Relapsed/Refractory PTCL

Similar documents
Unmet need for new strategies in T cell lymphoma

Today, how many PTCL patients are cured? Steven M. Horwitz M.D. Associate Attending Lymphoma Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Changing the landscape of treatment in Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma

What from the basket of BTK and PI3K inhibitors?

Updates in T cell Lymphoma

Controversies and Approaches to T cell Lymphoma Therapy in 2016

What is the best approach to the initial therapy of PTCL? standards of treatment? Should all

BCL-2 Inhibitors in Follicular Lymphoma

Development of Mogamulizumab, a defucosylated anti-ccr4 humanized monoclonal antibody

Clinical Updates and Issues: T-Cell Lymphomas

Romidepsin and. Michelle Fanale, MD Associate Professor Department of Lymphoma/ Myeloma UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX

Does BV as part of salvage impact outcome?

T-cell Lymphomas: Diagnosis and New Agents. Mary Jo Lechowicz Thursday, July 27 Debates and Didactics in Hematology and Oncology

Disclosures of XXXXX

Phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinase inhibitors in the treatment of T-cell lymphomas

Phase 1 Study of ARRY-520 and Carfilzomib in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Brentuximab Vedotin in Lymphomas

Bendamustine for Hodgkin lymphoma. Alison Moskowitz, MD Assistant Attending Memorial Sloan Kettering, Lymphoma Service

Phase I Study of Carfilzomib and Panobinostat for Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: A Multicenter MMRC Clinical Trial

MSN, ANP-BC, AOCNP1*, R.

Duvelisib (IPI-145), a PI3K-δ,γ Inhibitor, is Clinically Active in Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

SYMPOSIUM ON LYMPHOMA

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

HÔPITAL SAINT LOUIS, PARIS, FRANCE 2 STANFORD CANCER INSTITUTE - PALO ALTO, CA, USA 3 S. KIMMEL CANCER CENTER, JEFFERSON, PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA 4

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin and non-hodgkin Lymphoma: How do they work? Where will we use them? Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic

T-cell Lymphomas Biology and Management

Prognostic Factors for PTCL. Julie M. Vose, M.D., M.B.A. University of Nebraska Medical Center

Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Indolent and Mantle-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 2. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; 3

Barbara Pro Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States,

A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car- Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: nobody knows what to do...

Building a Fully Integrated Biopharmaceutical Company. June 2014

Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of IPI-145, a Potent Inhibitor of Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase-δ,γ in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Phase 1 Trial Evaluating MRG-106, a Synthetic Inhibitor of microrna- 155, in Patients with CTCL

PET-CT in Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma: To Be or Not To Be

BR is an established treatment regimen for CLL in the front-line and R/R settings

CUTANEOUS T-CELL LYMPHOMA: SYSTEMIC THERAPY. Anne W. Beaven, MD Associate Professor Director, Lymphoma Program University of North Carolina

Phase 1 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of MRG-106, a Synthetic Inhibitor of microrna-155, in CTCL Patients

Carfilzomib for PTCL. Julie M. Vose, M.D., M.B.A. University of Nebraska Medical Center

Is there a Role for Upfront Stem Cell Transplantation in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: YES!

NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA TREATMENT REGIMENS: Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (Part 1 of 5)

DFCR. Dept. of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 2. Dept. of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, USA

What is the best second-line approach to induce remission prior to stem cell transplant? Single agent brentuximab vedotin

Chemotherapy-based approaches are the optimal second-line therapy prior to stem cell transplant in relapsed HL

Challenges in Distinguishing Clinical Signals to Support Development Decisions: Case Studies

Tolerability and activity of chemo-free triplet combination of umbralisib (TGR-1202), ublituximab, and ibrutinib in patients with advanced CLL and NHL

2018 KSMO Immune Oncology Forum. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in hematologic. malignancies: evidences and perspectives 서울아산병원종양내과 홍정용

Phase 1 study of AG-881, an inhibitor of mutant IDH1/IDH2, in patients with advanced IDH mutant solid tumors, including glioma

Presented at the 60th Annual ASH Meeting and Exposition December 1 4, 2018 San Diego, CA

Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Is Cell of Origin Necessary for Treatment Selection?

Should peripheral T-cell lymphoma be treated by autologous or allogeneic SCT?

Forum 115 Management Issues in Cutaneous Lymphomas. Management of Transformed Mycosis Fungoides

POST ICML Indolent lymphomas relapse treatment

Clinical Update. Educational Objectives After completing this activity, the participant should be better able to:

Treatment Approaches in Relapsed/Refractory HL. Brentuximab Vedo=n. Anas Younes, M.D. Chief, Lymphoma Service Memorial Sloan-Ke=ering Cancer Center

Mantle Cell Lymphoma New scenario and concepts in front-line treatment for young pa:ents

Disclosures. Membership of Advisory Committees: Research Support/ PI: Celgene Corporation Millennium Pharmaceuticals Johnson & Johnson

ICONIC: Biologic and clinical activity of first in class ICOS agonist antibody JTX /- nivolumab (nivo) in patients with advanced cancers

Supportive Care in the Management of T-cell Lymphomas

Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma. Pro auto. Peter Reimer. Klinik für Hämatologie / intern. Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation

DYNAMO: A PHASE 2 STUDY OF DUVELISIB IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY INDOLENT NON HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car- Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 1 Trial of Lenalidomide (REVLIMID ) With Bortezomib (VELCADE ) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

NASDAQ: TGTX. 33 rd Annual JP Morgan Healthcare Conference

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma. Catherine Hildyard Haematology Senior Registrar Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Phase 1 study of AG-881, an inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2: results from the recurrent/progressive glioma population

Expert Perspective on ASH 2014: Lymphoma

How to Integrate the New Drugs into the Management of Multiple Myeloma

University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; 8 Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 9

Interesting case in lymphoma. Kitsada Wudhikarn, MD Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

Disclosures. Consultancy, Research Funding and Speakers Bureau: Celgene Corporation, Millennium, Onyx, Cephalon

Characterization of Patients with Poor-

SH/EAHP Workshop 2011 Los Angeles, California, USA

Kamakshi V Rao, PharmD, BCOP, FASHP University of North Carolina Medical Center UPDATE IN REFRACTORY HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

The outcome of peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients failing first line therapy: a report from the prospective, international T-Cell project

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Matt Ahearne Clinical Lecturer, Leicester

Proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) refractory multiple myeloma is associated with inferior patient outcomes

Disclosure Slide. Research Support: Onconova Therapeutics, Celgene

Fifteenth International Kidney Cancer Symposium November 4-5, 2016 Marriott Miami Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida, USA

Mogamulizumab: a defucosylated anti-ccr4 humanized monoclonal antibody in PTCL

Pembrolizumab in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Phase 2 KEYNOTE-087 Study

Use of Single-Arm Cohorts/Trials to Demonstrate Clinical Benefit for Breakthrough Therapies. Eric H. Rubin, MD Merck Research Laboratories

Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Immunoconjugates in Both the Adjuvant and Metastatic Setting

Poteligeo (mogamulizmuab-kpkc)

Treatment Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Treatment outcomes of IMEP as a front-line chemotherapy for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas

Linfoma de Hodgkin. Novos medicamentos. Otavio Baiocchi CRM-SP

Bendamustine is Effective Therapy in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Brentuximab Vedotin. Anas Younes, M.D. Chief, Lymphoma Service Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Strategies for the Treatment of Elderly DLBCL Patients, New Combination Therapy in NHL, and Maintenance Rituximab Therapy in FL

Presented at the 59th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition; December 9 12, 2017; Atlanta, GA, USA

Welcome and Introductions

City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA; 11 Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 1

Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Combination Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Nivolumab in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) Specified and Unspecified. Eric Van Den Neste Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles

CME Information. histone deacetylase inhibition in patients with peripheral T-cell or NK/ T-cell lymphoma.

Transcription:

The Combination of Duvelisib, a PI3Kδ,γ Inhibitor, and Romidepsin Is Highly Active in Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma with Low Rates of Transaminitis: Results of Parallel Multicenter, Phase 1 Combination Studies with Expansion Cohorts Steven M. Horwitz MD, Alison J. Moskowitz MD, Eric D Jacobsen MD, Neha MehtaShah MD, Michael S Khodadoust MD, PhD, David C. Fisher MD PhD, Patricia Myskowski MD, Erica B.K. Wang MD, Marianne Tawa RN MSN ANP, Theresa Davey MMSc PAC, William Blouin MBA, Helen Hancock NP, Nivetha Ganesan MPH, Natasha Galasso BA, Evan Marzouk BA, Alexandra Bahgat BS, Hallie Jester BA, Sophia Fong BS, Abeer Butt BS, Ahmet Dogan MD PhD, Youn H. Kim MD and David M Weinstock MD

Relapsed/Refractory PTCL Outcomes ORR Median PFS Pralatrexate N=109 Romidepsin N=131 Belinostat N=129 Brentuximab (PTCL) N=34 Brentuximab (ALCL) N=56 29% 11% 3.5 mos 25% 15% 4 mos 26% 11% 1.6 mos 41% 24% 6.7 mos 86% 59% 14.6 mos O Connor OA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1182-1189 Coiffier B, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30 :631-636 O Connor OA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33:2492-2499. Horwitz et al. Blood 2014 123:3095-3100 Pro B, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2190-2196 Progression Free Survival post Allogeneic SCT SD/PD Median PFS (months) PR/SD PD 61.3 11.4 6.4 PR Mehta-Shah et al. ASH 2017

Duvelisib, PI3K-δγ Inhibitor, in T-cell Lymphoms ORR in PTCL (N=16) : 50% 3 (19%) Median PFS 8.3 months ORR in CTCL (N=19): 32% 0 Median PFS 4.5 months Most patients treated at 75 mg BID Horwitz et al. Blood. 2018 Feb 22;131(8):888-898

Rationale Adding active agents to try to increase efficacy: ORR, (bridge to transplant), durability of response Preclinical data suggests an epigenetic mechanism could mitigate the effects of PI3K inhibition in resistant lines. Cell line data demonstrates that PI3K-inhibitors may have a synergistic effect in inducing apoptosis when combined with HDAC inhibitors. Genomic data (largely in CTCL) supported combining PI3K and NF-κB inhibition. Horwitz et al. Blood. 2018 Feb 22;131(8):888-898 Ungewickell et al., Nature Genetics 47, 1056 1060 (2015)

Study Objectives Primary Endpoint: To define the MTD of the combinations of duvelisib + romidepsin, and duvelisib + bortezomib Secondary Objectives: To characterize the safety and toxicity To assess the ORR,, TTR,DOR, PFS To collect tissue for exploratory and translational biologic studies Exploratory Endpoints: Correlation of response with prior therapy Tissue collection for investigating predictors of response or resistance to therapy

SCOR IIT: A Phase I Trial of Duvelisib (IPI-145) in Combination with Either Romidepsin or Bortezomib in Relapsed/Refractory T-cell Lymphoma Participating Institutions Memorial Sloan Kettering Dana Farber Cancer Institute Stanford University Washington University in St. Louis Funding from Verastem Support from the LLS Parallel Phase I: 3+3 Design with Dose Expansion at MTD

Patient Characteristics Characteristics n = 80 Median age (range) 64 (28-83) Male, n (%) 46 (57%) Prior # therapies, median (range) 3 (1-16) Prior Transplants, n (%) 13 (16%) Autologous 11 (14%) Allogenic 2 (3%) Race White 63 African-American or Black 10 Asian 3 Not Reported 4 Diagnosis n = 80 Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma 51 Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma 29

Phase 1 Dose Escalation MTD Arm A: Dose Level 3 Romidepsin (10mg/m2 IV) Duvelisib (75mg PO, BID) ARM A Duvelisib + Romidepsin MTD Arm B: Dose Level 1 Bortezomib (1.0mg/m2 SQ) Duvelisib (25mg PO, BID) ARM B Duvelisib + Bortezomib Dose Level #pts treated #pts evaluable for MTD #pts with DLT Dose Level #pts treated #pts evaluable for MTD #pts with DLT DL1 Romidepsin (10mg/m2 IV) + Duvelisib (25mg PO, BID) 4 3 0 DL1 Bortezomib (1.0mg/m2 SQ) + Duvelisib (25mg PO, BID) 6 8 1* DL2 Romidepsin (10mg/m2 IV) + Duvelisib (50mg PO, BID) 3 3 0 DL2 Bortezomib (1.0mg/m2 SQ) + Duvelisib (50mg PO, BID) 3 3 0 (3**) DL 3 Romidepsin (10mg/m2 IV) + Duvelisib (75mg PO, BID) 4 3 0 DL3 Bortezomib (1.0mg/m2 SQ) + Duvelisib (75mg PO, BID) 5 6 0 (3**) *DLT: Grade 3 Neutropenia **experienced LFT toxicities after DLT reporting period

Response: Duvelisib and Romidepsin (Arm A) by Histology All Dose Levels Histology Patients ORR Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma 27 16 (59%) 9 (33%) AITL/ TFH 8 6 (75%) 5 (63%) PTCL, NOS 11 7 (64%) 4 (36%) Hepatosplenic TCL 2 1 (50%) 0 Aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ TCL 2 1 (50%) 0 Primary cutaneous PTCL 1 1 (100%) 0 Primary cutaneous Gamma-delta (γδ) 2 0% 0 T-PLL 1 0% 0 Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma 11 5 (45%) 0 Sezary Syndrome 4 2 (50%) 0 Mycosis Fungoides 7 3 (43%) 0 Large Cell Transformation* 4 1 (25%) 0 Overall 38 21 (55%) 9 (24%)

Arm A Progression-Free Survival, all dose levels Progression Free Survival Probability (%) + Censored Transplant CTCL n=11; censored=4 Median PFS: 5.41 Mos CI: 2.30-10.66 PTCL n=27; censored=13 Median PFS: 6.72 Mos CI: 2.82-NR 6 ( 22%) Transplant Time (Months)

Response: Duvelisib and Bortezomib (Arm B) by Histology All Dose Levels Histology Patients ORR Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma 16 7 (44%) 4 (25%) AITL/TFH 4 3 (75%) 2 (50%) PTCL, NOS 8 4 (50%) 2 (25%) ALCL 2 0% 0 Extranodal Nasal NK/TCL 1 0% 0 ATLL 1 0% 0 Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma 15 4 (27%) 0 Sezary Syndrome 6 3 (50%) 0 Mycosis Fungoides 9 1 (11%) 0 Large Cell Transformation* 6 0 0 Overall 31 11 [35%] 4 (13%)

Arm B Progression-Free Survival, all dose levels Progression Free Survival Probability (%) + Censored Transplant CTCL n=15; censored=4 Median PFS: 4.56 Mos CI: 2.00-14.75 1 patient Transplant PTCL n=16; censored=4 Median PFS: 4.39 Mos CI: 0.98-11.11 Time (Months)

Response: Single Agent Duvelisib Lead In Cycle Pts LEAD IN cycle Dose N DL 3; Duvelisib (75mg PO, BID) 14 DL1 Duvelisib (25mg PO, BID) 12

Response: Single Agent Duvelisib Lead In Cycle Pts LEAD IN cycle Dose DL 3; Duvelisib (75mg PO, BID) N 14 Response post lead in cycle - Arm A PR ORR - single agent lead in 29% [4/14] 21% [3/14] 50% [7/14] DL1 Duvelisib (25mg PO, BID) 12

Response: Single Agent Duvelisib Lead In Cycle Pts LEAD IN cycle Dose DL 3; Duvelisib (75mg PO, BID) N 14 Response post lead in cycle - Arm A PR ORR - single agent lead in 29% [4/14] 21% [3/14] 50% [7/14] Response to Arm A Duv + Romi PR ORR - Combo 10% [1/10] 30% [3/10] 40% [4/10] DL1 Duvelisib (25mg PO, BID) 12

Response: Single Agent Duvelisib Lead In Cycle Pts LEAD IN cycle Dose DL 3; Duvelisib (75mg PO, BID) N 14 Response post lead in cycle - Arm A PR ORR - single agent lead in 29% [4/14] 21% [3/14] 50% [7/14] Response to Arm A Duv + Romi PR ORR - Combo 10% [1/10] 30% [3/10] 40% [4/10] DL1 Duvelisib (25mg PO, BID) 12 Response post lead in cycle - Arm B PR ORR - single agent lead in 25% [3/12] 17% [2/12] 41% [5/12]

Response: Single Agent Duvelisib Lead In Cycle Pts LEAD IN cycle Dose DL 3; Duvelisib (75mg PO, BID) N 14 Response post lead in cycle - Arm A PR ORR - single agent lead in 29% [4/14] 21% [3/14] 50% [7/14] Response to Arm A Duv + Romi PR ORR - Combo 10% [1/10] 30% [3/10] 40% [4/10] DL1 Duvelisib (25mg PO, BID) 12 Response post lead in cycle - Arm B 25% [3/12] Response to Arm B Duv + Bortez 10% [1/9] PR 17% [2/12] PR 20% [2/9] ORR - single agent lead in 41% [5/12] ORR - Combo 33% [3/9]

ARM A (Duvelisib + Romidepsin): Gr. 3-4 Adverse Events occurring in 10% of patients Event Total # of patients at MTD n=31 initiated with single agent lead in cycle n=10 initiated with combination n=21 Transaminase 7 (23%) 4 (40%) 3 (14%) ALT 5 (16%) 3 (30%) 2 (10%) AST 2 (6%) 1 (10%) 1 (5%) Diarrhea 6 (19%) 2 (20%) 4 (19%) Hyponatremia 4 (13%) Neutrophil count decreased 10 (32%) Single agent Duvelisib Grade 3-4 Transaminase (ALT) at 75 mg bid 40% Platelet count decreased 3 (10%)

ARM B (Duvelisib + Bortezomib): Gr. 3-4 Adverse Events occurring in 10% of patients Event Total # of patients at MTD n=23 initiated with single agent lead in cycle n=10 initiated with combination at MTD n=13 Transaminase* 2 (8%) 2 (20%) 0% Alanine aminotransferase increased (ALT) Aspartate aminotransferase increased (AST) 2 (4%) 1 (10%) 0% 1 (4%) 1 (10%) 0% Neutrophil Count Decrease 5 (22%) 3 (30%) 2 (15%)

Conclusions MTD of Duvelisib in combination with Romidepsin was 75 mg bid vs 25 mg bid when combined with Bortezomib. Combination show reasonable safety and tolerability at MTDs Not apparently in excess of single agents at MTD Duvelisib in combination with Romidepsin may have less transaminitis when started simultaneously-allowing higher doses to be given for a longer duration of time Duvelisib in combination with Romidepsin is active with ORR 55% and 24%, (? PTCL>CTCL) Median PFS 6 months, confounded by 6 subjects proceeded to allogeneic SCT Duvelisib in combination with Bortezomib ORR 35% and 14%, (? PTCL>CTCL) Single agent Duvelisib led to responses and s at both 75 mg bid and 25 mg bid

Further Questions Samples avail # of patients Baseline On Tx EOT/POD Total 66 58 43 20 121 Translational biomarker component (Dave Weinstock) Multi-target immunofluorescence for immune subset analysis and macrophage polarization RNAseq Exome sequencing Quantitative Phosphoproteomics Clinical Trials Further expansion of Duvelisib and Romidepsin for PTCL (phase 2; N=50) PRIMO Study (Verastem sponsor) Phase 2 Single agent Duvelisib Dose optimization in Cohort 1 (ongoing) allowing intra-patient dose escalation Cohort 2, N=100 at optimal dose

Lymphoma DMT at MSK Alison Moskowitz Andrew Zelenetz Lia Palomba Anita Kumar Paul Hamlin Andy Intlekofer Matt Matasar Ariela Noy David Straus Gottfried von Keudell Anas Younes Connie Batlevi Santosh Vardhana Donald Colbourn Ildefonso Rodriguez-Rivera Paola Ghione Joachim Yahalom Ahmet Dogan Oscar Lin Travis Holmann Patricia Myskowski Sarah Noor LLS SCOR Investigators Youn Kim, Stanford Michael Khodadoust, Stanford Ranjana Advani, Stanford Eric Jacobsen, DFCI David Fisher, DFCI Neha Mehta Shah, WUSTL Jia Ruan, WCMC Julie Vose, UNMC Matt Lunning, UNMC Jonathan Schatz, UMiami Jasmine Zain, COH Andrei Shustov, FHC Pierluigi Porcu,TJU Farhad Khimani, Moffit Acknowledgments Clinical Research Staff Theresa Davey Helen Hancock Alexandra Bahgat William Blouin Natasha Galasso Nivetha Ganesan Veenna Minnal Obadi Obadi Erin Jeter Sophia Fong Jessie Schweiterman Kristen McDaniels Anne Fischer Linda Lee Abeer Butt Evan Marzouk Hallie Jester Marianne Tawa MSK Biospecimen Team Marissa Mattar Sawsan Boutemine LLS SCOR Leaders Dave Weinstock DFCI, PI Jon Aster-DFCI Giorgio Inghirami-WCMC Craig Thompson Andy Intlekofer ----------------------------- LLS Cycle for Survival NCCN This is an investigator-sponsored trial (NCT02783625) with research support from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Infinity Pharmaceuticals (Cambridge, MA) and Verastem, Inc. (Needham, MA)