Third International Scientific Symposium "Agrosym Jahorina 2012"

Similar documents
Variability of microelements and antioxidants in maize hybrids and their parental inbred lines

ZINC AS A PLANT NUTRITIONAL PROBLEM IN THE EASTERN CROATIA

COMPARISON OF IMPREGNATED DRY FERTILIZER WITH S AND ZN BLENDS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS

Effects of Harvest Date and Late-Summer Fertilization Rate on Stockpiled Bermudagrass Forage Mineral Concentrations

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

Research on trace minerals in the common bean

Foliar Micronutrients for Broad Acre Crops Higher yield and better quality Balanced trace element supply for healthy crops Insurance against

Variability in Tissue Testing What Does It Mean For Nutrient Recommendations?

COMPARISON THE EFFECTS OF SPRAYING DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF NANO ZINCOXIDE AND ZINC OXIDE ON, WHEAT

Roses with Vitazyme application

MICRO NUTRIENTS AND SECONDARY NUTRIENTS

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

Effect of ammonia gas and some micronutrients by different methods on yield characters and micronutrients contents maize plants (Zea mays).

Enclosed are the tissue analysis results for the samples from the greens at Golf Club.

Fertility management in soybean

Enhancing Forages with Nutrient Dense Sprays 2013 Trials

In mid-october, all plots were again soil sampled to determine residual nutrients.

Corn and soybean yield responses to micronutrients fertilization

VOL. 5, NO. 6, June 2015 ISSN ARPN Journal of Science and Technology All rights reserved.

Effects of Bicarbonate and High ph Conditions on Zinc and Other Nutrients Absorption in Rice

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Terry Richmond s Fertilizer Package mentioned in the panel discussion March 14, 2013.

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

USE OF OCEANGROWN PRODUCTS TO INCREASE CROP YIELD AND ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT CONTENT. Dave Franzen, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Managing Micronutrients with Soil (Plant) Testing and Fertilizer

The 1 th International and The 4 th National Congress on Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture April 2012 in Isfahan, Iran

Plant Food. Nitrogen (N)

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Tim Mundorf Fall 2016

Veterinary Information Sheet

Animal, Plant & Soil Science. D3-7 Characteristics and Sources of Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients

Micronutrient Management. Dorivar Ruiz Diaz Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management

Influence of High-P-Chelated Micronutrients on Nutrient Uptake of Chickpea Under Vertisols

1) Yellow Corn in 2014 Compared to 2013 and ) Time of Day Plant Tissue Project

Supplying Nutrients to Crops

Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

The Effect of Boron (B) Application on the Growth and Nutrient Contents of Maize in Zinc (Zn) Deficient Soil

Markus Braaten. Elston D. Solberg. Director of Agri-Knowledge Agri-Trend. US Director of Agri-Knowledge Agri-Trend USA

Effects of FGD-Gypsum, Used-Wallboard and Calcium Sulfate on Corn and Soybean Root Growth

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

The effect of potassium nitrate on the uptake and translocation of foliar-applied nutrients in plants

Different Fertilisers

Greenhouse Horticulture

Fetrilon Combi 1/ Fetrilon Combi 2/ Hortrilon

Response of Zinc Fertilization to Wheat on Yield, Quality, Nutrients Uptake and Soil Fertility Grown In a Zinc Deficient Soil Keram, Komal Singh

Ni and N sources (Urea and ammonium sulphate) affecting growth, yield and quality in maize plant (Zea mays)

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

Miletin d.o.o., Crepaja. Flora Bečej - MK Group, Bečej. Uljarice Bačka, Ruma. Blago 4 - Treatment of sugar beet

Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, I am delighted to have the privilege to speak to you today. I come from Canada, and over the past few

RELATIONS AMONG SIX MICRONUTRIENTS IN GRAIN DETERMINED IN A MAIZE POPULATION

Water-Soluble Fertilizer Fertigation and Foliar Application. The Authority in Potassium and Magnesium

FOLIAR FEEDING IMPACT ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF COMMON WHEAT

IONIC INTERACTIONS IN MAIZE GROWN UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITIONS

Materials and Methods Field layout and agronomy of the study, nutrient analyses, and statistical analysis is as described in Oyetunji et al.

Uptake of Cu, Zn, Fe and Mn by maize in the strip cropping system

Protein and Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer and Variation of Plant Tissue Analysis in Wheat

ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE OF DIFFERENT CHELATED ZINC SOURCES ON MICRO AND MACRO NUTRIENTS UPTAKE IN MOONG PLANT AND SEED (VIGNA RADIATA)

Scientific registration n o : 2303 Symposium : 25 Presentation : poster

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Table 1. Wheat grain nutrient concentrations (Norton, 2011) and critical nutrient concentrations (Reuter and Robinson, 1997)

EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF HUMIC ACID PRODUCTS IN TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT. K. Carey and E. Gunn

Research Update: Determining Soil Potassium Requirements of Sand Based Putting Greens

MARGAM SUNITHA, KANWAR L. SAHRAWAT, AND SUHAS P. WANI. Introduction

REMEMBER as we go through this exercise: Science is the art of making simple things complicated!

Keywords: hydroponic, media, soilless culture, zeolite

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR BANANA MUSA (AB GROUP) NJALIPOOVAN IN ONATTUKARA SOILS

IMPACT OF TRACE MINERAL VARIATION WITHIN FORAGES ON THE RATION FORMULATION PROCESS. J. R. Knapp Fox Hollow Consulting, LLC Columbus, Ohio INTRODUCTION

Bioscience Research Print ISSN: Online ISSN:

Impact of High Glucosinolate Mustard Biomass and Meal on Black Bean Yield

Rachel Madison 1 Lee McDowell George O Connor Nancy Wilkinson Paul Davis Adegbola Adesogan Tara Felix Megan Brennan

Essential Soil Nutrients for Plant Growth and Development

RESPONSE OF TOMATO AND CORN PLANTS TO INCREASING Cd LEVELS IN NUTRIENT CULTURE

TSADILAS Christos, SAMARAS Vasilios, SIMONIS Asterios, SETATOU Helen

FROM SOIL ELEMENTS TO FOOD NUTRIENTS: Joyce Kinabo Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Sokoine University, Tanzania

Nitrophoska. Cereals, fodder beet, horticulture, maize and vegetables. Precise nutrition for superior plant performance

Bioavailability of Cd to Food Crops in

MAGIC RECIPES? Strawberry Fertigation in the UK. John Atwood Senior Horticultural Consultant.

Impact of High Glucosinolate Mustard Soil Amendments on Black Bean Yield 2014

Effect of Phosphorous and Zinc Fertilisation on the Productivity of Transplanted Aromatic Rice

Mineral Nutrition of Fruit & Nut Trees. Fruit & Nut Tree Nutrition 3/1/2013. Johnson - Nutrition 1

The effect of nano-micronutrients seed priming on germinability of Kabuli chickpea

INTRODUCTION TO GCiC

Effect of N, Zn and Fe application on N, P, K content and total uptake in parmal rice (Oryza sativa L.)

E. Lyons, K. Jordan, and K. Carey. Department of Plant Agriculture and the Guelph Turfgrass Institute, University of Guelph, Ontario.

Determination of available nutrients in soil using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES

Nutrient Recommendations Agronomic Crops Last Updated 12/1/16. Grain Corn. Crop Highlights Target ph: 6.0

Micronutrients What should you be doing? Rob Norton Regional Director IPNI ANZ

Effects of Zn, Fe and Mn on soybean elements concentration

Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils

Nut Crop Nutrition Understanding the Principles to Optimize the Practices.

Water Soluble Fertilizer for Foliar Application

Multi-K. Potassium Nitrate Products For Healthy Crops

Unit C: Poultry Management. Lesson 1: Nutrients for Maintenance, Growth and Reproduction

Enhancing Forages with Nutrient Dense Sprays 2014 Trials

INFLUENCE OF DAIRY MANURE APPLICATIONS ON CORN NUTRIENT UPTAKE

PROTEIN AND MINERAL CONTENTS OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.) GENOTYPES GROWN IN CENTRAL ANATOLIAN REGION OF TURKEY

Soil Prescription - Sample 1

BOTANY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION. MACRONUTRIENTS Found in air and water carbon C oxygen hydrogen

Plants Essential Elements. Macro and Micronutrients

By Andrew & Erin Oxford, Bethel

Transcription:

10.7251/AGSY1203092R UDK 633.15-152.6 MICROELEMENTS CONCENTRATIONS IN MAIZE INBRED LINES GROWN ON ACID SOIL Mirta RASTIJA 1*, Vlado KOVACEVIC 1, Domagoj SIMIC 2, Tomislav BRKANIC 1 1 University of J. J. Strossmayer in Osijek, Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek, Osijek, Croatia 2 Agricultural Institute Osijek, Osijek, Croatia (Corresponding author: mrastija@pfos.hr) Abstract Maize genotypes show great variability in nutrients content, depending on growing conditions. The objective of present study was to determine effects of genotype and environment on grain yield and Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu concentrations in leaf and grain of maize inbred lines grown on acid soil. Five inbred lines were grown in a field trial during 2003 and 2004 in the east Croatia on the very acid soil with ph (KCl) 3.9. Growing season of 2003 was very dry and warm, while in 2004 above average rainfall was recorded. Highly significant effect of genotype and year was observed for the grain yield. Average yield across the years was 3.08 t ha -1, and it was significantly lower in 2003, due to severe drought. Higher influence of genotype was found for microelements in leaf, while for microelements concentrations in grain effect of year was also significant. Average microelements concentrations (in mg kg -1 ) were 143 Fe, 185 Mn, 47.7 Zn and 15.0 Cu for the leaf, and 30.7 Fe, 5.4 Mn, 24.5 Zn and 7.02 Cu for the grain. Key words: maize inbred lines, microelements, acid soil, leaf, grain Introduction Adequate microelements concentrations in agricultural plants, grain or seed, is very important for both, crops productivity and nutritive value of agricultural products. Maize genotypes show great variability in nutrients content, depending on environmental and growing conditions. Nutrients availability is associated with soil ph. The most microelements essential for plants are more available in acid soils, but this could lead to some other nutrient imbalances in plants. Important role of genotype on nutritional status of maize genotypes grown on acid soil has been reported (Kovacevic et al., 1997; Kovacevic et al., 2004; Antunović et al. 2003, Rastija et al., 2010). Heckman et al. (2003) reported that nutrient concentration in the same maize hybrid can vary considerably depending on the environment and microelements in grain shows much higher variability than macroelements. The microelements content in grain is a complex trait affected by a number of factors, including genotype, soil properties, environmental conditions and nutrient interactions (House, 1999). Significant genetic variation in grain mineral concentration has been reported among maize inbred lines in Croatia (Brkić et al., 2003; Brkić et al., 2004; Šimić et al., 2004). The objective of present study was to determine effects of genotype and environment on grain yield and Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu concentrations in leaf and grain of maize inbred lines grown on acid soil. Materials and methods Five genetically divergent maize inbred lines, parental components of hybrids, were grown at the location in the east Croatia during 2003 and 2004. The lines Os 84-44 (L1), Os 438-95 (L2) and Os 30-8 (L3) which are used as female parents of hybrids belong to BSSS 92

pool, while Os 1-44 (L4) and Os 6-2 (L5), used as male parents, are of Lancaster origin. The field trial was conducted on a very acid distric luvisol with very low phosphorus and low potassium, but high manganese and iron availability, whilst zinc and copper were in a moderate range (Table 1). Table 1 Soil chemical properties Year Organic ph mg(100 g) matter -1 mg kg -1 H 2 O KCl % P 2 O 5 K 2 O Fe Mn Zn Cu 2003 5.23 3.87 1.55 7.50 18.46 40.12 65.72 1.60 2.30 2004 4.83 3.90 2.00 9.57 17.85 98.70 56.81 2.51 3.69 The trial was set up in a randomized complete block design in three replications. The size of experimental plot was 8.4 m 2 in two rows. Usual crop management practice for maize growing was used. Maize was sown and harvested in the optimal agrotechnical terms. Soil samples for chemical analysis were taken before each harvest. Soil ph was determined according to ISO (1994), organic matter by sulfocromic oxidation (ISO, 1998), plant available phosphorus and potassium by ammonium-lactate extraction (Egner et al., 1960), and concentrations of microelements (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) by absorption technique after extraction with EDTA. The samples of ear-leaves were taken at the siliking stage. Grain samples were made of the five randomly picked ears per plot. The concentrations of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in leaf and grain were measured by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) technique after microwave digestion with HNO 3 +H 2 O 2. The obtained data were statistically analysed using ANOVA firstly separately for each year. Afterwards, combined analysis of variance was performed, considering genotype (inbred line) and year as main factors. mm 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 2003 2004 Average 30 yrs o C 25 20 15 10 5 0 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 2003 2004 Average 30 yrs Figure 1. Monthly amount of rainfall (mm) and average air temperatures ( C) for maize growing season 2003 and 2004 and 30-year mean values for field trial location Weather conditions during maize growing season considerably differed in two experimental years (Picture 1). The 2003 was exceptionally dry and warm and total rainfall in the growing period achieved only 50% of the long term mean value. The main feature of 2004 was rainy April and July, but generally it was more favourable year for maize growing. Results and discussion The analysis of variance showed very significant (P 0.01) effect of genotype (inbred line) on all traits, except for grain Fe concentration (P 0.05). The effect of year was also statistically proven for grain yield, concentration of Zn in leaf as well as for concentrations of all microelements in the grain. On the other hand, interaction line x year was no significant in most cases, except for Fe, Zn and Cu concentrations in grain. Table 2. Grain yields (t ha -1 ) of inbred lines over the years and significance levels for line (L) and year (Y) effects with LSD at the 0.05 probability level 93

Inbred line (L) Year (Y) 2003 2004 Mean (L) L1 2.93 4.79 3.86 a # L2 2.39 3.68 3.03 b L3 2.65 5.06 3.86 a L4 2.02 3.05 2.54 b L5 1.81 2.49 2.15 b Mean (Y) 2.36 b 3.81 a 3.08 F-test ** ** ** LSD 0.05 (L) 0.48 1.25 0.66 LSD 0.05 (Y) 0.42 # Mean values followed by the same letter within each column are not significantly different at P 0.05 ** - significant at P 0.01 level The grain yield averaged over years was 3.08 t ha -1 and great differences among years were found (Table 2). Much lower yield in 2003 is a consequence of severe drought and high air temperatures during maize growing season. It is well known that inbred lines are more susceptible to stress and that lower maize grain yield is in connection with dry and hot summer (Kovačević et al., 2009). Expectedly, female parental lines achieved higher yield. The lowest yield in the both years had L5, which is used as a male component and characteristic of high yield is not primarily important. Table 3. Concentrations of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu (mg kg -1 ) in leaf and grain of five maize inbred lines averaged over two years and significance levels with LSD at the 0.05 probability level Leaf (mg kg -1 ) Grain (mg kg -1 ) Inbred line Fe Mn Zn Cu Fe Mn Zn Cu L1 143 b # 157 c 46.2 b 16.7 b 29.5 a 5.36 b 22.2 c 10.7 a L2 138 b 161 c 46.0 b 13.9 c 33.8 a 4.22 c 25.1 b 7.12 b L3 123 b 122 c 41.5 b 9.2 d 23.8 b 5.10 b 21.6 c 3.70 c L4 131 b 269 a 65.2 a 16.4 bc 32.1 a 5.45 b 25.0 b 7.36 b L5 180 a 218 b 39.4 b 20.0 a 34.4 a 6.86 a 28.7 a 6.25 b Mean 143 185 47.7 15.2 30.7 5.40 24.5 7.02 F-test ** ** ** ** * ** ** ** LSD 0.05 22 47 7.57 2.67 6.3 0.77 2.76 2.03 # Mean values followed by the same letter within each column are not significantly different at P 0.05 *,** - significant at P 0.05 and P 0.01 level Regarding microelements concentrations in ear-leaf, great variability among inbred lines was found, but even greater for concentrations in grain (Table 3). The highest Fe and Cu concentration in leaf had L5, while the highest values for Zn and Mn in leaf was observed for the L4. Generally, in the both years quite high Mn leaf status was determined, what is a consequence of low ph and high Mn availability in soil (Table 1). According to Godo and Reisenauer (1980) manganese content in the leaves abruptly increases when soil ph drops below 5.5. Mengel and Kirkby (2001) reported that the value of 200 mg Mn kg -1 may reduce dry matter yield, while values of 35 to 100 mg Mn kg -1 in maize ear leaves consider as optimal (Bergmann, 1992). The both male parental lines had leaf Mn above 200 mg kg -1. However, although two years differed regarding growing conditions, year effect wasn t significant for microelements in leaves, except for the Zn. In the more favourable 2004 growing season, higher Zn concentration was found (Table 4) and it was in the optimal range. The greatest variability among lines was determined for the Cu concentration, as it was in the wide range from 9.2 to 20.0 mg kg -1. 94

Table 4. Mean values for concentrations of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in leaf and grain of five maize inbred lines across the years and significance levels with LSD at the 0.05 probability level Leaf (mg kg -1 ) Grain (mg kg -1 ) Year Fe Mn Zn Cu Fe Mn Zn Cu 2003 146 194 44,0 b # 15,2 37,2 a 5,80 a 25,5 a 10,3 a 2004 140 176 51,3 a 15,2 24,2 b 5,00 b 23,6 b 3,7 b Mean 143 185 47,7 15,2 30,7 5,40 24,5 7,0 F-test ns ns ** ns ** ** * ** LSD 0.05 4,79 3,4 0,49 1,74 1,29 # Mean values followed by the same letter within each column are not significantly different at p<0.05 *,** - significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level respectively, ns - not significant Unlike the leaves concentrations, growing year considerable affected micronutrient grain status, especially copper, whose concentrations was almost three times higher in the first year (Table 4). Overall, higher values for all tested microelements was recorded in 2003, what can be attributed to concentration effect i.e. reverse dilution effect due to lower grain yield and lower carbohydrates accumulation in dry growing season. Microelements concentrations in grain are often in the negative correlation with grain yield (Bänziger and Long, 2000) and depend on the content in a vegetative tissue and on the efficiency of translocation, both of which may be under genetic control (Bouis et al., 1999). Inbred lines were clearly differentiated by concentrations of micronutrients in the grain. The highest grain Mn and Zn content again were determined in L5, male component of hybrid. Brkić et al. (2003) also found the highest Zn concentration in grain of genotypes that included this line as a parent, indicated importance of inheritance for grain nutrient contents. Commonly, maize grain contains small amount of manganese and the average value of 5.40 mg Mn kg -1 is in the normal range, although quite high concentration in leaves were observed. On the contrary, between Zn concentration in leaf and grain is much smaller difference than in Mn (Table 3), due to more efficient translocation of Zn into the grain (Pearson and Rengel, 1994). Unlike other microelements, whose concentration in the grain was highest in L5, the highest Cu value in the grain was determined in L1, female parent, suggesting the specificity of this genotype for Cu accumulation. Conclusion The study showed that the both, year and genotype significantly affected maize grain yield and grain Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu concentrations, while on leaf microelements concentration higher influence had genotype. In hot and dry growing season the microelements grain content was higher due to lower yield. Considerable variability for micronutrient status in leaf and grain of maize inbred lines was determined, although only five genotypes were included. It seems that independently on higher Mn availability in acid soil and its greater accumulation in leaf, Mn content in the grain remains relatively low. Generally, male inbred lines had higher microelements concentrations in leaf and grain. However, the highest Cu concentration in grain had one female parental line, suggesting on some genetic specificity for higher Cu accumulation. References Antunović, M., Kovačević, V., Rastija, M., Zdunić, Z. (2003.). Influences of soil and genotypes on micronutrient status in maize plants. Poljoprivreda/Agriculture, 9(1), 9-14. 95

Banziger, M., Long, J. (2000). The potential for increasing the iron and zinc density of maize through plant breeding, Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 21(4), The United Nations University Press, 397-400. Bergmann, W. (1992). Nutritional Disorders of Plants - Development, Visual and Analytical Diagnosis. Jena; Stuttgart; New York. G. Fischer. Bouis, H., Graham, R. D. Welch, R. M. (1999). The CGIAR Micronutrients Project. Justification, History, Objectives, and Summary of Findings. IFPRI Conference Improving Human Nutrition Through Agriculture. The Role of International Agricultural Research, International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines, October 5-7, 1999. Brkić, I., Šimić, D., Zdunić, Z., Jambrović, A., Ledenčan, T., Kovačević, V., Kadar, I. (2003). Combining abilities of corn-belt inbred lines of maize for mineral content in grain, Maydica, 48, 293-297. Brkić, I., Šimić, D., Zdunić, Z., Jambrović, A. Ledenčan, T. Kovačević, V., Kadar, I. (2004). Genotypic variability of micronutrient element concentrations in maize kernels, Cereal Research Communications 32(1), 107-112. Godo, G.H., Reisenauer, H.M. (1980). Plant effects on soil manganese availability. J. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 44, 993-995. Heckman, J.R., Sims, J.T., Beegle, D.B., Coale, F.J., Herbert, S.J., Bruulsema, T.W., Bamka, W.J. (2003). Nutrient removal by corn grain harvest, Agronomy Journal, 95, 587-591. House, W. A. (1999). Trace element bioavailability as exemplified by iron and zinc. Field Crop Research, 60, 115-141. Mengel, K., Kirkby, E. A. (2001). Principles of plant nutrition. 5th Edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, Boston, London. Kovacevic, V., Schnug, E., Haneklaus, S., Simic, D. (1997). Genetic and environmental influences on micronutrient concentrations in corn (Zea mays L.) plants. In: Fertilization for Sustainable Plant Production and Soil Fertility, Van Cleemput, O. et al. (eds.) Vol. II, CIEC, Braunschweig, Budapest, Vienna, 209-214. Kovacevic, V., Brkic, I., Simic, D., Bukvic, G., Rastija, M. (2004). Role of genotypes on phosphorus, zinc, manganese and iron status and their relations in leaves of maize on hydromorfic soil, Plant, soil and environment, 50, 535-539. Kovačević, V., Šoštarić, J., Josipović, M., Iljkić, D., Marković, M. (2009). Precipitation and temperature regime impacts on maize yields in Eastern Croatia, Journal of Agricultural Sciences (2066-1843) 41, 49-53. Pearson, J. N., Rengel, Z. (1994). Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat, Journal of Experimental Botany, 45(281), 1829-1835. Rastija, M., Kovacevic, V., Rastija, D., Simic, D. (2010). Manganese and zinc concentrations in maize genotypes grown on soils differing in acidity, Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 58(4) Šimić, D., Zdunić, Z., Brkić, I., Kadar, I. (2004). Inheritance of mineral concentrations in kernels of elite maize inbred lines. In: Genetic variation for plant breeding. Johann, V. et al. (eds.) 17th EUCARPIA General Congresss, Wienna, Austria BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Applied Sciences, 485. Zorn, W., Prausse, A. (1993). Manganese content of cereals, maize and beet as indicator of soil acidity, Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde, 156(4), 371-376. 96