Predictors, incidence and outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation complicated by stroke

Similar documents
TAVR-Update Andrzej Boguszewski MD, FACC, FSCAI Vice Chairman, Cardiology Mid-Michigan Health Associate Professor Michigan State University, Central

TAVI in Rabin Medical Center -

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

The Role of TAVI in high-risk and normal-risk Patients

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. SSVQ November 23, 2012 Centre Mont-Royal 15:40

Strokes After TAVR. Ioannis Iakovou, MD, PhD. Interventional Cardiology Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center

Aortic Stenosis: Background

Incorporating the intermediate risk in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Embolic Protection Devices for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

3 years after introduction of TAVI in QEH. Michael KY Lee On Behalf of QEH TAVI Heart Team Queen Elizabeth Hospital Hong Kong

How to Prevent Thromboembolic Complications in TAVI

Is TAVR the treatment of choice for high risk diabetic patients with aortic stenosis? Insights from the FRANCE2 Registry

Aortic valve implantation using the femoral and apical access: a single center experience.

Outcomes in the Commercial Use of Self-expanding Prostheses in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison of the Medtronic CoreValve and

Sentinel Dual Filter Device: Technology Overview and Status of the CLEAN-TAVI Randomized Trial. Martin B. Leon, MD

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients:

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

TAVR in Intermediate Risk Populations /Optimizing Systems for TAVR

Role of Embolic Protection Devices in TAVR: Are They Needed? Waste of Time and Money?

Le TAVI pour tout le monde?

Post-TAVI Cerebral Embolisms and Potential Protection Means

Appropriate Use of TAVR - now and in the future. A Surgeon s Perspective. Neil Moat Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK

1-YEAR OUTCOMES FROM JOHN WEBB, MD

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

VARC-2 and MVRC definitions Ioannis Iakovou, MD, PhD

Aortic Stenosis: Open vs TAVR vs Nothing

SOLVE-TAV. Holger Thiele, MD on behalf of the SOLVE-TAVI Investigators

Adverse outcomes following percutaneous transcatheter interventions Hassell, M.E.C.J.

David Dexter MD FACS Sentara Vascular Specialists Assistant Professor of Surgery EVMS. Peripheral Complications of TAVR

Strokes After TAVR Reasons for Declining Frequency

30-day Outcomes of The CENTERA Trial a New Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve. Didier Tchétché, MD On Behalf of the CENTERA Investigators

Igor Palacios, MD Director of Interventional Cardiology Massachusetts General Hospital Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School

Is Stroke Frequency Declining?

TAVI After PARTNER-2 : The Hamilton Approach

An Update on the Edwards TAVR Results. Zvonimir Krajcer, MD Director, Peripheral Intervention Texas Heart Institute at St.

TAVR today: High Risk, Intermediate Risk Population, and Valve in Valve Therapy

Trend and Outcomes of Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement from a Single-Center Experience

procedures for severe Aortic stenosis Treatment

Treatment of Bio-Prosthetic Valve Deterioration Using Transcatheter Techniques

Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD, on behalf of the ARTE investigators

Cerebral Protection In Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement The SENTINEL Study. Susheel Kodali, MD Columbia University Medical Center

Peri-operative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve implantations from the German Aortic valve RegistrY (GARY)

After PARTNER 2A/S3i and SURTAVI: What is the Role of Surgery in Intermediate-Risk AS Patients?

Is TAVI ready for prime time in: - Intermediate risk patients? - Low risk patients?

2/15/2018 DISCLOSURES OBJECTIVES. Consultant for BioSense Webster, a J&J Co. Aortic stenosis background. Short history of TAVR

Indication, Timing, Assessment and Update on TAVI

TAVI limitations for low risk patients

TAVI in Korea, How to Avoid Conduction

e Corrado Tamburino, MD, PhD

CIPG Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement- When Is Less, More?

Establishing a New Path Forward for Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis THE PARTNER TRIAL CLINICAL RESULTS

Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy: Current Landscape for Patients Post TAVR

Cerebral Embolic Protection In Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR)

The Silent and Apparent Neurological Injury in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Study (SANITY)

Strokes After TAVR. Incidence (past and present) Multi-factorial Origin

RANDOMISED TRIALS TAVI WITH SAVR STEPHAN WINDECKER AORTIC VALVE DISEASE COMPARING

Dr.ssa Loredana Iannetta. Centro Cardiologico Monzino

Maurizio D Amico M.D.

Multicentre clinical study evaluating a novel resheatable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve system

Evolving and Expanding Indications for TAVR

For the SURTAVI Investigators

LOW RISK TAVR. WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

TAVR: Intermediate Risk Patients

TAVI- Is Stroke Risk the Achilles Heel of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Repair?

Neuroprotection During TAVR

Successful Transfemoral Edwards Sapien Aortic. Valve Implantation in a Patient with Previous. Mitral Valve Replacement

30-Day Outcomes Following Implantation of a Repositionable Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis: First Report From the FORWARD Study

The Sentinel Dual Filter Device Design Features & EU Clinical Trial Results

I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Other(s): Proctor for Medtronic for TAVI cases using the CoreValve/Evolut R devices

Supplementary Online Content

Antithrombotic. DAPT or OAC?

The Impact of TAVI Nurse Coordinator on patient management of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) program in QEH

The FORMA Early Feasibility Study: 30-Day Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapy in Patients with Severe Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

Neal Kleiman, MD Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Institute

Australia and New Zealand Source Registry Edwards Sapien Aortic Valve 30 day Outcomes

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Pacemaker rates Second generation TAVI Devices

Subclinical Thrombosis of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Is It Clinically Relevant? Tarun Chakravarty, MD

Vinod H. Thourani, MD, FACC, FACS

TAVI: The Real Deal? Marc Pelletier, MD Head, Department of Cardiac Surgery New Brunswick Heart Centre

Cerebral protection devices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a clinical meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) - 5 important lessons learnt from HK experiences Michael KY Lee

When Should We Consider TAVI. (Surgeon s Viewpoint)? Pyowon Park Samsung Medical Center Seoul, Korea

stenosis (AS) at our center between June 2007 and December 2010, with last follow-up contact in 2016.

TAVR IN INTERMEDIATE-RISK PATIENTS

TAVI: Transapical Procedures

TAVR for Complex Aortic Valvular Conditions

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Results of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

The Future of Medicine. Who to TAVR? Azeem Latib MD EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy

Debate: SAVR for Low-Risk Patients in 2017 is Obsolete AVR vs TAVI

TAVR: Review of the Robust Data from Randomized Trials

TAVR 2018: TAVR has high clinical efficacy according to baseline patient risk! ii. Con

PARTNER 2A & SAPIEN 3: TAVI for intermediate risk patients

Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis

Femoral artery anatomy-tailored approach in transcatheter aortic valve implantation

CoreValve in a Degenerative Surgical Valve

Alec Vahanian,FESC, FRCP (Edin.) Bichat Hospital University Paris VII, Paris, France

Valve Disease in Patients With Heart Failure TAVI or Surgery? Miguel Sousa Uva Hospital Cruz Vermelha Lisbon, Portugal

The Case for and Against Cerebral Embolic Protection During TAVR. Susheel Kodali, MD

Transcription:

Predictors, incidence and outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation complicated by stroke From the CENTER-Collaboration Wieneke Vlastra, MD Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands On behalf of the CENTER-collaborators

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest I, Wieneke Vlastra DO NOT have a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this presentation.

Background TAVI TAVI is a life-saving and minimally invasive treatment in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis The TAVI population has rapidly expanded from inoperable to intermediate-risk patients Stroke remains one of the most detrimental complications of TAVI Stroke in TAVI patients increases mortality but also decreases the patient s quality of life

Background Pathophysiology of stroke during TAVI Vlastra et al, J Thorac Dis 2017

Background Debris captured in cerebral protection devices Kapadia et al, JACC 2017

Background Debris captured in cerebral protection devices Kapadia et al, JACC 2017

Background Debris captured in cerebral protection devices Kapadia et al, JACC 2017

Background Debris captured in cerebral protection devices Kapadia et al, JACC 2017

Background Cerebral infarctions after TAVI Cerebral diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) 78% of patients (95% CI 72-83%) have new ischemic lesions after the TAVI procedure Pagnesi et al, Int J Cardiol, 2016 Hassell et al, Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2013

Incidence of stroke Background TAVI and stroke Reported rates vary from 1.3% to 21.0% despite development of the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) criteria to promote uniformity Limited data assessing patients at risk and determining clinical outcomes in patients with stroke Data from large-scale, patient-level, real-world studies is needed Généreux et al, JACC 2012

Determine the incidence and timeframe of 30-day stroke in TAVI patients Identify predictors of stroke Study Aim CENTER-Collaboration Assess the impact of stroke on mortality and other clinical outcomes In a large-scale, real-world & international patient population

CENTER-Collaboration Study selection Inclusion criteria for studies: including patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI with either Edwards SAPIEN valves or Medtronic CoreValves and reporting 30 day stroke outcomes

Study selection Screening of title and abstract Screening in full PI s approached for participation in collaborative analysis. 903 potentially eligible individual studies on patients undergoing TAVI and stroke were identified. 77 studies included the intended study population 28 studies eligible for inclusion in the CENTER-trial 10 studies included in the current collaboration No Original data N=359 Less than 50 patients treated with ESV and/or MCV N=385 No primary procedures performed N=73 Only bicuspid valves treated N=2 No transfemoral TAVI performed N=7 30-day stroke was not reported N=36 Stroke was not defined according to VARC or equivalent definitions N = 10 Overlapping patient populations N= 3 No participation in collaboration N=18

Study selection Screening of title and abstract Screening in full PI s approached for participation in collaborative analysis. 903 potentially eligible individual studies on patients undergoing TAVI and stroke were identified. 77 studies included the intended study population 28 studies eligible for inclusion in the CENTER-trial 10 studies included in the current collaboration No Original data N=359 Less than 50 patients treated with ESV and/or MCV N=385 No primary procedures performed N=73 Only bicuspid valves treated N=2 No transfemoral TAVI performed N=7 30-day stroke was not reported N=36 Stroke was not defined according to VARC or equivalent definitions N = 10 Overlapping patient populations N= 3 No participation in collaboration N=18

Study selection Screening of title and abstract Screening in full PI s approached for participation in collaborative analysis. 903 potentially eligible individual studies on patients undergoing TAVI and stroke were identified. 77 studies included the intended study population 28 studies eligible for inclusion in the CENTER-trial 10 studies included in the current collaboration No Original data N=359 Less than 50 patients treated with ESV and/or MCV N=385 No primary procedures performed N=73 Only bicuspid valves treated N=2 No transfemoral TAVI performed N=7 30-day stroke was not reported N=36 Stroke was not defined according to VARC or equivalent definitions N = 10 Overlapping patient populations N= 3 No participation in collaboration N=18

CENTER-Collaboration Included patient populations (2007-2018) Study Study design (n = 12,381) Brazil National registry 768 France-2 National registry 2,347 Milano Single-centre registry 515 Verona Single-centre registry 346 OBSERVANT Multi-centre registry 577 Rabin Single-centre registry (subset from multi-centre study) 544 Padova Single-centre registry 447 Spain National registry 5,320 BRAVO-3 Randomized controlled trial 732 WIN-TAVI Multi-centre registry 785

Primary endpoint Primary and secondary endpoints CENTER-Collaboration Incidence and timeframe of 30-day stroke according to the VARC criteria Secondary endpoints Predictors of stroke Clinical outcomes in patients with stroke

Baseline Patient Demographics CENTER-Population (N=12,381) Demographics Age (years) Female gender Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) Risk scores (%) Logistic EuroSCORE EuroSCORE II STS-PROM Echocardiographic characteristics Aortic max gradient (mmhg) Mean gradient (mmhg) Aortic valve area (cm 2 ) 81.6 ± 6.8 7,109 (58%) 27.1 ± 5.1 14.4 (9.0-23.0) 4.0 (2.4-6.9) 6.4 (4.0-13.0) 79 ± 23 49 ± 16 0.7 ± 0.2 Medical history Previous CVA or TIA Previous ACS Previous PCI Previous CABG Diabetes mellitus Hypertension Dyslipidemia Peripheral vascular disease Coronary artery disease Atrial fibrillation GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m 2 Valve-types Edwards SAPIEN valve Medtronic CoreValve 1,246 (10%) 1,599 (14%) 1,946 (22%) 1,375 (12%) 3,550 (31%) 8,603 (79%) 5,526 (55%) 1,698 (15%) 4,493 (43%) 3,029 (27%) 1,136 (13%) 6,239 (50%) 6,142 (50%)

Stroke after TAVI Incidence and timeframe The 30-day incidence of stroke was 2.4%

Stroke after TAVI Incidence and timeframe The 30-day incidence of stroke was 2.4% The incidence of stroke was equal in the early years and late years of TAVI (p = 1.0) 2007-2012: 2.4% 2013-2018: 2.4% 3.5 3.5 3 2.5 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0 3.1% 2.8% 2.6% 2.4% 2.1% 1.9% 2.0% 1.9% 1.4% 0% 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Stroke incidence over the years 2.0% 0%

Timing of Stroke after TAVI

Study Aim Timing of stroke after TAVI Median time between TAVI and stroke was 1 day (IQR 0-6 days)

Study Aim Timing of stroke after TAVI 80% Median time between TAVI and stroke was 1 day (IQR 0-6 days) 80% occurred within the first week

Cerebrovascular events after TAVI Stroke was defined as major stroke in 75% The incidence of TIA at 30 days was 0.6% The cumulative stroke rate increased from 2.4% at 30 days to 5% at 1 year

Stroke after TAVI Predictors Predictors of 30-day stroke in multivariate regression analysis Previous cerebrovascular events OR 2.1 (95%CI 1.4-3.3) p=0.001 GFR of less than 30 ml/min/1.73m2 OR 1.6 (95% CI 1.0-2.5) p=0.03 No stroke at 30 days (n = 10,721) Stroke at 30 days (n = 261) p-value Previous CVA or TIA 1057 (10%) 43 (17%) <0.001 GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m 2 1013 (13%) 33 (19%) 0.03

30-day clinical outcomes (%) In patients with and without stroke

30-day clinical outcomes (%) In patients with and without stroke Six-fold increase in mortality OR 6.0, 95% CI 4.4-8.1, p<0.001

30-day clinical outcomes (%) In patients with and without stroke Six-fold increase in mortality OR 6.0, 95% CI 4.4-8.1, p<0.001 Two-fold increase in major or lifethreatening bleeding OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-3.0, p=0.003

30-day clinical outcomes (%) In patients with and without stroke Six-fold increase in mortality OR 6.0, 95% CI 4.4-8.1, p<0.001 Two-fold increase in major or lifethreatening bleeding OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-3.0, p=0.003 Five-fold more frequent new-onset atrial fibrillation OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.9-14.1, p=0.001

Conclusions CENTER-Collaboration The 30-day incidence of stroke after TAVI was 2.4%, this was consistent over time 80% of the strokes occurred during the first week after TAVI Patients with prior cerebrovascular events or a low GFR were at higher risk for stroke There was a strong association between new-onset atrial fibrillation and stroke Stroke was associated with a six-fold increase of 30-day mortality and a two-fold higher risk of major or life-threatening bleedings

Study design Heterogeneous studies Discussion CENTER-Collaboration Not all studies had independent adjudication of clinical events Newest valve types were used in a minimum amount of patients

Study design Heterogeneous studies Discussion CENTER-Collaboration Not all studies had independent adjudication of clinical events Newest valve types were used in a minimum amount of patients Reflection of current practice of TAVI during the past decade (across the globe)

Need to reduce stroke Incidence over time poor outcomes The majority of strokes are directly post-procedure Patient/device selection (?) Cerebral protection devices (?) NOAC (?) Days since TAVI

Spanish TAVI registry Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo Jose M de la Torre Rosana Hernandez-Antolin FRANCE-2 Didier Tchétché Nicolas Dumonteil Thomas Modine BRAVO-3 & WIN-TAVI Jaya Chandrasekhar Samantha Sartori Roxana Mehran CENTER-trial Collaborators National Brazilian TAVI registry Fabio S. de Brito Rogério Sarmento-Leite OBSERVANT Marco Barbanti Paola D Errigo Rabin medical centre Ran Kornowski Katia Orvin Milano Azeem Latib Matteo Pagnesi Padova Augusto D Onofrio Chiara Fraccaro Verona Flavio Ribichini Mattia Lunardi Amsterdam UMC Jan Baan Jan Tijssen Jan Piek Ronak Delewi

Conclusions CENTER-Collaboration The 30-day incidence of stroke after TAVI was 2.4%, this was consistent over time 80% of the strokes occurred during the first week after TAVI Patients with prior cerebrovascular events or a low GFR were at higher risk for stroke There was a strong association between new-onset atrial fibrillation and stroke Stroke was associated with a six-fold increase of 30-day mortality and a two-fold higher risk of major or life-threatening bleedings