AESTHETIC ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY

Similar documents
Severe Malocclusion: Appropriately Timed Treatment. This article discusses challenging issues clinicians face when treating

MAHP Orthognathic Surgery Guidelines. Medical Policy Statement. Criteria

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

Orthognathic treatment of facial asymmetry due to temporomandibular joint ankylosis

Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) prior to combined Le Fort I and sagittal osteotomies: A case report

Case Report. Orthognathic Correction of Class II Open Bite. Using the Piezoelectric System and MatrixORTHOGNATHIC Plating System.

Post-operative stability of the maxilla treated with Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomies in bimaxillary surgery

Ortho-surgical Management of Severe Vertical Dysplasia: A Case Report

Sample Case #1. Disclaimer

The America Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons classify occlusion/malocclusion in to the following three categories:

ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Soft and Hard Tissue Changes after Bimaxillary Surgery in Chinese Class III Patients

SURGICAL MODEL ACCURACY DEVICE. 25 years - manufacturing and distribution - around the globe research - design - manufacturing - distribution

Non-surgical management of skeletal malocclusions: An assessment of 100 cases

Research report for MSc Dent. University of Witwatersrand. Faculty of health science. Dr J Beukes. Student number: h

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

Assessment of Relapse Following Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Mandibular Setback and Short-term Immobilization

ORIGINAL ARTICLE ABSTRACT CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Topic: Orthognathic Surgery Date of Origin: October 5, Section: Surgery Last Reviewed Date: December 2013

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

Interview with Vincent KOKICH

PREDICTING LOWER LIP AND CHIN RESPONSE TO MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT WITH GENIOPLASTY A CEPHALOMETRIC STUDY

How predictable is orthognathic surgery?

Maxillary Advancement Surgery and Nasolabial Soft Tissue Changes

SURGICAL - ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION IN AN ADULT PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons

Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Correction of Midface Retrusion in a Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient

Changes in soft tissue thickness after Le Fort I osteotomy in different cleft types

Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences

Jefferson Cephalometric Analysis--Face and Health Focused

For many years, patients with

Mixed-reality simulation for orthognathic surgery

Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Gummy Smile with Vertical Maxillary Excess

Aesthetic Analysis of the Face: The Maxillofacial Deformity

Postoperative Evaluation on SSRO performed by Short Lingual Osteotomy and IVRO

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Midline Mandibular Osteotomy in an Asymmetric Patient

ORTHO-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS III MALOCCLUSION WITH SEVERE TOOTH SIZE ARCH LENGTH DISCREPANCY

Treatment of Angle Class III. Department of Paedodontics and Orthodontics Dr. habil. Melinda Madléna associate professor

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

Different Non Surgical Treatment Modalities for Class III Malocclusion

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

Long Term Stability and Prediction of Soft Tissue Changes Following LeFort I Surgery

Significant improvement with limited orthodontics anterior crossbite in an adult patient

Orthodontics-surgical combination therapy for Class III skeletal malocclusion

Correction of Dentofacial Deformities (Orthognathic Surgery)

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

For over 30 years, orthognathic surgery has

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 July 27.

Stability and Relapse in Orthognathic Surgery

ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY

Nasolabial Soft Tissue Changes After Le Fort I Advancement

A correlation between a new angle (S-Gn-Go angle) with the facial height

Scientific Treatment Goals for Oral and Facial Harmony

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgical Correction of a Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Patients with small lower jaws may derive aesthetic

Variations in the anatomical dimensions of the mandibular ramus and the presence of third molars: its effect on the sagittal split ramus osteotomy

Patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) usually

06/12/18. [Note: When orthognathic surgery is not a covered benefit, it is non-covered for any diagnosis, including sleep apnea.]

Maxillary Growth Control with High Pull Headgear- A Case Report

Cephalometric Analysis

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

Soft Tissue Changes after Upper Premolar Extraction in Class II Camouflage Therapy

Patient information booklet Orthognathic Surgery

An Adult Case of Skeletal Open Bite with a Severely Narrowed Maxillary Dental Arch

The history of face lift surgery encompasses a wide

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

Morphologic Changes of Nose after LeFort I osteotomy of Skeletal Class III Patients

Research Article Numbers of Beauty: An Innovative Aesthetic Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery Treatment Planning

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

Orthodontic-Surgical Management of a Skeletal Class II Patient with Reverse Smile Arc and Vertical Maxillary Excess

King's College Hospital Dental School, London, S.E. 5.

The changes of soft tissue profile. skeletal class II patients with mandibular retrognathy treated with extraction of maxillary first premolars

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

Orthognathic surgery. Dr. Mohamed Rahil. ((Maxillofacial surgeon))

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Incisal and Soft Tissue Effects of Maxillary Premolar Extraction in Class II Treatment

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

Intraoperative measurement of maxillary repositioning in a series of 30 patients with maxillomandibular vertical asymmetries

Surgical correction of septal deviation after Le Fort I osteotomy

IJCMR 553. ORIGINAL RESEARCH Different Population- Different Analysis A Cephalometric Study. Sachin Singh 1, Jayesh Rahalkar 2 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

JCO INTERVIEWS Richard P. McLaughlin, DDS on Facial and Dental Planning

Postnatal Growth. The study of growth in growing children is for two reasons : -For health and nutrition assessment

Original Research. This appraisal is based on a system of cephalometric analysis that was developed at Indiana University by Burstone and Legan.

ASSESSMENT OF MAXILLARY FIRST MOLAR ROTATION IN SKELETAL CLASS II, AND THEIR COMPARISON WITH CLASS I AND CLASS III SUBJECTS

Virtual model surgery and wafer fabrication for orthognathic surgery

RMO Data Services FOREWORD

A Countdown to Orthognathic Surgery

Evaluation of maxillary protrusion malocclusion treatment effects with prosth-orthodontic method in old adults

PH-04A: Clinical Photography Production Checklist With A Small Camera

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Prosthetic Options in Implant Dentistry. Hakimeh Siadat, DDS, MSc Associate Professor

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

The practice of orthodontics is faced with new

Transcription:

c0435 ESTHETIC ORTHOGNTHIC SURGERY Stephen. aker, MD, DDS, and Harvey Rosen, MD, DMD CHPTER 87 s0010 p0010 s0020 p0015 s0025 p0020 s0030 p0025 s0035 p0030 s0040 p0035 s0045 p0040 1. What is orthognathic surgery? Orthognathic surgery is the term used to describe surgical movement of the tooth-bearing segments of the jaws as well as the maxilla and mandible. It can be used to correct problems related to developmental anomalies, posttraumatic deformities, and sleep apnea. The goal of orthognathic surgery is to establish ideal dental occlusion with the jaws in a position that optimizes facial aesthetics. 2. What is dental compensation? The term dental compensation is used to describe the tendency of teeth to tilt in a direction that minimizes the dental malocclusion. For example, in a patient with an overbite (class II malocclusion), the upper incisors will retrocline while the lower incisors will procline. The opposite occurs in a patient who has dental compensation for an underbite (class III malocclusion). Thus dental compensation will mask the true degree of skeletal discrepancy. Typically, the true skeletal discrepancy is worse than what appears on intraoral examination due to dental compensation. 3. Why is it important to discuss orthodontic camouflage versus surgical treatment prior to initiating orthodontic therapy? In an attempt to correct an overbite with orthodontics alone, an orthodontist will retrocline the upper incisors in an attempt to normalize overjet. This will reduce upper lip support, which will make the nose look more prominent. Many patients who had moderate to severe class II malocclusions corrected with orthodontics alone present for rhinoplasty, complaining of an overprojecting and large nose. In actuality, the nasal dimensions often are normal. It is the jaw relationship that requires correction. It is important to meet with patients before they decide whether to proceed with surgical or nonsurgical orthodontic correction. If the patient elects surgical treatment, the teeth are moved in the opposite direction rather than if nonsurgical orthodontic correction was selected. Therefore it is imperative for this consultation to take place prior to initiation of treatment. 4. What is orthodontic decompensation? Prior to orthognathic surgery, the orthodontist will decompensate the occlusion by removing the degree of dental compensation produced by the skeletal discrepancy. Preoperative orthodontic decompensation allows the surgeon to take advantage of the maximal amount of skeletal advancement possible. 5. What is the ideal vertical position of the maxilla? The vertical position of the maxilla is determined by the amount of the incisors that is visible with the lips in repose. man should show at least 2 to 3 mm, whereas as much as 5 to 6 mm is considered attractive in a woman. If the patient shows the correct degree of incisor in repose but shows excessive gingiva in full smile, the maxilla must not be impacted. The correct degree of incisor in repose is more important than is visible gingiva in full smile. It is undesirable to bury the incisors in repose just to reduce the degree of gingiva in a full smile. If the patient exhibits a long lower face with proper incisal show, the chin may be reduced to reestablish the aesthetic height of the lower facial third ( Fig. 87-1 ). 6. How does the clinician determine the anteroposterior position of the jaws? The profile evaluation focuses on the projection of the upper and lower jaws relative to fixed structures such as the forehead, orbits, and malar regions. The clinician usually can determine whether the deformity is due to the maxilla, mandible, or both just by looking at the patient. The details of the millimeter movements are determined on the cephalometric tracings (Fig. 87-2 ). 7. What is skeletal expansion and why is it important? Movements that result in a net skeletal expansion (anterior or inferior repositioning of the jaws) will attenuate the creases and folds, whereas skeletal contraction (posterior or superior movements of the jaws) will accentuate these problems. prematurely aged appearance is an unfavorable result from jaw movements that result in net skeletal contraction. It is important that the surgeon develop a treatment plan that will expand or maintain the preoperative 563

564 ESTHETIC ORTHOGNTHIC SURGERY G Sn V Sn Me V G Sn H 6±3 mm G Pg H 0±4 mm f0010 Figure 87-1. Soft tissue cephalometric measurements. Left, Vertical perpendicular dropped from glabella (G), the horizontal distance from which is measured at the subnasale (Sn) and pogonion (Pg). Normal values are 6 ± 3 mm and 0 ± 4 mm, respectively. Right, Normal vertical facial proportions: Glabella to subnasale is equal to subnasale to menton (Me). (From Rosen H: esthetic Perspectives in Jaw Surgery. New York, Springer- Verlag, 1999.) HP Me G Sn Pg G-Sn Sn-Me S N N f0015 Figure 87-2. Skeletal cephalometric measurements describing sagittal positions of the jaws. Left, SN and SN measurements relate the maxilla and the mandible to the cranial base. Normal values are 82 ± 4 and 79 ± 3, respectively. Right, Maxillary depth and facial depth angles relate the maxilla and the mandible to the Frankfort horizontal. Normal values are 90 ± 3 and 89 ± 3, respectively. (From Rosen H: esthetic Perspectives in Jaw Surgery. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1999.) O SN angle 82 ± 3 SN angle 79 ± 3 O Pg Maxillary depth angle 90 ± 3 Facial depth angle 89 ± 3 volume of the face. If a superior or posterior (contraction) movement of one of the jaws is planned, an attempt should be made to neutralize the skeletal contraction with an advancement or inferior movement of the other jaw or the chin. It is important to avoid a net contraction of the facial skeleton because this may result in a prematurely aged appearance. s0050 p0045 U1 s0055 p0050 8. How is a lateral cephalometric radiograph obtained? lateral cephalometric radiograph is performed under reproducible conditions so that serial images can be compared. This film usually is done at the orthodontist s office using a cephalostat, an apparatus specifically designed to maintain consistent head position. The surgeon must be able to visualize bony as well as soft tissue features on the image to facilitate tracing of all landmarks. piece of transparent acetate tracing paper is secured with tape over the radiograph and the following landmarks are traced: sella, inferior orbital rim, nasion, frontal bone, nasal bones, maxilla, maxillary first molar and central incisor, external auditory meatus, condylar head and mandible, and mandibular first molar and incisor. The soft tissue of the forehead, nose, lips, and chin also are traced. Once the normal structures are traced, several planes and angles are determined (see Chapter 27, Questions 2 and 21 ). 9. What is the difference between an absolute and relative crossbite? Dental casts allow the clinician to distinguish between absolute and relative transverse maxillary deficiency. bsolute transverse maxillary deficiency presents as a posterior crossbite with the jaws in a class I relationship. relative maxillary transverse deficiency is commonly seen in a patient with a class III malocclusion. posterior crossbite is observed in this type of patient, leading the surgeon to suspect inadequate maxillary width. However, as the maxilla is advanced or the mandible retruded, the crossbite is eliminated. rticulation of the casts into a class I occlusion allows the surgeon to easily distinguish between relative and absolute maxillary constriction.

ESTHETIC SURGERY 565 s0060 p0055 s0065 p0060 s0070 p0065 s0075 p0070 s0080 p0075 10. Is facial disproportion ever acceptable in facial aesthetics? It has been shown that skeletal expansion is aesthetically pleasing even if facial disproportion is necessary to achieve the expansion. Fashion models often exhibit slight degrees of facial disproportion and are considered beautiful. The aesthetic benefits the patient receives by expanding the facial envelope frequently justify the small degree of disproportion necessary to achieve them. Even in young adolescent patients who do not show signs of aging, one must not ignore these principles. successful surgeon will incorporate these principles into the treatment plan of every patient so that as the patient ages, the signs of aging will be minimized and a youthful appearance will be maintained as long as possible. 11. Why is a final splint necessary? The occlusion desired may not be the same as maximum intercuspal position. The splint is useful in maintaining the occlusion in the desired location when it does not correspond to maximal intercuspal position. It is easy for the orthodontist to close a posterior openbite, but it is very difficult to close an anterior openbite with orthodontics alone. t the end of the case it is important to have the anterior teeth and the canines in a class I relationship without an openbite. If the desired occlusion is the same as that produced when the models are placed into maximal intercuspal position, a final splint is not necessary. 12. What is the least stable movement? The least stable movement is transverse expansion of the maxilla. Stable movements include mandibular advancement and superior positioning of the maxilla. Movements with intermediate stability include maxillary impaction combined with mandibular advancement, maxillary advancement combined with mandibular setback, and correction of mandibular asymmetry. The unstable movements include posterior positioning of the mandible and inferior positioning of the maxilla. 13. What are the causes of malocclusion after skeletal fixation? Improper positioning of the jaws is noted by poor occlusion or an obvious unaesthetic result. If this complication results from improper condyle position during fixation or improper indexing of the splint, fixation must be removed and reapplied. It is wise to verify splint fit prior to surgery. Meticulous treatment planning prior to surgery minimizes splint-related problems. 14. How is lip length affected by closure of the circumvestibular incision? linear closure of a circumvestibular incision will shorten lip length and cause thinning of the lip. ccording to Rosen, the lip shortens by 20% to 50% of the amount of vertical maxillary reduction. The best way to minimize this shortening is to do a V-Y closure at the midline of the incision. skin hook can be placed at the midline and used to pull the incision up while the vertical limb of the V-Y closure is performed. This limb typically is approximately 1 to 1.5 cm but can be modified in specific indications ( Fig. 87-3 ). Figure 87-3. V-Y closure at the anteriormost portion of the maxillary buccal incision minimizes lip shortening. skin hook is placed in the mucosa superior to the incision at the midline. The vertical limb is closed for 1 cm with a running suture. Each lateral incision is closed with a continuous locking 4-0 chromic suture. (From ooth PW, Schendel S, Hausamen JE [eds]: Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol 2, 2nd ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 2006.) f0020

566 ESTHETIC ORTHOGNTHIC SURGERY Right C Cross section at angle D F E Dimensions - 79 mm - 32 mm C - 5 or 10 mm D - 7 mm E - 5 or 10 mm F - 10 mm f0025 s0085 p0080 s0090 p0085 s0095 p0090 s0100 p0095 s0105 p0100 Figure 87-4., Soft tissue contour and skeletal configuration of patient with mandibular deficiency and class II malocclusion., Configuration and dimensions of mandibular body implant used to augment the deficient mandible. ecause it extends beyond the posterior border of the ramus and inferior edge of the ramus and body, it closes the mandibular angle and lessens the plane of the mandibular border. Screw fixation guarantees position and ensures application of implant to skeleton. (From Yaremchuk MJ: Mandibular augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:697, 2000.) 15. What is the role of alloplastic augmentation in orthognathic surgery? lloplastic augmentation can be a useful tool in achieving aesthetic augmentation with minimal morbidity and recovery in a patient who may benefit from the skeletal augmentation but has no occlusal problems that require an osteotomy. Mandibular angle implants will enhance mandibular definition and soft tissue support in the patient with short rami and a steep mandibular plane. In facial rejuvenation patients, this skeletal augmentation can greatly enhance the aesthetic result and provide much better soft tissue support than can be achieved with soft tissue repositioning alone. Piriform and malar implants can provide soft tissue support that enhances facial aesthetics as well in patients who have a class I occlusion but suffer from lack of adequate midfacial skeletal projection ( Figs. 87-4 and 87-5 ). 16. When should the nose be addressed in the orthognathic patient? ecause Le Fort I osteotomy will alter the dimensions of the nose, definitive rhinoplasty should be deferred until after the patient recovers from the maxillary osteotomy. The Le Fort procedure requires dissection and release of tissues from the anterior nasal spine. The effects of these maneuvers will cause nasal tip rotation. Even in isolated mandibular osteotomies, the surgeon must remember that nasal intubation is required to place the patient in maxillomandibular fixation prior to application of rigid fixation. If rhinoplasty is to be performed at this time, the patient must be reintubated orally after the mandibular procedure is completed. It is acceptable to perform rhinoplasty in conjunction with mandibular osteotomies, but we recommend doing rhinoplasties at least 6 months after maxillary procedures. 17. What nasal changes are seen after orthognathic surgery? If the maxilla is moved anteriorly, the nasal tip moves anterior and the dorsum may appear too low for the new position of the nasal tip. If the maxilla is moved posteriorly, the nasal tip will decrease its projection and the dorsum of the nose may appear too high relative to the new position of the nasal tip. The nasal length may decrease with maxillary movement and the nasolabial angle will increase. Maxillary osteotomies will result in increased alar width. 18. How can alar widening be reduced in maxillary surgery? The alar cinch is a procedure that places a suture from an intraoral incision that takes a bite from each transversalis nasi muscle and pulls them together to normalize ideal alar width. Weir excisions also can be useful in restoring ideal alar aesthetics after maxillary osteotomies ( Fig. 87-6 ). 19. What are the soft tissue changes in the upper lip that occur after Le Fort I osteotomy? The upper lip will thin approximately 2 mm from its preoperative thickness after a Le Fort I sulcus incision has been closed. Flattening of the lip also occurs, and downturning of the lateral commissures can be seen. It is important to counsel patients about these changes prior to surgery. Fat grafting or Restylane may be useful in restoring lip volume. These soft tissue fillers also are useful for nonsurgical modification of incisal show if postoperative modifications are necessary.

ESTHETIC SURGERY 567 Tear trough implant f0030 Submalar implant Pre-jowl implant Figure 87-5. Three implants used primarily to fill out involutional soft tissue deficiencies that occur with aging. Depicted are the tear trough, the submalar implant, and the prejowl implant. (From Mathes S [ed]: Plastic Surgery, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2006.) Figure 87-6. lar cinch stitch is designed to prevent alar widening after Le Fort I osteotomy and allow the surgeon to control the width of the nose. 2-0 Prolene suture is used to grasp the transversalis nasi muscle on each side of the nose. The suture is tightened to the point that normal alar width is restored. (From ooth PW, Schendel S, Hausamen JE [eds]: Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol 2, 2nd ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 2006.) f0035 s0110 p0105 s0115 p0110 20. What is the role of genioplasty in orthognathic surgery? genioplasty is commonly required in orthognathic surgery to optimize chin position after the jaws have been moved into the desired location. When the mandible is moved either anteriorly or posteriorly the chin will move with the mandible. If the final position of the chin is not ideal, it should be moved into the optimal location based on the anticipated facial changes that will occur from the orthognathic procedure. These anticipated postoperative facial changes and the new desired position of the chin are based on the postoperative cephalometric tracings that are performed as part of the treatment planning phase of the procedure. 21. What is the role of fat grafting? utogenous fat grafting can be a useful adjunct procedure in the adult orthognathic patient. Many patients desire cosmetic as well as functional improvements, and fat grafting is a relatively benign method for augmenting any remaining deficiencies in the soft tissue envelope after skeletal expansion. Fat can be easily harvested using either Coleman or Tulip syringes and injected into the desired areas to fill depressions that can persist in the nasolabial crease, paramandibular, or piriform regions. s our understanding of adipocyte biology as well as the effects on the adipocytes from harvesting, processing, and injection improves, fat grafting will be used more commonly to achieve an optimal aesthetic result for the orthognathic surgical patient. U2 U3 ILIOGRPHY 1. Coleman SR : Structural fat grafts: The ideal filler. Clin Plast Surg 28 :111 119, 2001. 2. O Ryan F, Schendel S : Nasal anatomy and maxillary surgery. II Unfavorable nasolabial esthetics following the Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Orthodon Orthognath Surg 4 :75 84, 1989. 3. Proffit WR, Sarver DM : Treatment planning: Optimizing benefit to the patient. In Proffit WR, White RP, Sarver DM (eds): Contemporary Treatment of Dentofacial Deformity. Mosby, St. Louis, 2003, pp 213 223. 4. Proffit WR, Turvey T, Phillips C : Orthognathic surgery: hierarchy of stability. Int J dult Orthod Orthogn Surg 11 :191 204, 1996. 5. Rosen H : esthetics in facial skeletal surgery. Perspect Plast Surg 6 :1, 1993. 6. Rosen HM : Facial skeletal expansion: Treatment strategies and rationale. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 :798 808, 1992. 7. Rosen HM : Lip-nasal esthetics following Le Fort I osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 81 :171 182, 1988. 8. Stella JP, Streater MR, Epker N, Sinn DP : Predictability of upper lip soft tissue changes with maxillary advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47 :697 703, 1989. 9. Stuzin J : Restoring facial shape in facelifting: The role of skeletal support in facial analysis and midface soft-tissue repositioning. Plast Reconstr Surg 119 :362 376, 2007. 10. Terino EO : Facial contouring with alloplastic implants. Facial Plast Surg Clin North m 7 :85 103, 1997.

uthor Query Form ook: Plastic Surgery Secrets Chapter No.: 00087 Query Details Required uthor s Response [U1] Pls. check cross references to questions in different chapter. [U2] References resorted to alphabetical order. [U3] This reference was provided twice; second one deleted.