Efficacy of a single-dose ondansetron for preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting

Similar documents
Management of post-strabismus nausea and vomiting in children using ondansetron: a value-based comparison of outcomes 1^

Dhawal R. Wadaskar*, Jyoti S. Magar, Bharati A. Tendolkar

The Journal of International Medical Research 2011; 39:

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study was carried out in the USA.

Is lorazepam effective at preventing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomized controlled trial

Dexamethasone Compared with Metoclopramide in Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Orthognathic Surgery

ISPUB.COM. A Wadaskar, N Swarnkar, A Yadav INTRODUCTION METHODS

DEXAMETHASONE WITH EITHER GRANISETRON OR ONDANSETRON FOR POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

A Comparative Clinical Study Of Prevention Of PostOperative Nausea And Vomiting Using Granisetron And

Palonosetron vs Ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in...

Research Article. Shital S. Ahire 1 *, Shweta Mhambrey 1, Sambharana Nayak 2. Received: 22 July 2016 Accepted: 08 August 2016

Dexamethasone combined with other antiemetics for prophylaxis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

JMSCR Vol 07 Issue 04 Page April 2019

Post-operative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: comparison between propofol and sevoflurane

IJMDS January 2017; 6(1) Dr Robina Makker Associate professor 2 Dr Amit Bhardwaj

Remifentanil. Addressing the challenges of ambulatory orthopedic procedures 1-3

Efficacy of palonosetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

KEYWORDS Obstetric Patient, Spinal Anesthesia, PONV (Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting), Inj. Metoclopramide, Inj. Ondansetron.

As laparoscopic surgeries are gaining popularity, Original Article. Maharjan SK 1, Shrestha S 2 1. Introduction

Antiemetic in Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: new option

ISSN X (Print) India. *Corresponding author Dr. D. Shiva Prasad

A comparative study of the antiemetic efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and metoclopramide in patients undergoing gynecological surgery

Pre-medication with controlled-release oxycodone in the management of postoperative pain after ambulatory laparoscopic gynaecological surgery

Clinical Study Effective Dose of Ramosetron for Prophylaxis of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in High-Risk Patients

Satisfactory Analgesia Minimal Emesis in Day Surgeries. (SAME-Day study) A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Morphine and Hydromorphone

Section: Anaesthesia. Original Article INTRODUCTION

Reply to the Joint Editors-in-Chief Request for Determination Regarding Papers Published by Dr. Yoshitaka Fujii, dated April 9, 2012

Setting The setting was a hospital (tertiary care). The economic study was carried out in Ankara, Turkey.

Evaluation of Postoperative Complications Occurring in Patients after Desflurane or Sevoflurane in Outpatient Anaesthesia: A Comparative Study

Antiemetic Effect Of Propofol Administered At The End Of Surgery

Dexamethasone Compared with Metoclopramide in Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Orthognathic Surgery

Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Routes for Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

problems with, 29, 98 psychiatric patients, 96 rheumatic conditions, 97

RETRACTED ARTICLE. Antiemetic effects of granisetron on postoperative. vomiting in patients with and without motion sickness

American Journal of Oral Medicine and Radiology

The Comparison Effect of Preoperative Ondansetron and Metoclopramide in Reducing Nausea and Vomitting after Loparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Is Intravenous Ramosetron 0.3 mg Effective In The Prevention Of Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting In Women Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery?

Oral Midazolam for Premedication in Children Undergoing Various Elective Surgical procedures

ORIGINALARTICLE. Semira*, Zaffar Abbas*, Vishal R.Tandon**, Amina Bashir*, Kirpal Kour*** Introduction JK SCIENCE

Neostigmine as an adjunct to Bupivacaine, for caudal block in burned children, undergoing skin grafting of the lower extremities

Alizaprideand ondansetronin the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled

LOW DOSE INTRAVENOUS MIDAZOLAM FOR PREVENTION OF PONV, IN LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERY

COBISS.SR-ID EFFECTIVNESS OF DEXAMETASONE VS. MAGNESIUM SULPHATE IN POSTOPERA- TIVE ANALGESIA (DEXAMETASONE VS. MAGNESIUM SULPHATE)

A comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil for fast-track cardiac anesthesia Engoren M, Luther G, Fenn-Buderer N

COMPARISON OF INDUCTION WITH SEVOFLURANE-FENTANYL AND PROPOFOL-FENTANYL ON POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

V. Nesek-Adam, 1 E. Grizelj-Stojcˇic, 1 Zˇ. Rasˇic, 2 Z. Cˇala, 2 V. Mrsˇic, 1 A. Smiljanić 1

Comparison of Hemodynamic, Emergence and Recov Ery Characteristics of Sevoflurane with Desflurane in General Anesthesia

Type of intervention Anaesthesia. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

Comparison of remifentanil versus fentanyl general anesthesia for short outpatient urologic procedures

J Med Assoc Thai 2016; 99 (5): Full text. e-journal:

Antiemetic and analgesic-sparing effects of diphenhydramine added to morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia

Setting The setting was tertiary care. The economic study appears to have been performed in Heidelberg, Germany.

Won-Suk Lee 1, Kwang-Beom Lee 2, Soyi Lim 2 and Young Gin Chang 3*

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:

Comparison of Drugs and Intravenous Crystalloid in Reduction of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Laparoscopic Surgery

Antiemetic Prophylaxis for Office-based Surgery

Ondansetron, a selective blocking agent of the. Timing of ondansetron administration to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting

IJBCP International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology

The effect of duration of dose delivery with patient-controlled analgesia on the incidence of nausea and vomiting after hysterectomy

LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF FIXED PATIENT FACTORS FOR POSTOPERATIVE SICKNESS: A MODEL FOR RISK ASSESSMENT

The Effect of Morphine on the Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Strabismus Surgery with Propofol

Effects of IV Ondansetron during spinal anaesthesia with Ropivacaine and Fentanyl

Measure Abbreviation: PONV 01 (MIPS 430)

Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Ambulatory Surgery The Big Little Problem

Awake regional versus general anesthesia in preterms and ex-preterm infants for herniotomy

Prevention CINV (highly emetogenic) Prevention PONV

A randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting in ophthalmic surgeries

Eun Jin Ahn, 1 Geun Joo Choi, 2 Hyun Kang, 2 Chong Wha Baek, 2 Yong Hun Jung, 2 and Young Cheol Woo Introduction. 2. Materials and Methods

Editor s key points. M. S. Green*, P. Green, S. N. Malayaman, M. Hepler, L. J. Neubert and J. C. Horrow

Measure Abbreviation: PONV 01 (MIPS 430)

Combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting

The Sparing Effect of Low-dose Esmolol on Sevoflurane during Laparoscopic Gynaecological Surgery

Bispectral index (Bis) guided comparison of control of haemodynamic responses by fentanyl and butorphanol during tracheal intubation in neurosurgical

Original Article Antiemetics in Prolong Surgeries Pak Armed Forces Med J 2015; 65(3):353-57

Nausea and vomiting after surgery

ABHINAV NATIONAL MONTHLY REFEREED JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Low-dose Granisetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION

Intravenous narcotics for premedication in outpatient anaesthesia

NQS Domain: Patient Safety. Measure Type: Process

Opioid Free Anesthesia

Antiemetic Prophylaxis with Ondansetron or Granisetron in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

PONV in Ambulatory surgery: A comparison between Ramosetron and Ondansetron: a prospective, double-blinded, and randomized controlled study

P V Praveen Kumar 1*, P. Archana 2. Original Research Article. Abstract

MD (Anaesthesiology) Title (Plan of Thesis) (Session )

The Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland. Guidelines on the Prevention of Post-operative Vomiting in Children

Efficacy of Prophylactic Ondansetron in a Patient-controlled Analgesia Environment

Effect of Intraoperative Dextrose Infusion for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Diagnostic Gynecologic Laparoscopy

Abstract. Introduction

EFFICACY OF ORALLY ADMINISTERED ONDANSETRON IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING: A DOSE RANGING STUDY

MD (Anaesthesiology) Title (Plan of Thesis) (Session )

ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF SMALL DOSES OF PROPOFOL FOLLOWING MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY Purneema K 1, Jyothi Mallikarjuna 2

Effect of Ketorolac on Pain Scores and Length of Stay in Post Anaesthetic Care Unit after Major Abdominal Surgery

Materials and Methods

FENTANYL BY CONSTANT RATE I.V. INFUSION FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA

Evaluation of Three 5-HT 3

STUDY OF ANALGESIC-NALBUPHINE AS A COMPONENT OF BALANCED ANAESTHESIA IN OTOLARYNGORHINOLOGICAL SURGERY

Anesthesiology, V 91, No 6, Dec 1999

Effect of preoperative oral amantadine on intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements in female patients during abdominoplasty

Transcription:

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2001; 5: 59-63 Efficacy of a single-dose ondansetron for preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with sevoflurane and remifentanil infusion anaesthesia S. PAVENTI, A. SANTEVECCHI, R. RANIERI Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Rome (Italy) Abstract. In this randomized study we compared the efficacy of ondansetron 4 mg with ondansetron 8 mg for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with sevoflurane and remifentanil infusion anaesthesia. Sixty patients were randomized to receive ondansetron 8 mg (30 pts) or ondansetron 4 mg (30 pts) before the induction of anaesthesia with thiopental and remifentanil. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (0.5 MAC), oxygen and remifentanil infusion (0.25, 0.35, 0.5 µg/kg/min). Postoperative analgesia was provided by intravenous ketorolac 60 mg. The incidence of PONV, the pain score, and the analgesic requirement were recorded for 24 hours. There was no difference among groups in patient characteristics, risk factors for PONV, or side effects. During the first 6 h postoperatively, the incidence of PONV after ondansetron 4 mg and 8 mg were similar (p < 0.001). After 6 h the incidence of PONV increased significantly in patients who had received ondansetron 4 mg (p = 0.01) and was greater than that in patients who had received ondansetron 8 mg (p = 0.001). We conclude that single-dose ondansetron 8 mg is more effective than ondansetron 4 mg in the prevention of PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. A single dose of IV ondansetron 8 mg is well tolerated and decrease the number of nausea and vomiting episodes after surgery. Key Words: PONV, Remifentanil, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Anaesthesia. Introduction Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with shorter post-operative hospital stay, less post-operative pain, and has become a widely used surgical technique 1,2. It has been reported that the incidence of nausea and vomiting is as high as 25-72% following laparoscopic cholecystectomy 3,4. Ondansetron is a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist with potent antiemetic activities. Its elimination half-time is 3.2-3.9 hours and a single dose of ondansetron may provide prolonged antiemetic effects. Ondansetron is effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and orthopedic, gynecologic, thyroid, and ophtalmic surgery. The recommended dose for PONV prophylaxis is a single 4-mg bolus of IV ondansetron 5. However the emetic stimuli after surgery may be conditioned also by the anaesthetic drugs used and by the respective doses, so in randomized study we compared the efficacy and safety of ondansetron 4 mg with ondansetron 8 mg for the prevention of PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with sevoflurane and remifentanil infusion anaesthesia. Methods The study was approved by the our clinical research Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. We studied 60 patients submitted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (32 male, 28 female; mean age 44 ± 9 years). All patients were ASA physical status I or II. Patients were ex- 59

S. Paventi, A. Santevecchi, R. Ranieri cluded if they had preexisting nausea or vomiting or had received opioids or drugs with known antiemetic properties in the 24 hours before surgery. Patients with a history of esophageal reflux or opiod or alcohol abuse were also excluded. All patients were interviewed during the preoperative assessment. A history of motion sickness and PONV was noted. Preoperative electrocardiogram, full blood counts and renal and liver function test were performed. The patients were premedicated with diazepam and fasted from midnight before surgery. In the operating room, routine monitoring was applied. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either ondansetron 8 mg or ondansetron 4 mg. Study drugs were prepared by an anaesthesiologist not otherwise involved in the study and were injected IV over 30 s. Arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded noninvasively every 5 minutes. Adverse reactions, including pain on injection, signs of allergy, dizziness, and chest or abdominal discomforts, were specially sought. Anaesthesia was induced with remifentanil 1 µg/kg and thiopental 3-5 mg/kg. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg was administrated to facilitate tracheal intubation. All the patients were ventilated with a mixture O 2 and air (FiO 2 50%) and a respiratoriy rate of 12-15 with ETCO 2 about 35 mmhg. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane at end-tidal 1.1% and remifentanil infusion. The patients were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups to receive a maintenance infusion rate of 0.25 µg/kg/min, 0.35 µg/kg/min and 0.5 µg/kg/min. Perioperative analgesia was provided by IV ketorolac 60 mg administered before the end of the surgery. At the end of surgery, anaesthesia was discontinued and residual neuromuscolar blockade was antagonized by using neostigmine (0.04 mg/kg) and atropine (0.02 mg/kg). The trachea was extubated when the patient became fully awake. Anaesthetic time was defined as the start of the induction to the time when sevoflurane and remifentanil was discontinued. The subsequent period until the patient responded to verbal command was recorded as the recovery time. Postoperatively all patients were monitored in the postanaesthesia care unit for 1 hour, after which time the patient returned to the ward. The incidence of nausea and emetic episodes (retching or vomiting), as well as the severity of nausea, pain, and sedation were recorded at 30-min intervals for 2 hours and then every 6 hours for the next 24 hours. Patients interviews were conducted in a standardized fashion by trained nurses who were blinded to the study drug. Retching or vomiting separated by at least 1 min was considered as separate emetic episodes. Adverse reactions were also recorded. Preoperative laboratory tests and electrocardiogram were repeated at 24 h. Data Analysis Categorical data were compared among groups using χ 2 analysis, and continuous data were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Intergroup differences were compared by using Fisher's exact test or the Mann- Whitney U-test. Severity of nausea during the initial 6 h was assessed by adding the nausea scores at 2h and 6 h postoperatively. Similarly the sum of the nausea scores at 12 h and 18 h indicated the severity 6-18 h postoperatively. The aggregate totals during these two periods were then compared among groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test. A complete response was defined as no nausea, emetic episodes, or rescue antiemetic during the entire 48 h observation. The time to the first nausea or emetic episode was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and was compared among groups using the log-rank test. The effects of variables that may influence the incidence of PONV were analyzed by Cox regression. A paired t-test was used to compare the hemodynamic variables before and after injection of the study drugs. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Age, weight, height and variables that may influence PONV did not differ among the groups. A complete response was observed in 36.6% of patients in the ondansetron 4 mg group (p = 0.001) and in 86.6% of the ondansetron 8 mg group (p < 0.001). The medi- 60

Efficacy of a single-dose ondansetron for preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting an time to the first PONV episode was shorter in the ondansetron 4 mg group 12 (9-22.5) hours (p < 0.001) compared with that in the ondansetron 8 mg group, > 18 hours (p < 0.001). Both ondansetron 4 and 8 mg were effective in preventing emesis during the first 12 hours (p < 0.001). The incidence of emesis in patients who received ondansetron 4 mg increased significantly 6-18 h post-operatively compared with the initial 6 h (p <0.01). In these 12 h, there were more emetic episodes in the ondansetron 4 mg compared with the ondansetron 8 mg group (p < 0.001). Rare and not significant emetic episodes among groups were recorded after the first postoperative day (Table I). Nausea was also common during the first 20 h after surgery, but the overall severity was low. In the first 6 hours after surgery the median (range) aggregated nausea score in the ondansetron 4mg group, 6 (0-13), was significantly greater than that in the ondansetron 8 mg group, 0 (0-11) (p < 0.001). Despite an increase in the incidence of nausea score in the ondansetron 4 mg group remained low, 0 (0-18). This was similar to the score in the ondansetron 8 mg group, 0 (0-15) (p = 0.15). During the entire 24-h study period, 3 patients who received ondansetron 4 mg (p = 0.02) and 1 of the 8 mg group (n=1; p < 0.001), required a rescue antiemetics therapy (methoclopramide 10 mg i.v.). Furthermore, 1 of the patients in the ondansetron 4 mg group who required rescue antiemetics continued to experience PONV and received 2 or more rescue treatments, whereas none in 8 mg group required a second dose. There was no difference in pain scores among the groups. There was no adverse events during the injection of ondansetron. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate did not change after drug administration. Biochemical test were not different from preoperative values. One patient in the ondansetron 4 mg group complained of dizziness and an another in the same group had a mild headache during the early postoperative hours. No other adverse effects was noted. Discussion Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy have a relatively high incidence of PONV (25-72%) 4. This problem is multifactorial in origin, including the patient demographics, the nature of the underlying disease, the duration of surgery, anaesthetic technique and post-operative care 6. The main patient-related factors are age, sex, obesity, and history of motion sickness and/or previous PONV. Surgical factors also include the effects of intraperitoneal CO 2 insufflation on residual stretching and irritation of the peritoneum 7. In our randomized trial, however, the treatment groups were comparables with respect to patient demography, type of surgery, anaesthetic drugs administered and ketorolac used postoperatively. Therefore, the difference in the incidence of PONV in the groups is likely due to the differences in the dose of agents administered. We administered ondansetron immediately before the induction of anesthesia to maximize its potential preemptive antiemetic Table I. Incidence of PONV during 24 hours for each study group. Time Drug 0.25 µg/kg/min 0.35 µg/kg/min 0.50 µg/kg/min 0-2 hours Ondansetron 4 mg 1 pt* 1 pt* 1 pt* 8 mg None* None* 1 pt* 2-6 hours Ondansetron 4 mg 2 pts* 1 pt* None* 8 mg None* None* None* 6-12 hours Ondansetron 4 mg 1 pt* 2 pts* 1 pt* 8 mg None* 1 pt * None* 12-18 hours Ondansetron 4 mg 1 pt 1 pt 1 pt 8 mg 1 pt 1 pt 1 pt 18-24 hours Ondansetron 4 mg None None None 8 mg 1 pt 1 pt None * p < 0.001; p < 0.01. 61

S. Paventi, A. Santevecchi, R. Ranieri effect. Scuderi and coll. 2 demonstrated that there is a difference in outcomes when routine antiemetic medication with ondansetron is administrated versus simply treating PONV when the symptoms occur. Moreover, Scholz and coll. 8 demonstrated that the ondansetron reduces the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy as well as major gynaecological surgery. The precise mechanism of action of ondansetron in the reduction of the incidence of PONV is not known, but it has been suggested that it may act on sites containing 5-HT3 receptors with demonstrated anti-emetic effects. Our data do not support the use of a smaller dose of ondansetron for PONV. The antiemetic effect of the ondansetron 4 mg was shorter than that of ondansetron 8 mg. A single IV dose of ondansetron 4 mg failed to decrease the incidence of PONV 6 h postoperatively. In our study the ondansetron 8 mg is the dose effective to reduce and/or get rid off PONV. In fact, complete response was observed in the ondansetron 8 mg study group (86.6%) and 4 mg group (36.6%). The study also showed that only 1 patient of 8 mg group required rescue antiemetics compared with 3 patients of 4 mg group. Furthermore, 1 of the 3 patients in the ondansetron 4 mg group who required rescue antiemetics continued to experience PONV and received 2 or more rescue treatments, whereas none in 8 mg group required a second dose. Ondansetron lacks the sedative, dysphoric and extrapyramidal symptoms associated with other antiemetics, such as droperidol and metoclopramide 8. In this study, there were no differences in the incidence of headache and dizziness among the 4 mg groups and 8 mg group. Unlike other antiemetics, ondansetron does not affect mental status to produce these symptoms. The use of N 2 O during laparoscopic procedures has been considered to be an important problem because of its ability to produce bowel distension during the surgery and to increase the incidence of PONV 9. Recently some authors have found no differences between the groups receiving air and N 2 O with respect to the operating conditions, bowel distension or the incidence of PONV 10. Nevertheless, in our study we use Sevoflurane as an adjuvant anaesthetic associated with infusion of Remifentanil. Remifentanil is a m-opioid receptor agonist with a context sensitive half-time of 3 min and an elimination half-time 10 min. Because of its unique metabolic pathway among this group of drugs, remifentanil represents a new pharmacokinetics class of opioids which is named esterase metabolized opioid (EMO). Rapid biotransformation to minimally active metabolites should be associated with a short, predictable duration of action with no accumulation of effects on repeated dosing or with continuous infusion. Remifentanil infusion is associated with an age-related reduction in the MAC of isoflurane in humans 11. Nausea and vomiting may be consequences of remifentanil administration. However, because of its rapid clearance, the incidence of these side effects prove to be less compared with other opioids in some situations. The our study shows an incidence of PONV due to remifentanil, associated with laparoscopic surgery related with an high prevalence of PONV, lower than showed in others studies (14% vs 52% Glaxo-Wellcome studies). In conclusion we have shown that ondansetron 8 mg is the minimum effective dose for preventing PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with sevoflurane and remifentanil anaesthesia. References 1) ROSE DK, COHEN MM, SOUTTER DI. Laparoscopic cholecistectomy: the anaesthesist's point of view. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: 809-815. 2) SCUDERI PE, JAMES RL, HARRIS L, MIMS GR. Antiemetic prophylaxis does not improve outcomes after outpatient surgery when compared to symptomatic treatment. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 360-371. 3) FUJII Y, SAITO Y, TANAKA H, TOYOOKA H. Anti emetic efficacy of prophylactic granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecistectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Anaesth 1998;15: 166-171. 4) STANTON JM. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecistectomy. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 317 (correspondence). 5) MARKHAM A, SORKIN EM. Ondansetron: an up to date of its therapeutic use in chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs 1993; 45: 931-952. 62

Efficacy of a single-dose ondansetron for preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting 6) WATCHA M, WHITE PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Its etiology, treatment, and prevention. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 162-184. 7) FUJII Y, SAITO Y, TANAKA H, TOYOOKA H. Effective dose of granisetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecistectomy. Eur J Anaesth 1998; 15: 287-291. 8) SCHOLZ J, HENNES J, STEINFATH M, FARBER L, SCHWEIGER C, DICK W, Schulte am Esch J. Tropisetron or ondansetron compared with placebo for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Eur J Anaesth 1998; 15: 676-685. 9) LONIE DS, HARPER NJN. Nitrous oxide, anaesthesia and vomiting: the effect of nitrous oxide anaesthesia on the incidence of vomiting following gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesthesia 1986; 41: 703-707. 10) TAYLOR E, FEINSTEIN R, WHITE PF, SOPER N. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecistectomy. Is nitrous oxide contraindicated? Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 541-543. 11) KAPILA A, LANG E, GLASS P, SEBEL P, S HLUGMAN D, HILL A, WOOD M, BATENHORST R, GOODMAN D. MAC reduction of isoflurane by remifentanil. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: A378. 63