Current Literature In Clinical Science How to Advance the Debate on Nonspecific vs Specific Seizure Type and Comorbidity Profile Risk-Taking Behavior in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy. Wandschneider, B, Centeno, M, Vollmar, C, Stretton, J, O Muircheartaigh, J, Thompson, PJ, Kumari, V, Symms, M, Barker, GJ, Duncan, JS, Richardson, MP, Koepp, MJ, Epilepsia 2013:54;2158 2165 Objective: Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) often present with risk-taking behavior, suggestive of frontal lobe dysfunction. Recent studies confirm functional and microstructural changes within the frontal lobes in JME. This study aimed at characterizing decision-making behavior in JME and its neuronal correlates using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri). Methods: We investigated impulsivity in 21 JME patients and 11 controls using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), which measures decision making under ambiguity. Performance on the IGT was correlated with activation patterns during an fmri working memory task. Results: Both patients and controls learned throughout the task. Post hoc analysis revealed a greater proportion of patients with seizures than seizure-free patients having difficulties in advantageous decision making, but no difference in performance between seizure-free patients and controls. Functional imaging of working memory networks showed that overall poor IGT performance was associated with an increased activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in JME patients. Impaired learning during the task and ongoing seizures were associated with bilateral medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) and presupplementary motor area, right superior frontal gyrus, and left DLPFC activation. Significance: Our study provides evidence that patients with JME and ongoing seizures learn significantly less from previous experience. Interictal dysfunction within normal working memory networks, specifically, within the DLPFC and medial PFC structures, may affect their ability to learn. Clinical Predictors of the Long-Term Social Outcome and Quality of Life in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy: 20 65 Years of Follow-up. Schneider-von Podewils, F, Gasse, C, Geithner, J, Wang, ZI, Bombach, P, Berneiser, J, Herzer, R, Kessler, Runge, U. Epilepsia 2014:55;322 330. Objective: The long-term social outcome in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is still controversial. The aim of this study was both to investigate the long-term social outcome in relation to clinical variables and to identify epilepsy-related factors that affect the quality of life (QoL) in JME patients with a follow-up of at least 20 years. Methods: A retrospective selection of 33 of 90 patients (21 female) from a tertiary epilepsy center diagnosed with JME and followed for 20 years (mean 37.8 years) was studied. All patients were evaluated with a thorough review of their medical records, and a subsequent face-to-face or telephone interview. QOLIE-31-P questionnaire (QoL In Epilepsy) and Beck Depression Inventory-II were used to assess the QoL and the presence and severity of depressive symptoms, respectively. Results: Of 33 patients, 18 (54.5%) became seizure-free; in 4 of the patients (22.2%), antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment was discontinued. Early and long-term seizure freedom improves both social adjustment (p = 0.02) and occupational integration (p = 0.02) and associates with a better QoL (odds ratio [OR] 2.25). A high seizure burden highly affects both aspects of personal life family and work; notably the occurrence of frequent and/or late onset generalized tonic clonic seizures increases the risk of concomitant diseases (p = 0.05) and lifelong AED treatment (p = 0.03), decreases the patient s employability (p = 0.02), increases the rate of employment disability pension (p = 0.05), and considerably increases public/social spending. Seizure freedom significantly increases the QoL (p = 0.001), whereas more severe courses of epilepsy (OR 3.2), AED side effects (p = 0.04), depression (p = 0.02), and sleep disturbances (OR 2.7) considerably decrease the patient s QoL. Significance: Although patients with JME are a heterogeneous group, Epilepsy Currents, Vol. 14, No. 4 (July/August) 2014 pp. 191 193 American Epilepsy Society 191
Nonspecific vs Specific Seizure Type and Comorbidity Profile several predictors for the long-term social, family, educational, and occupational outcome have been identified in our study and should be considered in the effort to both improve the patient s QoL as well as preserve economic resources. Long-Term Outcome in Epilepsy with Grand Mal on Awakening: Forty Years of Follow-up. Holtkamp, M, Kowski, AB, Merkle, H, Janz, D. Ann Neurol. In press. Epilepsy with grand mal on awakening (EGMA) is a well-defined subtype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Patients with follow-up of at least 20 years were assessed retrospectively regarding 5-year terminal seizure remission. Forty-two patients were included (mean age = 60 ± 13 years). After follow-up of 40 ± 13 years, 26 patients (62%) were in remission, 5 without antiepileptic drugs. Age at investigation (odds ratio = 0.939, 95% confidence interval = 0.887 0.994, p = 0.029) independently predicted lacking remission. Nineteen patients (45.2%) had withdrawn from antiepileptic drugs at least once; 12 of those (63.2%) had seizure relapse. EGMA has a favorable long-term prognosis. With increasing age and treatment duration, antiepileptic drug withdrawal may be justified. Commentary The findings of these three papers are an important reminder about the functional relevance of seizure control and antiepileptic drug compliance in patients with seizures triggered in the transition between sleep and awakening. The Wandschneider et al. study focuses on short-term daily functioning, measured by decision making/impulsivity, executive functions, and the working memory network. The Schneider-von-Poderwelis et al. study describes long-term functioning of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) patients followed for 20 years using employment, disability, social adjustment, depression, and quality of life measures. As demonstrated in other long-term population and hospital outcome JME studies (see review in [1]), most of these patients continue to have seizures and depression, social isolation, unemployment, and social impulsiveness despite relative educational success. Poor decision making in JME patients, evident in the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) used by Wandschneier et al., was associated with increased activation during a visual working memory task in the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, but not in other parts of the visual memory network. This might reflect involvement of mainly verbal reasoning in the decision making of the IGT task and/or the lack of significant differences in the executive function skills of the JME and control groups. Increased dorsal lateral prefrontal activation during an executive function task might also represent the increased effort (2) the JME patients needed to perform the visual memory dual n-back task. Since the JME and control groups have similar scores on frontal lobe tasks, Wandschneier et al. stated that their imaging findings suggest that functional imaging might pick up subtle deficits not noted in neuropsychological testing. Impulsivity, poor future planning, difficulty making choices based on both implicit and explicit information, and incorporating this information into future planning (impaired executive functions) are features of JME patients, as well as of patients with other seizure types (see review in [3]). Different epilepsy syndromes are also associated with the same wide range of psychiatric disorders (depression, anxiety, and psychosis) and suicidal behavior (see review in 3). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is prevalent in children and youth with epilepsy (4), and continues into adulthood in children without epilepsy (5). Nevertheless, this disorder has not been studied in adults with epilepsy, despite the high rates of inattention on neuropsychological testing (see review in 3) and impulsivity (6) on behavioral testing. Furthermore, patients with the previously mentioned psychiatric disorders and with suicidality also have increased prevalence of epilepsy (7). Like patients with epilepsy, patients with psychiatric disorders but no epilepsy have varying degrees of impaired cognition and executive function, poor social adjustment, and problems with employment. Therefore, the similar cognitive, psychiatric, social, and occupational profile of epilepsy patients, irrespective of syndrome implies that the comorbidities are part of the disorder, reflect large scale brain involvement, and not the type of seizure. However, we still do not yet know if the brain mechanisms underlying each of the comorbidities are the same or different across epilepsy syndromes. The psychiatric literature clearly indicates that there are similarities and differences in the regional cortical and subcortical structural and functional abnormalities, and their association with the clinical, cognitive, social, and outcome in schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, and ADHD. To examine the similarities and differences in the mechanisms of the comorbidities of epilepsy, future studies should involve multimodal imaging and EEG, and recruit large representative samples of epilepsy patients with different epilepsy syndromes with and without the comorbidities who have variable seizure burden and include seizure-free patients. Prospective well-powered studies will help identify structural and functional brain biomarkers that determine if and how the comorbidities in different epilepsy syndromes evolve over time and respond to treatment of seizures and of the comorbidities. In addition, transitions from sleep to awakening in JME (8), and in generalized tonic-clonic seizures on awakening, play a role in the pathophysiology of these epilepsy syndromes. Sleep disturbances are also found in patients who do not have epilepsy but have depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia and other psychoses, and ADHD (9). 192
Nonspecific vs Specific Seizure Type and Comorbidity Profile Abnormal sleep is found in different epilepsy syndromes (see review in [10]) and is also associated with impaired cognitive functioning and behavior (11, 12). Therefore, studies that examine if the sleep abnormalities in these seizure disorders contribute to the associated psychopathology and cognitive impairments found in epilepsy would advance our knowledge on the underlying mechanisms of these comorbidities. In terms of take home clinical messages, in their 20-year follow-up of JME patients Schneider-von-Poderwelis et al. found that poor quality of life was related to a severe course of epilepsy (recurrent uncontrolled seizures), antiepileptic drug adverse effects, depression, and sleep disturbances. Several studies have shown that epilepsy patients with depression experience increased adverse effects for antiepileptic drugs (13), and sleep disturbance is a common symptom of depression. In addition, in JME adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs can lead to pseudoresistance due to treatment noncompliance with subsequent poor seizure control (1). The association among these different variables (poor seizure control, depression, antiepileptic drug adverse effects, sleep disturbances, and pseudoresistance) underscores the need to rule out depression in all JME patients with poor seizure control and/or adverse antiepileptic drug effects. An additional clinical take home message is Wandschneider and colleagues conclusion regarding the implications of the poor decision making of the JME patients who were not seizure free. Furthermore, clinicians should be aware of the far-reaching effects on daily living in epilepsy patients with deficits on neuropsychological testing. For example, impaired executive function and decision making, together with slow learning from experience (evident in the IGT test) and impulsivity, can lead to poor judgment, which in turn, impacts behavior and emotional responses, social interactions, educational achievements, and occupational functioning. Long-term outcome findings in epilepsy studies demonstrate dysfunction in these domains that appears to be unrelated to the epilepsy syndrome (14, 15). by Rochelle Caplan, MD References 1. Baykan B, Martínez-Juárez IE, Altindag EA, Camfield CS, Camfield PR. Lifetime prognosis of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2013:28(supp 1):S18 S24. 2. Manoach DS, Greve DN, Lindgren KA, Dale AM. Identifying regional activity associated with temporally separated components of working memory using event-related functional MRI. Neuroimage 2003;20:1670 1684. 3. Lin JJ, Mula M, Hermann BP. Uncovering the neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy over the lifespan. Lancet 380;1180 1192. 4. Dunn DW, Austin JK, Harezlak J, Ambrosius WT. ADHD and epilepsy in childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:50 54. 5. Wilens T, Biederman J, Spencer TJ. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan. Annu Rev Med 2002;53:113 131. 6. Moschetta S, Valente KD. Impulsivity and seizure frequency, but not cognitive deficits, impact social adjustment in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia 2013;54:866 870. 7. Adelöw C, Andersson T, Ahlbom A, Tomson T. Hospitalization for psychiatric disorders before and after onset of unprovoked seizures/ epilepsy. Neurology 2012;78:396 401. 8. Serafini A, Rubboli G, Gigli GL, Koutroumanidis M, Gelisse P. Neurophysiology of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2013;28(suppl 1):S30 S39. 9. Silvestri R, Gagliano A, Aricò I, Calarese T, Cedro C, Bruni O, Condurso R, Germanò E, Gervasi G, Siracusano R, Vita G, Bramanti P. Sleep disorders in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) recorded overnight by video-polysomnography. Sleep Med 2009;10:1132 1138. 10. van Golde EGA, Gutter T, de Weerd AW. Sleep disturbances in people with epilepsy; prevalence, impact and treatment. Sleep Med Rev 2011;15:357 368. 11. Ebus S, Arends J, Hendriksen J, van der Horst E, de la Parra N, Hendriksen R, Santegoeds E, Boon P, Aldenkamp B. Cognitive effects of interictal epileptiform discharges in children. Eur J Paed Neurol 2012;16:697 706. 12. Tang S, Clarke Tara, Owens J, Pal D K. Sleep behavior disturbances in Rolandic epilepsy. J Child Neurol 2011;26:239 243. 13. Kanner AM, Barry JJ, Gilliam F, Hermann B, Meador KJ, Depressive and anxiety disorders in epilepsy: Do they differ in their potential to worsen common antiepileptic drug related adverse events Epilepsia 2012;53:1104 1108. 14. Camfield C, Camfield PR. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy 25 years after seizure onset: a population-based study. Neurology, 2009;73:1041 1045. 15. Sillanpää M, Schmidt D, Natural history of treated childhood-onset epilepsy: prospective, long-term population-based study. Brain 2006;129:617 624. 193
American Epilepsy Society Epilepsy Currents Journal Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest Instructions The purpose of this form is to provide readers of your manuscript with information about your other interests that could influence how they receive and understand your work. Each author should submit a separate form and is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the submitted information. The form is in four parts. 1. Identifying information. Enter your full name. If you are NOT the main contributing author, please check the box no and enter the name of the main contributing author in the space that appears. Provide the requested manuscript information. 2. The work under consideration for publication. This section asks for information about the work that you have submitted for publication. The time frame for this reporting is that of the work itself, from the initial conception and planning to the present. The requested information is about resources that you received, either directly or indirectly (via your institution), to enable you to complete the work. Checking No means that you did the work without receiving any financial support from any third party that is, the work was supported by funds from the same institution that pays your salary and that institution did not receive third-party funds with which to pay you. If you or your institution received funds from a third party to support the work, such as a government granting agency, charitable foundation or commercial sponsor, check Yes. Then complete the appropriate boxes to indicate the type of support and whether the payment went to you, or to your institution, or both. 3. Relevant financial activities outside the submitted work. This section asks about your financial relationships with entities in the bio-medical arena that could be perceived to influence, or that give the appearance of potentially influencing, what you wrote in the submitted work. For example, if your article is about testing an epidermal growth factor receptor (DGFR) antagonist in lung cancer, you should report all associations with entities pursuing diagnostic or therapeutic strategies in cancer in general, not just in the area of EGFR or lung cancer. Report all sources of revenue paid (or promised to be paid) directly to you or your institution on your behalf over the 36 months prior to submission of the work. This should include all monies from sources with relevance to the submitted work, not just monies from the entity that sponsored the research. Please note that your interactions with the work s sponsor that are outside the submitted work should also be listed here. If there is any question, it is usually better to disclose a relationship than not to do so. For grants you have received for work outside the submitted work, you should disclose support ONLY from entities that could be perceived to be affected financially by the published work, such as drug companies, or foundations supported by entities that could be perceived to have a financial stake in the outcome. Public funding sources, such as government agencies, charitable foundations or academic institutions, need not be disclosed. For example, if a government agency sponsored a study in which you have been involved and drugs were provided by a pharmaceutical company, you need only list the pharmaceutical company. 4. Other relationships Use this section to report other relationships or activities that readers could perceive to have influenced, or that give the appearance of potentially influencing, what you wrote in the submitted work.
American Epilepsy Society Epilepsy Currents Journal Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest Section #1 Identifying Information 1. Today s Date: March 27, 2014 2. First Name Rochelle Last Name Caplan Degree MD 3. Are you the Main Assigned Author? Yes No If no, enter your name as co-author: 4. Manuscript/Article Title: How to advance the debate on non-specific vs. specific seizure type and comorbidity profile 5. Journal Issue you are submitting for: Epilepsy Currents 14.4 Section #2 The Work Under Consideration for Publication Did you or your institution at any time receive payment or services from a third party for any aspect of the submitted work (including but not limited to grants, data monitoring board, study design, manuscript preparation, statistical analysis, etc.)? Complete each row by checking No or providing the requested information. If you have more than one relationship just add rows to this table. Type No Money Paid to You Money to Your Institution* Name of Entity Comments** 1. Grant 2. Consulting fee or honorarium 3. Support for travel to meetings for the study or other purposes 4. Fees for participating in review activities such as data monitoring boards, statistical analysis, end point committees, and the like 5. Payment for writing or reviewing the manuscript 6. Provision of writing assistance, medicines, equipment, or administrative support. 7. Other * This means money that your institution received for your efforts on this study. ** Use this section to provide any needed explanation. Page 2 8/11/2014
Section #3 Relevant financial activities outside the submitted work. Place a check in the appropriate boxes in the table to indicate whether you have financial relationships (regardless of amount of compensation) with entities as described in the instructions. Use one line for each entity; add as many lines as you need by clicking the Add box. You should report relationships that were present during the 36 months prior to submission. Complete each row by checking No or providing the requested information. If you have more than one relationship just add rows to this table. Type of relationship (in alphabetical order) No Name of Entity Comments** 1. Board membership 2. Consultancy 3. Employment 4. Expert testimony Money Paid to You Money to Your Institution* 5. Grants/grants pending $9012 NINDS NS31146, NS044351 6. Payment for lectures including service on speakers bureaus 7. Payment for manuscript preparation. 8. Patents (planned, pending or issued) 9. Royalties $125 Oxford University Press Author of "How many more questions?" 10. Payment for development of educational presentations 11. Stock/stock options 12. Travel/accommodations/meeti ng expenses unrelated to activities listed.** 13. Other (err on the side of full disclosure) * This means money that your institution received for your efforts. ** For example, if you report a consultancy above there is no need to report travel related to that consultancy on this line. Section #4 Other relationships Are there other relationships or activities that readers could perceive to have influenced, or that give the appearance of potentially influencing, what you wrote in the submitted work? No other relationships/conditions/circumstances that present a potential conflict of interest. Yes, the following relationships/conditions/circumstances are present: Thank you for your assistance. Page 3 8/11/2014
Epilepsy Currents Editorial Board Page 4 8/11/2014