FDA acts on cancer drug shortages

Similar documents
Colorectal Cancer Screening

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

2017 CANCER ANNUAL REPORT

Clinical indications for positron emission tomography

Screening tests. When you need them and when you don t

Trends in Cancer Survival in NSW 1980 to 1996

Molecular Imaging and Cancer

Oncology 101. Cancer Basics

Transforming Cancer Services for London

Wellness Along the Cancer Journey: Healthy Habits and Cancer Screening Revised October 2015 Chapter 7: Cancer Screening and Early Detection of Cancer

Cancer Screenings and Early Diagnostics

Page 1. Selected Controversies. Cancer Screening! Selected Controversies. Breast Cancer Screening. ! Using Best Evidence to Guide Practice!

Faster Cancer Treatment Indicators: Use cases

Colon Cancer Screening. Layth Al-Jashaami, MD GI Fellow, PGY 4

number Done by Corrected by Doctor مها شوماف

Balancing Evidence and Clinical Practice in the Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Cancer in Halton. Halton Region Cancer Incidence and Mortality Report

Managing Older Patients With Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma

Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland

CANCER SCREENING. Er Chaozer Department of General Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Colorectal Cancer Screening. Paul Berg MD

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

Epidemiology in Texas 2006 Annual Report. Cancer

Index. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 16 (2007) Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Guideline Issue Brief Updated May 30 th, 2018

Navigators Lead the Way

Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland

Menopause and Cancer risk; What to do overcome the risks? Fatih DURMUŞOĞLU,M.D

Bowel cancer screening and prevention

They know how to prevent colon cancer

PET IMAGING (POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPY) FACT SHEET

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun Medical College in Bydgoszcz Family Doctor Department CANCER PREVENTION IN GENERAL PRACTICE

2016 Oncology Institute Annual Report

Action to Cure Kidney Cancer Campaign to Fund Kidney Cancer Research

Competent Pain Management for Older Patients With Cancer

Objectives. Definitions. Colorectal Cancer Screening 5/8/2018. Payam Afshar, MS, MD Kaiser Permanente, San Diego. Colorectal cancer background

Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer

Guidelines for Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening

Cancer prevalence. Chapter 7

Bowel Cancer Information Leaflet THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM

PDF // POSITIVE COLON CANCER RESULTS

SU2C TOP SCIENCE ACCOMPLISHMENTS

F NaF PET/CT in the Evaluation of Skeletal Malignancy

THE BURDEN OF CANCER IN NEBRASKA: RECENT INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY DATA

Cologuard Screening for Colorectal Cancer

Screening & Surveillance Guidelines

Comprehensive cancer cover

Cancer Prevention & Control in Adolescent & Young Adult Survivors

Re: Comments on Proposed Decision Memorandum (CAG-00065R2) Positron Emission Tomography (NaF-18) to Identify Bone Metastasis of Cancer

Cancer A Superficial Introduction

SCOTTISH CANCER REFERRAL GUIDELINES REVIEW 2018

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

This is the portion of the intestine which lies between the small intestine and the outlet (Anus).

performed to help sway the clinician in what the appropriate diagnosis is, which can substantially alter the treatment of management.

Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM)

Scientist Survivor Program at the AACR Annual Meeting New Applicant Application

Joint Session with ACOFP and Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA): Cancer Screening: Consensus & Controversies. Ashish Sangal, M.D.

Comprehensive cancer cover

BOWEL CANCER. Cancer information.

Avastin Sample Coding

Alabama Cancer Facts & Figures 2009

Cancer Facts for Women

Cancer , The Patient Education Institute, Inc. ocf80101 Last reviewed: 06/08/2016 1

GI CANCER SCREENING- Is It Worth It? Sylvia M. Oats, MSN, APRN, ANP-BC Susan H. Miedecke, MSN, APRN, FNP-BC Gastroenterology Clinic of Acadiana

Cancer Screening 2009: New Tests, New Choices

Shared Care Pathway for Soft Tissue Sarcomas Presenting to Site Specialised MDTs. Gynaecological sarcomas Version 1

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment Workflow. Documentation Guide for Health Center NextGen Users

Colon Cancer Screening and Surveillance. Louis V. Antignano, M.D. Wilson Gastroenterology October 11, 2011

What is CT Colonography?

Monitoring Patients Undergoing Cancer Therapy. By Timothy K. Egan

37 th ANNUAL JP MORGAN HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

CANCER Hafsa Raheel, MD, FCPS (Com med), MCPS (Fam med)

THE MODERN GYNECOLOGIC EXAMINATION & SCREENING FOR GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES

Cancer Screening I have no conflicts of interest. Principles of screening. Cancer in the World Page 1. Letting Evidence Be Our Guide

Information for You and Your Family

Cancer in zimbabwe 2014 report

Selected Controversies. Cancer Screening. Breast Cancer Screening. Selected Controversies. Page 1. Using Best Evidence to Guide Practice

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) Protocol

Evaluation of Ancestry Information Markers (AIMs) from Previous ACOSOG/CALGB/NCCTG Trials

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE

Get tested for. Colorectal cancer. Doctors know how to prevent colon or rectal cancer- and you can, too. Take a look inside.

UK Bowel Cancer screening Dr Voi Shim Wong BsC MD FRCP. Consultant Gastroenterologist Accredited BCSP colonoscopist Whittington + UCL Hospitals

Applicant Information.

Chapter III: Summary of Data for Specific Cancers

COLON AND RECTAL CANCER

LANDMARK MEDICAL CENTER CANCER PROGRAM YEAR IN REVIEW 2013

Annual Report. Cape Cod Hospital and Falmouth Hospital Regional Cancer Network Expert physicians. Quality hospitals. Superior care.

Colorectal cancer screening

BOWEL CANCER. Causes of bowel cancer

POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET)

Colorectal Cancer Screening. Dr Kishor Muniyappa 2626 Care Drive, Suite 101 Tallahassee, FL Ph:

UK Biobank. Death and Cancer Outcomes Report. September

Common Questions about Cancer

Rectal Cancer. About the Colon and Rectum. Symptoms. Colorectal Cancer Screening

A: PARTICIPANT INFORMATION

Transcription:

FDA acts on cancer drug shortages Partially in response to recent shortages of such critically needed cancer drugs as doxorubicin hydrochloride liposomal injection (Doxil) and methotrexate, the FDA has issued draft guidance on detailed requirements for both mandatory and voluntary notifications to the agency of issues that could result in a drug shortage or supply disruption of a prescription drug or biological product. On October 31, 2011, the FDA sent a letter to manufacturers to raise awareness of the importance of early notification of drug shortages or supply disruptions. According to the agency, the annual number of such shortages tripled from 61 in 2005 to 178 in 2010. Of particular concern were medications that are manufactured by a small number of firms and for which no good substitutes exist. To address the recent Doxil shortage, the FDA approved temporary importation of another doxorubicin hydrochloride liposomal injection. The agency handled the methotrexate shortage in part by expediting review of the application for a preservative-free formulation of the agent. Under current regulations, the sole manufacturer of a drug that is deemed life-supporting, lifesustaining, or intended for use in the prevention of a debilitating disease or condition is required to notify the FDA at least 6 months prior to discontinuing manufacture of the product in question. However, in 2010, only 8% of drug shortages were attributable to permanent discontinuances of the product: The majority of shortages resulted from problems at the manufacturing facility, delays in manufacturing or shipping, and shortages in active pharmaceutical ingredients. In addition, some biological products are vulnerable to shortages but are not subject to mandatory reporting. Under current law manufacturers are not required to report to the FDA the majority of situations that could lead to a drug shortage, and the agency has begun strongly encouraging companies to voluntarily report any issues that could lead to a shortage of any prescription drug Temporary importation of another doxorubicin hydrochloride liposomal injection and expediting review of a preservativefree methotrexate were actions taken to alleviate recent shortages. FDA has begun strongly encouraging companies to voluntarily report issues that could lead to a shortage of any prescription drug or biological product. or biological product supplied in the United States. Approximately 4 months after sending the awareness-raising letter to manufacturers, the FDA registered a sixfold increase in voluntary notification by industry of potential shortages, and distributed a draft guidance for industry on requirements for notifying the agency of a discontinuation of certain drug products (Notification to FDA of Issues that May Result in a Prescription Drug or Biological Product Shortage). Whereas all permanent discontinuances of production must continue to be reported to the FDA, the agency is now also asking for even temporary interruptions to be reported if the interruption can reasonably be expected to lead to a disruption in supply of the product. In the draft guidance, the FDA urges manufacturers to be over-inclusive when determining whether the product is lifesupporting, life-sustaining, or is used for a debilitating disease or condition, and to be similarly liberal when determining whether they are a sole manufacturer. But the agency is encouraging notification even when companies are not the sole manufacturer of a drug or biological product, and is encouraging voluntary notification for all prescription drug and biological products. Comments and suggestions regarding this draft document should be submitted to the FDA by May 29, 2012. (Submission information is included in the document.) istockphoto.com / Malgorzata Biernikiewicz www.oncologynurseadvisor.com march/april 2012 oncology nurse advisor 9

Virtual colonoscopy is an accurate screen in seniors Computerized tomographic (CT) colonography, also known as virtual colonoscopy, accurately detects cancer and precancerous polyps in persons aged 65 years and older, indicate the results of a secondary analysis involving participants from the National CT Colonography Trial. In 2008, C. Daniel Johnson, MD, MMM, of Mayo Clinic Arizona in Scottsdale, and colleagues recruited 2,600 asymptomatic persons aged 50 years and older, who were at average risk for colorectal cancer, to compare noninvasive CT colonography with colonoscopy in detecting the disease. Screening CT colonography identified adenomas or cancer measuring at least 10 mm in diameter in 90% of participants (N Engl J Med. 2008;359[12]:1207-1217). More recently, Johnson s team compared the sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography in participants of the earlier trial who were younger and older than 65 years. The difference between senioraged participants and those younger than 65 years was not statistically significant for most measures. Of 2,531 evaluable enrollees from the original study, complete data were available for 477 participants aged 65 years and older. A total of 33 (6.9%) of these patients had adenomas of 1 cm or 3D virtual colonoscopy showing polyposis of the colon. larger, compared with 76 (3.7%) of the 2,054 younger patients. For large neoplasms, mean estimates for CT colonography sensitivity and specificity for the older group were 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for large neoplasms among the younger participants were 0.92 and 0.86, respectively. ISM / Phototake ACP issues new colorectal screening guidance Average-risk adults should be screened for colorectal cancer starting at age 50 years, and high-risk adults at age 40 years or 10 years younger than the age at diagnosis of the youngest affected relative, according to a new guidance statement from the American College of Physicians (ACP) (Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:378-386. The new document calls for clinicians to perform individualized risk assessments for colorectal cancer in all adults. Risk factors include increasing age; race (African Americans have the highest incidence and mortality rates for colorectal cancer in the United States); personal history of polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, or The new document calls for individualized risk assessments for colorectal cancer in all adults. colorectal cancer; and family history of colorectal cancer. Once a patient is assessed, the clinician should follow the abovestated age guidelines for screening initiation. The ACP also advises discontinuing screening in adults older than 75 years and in adults with a life expectancy of less than 10 years. Average-risk patients should be screened for colorectal cancer using a stool-based test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or optical colonoscopy, and high-risk patients should undergo optical colonoscopy. However, counsels the ACP, tests should be selected based on the benefits and harms as well as availability, and also should be based on patient preferences. When choosing a stool-based test, clinicians may not want to use fecal DNA tests based on a recent white paper issued by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). After conducting a review, the agency determined that insufficient evidence exists to support using fecal DNA tests to screen adults at average risk of colorectal cancer. AHRQ calls for further research on the effectiveness of fecal DNA testing compared with other stoolbased screening tests (AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC022-EF, www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq. gov/ehc/products/282/971/ CER52_Fecal-DNA-Testing_ FinalReport_20120229.pdf). 10 oncology nurse advisor march/april 2012 www.oncologynurseadvisor.com

Cancer hospitalizations rated The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) released Statistical Brief #125 Cancer Hospitalizations for Adults, 2009. The brief presented data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample on hospital stays for cancer care among adults age 18 years and older in 2009 (Table 1). Cancer was the principal diagnosis in one-quarter of the 4.7 million cancer-related hospitalizations among US adults in 2009. Adult hospital stays principally for cancer account for approximately 6% of adult inpatient hospital costs. This number decreased by 4% between 2000 and 2009. The growing number of outpatient cancer treatment options may account for some of the decrease in the number of hospitalizations. The most common hospitalizations for cancer among adult men Adult hospital stays principally for cancer account for about 6% of adult inpatient hospital costs. were for prostate cancer, secondary malignancies (such as metastatic disease), and lung cancer. Data in this report indicated hospitalizations for kidney cancer increased 40% between 2000 and 2009, whereas hospitalizations for colon cancer and bladder cancer decreased 14% and 12%, respectively, during the same time period. The most common cancer hospitalizations among adult women were for secondary malignancies, breast cancer, and lung cancer. Hospitalizations for lung cancer, uterine cancer, and ovarian cancer remained relatively stable from 2000 to 2009. Hospitalizations for all other common cancers decreased; most notably, the data show a decrease of 28% and 26% in hospitalizations for breast cancer and cervical cancer, respectively. For the full report, go to http:// www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/ statbriefs/sb125.jsp. TABLE 1. Top 10 most frequent cancer hospitalizations for adults, in 2009 a Type of cancer Men Number of stays (thousands) Type of cancer Women Number of stays (thousands) Prostate 97 Secondary malignancies 120 Secondary malignancies 97 Breast 87 Bronchus, lung 79 Bronchus, lung 71 Colon 48 Colon 51 Kidney and renal pelvis 28 Uterine 40 Bladder 28 Ovarian 26 Rectum and anus 25 Cervical 22 Head and neck 24 Rectum and anus 19 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 23 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 18 Leukemias 22 Pancreatic 18 a Data include hospital stays with a principal diagnosis of cancer. Source: Anhang Price R, Stranges E, Elixhauser A. Cancer Hospitalizations for Adults, 2009. HCUP Statistical Brief #125. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. On-site lab reduces repeat surgeries A new service at the University of Michigan (U-M) Comprehensive Cancer Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, has helped reduce the number of women who need additional surgery after an initial resection for breast cancer. U-M s intraoperative pathology consultation service puts pathologists in the surgical suite to assess tumors and lymph nodes immediately after removal. The surgeon and patient remain in the operating room until the results come back, and any additional surgery can be performed immediately. A team led by Michael S. Sabel, MD, reported in The American Journal of Surgery that among 271 patients evaluated in the 8 months before the facility established the intraoperative pathology consultation service, the average number of surgeries per breast cancer patient was 1.5. Eight months after the service was initiated, that average fell to 1.23 among 278 patients. The number of patients requiring one surgery increased from 59% in the 8 months prior to implementation of the service to 80% 8 months after, and reexcisions were reduced from 26% to 9%. Frozen section allowed 93% of node-positive patients to avoid a second surgery for axillary lymph node dissection. Cost analysis indicated a savings of $400 to $600 per breast cancer patient, even when accounting for fewer axillary lymph node dissections. www.oncologynurseadvisor.com march/april 2012 oncology nurse advisor 11

Monkey Business Images / shutterstock.com A second gene may predispose women to breast cancer SCIENTISTS have discovered yet another gene that may advance the mission of BRCA1, and even act on its own to help breast cancer develop. The Abraxas gene has become a candidate for yet unexplained susceptibility to breast cancer. Recent research has shown it to directly interact with BRCA1 and contribute to the DNA damage associated with BRCA1. In the study, 125 breast cancer families were screened for Abraxas mutations. One such mutation, R361Q, was found in breast cancer patients from three of the families, but not in any of the more than 800 healthy controls included in the analysis. The researchers demonstrated that R361Q blocks BRCA1 and other proteins from effectively repairing damaged DNA in cells. The mutated Abraxas gene appears to increase susceptibility to breast cancer, even in the absence of BRCA mutations. The Abraxas mutation may also predispose people to other cancers. On the basis of its exclusive occurrence in familial cancers, its disruption of critical BRCA1 functions, and other factors, the authors conclude that Abraxas mutations connect to cancer predisposition (Sci Transl Med. 4[122]:122ra23). Women with Abraxas mutations potentially could have chemotherapy or radiation treatment specifically designed to target DNA repair deficits in those mutated cells. Diagnosis delayed for certain cancers and certain patients A large study conducted in the United Kingdom uncovered a wide variation between cancer types in the proportion of patients who had visited their general practitioner (GP) 3 times or more before being referred to the hospital for cancer diagnosis. The data also revealed that women, young people, and nonwhites are less likely to be referred before completing at least three visits with their family doctors. The analysis focused on 41,299 patients (representing 24 different cancers) participating in the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England. Half the patients who eventually received a diagnosis of multiple myeloma (939 of 1,854 [50.6%]) had three or more visits with their GPs before receiving a referral. Many persons in whom pancreatic cancer was eventually diagnosed also had three or more visits to their primary care provider before being referred to the hospital for diagnosis (193 of 467 [41.3%]). In contrast, only 7.4% (625 of 8,408) of patients with breast cancer and 10.1% (113 of 1,124) of those with melanoma made three or more prereferral visits to the GP. $40,200 Leukemia Patients aged 16 to 24 years were more than twice as likely as those aged 65 to 74 years to have three or more prereferral visits. $28,700 Multiple myeloma Georgios Lyratzopoulos from Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and coinvestigators also reported in The Lancet Oncology that study participants with a subsequent diagnosis of stomach cancer or lung cancer were among those more likely to have made three or more prereferral visits, whereas men with testicular cancer or women with endometrial cancer were more likely to have been referred to the hospital for diagnosis after only one or two consultations with a GP. Patients aged 16 to 24 years were found to be more than twice as likely as those aged 65 to 74 years to have three or more prereferral GP visits. The only cancers without an apparent age gradient were testicular cancer and mesothelioma. Women were less likely than men to be referred quickly for diagnosis, particularly when bladder cancer was the diagnosis. Asians and blacks were less likely than whites to be sent to the hospital after just one or two visits with the GP. These findings may help health care professionals prioritize earlydiagnosis initiatives based on particular cancers and sociodemographic patient characteristics. Most expensive cancer hospital stays $24,900 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Source: Statistical Brief #125. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; February 2012. 12 oncology nurse advisor march/april 2012 www.oncologynurseadvisor.com

NCHS DATA brief reports... Cancer and heart disease cause fewer deaths, but still among top causes A 75-year perspective from the CDC National Center for Health Statistics shows heart disease and cancer remained among the five leading causes of death between 1935 and 2010. However, the proportion of deaths caused by these two conditions decreased. In 1983, they accounted for 60% of all deaths; in 2010, they constituted 47% of all deaths. Heart disease and cancer remained the 1st and 2nd leading causes of death, respectively, over the 75-year period. Source: Hoyert DL. 75 years of mortality in the United States, 1935-2010. NCHS data brief, no. 88. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db88.pdf. Accessed March 18, 2012. PET/CT changes brain tumor treatment plans Science Source / photo researchers, Inc. Adding findings from positron emission tomography (PET)/ computed tomography (CT) imaging, using the radiopharmaceutical 18 F-DOPA, to other diagnostic data prompted physicians to change their original management recommendations for almost half of patients with known or suspected brain tumors. These results suggest that imaging amino acid transporters such as 18 F-DOPA (3,4-dihydroxy- 6-F-18-fluoro-L-phenylalanine) have a potentially important role in the management of persons with brain tumors. In the study, published in The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (2012;53[3]:393-398), referring physicians were asked to complete a pre-pet/ct survey relating to 58 consecutive patients with known or suspected brain tumors. The survey posed questions about indication, tumor histology or grade, level of suspicion for tumor recurrence, and planned management. After obtaining PET/CT imaging studies, the physicians completed a second questionnaire as to whether the imaging findings should be categorized as negative, equivocal, or positive. The participants were also asked to report their level of suspicion for primary or recurrent brain tumors and intended management changes prompted by findings on Malignant brain tumor (red) seen on PET scan the scan. A third questionnaire, completed 6 months after PET/ CT, was designed to determine patient outcome (recurrence and survival). Of the 58 cases included in the study, clinical suspicion for recurrence increased in 33%, remained unchanged in 50%, and decreased in 17% after the PET/CT result was added to the available diagnostic data. A total of 26 patients experienced recurrence; the remaining 32 had stable disease or remained disease-free. Intended treatment changes were precipitated by 18 F-DOPA PET/CT findings for 41% of the patients. The most frequent changes were from wait-and-watch to chemotherapy (six patients [25%]), and from chemotherapy to waitand-watch (four patients [17%]). Additional follow-up revealed that 75% of the intended treatment changes were implemented. www.oncologynurseadvisor.com march/april 2012 oncology nurse advisor 13