The radiologic workup of a palpable breast mass

Similar documents
Imaging in breast cancer. Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since

Ultrasound of the Breast BASICS FOR THE ORDERING CLINICIAN

Leonard M. Glassman MD

Breast Imaging Lexicon

ACRIN 6666 IM Additional Evaluation: Additional Views/Targeted US

Amammography report is a key component of the breast

Breast imaging of benign fat containing lesions

Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast

Breast Health. Learning Objectives. Breast Anatomy. Poll Question. Breast Anatomy

Imaging of giant breast masses with pathological correlation

Breast imaging in general practice

Ultrasonography. Methods. Brief Description. Indications. Device-related Prerequisites. Technical Requirements. Evaluation Criteria

Cairo/EG, Khartoum/SD, London/UK Biological effects, Diagnostic procedure, Ultrasound, Mammography, Breast /ecr2015/C-0107

Criteria of Malignancy. Evaluation Score

ORIGINAL ARTICLE EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS USING X-RAY MAMMOGRAM WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION

Case Report Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: Advantages and Limitations of Breast Tomosynthesis

BI-RADS Update. Martha B. Mainiero, MD, FACR, FSBI Brown University Rhode Island Hospital

ISSN X (Print) Research Article. *Corresponding author Dr. Amlendu Nagar

MEDICAL IMAGING AND BREAST DISEASE HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

Case Scenario 1 History and Physical 3/15/13 Imaging Pathology

RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF BREAST CANCER

THE MALE BREAST CARCINOMA: EARLY DETECTION HOPE. Author (s) Supreethi Kohli a, Pragya Garg b

Gynecomastia and Its Mimics: Not All Male Breast Lesions are Benign

Epworth Healthcare Benign Breast Disease Symposium. Sat Nov 12 th 2016

Cystic Masses of the Breast

Breast Pathology in Men: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

University of Washington Radiology Review Course: Strange and Specific Diagnoses. Case #1

Using T2-Weighted Sequences to More Accurately Characterize Breast Masses Seen on MRI

Mammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions. Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand

Lesion Imaging Characteristics Mass, Favoring Benign Circumscribed Margins Intramammary Lymph Node

AMSER Case of the Month: September 2018

Imaging the Symptomatic Patient. Avice M.O Connell MD,FACR,FSBI Professor of Imaging Sciences Director, Women s Imaging University of Rochester

Mammographic evaluation of palpable breast masses with pathological correlation: a tertiary care centre study in Nepal

Original Report. Mucocele-Like Tumors of the Breast: Mammographic and Sonographic Appearances. Katrina Glazebrook 1 Carol Reynolds 2

S. Murgo, MD. Chr St-Joseph, Mons Erasme Hospital, Brussels

Original Report. Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast: Clinical, Mammographic, and Sonographic Findings with Histopathologic Correlation

Mousa. Israa Ayed. Abdullah AlZibdeh. 0 P a g e

Mammography and Subsequent Whole-Breast Sonography of Nonpalpable Breast Cancers: The Importance of Radiologic Breast Density

Alena Levit MD Avice O Connell MD University of Rochester, Rochester, NY

Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography and Breast Ultrasound During Pregnancy and Lactation

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; spectrum of imaging findings.

Common Breast Problems: Breast Pain

Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients

Mary Smania, DNP, FNP-BC Clinical Practice Champion Assistant Professor Michigan State University College of Nursing

Fat Necrosis: A Grand Imposter

Benign, Reactive and Inflammatory Lesions of the Breast

AMSER Case of the Month: November 2018

DISORDERS OF THE BREAST Dated. FIBROADENOSIS Other common names: mastitis, fibrocystic disease, cystic mammary dysplasia.

Evaluation of Abnormal Screening Mammograms

A GP S APPROACH TO BREAST LUMPS AND SYMPTOMS DR KK CHEUNG GPGC WORKSHOP

Papillary Lesions of the Breast: MRI, Ultrasound, and Mammographic Appearances

Short-Term Follow-Up of Palpable Breast Lesions With Benign Imaging Features: Evaluation of 375 Lesions in 320 Women

Table 1. Classification of US Features Based on BI-RADS for US in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions US Features Benign n(%) Malignant n(%) Odds

Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia: Imaging Findings With Pathologic and Clinical Correlation

Primary Breast Liposarcoma

Abid Irshad, MD Director Breast Imaging. Medical University of South Carolina Charleston

Current Imaging Diagnosis of the Breast Tumors

Segmental Breast Calcifications

Malignant transformation of fibroadenomas

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

8/31/2016 HIDING IN PLAIN SITE, ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS AND BREAST ASYMMETRIES ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS

Standard Breast Imaging Modalities. Lilian Wang, M.D. Breast Imaging Section Department of Radiology Northwestern Medicine

SIGNIFICANT OTHERS. Miscellaneous Benign Breast Conditions

Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; December 2016: Vol.-6, Issue- 1, P

BI-RADS and Breast MRI. Kathy Borovicka, M.D. Thursday February 15, 2018

Avoiding Pitfalls in Mammographic Interpretation

Architectural Distortion of

UNC Breast Imaging Division July 2018

Mimickers of breast malignancy

Radiologic Findings of Mucocele-like Tumors of the breast: Can we differentiate pure benign from associated with high risk lesions?

Triple-negative breast cancer: which typical features can we identify on conventional and MRI imaging?

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Radiological Appearances of Male Breast Disease

PAAF vs Core Biopsy en Lesiones Mamarias Case #1

Breast Ultrasound: Improving Your Skills & Patient Care

Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips

Pitfalls and Limitations of Breast MRI. Susan Orel Roth, MD Professor of Radiology University of Pennsylvania

Practical and illustrated summary of updated BI-RADS for ultrasonography

BR 1 Palpable breast lump

Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound

Pure and Mixed Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: Mammographic and Sonographic Differential Features

Evaluation of breast lesions with ultrasonography and colour doppler

MRI features of Triple-negative breast cancer: our experience.

CPC 4 Breast Cancer. Rochelle Harwood, a 35 year old sales assistant, presents to her GP because she has noticed a painless lump in her left breast.

Invasive Ductal Carcinoma with Fibrotic Focus: Mammographic and Sonographic Findings with Histopathologic Correlation

DR AISHA A UMAR CHIEF CONSULTANT RADIOLOGIST NATIONAL HOSPITAL ABUJA.

OPTO-ACOUSTIC BREAST IMAGING

Inflammatory Breast Carcinoma: Mammographic, Ultrasonographic, MRI and Pathologic Findings

BREAST PATHOLOGY. Fibrocystic Changes

Solid Breast Nodules: Use of Sonography to Distinguish between Benign and Malignant Lesions

Case Scenario 1: This case has been slightly modified from the case presented during the live session to add clarity.

PLACE LABEL HERE. ACRIN 6657 MRI Form: Pre-Treatment (MRI-1)

EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY

Here are examples of bilateral analog mammograms from the same patient including CC and MLO projections.

ANNEX 1 OBJECTIVES. At the completion of the training period, the fellow should be able to:

Triple Receptor Negative Breast Cancer: Imaging and Clinical Characteristics

Diseases of the breast (1 of 2)

Cystic Hypersecretory Carcinoma of the Breast:

The Sonographic Findings and Differing Clinical Implications of Simple, Complicated, and Complex Breast Cysts

Transcription:

Imaging in Practice CME CREDIT EDUCTIONL OJECTIVE: The reader will consider which breast masses require further workup and which imaging study is most appropriate Lauren Stein, MD Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Melanie Chellman-Jeffers, MD Center for Specialized Women s Health and Section of reast Imaging, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic The radiologic workup of a palpable breast mass bstract The finding of a palpable breast mass on physical examination often warrants a radiologic workup including directed ultrasonography, diagnostic mammography, and, at times, biopsy with ultrasonographic guidance. The choice of initial imaging study is most often guided by the patient s age at presentation. Communicating the clinical findings to both the patient and the radiologist helps ensure the selection of the most appropriate imaging studies and helps in the interpretation of those studies. Every woman with a palpable breast mass, regardless of her age, should undergo imaging to exclude or establish the diagnosis of cancer. Key Points Typically, in women under age 30, ultrasonography is the first or the only test ordered to evaluate the abnormality. In women age 30 or older, diagnostic mammography is typically the first test ordered. On mammography, a suspicious palpable mass has an irregular shape with spiculated margins. benign mass typically has a round shape with well-circumscribed margins. When mammography is required during pregnancy, the patient can be reassured that it will not jeopardize her fetus because the radiation dose is very low and the abdomen and pelvis can be shielded. doi:10.3949/ccjm.76a.08015 28-year-old woman comes in for her annual checkup. Her physician notices a palpable, painless, 1-cm, well-demarcated mass in the left breast at the 3 o clock position 2 cm from the nipple, with no associated skin changes, nipple retraction, or discharge. The patient has no personal or family history of breast cancer. Given the patient s age, physical findings, and medical history, the clinician believes it unlikely that the patient has cancer. How should she proceed with the workup of this patient? Physical findings of a breast mass are not exclusive reast cancer is the most common female malignancy and the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. 1 The incidence is low in young women and increases with advancing age. enign breast disease is common in young women and less common in postmenopausal women. 2,3 However, the discovery of a breast mass, whether by the woman herself or by a clinician, is a common occurrence and distressing for any woman. enign lesions tend to have discrete, welldefined margins and are typically mobile. Malignant lesions may be firm, may have indistinct borders, and are often immobile. 2 lthough most breast masses found by palpation are benign, imaging is the critical next step in the workup to help determine if the mass is benign or malignant. enign palpable masses include: Cysts ( figure 1) Fibroadenomas ( figure 2) CLEVELND CLINIC JOURNL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 76 NUMER 3 MRCH 2009 175

Palpable reast Mass C On examination, note the clockface location, size, texture, tenderness, and mobility of the lump FIGURE 1. simple cyst in the left breast. ll three mammographic views craniocaudal (), mediolateral oblique (), and spot-compression (C) show a round, well-circumscribed mass in the mid-breast. Ultrasonography (D) shows a round, wellcircumscribed anechoic lesion with a sharply defined posterior wall and posterior acoustic enhancement. Prominent fat lobules Lymph nodes Oil cysts Lipomas Hamartomas ( figure 3) Hematomas Fat necrosis Galactoceles. Malignant palpable masses include: Invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma ( figure 4) Ductal carcinoma in situ (which rarely presents as a palpable mass.) History and PHYSICL Examination To ensure that imaging provides the most useful information about a palpable breast lump, D it is important to first do a careful history and physical examination. Important aspects of the history include family history, personal history of breast cancer, and any previous breast biopsies. The onset and duration of the palpable mass, changes in its size, the relationship of these changes to the menstrual cycle, and the presence or lack of tenderness are additional important elements of the history. On examination, it is important to note the clock-face location, size, texture, tender- 176 CLEVELND CLINIC JOURNL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 76 NUMER 3 MRCH 2009

STEIN ND CHELLMN-JEFFERS C FIGURE 2. Fibroadenoma. On mammography, the craniocaudal () and mediolateral oblique () views with a bright metallic marker (arrows) show a round, well-circumscribed mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast. Ultrasonography (C) shows an oval, well-circumscribed, mildly heterogeneous, hypoechoic mass that is wider than tall, indicating a benign mass. ness, and mobility of the lump. ccompanying nipple discharge and skin erythema or retraction are also important to report. In addition to conveying the location of the mass to the radiologist, it is equally important that the patient know what features the physician feels. This way, if the clinical information from the ordering physician is not available at the time of the radiologic evaluation, the patient will be able to guide the radiologist to the region of concern. Imaging TEChniques Mammography and ultrasonography are the primary imaging studies for evaluating palpable breast masses. Typically, in women under age 30, ultrasonography is the first or the only test ordered to evaluate the abnormality. 4 In women age 30 or older, diagnostic mammography is typically the first test ordered. If mammography indicates that the palpable mass is not benign, then ultrasonography is the next study to be done. 3 lthough a powerful tool, magnetic resonance imaging of the breast does not currently have a role in the workup of a palpable abnormality and should not be used as a decision-delaying tactic or in place of biopsy. Screening or diagnostic mammography? Mammography is used in both screening and diagnosis. Screening mammography consists of two standard views of each breast craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique and is appropriate for asymptomatic women. Women age 30 or older who present with a palpable breast mass require diagnostic mammography, in which standard mammographic views are obtained, as well as additional views (eg, tangential or spot-compression views) to better define the area of clinical concern. In a tangential view, a metallic skin marker is placed on the skin overlying the site of the palpable abnormality. On mammography, a suspicious palpable mass has an irregular shape with spiculated margins. benign mass typically has a round shape with well-circumscribed margins. If the palpable abnormality is not mammographically benign (eg, if it does not look like a lymph node, lipoma, or degenerating fibroadenoma), then ultrasonography is performed. Mammography is less sensitive in younger Women over age 30 who present with a palpable breast mass require diagnostic mammography CLEVELND CLINIC JOURNL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 76 NUMER 3 MRCH 2009 177

Palpable reast Mass Core-needle biopsy has become more popular than fine-needle aspiration, as it includes surrounding tissue FIGURE 3. Hamartoma. Craniocaudal () and medio lateral oblique () mammographic views of the left breast show an apparently encapsulated, heterogeneous mass that contains fat mixed with fibroglandular tissue. women (ie, under age 30) because their breast tissue tends to be dense and glandular, whereas the tissue becomes more fat-replaced with age. 3 Ultrasonography plays a complementary role Ultrasonography complements diagnostic mammography and can be used as a first imaging study to evaluate a palpable breast mass in a young woman (ie, under age 30) with dense breast tissue. Ultrasonography is helpful in distinguishing cystic lesions from solid masses. It helps the radiologist delineate the shape, borders, and acoustic properties of the mass. It is also performed when a palpable mass is mammographically occult. When a mass appears suspicious on either mammography or ultrasonography, ultrasonography can be used to guide biopsy. suspicious mass on ultrasonography classically appears taller than wide and has posterior acoustic shadowing. Microlobulations and a spiculated margin also raise concern for malignancy. benign sonographic appearance of a palpable mass includes a wider than tall (ellipsoid) shape, with homogeneous echogenicity, and four or fewer gentle lobulations. thin, echogenic capsule also suggests the mass is benign. Core-needle biopsy with ultrasonographic guidance Core-needle biopsy is performed with a largediameter (14-gauge to 18-gauge) needle to obtain tissue cores for histologic analysis. It has gained popularity over fine-needle aspiration because it includes surrounding tissue architecture, thus providing a more definitive histologic diagnosis. Pathologic information obtained from core-needle biopsy allows the radiologist and surgeon to counsel the patient and determine the best surgical management or follow-up imaging study. If a clinician performs fine-needle biopsy in the office, it should be preceded by an imaging workup of the palpable finding. 178 CLEVELND CLINIC JOURNL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 76 NUMER 3 MRCH 2009

STEIN ND CHELLMN-JEFFERS C FIGURE 4. Infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Craniocaudal () and mediolateral oblique () mammographic views of the right breast show an irregular, mildly spiculated, high-density lesion in the posterior, medial breast. Ultrasonography (C) shows an irregularly shaped hypoechoic mass which is taller than wide (a profile tending to indicate malignancy) and has mild posterior acoustic shadowing. What Is appropriate for our 28-year-old patient? ecause she is under age 30, ultrasonography is the initial study of choice to evaluate the mass. If a simple cyst is detected, she can be reassured that the lesion is benign, and no subsequent follow-up is required. If the lesion is a solid mass with benign features, mammography may be considered, the patient may be followed with short-interval imaging (every 6 months) depending on patient-specific factors such as family history, or the mass can be biopsied. If the lesion is a solid mass with suspicious or malignant features, mammography with spot-compression views should be performed, and the patient should undergo core-needle biopsy with ultrasonographic guidance. In a patient age 30 or older, diagnostic mammography is the imaging study of first choice. 3 If the mass is clearly benign on mammography, no additional imaging would be necessary. If mammography fails to image the mass or shows it to have benign features such as fat, then the patient can undergo ultrasonography for further evaluation and confirmation of the clinical and mammographic findings. If the mass appears suspicious or malignant on mammography, ultrasonography is the next step, as it can help characterize the lesion and be used to guide core-needle biopsy. if a pregnant woman has a palpable breast mass Most publications on breast cancer in pregnancy report a prevalence of 3 per 10,000 pregnancies, accounting for 3% of all breast cancers diagnosed. 5 Therefore, imaging evaluation of a palpable mass should not be postponed. Hormonal changes throughout pregnancy may increase the nodularity of breast tissue, raising the concern of palpable masses. dditionally, there is a higher prevalence of galactoceles and lactating adenomas in these patients. ecause contrasting fatty breast tissue is lost during pregnancy and because of the need to minimize radiation exposure, ultrasonography is often the imaging test of first choice. If Ultrasound is often the study used first in pregnancy, but mammography can also be used CLEVELND CLINIC JOURNL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 76 NUMER 3 MRCH 2009 179

Palpable reast Mass mammography is required, the radiation dose is very low and the patient s abdomen and pelvis can be shielded. 6 In this situation, the patient can be reassured that the imaging test is not jeopardizing her fetus. What workup is required in men? reast cancer in men is rare, accounting for less than 0.5% of all cases. 7 Most often, a palpable breast mass in a man presents as unilateral gynecomastia. Gynecomastia occurs in a bimodal age distribution (in the 2nd and 7th decades) and has a variety of hormonal and drug-related causes. Despite the low prevalence of breast cancer in men, the combination of mammography and ultrasonography is recommended for evaluation at all ages. REFERENCES 1. Klein S. Evaluation of palpable breast masses. m Fam Physician 2005; 71:1731 1738. 2. Pruthi S. Detection and evaluation of a palpable breast mass. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76:641 648. 3. Harvey J. Sonography of palpable breast masses. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2006; 27:284 297. 4. Mehta TS. Current uses of ultrasound in the evaluation of the breast. Radiol Clin North m 2003; 41:841 856. 5. Gallenberg MM, Lopines CL. reast cancer and pregnancy. Semin Oncol 1989; 16:369 376. 6. arnavon Y, Wallack MK. Management of the pregnant patient with carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171:347 352. 7. Cardenosa G. The Core Curriculum: reast Imaging. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2003;304. DDRESS: Melanie Chellman-Jeffers, MD, Imaging Institute, Section of reast Imaging, 10, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid venue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail chellmm@ccf.org. Visit our web site at http:// www.ccjm.org Contact us by e-mail at ccjm@ccf.org 180 CLEVELND CLINIC JOURNL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 76 NUMER 3 MRCH 2009