Case 1:09-cv RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Similar documents
Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:15-cv SRC-CLW Document 9 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 246

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 1:19-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED CANNABIS CORPORATION. Plaintiff, PURE HEMP COLLECTIVE INC.

Case 2:09-cv DMC-CCC Document 1 Filed 03/20/2009 Page 1 of 95. Of Counsel:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Civil Action No. 8:14-cv-1322 COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv ECF No. 1 filed 10/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:12-cv KJM-GGH Document 1 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. (Sacramento Division)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Plaintiff, Comfort Dental Group, Inc. ( Comfort Dental ), by its attorneys, MOYE WHITE LLP, states: INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:15-cv PGS-TJB Document 1 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 111 PageID: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Associates, llc, for its Complaint against the defendants, Gary K. DeJohn, Sr. and DeJohn

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 23

Judicial conflict between Bristol-Myers Squibb Co V. Merck & Co Inc. Keytruda V. Opdivo

Case 1:15-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No.: COMPLAINT

Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 24

Case: 3:17-cv wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Case No.: Plaintiffs Tammie Aust, Alison Grennan, Jennifer Schill, and Lang You Mau, by and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:15-cv ARR-VVP Document 1 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendant. COMPLAINT

Case 1:08-cv RMB-AMD Document 737 Filed 04/03/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 39110

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/28/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/28/2017

AFFILIATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DEFAMATION

Case 2:14-cv SDW-SCM Document 28 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 155 PageID: 398 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. COME NOW Plaintiffs by and through their attorneys of record J.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv SEH Document 1 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 12

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/26/18 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

CIGARETTE FIRE SAFETY AND FIREFIGHTER PROTECTION ACT Act of Jul. 4, 2008, P.L. 518, No. 42 Cl. 35 AN ACT

GENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS

If you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from MAGNETIC STIMULATION ( TMS )

U.S. District Court District of Delaware (Wilmington) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv KAJ

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WASHINGTON STATE CAUSE NO SEA

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JTF-dkv Document 1 Filed 09/25/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Attention: Scott D. Tomsky Vice President, US Generics Regulatory Affairs 425 Privet Road Horsham, PA 19044

Z E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy

e-cigarette Regulation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INFORMATION. General Allegations. A. Introduction and Background

REGULATION TO ENSURE THE SANITARY AND SAFE OPERATION OF ADULT-USE MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENTS AND THE SALE OF ADULT-USE MARIJUANA

Case 2:15-cv RWS Document 6 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 80

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 4 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 25 PageID# 299

Case 1:12-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 26

Case 1:17-cv RDM Document 1 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:14-cv JM-WVG Document 1 Filed 11/03/14 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO COMPLAINT

4:18-cv AMQ Date Filed 07/17/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 21

These Rules of Membership apply in respect of all Products purchased by a Member from Sigma (and any Program Partner) on or after 1 February 2017.

Case 2:09-cv RCJ-RJJ Document 1 Filed 07/22/2009 Page 1 of 15

Case 5:04-cv gwc Document 195 Filed 04/16/07 Page 1 of 8

PlainSite. Legal Document

Case 2:12-cv LRH-GWF Document 1 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 26

INGHAM COUNTY. Effective January 1, 2016 as amended November 10, 2015

2:12-cv VAR-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 08/02/12 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

H 7816 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/13/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:19. Exhibit 1

Re: Bayer s false and deceptive marketing for its Men s Multis for prevention of cancer

CSA Briefing Note Regarding Joint Application against the University and Re-Commencing Collection of CFS/CFS-O Fees

48th Judicial District LANGUAGE ACCESS PLAN

Case: 5:15-cr DCR-REW Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/01/15 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1

COMMUNITY HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES

Administering Medicines to Students Asthma Inhaler Exemption

WESTUE RSDDISSTTRRI CTTCAORUKRATN sas

Chapter TOBACCO RETAILER'S PERMIT

Return Date: February 27, 2002

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case 2:10-cv JF-MJH Document 1 Filed 06/07/2010 Page 1 of 47 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 4:18-cv RLW Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/11/18 Page: 1 of 44 PageID #: 1

Transcription:

Case 1:09-cv-04115-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 John E. Flaherty Jonathan M.H. Short McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Four Gateway Center 100 Mulberry Street Newark, New Jersey 07102-4096 (973 622-4444 (telephone (973 624-7070 (facsimile Of Counsel: Denise L. Loring Christopher J. Harnett Pablo D. Hendler Derek M. Kato ROPES & GRAY LLP 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 (212 596-9000 (telephone (212 596-9090 (facsimile Attorneys for Plaintiffs AstraZeneca LP and AstraZeneca AB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA AB, v. BREATH LIMITED Plaintiffs, Defendant. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs AstraZeneca LP and AstraZeneca AB (collectively, AstraZeneca for their Complaint herein, aver as follows:

Case 1:09-cv-04115-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 2 NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for a judgment of patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has original jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338(a, and 2201. 3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over defendant because counsel for Breath Limited ( Breath stated that Breath will consent to jurisdiction in the District of New Jersey for any action AstraZeneca might be considering bringing against Breath s ANDA No. 78-404, which is the action averred in this Complaint. 4. Venue is proper in this Judicial District under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b and (c and 1400(b. THE PARTIES 5. AstraZeneca LP is a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of business at 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, Delaware. 6. AstraZeneca AB is a company organized and existing under the laws of Sweden, having its principal place of business at S 151 85 Södertälje, Sweden. 7. AstraZeneca LP is the holder of an approved New Drug Application ( NDA, No. 20-929, for the manufacture and sale of budesonide inhalation suspension for the maintenance treatment of asthma and as a prophylactic therapy in children 12 months to 8 years 2

Case 1:09-cv-04115-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 3 of age. AstraZeneca LP markets and sells this composition in the United States under the trade name PULMICORT RESPULES (budesonide inhalation suspension. 8. Upon information and belief, defendant Breath is a company organized and existing under the laws of the United Kingdom, having its principal place of business at 88 Mount Pleasant, Biggin Hill, Westerham, Kent, United Kingdom. THE PATENT-IN-SUIT 9. AstraZeneca AB is the lawful owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the following United States patent, including all right to sue and to recover for past infringement thereof, which patent contains one or more claims covering PULMICORT RESPULES and its use: A. United States Patent No. 7,524,834, entitled STERILE POWDERS, FORMULATIONS, AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING THE SAME ( the 834 patent, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, which was duly and legally issued April 28, 2009, naming Ann-Kristin Karlsson, Cheryl Larrivee-Elkins, and Ove Molin as the inventors. BREATH S ANDA FOR BUDESONIDE INHALATION SUSPENSION, 0.25 AND 0.5 mg/2 ml 10. Upon information and belief, Breath submitted Abbreviated New Drug Application ( ANDA No. 78-404 to the FDA, under 505(j of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j, in order to obtain approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of budesonide inhalation suspension, 0.25 mg/2ml and 0.5 mg/2 ml, a generic version of PULMICORT RESPULES, before the expiration of the 834 patent. 3

Case 1:09-cv-04115-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 4 11. Upon information and belief, subject to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b(3, defendant s budesonide inhalation suspension, 0.25 mg/2ml and 0.5 mg/2 ml together with its package insert, and its use are the subject of one or more claims of the 834 patent. 12. Upon information and belief, subject to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b(3, Breath s ANDA No. 78-404 contains information to show that budesonide inhalation suspension, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/2 ml, (a is bioequivalent to PULMICORT RESPULES, (b has the same active ingredient as PULMICORT RESPULES, (c has the same route of administration, dosage form, and strength as PULMICORT RESPULES, and (d has the same, or substantially the same, proposed labeling as PULMICORT RESPULES. 13. In a letter dated July 28, 2009 addressed to AstraZeneca LP and AstraZeneca AB, Breath sent a Notification of Certification for U.S. Patent No. 7,524,834 B2 Pursuant to 505(j(2(B(iv of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ( the ANDA Notice. The ANDA Notice does not provide any valid basis for concluding that the 834 patent is invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed. AstraZeneca received the ANDA Notice on July 29, 2009. 14. Upon information and belief, subject to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b(3, Breath s submission of ANDA No. 78-404 was an act of infringement of one or more claims of the 834 patent, under the United States Patent Law, 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2(A. 15. Upon information and belief, subject to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b(3, defendant s manufacture, use, sale, and/or offer for sale of budesonide inhalation suspension, 0.25 mg/2ml and 0.5 mg/2 ml, will infringe, contribute to the infringement of, and/or induce the infringement of one or more claims of the 834 patent. 16. Upon information and belief, defendant has been aware of the existence of the 834 patent, but nevertheless has been and is now infringing one or more claims of the 834 4

Case 1:09-cv-04115-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 5 patent. This infringement by the defendant has been deliberate and in disregard of AstraZeneca s lawful rights under the 834 patent, thus rendering this case exceptional, as that term is set forth in 35 U.S.C. 285. 17. The acts of infringement by the defendant set forth above will cause AstraZeneca irreparable harm for which it has no adequate remedy at law, including irreparable harm within the state of New Jersey and this Judicial District, and will continue unless preliminarily and permanently enjoined by this Court. RELIEF WHEREFORE, AstraZeneca prays for judgment against the defendant as follows: A. Adjudging that the 834 patent is valid and enforceable; B. Adjudging that the defendant has infringed the 834 patent, and that the sale, offer for sale, and/or manufacture by the defendant of budesonide inhalation suspension, 0.25 mg/2ml and 0.5 mg/2 ml, if marketed, will infringe, induce infringement of, and/or contribute to infringement of the 834 patent; C. Adjudging, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4(A, the effective date of any approval of Breath s ANDA No. 78-404, under 505(j of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j, to be a date which is not earlier than the last date of expiration of the 834 patent; D. Preliminarily and permanently enjoining, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4(B and 283 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, the defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, parents, subsidiaries, affiliate corporations, other related business entities and all other persons acting in concert, participation, or in privity with them, and their successors or assigns, from any commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell or sale within the United States, or importation into the United States, of any drug product or its use that infringes the 834 patent; 5

Case 1:09-cv-04115-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 6 E. Declaring this an exceptional case and awarding AstraZeneca its attorney fees, as provided by 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4 and 285; and F. Awarding AstraZeneca such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully submitted, DATED: August 12, 2009 Of Counsel By s/john E. Flaherty John E. Flaherty Jonathan M.H. Short McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Four Gateway Center 100 Mulberry Street Newark, New Jersey 07102-4096 (973 622-4444 (telephone (973 624-7070 (facsimile Attorneys for Plaintiffs AstraZeneca LP and AstraZeneca AB Denise L. Loring Christopher J. Harnett Pablo D. Hendler Derek M. Kato ROPES & GRAY LLP 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 (212 596-9000 (telephone (212 596-9090 (facsimile 6