Sulfoniluree e glinidi: pro e contro

Similar documents
Hanyang University Guri Hospital Chang Beom Lee

Metabolic Karma. - Essential Solution in Type2 DM - Eun Gyoung Hong, M.D., Ph.D

Diabete: terapia nei pazienti a rischio cardiovascolare

Oral Hypoglycemics and Risk of Adverse Cardiac Events: A Summary of the Controversy

Glycemic control a matter of life and death

IDF Regions and global projections of the number of people with diabetes (20-79 years), 2013 and Diabetes Atlas -sixth Edition: IDF 2013

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

GLP 1 agonists Winning the Losing Battle. Dr Bernard SAMIA. KCS Congress: Impact through collaboration

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Metformin. Sulfonylurea. Thiazolidinedione. Insulin

LATE BREAKING STUDIES IN DM AND CAD. Will this change the guidelines?

CONTROLLO GLICEMICO E RISCHIO CARDIOVASCOLARE. AGOSTINO CONSOLI DMSI - Università d Annunzio CHIETI ITALY. sul Paziente ad alto rischio CV*

Gli endpoint micro-vascolari nei trial di outcome cardiovascolare

Initiating Insulin in Primary Care for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Dr Manish Khanolkar, Diabetologist, Auckland Diabetes Centre

Diabetes Guidelines in View of Recent Clinical Trials Are They Still Applicable?

Glucose Control and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

The Burden of the Diabetic Heart

What s New in Type 2? Peter Hammond Consultant Physician Harrogate District Hospital

Current Diabetes Care for Internists:2011

What s the Goal? Individualizing Glycemic Targets. Matthew Freeby M.D. December 3 rd, 2016

Diabetes Mellitus: Implications of New Clinical Trials and New Medications

Old oral antidiabetic agents in the armamentarium of diabetes mellitus treatment: Safety and efficacy

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Saxagliptin (BMS ) for type 2 diabetes. April 2008

Medical therapy advances London/Manchester RCP February/June 2016

Alia Gilani Health Inequalities Pharmacist

ADVANCE post trial ObservatioNal Study

Early treatment for patients with Type 2 Diabetes

What to add after metformin: primary care conference 2016

Cardiovascular Management of a Patient with Diabetes

Du gusts is megl che one. Edoardo Mannucci

Why is Earlier and More Aggressive Treatment of T2 Diabetes Better?

Non-insulin treatment in Type 1 DM Sang Yong Kim

Diabetes: Definition Pathophysiology Treatment Goals. By Scott Magee, MD, FACE

Ipoglicemia: trattamento e strategie di prevenzione

Supplementary Online Content

The Many Faces of T2DM in Long-term Care Facilities

Obesity, Insulin Resistance, Metabolic Syndrome, and the Natural History of Type 2 Diabetes

CADTH Optimal use report

No Increased Cardiovascular Risk for Lixisenatide in ELIXA

Type 2 Diabetes: Where Do We Start with Treatment? DIABETES EDUCATION. Diabetes Mellitus: Complications and Co-Morbid Conditions

Update on Pharmacological Management in Type 2 Diabetes

SIGN 154 Pharmacological management of glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. A national clinical guideline November 2017.

Management of Type 2 Diabetes

Management of Type 2 Diabetes Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Tom Blevins MD Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology Austin, Texas

Diabetic Management of the Cardiac Patient

Real World Evidence: From Efficacy to Effectiveness

dapagliflozin 5mg and 10mg film-coated tablets (Forxiga ) SMC No. (799/12) Bristol-Myers Squibb / AstraZeneca

효과적인경구혈당강하제의조합은? 대한당뇨병학회제 17 차연수강좌 ( ) 가천의대길병원내분비대사내과

Professor Rudy Bilous James Cook University Hospital

Abbreviations DPP-IV dipeptidyl peptidase IV DREAM Diabetes REduction Assessment with ramipril and rosiglitazone

The prevalence and morbidity associated with type 2. Review

IMPROVED DIAGNOSIS OF TYPE 2 DIABETES AND TAILORING MEDICATIONS

A nationwide population-based study. Pai-Feng Hsu M.D. Shao-Yuan Chuang PhD

T2 Diabetes in Sep-16. Stephen Leow Disclosures. Why do we treat diabetes? Agenda. Targets

Incretin-based Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes Comparisons Between Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors

Effective Health Care

Oral Agents. Ian Gallen Consultant Community Diabetologist Royal Berkshire Hospital Reading UK

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Soo LIM, MD, PHD Internal Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

Multiple Small Feedings of the Mind: Diabetes. Sonja K Fredrickson, MD, BC-ADM March 7, 2014

Gabriele Perriello Dipartimento di Medicina Interna Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Perugia. Metformina, sulfoniluree, pioglitazone

Modulating the Incretin System: A New Therapeutic Strategy for Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Overview of Combination Therapy with Sitagliptin and Metformin

CURRENT CONTROVERSIES IN DIABETES CARE

Drug Class Monograph

An Update on Guidelines and Evidence of the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Metformin should be considered in all patients with type 2 diabetes unless contra-indicated

Evidence-Based Glucose Management in Type 2 Diabetes

Treatment Options for Diabetes: An Update

Glucose and CV disease

Joslin Diabetes Center Advances in Diabetes and Thyroid Disease 2013 Noninsulin Treatment of Diabetes: What the PCP Needs to Know

Le incretine: un passo avanti. Francesco Dotta

Glyceamic control is indicated by 1. Fasting blood sugar less than 126 mg/dl 2. Random blood sugar 3. HbA1c less than 6.5 % Good glycaemic control

Current evidence on the effect of DPP-4 inhibitor drugs on mortality in type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients: A meta-analysis

Navigating the New Options for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes

GLP-1RA and insulin: friends or foes?

Empagliflozin (Jardiance ) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, the EMPA REG OUTCOME study

Hypoglycemic Therapy :What to start & stop

Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Evidence-Based Drivers

DPP-4 inhibitor. The new class drug for Diabetes

New Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: Second-Line Therapy Recommendations Report

Drug Class Monograph

Effective Health Care Program

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Diabetes Medications for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

Multi-factor approach to reduce cardiovascular risk in diabetes

Diabetes and the Heart

Management of Diabetes Mellitus: A Primary Care Perspective

CURRENT ISSUES IN DIABETES MANAGEMENT

T2DM is a global epidemic with

Sitagliptin: A component of incretin based therapy. Rezvan Salehidoost, M.D., Endocrinologist

Horizon Scanning Technology Summary. Liraglutide for type 2 diabetes. National Horizon Scanning Centre. April 2007

Current principles of diabetes management

Update on Insulin-based Agents for T2D. Harry Jiménez MD, FACE

Comprehensive Diabetes Treatment

Sitagliptin: first DPP-4 inhibitor to treat type 2 diabetes Steve Chaplin MSc, MRPharmS and Andrew Krentz MD, FRCP

Cardiovascular Benefits of Two Classes of Antihyperglycemic Medications

Diabetes new challenges, new agents, new order

This house believes that sulphonylureas should not be used routinely as second-line treatments for patients with type 2 diabetes

CADTH THERAPEUTIC REVIEW New Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: Second-Line Therapy Recommendations Report

Transcription:

Sulfoniluree e glinidi: pro e contro Giorgio Sesti Università Magna Graecia di Catanzaro ITALY

T2DM anti-hyperglycaemic therapy: general recommendations Diabetes Care 35:1364-1379, 2012; Diabetologia 55:1577-1596, 2012

1. Controllo Metabolico Sulfoniluree e glinidi: 2. Effetti sulla beta cellula 3. Durability 4. Effetti sul peso 5. Ipoglicemie 6. Complicanze micro-vascolari 7. Complicanze macro-vascolari

Weighted Mean Absolute Difference in Hemoglobin A1c Level between Groups for Randomized, Controlled Trials Comparing Oral Diabetes Medications with Placebo or Diet UKPDS 33 (10 years follow-up) Chlorpropamide vs. Conventional -1.2% UKPDS 33 (10 years follow-up) Glibenclamide vs. Conventional -0.7% Bolen S. et al. Ann Intern Med 147:386-399, 2007

Weighted Mean Absolute Difference in Hemoglobin A1c Level between Groups for Randomized, Controlled Trials Comparing Oral Diabetes Medications with Placebo or Diet 0-0,2-0,4-0,6-0,8-1 -1,2-1,4-1,6 Pioglitazone Metformin SU Repaglinide Acarbose -0,97-1,14-1,52-1,32-0,77 Bolen S. et al. Ann Intern Med 147:386-399, 2007

Weighted mean difference in HbA1c with use of oral medications for T2DM Bolen S. et al. Ann Intern Med 147:386-399, 2007

Effect of hypoglycemic agents as add-on therapy to metformin in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials -0.61-0.85-0.70-0.42 Monami M. et al Diabetes Res Clin Pract 79:196-203, 2008

Meta-analysis of RCTs with at least 3 months duration, evaluating antidiabetic drugs added to metformin Phung OJ et al. JAMA 303:1410-1418, 2010

Pooled between-group differences in HbA1c level with monotherapy and combination therapies. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials at least 24 weeks in duration Bennett W L et al. Ann Intern Med 154 602-613, 2011

Network meta-analysis of pairwise comparisons of randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of anti-hyperglycemic agents in addition to metformin vs. placebo: mean change from baseline in A1C Mean change from baseline in A1C level 0-0,2-0,4-0,6-0,8-1 -1,2 SU Glinides TZDs Acarbose DPP-4 GLP-1 Basal Biphasic inhibitors agonists insulin insulin -0,82-0,71-0,82-0,66-0,69-1,02-0,88-1,07 Liu S-C et al. Diabetes Obes and Metab 14: 810 820, 2012

Proportion of patients at HbA1c target <7% with eight classes of antidiabetic drugs in type 2 diabetes: systematic review of 218 randomized controlled trials with 78 945 patients Proportion of patients who achieved the HbA1c goal (%) 55 45 35 25 15 5-5 42 48,2 39,2 33,2 29,9 39 Met SU Glinides TZDs Acarbose DPP-4 GLP-1 Basal Biphasic Prandial Basal/ inhibitors agonists insulin insulin insulin Bolus 45,7 38,9 34,4 36,3 50,2 Esposito K. et al. Diabetes Obes and Metab 14: 228 233, 2012

Effect of antihyperglycemic agents added to metformin and a sulfonylurea on glycemic control in T2DM: a network meta-analysis 0-0,2-0,4-0,6-0,8-1 -1,2 GLP-1R agonists Insulin TZDs DPP-4 I Acarbose -1,01-1,08-0,95-0,94-0,70 Gross JL et al. Ann Intern Med 154:672-679, 2011

Mixed-treatment comparison showing the effect of adding second-line antihyperglycemic agents vs. placebo to metformin on change from baseline in HbA1c McIntosh B et al. Open Medicine 5:e35, 2011

Mixed-treatment comparison showing the effect of adding second-line antihyperglycemic agents vs. placebo to metformin on odds of at least 1 event of overall hypoglycemia McIntosh B et al. Open Medicine 5:e35, 2011

Mixed-treatment comparison showing the effect of adding second-line antihyperglycemic agents vs. placebo to metformin on change from baseline in body weight McIntosh B et al. Open Medicine 5:e35, 2011

Meta-analysis of RCTs with at least 3 months duration, evaluating antidiabetic drugs added to metformin Change in HbA1c Goal Achieved (<7.0%) Phung OJ et al. JAMA 303:1410-1418, 2010

1. Controllo Metabolico Sulfoniluree e glinidi: 2. Effetti sulla beta cellula 3. Durability 4. Effetti sul peso 5. Ipoglicemie 6. Complicanze micro-vascolari 7. Complicanze macro-vascolari

-cell function (%, HOMA) UKPDS: β-cell function progressively declines 100 80 60 40 20 0 Diabetes diagnosis Extrapolation of β-cell function prior to diagnosis Years from diagnosis Sulfonylureas(n = 511) Diet (n = 110) Metformin (n = 159) 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 UKPDS 16. Diabetes 44:1249 1258 1995. Lebovitz 7:139 153, 1999

ADOPT: β-cell Function According to Treatment Group Kahn et al. N Engl J Med 355:2427-2443, 2006

ADOPT: Baseline adjusted geometric mean levels in the full cohort within each treatment group over 4 years of follow-up for OGTT-derived dynamic measure of the early insulin response Rate of change from 0.5 to 4 years (% per year) Rosiglitazone: -6.0% Metformin: -7.4% Glyburide: -11.1%; P<0.0001 vs. Rosi Kahn SE et al. Diabetes 60:1552 1560, 2011

In vitro and ex vivo data

Insulin release (% of insulin content) in response to acute glucose stimulation from human islets exposed for 24-h to sulphonylureas (n = 10) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1,9 4,9 3,2 4,6 3,3 3,8 3.3 mmol/l glucose 16.7 mmol/l glucose Control Glimepiride (10 µm) Glibenclamide (10 µm) Chlorpropamide (10 µm) 3,4 3,6 Del Guerra S et al. J Diabetes Complications 19:60-4, 2005

Impaired insulin release (% of insulin content) in human islets pre-exposed for 24-h to sulphonylureas was reverted by an additional 48-h incubation in drug-free conditions 4,5 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 2 3,9 2,2 3,5 2,1 3.3 mmol/l glucose 16.7 mmol/l glucose 3,6 3,6 Control Glimepiride (10 µm) Glibenclamide (10 µm) Chlorpropamide (10 µm) 1,9 Del Guerra S et al. J Diabetes Complications 19:60-4, 2005

Chronic Antidiabetic Sulfonylureas In Vivo: Reversible Effects on Mouse Pancreatic beta-cells Remedi MS et al. PLoS Med 5: e206, 2008

Chronic Antidiabetic Sulfonylureas In Vivo: Reversible Effects on Mouse Pancreatic beta-cells Remedi MS et al. PLoS Med 5: e206, 2008

Absence of beta-cell apoptosis in islets from control or high dose (0.25 and 2.5 mg/pellet) glibenclamide-pelleted mice after 56 days Remedi, MS et al. PLoS Med 5: e206, 2008

ADOPT: β-cell Function According to Treatment Group washout Kahn et al. N Engl J Med 355:2427-2443, 2006

Effects of repaglinide, nateglinide, and glibenclamide on beta-cell apoptosis in human islets Control repaglinide nateglinide glibenclamide Maedler K et al.j Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 501 506, 2005

Gliclazide protects human islet beta-cells from apoptosis induced by intermittent high glucose Beta-cell apoptosis in human islets exposed for 5 days to 5.5 mmol/l glucose (NG), alternating 5.5 and 16.7 mmol/l glucose (HG), HG with gliclazide or HG with glibenclamide Del Guerra S et al. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 23: 234 238, 2007

Insulin release (% of insulin content) in response to acute glucose stimulation from human islets exposed for 5 days to 5.5 mmol/l glucose (NG), alternating 5.5 and 16.7 mmol/l glucose (HG), HG with gliclazide or HG with glibenclamide 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 3,1 1,8 Low glucose (control) High glucose High glucose + Gliclazide (10 µm) 2,2 P<0.05 1,5 High glucose + Glibenclamide (1 µm) Del Guerra S et al. Diabetes Metab 35:293-298, 2009

Viability of MIN6 beta cell exposed to H 2 O 2 in the presence of gliclazide (5 µmol/l) or glibenclamide (5 µmol/l) Kimoto K et al. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 303:112-9, 2003

Exposure to gliclazide, but not glibenclamide, significantly induced expression of PDX-1, a fundamental beta-cell differentiation transcription factor, and Ki67, a marker of proliferation in human islets Del Guerra S et al. Diabetes Metab 35:293-298, 2009

1. Controllo Metabolico Sulfoniluree e glinidi: 2. Effetti sulla beta cellula 3. Durability 4. Effetti sul peso 5. Ipoglicemie 6. Complicanze micro-vascolari 7. Complicanze macro-vascolari

Summary of studies examining the effect of sulfonylurea (SU) treatment vs. placebo or vs. active-comparator on A1C in type 2 diabetic subjects Change in HbA1c (%) 1 0-1 -2 x x Glimpepiride Glyburide GLY SU x x Gliclazide Gliclazide Glyburide Alvarsson (n=39) Alvarsson (n=48) RECORD (n=301) Hanefeld (n=250) Charbonnel (n=317) ADOPT (n=1,456) Periscope (n=178) Tan (n=249) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 TIME (years) x SU Glyburide x Glyburide UKPDS (n=1,573) Chicago (n=232) DeFronzo R A Diabetes 58:773-795, 2009

HbA1c (%) UKPDS 33: Over time, glycaemic control deteriorates 9 8 7 6 0 cohort, median data Conventional (n=896) Glibenclamide (n=615) Insulin (n=911) Chlorpropamide (n=619) ADA goal 0 2 4 6 8 10 Years from randomisation Lancet 352:837-853, 1998

UKPDS 49: Proportion of patients who attain HbA1c < 7.0% % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 25 47 53 53 47 Conventional Insulin Chlorpropamide Glibenclamide 12 37 3 years 6 years 9 years 39 29 9 28 28 20 Turner RC et al. JAMA 281: 2005-2012, 1999

HbA 1c (%) UKPDS 34: Over time, glycaemic control deteriorates in overweight T2DM 9 8 7 6 0 cohort, median values 0 2 4 6 8 10 Years from randomisation Conventional (n=411) Glibenclamide (n=277) Metformin (n=342) Insulin (n=409) Chlorpropamide (n=265) ADA goal UKPDS 34. Lancet 352:854 865, 1998

UKPDS 49: Proportion of patients who attain HbA1c < 7.0% % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 23 34 53 51 40 44 12 37 33 23 34 11 Diet Insulin Chlorpropamide Glibenclamide Metformin 3 years 6 years 9 years 24 20 22 13 Turner RC et al. JAMA 281: 2005-2012, 1999

ADOPT: Treatments and HbA1c Kahn et al. N Engl J Med 355:2427-2443, 2006

HbA 1c (%) 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 0 ADOPT: Treatments and HbA1c Rosiglitazone vs. Metformin 0.13, P=0.002 Rosiglitazone vs. Glibenclamide 0.42, P<0.001 0 1 2 3 4 5 ADA goal Rosiglitazone (n=1456) Metformin (n=1454) Glibenclamide (n=1441) Time (years) Kahn et al. N Engl J Med 355:2427-2443, 2006

Time course of HbA1C in ADOPT redrawn to show average blood glucose control over the first 3 years Al-Ozairi E et al. Diabetes Care 30: 1677-1680, 2007

Time course of HbA1C in ADOPT redrawn to show average blood glucose control over the first 3 years Al-Ozairi E et al. Diabetes Care 30: 1677-1680, 2007

Treatment effects on A1C by SU class, dose, and time: a meta-analysis Glipizide Glimepiride Glibenclamide Sherifali D et al. Diabetes Care 33:1859 1864, 2010

Gliclazide MR Other Sulfonylureas Metformin Thiazolidinediones Glinides Insulin ADVANCE: Glucose control drugs at end of follow-up Acarbose Randomized treatment Intensive (n=4828) 90.5% 1.9% 73.8% 16.9% 19.1% 1.2% 40.5% Standard (n=4741) 1.6% 57.1% 67.0% 10.9% 12.9% 2.8% 24.1% N Engl J Med 358:2560-2572, 2008

Mean HbA1c (%) 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 Hemoglobin A 1c : ADVANCE Standard Intensive (Gliclazide MR) Δ 0.67% (95% CI 0.64 0.70); P<0.0001 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 Follow-up (Months) Mean HbA 1c at final visit 7.3 % 6.5% ADVANCE collaborative group. N Engl J Med 358:2560-72, 2008

Drug Use at Study End Insulin Glargine Standard Care P No Oral Agents (%) 35 19 <0.001 1 Oral Agents (%) 51 39 <0.001 2 Oral Agents (%) 12 28 <0.001 > 3 Oral Agents (%) 3 14 <0.001 Rapid insulin (%) 2 5 <0.001 Any Insulin (%) 80 11 <0.001 Metformin (%) 47 60 <0.001 Sulfonylurea (%) 25 47 <0.001 ORIGIN Trial Investigators, N Engl J Med 367: 319-28, 2012

A1C (%) 7,0 6,0 5,0 Median A1C Levels ORIGIN trial 6,4 6,4 Median follow-up = 6.2 years 6,2 5,9 6,3 6 6 6,4 6,4 6,1 6,5 6,5 6,5 6,2 6,3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year 6,2 Glargine Standard ORIGIN Trial Investigators, N Engl J Med 367: 319-28, 2012

Kaplan- Meier curve of the period until the start of insulin treatment from gliclazide or glibenclamide treatment: retrospective analysis in Japanese patients Glibenclamide Gliclazide Satoh J et al. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract 70: 291 297, 2005

Sitagliptin vs. Glipizide as add-on to Metformin: Sustained reduction in HbA1c over 2 year (n=256) (n=248) The rise in HbA1c from week 24 to the end of the 2nd year was less with sitagliptin treatment compared with glipizide [coefficient of durability (95%CI): 0.16% year (0.10, 0.21) vs. 0.26% year (0.21,0.31) respectively; between-group difference in COD (95% CI) = -0.10% year (-0.16, -0.05)] Glipizide 0.51% Sitagliptin 0.54% Seck T et al. Int J Clin Pract 64:562-76, 2010

Serum C-peptide profiles during the nine-point meal tolerance test at baseline and following a 4- to 7-day wash off of study drug following 2 years of treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide added to metformin therapy Seck T et al. Int J Clin Pract 64:562-76, 2010

Baseline and study endpoint results for indices of beta-cell function from the 9-point meal tolerance tests administered following a 4- to 7-day wash off of study drug after 2 years of treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide added to metformin therapy Seck T et al. Int J Clin Pract 64:562-76, 2010

Time course of mean HbA1c during 117 weeks of treatment, with vildagliptin plus metformin or glimepiride (up to 6 mg/day) plus metformin in patients aged <65 years Sustainability of treatment effect: the mean time that patients treated with vildagliptin or glimepiride maintained their initial response (no increase of >0.3% above the nadir during the first 6 months) was 292 vs. 258 days, respectively (P<0.001) 0.1% 0.1% Matthews DR et al. Diabetes Obes Metab12: 780 789, 2010.

Change in HbA1c over time Göke B, et al. Int J Clin Pract 67:307-16, 2013

Kaplan Meier analysis of time to discontinuation owing to insufficient glycemic control Göke B, et al. Int J Clin Pract 67:307-16, 2013

1. Controllo Metabolico Sulfoniluree e glinidi: 2. Effetti sulla beta cellula 3. Durability 4. Effetti sul peso 5. Ipoglicemie 6. Complicanze micro-vascolari 7. Complicanze macro-vascolari

Glitazone-like action of glimepiride and glibenclamide in primary human adipocytes Mayer P. et al. Diabetes Obes and Metab 13: 791 799, 2011

Weight (kg) 10.0 7.5 2.5 0.0-2.5 UKPDS 33: Treatments and weight change cohort, mean data Chlorpropamide 5.0 Glibenclamide 0 2 4 6 8 10 Years from randomisation Insulin Conventional UKPDS 33 Lancet 352:837-853, 1998

UKPDS 34: Treatments and weight change in overweight T2DM Weight change (kg) cohort, mean values 10 Insulin 5 Chlorpropamide Metformin 0-5 Baseline = 85 kg Conventional 0 2 4 6 8 10 Years from randomisation Glibenclamide UKPDS 34. Lancet 352:854-865, 1998

ADOPT: Treatments and weight change Kahn et al. N Engl J Med 355:2427-2443, 2006

Weighted Mean Absolute Difference in Body Weight between Groups for Randomized, Controlled Trials Comparing Oral Diabetes Medications with Placebo or Diet Bolen S. et al. Ann Intern Med 147:386-399, 2007

Weighted Mean Absolute Difference in Body Weight between Groups for Randomized, Controlled Trials Comparing Oral Diabetes Medications with Placebo or Diet 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0-0,5 3 3,1 0,3 Pioglitazone Rosiglitazone Metformin SU Acarbose 3,8-0,1 Bolen S. et al. Ann Intern Med 147:386-399, 2007

Meta-analysis of RCTs with at least 3 months duration, evaluating antidiabetic drugs added to metformin Change in Body Weight Phung OJ et al. JAMA 303:1410-1418, 2010

Network meta-analysis of pairwise comparisons of randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of anti-hyperglycemic agents in addition to metformin vs. placebo: Mean change from baseline in body weight Mean change from baseline in body weight 4 3 2 1 0-1 -2 SU Glinides TZDs Acarbose DPP-4 GLP-1 Basal Biphasic inhibitors agonists insulin insulin 2,17 1,4 2,46-1,01 0,23-1,66 1,38 3,41 Liu S-C et al. Diabetes Obes and Metab 14: 810 820, 2012

Pooled between-group difference in body weight with monotherapy and combination therapies. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials at least 24 weeks in duration Bennett W L et al. Ann Intern Med 154 602-613, 2011

Gliclazide MR Other Sulfonylureas Metformin Thiazolidinediones Glinides Insulin ADVANCE: Glucose control drugs at end of follow-up Acarbose Randomized treatment Intensive (n=4828) 90.5% 1.9% 73.8% 16.9% 19.1% 1.2% 40.5% Standard (n=4741) 1.6% 57.1% 67.0% 10.9% 12.9% 2.8% 24.1% N Engl J Med 358:2560-2572, 2008

ADVANCE: Difference in body weight at end of follow-up Weight (kg) 80 79 78 77 76 75 Difference 0.75 kg (0.56, 0.94) P<0.0001 Standard Intensive 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 Follow-up (months) N Engl J Med 358:2560-2572, 2008

1. Controllo Metabolico Sulfoniluree e glinidi: 2. Effetti sulla beta cellula 3. Durability 4. Effetti sul peso 5. Ipoglicemie 6. Complicanze micro-vascolari 7. Complicanze macro-vascolari

Rate of severe hypoglycemic events (event per 100 patients per year) 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 0,7 Rate of severe hypoglycemic events 0,6 2,5 0,1 0,1 0,4 Conventional Chlorpropamide Glibenclamide Metformin Standard Therapy Intensive Therapy Rosiglitazone 0,7 0,6 0,6 UKPDS 34 UKPDS 33 ADVANCE ADOPT 0,4 0,1 0,1

UKPDS: prevalence of hypoglycaemia in Type 2 diabetes Patients (%) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Annual percentage of patients reporting 1 hypoglycaemic event* 0,1% 1,2% 0,3% 3,8% Diet Sulfonylurea Metformin Basal insulin 5,5% Basal + prandial insulin *Hypoglycaemia: temporary incapacity or requiring medical help Wright AD et al. J Diabetes Complications.20:395-401, 2006

Network meta-analysis of pairwise comparisons of randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of anti-hyperglycemic agents in addition to metformin vs. placebo: At least one event of overall hypoglycaemia (odds ratio) At least one event of overall hypoglycaemia (odds ratio) 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 8,86 10,51 0,45 0,4 1,13 0,92 SU Glinides TZDs Acarbose DPP-4 GLP-1 Basal Biphasic inhibitors agonists insulin insulin 4,77 17,78 Liu S-C et al. Diabetes Obes and Metab 14: 810 820, 2012

Pooled odds of mild or moderate hypoglycemia with monotherapy and combination therapies. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials at least 24 weeks in duration Bennett W L et al. Ann Intern Med 154 602-613, 2011

Pooled hypoglycemia results for randomized trials, by drug comparison Bolen S. et al. Ann Intern Med 147:386-399, 2007

Meta-analysis of RCTs with at least 3 months duration, evaluating antidiabetic drugs added to metformin Change in Overall Hypoglycemia Phung OJ et al. JAMA 303:1410-1418, 2010

1. Controllo Metabolico Sulfoniluree e glinidi: 2. Effetti sulla beta cellula 3. Durability 4. Effetti sul peso 5. Ipoglicemie 6. Complicanze micro-vascolari 7. Complicanze macro-vascolari

UKPDS 33: Microvascular events (Retinopathy and nephropathy) Chlorpropamide (n=619) Glibenclamide (n=615) Insulin (n= 911) favours favours RR 0.1 intensive 1 conventional 10 0.86 (0.63-1.17) 0.66 (0.47-0.93) 0.70 (0.52-0.93) P = 0.33 P = 0.017 P = 0.015 UKPDS 33 Lancet 352:837-853, 1998

UKPDS 33: Microvascular events (Retinopathy and nephropathy) Chlorpropamide (n=619) Glibenclamide (n=615) P = 0.33 P = 0.017 favours favours RR 0.1 intensive 1 conventional 10 0.86 (0.63-1.17) P=0.33 0.66 (0.47-0.93) P=0.017 UKPDS 33 Lancet 352:837-853, 1998

UKPDS 80: Extended effects of improved glycemic control in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes- Microvascular Disease Hazard Ratio (Photocoagulation, vitreous haemorrhage, renal failure) Intensive (SU/Ins) vs. Conventional glucose control HR (95%CI) Holman R.R. et al. N Engl J Med 359:1577-1589, 2008

ADANCE: Major microvascular events Number of patients with event Intensive Standard (n=5,571) (n=5,569) Favors Intensive Favors Standard Relative risk reduction (95% CI) Microvascular 526 605 14% (3 to 23) New or worsening retinopathy 332 349 5% (-10 to 18) New or worsening nephropathy 230 292 21% (7 to 34) 0.5 1.0 2.0 Hazard ratio P=0.01 P=0.006 N Engl J Med 358:2560-2572, 2008

1. Controllo Metabolico Sulfoniluree e glinidi: 2. Effetti sulla beta cellula 3. Durability 4. Effetti sul peso 5. Ipoglicemie 6. Complicanze micro-vascolari 7. Complicanze macro-vascolari a. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) b. Registry studies c. Meta-analisi

Proportion of patients with event 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 UKPDS 33: Myocardial Infarction Conventional (n=896) Chlorpropamide (619) Glibenclamide (615) Insulin (911) Glibenclamide vs. conventional Relative Risk 0.78 (0.60-1.01) P = 0.056 0 3 6 9 12 15 Years from randomisation Intensive vs. conventional Relative Risk 0.84 (0.71-1.00) P = 0.052 UKPDS 33 Lancet 352:837-853, 1998

Myocardial Infarction Hazard Ratio (Fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction or sudden death) Intensive (SU/Ins) vs. Conventional glucose control HR (95%CI) Holman R.R. et al. N Engl J Med 359:1577-1589, 2008

All-cause Mortality Hazard Ratio Intensive (SU/Ins) vs. Conventional glucose control HR (95%CI) Holman R.R. et al. N Engl J Med 359:1577-1589, 2008

Major macrovascular events defined as death from CV causes, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke: ADVANCE 25 20 15 10 5 0 Standard Intensive Follow-up (months) Relative risk reduction 6% (95% CI: -6 to 16%) P=0.32 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 N Engl J Med 358:2560-2572, 2008

ADOPT: CV Adverse Events According to Treatment Group Kahn et al. N Engl J Med 355:2427-2443, 2006

Prognostic implications of glucose-lowering treatment in patients with acute MI and T2DM : extended follow-up (median 4.1yrs) of the DIGAMI 2 Study Mellbin LG et al. Diabetologia 54:1308 1317, 2011

Odds ratio for major CV events with SU: a meta analysis of RCTs Monami M et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 15:938 953, 2013

Odds ratio for all cause mortality with SU: a meta analysis of RCTs Monami M et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 15:938 953, 2013

1. Controllo Metabolico Sulfoniluree e glinidi: 2. Effetti sulla beta cellula 3. Durability 4. Effetti sul peso 5. Ipoglicemie 6. Complicanze micro-vascolari 7. Complicanze macro-vascolari a. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) b. Registry studies c. Meta-analisi

Impact of Preadmission Sulfonylureas on Mortality and CV Outcomes in Diabetic Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: The French registry on Acute ST-elevation and non ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) Patients on SU had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality, compared with patients without sulfonylurea therapy before admission OR= 0.50 (95% CI 0.27 0.94), P=0.03 Zeller M et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: 4993 5002, 2010

Overall mortality in 23915 patients with type 2 diabetes initiators of monotherapy with metformin (12774), glipizide (4325), glyburide (4279) or glimepiride (2537) Glyburide vs. Metformin HR: 1.59 (95%CI 1.35-1.88) Glipizide vs. Metformin HR: 1.64 (95%CI 1.39-1.94) Glimepiride vs. Metformin HR: 1.68 (95%CI 1.37-2.06) Metformin Pantaleone K M et al. Diabetes Obes and Metab 14: 803 809, 2012

Risk of acute coronary events associated with glyburide compared with gliclazide use in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nested case control study Adjusted odds ratio for baseline drug use and co-morbidities; past exposure, a dispensation for glyburide or gliclazide more than 120 days of the event date; recent exposure: a dispensation for glyburide or gliclazide within 120 days of the event date. Abdelmoneim As et al. Diabetes Obes and Metab 2013

Risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) using multivariable Cox models in a retrospective cohort of 20,450 T2DM patients from an electronic health record (EHR) derived clinical data repository at the Cleveland Clinic for the period 10/24/1998 to 10/12/2006 Pantalone KM et al. Acta Diabetologica 46:145 154, 2009

First-time hospitalization for MI identified from the Hospital Discharge Registry and the Civil Registration System of North Jutland County, Denmark Johnsen SP et al Am J Ther 13:134 140, 2006

The general practice research database in the United Kingdom comprises clinical and prescribing data from anonymised patient based clinical records of about five million people. Outcome: risk of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and all cause mortality associated with prescription of different classes of oral anti-diabetes drugs among men and women with diabetes. Mean follow-up was 7.1 years. Tzoulaki, J et al. BMJ 339:b4731, 2009

Risk of a first episode of myocardial infarction among patients receiving rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, sulphonylureas, and other drugs and combinations compared with patients receiving metformin alone Model 1: adjusted for sex and duration of diabetes, stratified by year and quartiles of age at treatment. Tzoulaki, J et al. BMJ 339:b4731, 2009

Risk for all cause mortality among patients receiving rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, sulphonylureas, and other drugs and combinations compared with patients receiving metformin alone Model 1: adjusted for sex and duration of diabetes, stratified by year and quartiles of age at treatment. Tzoulaki, J et al. BMJ 339:b4731, 2009

Retrospective cohort study from National Veterans Health Administration databases linked to Medicare files. Roumie CL et al. Ann Intern Med157:601-610, 2012

Adjusted hazard ratios for the primary composite outcome (CVD or death) and secondary outcome (CVD alone), stratified by CVD history, age, and BMI Adjusted HR 1.21 [95% CI, 1.13 to 1.30] Adjusted HR, 1.16 [CI, 1.06 to 1.25] Roumie CL et al. Ann Intern Med157:601-610, 2012

1. Controllo Metabolico Sulfoniluree e glinidi: 2. Effetti sulla beta cellula 3. Durability 4. Effetti sul peso 5. Ipoglicemie 6. Complicanze micro-vascolari 7. Complicanze macro-vascolari a. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) b. Registry studies c. Meta-analisi

Comparative effects of any Sulfonylurea vs. any comparator on cardiovascular morbidity: meta-analysis of five RCT (n=2.795) Selvin E et a. Arch Intern Med 168:2070-2080, 2008

RR estimates for CVD mortality associated with combination therapy of metformin and sulfonylurea: a meta-analysis of observational studies Rao AD et al. Diabetes Care 31:1672 1678, 2008

RR estimates for a composite end point of CVD hospitalizations (the first CV event fatal or nonfatal), or mortality associated with combination therapy of metformin and sulfonylurea: a meta-analysis of observational studies Rao AD et al. Diabetes Care 31:1672 1678, 2008

Flow-chart per la terapia del diabete mellito di tipo 2