CIFOR Foodborne Disease Response Guidelines

Similar documents
Performance Indicators for Foodborne Disease Programs

CDC Update Laura G. Brown, Ph.D. National Center for Environmental Health

Position Statement Template

CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 6: Initial Steps of an Investigation

Council for Outbreak Response: Healthcare-Associated Infections & Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens (CORHA) HICPAC December 1, 2016

Surveillance and outbreak response are major components

Evaluation of Tennessee Foodborne Illness and Outbreak Response Using the Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak and Response (CIFOR) Metrics

Nashville, Tennessee. Assignment Description

Council for Outbreak Response: Healthcare-Associated Infections Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens

CIFOR performance measure Measurement methods Target Range Minnesota 2013 Performance 1. Foodborne illness complaint reporting system:

Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (CIFOR) Update

E-learning on Foodborne Illness Outbreak Environmental Assessments

Infectious Diseases - Foodborne, Tennessee Department of Health, Communicable and Environmental Disease Services Assignment Description

Table 1: Training Topics that over 50% of respondents identified as important a

Welcome to the PulseNet/OutbreakNet West Coast Regional Meeting

Food Safety Needs Assessment for Environmental Health Officials New York Integrated Food Safety Center of Excellence

Food Safety Needs Assessment for Epidemiology Officials New York Integrated Food Safety Center of Excellence

Food Safety Guest Speaker Evaluations Viewer Call-In Phone: Fax: Thank You to our Sponsors February 18, 2010

FDA Sampling Guidance and Practices. Terri McConnell FDA/ORA/Office of Regulatory Science

CIFOR GUIDELINES FOR FOODBORNE ILLNESS COMPLAINT SYSTEMS

ESR Epidemiological Skills Development Programme. Module 1.2 Effective Case Investigation Course. Course Outline. Toby Regan

Draft National Voluntary Environmental Assessment Information System: Strengthening the Role of Food-Safety Programs in Foodborne Disease Surveillance

APril PUlseNet

Non-Infectious Diseases (Cross-Cutting), Infectious Diseases County of Marin, Health & Human Services. San Rafael, California. Assignment Description

School Dismissal Monitoring Revised Protocol Overview July 30, 2009

Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies To Prevent Foodborne Illness

The PulseNet Cost Benefit Study and Beyond: What We Have Learned & Where We Are Headed for Molecular Enteric Surveillance

B. Generalized CIFOR Guidelines for implementing foodborne illness complaint systems

An Introduction CORE Network

Welcome to the PulseNet/OutbreakNet Central Regional Meeting

Preparing For Pandemic Influenza: What the CDC and HHS Recommend You Can Do

Conference for Food Protection Committee FINAL Report Template approved: 04/20/2016

The Role of USDA s Food Safety and Inspection Service to Ensure Foodborne Disease Control and Prevention

Welcome. CDC Science Seminar Partnering for Medical Countermeasures. Brought to you by the Northwest Preparedness & Emergency Response Learning Center

New Mexico Emerging Infections Program Overview. Joan Baumbach NM Department of Health September 23, 2016

OVERVIEW OF FOOD SAFETY REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES. Presented By William C. Balek International Sanitary Supply Association March 30, 2001

Mahoning County Public Health. Epidemiology Response Annex

Welcome to the PulseNet/OutbreakNet East Coast Regional Meeting

Food Emergency Response Plans Development, Implementation and Integration with the CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response

The power of information to prevent foodborne illness

A Systems Approach for Responding to Foodborne Hazards and Illness Outbreaks in Ontario

Rapid Response Team (RRT) Program Update AFDO Food Emergency Response & Outbreak Committee June 10, 2018

The detection and spread of pandemic 2009

Overview and Findings from ASTHO s IIS Interstate Data Sharing Meeting

Introduction. Future U.S. initiatives regarding the food safety for fresh produce. FoodNet Partners. FoodNet Partners

Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response

Food Safety Federal Efforts to Protect Public Health

Victoria Salin, Senarath Darmasena, Alex Wong, and Ping Luo Texas A&M University Contact:

Cloud Computing Federal Perspective. Desiree Mustaquim Surveillance Epidemiologist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Influenza Division

LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP. Food Recall Process. Cecilia M. Wolyniak Food and Drug Administration Office of Enforcement

Flu on Call TM : Improving Access to Medical Care in a Severe Influenza Pandemic: Centers Play a Vital Role

Why Exercise? FEMA Introduction to Exercise Design

2009-H1N1 Pandemic Influenza: DHS Perspective

FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) January 4, 2011

October 9-11, Are you ready to export your food products to North America?

Cover Sheet for Example Documentation

Simplified Modeling Framework for Microbial Food-Safety Risk Assessments

Leveraging Current Opportunities to Communicate Lessons Learned from Root Cause Analysis to Prevent Foodborne Illness Outbreaks

Infectious Diseases-HAI Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Public Health Boise, Idaho. Assignment Description

09-ID-67. Committee: Infectious. Title: Public Health Reporting and National Notification for Typhoid Fever. I. Statement of the Problem

Interstate Interfacility Transport of a Patient with

School-based influenza vaccination

Food Safety and Inspection Service ~~ Update ~~

8. Public Health Measures

720 cases. 20 states. Conflict of Interest Declaration. New England Compounding Center (NECC) timeline. (NECC) timeline (continued) 3/28/2013

IRB Policy 5 Research Activities

Conducting Effective Emergency Management Tabletops, Drills and Other Exercises

127,839 hospitalizations. [Jan ].

How Being Trauma-Informed Improves Criminal Justice System Responses

Pennsylvania Pre-Disaster Recovery Plan

Infectious Diseases New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Division of Disease Control (Bureau of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control)

THE STATE OF TOBACCO CONTROL LAW & POLICY THE NATIONAL LANDSCAPE OF FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATION

ICH M4E(R2): Revised Guideline on Common Technical Document -- Efficacy

Flu for Thought II Human Influenza Pandemic Exercise

NIDA Rationale Clean 1 09/17/06

California s Experiences Using Tuberculosis Whole Genome Sequencing

GenomeTrakr database: WGS network for foodborne pathogen traceback

Ask the Experts Virtual Session. Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) February 17, 2017

Re: Trust for America s Health Comments on Biennial Implementation Plan for the National Health Security Strategy

Title: Public Health Reporting and National Notification for Shigellosis

Training Objectives. Describe the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) Identify why, when, where and how a POD is activated

Preparedness 101: Promotion, Funding, and the Future

Planning for Action at the Local Level

Moving Integrated HIV Prevention and Care Planning into Action: Integrated Funding for HIV Services. Wednesday, June 13, :00 p.m. 4:00 p.m.

Understanding the Public Health Significance of Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli. Betsy Booren, Ph.D. Director, Scientific Affairs

Emergency Use Authorizations

Module 4: Emergencies: Prevention, Preparedness, Response and Recovery

CDC Prepares Special Issue August 2006

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2013 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

Infectious Diseases Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau of Epidemiology and Population Health Assignment Description

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff

Food Safety and Inspection Service: Food Safety and Inspection Service Click to edit Master title style

Panel on Defining Healthy and Natural

Association of Public Health Laboratories

Business Continuity and Crisis Management. Cardinal Health s Approach

September 1, The Honorable Tom Price, MD Secretary Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20201

Health Officer Order

3005 Substance Abuse and Tobacco Control. 1. Scope

Environmental, Health and Safety

California s Experiences Using Tuberculosis Whole Genome Sequencing

Transcription:

CIFOR Foodborne Disease Response Guidelines Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (CIFOR) Don Sharp/George Nakamura 2009 NEHA AEC/Atlanta June 24, 2009 Session Summary Purpose and Intent for Guidelines Target Audience Development Process Overview of Guidelines Next Steps Questions and Discussion CIFOR Created to help develop model programs and processes that will facilitate the investigation and control of foodborne disease outbreaks. Goal is to improve performance and coordination of local, state and federal agencies involved in foodborne disease outbreaks Participants -- ASTHO, NACCHO, CSTE, NEHA, AFDO, CDC, FDA, USDA/FSIS, APHL, and NASDA. 1

Guidelines Purpose and Intent To aid governmental agencies that are responsible for preventing and managing foodborne disease To serve as a foundational resource for anyone involved in food safety programs To harmonize foodborne disease investigation work across all agencies Not intended to replace existing procedure manuals Target Audience Primary audience is agencies at the local and state level, since these organizations carry out the majority of foodborne disease outbreak investigations in the United States. Also intended to provide support to the federal public health and regulatory agencies that have critical roles in the country s food safety infrastructure. Development Process CIFOR identified a workgroup to take responsibility for the development of the draft, a group of technical experts to provide support and guidance, and a lead author to coordinate the overall effort and merge and revise all elements. 2

Workgroup Members John Besser, MN DOH Subha Chandar, NACCHO Nausheen Saeed, NACCHO Jack Guzewich, FDA Tim Jones, TN DOH Maria Rishoi, NACCHO Michele Samarya-Timm, Franklin Township Health Dept., NJ Scott Seys, FSIS, USDA Don Sharp, CDC Jennifer Lemmings, CSTE Marion Aller, FL DOA Lakesha Robinson, CSTE Carol Hooker, Hennepin County Health Dept., MN Ian Williams, CDC Kristen Larson, DHMH, MD Adam Reichardt, ASTHO Technical Advisors Paul Blake Richard Hoffman Dennis Perrotta Jeanette Stehr-Green Craig Hedberg Overall Coordination Jac Davies Development Process Conducted literature review and collection of existing guidelines Created draft table of contents Conducted 19 key informant interviews Created language to describe audience and purpose Conducted a round table discussion at 2007 annual CSTE conference 3

Development Process Identified technical experts to serve as leads Created chapter drafts Drafts reviewed and modified by workgroup, CIFOR and external review group Presented for public review and comment in 2008 Further review and modifications by workgroup and CIFOR members based on comments Finalized and approved by CIFOR in March, 2009 General Comments Comprehensive but not stand-alone Detailed information and recommendations Model practices To be developed -- tools and training to support agencies that want to use the Guidelines Table of Contents 1. Overview of CIFOR Guidelines 2. Fundamental Concepts 3. Planning and Preparation 4. Surveillance and Detection 5. Investigation 6. Control Measures 7. Multi-jurisdictional Outbreaks 8. Performance Indicators 9. Legal Issues 4

1. Overview of Guidelines Provides an executive summary with a brief review of key points from each chapter Includes chapter numbers to allow quick reference or linking to detailed sections throughout the Guidelines 2. Fundamental Concepts of Public Health Surveillance and Foodborne Disease Trends in diet and the food industry Surveillance of foodborne disease within the broader public health surveillance context Basic concepts in foodborne disease and disease transmission 3. Planning and Preparation Agency Roles Outbreak Investigation and Control Team Necessary Resources Records Management Communication Planning for Recovery and Follow-up Legal Framework Escalation Incident Command System 5

4. Surveillance and Detection Pathogen-Specific Surveillance Processes, strengths, limitations, model practices Cluster follow-up Notification/Complaint Systems Processes, strengths, limitations, model practices Syndromic Surveillance Processes, strengths, limitations 5. Investigation Characteristics of Outbreak Investigations Outbreak Investigation Procedures Each investigation step described with recommended practices Roles of epidemiology, environmental health and laboratory personnel described for each investigation step 6. Control Measures Information-Based Decision-Making Control of Source Non-specific and specific control measures Control of Transmission Communication End of Outbreak Debriefing Outbreak Report Future Studies and Research 6

7. Multi-Jurisdictional Outbreaks Categories of Multi-Jurisdictional Investigations Key Indicators and Notification Steps Coordination of Multi-Jurisdictional Investigations Outbreak Detection and Investigation by Level (Local, State and Federal) After-Action Reports and Reporting to EFORS (Electronic Foodborne Outbreak Reporting System) 8. Performance Indicators Overall Foodborne Disease Program Objectives and Indicators Short, intermediate and long-term Including sub-indicators and metrics Key Performance Indicators and Metrics for Program Evaluation By local and state health departments By overall food program and individually for epidemiology, environmental health and laboratory Benchmark Data Established by EDITS (Enteric Diseases Investigation Timelines Study) 9. Legal Issues Legal Framework for Mandatory Disease Reporting Legal Framework for Surveillance and Investigation of Foodborne and Enteric Diseases Legal Framework for Measures and Methods to Prevent or Mitigate Foodborne Disease Oubreaks Public Health Investigations as the Basis for Regulatory Actions or Criminal Prosecution 7

Next Steps Presentation of Guidelines at meetings of public health and food safety professional organizations Publication and announcement through professional journals Making available hard copy and on-line versions Development of training and tools to support use of Guidelines Establishment of processes for on-going review and revision over time Questions and Discussion Thank you! 8