Supplementary Online Content

Similar documents
Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Docetaxel (Taxotere )

Supplementary Online Content

Recent advances in the management of metastatic breast cancer in older adults

MAINTENANCE TREATMENT CHEMO MAINTENANCE OR TARGETED OF BOTH? Martin Reck Department of Thoracic Oncology LungenClinic Grosshansdorf

Maintenance paradigm in non-squamous NSCLC

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Lung Cancer William N. William Jr.

Supplementary Online Content

Treatment of EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC

Choosing Optimal Therapy for Advanced Non-Squamous (NS) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Nivolumab (Opdivo) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer June 3, 2016

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Initial Clinical Guidance Report Nivolumab (Opdivo) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer April 1, 2016

KEYTRUDA is also indicated in combination with pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy for the

EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC

Carcinoma de Tiroide: Teràpies Diana

Cancer Cell Research 14 (2017)

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Tumor Growth Rate (TGR) A New Indicator of Antitumor Activity in NETS? IPSEN NET Masterclass Athens, 12 th November 2016

Supplementary Appendix

INMUNOTERAPIA: NUEVO PARADIGMA EN LOS TUMORES DE CABEZA Y CUELLO. Dra. Lara Iglesias H.U.12 Octubre

Practice changing studies in lung cancer 2017

DR LUIS MANSO UNIDAD TUMORES DE MAMA Y GINECOLÓGICOS HOSPITAL 12 DE OCTUBRE MADRID

Post-marketing observational study of Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC treated with daily afatinib (final report)

Targeted Agents as Maintenance Therapy. Karen Kelly, MD Professor of Medicine UC Davis Cancer Center

II sessione. Immunoterapia oltre la prima linea. Alessandro Tuzi ASST Sette Laghi, Varese

Drug Niraparib Olaparib

in combination with cisplatin as first-line doublet 3 as maintenance agent following non-pemetrexed platinum doublet 4

Edith A. Perez, Ahmad Awada, Joyce O Shaughnessy, Hope Rugo, Chris Twelves, Seock-Ah Im, Carol Zhao, Ute Hoch, Alison L. Hannah, Javier Cortes

Maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Egbert F. Smit MD PhD Dept Thoracic Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

INMUNOTERAPIA I. Dra. Virginia Calvo

Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Combination Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Nivolumab: esperienze italiane nel carcinoma polmonare avanzato

Antiangiogenic Agents in NSCLC Where are we? Which biomarkers? VEGF Is the Only Angiogenic Factor Present Throughout the Tumor Life Cycle

PTAC meeting held on 5 & 6 May (minutes for web publishing)

ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol and Results Registration System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 09/30/2015. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT

Background 1. Comparative effectiveness of nintedanib

GASTRIC & PANCREATIC CANCER

Supplementary Online Content

ALK Inhibition: From Biology to Approved Therapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung Cancer Case. Since the patient was symptomatic, a targeted panel was sent. ALK FISH returned in 2 days and was positive.

Cancer Immunotherapy Patient Forum. for the Treatment of Melanoma, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Lung and Genitourinary Cancers - November 7, 2015

AACR 2018 Investor Meeting

Supplementary Online Content

Understanding Clinical Trials

Media Release. Basel, 21 July 2017

New Targeted Agents Demonstrate Greater Efficacy and Tolerability in the Treatment of HER2-positive Breast Cancer

Unmet Need Mucosal and Uveal Melanoma

Medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) in the elderly ( 65y): Position of a SIOG Taskforce

Supplementary Online Content

Do You Think Like the Experts? Refining the Management of Advanced NSCLC With ALK Rearrangement. Reference Slides Introduction

Tumors in the Randomized German AIO study KRK-0306

Supplementary Appendix

Targeted Therapies in Melanoma

Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC

Study Period: 27 March 2008 (first subject enrolled) to 05 May 2010 (data cutoff date for primary analysis)

Bodoky G, Gil-Delgado M, Cascinu S, Lipatov ON, Cunningham D, Van Cutsem E, Muro K, Chandrawansa K, Liepa AM, Carlesi R, Ohtsu A, Wilke H

The next wave of successful drug therapy strategies in HER2-positive breast cancer. Hans Wildiers University Hospitals Leuven Belgium

Squamous Cell Carcinoma Standard and Novel Targets.

PROGNOSTIC AND PREDICTIVE BIOMARKERS IN NSCLC. Federico Cappuzzo Istituto Toscano Tumori Ospedale Civile-Livorno Italy

Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Update

Management Guidelines and Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Oncologist s Perspective

Immunotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma: Where Do We Stand? Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD St. Luke s Cancer Center Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

CheckMate 012: Safety and Efficacy of First Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Treatment of EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC

1 st Appraisal Committee meeting Background & Clinical Effectiveness Gillian Ells & Malcolm Oswald 24/11/2016

MEET ROY*: A PATIENT WITH LIVER-LIMITED mcrc

Post-ASCO 2017 Cancer du sein Triple Négatif

This was a multi-center study conducted at 44 study centers. There were 9 centers in the United States and 35 centers in Europe.

Joachim Aerts Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Netherlands. Drawing the map: molecular characterization of NSCLC

Checkpoint Inibitors for Bladder Cancer

MEET MARY KISQALI PATIENT PROFILES

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Maintenance Therapy for Advanced NSCLC: Which Patients, Which Approach?

Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma. James Larkin

New options for old and new targets in NSCLC Rosario García Campelo Medical Oncology Unit University Hospital A Coruña

Locoregional treatment Session Oral Abstract Presentation Saulo Brito Silva

Immunoconjugates in Both the Adjuvant and Metastatic Setting

Breast cancer update. Iryna Kuchuk, MD Oncology department Meir Medical Center

Conversations in Oncology. November Kerry Hotel Pudong, Shanghai China

COMETS: COlorectal MEtastatic Two Sequences

Eric Van Cutsem University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium

Supplementary Online Content

Immunotherapy in the clinic. Lung Cancer. Marga Majem 20 octubre 2017

The NCPE has issued a recommendation regarding the use of pertuzumab for this indication. The NCPE do not recommend reimbursement of pertuzumab.

Reflex Testing Guidelines for Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Histology independent indications in oncology. The BRAF Story. Yibing Yan PhD Roche / Genentech

Supplementary Online Content

Incorporating biologics in the management of older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Lonnie Moulder, CEO Leerink Global Healthcare Conference February 12, 2015

Take home message. Emilio Bria. II SESSIONE: Immunoterapia nel tumore del polmone

DCC-2618, a novel pan-kit and PDGFR

Enhanced Recovery After Discharge: does it happen?

Transcription:

Supplementary Online Content Jänne PA, van den Heuvel MM, Barlesi F, et al. Effect of selumetinib plus docetaxel compared with docetaxel alone and progression-free survival in patients with KRASmutant advanced non small cell lung cancer: the SELECT-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3438 emethods. Censoring of Patients etable 1. Most Frequently Reported Adverse Events Causally Related to Selumetinib/Placebo etable 2. PD-L1 Subgroup Analysis of Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Events etable 3. Objective Response Rate Analysis by KRAS Mutation Group Status (Next- Generation Sequencing Data) efigure 1. Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of Progression-Free Survival efigure 2. Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of Overall Survival efigure 3. Waterfall Plots of Best Percentage Change in Tumor Size for Target Lesions by Patient in (A) Selumetinib + Docetaxel, and (B) Placebo + Docetaxel Groups efigure 4. Selumetinib (A) and N-Desmethyl Selumetinib Metabolite (B) Plasma Concentration Over Time efigure 5. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Symptom Progression (ASBI) efigure 6. Progression-Free Survival Analysis by KRAS Mutation Subgroup (All Patients With Available Next-Generation Sequencing Data) ereferences. This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

emethods. Censoring of Patients For PFS, patients who had not progressed or died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of the latest assessment date from their last evaluable RECIST 1.1 assessment. However, if the patients experienced disease progression or died after two or more missed visits, they were censored at the time of the latest evaluable RECIST 1.1 assessment. For OS, any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive, prior to the time of data cut-off. For duration of response, if a patient did not progress following a response, then their duration of response was be censored at the PFS censoring time. For time to symptom progression, patients whose symptoms (as measured by ASBI) had not shown a clinically meaningful deterioration (defined as a decrease in the ASBI from baseline as 10) and who were alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of their last LCSS assessment where ASBI could be evaluated. Also, if symptoms progressed or the patient died after two or more missed LCSS assessment visits, the patient was censored at the time of the last LCSS assessment where ASBI could be evaluated. Two missed visits were defined as no assessments within 8 weeks (56 days) of randomization or the previous evaluable assessment. If a patient had no evaluable visits or did not have baseline data they were censored at day 1.

etable 1. Most Frequently Reported Adverse Events Causally Related to selumetinib/placebo Preferred term, No. (%) participants with an event Selumetinib + docetaxel n=251 Placebo + docetaxel n=254 All grades CTCAE grade 3 All grades CTCAE grade 3 Diarrhea 125 (50) 16 (6) 64 (25) 6 (2) Rash 79 (32) 8 (3) 23 (9) 1 (1) Nausea 53 (21) 3 (1) 29 (11) 0 Fatigue 47 (19) 4 (2) 43 (17) 4 (2) Stomatitis 46 (18) 7 (3) 20 (8) 0 Edema peripheral 43 (17) 3 (1) 13 (5) 0 Vomiting 41 (16) 6 (2) 17 (7) 1 (1) Asthenia 33 (13) 12 (5) 24 (9) 2 (1) Decreased appetite 32 (13) 3 (1) 28 (11) 2 (1) Dermatitis 29 (12) 4 (2) 1 (1) 0 acneiform Dry skin 24 (10) 0 12 (5) 0 Neutropenia 18 (7) 14 (6) 8 (3) 4 (2) Anemia 17 (7) 2 (1) 8 (3) 0 Dyspnea 13 (5) 4 (2) 4 (2) 0 Face edema 16 (6) 0 3 (1) 0 Population: safety analysis set, data cut-off 7 June 2016 Adverse events causally related to selumetinib/placebo reported during randomized treatment in 5% of patients in either treatment group, by frequency in selumetinib + docetaxel group. CTCAE, Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse events; No., number of participants

etable 2. PD-L1 Subgroup Analysis of Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Events No. with event/total No. (%) in selumetinib + docetaxel group No. with event/total No. (%) in placebo + docetaxel group Subgroup HR (95% CI) PFS PD-L1 <5% 94/112 (84) 101/112 (90) 0.89 (0.67, 1.18) PD-L1 5% 65/79 (82) 71/82 (87) 0.70 (0.50, 0.99) PD-L1 59/63 (94) 57/62 (92) 1.24 (0.86, 1.79) unknown OS PD-L1 <5% 73/112 (65) 74/112 (66) 0.94 (0.68, 1.30) PD-L1 5% 55/79 (70) 58/82 (71) 0.89 (0.61, 1.28) PD-L1 48/63 (76) 38/62 (61) 1.57 (1.02, 2.41) unknown CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; No., number of participants; PD-L1, Programmed deathligand 1; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival Submitted as part of an abstract published in the IASLC WCLC 2016 abstract book 1

etable 3. Objective Response Rate Analysis by KRAS Mutation Group Status (Next-Generation Sequencing Data) Patients with response, No. with event/total No. (%) Difference between Mutation group Selumetinib + docetaxel Placebo + docetaxel groups in ORR, % (IQR) Odds ratio (95% CI) Mutation group 1 35/152 (23) 18/149 (12) 11 (1.9-19.9) 2.27 (1.22, 4.34) Mutation group 2 13/94 (14) 16/101 (16) -2 (-12.7-8.9) 0.83 (0.37, 1.86) Mutation group 1, Kras G12C or G12V; mutation group 2, all other KRAS mutations. Objective response rate is the proportion of patients with at least one visit response of complete response or partial response using investigative site assessments according to RECIST 1.1 CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; No., number of participants; ORR, objective response rate; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

efigure 1. Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of Progression-Free Survival Population: full analysis set, data cut-off 7 June 2016; HRs were not calculated for sub-groups with fewer than 10 events; all analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Progression includes deaths in the absence of RECIST progression. Progression events occurring 14 weeks after last evaluable assessment (or randomization) are censored and therefore excluded Data-marker size reflects number of patients analyzed; error bars indicate 95% confidence limits for HR; vertical band corresponds to 95% confidence limits for the HR for all patients *First-line therapy was included as an eligibility criterion, however patients who received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy and developed a recurrence, with evidence of Stage IIIB to IV disease within 6 months of completing chemotherapy, could be eligible CI, confidence interval; DOC, docetaxel; HR, hazard ratio; KRAS, v-ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog; No., number of participants; PBO, placebo; PD-L1, Programmed death-ligand 1; PFS, progression-free survival; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; SEL, selumetinib; WHO PS, World Health Organization performance status

efigure 2. Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of Overall Survival Population: full analysis set, data cut-off 7 June 2016; HRs were not calculated for sub-groups with fewer than 10 events; all analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model Data-marker size reflects number of patients analyzed; error bars indicate 95% confidence limits for HR; vertical band corresponds to 95% confidence limits for the HR for all patients *First-line therapy was included as an eligibility criterion, however patients who received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy and developed a recurrence, with evidence of Stage IIIB to IV disease within 6 months of completing chemotherapy, could be eligible CI, confidence interval; DOC, docetaxel; HR, hazard ratio; KRAS, v-ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog; No., number of participants; OS, overall survival; PBO, placebo; PD-L1, Programmed death-ligand 1; SEL, selumetinib; WHO PS, World Health Organization Performance Status

efigure 3. Waterfall Plots of Best Percentage Change in Tumor Size for Target Lesions by Patient in (A) Selumetinib + Docetaxel, and (B) Placebo + docetaxel Groups Population: patients with measurable disease at baseline who underwent follow-up scan, and had specific KRAS mutation sub-type determined by NGS analysis (selumetinib + docetaxel, n=206; placebo + docetaxel, n= 212); data cut-off 7 June 2016. Patients with indeterminate KRAS mutation subtypes were excluded. RECIST 1.1 partial response: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; complete response: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. *includes all other G12 and G13 KRAS mutation sub-types other than G12A, G12C, G12D, and G12V NGS, next-generation sequencing; RECIST: response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

efigure 4. Selumetinib (A) and N-desmethyl Selumetinib Metabolite (B) Plasma Concentration over Time

efigure 5. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Symptom Progression (ASBI) Only patients with a baseline ASBI score of 90 are included. This analysis was performed using stratified log-rank test with factors for World Health Organization performance status; crosses denote censored observations. HR, CI, and two-sided p-value are calculated using the stratified log-rank test ASBI, average symptom burden index; DOC, docetaxel; PBO, placebo; SEL, selumetinib

efigure 6. Progression-Free Survival Analysis by KRAS mutation Subgroup (All Patients with Available Next-Generation Sequencing Data) *Includes all G12 and G13 KRAS subtypes other than G12A, G13C, G12D and G12V Data-marker size reflects number of patients analyzed; error bars indicate 95% confidence limits for HR; vertical band corresponds to 95% confidence limits for the HR from the SELECT-1 primary analysis (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.12) Mutation group 1, KRAS G12C or G12V; mutation group 2, all other KRAS mutations CI, confidence interval; DOC, docetaxel; HR, hazard ratio; KRAS, v-ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog; No., number of participants; PBO, placebo; SEL, selumetinib

ereferences 1. Jänne P, Van den Heuvel M, Barlesi F, et al. Impact of PD-L1 Status on Clinical Response in SELECT-1: Selumetinib + Docetaxel in KRASm Advanced NSCLC. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2016;12(1; supplement):s952 S953.