Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Treatment of Resistant Hypertension: 18-Month Results from the Symplicity HTN-2 Randomized Controlled Trial Prof Murray Esler Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne On behalf of Henry Krum, Markus Schlaich, Roland Schmieder, Michael Böhm, Paul Sobotka and the Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators
Disclaimer Speaker is the Chief Investigator of the multi-centre randomized international trial of therapeutic endovascular renal denervation with the Symplicity renal denervation system in drugresistant hypertension (HTN-2 trial), and is a recipient of research grant, travel and consultancy funding from Medtronic and Ardian Inc. He holds no stock or shares in either company, or patent rights for renal denervation.
Differentiation of Treatment- Uncontrolled Hypertension Resistant Hypertension Patients who lack BP control including 1 Inadequate treatment regimens Poor adherence Undetected secondary hypertension True treatment resistance Controlled Hypertension Patients who achieve current BP control rates of SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP <90 mm Hg (or lower if there are other complications) 2 Treatment-Resistant Hypertension BP remains above goal with 3 antihypertensive medications 1,3 Therapeutic plan should include lifestyle measures 3 BP controlled but requires 4 antihypertensive medications 1 BP=blood pressure; DBP=diastolic blood pressure; SBP=systolic blood pressure. 1. Calhoun DA et al. Circulation. 2008;117:e510-e526; 2. Chobanian AV et al. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206-1252; 3. Mancia G et al. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1462-1536.
Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Nerve Ablation Standard interventional technique 4-6 two-minute treatments per artery Proprietary RF Generator Automated Low-power Built-in safety algorithms
Activation of the Renal Sympathetic Nerves in Patients with Essential Hypertension 1 400 Rate of spillover of noradrenaline from the kidneys to plasma (ng/min) 300 200 100 ** * 0 Normal BP 20-39 40-59 60-79 Age (yrs) Essential Hypertension Renal Denervation Delays or Prevents Development of Many Experimental Forms of Hypertension 2 1. M Esler, G Lambert, G Jennings J Hypertension 1990;8: S53-S57 (Updated) 2. G F DiBona Physiol Rev 1997;77:75-197
Participating Centers: HTN-2 Randomized Controlled Trial Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes Homburg, Germany (Michael Böhm) CardioVascular Center Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany (Horst Sievert) Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany (Lars Christian Rump) Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen, Germany (Roland Schmieder) Barts and The London London, UK (Mel Lobo) Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital Riga, Latvia (Andrejs Erglis) L'Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou Paris, France (Guillaume Bobrie) John Hunter Hospital Newcastle, Australia (Suku Thambar) Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Brussels, Belgium (Alexandre Persu) Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck, Germany (Heribert Schunkert) Universität zu Köln Köln, Germany (Uta Hoppe) The Alfred Hospital Melbourne, Australia (Henry Krum) Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators. Lancet. 2010;376:1903-1909. Universität Leipzig Herzzentrum Leipzig, Germany (Dierk Scheinert) Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien Vienna, Austria (Thomas Binder) Samodzielna Pracownia Hemodynamiczna Warsaw, Poland (Andrzej Januszewicz & Adam Witkowski) Hospital 12 de Octubre Madrid, Spain (Luis Ruilope) St. Vincent s Hospital Melbourne, Australia (Robert Whitbourn) Universitätsklinikum Essen Essen, Germany (Heike Bruck) Kent and Canterbury Hospital Canterbury, UK (Mark Downes) University Hospital Zurich Zurich, Switzerland (Thomas Lüscher) University of Glasgow Glasgow, UK (Alan Jardine) Auckland City Hospital Auckland, New Zealand (Mark Webster) Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen Bad Krozingen, Germany (Thomas Zeller) The John Paul II Hospital Krakow, Poland (Jerzy Sadowski)
Patient Population Inclusion Criteria: o Office SBP 160 mmhg ( 150 mmhg with type II diabetes mellitus) o Stable drug regimen of 3+ more anti-htn medications o Age 18-85 years Exclusion Criteria: o Hemodynamically or anatomically significant renal artery abnormalities or prior renal artery intervention o egfr <45 ml/min/1.73m 2 (MDRD formula) o Type 1 diabetes mellitus o Stenotic valvular heart disease for which reduction of BP would be hazardous o MI, unstable angina, or CVA in the prior 6 months Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators. Lancet. 2010;376:1903-1909.
Patient Disposition Screening Assessed for Eligibility (n=190) Randomized (n=106) Excluded During Screening, (n=84) BP < 160 at Baseline Visit (after 2-weeks of medication compliance confirmation) (n=36; 19%) Ineligible anatomy (n=30; 16%) Declined participation (n=10; 5%) Other exclusion criteria discovered after consent (n=8; 4%) 6-month Primary End-Point Allocated to RDN n=52 Treated; n=49 Analyzable 6-month Per Protocol Post RDN (Crossover) n=35 Allocated to Control n=54 Control; n=51 Analyzable Crossover n=46 Not-Per Protocol*, (Crossover) n=9 12-month Post RDN 12-month Post RDN n=47 12-month Post RDN (Crossover) n=33 18-month Post RDN 18-month Post RDN n=43 18-month Post RDN (Crossover) n=31 * Crossed-over with ineligible BP (<160 mmhg)
Symplicity HTN-2 Pre-Procedure Demographics RDN (n=49) Cross-Over (n=37) Office Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg) 178.2 ± 17.1 190.9 ± 19.6 Office Diastolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg) 97.0 ± 15.8 101.4 ± 16.2 Age, years 58.2 ± 11.9 57.3 ± 13.1 Gender (% female) 34.6% 59.5% Race (% Caucasian) 98.1% 97.3% BMI 30.9 ± 5.1 31.1 ± 5.4 Type II DM 40.4% 29.7% CAD 19.2% 5.4% Heart Rate (bpm) 75 ± 15 73 ± 15 Standard deviations are presented unless otherwise specified
Pre-Procedure Medication By Class % usage Renal Denervation Group Crossover Group (n=35) P value (n=49) ACE inhibitor 51.0% (25/49) 48.6% (17/35) 1.000 Angiotensin Receptor blocker 67.3% (33/49) 82.9% (29/35) 0.136 Calcium Channel blocker 77.6% (38/49) 77.1% (27/35) 1.000 Diuretic 89.8% (44/49) 91.4% (32/35) 1.000 Aldosterone antagonists 18.4% (9/49) 22.9% (8/35) 0.784 Centrally-acting sympatholytics 51.0% (25/49) 42.9% (15/35) 0.511 Direct renin inhibitors 16.3% (8/49) 22.9% (8/35) 0.575 Beta blockers 81.6% (40/49) 62.9% (22/35) 0.078 Alpha-adrenergic blocker 8.2% (4/49) 2.9% (1/35) 0.396 Direct-acting vasodilators 8.2% (4/49) 2.9% (1/35) 0.396
Systolic BP (mmhg) Office BP 18 months Post Procedure 220 Randomization Primary Endpoint reached* 183 (n = 54) 191 (n = 37) 180 178 (n = 52) 166 (n = 35) 167 (n = 33) 162 (n = 31) 147 (n = 49) 151 (n = 47) 145 (n = 43) 140 100 Baseline *Patients randomized to control were offered RDN following the primary endpoint assessment. Only patients still meeting entry criteria (SBP 160 mmhg) were included in this analysis (n=37)
(mm Hg) (mm Hg) 10 0 Change in Office Blood Pressure Through 18 Months* RDN Group 10 0 Crossover Group -10-12 -10-12 -10-8 -10-11 -20 Series1 SBP Series2 DBP -20 Series1 SBP Series2 DBP -24-24 -30-28 -30-28 -32-32 -40-40 -50 6 month N=49 12 months N=47 18 months N=43-50 6 months N=35 P-values < 0.01 at each time point compared to pre procedure values for each group *Post Procedure follow up 12 months N=33 18 months N=31
Renal Function Over Time 100 80 RDN egfr* 76,7 77,1 78,2 100 80 Crossover egfr* 88,6 85,2 81,2 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 Pre Procedure (n=52) *egfr ml/min/1.73m 2 6 months (n=49) 12 months (n=45) 0 Pre Procedure (n=37) 6 months (n=35) Renal function parameters were not obtained beyond 12 months follow up 12 months (n=31)
mm Hg Change in Pulse Pressure Post Procedure 0 6 months 12 months 18 months -5-10 RDN* -15-15,3-13,8 Crossover* -20-19,9-18,3-19,8-17,6-25 N=49 N=35 N=47 N=33 N=43 N=31 *P<.01 from pre procedure values at all time points
BPM Heart Rate Over Time 76 74 72 70 68 66 64 62 60 75 72 Pre Procedure 70 70 68 6 m Post Procedure 65 12 m Post Procedure 68 68 18 m Post Procedure RDN group* Crossover Group *p <.01 (6, 12m), p=.02 (18m) p=ns (6, 18m), p<.01 (12m) All p-values at each time point are compared to pre procedure HR
Medication Change Analysis to 18 Months Post Procedure 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 6 M (n=76) 12 M (n=76) 18 M (n=73) Physicians were allowed to change medication following the 6-month primary endpoint Reasons for medication changes were unknown and may be related to a variety of confounding factors Increase: if both meds/dose increase, or if meds no change and dose increase, or if dose no change and meds increase; Decrease: if both meds/dose decrease, or if meds no change and dose decrease, or if dose no change and meds decrease; Indeterminate: All other combinations
Safety Update: 12 to 18 months Post Procedure 3 hypertensive events requiring hospitalization in the initially treated group 1 hypotensive event which required hospitalization 1 mild transient acute renal failure o Admitted with elevated K +, meds temporarily d/c d (Co- Amilofruse, perindopril, metformin). IV fluids administered; K + decreased. Patient discharged and remained off perindopril. 2 deaths unrelated to the device or therapy No clinically significant changes in egfr compared to pre procedure values and no renal vascular events reported
Conclusions Subjects in both groups had blood pressure reductions which were significant and sustained through 18 months of follow up Physicians were allowed to change medications following the 6-month primary endpoint. Reasons for changes were mostly unknown but may be related to a variety of confounding factors Pulse pressure improved and heart rate was stable or dropped following treatment with the Symplicity renal denervation system At 18 months follow-up there are no device-related serious adverse effects and no detrimental effects on the renal vasculature following treatment