Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services Client Demographics and Treatment Outcomes

Similar documents
CalOMS Admission. Page 1 of 6

FACT SHEET. Women in Treatment

CalOMS Admission Form Instructions

Alcohol Users in Treatment

CalOMS Discharge Form Instructions

Outlook and Outcomes Fiscal Year 2011

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Contra Costa County 2010

DESCRIPTION OF FOLLOW-UP SAMPLE AT INTAKE SECTION TWO

Santa Clara County 2010

REVISED. Stanislaus County 2007

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Riverside County 2010

Stanislaus County 2010

El Dorado County 2010

San Francisco County 2010

San Bernardino County 2010

San Joaquin County 2010

REVISED. Tulare County 2007

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Mendocino County 2010

REVISED. Humboldt County 2007

San Luis Obispo County 2010

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

ALCOHOL AND DRUG TREATMENT SERVICES. Provided by the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Division (ADAD) Hawaiʻi Department of Health

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

REVISED. Inyo County 2007

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Alcohol and Drug Treatment Services

State of Iowa Outcomes Monitoring System

State of Iowa Outcomes Monitoring System

New Jersey Department of Human Services Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services Substance Abuse Treatment State Performance Report

New Jersey Department of Health Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services Substance Abuse Treatment State Performance Report

LUCAS COUNTY TASC, INC. OUTCOME ANALYSIS

Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy. Full Service Partnership Outcomes Report

Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program

If so, when: Demographic Information Male Transgender Height: Weight: Massachusetts Resident? Primary Language: Are you currently homeless?

Special Report Iowa Injection Drug Use Admissions to Treatment: 2000 to 2014

Greenville County Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse The Phoenix Center. Public Report. Fiscal Year 2013

Plumas County Area California Highway Patrol Alcohol and Other Drugs Statistics

MEDICATION ASSISTED TREATMENT PRESCRIPTION DRUG AND OPIOID ADDICTION THE IOWA CONSORTIUM FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION

National Drug Early Warning System (NDEWS) Los Angeles County Sentinel Community Site Appendix Data Tables, 2015

Crossroads for Women Application

Department of Human Services/Oregon Health Authority Addictions and Mental Health Division (AMH) November 25, 2009

Drug Abuse Trends Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota

Epidemiology of Addiction

Opioid Task Force Kick-Off Meeting. February 29, 2016

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2016 Statewide

alcohol and drug Treatment Services Report Hawai i,

Final Evaluation Report

MEDICATION ASSISTED TREATMENT PRESCRIPTION DRUG AND OPIOID ADDICTION THE IOWA CONSORTIUM FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION

MEDICATION ASSISTED TREATMENT PRESCRIPTION DRUG AND OPIOID ADDICTION THE IOWA CONSORTIUM FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2016 Essex County

THE IOWA CONSORTIUM FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION. Special Report: Opioid Admissions in Iowa August 2016

3726 E. Hampton St., Tucson, AZ Phone (520) Fax (520)

Outcomes Monitoring System Iowa Project

Albany County Coordinated Entry Assessment version 12, 11/29/16

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2016 Hudson County

BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL SCREENING ADULT

MINOR CLIENT HISTORY

DEPARTMENTS OF MENTAL HEALTH SOCIAL SERVICES AND YOUTH BUREAU

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2016 Passaic County

California's incarceration rate increased 52 percent in the last 20 years.

EVALUATION OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT YEAR 3

Division of Behavioral Health Services

Evaluation of Proposition 36: The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of Report

Outcomes Monitoring System Iowa Project

Evaluation of the First Judicial District Court Adult Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information

Physical Issues: Emotional Issues: Legal Issues:

RECOVERY APPLICATION The Foundry Ministries

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2016 Warren County

Community Needs Assessment. June 26, 2013

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2008 Warren County

Treatment Works, Kentucky: An Overview of Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes from KTOS

New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System (NJ-SAMS) Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions 1/1/ /31/2013 Resident of Union County

Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services Databook, FY08-09

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2016 Middlesex County

Persons Living with HIV/AIDS, San Mateo County Comparison

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2016 Hunterdon County

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2017 Morris County

Substance Abuse Overview 2015 Passaic County

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Colorado Division of Criminal Justice Evaluation of the Colorado Short Term Intensive Residential Remediation Treatment (STIRRT) Programs

EXODUS HOMES RESIDENT APPLICATION

MINNESOTA DWI COURTS: A SUMMARY OF EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE DWI COURT PROGRAMS

INITIAL ASSESSMENT (TCU CORRECTIONAL RESIDENTIAL FORMS)

Lancaster County Drug and Alcohol Commission Treatment Needs Assessment Summary

Sources of Consequence Data Related to Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs (National and Local)

New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System (NJ-SAMS) Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions 1/1/ /31/2013 Resident of Middlesex County

King County (Seattle Area) Sentinel Community Site (SCS) Drug Use Patterns and Trends, 2018

APPLICATION FORM NAME:

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Essex County

Office of National Drug Control Policy

Today s Presentation

Statistics from the Northern Ireland Drug Misuse Database: 1 April March 2012

Culturally Competent Substance Abuse Treatment Project

CLIENT HISTORY CLIENT LEGAL NAME: CLIENT PREFERRED NAME:

- PERSON BEING REFERRED - Age: DOB: SSN: Race: Address: City/State/ZIP: County: Telephone:

Transcription:

and Drug Abuse Services Client Demographics and Treatment Outcomes Based on California Outcomes Measurement System - Treatment (26 28) Prepared by: Curtis J. Condon, PhD Alaka Nafday, MS, MSc Samantha Tinsay, BS Orange County Health Care Agency Quality Management Planning & Research April 29 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 1

Orange County Residents in Treatment: 26 28 and Drug Abuse Services (ADAS) administers alcohol and other drug (AOD) prevention, treatment, and recovery services in Orange County. ADAS works in partnership with California Department of and Drug Programs (ADP) to reduce alcoholism, drug addiction and problem gambling in OC. This report is modeled on a report produced previously by ADP for the entire state of California. The following data come from California Outcomes Measurement System Treatment (CalOMS-Tx) for Orange County which collects client demographics and outcome data. This outcome data is collected from clients by treatment providers and covers the following areas: alcohol/drug use, criminal involvement, employment/education, family/social, mental health, and physical health. Clients are asked the same questions at admission, on the one-year anniversary date, and upon discharge from the treatment program. Admission Data From January 26 through December 28, there were 36,692 admissions to ADAS treatment system of care. The number of unduplicated clients admitted to treatment was 23,378. These figures include admissions to outpatient treatment, narcotic replacement therapy, day care rehabilitation, detoxification, and residential treatment services. The following graphs provide information obtained from client admission records with the exclusion of detoxification services. Thus, the total used for the admissions graphs is 28,164 or an average (avg) of 9,388 admissions per year (some clients may have more than one admission). Gender 7 6 5 26 27 28 Male Female On average, 67% of ADAS clients were male (avg=6,321/yr) and 33% female (avg=3,61/yr) over the 3-year period. genders (e.g., transgender) accounted less than 1% (.1%, avg=5/yr). 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 2

The figure below presents the same gender distribution in a pie chart. Gender Distribution of ADAS Clients in CalOMS (26-28) Female 33% Male 67% Race/Ethnicity 6 5 26 27 28 White Hispanic Asian/PI Black MultiRace/ Unknown Amer Indian/Alaskan Over half of all admissions (53%, avg=4,922/yr) were to non-hispanic Whites, followed by 37% Hispanic (avg=3,453/yr). Asian/Pacific Islanders accounted for about 4% (avg=358/yr) and African American/Black 3% (avg=317/yr). Multi-race/other combined for 2% (avg=2/yr), and American Indian/Alaskan Native less than 1% of all admissions (avg=67/yr). The figure below presents the same information in a pie graph. 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 3

Race/Ethnic Distribution of ADAS Clients in CalOMS (26-28) 4% 3% 1% 2% Non-Hispanic White Hispanic API Black Native Am/Alaskan Native 37% 53% Age 25 15 5 26 27 28 Teens (<18 years) 18-25 years 26-35 years 36-45 years 46-55 years 56+ years The majority (81%, avg=7,613/yr) of clients were adults (18 to 45 years). Teens accounted for 5% (avg=51/yr) and adults 46 and older about 14% (avg=1,265/yr). 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 4

Employment Status 35 25 15 5 26 27 28 Unemployed, looking for work Employed Full Time (35 hrs or more) Unemployed, not seeking work Employed Part Time (< 35 hrs) Not in the labor force (not seeking) The single largest group of clients was unemployed but looking for work (38%, avg=3,548/yr). A third (34%) was either employed full or part-time (avg=3,24/yr). The balance (28%; avg=2,56/yr) was not employed and not seeking work. Referral Source 5 45 35 25 15 5 SACPA Court/Probation Individual/Self-Referral Non-SACPA Court / Crim Just SACPA Parole / Drug Community Dependency Court/SSA health care provider Comprehensive Drug Court Drug Court Partnership DUI/DWI School/Educational/EAP/12-Step The majority of referrals, almost half, came from Substance Abuse Crime Prevention Act (SACPA or Prop 36) Court/Probation (47%, avg=4,379/yr), followed by Non-SACPA Court (18%, avg=1,686/yr). Self-referrals accounted for about 14% of admissions 26 27 28 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 5

(avg=1,318/yr). The balance of referrals resulted from other County Agencies and organizations (21%, avg=2,4/yr). Type of Service 8 7 6 5 26 27 28 Non-Residential/ OP/Recovery Residential Treatment (>3 days) Non-Residential out-patient/recovery services was the most common type of service provided (78%, avg=7,355). Residential treatment lasting more than 3 days accounted for 22% (avg=2,33/yr). Criminal Justice Involvement 7 6 5 26 27 28 On probation On Parole (CDCR) No criminal just involvement On parole (other jurisdiction) Incarcerated Diversion (Sec. ) Awaiting trial/charges/sentencing The vast majority of all clients (86%; avg=7,991/yr) had some criminal justice involvement (e.g., Probation or Parole) in the past 3 days. Fourteen percent (avg=1,314/yr) had no criminal justice involvement. 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 6

Client Characteristics 16 14 12 8 6 4 2 26 27 28 CalWorks Disabled Homeless Medi-Cal Mental Illness Veteran About 2% of clients were supported by CalWorks (avg=22/yr); 9% had at least one disability (avg=836/yr); 1% were homeless (avg=954/yr); 11% were Medi-Cal beneficiaries (avg=1,7/yr); 15% had been diagnosed with a mental illness (avg=1,365/yr); 3% were Veterans (avg=249/yr). Health Status 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 TB Hepatitis C STD Pregnant Mental Health Rx About 3% of clients had been diagnosed with TB (avg=27/yr); 6% had Hepatitis C (avg=547/yr); 5% had an STD (avg=425/yr); 5% of females were pregnant (avg=161/yr); and 9% had been prescribed medication in previous month for a mental health need (avg=825/yr). 26 27 28 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 7

HIV Testing Status 7 6 5 26 27 28 HIV Tested Client has results of HIV/AIDs test About 67% of clients (avg=6,2/yr) were HIV tested and 64% had their HIV/AIDS test results (avg=5,88/yr). Custody of Minor Children 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 1 2 3 4 5 or more How Many Children Out of Home Placement (Court Ordered) 26 27 28 Prior to treatment admission, about 89 parents on average have their children removed from their home each year because of parental substance abuse. This corresponds to an average of 1,833 children per year in protective custody. 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 8

Parental Rights Terminated 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 or more # children living w/ someone else & parental rights terminated On average, 36 parents per year have their parental rights terminated prior to treatment because of their substance abuse. This equates to an average of 67 children per year being permanently separated from their parents. 26 27 28 Housing Status 5 45 35 25 15 5 26 27 28 Independent Living Dependent Living Homeless About 1% of admissions are for homeless clients (avg=954/yr). Forty-two percent were in dependent living (avg=3,919/yr) and 48% were living independently (avg=4,438/yr). 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 9

Primary Drug of Abuse 6 5 26 27 28 The primary drug of choice for over half of all clients was amphetamine (54%; avg=5,14/yr). The second/third most common drugs of choice were (13%; avg=1,247/yr) and (13%; avg=1,219/yr). and were the 3 rd and 4 th most popular (respectively, 11%, avg=1,23/yr & 6%, avg=558/yr). Primary Drug of Abuse - Route of Administration 7 6 5 26 27 28 Oral Smoking Inhalation Injection (IV or IM) Smoking their drug of choice was the most common route of admission for the majority (64%) of admissions. This was especially true for 82% of methamphetamine users, 98% of marijuana users, 61% of cocaine/crack users, and 18% of heroin users. was most often injected (77%), while cocaine/crack was also inhaled 34% of the time. and drugs in pill form were taken orally most often. 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 1

Secondary Drug of Abuse 25 15 5 26 27 28 Opiates or Synthetics Ecstacy OxyCodone/OxyContin Tranquilizers (Benzodiazepines) was the secondary drug of choice for 35% of clients admitted, followed by alcohol (28%), and methamphetamine (17%). Primary Drug of Abuse by Non-Hispanic Whites 25 15 5 26 27 28 amphetamine was the predominant drug of choice for non-hispanic whites in treatment (55%; avg=2,74/yr), followed by marijuana and alcohol at 13%, each (avg=652/yr). About 11% of admissions were for heroin (avg=54/yr), 5% for cocaine/crack (avg=248/yr) for whites. 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 11

Primary Drug of Abuse by Hispanics 25 15 5 26 27 28 Similarly, methamphetamines was the predominant drug of choice for Hispanics in treatment (56%; avg=1,95/yr) followed by marijuana (14%; avg=47/yr) and alcohol at 12% (avg=42/yr). About 12% of admissions were for heroin (avg=47/yr), 5% for cocaine/crack (avg=165/yr) for Hispanics. Primary Drug of Abuse by Asian/Pacific Islanders 25 2 15 1 5 26 27 28 amphetamine was the predominant drug of choice for Asian/Pacific Islanders in treatment (58%; avg=29/yr) followed by marijuana (13%; avg=47/yr) and alcohol at 12% (avg=44/yr). Fully 1% of admissions were for cocaine/crack (avg=35/yr) and 4% of admissions were for heroin (avg=13/yr). 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 12

Primary Drug of Abuse by African-Americans 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 26 27 28 amphetamine and cocaine/crack were tied for the drug of choice for African Americans/blacks in treatment (31%; avg=99/yr, each) followed by marijuana (16%; avg=52/yr) and alcohol at 16% (avg=51/yr). About 5% of admissions were for heroin (avg=14/yr). Primary Drug of Abuse by Multi-Race/ 12 1 8 6 4 2 26 27 28 amphetamine was the predominant drug of choice for multi-race/others in treatment (55%; avg=19/yr) followed by cocaine/crack (15%; avg=3/yr) and marijuana (14%; avg=29/yr). was 4 th at 8% (avg=15/yr) and 3% of admissions were for heroin (avg=6/yr). 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 13

Drug of Choice by Age Group Teens (<18 yrs) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 26 27 28 All s The majority (59%) of teenagers in treatment used marijuana as their principal drug of choice. About a quarter use methamphetamine (24%) and 1% alcohol. Young Adults (18 to 25 years) 16 14 12 8 6 4 2 26 27 28 All s The drug of choice for most young adults (18 to 25 years) was methamphetamine (56%). was the preferred drug for 19% and heroin third at 12%. 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 14

Adults (26 to 35 years) 18 16 14 12 8 6 4 2 All s The drug of choice for most adults (26 to 35 years) was methamphetamine (6%). was the second most common drug at 12% and marijuana third at 11%. Ten percent used alcohol. 26 27 28 Adults (36 to 45) 16 14 12 8 6 4 2 26 27 28 All s amphetamine continued to be the drug of choice for 59% of adults 36 to 45 years. was preferred by 16% followed by heroin (1%), cocaine/crack (8%), and marijuana (6%). 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 15

Adults (46 to 55 years) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 26 27 28 All s Middle-aged adults drug of choice was methamphetamine (48%) followed by alcohol (21%), heroin (13%), and cocaine/crack (11%). Adults (56+ years) 6 5 4 3 2 1 26 27 28 All s While on average methamphetamine was the most popular drug of choice for 29% of older adults (56 years and older), it was followed closely by alcohol (28%) and heroin (22%). Fifteen percent of this age group also used cocaine/crack as their drug of choice. 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 16

Geographic Distribution of ADAS clients A geographic analysis of the ZIP code of residence of all ADAS clients showed that admissions were concentrated in certain parts of Orange County. With the exception of three ZIP codes in south Orange County, 54% of all ADAS clients resided in ZIP codes in the central, western, and northern regions of the county. ZIP codes in parts of Santa Ana, Anaheim, Garden Grove, Westminster, and Costa Mesa, in particular, had large numbers of clients. Notably, 19% of ADAS clients were homeless at admission while about half as many (1%) remained homeless at discharge. 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 17

Treatment Outcomes The following section presents data on how treatment impacted clients in terms several life domains (e.g., drug use, criminal justice involvement, employment) at admission compared to the client s status at discharge. Individual, matched records for clients at admission were compared to their status at discharge for a given episode of treatment (an episode of treatment for individual clients were identified and matched using unique MRN and FIN). In the tables below, the outcome measures are presented for the number of teenagers and adults reporting an event at admission versus at discharge for an episode of treatment. The percent change was calculated: [(D-A)/A] x 1%. Teenagers For teenagers (<18 years), 1,22 matched Admission/Discharge pairs were extracted from the 26-28 CalOMS data. As shown in the table below, teens in ADAS treatment showed improvement in almost all life domains. For example, the number of teens not using drugs at all at discharge increased 73% compared to when they started treatment. Fewer teens were arrested or had been in jail at discharge, 14% and 31% fewer respectively. Teens also reported less medical problems or related ER/hospital visits upon completing an episode of treatment. Notably, 135% more teens participated in social support recovery activities at discharge compared to admission. There was also a 2% reduction in the number of teens reporting serious family conflict and a 68% reduction in health problems. The only domains that did not improve were the percentage of teens living with an AOD user (up 5.6%) and the number in school. A 38% increase was also noted in number of teens requiring a psychiatric hospitalization, albeit the number of cases is small. Change in Client Functioning: Teenagers (<18 years) Life Domain Outcome Measures Admission Discharge Difference (D-A) Percent Change No Use 431 747 316 73.3% Primary Drug Used 1-2 days 518 259-259 -5.% Use Used 21 days or more 95 38-57 -6.% Criminal Arrested 117 11-16 -13.7% Involvement In Jail 188 13-58 -3.9% Employment & Employed 13 133 3 29.1% Education In school 1,27 993-34 -3.3% Had serious family 196 156-4 -2.4% conflict Family & Lives with AOD user 125 132 7 5.6% Social Used social support 198 465 267 134.8% services Emergency room visit 25 17-8 -32.% Medical & Overnight hospital 9 6-3 -33.3% Health stay Experienced health 59 19-4 -67.8% problems Mental Health Psychiatric ER visit 11 7-4 -36.4% 24-hour hospital stay 8 11 3 37.5% 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 18

Adults For adults (>18 years), 22,923 matched Admission/Discharge pairs were extracted from the 26-28 CalOMS data. As shown in the table below, adults in ADAS treatment showed improvement in all life domains. For example, the number of adults using drugs at discharge decreased compared to when they started treatment (e.g., 61% reduction in 21+ days of use in previous month). Importantly, 62% fewer adults were arrested and 69% fewer had been in jail upon completing an episode of treatment. Adults at discharge also reported 46% fewer medical problems and 4% fewer ER or hospital visits. There was also a 31% reduction in the number of adults reporting serious family conflict and 34% reduction in mental health problems requiring hospitalization. The number of adults enrolled in school remained essentially unchanged (n=953). Change in Client Functioning: Adults (>18 years) Life Domain Outcome Measures Admission Discharge Primary Drug Use Criminal Involvement Employment & Education Family & Social Medical & Health Mental Health Difference (D-A) Percent Change No Use 9,725 13,438 3713 38.2% Used 1-2 days 7,512 4,775-2737 -36.4% Used 21 days or more 1,589 613-976 -61.4% Arrested 5,32 2,4-328 -61.7% In Jail 7,66 2,213-4853 -68.7% In Prison 1,17 3-87 -72.9% Employed 9,699 11,465 1766 18.2% In School 954 953-1 -.1% Job Training n/a n/a n/a n/a Had serious family conflict 2,472 1,75-767 -31.% Lives with AOD user 3,111 2,87-124 -32.9% Used social support services 12,7 14,18 1318 1.4% Emergency room visit 1,55 891-614 -4.8% Overnight hospital stay 526 32-26 -39.2% Experienced health problems 3,63 1,651-1412 -46.1% Psychiatric ER visit 418 311-17 -25.6% 24-hour hospital stay 186 122-64 -34.4% Figures for homelessness and job training will be available at a later date. They were in advertently omitted from these analyses. 26-28 CalOMS Client Demographics & Treatment Outcomes 19