Development of Screening Tests for

Similar documents
VICH GL23: Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: genotoxicity testing

Toxicity and Genotoxicity of Pendimethalin in Maize and Onion

Chapter 8: Cellular Reproduction

Lecture -2- Environmental Biotechnology

Genotoxicity Testing Strategies: application of the EFSA SC opinion to different legal frameworks in the food and feed area

The Cell Cycle. Packet #9. Thursday, August 20, 2015

Genotoxicity of formaldehyde in vitro and in vivo. Günter Speit

B. 12. MUTAGENICITY IN VIVO MAMMALIAN ERYTHROCYTE MICRONUCLEUS TEST

OECD/OCDE Adopted: 29 July 2016

A. Incorrect! All the cells have the same set of genes. (D)Because different types of cells have different types of transcriptional factors.

In vitro Toxicological Screening of Genetic Damages in Humans by Micronucleus Test

Ploidy and Human Cell Types. Cell Cycle and Mitosis. DNA and Chromosomes. Where It All Began 11/19/2014. Chapter 12 Pg

The questions below refer to the following terms. Each term may be used once, more than once, or not at all.

EVALUATION OF CYTOTOXICITY OF DICHLORVOS PESTICIDE IN LABORATORY MOUSE

(a) Reproduction. (b) Growth and development. (c) Tissue renewal

Mitosis. AND Cell DiVISION

Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Cell Division. The Process of Cell Division Section Section 10.2: The Process of Cell Division 12/8/2010

meiosis asexual reproduction CHAPTER 9 & 10 The Cell Cycle, Meiosis & Sexual Life Cycles Sexual reproduction mitosis

Biology is the only subject in which multiplication is the same thing as division

Campbell Biology in Focus (Urry) Chapter 9 The Cell Cycle. 9.1 Multiple-Choice Questions

Cell Cycle and Cell Division

Outline Interphase Mitotic Stage Cell Cycle Control Apoptosis Mitosis Mitosis in Animal Cells Cytokinesis Cancer Prokaryotic Cell Division

Cell Division. Chromosome structure. Made of chromatin (mix of DNA and protein) Only visible during cell division

Why do cells divide? Cells divide in order to make more cells they multiply in order to create a larger surface to volume ratio!!!

The Cell Cycle and How Cells Divide

Chapter 2. Mitosis and Meiosis

BIOLOGY - CLUTCH CH.12 - CELL DIVISION.

Breaking Up is Hard to Do (At Least in Eukaryotes) Mitosis

Cell Division and Mitosis

Regulators of Cell Cycle Progression

Cellular Reproduction Chapter 8

Cell Division (Mitosis)

The Cell Cycle. Chapter 12. Biology. Edited by Shawn Lester. Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

GENOTOXICITY: SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF REGULATORY GENOTOXICITY TESTS FOR PHARMACEUTICALS *)

Why do cells reproduce?

The Cell Life Cycle. S DNA replication, INTERPHASE. G 2 Protein. G 1 Normal THE CELL CYCLE. Indefinite period. synthesis. of histones.

Spindle damaging effect of salbutamol sulphate on bone marrow cells of mice

Biology is the only subject in which multiplication is the same thing as division

10-2 Cell Division. Slide 1 of 38. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

Mitosis vs. Meiosis. The Somatic Cell Cycle (Mitosis) The somatic cell cycle consists of 3 phases: interphase, m phase, and cytokinesis.

Mitosis THE CELL CYCLE. In unicellular organisms, division of one cell reproduces the entire organism Multicellular organisms use cell division for..

Biology is the only subject in which multiplication is the same thing as division

Cell Division Questions. Mitosis and Meiosis

LECTURE PRESENTATIONS

BIOLOGY LTF DIAGNOSTIC TEST CELL CYCLE & MITOSIS

The Cell Cycle CHAPTER 12

Annex II. Scientific conclusions and grounds for variation to the terms of the marketing authorisations

10-2 Cell Division. Chromosomes

The Cell Cycle. Chapter 12. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Biology is the only subject in which multiplication is the same thing as division

Cell Division and Inheritance

Unit 4: Cell Division Guided Notes

6 REPLICATED CHROMOSOMES

Mitosis Notes AP Biology Mrs. Laux

NOTES- CHAPTER 6 CHROMOSOMES AND CELL REPRODUCTION

The Cell Cycle. Chapter 12. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece

Biology is the only subject in which multiplication is the same thing as division

Breaking Up is Hard to Do (At Least in Eukaryotes) Mitosis

Chromosomes and Cell Cycle

Cell Cycle. Interphase, Mitosis, Cytokinesis, and Cancer

The Cell Cycle CAMPBELL BIOLOGY IN FOCUS SECOND EDITION URRY CAIN WASSERMAN MINORSKY REECE

Gametogenesis. To complete this worksheet, select: Module: Continuity Activity: Animations Title: Gametogenesis. Introduction

LECTURE PRESENTATIONS

10-2 Cell Division mitosis. cytokinesis. Chromosomes chromosomes Slide 1 of 38

Reproduction is a fundamental property of life. Cells are the fundamental unit of life. Reproduction occurs at the cellular level with one mother

The Cell Cycle. Chapter 12. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

(i) List these events in the correct order, starting with D.... (1)... (1)... (1)

BIOH122 Session 26 Gametogenesis. Introduction. 1. a. Define gametogenesis. b. What cells are gametes?

APGRU4L1 Chap 12 Extra Reading Cell Cycle and Mitosis

Mitosis/Meiosis Simulation Activities

T R L J. Version 2, 2018 NAME: OPTION GROUP: CELL DIVISION MITOSIS WORKBOOK

Mitosis & Meiosis. Diploid cells- (2n)- a cell that has 2 of each chromosome - 1 from mom, 1 from dad = 1 pair

BIOLOGY 4/6/2015. Cell Cycle - Mitosis. Outline. Overview: The Key Roles of Cell Division. identical daughter cells. I. Overview II.

Part II The Cell Cell Division, Chapter 2 Outline of class notes

Prentice Hall Biology Slide 1 of 38

Mitosis and the Cell Cycle

Chapter 10 Chromosomes and Cell Reproduction

Chapter 12. living /non-living? growth repair renew. Reproduction. Reproduction. living /non-living. fertilized egg (zygote) next chapter

Biology is the only subject in which multiplication is the same thing as division. AP Biology

Cell Cycle/Mitosis -Notes-

B.5ABCD Cell Differentiation

3/19/17. Chromosomes. Chromosome Structure. Chromosome Structure. Chromosome Structure. Chapter 10: Cell Growth & Division

Cell Cycle Phase. Interphase (G 1, S, G 2 ) Mitotic Phase (M phase) Prophase. Metaphase. Anaphase. Telophase

The Process of Cell Division

Biology is the only subject in which multiplication is the same thing as division

Genotoxicity of 2-Hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (Lawsone, CAS )

cells divide? Growth Development Repair Asexual reproduction Formation of gametes

General Embryology. School of Medicine Department of Anatomy and Histology School of medicine The University of Jordan

Change in frequency of radiation induced micronuclei during interphase of four-cell mouse embryos in vitro

CH 9: The Cell Cycle Overview. Cellular Organization of the Genetic Material. Distribution of Chromosomes During Eukaryotic Cell Division

How Cells Divide. Chapter 10

Unit 5: Cell Cycle, Mitosis, Meiosis & Drug Influence Influence on Nervous System

Sexual Reproduction and Genetics. Section 1. Meiosis

Cell cycle and apoptosis

The Cell Cycle 4/10/12. Chapter 12. Overview: The Key Roles of Cell Division

Chapter 12 The Cell Cycle: Cell Growth, Cell Division

OECD/OCDE OECD GUIDELINE FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS. Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test

Name: Cell division and cancer review

Transcription:

Environmental Health Perspectives Supplements Vol. 101 (Suppl. 3): 5-9 (1993) Development of Screening Tests for Aneuploidy Induction by Environmental Pollutants by Ilse-Dore Adler1 and James M. Parry2 When legally required mutagenicity testing of chemicals is undertaken, the important genetic end point of aneuploidy is not included because validated test methods are lacking. Therefore, the Commission of the European Communities (CEC) has funded a research program to develop and validate tests for aneuploidy induction. Ten chemicals, selected on the basis of their ability to interact with cell organelles relevant for aneuploidy induction, were tested in 11 laboratories. The assays ranged from in vitro tubulin assembly studies to in vivo germ-cell tests. The results allow several conclusions: a) Fungal aneuploidy tests are not capable of detecting inhibitors of mammalian tubulin polymerization such as colchicine and vinblastine. Therefore, they will not play a role in screening for aneuploidy but are of value for studying the relationship between induced aneuploidy and recombination. b) Chemicals that induce aneuploidy in mammalian germ cells are readily detected in the in vitro mammalian cell systems. Some chemicals such as thiabendazole and thimerosal induce aneuploidy in vitro but do not appear to be very effective in vivo. c) Cell division aberrations induced in mammalian cells in vitro seem to be predictive for aneuploidy induction in the same cell type. Likewise, c-mitotic effects and cell cycle delay in vivo in mitotic and meiotic cells correlate with aneuploidy induction in the respective tissue. A second CEC Aneuploidy Program has started recently to refine the most promising test protocols, to provide understanding of the variety of mechanisms by which chemicals induce aneuploidy, and to establish a data base for aneugens among environmental pollutants. Introduction Although numerical chromosome changes have been implicated in both somatic and inherited disease, the role of induced aneuploidy is poorly understood. Unlike the induction of point mutations, where the predominant site of chemical action is the DNA, the induction of aneuploidy may theoretically be produced by chemical action upon a wide variety of cellular targets. These targets include synthesis and polymerization of tubulin; synthesis and functioning of tubulin-associated proteins; functioning of cell division spindle fibers; action of centromere and associated kinetochore proteins; replication and separation of polar bodies; fidelity of the events of homologous chromosome pairing and recombination during meiosis. A number ofprevious studies supported by the Commission of the European Communities (CEC) Environmental Projects indicated that a diverse range of chemicals (aneugens) were capable of inducing aneuploidy in a num- 'GSF-Institut fiur Siaugetiergenetik, 8042 Neuherberg, Germany. 2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Swansea, UK. Address reprint requests to I.-D. Adler, GSF-Institut fur Saugetiergenetik, 8042 Neuherberg, Germany. ber of species in fungi (1). However, little information was available as to the relevance of these fungal observations to human health. Neither was there any evidence to indicate to what extent the available fungal test systems were able to detect the overall spectrum of chemicals that induce aneuploidy in mammals. In 1987, a coordinated program was initiated under the auspices of the CEC with the aim to develop a database that would allow the recommendation of screening tests for the measurement of aneuploidy induction (2). Ten model compounds were tested in a series of in vitro and in vivo aneuploidy assays. These chemicals were colchicine (COL), econazole (EZ), chloral hydrate (CH), hydroquinone (HQ), diazepam (DZ), thiabendazole (TB), cadmium chloride (CD), thimerosal (TM), pyrimethamine (PY) and vinblastine (VBL) (3). During the first 4 years, participation of seven laboratories was supported by CEC contracts (A. Kappas, Athens; A. Abbondandolo, Genova; R. Barale, Pisa; A. Carere, Roma; J.M. Parry, Swansea; I.- D. Adler, Neuherberg, A.T. Natarajan, Leiden), and four laboratories collaborated voluntarily (S. Albertini, Basel; B. Hartley-Asp, Helsingborg; M. Kirsch-Volders, Brussels; S.S. Sandhu, Research Triangle Park). The assay systems used ranged from in vitro tubulin polymerization, via mitotic aneuploidy in fungi (Sac-

6 ADLER AND PARRY charomyces and Aspergillus), cell division abnormalities, micronuclei and aneuploidy in cultured mammalian cells, induction of somatic aneuploidy in plants, c-mitotic effects, mitotic delay, hyperploidy/polyploidy and clastogenicity in rodent bone marrow cells, as well as meiotic delay and hyperploidy in male germ cells. At the time of conception of the project, no assays were available for the detection and assessment of chemical aneugens that could be considered to have reached the level of development and validation that could make them suitable for incorporation in the Guidelines for the Chemical Safety Programs of the CEC or the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). In evaluating the results ofthe first phase of the project,i certain questions were asked: a) What proportion of those chemicals that were capable of inducing aneuploidy in mammalian cells could be detected using simple fungal screening tests? b) To what extent were fungal results predictive of aneuploidy induction in mammals? c) Were there assay systems with the potential to be developed as recommended procedures for the detection of aneugenic chemicals? d) Do aneugens represent somatic and/or germ cell hazards, and what are the relationships between the two events? The results of the first phase of experiments with the 10 chemicals are presented in summary, and the points of interest are discussed. Results of in Vitro Testing A summary of the results of the in vitro testing is presented in Table 1. The tubulin polymerization assays gave clear positive responses with COL, CH, TB, TM, and VBL (4). In contrast, the results with EZ, HQ, DZ, CD, and PY were of borderline significance or positive in one and negative in the other laboratory (5). These observations have two possible explanations. Either the test protocol requires further modification to unequivocally detect the latter group of compounds as positive, or the primary target of some of these chemicals is not tubulin but are other cell organelles as indicated above. In the fungal tests, four chemicals were clearly positive (EZ, CH, TB, and TM), four chemicals gave equivocal results (HQ, DZ, CD, and PY), but most strikingly two chemicals were clearly negative [COL and VBL (6-7)]. These latter two chemicals were chosen as positive controls for the project because they are known mammalian spindle inhibitors. It is of particular relevance for the capabilities of detection by fungal systems that these spindle poisons were missed. In the mammalian cell assays, all 10 chemicals induced aneuploidy and division aberrations including cells with multipolar, monopolar, or lacking spindles, dislocation of chromosomes from the spindle, and lagging chromosomes at anaphase or telophase (8). The induction of micronuclei in cytochalasin-b arrested cells was observed with all 10 chemicals when human fibroblasts were used, but could only be detected for four of the chemicals in human lymphocytes [COL, CH, HQ, and VBL (9,10)]. Two chemicals (CD and TM) gave contradictory results in the two laboratories (9,10). In primary Chinese hamster cells, all the chemicals but EZ and HQ induced micronuclei (11,12). Micronuclei containing centric and acentric moieties were discriminated by the use of immunofluorescent labeling for the presence of centromeric protein by CREST antibodies (13). These autoantibodies to kinetochore proteins are present in the serum of patients with the calcinosis/raynauld's phenomenon/esophageal dysmotility/ sclerodactyly/teleangiectesia (CREST) variant of scleroderma. An excess of CREST-positive micronuclei over the control range was observed with COL, CH, TB, and VBL, indicating that the majority (51-94%) of the micronuclei induced by these compounds was derived from whole chromosomes lagging during mitosis. For DZ and CD, the CREST-positive micronucleus frequencies were slightly Table 1. Synopsis of in vitro data: Athens, Basel, Brussels, Genova, Pisa, Rome, and Swansea.a Chemical COL EZ CH HQ DZ TB CD TM PY VBL lhbulin + + -(+) +(+) -(+) + + + -(+) + + (+) + + Aneuploidy Yeast -- + - + + + - ()- + + + - + + (+ +) Aspergillus - - + + + +(+) - + + - + - + nt Mammalian cells + + + + + + (+) + + + Division aberrations Immortal cells + + + + + + + + + + Primary cells + + + + + + (+) + + + Micronuclei Primary Chinese + - + - + + + + + + hamster cells Human lymphocytes + + +++ + - +-- + Human fibroblasts + + + + (+) (+) (+) + ) + % CREST positive 84-92 28-43 51-85 34-40 54 54-86 35-57 38 40 94 micronuclei (controls, 34-41) Abbreviations: COL, colchicine; EZ, econazole; CH, chloral hydrate; HQ, hydroquinone; DZ, diazepam; TB, thiabendazole; CD, cadmium chloride; TM, thimerosal, PY, pyrimethamine; VBL, vinblastine. CREST, autoantibody to kinetochore proteins present in the serum of patients with the calcinosis/raynauld's phenomenon/esophageal dysmotility/sclerodactyly/teleangiectesia (CREST) variant of cleroderma; nt, not tested. aeach plus or minus represents the results of one laboratory; parentheses indicate borderline responses.

SCREENING TESTS FOR ANEUPLOIDY INDUCTION 7 elevated above control level and for EZ, HQ, TM, and PY they were in the control range (9-10,12). Results of in Vivo Testing A summary of the results of the in vivo testing is presented in Table 2. In mouse bone marrow cells, the induction of mitotic arrest, c-mitoses, and anaphase decrease was observed for five of the chemicals (COL, EZ, CH, HQ, and VBL), whereas the other five compounds had no significant effects (3). The average cell generation time based on counting the proportions of first, second, and third mitoses in BrdUlabeled bone marrow mitoses was prolonged by COL, CH, HQ, TB, and VBL (14-16). Chromosome counts in BrdUlabeled second mitoses ofmouse bone marrow cells showed hyperploidy to be induced by COL, CH, HQ, and VBL (14-17). The other participating laboratories all found a small increase in hyperploid cells with these four chemicals and additionally with EZ and DZ (18). Polyploidies were only seen with COL and VBL in one of the two laboratories (14-18) and also with HQ in the second laboratory (18). It should be noted that HQ also readily induced structural chromosome aberrations (19). A clastogenic response was also seen with the two spindle poisons and CD in one laboratory (18). Micronuclei were found in mouse polychromatic erythrocytes after treatment with COL, HQ, and VBL by all participating laboratories (14,16,18,20). One laboratory also obtained a positive micronucleus response with TB and PY (14). Another laboratory (not shown in Table 2) obtained a weak micronucleus induction with CH, DZ, TB, CD, TM, and PY, which was only observed with one of several doses in the lower dose range tested and never exceeded a doubling of the concurrent control values; however, the positive effect was confirmed in a second experiment (18). As expected, the two spindle poisons elevated the frequencies of CREST-positive micronuclei above the control level. However, only 15% of the HQ-induced micronuclei showed a positive CREST response (21,22), indicating that at the doses tested the clastogenic action of HQ masked the spindle effects in the micronucleus assay. Meiotic arrest was induced in mouse spermatocytes with COL, EZ, CH, HQ, DZ, CD, and VBL (23). These 7 chemicals also increased hyperploidy in second meiotic divisions of mouse spermatocytes in the same laboratory (23). The other laboratory obtained an increase in hyperploid second meiotic divisions with COL, HQ, and TB, but not with CH, DZ, and CD (14). The differences in results from the two laboratories are most likely due to different test protocols. Conclusions In response to the questions posed in the Introduction, the following conclusions are drawn based on the data from the first set of tests for aneuploidy. Fungal test systems are not capable of detecting potent inhibitors of mammalian tubulin polymerization such as colchicine and vinblastine. However, fungal systems uniquely provide the potential for studying the relationship between induced aneuploidy and recombination. They are also a valuable tool for studying structure-activity relationships of some aneugens. Aneuploidy may be induced by a diverse range ofmechanisms. Chemicals that induce aneuploidy in germ cells by mechanisms involving modification of the spindle apparatus are readily detected in the in vitro mammalian cell systems. Analysis of the effects of the test chemicals upon the fidelity of mitotic cell division in vitro appears to be remarkably predictive for aneuploidy induction in the same system. Likewise, cell cycle delay in vivo in mitotic or meiotic cells is obviously predictive for aneuploidy induction in the respective tissue. As seen in many other test systems, chemicals such as cadmium chloride, which have a narrow dose window of response are difficult to evaluate. Some chemicals, such as thiabendazole and thimerosal are potent inducers of aneuploidy in vitro, yet do not appear to be very effective Table 2. Synopsis of in vivo data: Neuherberg, Brussels, Rome, Pisa, and Shreveport.a Chemical COL EZ CH HQ DZ TB CD TM PY VBL Bone marrow c-mitoses + + + + - - - - - + Cell cycle delay + - + + - + - - - + Hyperploidy + + -+ + + + + -+ -- -- -- -- + + Polyploidy ++ + ++ Structural -+ -- -- + + _+ chromosomal aberrations Micronuclei + + + + + + - - - - - - + + + % Crest positive 66 15 70 micronuclei Spermatocytes Meiotic arrest + + + + + - + - - + Hyperploidies + + + - +- + + -- -- + Abbreviations: COL, colchicine; EZ, econazole; CH, chloral hydrate; HQ, hydroquinone; DZ, diazepam; TB, thiabendazole; CD, cadmium chloride; TM, thimerosal, PY, pyrimethamine; VBL, vinblastine. aeach plus or minus represents the results of one laboratory.

8 ADLER AND PARRY in vivo. It is important to determine whether such chemicals and/or their metabolites reach the germ cells and somatic tissue in rodents. As a preliminary recommendation, a simplified screening procedure can be envisaged consisting of three steps: a) Evaluation of cell division aberrations in cultured mammalian cells, b) analysis of mitotic arrest and c-mitoses in rodent bone marrow cells, and c) determination of meiotic delay in rodent germ cells. More questions arose from the results of the first set of experiments than could be answered in the study period. Therefore, a new CEC Aneuploidy Program commenced in late 1991 and focuses primarily on six points that address the most prominent issues that arose from the previous program (Table 3). Because the previous studies indicate that lower eukaryotic tests such as those that use fungal cultures are not predictive for the activity of aneugenic chemicals in higher organisms, the new project predominantly uses mammalian cell systems and intact rodents. Mechanisms. Cellular targets in the mammalian cell of significance in the interaction of aneugenic chemicals will be identified and the relative role of damage to such targets in inducing aneuploidy will be determined. Furthermore, the role of aneugenic chemicals in the progressive stages of tumor development will be determined in the cell transformation assay. Metabolism. The role of cellular and organ-speciflc metabolism in the interaction of environmental chemicals with cellular targets of relevance will be studied. Labeled chemicals will be used to determine their distribution in rodents. Sex and Tissue Specificity The mechanisms of action and relative activities of aneugenic chemicals in both germ cells and somatic cells will be analyzed in rodents. Research will be undertaken to determine the potential value of transgenic animals in the detection of induced aneuploidy in specific rodent tissues. Environmental Significance. Chemicals of environmental significance will be tested with the simplified screening procedure, such as noscapine, tear gas, and methyl vinyl sulphone, which have already been found positive in vitro (24-26), industrial solvents and pesticides, e.g., benomyl, which has been labeled as a potential mutagen by the CEC based on in vitro and in vivo data (27,28). Table 3. Second CEC Aneuploidy Program, 1991-1993. Main topics Mechanisms Metabolism Sex and tissue specificity Environmental significance Optimal test systems Aneugen database Chemicals of environmental significance Noscapine Industrial solvents Pesticides (e.g., benomyl) Tear gas Acrylamides Optimal Test System. The refinement of protocols for the detection of induced aneuploidy in cultured mammalian cells and intact rodents will particularly focus on the micronucleus and chromosome counting techniques by using immunofluorescent in situ labeling techniques. Emphasis will be placed on the development of molecular probes for the analysis of specific chromosomes and the development of improved methods to analyze cell preparations. Aneugen Database. The range of chemicals evaluated in the most promising aneuploidy test systems will be expanded with the aim of classifying the particular chemical classes capable of interacting with relevant cellular targets. It is the ultimate goal of the project to establish a database for aneugens and to recommend a reliable set of screening tests for aneuploidy induction. This research was supported by the CEC Environmental Programme. REFERENCES 1. Parry, J. M. Studies upon the genetic effects of environmental chemicals: the coordinated research programme of the European Economic Community. Mutagenesis 3: 105-136 (1988). 2. Parry, J. M. The validation of test systems for the detection of chemicals capable of inducing numerical chromosome aberrations. Mutagenesis 2: 309 (1987). 3. Miller, B. M., and Adler, I.-D. Suspect spindle poisons: analysis of c-mitotic effects in mouse bone marrow cells. Mutagenesis 4: 208-215 (1989). 4. Brunner, M., Albertini, S., and Wiurgler, F. E. Effects of 10 known or suspect spindle poisons in the in vitro porcine brain tubulin assembly assay. Mutagenesis 6: 65-70 (1991). 5. Wallin, N, and Hartley-Asp, B. Effects of potential aneuploidy inducing agents on their microtubule assembly in vitro. Mutat. Res., in press. 6. Albertini, S. Analysis of nine known or suspected spindle poisons for mitotic chromosomal malsegregation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae D61-M. Mutagenesis 5: 453-460 (1990). 7. Parry, J. M, Parry, E. M., Warr, T., Lynch, A., and James, S. The detection of aneugens using yeasts and cultured mammalian cells. In: Mutation and the Environment, Part B (M. L. Mendelsohn and R. J. Albertini, Eds.), Wiley Liss, New York, 1990, pp. 247-266. 8. Warr, T., and Parry, J. M. A comparison of two in vitro cytogenetic assays for the detection of aneuploidy using ten known or suspected aneugens. Mutat. Res., in press. 9. Bonatti, S., Cavalieri, Z., Viaggi, S., Abbondandolo, A. The analysis of the potential spindle poisons for their ability to induce CRESTpositive micronuclei in human diploid fibroblasts. Mutagenesis, in press. 10. Sbrana, I., Di Sibio, A., Lorri, A., Scarcelli, V. C-mitosis and numerical chromosome analysis in human lymphocytes, 10 known or suspect spindle poisons. Mutat. Res., in press. 11. Antoccia, A., Degrassi, F., Battistoni, A., Ciliutti, P., and Tanzarella, C. In vitro micronucleus test with kinetochore staining: evaluation of test performance. Mutagenesis 6: 319-324 (1991). 12. Lynch, A. M, and Parry, J. M. The cytochalasin-b micronucleus kinetochore assay in vitro: studies with 10 suspected aneugens. Mutat. Res., in press. 13. Degrassi, F., and Tanzarella, C. Immunofluorescent staining of kinetochores in micronuclei: a new assay for the detection of aneuploidy. Mutat. Res, 203: 339-345 (1988). 14. Leopardi, P., Zijno, A., Bassani, B., and Pacchierotti, F. In vivo studies on chemically induced aneuploidy in mouse somatic and germ cells. Mutat. Res., in press. 15. Manca, A., Bassani, B., Russo, A., and Pacchierotti, F. Origin of aneuploidy in relation to disturbances of cell cycle progression. I.

SCREENING TESTS FOR ANEUPLOIDY INDUCTION 9 Effects of vinblastine on mouse bone marrow cells. Mutat. Res. 229: 29-36 (1990). 16. Pacchierotti, F., Bassani, B., Leopardi, P. and Zijno, A. Origin of aneuploidy in relation to disturbances on cell cycle progression. II: Cytogenetic analysis of various parameters in mouse bone marrow cells after colchicine and hydroquinone treatment. Mutagenesis 6: 307-312 (1991). 17. Gustavino, B., Bassani, B., and Pachierotti, F. Vinblastine-induced numerical chromosome changes and selection processes in mouse bone marrow cells. Mutat. Res. 248: 45-50 (1991). 18. Barale, R., Marrazzini, A., and Betti, C. The Micronucleus Assay and Chromosome Metaphase Analysis in Mice Bone Marrow Cells. CEC Progress Report, Estoril, Portugal, 1991. 19. Wang, X, and Adler, I.-D. Clastogenic effects of known and suspect spindle poisons studied by chromosome analysis in mouse bone marrow cells. Mutagenesis 5: 371-374 (1990). 20. Adler, I.-D., Kliesch, U., van Hummelen, R, and Kirsch-Volders, M. Mouse micronucleus tests with known and suspect spindle poisons: results from two laboratories. Mutagenesis 6: 47-53 (1991). 21. Miller, B. M, and Adler, I.-D. Application of antikinetochore antibody staining (CREST staining) to micronuclei in erythrocytes induced in vivo. Mutagenesis 5: 411-415 (1990). 22. Miller, B. M., Zitzelsberger, H. F., Weier, H.-Ul. G., and Adler, I.-D. Classification of micronuclei in murine erythrocytes: immunofluorescent staining using CREST-antibodies compared to in situ hybridization with biotinylated gamma satellite DNA. Mutagenesis 6: 297-302 (1991). 23. Miller, B. M., and Adler, I.-D. Aneuploidy induction in mouse spermatocytes. Mutagenesis 7: 69-76 (1992). 24. Schmid, E., Bauchinger, M., Ziegler-Skylakakis, K., and Andrae, U. 2-Chlorobenzylidene malonitrile (CS) causes spindle disturbances in V79 Chinese hamster cells. Mutat. Res. 226: 133-136 (1989). 25. Mitchell, I., Carlton, J. B., Chan, M. Y. W., Robinson, A., and Sunderland, J. Noscapine-induced polyploidy in vitro. Mutagenesis 6: 479-486 (1991). 26. Warr, T. J., Parry. J. M., Callander, R. D., and Ashby, J. Methyl vinyl sulphone: a new class of Michael-type genotoxin. Mutat. Res. 245: 191-199 (1990). 27. Georgieva, V., Vachkova, R., Tzoneva, M., and Kappas, A. Genotoxic activity of benonyl in different test systems. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 16: 32-36 (1990). 28. Kappas, A. The genotoxicity of benomyl. In: Environmental Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis (A. Kappas, Ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1981, pp. 59-67.