Effect of Saxagliptin on Renal Outcomes in the SAVOR TIMI- 53 study- Appendixes:

Similar documents
egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Supplementary Appendix

Acarbose Decreases the Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk of Diabetic Patients and. Attenuates the Incidence and Severity of Collagen-induced Arthritis in Mice

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. Supplementary Figure S1. Cohort definition flow chart.

Risk factors for metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency and its association with peripheral neuropathy in T2DM patients

Rationale: Objectives: Indication: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Study Investigators/Centers: 300 physicians in 292 clinics Research Methods: Data Source:

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

Joslin Diabetes Center Joslin Diabetes Forum 2013: The Impact of Comorbidities on Glucose Control Scenario 2: Reduced Renal Function

Predicting and changing the future for people with CKD

Chapter Two Renal function measures in the adolescent NHANES population

Updates in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Management: Are You Making the Link?

Sect S io ecn ti 1 o : n Trend 1: Tres nds

Objectives. Kidney Complications With Diabetes. Case 10/21/2015

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

No Increased Cardiovascular Risk for Lixisenatide in ELIXA

Gli endpoint micro-vascolari nei trial di outcome cardiovascolare

Cardiologists and HbA1c: Novel Diabetes Drugs and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes

Section 1: 1: Trends. Section 2: 2: Comparisons to to Overall Portland Area Area Results for for

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Table 1. Criteria for selection of normal control individuals among healthy volunteers

CKDinform: A PCP s Guide to CKD Detection and Delaying Progression

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Supplementary Online Content

The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial: Design and results. David Fitchett, MD University of Toronto, Canada

Supplementary material

Diabetes Audit Results, Portland Area, Site-Specific Trends

Renal tubular secretion in chronic kidney disease: description, determinants, and outcomes. Astrid M Suchy-Dicey

Supplementary Table 1. Baseline Characteristics by Quintiles of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures

CKD & HT. Anne-Marie Angus

Lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients with type 2

Hypoinsulinemia is strongly associated with coronary artery calcification (CAC) assessed by multislice computed tomography

Supplementary Appendix

Diabetes and Heart Failure: The Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors

Supplementary appendix

Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

Section 1: 1: Trends. Section 2: 2: Comparisons to to Overall Portland Area Area Results for for

Cardiovascular Management of a Patient with Diabetes

LEPTIN AS A NOVEL PREDICTOR OF DEPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH THE METABOLIC SYNDROME

Supplementary Information. Statins Improve Long Term Patency of Arteriovenous Fistula for

>4000 mg/dl (=20000/(500/100)) >615 mmol/l (=20000/(65*0.5))

Diabete: terapia nei pazienti a rischio cardiovascolare

1. Albuminuria an early sign of glomerular damage and renal disease. albuminuria

Dapagliflozin and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from DECLARE-TIMI 58

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

TYP 2 DIABETES. Marc Donath

Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Patient Assistance Program in Diabetes Care

Dr Karen McNeil Consultant Endocrinologist

Status of the CKD and ESRD treatment: Growth, Care, Disparities

Diabetes Mellitus: Implications of New Clinical Trials and New Medications

SCIENTIFIC STUDY REPORT

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

KEEP Summary Figures S40. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(3)(suppl 2):S40-S64

Race Original cohort Clean cohort HR 95%CI P HR 95%CI P. <8.5 White Black

Effects of Lowering LDL Cholesterol on Progression of Kidney Disease

University of Groningen. Evaluation of renal end points in nephrology trials Weldegiorgis, Misghina Tekeste

Supplementary Information for: Predictors of chronic kidney disease in type 1 diabetes: a longitudinal study from the AMD Annals initiative.

Analytical Methods: the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) The Kidney Early Evaluation program (KEEP) is a free, community based health

New Drug Evaluation: lixisenatide injection, subcutaneous

The Latest Generation of Clinical

KEEP Summary Figures S32. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(3)(suppl 2):S32-S56

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Nothing to disclose

Have you seen a patient like Elaine *?

Metabolic Syndrome and Chronic Kidney Disease

Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.

CANVAS Program Independent commentary

Learning and Earning with Gateway Professional Education CME/CEU Webinar Series. Diabetes Update July 6, :00pm 1:00pm

Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2

ISN Mission: Advancing the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of kidney diseases in the developing and developed world

ALLHAT. ALLHAT Antihypertensive Trial Results by Baseline Diabetic & Fasting Glucose Status

Diabetic Kidney Disease Tripti Singh MD Department of Nephrology University of Wisconsin

Effect of Saxagliptin on Renal Outcomes in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial

Update on Cardiovascular Outcome Trials in Diabetes Jay S. Skyler, MD, MACP

Soo LIM, MD, PHD Internal Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Case study: Lean adult with no complications, newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes

Management of Hypertension in the Diabetic Patient:

Narender Goel et al. Middletown Medical PC, Montefiore Medical Center & Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York

COMMISSIONING POLICY RECOMMENDATION TREATMENT ADVISORY GROUP Policy agreed by (Vale of York CCG/date)

Resistant hypertension (RH), that is, blood pressure (BP)

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Adult Diabetes Clinician Guide NOVEMBER 2017

Kidney and heart: dangerous liaisons. Luis M. RUILOPE (Madrid, Spain)

Update Diabetes Therapie. Marc Y Donath

Can We Reduce Heart Failure by Treating Diabetes? CVOT Data on SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1Receptor Agonists

Val-MARC: Valsartan-Managing Blood Pressure Aggressively and Evaluating Reductions in hs-crp

COPYRIGHT. Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: What To Do When Treatment with Metformin is Inadequate? Can We Achieve Therapeutic Goals More Safely?

KEEP 2009 Summary Figures

Managing Chronic Kidney Disease: Reducing Risk for CKD Progression

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

KEEP S u m m a r y F i g u r e s. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Vol 53, No 4, Suppl 4, 2009:pp S32 S44.

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Long-term study of the association of adipokines and glucose variability with diabetic complications

Diabetic Kidney Disease Tripti Singh MD Department of Nephrology University of Wisconsin

CURRENT CONTROVERSIES IN DIABETES CARE

Can Treating Diabetes with SGLT2 inhibitors Prevent Heart Failure?

Non-insulin treatment in Type 1 DM Sang Yong Kim

Preventing Serious Health Consequences of Type 2 Diabetes

Eugene Barrett M.D., Ph.D. University of Virginia 6/18/2007. Diagnosis and what is it Glucose Tolerance Categories FPG

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Heather Corn, MD, MS Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism

Transcription:

Effect of Saxagliptin on Renal Outcomes in the SAVOR TIMI- 53 study- Appendixes: Appendix Table 1: Number and % of patients at the saxagliptin and placebo arms, according to egfr and on treatment ACR groups at, 1 year, and EOT n (% from ACR by treatment arm) 1 year EOT ACR<30 Mg/G 30 ACR 300 Mg/G ACR>300 Mg/G saxagliptin placebo saxagliptin placebo saxagliptin placebo 4365 (65.3%) 3847 (68.7%) 3311 (65.8%) 4326 (65.2%) 3566 (65.3%) 3063 (62.9%) 1805 (27.0%) 1333 (23.8%) 1328 (26.4%) 1819 (27.4%) 1454 (26.6%) 1379 (28.3%) 513 (7.7%) 418 (7.5%) 390 (7.8%) 491 (7.4%) 442 (8.1%) 427 (8.8%) n (% from ACR by treatment arm) 1 year EOT 30 egfr 50 ml/min/bsa ACR<30 Mg/G 30 ACR 300 Mg/G ACR>300 Mg/G saxagliptin placebo saxagliptin placebo saxagliptin placebo 470 (44.0%) 357 (42.9%) 295 (41.7%) 474 (44.8%) 369 (46.2%) 279 (41.0%) 362 (33.9%) 313 (37.6%) 265 (37.5%) 346 (32.7%) 253 (31.7%) 230 (33.8%) 237 (22.2%) 162 (19.5%) 147 (20.8%) 239 (22.6%) 177 (22.2%) 172 (25.3%) n (% from ACR by treatment arm) ACR<30 Mg/G 30 ACR 300 Mg/G ACR>300 Mg/G saxagliptin placebo saxagliptin placebo saxagliptin placebo 32 (19.5%) 29 (19.5%) 50 (30.5%) 23 26 47 1 year (19.2%) (23.2%) (39.2%) 20 18 39 EOT (19.6%) (20.5%) (38.2%) (Abbreviations: BSA Body Surface area per 1.73 m 2 ) 44 (29.5%) 28 (25.0%) 27 (30.7%) 82 (50.0%) 50 (41.7%) 43 (42.2%) 76 (51.0%) 58 (51.8%) 43 (48.9%)

Appendix Table 2: Multivariable Analysis of the association between variables and ACR and egfr as continuous variable at Multivariable Modeling for log(acr) (mg/g) at Multivariable Modeling for egfr (ml/min/bsa) at Variable* Coefficient 95% CI P-value Coefficient 95% CI P-value Age (increase by a year) 0.0015 (-0.0019, 0.0050) 0.3855-0.7425 (-0.7838, -0.7011) <.0001 Sex (Male vs. Female) NS 5.0366 (4.3397, 5.7334) <.0001 Race (Caucasian vs. all other) -0.3712 (-0.4348, -0.3076) <.0001-0.7842 (-1.5914, 0.0230) 0.0569 Hispanic or Latino (vs. not) 0.3113 (0.2456, 0.3770) <.0001 3.0296 (2.2090, 3.8501) <.0001 BMI (kg/m2) NS -0.2121 (-0.2735, -0.1506) <.0001 Duration of diabetes (for each extra year) 0.0184 (0.0151, 0.0218) <.0001-0.1087 (-0.1497, -0.0677) <.0001 Current smoker NS 3.1464 (2.1880, 4.1049) <.0001 History of CVD 0.2050 (0.1411, 0.2689) <.0001-1.4584 (-2.2857, -0.6311) 0.0005 HbA1C% (unit increase in HbA1c) 0.1857 (0.1618, 0.2097) <.0001 0.4320 (0.1374, 0.7266) 0.0041 Fasting PG (mg/dl for each unit increase) 0.0010 (0.0005, 0.0016) 0.0003 0.0179 (0.0109, 0.0248) <.0001 egfr (ml/min/bsa) -0.0151 (-0.0164, -0.0138) <.0001 ACR (analyzed on a log scale for each percentage point increase for the ACR, the GFR decreases by 2.7) NA -2.3757 (-2.5662, -2.1851) <.0001 ACE inhibitors 0.0780 (0.0157, 0.1403) 0.0141 NS ARBs 0.2455 (0.1764, 0.3146) <.0001-1.8087 (-2.5251, -1.0924) <.0001 Β-Blockers NS -2.9851 (-3.6860, -2.2841) <.0001 Statin NS -1.0403 (-1.8543, -0.2264) 0.0122 Aspirin NS NS Sulfonylurea -0.0303 (-0.0881, 0.0276) 0.3055-0.9703 (-1.6753, -0.2654) 0.0070 Metformin -0.0340 (-0.0943, 0.0262) 0.2687 7.8730 (7.1487, 8.5973) <.0001 Insulin 0.2701 (0.2045, 0.3356) <.0001-1.6524 (-2.4561, -0.8488) <.0001 Thiazolidinediones -0.0571 (-0.1682, 0.054) 0.3138 NS (Abbreviations: BSA Body Surface area per 1.73 m 2 )

ACR (Mg/G) at Appendix Table 3: Change in categorical ACR (<15mg/g, >=15 and<30 mg/g, 30-<100 mg/g, 100-300 mg/g, >300 mg/g) from to EOT by ACR categories and treatment arms ACR (Mg/G) at EOT SAXAGLIPTIN PLACEBO <15 15- <30 30- <100 100-300 >300 <15 15- <30 30- <100 100-300 >300 <15 P*= 0.019 2204 75.5% 410 14.0% 246 8.4% 43 1.5% 17 0.6% 2056 72.8% 447 15.8% 247 8.7% 60 2.1% 15 0.5% 15-<30 P**= 0.090 323 39.2% 215 26.1% 219 26.6% 47 5.7% 19 2.3% 273 33.5% 217 26.6% 260 31.9% 50 6.1% 16 2.0% 30-<100 P**<0.001 100-300 P**=0.043 >300 P***=0.049 193 18.5% 38 7.3% 13 2.4% 181 17.4% 39 7.5% 10 1.9% 434 41.6% 137 26.4% 45 8.4% 184 17.6% 174 33.6% 103 19.3% 51 4.9% 130 25.1% 363 68.0% 144 14.5% 25 4.9% 9 1.8% 159 16.1% 24 4.7% 6 1.2% 395 39.9% 136 26.4% 28 5.7% 205 20.7% 168 32.6% 87 17.7% 87 8.8% 162 31.5% 362 73.6% *P-value is based on a two tailed normal distribution approximation test for the proportion of patients who worsened ** P-value is based on a chi-squared test for independence ***P-value is based on a two tailed normal distribution approximation test for the proportion of patients who improved P-values were calculated for each level of ACR at separately. White: The number of patients (%) at each ACR category at, with no change in ACR category to EOT. Very Light Green: The number of patients (%) at each ACR category at, with improvement in one ACR category to EOT. Light Green: The number of patients (%) at each ACR category at, with improvement in two ACR categories to EOT. Moderate Green: The number of patients (%) at each ACR category at, with improvement in three ACR categories to EOT. Dark Green: The number of patients (%) at each ACR category at, with improvement in four ACR categories to EOT.

Very Light Red: The number of patients (%) at each ACR category at, with worsening in one ACR category to EOT. Light Red: The number of patients (%) at each ACR category at, with worsening in two ACR categories to EOT. Moderate Red: The number of patients (%) at each ACR category at, with worsening in three ACR categories to EOT. Dark Red: The number of patients (%) at each ACR category at, with worsening in four ACR categories to EOT.

Appendix Figure 1: Percentage of patients at the different on treatment ACR (at Baseline, 1year and EOT) categories out of the patients at egfr category 7.5% 27.2% 22.4% 33.3% 50.5% ACR<30 Mg/G 30 ACR 300 Mg/G ACR>300 Mg/G 65.3% 44.4% 30.0% 19.5% 30 egfr 50 ml/min/bsa egfr at 7.8% 25.2% 20.8% 34.7% 46.6% ACR<30 Mg/G 30 ACR 300 Mg/G ACR>300 Mg/G 67.0% 44.5% 32.3% 21.1% 30 egfr 50 ml/min/bsa egfr at 8.3% 27.3% 23.0% 35.7% 45.3% ACR<30 Mg/G 30 ACR 300 Mg/G ACR>300 Mg/G 64.4% 41.4% 34.7% 20.0% 30 egfr 50 ml/min/bsa egfr at

Cumulative Proportion Cumulative Proportion Appendix Figure 2: Density charts for change of ACR from to 1 year and EOT, by treatment arms* A- 1 year placebo saxagliptin change from to 1 year 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 P<0.0001 0-100 -80-60 -40-20 0 20 change in ACR mg/g 40 60 80 100 B- EOT placebo saxagliptin change from to EOT 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 P<0.0001 0-100 -80-60 -40-20 0 20 change in ACR mg/g 40 60 80 100 (For visualization purposes the graph was drawn with change in ACR values cut-off between -100 and 100)