Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Integrated Bridge Systems (IBS) John Bowders University of Missouri

Similar documents
Geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments

Grade separated interchange at the intersection of U.S. Hwy 17 Bypass and Farrow Parkway

Modified Sheet Pile Abutment for Low-Volume Road Bridge

Monitored Displacements of a Unique Geosynthetic-Reinforced Walls Supporting Bridge and Approaching Roadway Structures

A Tale of Two Bridges: Comparison between the Seismic Performance of Flexible and Rigid Abutments

DATA GATHERING AND DESIGN DETAILS OF AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGE

Technology. Reinforced Earth Wall Typical Section. Traffic Barrier. Roadway. Select Granular Material. Facing Panel Random Backfill.

SEPTEMBER, 2006 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 7-0(1) CHAPTER 7 PAVEMENT DESIGN

research report Field Measurements on Skewed Semi-Integral Bridge With Elastic Inclusion: Instrumentation Report

DESIGN ASSESSMENT OF THE FOUNDERS/MEADOWS GRS ABUTMENT STRUCTURE

Modular Steel Bridges. Stark County Fischer Bridge Bottineau County Oak Creek Bridge

Ahmed Mongi, M.S., P.E. Engineering Division

Novel treatment technique

Appendix B. Shallow Foundations Report

Long Term Monitoring of a Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System (GRS IBS)

Three Bridges at I-64/Mercury Boulevard Interchange in Hampton, VA

Figure 3: Analytic procedure

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE FEASIBILITY STUDY OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SOIL INTEGRATED BRIDGE SYSTEMS (GRS-IBS) IN OKLAHOMA A THESIS

Bengt H. Fellenius. Wick Drains and Piling for Cai Mep Container Port, Vietnam, and the true cost of 5 cent per foot. Amsterdam.

Integral bridges and environmental conditions

Wick Drains and Piling for Cai Mep Container Port, Vietnam. Bengt H. Fellenius. Sower's Lecture Atlanta May 8, 2012

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CRANE LAKE ROAD OVER HAWKINSON CREEK ST. LOUIS COUNTY

Monitoring and Evaluation of Alabama s First Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil- Integrated Bridge System

State-Aid Bridge News August 2, 2005

3/18/03 CE Keith P. Brabant, P.E.

Development of Abutment Design Standards for Local Bridge Designs Volume 1 of 3

Modified Sheet Pile Abutments for Low-Volume Road Bridges

Effect of Pile Orientation in Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges

Rebuilding and widening the 54- year-old Jane Addams Memorial Tollway into a state-of-the-art corridor linking Rockford to Elgin (three lanes) and

Integral Abutment Bridges-Development of Soil Model for Soil Structure Interaction in Time History Analysis

Experimental and Analytical Investigation of UHPC Pile-to-Abutment Connections

An Integral Abutment Bridge with Precast Concrete Piles

OVER US 6 LATERAL BRIDGE SLIDE: I-75

Conditional assessment of Kiri Bridge in Shkoder, Albania

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN

Semi-Integral Abutment Bridges

Integral Abutment Bridge Design with Soil Structure Interaction

Numerical analysis of the embedded abutments of integral bridges

Thermal Response of Integral Abutment Bridges With Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls

Integral Abutment Bridges Australian and US Practice

Update on Seismic Behavior and Design of

ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: THE REPLACEMENT OF MD 362 OVER MONIE CREEK

STATE ROUTE 30 OVER BESSEMER AVE. SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT IN 57 HOURS

ACCELERATED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

Fort Goff Creek Bridge R04 ABC Project. Dorie Mellon, PE Structure Policy & Innovation Division of Engineering Services Caltrans May 20, 2015

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2008/11. Final Report. Robert J. Frosch Michael E. Kreger Aaron M. Talbott

IL 115 OVER GAR CREEK ACCELERATED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT. Chad Hodel, S.E., P.E. (WHKS) Stan Kaderbek, S.E., P.E. (Milhouse)

Architect/Contractor/QS/Sub-Contractor/C of W/RE/File ref PiMS Documents Site Visit Report. Item Text Action on

APPENDIX A INTEGRAL ABUTMENTS

STONY PLAIN REGION GEOHAZARD RISK ASSESSMENT SITE INSPECTION FORM HIGHWAY AND KM: Hwy 621:02, km 16.39

Appendix C Guidelines for Design of Integral Abutments March 3, 2003

Introduction. Substructure Inspection and Rating. Introduction. Introduction 28/03/2017

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

IBRIDGE 1.0 USER MANUAL

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOR OF RC PARAPET WALL OF ABUTMENT UNDER COLLISION

Bahavior and Analysis of an Integral Abutment Bridge

The UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters!

FIELD INSTRUMENTATIONS AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SOIL INTEGRATED BRIDGE SYSTEM (GRS-IBS)

Forces in Wingwalls from Thermal Expansion of Skewed Semi-Integral Bridges

2007 Niigata Chuetsu-oki Earthquake, Field Reconnaissance Report

BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGE

STUDY OF THE REASONS THAT INDUCE CRACKS AT BRIDGE DECK END

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 6 OVER A BRANCH OF THE CALDWELL CREEK DISTRICT 1 - KOOCHICHING COUNTY

Retrofit to improve earthquake performance of bridge abutment slopes

2011 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

Numerical Modeling of the Performance of Highway Bridge Approach Slabs. Gregory S. Rajek

Overturning Forces at Bridge Abutments and the Interaction of Horizontal Forces from Adjacent Roadways

Comparative Study of Behaviour of Integral and Bearing Type Bridge under Temperature Loading

EAH 422 ADVANCED WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING

Lesner Bridge Replacement. April 24, 2017 Update. Construction Camera. Rendering of the Completed Lesner Bridge Structure

EFFECTS OF SPATIAL VARIATION OF SEISMIC INPUTS ON BRIDGE LONGITUDINAL RESPONSE

ABC OF BRIDGE NO. 465 I-195 Ramp (Dr-2) Over Warren Avenue

Integral Bridge Design. Integral Bridge Design. in Midas Civil. Midas UK

Questions and Answers on VDOT's Supplement to the AASHTO Manual for Bridge Element Inspection

Development of Preflex Composite Beam-Stub Abutment Integral Bridge System

Design of Dingley Bypass Integral Bridges

Instrumentation and Monitoring of Precast Bridge Approach Tied to an Integral Abutment Bridge in Bremer County

Critically damaged bridges & concepts for earthquake recovery

Shifting the Canning Bus Bridge Sideways

Emergency Bridge Stabilization at Mile Watrous Subdivision

Field Monitoring and Evaluation of Curved Girder Bridges with Integral Abutments

EFFECT OF BACKFILL SOIL TYPE ON STIFFNESS AND CAPACITY OF BRIDGE ABUTMENTS

ATTACHMENT B8 Incident History

Keywords: integral abutment bridge, pile head abutment connection, finite element method.

Thermal Response of a Highly Skewed Integral Bridge

Prediction of Concrete Integral Abutment Bridge Unrecoverable Displacements

Flume Installation Instructions

THERMAL RESPO SE OF I TEGRAL ABUTME T BRIDGES WITH MSE WALLS: UMERICAL A ALYSES A D A PRACTICAL A ALYSIS TOOL

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 4 OVER THE CLEARWATER RIVER (DAM) DISTRICT 2 - CLEARWATER COUNTY

Assessing potential cracking zones in embankment dams

County of Orange. Presented to the Flood Division August 13, 2001 by Nadeem Majaj

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF SEAT- TYPE ABUTMENT HIGHWAY BRIDGES IN ILLINOIS

Long-Term Response Prediction of Skewed Integral Bridges under Creep Effects

Earthquake Design of Bridges With Integral Abutments

Experimental investigation of axial load on low cycle fatigue performance of steel H piles in integral bridges

Pennsylvania s Experience with LRFD Implementation. By: Thomas Macioce, P.E. Beverly Miller, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Title: Seismic Design Recommendations for Steel Girder Bridges with Integral Abutments

Experimental Evaluation of Seismic Pounding at Seat- Type Abutments of Horizontally Curved Bridges

SUMMARY OF NOVEMBER 2013 REVISIONS - VERSION

Transcription:

Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Integrated Bridge Systems (IBS) John Bowders University of Missouri

Adams et al. (2012), FHWA Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System Interim Implementation Guide

Motivations for GRS-IBS Simple construction procedure Potential cost savings Reduce project duration, especially with other ABC techniques Eliminate the bump at the end of the bridge

GRS-IBS vs. MSE Construction Materials Typical Reinforcement Spacing Analysis GRS-IBS MSE Freely draining aggregate, high strength reinforcement 8-in. Composite Material 2 to 3 ft Individual Tensile Forces Typical Foundation N/A (GRS) Piles Spacing difference results in significantly different behavior and performance!

Adams et al. (2012), FHWA Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System Interim Implementation Guide

Rustic Road: Before

Rustic Road Just west of Columbia Crosses fork of Grindstone Creek Prone to flash flooding 2-year return period for bridge deck At city limit County project with city participation Serves 10 residences Span length of 50 ft Height of about 14 ft Skew of 15 degrees

Limestone Foundation

Level First Row of Blocks

Vibratory Compaction of AASHTO #89 Stone (1/2 clean)

Placement of Reinforcement Sure would be a lot easier without these Mizzou guys

Repeat 14x = Completed Abutment

Precast tub girders

Prevent girders from floating away Plates 3 ft below bottom of girders

Deviating from General Procedure Clamped 2x4s to underlying reinforcement to prevent displacement of previous courses of block during compaction of current layer.

Monitor for 19 Months Performance Metric Monitored with Locations External 12 targets per abutment Land Surveying movement face Internal movement Earth pressure Pore pressure Settlement plates (vertical) Inclinometer (horizontal) Earth pressure cells Piezometers 3 plates in north abutment (top, middle, bottom) One casing per abutment Two cells at foundation 4 cells below girders 10 piezometers in north abutment

Survey Targets

3 plates in north abutment, installed in a vertical line in common casing 1 near bottom of abutment 1 near middle 1 near top Settlement Plates

Earth Pressure Cells 6 cells in north abutment: 2 in base layer 4 near top 1 beneath each girder

Vibrating Wire Piezometers 9 piezometers in north abutment: 3 near foundation, 4 in middle, 2 near top

Performance

Visual Observations: Cracks Cracks observed after construction but prior to bridge opening. Crack gages indicated less than 3 mm of movement during subsequent 19 months.

Visual Observations: Cracks

Survey: <0.5 in. Movement at Face

Inclinometers: <0.4 Horizontal Displacement

Earth Pressure Ground Temperature Cells

Piezometers

Piezometers: Response to one event

Conclusions: Rustic Road Performing as intended: Negligible external and internal displacements Backfill typically dry, drains quickly after precipitation events Cracks in facing blocks formed shortly after construction but did not expand

Conclusions: General From MU interviews with contractors, agency personnel across the country: No significant performance issues have been reported for any GRS-IBS FHWA Interim Implementation Manual helpful, generally accurate Finding construction rhythm important Leveling facing blocks also critical Congested sites not good candidates

Conclusions: General (cont d) Open-graded backfill with method spec easier than well-graded backfill with performance spec Agencies report cost of GRS-IBS decreases with experience Cost decrease hand-in-hand with construction learning curve Especially for contractors who build either MSE or bridges, but not both

Thanks to: Eric Lindsey, Burns & McDonnell Andy Boeckmann, Sam Runge & Erik Loehr, MU Civil Engineering Contact information: John Bowders bowdersj@missouri.edu 573-882-8351 https://library.modot.mo.gov/rdt/reports/tr201417/cmr16-019_reduced.pdf Instrumentation and Monitoring of Rustic Road Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Integrated Bridge System (IBS)