PRELIMINARY EXAM EVALUATION FACULTY SCORE SHEET

Similar documents
Core Competencies. Course Key. HPH 550: Theories of Health Behavior & Communication

Program Outcomes and Assessment September 2013

Rubrics for Research Category Submissions

Last Updated October 2016 Page 1

Reliability and Validity

Research Designs and Frameworks for Population Health Improvement. Setting a Research Agenda for Population Health

EMERALD: Improving diabetes outcomes for people with severe mental illness

Analysis A step in the research process that involves describing and then making inferences based on a set of data.

Table of Contents. EHS EXERCISE 1: Risk Assessment: A Case Study of an Investigation of a Tuberculosis (TB) Outbreak in a Health Care Setting

PEARL Assessment Rubric

Proposal Writing. Lynda Burton, ScD Johns Hopkins University

A CROSS-CULTURAL COUNSELLING PROGRAMME FOR ADOLESCENTS TRAUMATISED BY FAMILY VIOLENCE

This exam consists of three parts. Provide answers to ALL THREE sections.

Review of PIE Figure 1.2

SEMINAR ON SERVICE MARKETING

OU College of Public Health MPH in Health Promotion Sciences EVALUATION OF COMPETENCIES DURING COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION

Public Health Masters (MPH) Competencies and Coursework by Major

SOCI SOCIOLOGY. SOCI Sociology 1. SOCI 237 Media and Society

Conclusion. The international conflicts related to identity issues are a contemporary concern of societies

Integrative Thinking Rubric

Appendix D: Statistical Modeling

Assessing Cultural Competency from the Patient s Perspective: The CAHPS Cultural Competency (CC) Item Set

Social Work BA. Study Abroad Course List /2018 Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Social Work Department of Community and Social Studies

SOCIOLOGY SPECIFICATION GCE AS/A LEVEL. WJEC GCE AS/A LEVEL in. Teaching from For award from 2016 (AS) For award from 2017 (A level)

Checklist for assessing the gender responsiveness of sexual and reproductive health policies. Pilot document for adaptation to national contexts

Most candidates were able to gain marks on this question, though there were relatively few who were able to explain interpretive sociology.

Chapter 5: Producing Data

Reporting on ethics in HTA: Methods, results and interpretation

Chapter 3. Research Methodology. This chapter mentions the outline of research methodology and gives

Proposal. Equity-based childhood immunization policy-making in urban centres across Canada: A comparative analysis

Repositioning Validity

Science and Engineering Practice (SEP) Rubric

Psychotherapists and Counsellors Professional Liaison Group (PLG) 15 December 2010

MEAM Approach network communications guide

Epidemiologic Methods I & II Epidem 201AB Winter & Spring 2002

TRANSLATING RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE

Applied Social Psychology Msc.

Cannabis Health Impact Assessment. San Francisco Department of Public Health Office of Policy and Planning

Clinical Research Scientific Writing. K. A. Koram NMIMR

Global Learning at Hope College Background, definitions, criteria

M2. Positivist Methods

THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Funnelling Used to describe a process of narrowing down of focus within a literature review. So, the writer begins with a broad discussion providing b

Chapter.3 METHODOLOGY. The aim of this study is to analyse the types of politeness strategies found in economic

SMALL n IMPACT EVALUATION. Howard White and Daniel Phillips 3ie

Coherency Among Substance Abuse Models

Health Disparities Research. Kyu Rhee, MD, MPP, FAAP, FACP Chief Public Health Officer Health Resources and Services Administration

Guide to Rating Critical & Integrative Thinking for eportfolios Washington State University, Fall 2006

Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY-NET/JRF EXAMINATION DECEMBER 2013 prepared by Lakshmanan.MP, Asst Professor, Govt College Chittur

Sample size and sampling for quantitative research A. Bowling; Research Methods in Health(2002): pp

A proposal for collaboration between the Psychometrics Committee and the Association of Test Publishers of South Africa

Knowledge Building Part I Common Language LIVING GLOSSARY

Criteria for the evaluation of crime prevention practices

University of Kentucky College of Social Work Field Placement Student Self- Evaluation Form Community and Social Development (CSD) Concentration

BACHELOR S DEGREE IN SOCIAL WORK. YEAR 1 (60 ETCS) Fundamentals of Public and Private Law Sociology. Practicum I Introduction to Statistics

Overcoming the Achievement Gap Trap: Liberating Mindsets to Effect Change

Some Thoughts about Research Methodology and Design

College of Medicine. Behavioral Science

Group 3: Individuals and Society. Options: HL History and HL Psychology

Constructing Strong Logic Models to Guide Reforms in Teacher Preparation

Guiding Questions

Table 2. Mapping graduate curriculum to Graduate Level Expectations (GDLEs) - MSc (RHBS) program

Theoretical Perspectives in the PhD thesis: How many? Dr. Terence Love We-B Centre School of Management Information Systems Edith Cowan University

Karin Hannes Methodology of Educational Sciences Research Centre KU Leuven

Title: Determinants of intention to get tested for STI/HIV among the Surinamese and Antilleans in the Netherlands: results of an online survey

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. less patterned and called as interpretative methodology because the research result

SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH STANDARDS OF KNOWLEDGE FOR THE SCIENCE OF PREVENTION. June 1, 2011

Competency Rubric Bank for the Sciences (CRBS)

Not skilled at all Beginning skill Moderate skill Advanced skill Expert skill

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. It is qualitative because it is more

101 INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY.

Copyright 2014 The Guilford Press

From the editor: Reflections on research and publishing Journal of Marketing; New York; Oct 1996; Varadarajan, P Rajan;

400 Hour Evaluation of Student Learning Form Concordia University Social Work Practicum Program

CHECKLIST FOR EVALUATING A RESEARCH REPORT Provided by Dr. Blevins

Assessment Plan for Psychology Programs (B.A. & B.S.)

Course Descriptions for Courses in the Entry-Level Doctorate in Occupational Therapy Curriculum

GATE CAT Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

Culminating Assessments. Option A Individual Essay. Option B Group Research Proposal Presentation

COWLEY COLLEGE & Area Vocational Technical School

Social Work Assessment Report. Program Social Work. Assessed by: Jane Hoyt-Oliver. Date (June2014-June 2015):

Training Goals and Assessment Procedures Ph.D. in Counseling Psychology Ball State University

Purpose of Workshop. Faculty. Culturally Sensitive Research. ISOQOL Workshop 19 Oct 2005

Qualitative Methods in Operations Research. James Pfeiffer PhD, MPH Operations Research Mini-Course July 28, 2006

Writing implementation research grant proposals: 10 key ingredients

Coalitions Linking Action & Science for Prevention (CLASP)

How was your experience working in a group on the Literature Review?

Author's response to reviews

TOWARDS A TAXONOMY TO MEASURE THE PROGRESS OF SOCIETIES: A PROPOSAL BASED ON REFLECTIONS FROM MEXICO

Perceived usefulness. Intention Use E-filing. Attitude. Ease of use Perceived behavioral control. Subjective norm

Figure 1. Basic Introduction-Body-Conclusion Argument-Text Structure. Introduction. Body 1. Body 2. Body 3. Conclusion

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 156 ( 2014 ) 83 87

Methodological Issues in Quantitative Research on Race and Ethnicity

Principles of Sociology

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM

Catalog Addendum

Differences that occur by gender, race or ethnicity, education or income, disability, geographic location, or sexual orientation. Healthy People 2010

Transcription:

PRELIMINARY EXAM EVALUATION FACULTY SCORE SHEET BACKGROUND 1)Description of the PH topic 2) Social ecological aspects of the PH issue 1-4 (4 = competent refer to the rubric) 3) Social and cultural aspects of the PH topic STUDY DESIGN 4) Apply an appropriate theoretical framework to guide the proposed research 5) Identify an appropriate study population IDENTIFY AN APPROPRIATE DESIGN 6) Quantitative approach 7) Qualitative approach METHODOLOGY 8) Quantitative approach 9) Qualitative approach SAMPLING STRATEGY 10) Quantitative approach 11) Qualitative approach DATA ANALYSIS 12) Quantitative 13) Qualitative 14) Study limitations 15) Study implications 16) Ethical issues 17) Dissemination and utilization TOTAL (# of 3s and 4s) Outcomes: Pass: One must achieve 3 or 4 in at least 80% (14/17) of the items is a pass Revise & Resubmit: Those who have 3 or 4 in 70% < 80% (12-13/17) can revise and resubmit. Fail: Those who receive a 3 or 4 in less than 70% of the items (11 or less)* *The committee will require remediation for any item that receives a 2 or less.

PRELIMINARY EXAM EVALUATION FACULTY GUIDE BACKGROUND 1) Description of the PH topic. Does not describe the significance of the Identifies and describes the PH issue and its significance. Limited justifications on why the issue can be appropriately addressed by public health professionals. Identifies and describes the PH issue and its significance. Refers to epidemiological concepts and data. Identifies and describes the PH issue and its significance. Justifies why the issue can be appropriately addressed by public health professionals. Refers to epidemiological concepts and data. 2) Social ecological aspects of the Mentions social ecological model without detail and without connecting it to the issue. Explains social ecological model. Limited discussion of the Explains social ecological model. Discusses at least three Explains social ecological model. Discusses at least three Presents an argument for the relevance of considering these 3) Social and cultural aspects of the PH topic. Limited description of the social and cultural context. Does not offer relevant examples of how the context affects/modifies the issue. Describes social and cultural context. Gives relevant examples of how the context affects/modifies the issue. (Student addresses < 3 of the following: SES, ethnicity, political ideology, culture, social values) Describes social and cultural context. Gives relevant examples of how the context affects/modifies the issue. (Student addresses at least 3 of the following: SES, ethnicity, political ideology, culture, social values) Describes social and cultural context. Gives relevant examples of how the context affects/modifies the issue. (Student addresses at least 3 of the following: SES, ethnicity, political ideology, culture, social values) Discusses the issue as it relates to the social inequalities and/or health disparities.

STUDY DESIGN 4) Apply an appropriate theoretical framework to guide the proposed research. Limited application of theory. Identifies relevant theories but perhaps not at the appropriate ecological level. Limited relation between theoretical constructs and study concepts. Identifies relevant theories at the appropriate ecological level. Translates theoretical constructs into study concepts. Identifies relevant theories at the appropriate ecological level. Translates theoretical constructs into study concepts. Justifies use of chosen theory. 5) Identify an appropriate study population. Describess the population but uses no data. Describes the population using limited data. Describes the population using data (age, income, race/ethnicity, location, etc.) Describes the population using data (age, income, race/ethnicity, location, etc.) Demonstrates the appropriateness of selecting this population to study this issue. 6) Identify an appropriate design. A. Quantitative approach States either research question(s) or hypotheses but unclearly. States research question(s) and hypotheses but somewhat unclearly. States clear hypotheses. answer research question(s) States clear hypotheses. answer research Proposes alternative designs and/or justifies choice of current design.

B. Qualitative approach Does not state clear research Suggests but does not argue how this design will answer research answer research question(s) answer research Proposes alternative designs and/or justifies choice of current design. 7) Methodology A. Quantitative approach Methods inappropriate to answer research Does not describe how to measure variables. Describes how to measure chosen variables. Does not operationalize theoretical constructs into study variables. Operationalizes theoretical constructs into study variables. Describes how to measure chosen variables. States data collection procedures. Operationalizes study concepts into study variables. Describes how to measure chosen variables. Clearly states data collection procedures. Evaluates advantages and disadvantages to methods. B. Qualitative approach Methods inappropriate to answer research States procedures. Does either of the following: Discusses how to explore the constructs defined for study. OR Describes how to gain access to setting and maintain field relations. States data collection procedures. Discusses how to explore the constructs defined for study. Describes how to gain access to setting and maintain field relations. Clearly states data collection procedures. Clearly discusses how to explore the constructs defined for study. Clearly describes how to gain access to setting and maintain field relations. Evaluates advantages and disadvantages to methods.

8) Sampling strategy. A. Quantitative approach Mentions sampling frame with no description. Mentions the sampling strategy but does not explain it in detail. Describes the sampling frame to a limited extent. Discusses inclusion/exclusion criteria or unit of analysis but is unclear. Proposes a sampling strategy (SRS, stratified, etc.) and explains it without sufficient detail. Clearly describes the sampling frame. Proposes a sampling strategy (SRS, stratified, etc.) and explains it with detail. Explains the factors that will affect the sample size. Clearly describes the sampling frame. Proposes a sampling strategy (SRS, stratified, etc.) and explains it with detail. Explains the factors that will affect the sample size. Justifies the sampling strategy. B. Qualitative approach Mentions inclusion/exclusion criteria but with little discussion. Mentions the sampling strategy but does not explain in detail why the strategy was chosen. Proposes a selection strategy and explains it with sufficient detail. Proposes a selection strategy and explains it with sufficient detail. Explains the factors that limit sample size. Proposes a selection strategy and explains it with sufficient detail. Explains the factors that influence sample size. Justifies the selection strategy. 9) Data analysis A. Quantitative Does not discuss a data analysis strategy. Limited discussion about goals, procedures and principles of data analysis. Describes data management plan. Statistical tests inappropriate. Explains goals, procedures and principles of data analysis. Describes data management plan. Identifies appropriate statistical tests. Clearly explains goals, procedures and principles of data analysis. Describes data management plan. Identifies appropriate statistical tests. Justifies choice of statistical tests. Discusses importance of statistical power. Discusses statistical and practical significance.

B. Qualitative Does not discuss a data analysis strategy. Limited discussion about goals, procedures and principles of data analysis. Generally unclear about interpretive strategy. Explains goals, procedures and principles of data analysis. Explains how to identify themes/new constructs, etc. Clearly explains goals, procedures and principles of data analysis. Clearly explains how to identify themes/new constructs, etc. Clearly discusses the role of triangulation in this study. 10) Study limitations. Little or no discussion on study limitations. Limited discussion on major limitations to study. Limited attention to issues of validity and reliability Identifies and explains major limitations to study. Adequately addresses issues of validity and reliability. Explains how to deal with study limitations. Identifies and explains major limitations to study. Clearly addresses issues of validity and reliability. Explains how to deal with study limitations. Proposes different study design/methods that would address stated limitations. 11) Study implications Does not identify study implications. Limited discussion on what the research intends to accomplish regarding social ecological, cultural, and social justice background of topic. Limited discussion on what ways research will impact public health topic. Discusses what the research intends to accomplish regarding social ecological, cultural, and social justice background of topic. Explains the ways in which research will impact public health topic. Discusses what the research intends to accomplish regarding social ecological, cultural, and social justice background of topic. Explains the ways in which research will impact public health topic. Discusses relative contribution of each methodological approach to topic.

12) Ethical issues Does not identify or discuss ethical issues associated with study. Identifies but does not discuss or address ethical issues associated with study. Identifies and discusses the ethical issues associated with study. Identifies and discusses the ethical issues associated with study. Addresses these issues in study design. 13) Dissemination and utilization Does not describe intended audience or dissemination strategy. Describes intended audience and/or stakeholders but justification for audience is limited. Identifies a strategy to disseminate results but discussion is limited. Describes and justifies intended audience and/or stakeholders. Identifies and discusses a strategy to disseminate results. Describes and justifies intended audience and/or stakeholders Identifies and discusses the approach to disseminate results. Discusses the ways that the research will be helpful to intended audience.