight. The ratio of Meats weight to field weight is listed in Table 1.1 as a percentage and was used in Table 1.1 to estimate crack-out weight of Meats (in units of pounds per acre) obtainable from actual harvest field weight (pounds). All shells and meats from the small test samples taken from Non-Pareil and Monterey harvests were examined for defects. Any obviously defective meats and shells were rejected from the count. Defects included meats with frass trails, withered meats and from shells with worm holes. Double meats in one shell were included in the count as one meat. In general, defects amounted to about 5 percent or less of the total meats examined. As an example, the NP small sample from the GREEN area was de-husked and de-shelled with a yield of 111 good meats and 6 rejects including one with a frass trail. The total weight of good meats was 116.5 gram so that the average weight of a good meat was (116.5)/(111) = 1.05 gram per almond. Total weight of empty husks plus empty shells plus meats was 577.2 gram so that the crack-out percentage of Meats is estimated as 20.2 % of field weight. The crack-out percentage determined in a similar manner for the GREEN Monterey small sample was 27.4 %. As shown in Table 1.1, individual percentages were applied in calculating yield from field weight for each color test area for NP and Monterey harvests. The overall average value is 24.7 %. (page3/6)

2.0 ADDITIONAL RELATED MEASUREMENTS (page 4/6) In addition to crack out measurements described in Section 1, separate metrics also obtained for the HR7- PNTI test regions show a close match between nutrient levels in meats and tree leaves for the PNTI fertilization treatment regions as compared with conventionally fertilized Stevinson Ranch orchards. The metrics are (Section 2.1) assay of nutrient chemistry in samples from the NP harvest; (Section 2.2) assay of tree leaf nitrogen and other nutrient levels in the test regions. (Section 2.3) A third metric is the average weight of almonds in each test region for both NP and Monterey harvests; data obtained in Section 1.1 weight measurements. The almond nutrient assay and tree leaf assay were determined at accredited independent laboratories. A brief account of the measurement methods and results follows. 2.1 NUTRIENT LEVELS, MEATS Nutrient levels in HR7 PNTI-treated Non-Pareil meats match nutrient levels in conventionally fertilized Stevinson HR6 orchard almonds. To compare nutrient levels, meats from two HR7 and one HR6 NP harvest field samples were finely divided by grinding and then dissolved in acid for element analysis by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) at Soil Control Laboratories, Watsonville CA. Table 2.1 shows nutrient element concentrations in NP meats from the PNTI fertilized RED and PURPLE HR7 zones and in NP meats from the conventionally fertilized WHITE HR6 zone. For comparison, Table 2.1 also includes nutrient levels for natural almonds listed in USDA publication SR25 Nutrient Data Base No. 12061. All concentrations are in units of parts per million (ppm). Table 2.1 Non-Pareil Meats Nutrient Element Concentrations, ppm Element RED,HR7 PURPLE,HR7 WHITE,HR6 USDA SR25 Calcium 2400 2600 3600 2640 Iron 67 69 69 37 Magnesium 3000 3100 3100 2600 Phosphorous 5234 5239 5676 4840 Potassium 7600 7300 7800 7050 Sodium - - - 10 Zinc 32 34 28 31 Copper 18 15 14 10 Manganese 24 24 24 22 As shown in Table 2.1, nutrient concentrations in PNTI-treated RED and PURPLE HR7 area Non-Pareil meats agree well (except for Calcium) with nutrient levels in the WHITE HR6 area which received conventional

fertilization. In general, nutrient levels in the PNTI-treated HR7 areas match USDA SR25 levels and are at measurably greater levels for Iron, Magnesium and Phosphorous. 2.2 NUTRIENT LEVELS, LEAVES A check of crop quality before harvest time is customarily provided by analysis of leaf nutrient chemistry. Leaf nutrient data shown in Table 2.2 are extracted from Report 43995 for HR7 trees and Report 43996 for HR6 trees. HR6 data was chosen for comparison since the HR6 area received conventional watering and fertilization and is adjacent to HR7 area treated only with PNTI fertilizers and water. Both reports are dated 17July 2017 and were provided to Stevinson Ranch by Stanislaus Farm Supply, Modesto, CA (analyses determined by A&L Western Laboratories). The normal range is included in Table 2.2 for comparison with HR7 and HR6 leaf nutrient levels. Table 2.2 LEAF NUTRIENTS (17July2017), percent ELEMENT NORMAL RANGE HR7 HR6 Nitrogen 2.2--2.5 2.22 2.73 Sulfur 0.1 0.4 0.17 0.18 Phosphorus 0.11--0.3 0.15 0.17 Potassium 1.4--2.5 1.5 1.94 Magnesium 0.25--1.0 0.67 0.53 Calcium 2.0--2.4 3.11 1.85 Sodium 0.01--0.09 0.04 0.02 As shown in Table 2.2, all leaf nutrients for HR7 trees are within the normal range except for above-normal Calcium at 3.11 % which is in contrast to below-normal HR6 Calcium at 1.85%. Leaf Nitrogen serves as an important indicator of tree health and is within normal range for HR7 although no nitrogen compounds were added to the HR7 color-coded test areas by any of the three PNTI fertilizer products PoweRoc, BioRoc or RocTea. Tree leaf nutrient assays reported on 15May2017 (HR7 Report 42059, HR6 Report 42058) were all within the normal range, similar to the 17July2017 levels listed in Table 2.2. HR7 Nitrogen in May was at 3.07 %, well within a 2.8 3.8 % normal range. As noted in Section 1 of this report, harvested meats were abundant in HR7 test areas with July leaf Nitrogen at 2.22 %. Recalling that no Nitrogen compounds are added to PNTI fertilizers, natural Nitrogen fixation aided by root region bacteria and PNTI Roc chemistry may play a role in maintaining HR7 at an adequate Nitrogen level. In conventionally fertilized HR6, above-normal Nitrogen in HR6 leaves ( at 3.81 % in May and 2.73 % in July ) may indicate excess dosage. (page 5/6)

2.3 AVERAGE ALMOND WEIGHT Average meat weight was determined from weight of shelled NP and Monterey meats for each color-coded HR7 area. WHITE meats from the adjacent HR6 area are included for reference. As mentioned in Section 1.1, shelled meats were counted and weighed. Meats counted for each color-coded area numbered between 100 and 150. Double meats were counted as a single meat; broken meats were matched and combined to be counted as a single meat. Based on multiple measurements of selected samples, each average weight can be considered to have an uncertainty of about ± 0.15 gram. In the weight data shown in Table 2.3, no significant difference can be discerned between the average almond meat weight for HR7 color-coded areas as compared with WHITE HR6 conventionally fertilized almonds. Likewise, weights are similar for all color-coded areas, for both NP and Monterey varieties. Table 2.3 AVERAGE ALMOND WEIGHT, grams HR7 AREA COLOR Non-Pareil Monterey RED 1.12 1.19 YELLOW 0.95 1.20 GREEN 1.05 1.04 BLUE 1.04 1.01 PURPLE 1.19 1.18 (HR6)WHITE 0.95 1.27 LN 01Dec2017 File: HR7PNTIAlmondHarvestREV5 (page 6/6)