Does Soybean Genetics Affect Soybean Aphid/Virus Management? Craig Grau, Emily Mueller, Nancy Kurtzweil, Bob Ellingson and David Hogg Depts. of Plant Pathology and Entomology University of Wisconsin Madison
Yield Response to Insecticides 0-20 bu/a No insecticide Insecticide Yield response Proportion due to direct aphid control?? Proportion due reduced virus transmission??
Do Soybean Varieties Differ in Response to the Soybean Aphid? Aphid density per plant Leaf distortion & Sooty mold
Plant Responses to Insects Susceptible Support high insect reproduction Severe feeding damage Resistance Antibiosis Support none to low insect reproduction Chemical toxicity Antixenosis (nonpreference) Low numbers of insects per plant Not attracted to, or avoid plant Tolerance May have high numbers of insects per plant Vegetative growth and yield less compromised
Response of Soybean Varieties to the Soybean Aphid in Greenhouse and Field Environments 1600 Number of aphids/plant 300 250 200 150 100 Greenhouse 225.4 151.1 Number of Aphids (per plant) 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 NE2701 NE3001 COLFAX Field 7/9 7/15 7/21 7/28 8/4 8/11 8/19 8/25 117.3 50 0 NE3001 COLFAX NE2701
Response of Soybean Accessions to the Soybean Aphid in Biotron and Field 1550 1350 Field Number of aphids/plant 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 Greenhouse 320 Number of aphids/plant 1150 950 750 550 350 150-50 151.1 7/21 7/28 8/4 8/11 8/19 8/25 PI 548-445 PI 71506 PI 548-657 BSR101 COLFAX 50 0 38.7 21.5 12.1 BSR101 Colfax PI 71506 PI 548-657 PI 548-445
Soybean Lines Differ in Yield Response to Insecticides Tolerant Soybean Lines 45 42 Yield increase- % 40 35 30 25 20 15 36 25 23 No. aphids/plant R2 Spansoy 250-1406 AR16-1862 153283-982 M94-209136 - 1576 90753-1267 BSR101 (S) 1307 10 5 0 Spansoy 250 Arlington Ag. Research Station - 2003 AR 16 153282 M94-209136 Soybean Accessions 0 0 90753 BSR 101
Summary of Soybean Genetics and Soybean Aphid High level of resistance discovered Varieties adapted to Southern USA Not found in Northern soybean germplasm Less susceptible varieties identified Tolerant varieties identified; not responsive to insecticides No yield response to insecticide may be related to soybean variety
Major Public and Private Soybean Breeding Programs are Attempting to Develop Varieties Resistant to the Soybean Aphid Experimental Line Experimental Line
Soybean Aphid and Transmitted Viruses Soybean mosaic virus, Alfalfa mosaic virus SMV AMV Aphids Mottled Seed - SMV Green Stem SMV
Incidence of Soybean mosaic virus and Alfalfa mosaic virus by Location and Year % Incidence 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Arl Rock 55 40 21 21 24 16 17 8 0 7 1 1 SMV AMV SMV AMV SMV AMV 2000 2001 2002
Control of Soybean Viruses Genetic resistance to viruses Few varieties available; high resistance Tolerant varieties likely exist Control virus transmitting aphids By insecticides? By genetic resistance to aphids?
Performance of Soybean Varieties in the Presence of Soybean Aphids and Viruses Wisconsin - 2003 Yield Symptom Seed Mottle Bu/a Severity % Variety % Colfax (R) 60.0 5 2 NE3001 (R) 49.9 5 8 IA2008R (S) 37.2 40 65 LSD p=10% 8 27 24 R = resistant; S = Susceptible to Soybean mosaic virus
Insecticides and SMV Transmission 2002: Low Aphid Populations % virus incidence 60 50 40 30 20 10 No treatment Warrior Yield: insecticide 54.4 bu/a no insecticide 47.9 bu/a 0 R4 R5 R6 Growth stage
Does Soybean Aphid Density Associated with Varieties Relate to Virus Transmission? Susceptible to soybean aphid Greater virus infection?? Partial resistance to soybean aphid Less virus infection??
Performance of Soybean Lines in the Presence of Soybean Aphids and Viruses UW-Line Aphid Rating 0-5 Virus Severity % Seed Mottle % W02-176 1 2 1 W02-552 1.5 75 65 W02-152 4.5 65 60 W02-120 5 10 80 Aphid Rating: 0 = no aphids; 3 = moderate aphids; 5 = high aphids and symptoms
Summary of Soybean Virus Control Genetic resistance to viruses most effective Control of soybean aphid Insecticides slow virus epidemics if aphid populations are low Soybean lines; aphid population densities not consistently related to virus infection High aphid; high virus Low aphid; both high and low virus symptoms Possible to select low aphid and low virus lines Must be co-selected
Conclusions Soybean lines differ in response to soybean aphid Reproduction and symptoms (resistance) Yield response to insecticides (tolerance) Commercial varieties to be evaluated Soybean lines differ in response to viruses transmitted by soybean aphid (resistance to virus) Incidence of infected plants Symptoms caused by viruses Leaves Mottled seed
Aphid Density Associated with Soybean Lines not Consistently Related to Virus Symptoms Susceptible to aphid Usually severe virus Soybean response to viruses Virus resistance genes most effective Less consistent virus control associated with aphid population densities Breeding issues Partial Resistance to aphid High and low virus severity
Conclusions No yield response to insecticide may be related to aphid tolerant soybean variety high incidence of virus infection negating benefit of aphid control by insecticides
Research Funding Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board North Central Soybean Research Program USDA North Central IPM Program College of Agriculture & Life Sciences UW-Madison