Statistical analysis plan

Similar documents
Supplementary material 1. Definitions of study endpoints (extracted from the Endpoint Validation Committee Charter) 1.

Relationship between body mass index, coronary disease extension and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Occurrence of Bleeding and Thrombosis during Antiplatelet therapy In Non-cardiac surgery. A prospective observational study.

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Supplementary Table 1. Details of the components of the primary composite endpoint

Supplementary webappendix

Transient Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Stroke after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Supplement Table 1. Definitions for Causes of Death

TCTAP Upendra Kaul MD,DM,FACC,FSCAI,FAMS,FCSI

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Statistical Analysis Plan

Unprotected Left Main Stenting: Patient Selection and Recent Experience. Alaide Chieffo. S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

What is the Optimal Triple Anti-platelet Therapy Duration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Drug-eluting Stents Implantation?

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

HEART AND SOUL STUDY OUTCOME EVENT - MORBIDITY REVIEW FORM

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Diabetes and Occult Coronary Artery Disease

REVISED MI DEFINITIONS IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL TRIALS. Maarten L Simoons Thoraxcenter - Erasmus MC Rotterdam - The Netherlands

and Treatment in Emergency Care) Trial: Intravenous Glucose, Insulin & Potassium (GIK) in Emergency Medical Services

Patient referral for elective coronary angiography: challenging the current strategy

Topic. Updates on Definition of Myocardial Infarction

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, On the behalf of SMART-DATE trial investigators ACC LBCT 2018

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

Essam Mahfouz, MD. Professor of Cardiology, Mansoura University

Subsequent management and therapies

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Cardiac evaluation for the noncardiac. Nathaen Weitzel MD University of Colorado Denver Dept of Anesthesiology

Management of High-Risk CAD : Surgeons Perspective

Supplementary Online Content

The Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction 3 rd revision, 2012

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE: STANDARD OF CARE

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Without On-site Cardiac Surgery

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

WHI Form Report of Cardiovascular Outcome Ver (For items 1-11, each question specifies mark one or mark all that apply.

The SYNTAX-LE MANS Study

Case Report Left Main Stenosis. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)?

Clinical Study Age Differences in Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Patients Treated with Drug Eluting Stents at a Tertiary Medical Center

TROPONIN POSITIVE 2/20/2015 WHAT DOES IT MEAN? When should a troponin level be obtained?

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Coronary Artery Stenosis. Insight from MAIN-COMPARE Study

Evaluating Clinical Risk and Guiding management with SPECT Imaging

Indications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014

Diagnostic, Technical and Medical

Zachary I. Hodes, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.C.

Surveillance report 2016 Hyperglycaemia in acute coronary syndromes National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Surveillance programme

Sustained Benefit 20 Years After Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Conventional CABG Or On Pump Beating Heart: A Difference In Myocardial Injury?

Cardiovascular Disorders Lecture 3 Coronar Artery Diseases

Bifurcation stenting with BVS

Influence of Planned Six-Month Follow-Up Angiography on Late Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Randomized Study

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Ischemia burden on stress SPECT MPI predicts long-term outcomes after revascularization in stable coronary artery disease

Early and One-year Outcomes of Aortic Root Surgery in Marfan Syndrome Patients

Assessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery. Murali Sivarajan, M.D. Professor University of Washington Seattle, Washington

A Normal Reference Coronary Flow Reserve is Associated With a Lower Mortality in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Rationale for Percutaneous Revascularization ESC 2011

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

FAME STUDY: 2-year Follow-Up & CLINICAL SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

DUKECATHR Dataset Dictionary

Balancing Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitors for ACS Patients

Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest. Franz R. Eberli MD, FESC, FAHA Cardiology Triemli Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

Impact of coronary atherosclerotic burden on clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease

Michael Mack, M.D. Baylor Healthcare System Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Dallas, TX

A Large Prospective Randomized Trial of DES vs BMS in Patients with STEMI

LM stenting - Cypher

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

Ischemic Stroke in Critically Ill Patients with Malignancy

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

patients with ACS who have hyperglycemia, aiming at strict blood glucose normalization.

Concurrent Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report

Left Main PCI vs. CABG: Real World

The MAIN-COMPARE Registry

UPDATES FROM THE 2018 ANTIPLATELET GUIDELINES

Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in ACS/PCI Which one to choose? V. Voudris MD FESC FACC 2 nd Cardiology Division Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center

Surgical vs. Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome

PCI vs. CABG From BARI to Syntax, Is The Game Over?

Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival, measured as the time in weeks from randomization to date of death due to any cause.

Michael Mack, M.D. Baylor Healthcare System Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Dallas, TX

Continuing Medical Education Post-Test

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Alex versus Xience Registry Preliminary report

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Ray Matthews MD Professor of Clinical Medicine Chief of Cardiology University of Southern California

SKG Congress, 2015 EVOLVE II. Stephan Windecker

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Myocardial injury, necrosis and infarction

New insights in stent thrombosis: Platelet function monitoring. Franz-Josef Neumann Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

Transcription:

Statistical analysis plan Prepared and approved for the BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial by Prof. Dr. Eric Boersma Dr. Victor Umans Dr. Jan Hein Cornel Maarten de Mulder Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 1 of 10

Introduction This Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) is developed to guide the main analysis of the BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial data, i.e. the analysis of the relation between randomly allocated treatment (intensive glucose regulation or conventional glucose management) and infarct size as measured by cardiac Troponin T at 72 hours after admission. This document is based on the original study protocol and published trial design, and it was disclosed before trial data were released (Netherlands Trial Register, trial ID: NTR 1205). The SAP describes the patient characteristics and outcomes that will be analyzed, as well as the statistical methods that will be applied. Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 2 of 10

Role of the funding source The BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial was sponsored by the Foreest Instituut, Alkmaar, The Netherlands and the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands (ICIN), Utrecht, The Netherlands. The study was initiated by the study investigators (Boersma, Cornel, Umans), and was designed and conducted independently of the sponsors. This SAP was also prepared by the study investigators, entirely independent of the sponsors. Representatives of the funding sources did not have any influence on the planned analyses, nor will they have influence on the interpretation and reporting of the trial results. Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 3 of 10

Background of the study Elevated admission plasma glucose (APG) is associated with increased mortality in patients who are admitted with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This is probably mediated by increased inflammation, apoptosis and coagulation and a disturbed endothelial function that can be found in hyperglycemic patients. Insulin has several characteristics that can (potentially) counteract these mechanisms. Design The BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial is a single centre prospective randomized open-label clinical trial. The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intensive glucose regulation with intravenous insulin compared to conventional (expectative) glucose management in patients presenting with an ACS and an APG between 7.8 and 16 mmol/l. A total of 300 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intensive or conventional glucose management. All patients will receive standard medical care. The primary endpoint is myocardial infarct size, as expressed by the cardiac Troponin T level 72 hours after admission. We postulate that intensive glucose regulation may help to limit infarct size. To study the metabolic effects of insulin administration, we will investigate biomarker wash out patterns of various metabolic mechanisms. These will address inflammation, oxidative stress, hypercoagulability, endothelial activation and vasodilatation. The trial design was published earlier: De Mulder et al. Diabet Med. 2011 Oct; 28(10):1168-75. Follow up The clinical follow up data that will be presented together with the results of the primary endpoint analysis will consist of data collected until the first outpatient visit, which is scheduled 6 weeks after randomization. We intent to collect endpoints on a yearly base, which will be analyzed in the future. Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 4 of 10

Endpoint definitions (based on the ARC Dublin criteria) Death: All deaths are considered cardiac unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established. Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, and all procedure-related deaths, including those related to concomitant treatment. Vascular death: Death caused by non-coronary vascular causes, such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular diseases. Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions, such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma. Re Myocardial Infarction Troponin I or CKMB as routinely measured in clinic > Upper normal limit (UNL) (i.e. >0.45 ug/l or >16 U/l respectively) or ECG showing new persistent or non-persistent ST-segment elevation >1.0 mm in two or more contiguous leads. Given that previous values have stabilized (= Stable or decreasing values on 2 samples and 20% increase 3 to 6 hours after second sample). For peri procedural infarction: PCI > 3x UNL Troponin or CKMB, <48 hrs after PCI CABG > 5x UNL Troponin or CKMB, <7 days after CABG Stent thrombosis (definite) I.e. angiographic or pathologic confirmed stent thrombosis. + The presence of a thrombus that originates in the stent or in the segment 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent and (within 48 hours) typical anginal complaints, new suggestive ECG findings or positive MI biomarkers. Early stent thrombosis; 0-30 days Late stent thrombosis; >30 days Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the stent. Any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 5 of 10

Elective Revascularization (Non Target Lesion) Elective revascularization (PCI or CABG) for another lesion than index event related lesion. Stroke Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, Diagnosed by typical clinical presentation plus confirmed by CT scan of the brain and/or neurologist. Endpoint Adjudication Clinical events were recorded by the investigators and prior to data analysis all clinical events were adjudicated by an independent endpoint committee. Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 6 of 10

Statistical handling policy Significance All statistical tests will use a significance level of α=0.05, all tests will be two sided. Confidence intervals (CI) will be presented with 95% degree of confidence. All p values will be rounded to 3 decimal places; p values that round to 0.000 will be presented as <0.001. Data summarization Dichotome variables will be presented as numbers and percentages, continuous variables will be presented as medians with their 25 th and 75 th percentile, or means ± one standard deviation (SD), as appropriate. Data distribution Chi-square tests will be used to analyze differences in categorical data between independent groups. If expected cell frequencies are less than 5, Fisher s exact tests will be used instead. The distribution of continuous data will be tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. We assume a normal distribution in case of a non significant test (p >0.05). Student s t-tests will be used to analyze differences in continuous data with normal distribution between independent groups. Mann-Whitney tests will be used in case of non normal distributions. Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 7 of 10

Statistical analyses Intention to treat population All analyses will be performed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The ITT population consists of all subjects who were correctly assigned a randomization number. We will exclude patients from the ITT population who were evidently randomized erroneously, i.e. patients without ACS who were identified as such within 1 hour after randomization, and who had no further study procedures except randomization. The ITT population is considered the main analysis population of the BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial. Per protocol population We will also perform a per protocol (PP) analysis. The PP population is defined as a subset of the ITT population, and consists of patients who are actually treated as randomized. Primary efficacy analysis The primary efficacy endpoint of the BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial is the myocardial infarct size, defined as the cardiac Troponin T level at 72 hours after admission. Troponin T at 72 hours will be measured in a core laboratory (Erasmus MC) by using the Cobas 8000 analysis system. During admission, blood samples are collected at regular time points until 96 hours. The 72 hours sample is defined as the sample that is collected a) within 48 to 96 hours after admission, and b) that has smallest absolute time distance to the 72 hour time point. We will determine the mean (median) Troponin T value at 72 hours in both treatment arms. A Student s t test (or Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate) will be applied to evaluate the (statistical significance of the) difference between the mean (median) values. Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 8 of 10

Further analysis of cardiac Troponin - I The relation between allocated treatment and Troponin T at 72 hours will be further studied with help of linear regression, adjusting for the Troponin T value at admission (model A), and adjusting for age, gender and the Troponin T value at admission (model B). Further analysis of Troponin - II Patients will be classified as having had a small or large myocardial infarction, as follows. Patients with a Troponin T value at 72 hours < than the mean value of all patients (irrespective the allocated treatment) will be classified as having had a small, whereas those with a value the mean will be classified as having had a large infarction. If Troponin data are non normally distributed, the median (in stead of the mean) value will be used as threshold. The relation between allocated treatment and dichotomized infarct size will then be studied by logistic regression analysis. We will run a univariable model with allocated treatment as single determinant (model A), as well as a multivariable model with adjustment for Troponin T values at admission (model B), and a model with adjustment for age, gender and admission Troponin T (model C). Results will be reported as odds ratios and 95% CIs. Secondary endpoint analysis We will also estimate infarct size with two other techniques. First, the area under the CKMB curve will be calculated by the linear-trapezoidal method that is described by Vollmer et al Am.J.Clin.Pathol. 1993;100:293-8. CKMB values will be obtained at admission and 6, 12, 24, 36 and 72 h after the onset of symptoms. Missing baseline and 72 hour values will be substituted with the value 0. The log normal function will be used to estimate missing values at intermediate time points. Second, a rest gated myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) will be performed 6 (±1) weeks after the index event, using 99mTc-myoview single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Based on this technique, infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and summed rest score (SRS) will be determined. Missing data When using modeling techniques, missing data will be imputed when 1% of the input of a variable is missing. Data will be imputed using multiple imputation. Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 9 of 10

Subgroups Treatment effects will be studied in relation to the following characteristics: - Sex - Age; <75 vs. 75 yrs - Killip class; class 1 vs. class 2 or higher - Anterior vs. non anterior infarction - Non-insulin treated diabetes vs. previous unknown diabetes - ST segment elevation- vs. non-st-segment elevation ACS - Time from onset of symptoms to randomization - Admission plasma glucose level < 10 mmol/l vs. 10 mmol/l and <10; 10 12; 12 mmol/l - HbA1c level; < 5.7%; 5.7 6.4% and 6.5% Furthermore we will compare the treatment effect of intensive versus conventional glucose regulation in the following subgroups: 1) For ST segment elevation ACS patients, those with admission plasma glucose level < 10 mmol/l vs. 10 mmol/l. 2) For Killip class 2 or higher patients, those with admission plasma glucose level < 10 mmol/l vs. 10 mmol/l. 3) For ST segment elevation ACS patients, those admitted < 2 hours after onset of symptoms vs. 2 6 and 6 hours. Further analyses on patients who received intensive glucose regulation We will separately investigate patients who received intensive glucose regulation. In this subset, we will study: 1) The relation between the duration of IV insulin administration (<24 versus 24 hours) and Troponin T at 72 hours after admission. 2) The relation between the glucose level (<7.8 versus 7.8 mmol/l) at the time the insulin perfusor was actually started and Troponin T at 72 hours after admission. 3) As 2, but now using the value of 10 mmol/l as threshold. 4) The relation between the timing ( 2 versus >2 hours after admission) of the start of the insulin perfusor and Troponin T at 72 hours after admission. Statistical analysis plan - BIOMArCS 2 glucose trial - Final version Page 10 of 10