Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: March 5, 2018 Report Length: 5 Pages

Similar documents
Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: June 12, 2018 Report Length: 5 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: REFERENCE LIST Side Effect Free Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Cancer: Clinical Effectiveness

Clinical Review Report (Sample)

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: January 21, 2019 Report Length: 5 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: October 30, 2018 Report Length: 7 Pages

Inpatient and Outpatient Treatment Programs for Substance Use Disorder: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: July 09, 2018 Report Length: 7 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: October 25, 2017 Report Length: 60 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

CADTH Therapeutic Review

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: April 4, 2018 Report Length: 14 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: August 30, 2018 Report Length: 11 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: April 6, 2018 Report Length: 10 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

DATE: 17 July 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Increasing Frequency of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Strips During Pregnancy: A Review of the Clinical and Cost- Effectiveness and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: April 3, 2018 Report Length: 23 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: April 6, 2018 Report Length: 40 Pages

TITLE: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Adults with Mental Illness: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness

Point-Of-Care D-Dimer Testing: A Review of Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Utility, and Safety

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: January 15, 2018 Report Length: 36 Pages

TITLE: Discontinuation of Benzodiazepines and Other Sedative-Hypnotic Sleep Medication in Hospitalized Patients: Clinical Evidence and Guidelines

TITLE: Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Acute Injury Transfers: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: January 17, 2018 Report Length: 18 Pages

TITLE: Montelukast for Sleep Apnea: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Cost Effectiveness, and Guidelines

TITLE: Delivery of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Non-Hospital Settings: A Review of the Safety and Guidelines

CADTH HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT Screening for Hepatitis C Virus: A Systematic Review

DATE: 04 April 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: December 21, 2017 Report Length: 26 Pages

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

BRAF Targeted Therapy for Patients with Melanoma and Active Brain Metastases: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: February 15, 2017 Report Length: 15 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Benzydamine for Acute Sore Throat: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: May 31, 2018 Report Length: 57 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: October 18, 2017 Report Length: 20 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Management and Treatment of Cervicitis: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

TITLE: Use of Bupropion in Patients with Depression and the Associated Risk of Seizures: Safety

TITLE: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Economic Impact and Existing HTA Recommendations

Insulin Pens in Acute Care Settings: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost- Effectiveness, and Guidelines

TITLE: Probenecid Dosing When Given with Cefazolin: Guidelines and Clinical Effectiveness

Title: Re-using the Canister Portion of Metered Dose Inhalers in a Hospital Setting: Clinical Review of Safety, Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Pharmacoeconomic Review Report

TITLE: Critical Incident Stress Debriefing for First Responders: A Review of the Clinical Benefit and Harm

TITLE: Shilla and MAGEC Systems for Growing Children with Scoliosis: A Review of the Clinical Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

COMPUS OPTIMAL THERAPY REPORT. Supporting Informed Decisions. À l appui des décisions éclairées. Proton Pump Inhibitor Project Overview: Summaries

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: April 20, 2018 Report Length: 21 Pages

Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: January 5, 2017 Report Length: 23 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Nabilone for Chronic Pain Management: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

TITLE: Immediate Osseointegrated Implants for Cancer Patients: A Review of Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

Pharmacoeconomic Review Report

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: November 13, 2017 Report Length: 26 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

TITLE: Naltrexone for the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence in Individuals with Co- Dependencies: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness

TITLE: Dose of Electrical Current for Biphasic Defibrillators for Synchronous Cardioversion in Patients with Tachyarrhythmia: Guidelines

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Title: Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurism Repair versus Open Surgery: A Clinical and Cost Effectiveness Review

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: August 31, 2018 Report Length: 10 Pages

TITLE: Type of Thermometer for Inpatients: Clinical-Effectiveness and Guidelines

SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dialectical Behavioral Therapy for Adults with Mental Illness: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

Health Interventions in Ambulatory Cancer Care Centres DRAFT. Objectives. Methods

This report will provide a review on the comparative clinical effectiveness and safety between intranasal triamcinolone and beclomethasone.

TITLE: Vacuum Boards for Spinal Motion Restriction: Clinical Effectiveness

TITLE: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Autism: A Review of the Clinical and Cost- Effectiveness

Title: Shortened Dental Arch and Restorative Therapies: Evidence for Functional Dentition

Date: 23 June Context and policy issues:

Orthodontic Treatment for the Management of Pain or Impacted Teeth in Patients with Malocclusion: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

Common Drug Review Pharmacoeconomic Review Report

CADTH Optimal Use Report

Quality ID #113 (NQF 0034): Colorectal Cancer Screening National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

TITLE: Acetylsalicylic Acid for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A Review of Clinical Evidence, Benefits and Harms

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 2.0 Publication Date: November 29, 2018 Report Length: 20 Pages

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

DATE: 10 February 2016 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Title: Parenteral Iron Therapy for Anemia: A Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness Review

CADTH TECHNOLOGY REVIEW Current Practice Analysis: Interventions for Insomnia Disorder

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

TITLE: Closed Catheter Systems for Prevention of Urinary Tract Infections: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: July 19, 2017 Report Length: 66 Pages

DATE: 21 November 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

DATE: 09 December 2009 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES:

Laparoscopic vs Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery: Making it better!

Quality ID #113 (NQF 0034): Colorectal Cancer Screening National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

HTA September health technology assessment rapid review. Supporting Informed Decisions. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: July 04, 2018 Report Length: 47 Pages

Metastatic Melanoma Gap Analysis: Protocol

Title: Scoop Stretcher for Restriction of Spinal Motion: Clinical Effectiveness

TITLE: Long-term Use of Acamprosate Calcium for Alcoholism: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, and Guidelines

DENOMINATOR: All patients undergoing anterior or apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery

TITLE: Periodic Dental Examinations for Oral Health: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost Effectiveness, and Guidelines

TITLE: Optimal Oxygen Saturation Range for Adults Suffering from Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of Patient Benefit, Harms, and Guidelines

Health Interventions in Ambulatory Cancer Care Centres

Clinical Review Report

Transcription:

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: REFERENCE LIST Oral Neomycin in Preparation for Colorectal Procedures: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost- Effectiveness and Guidelines Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: March 5, 2018 Report Length: 5 Pages

Authors: Kelsey Seal, Lorna Adcock Cite As: Oral neomy cin in preparation f or colorectal procedures: clinical ef f ectiveness, cost effectiveness and guidelines. Ottawa: CADTH; 2018 Mar. (CADTH rapid response report: ref erence list). Acknowledgments: Disclaimer: The inf ormation in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care prof essionals, health sy stems leaders, and policy -makers make well-inf ormed decisions and thereby improv e the quality of health care serv ices. While patients and others may access this document, the document is made av ailable f or inf ormational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its f itness f or any particular purpose. The inf ormation in this document should not be used as a substitute f or prof essional medical adv ice or as a substitute f or the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other prof essional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency f or Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any inf ormation, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or serv ic es. While care has been taken to ensure that the inf ormation prepared by CADTH in this document is accurate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date the material was f irst published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that ef f ect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible f or the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing this document. The v iews and opinions of third parties published in this document do not necessarily state or ref lect those of CADTH. CADTH is not responsible f or any errors, omissions, injury, loss, or damage arising f rom or relating to the use (or misuse) of any inf ormation, statements, or conclusions contained in or implied by the contents of this document or any of the source materials. This document may contain links to third-party websites. CADTH does not hav e control ov er the content of such sites. Use of third-party sites is gov erned by the third-party website owners own terms and conditions set out f or such sites. CADTH does not make any guarantee with respect to any inf ormation contained on such third-party sites and CADTH is not responsible f or any injury, loss, or damage suf f ered as a result of using such third-party sites. CADTH has no responsibility f or the collection, use, and disclosure of personal inf ormation by third-party sites. Subject to the af orementioned limitations, the v iews expressed herein are those of CADTH and do not necessarily represent the v iews of Canada s f ederal, prov incial, or territorial gov ernments or any third party supplier of inf ormation. This document is prepared and intended f or use in the context of the Canadian health care sy stem. The use of this document outside of Canada is done so at the user s own risk. This disclaimer and any questions or matters of any nature arising f rom or relating to the content or use (or misuse) of this document will be gov erned by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Prov ince of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein, and all proceedings shall be subject to the exclusiv e jurisdiction of the courts of the Prov ince of Ontario, Canada. The copy right and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document f or non-commercial purposes only, prov ided it is not modif ied when reproduced and appropriate credit is giv en to CADTH and its licensors. About CADTH: CADTH is an independent, not-f or-prof it organization responsible f or prov iding Canada s health care decision-makers with objectiv e ev idence to help make inf ormed decisions about the optimal use of drugs, medical dev ices, diagnostics, and procedures in our health care sy stem. REFERENCE LIST Oral Neomy cin f or Colorectal Procedures 2

Research Questions 1. What is the clinical effectiveness of oral neomycin as part of preparation for colorectal procedures? 2. What is the cost-effectiveness of oral neomycin as part of preparation for colorectal procedures? 3. What are evidence-based guidelines informing the use of oral neomycin as part of preparation for colorectal procedures? Key Findings No literature was identified regarding oral neomycin as part of the preparation for colorectal procedures. Methods A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) databases and a focused Internet search. No methodological filters were applied to limit retrieval by publication type. The search was limited to English language documents published between January 1, 2013 and February 27, 2018. Internet links were provided, where available. Selection Criteria One reviewer screened citations and selected studies based on the inclusion criteria presented in Table 1. Table 1: Selection Criteria Population Intervention Comparator Patients preparing to undergo colorectal procedures (e.g., planned procedures such as colonoscopy, hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, anterior resection not emergency procedures where oral antibiotics and/or mechanical bowel preparation would not be possible) Oral neomycin (i.e., used as part of preparation for colorectal procedures) Q1-2: Oral antibiotics other than neomycin (used as part of preparation for colorectal procedures e.g., kanamycin, or any viable alternatives for neomycin used in a Canadian context) Q3: No comparator Outcomes Q1: Clinical effectiveness i.e., benefits (e.g., decreased postop infection) or harms (e.g. infection, anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal infections, ileus, repeat procedure, readmission) Q2: Cost-effectiveness Q3: Evidence-based guidelines Study Designs Health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized studies, economic evaluations, evidence-based guidelines REFERENCE LIST Oral Neomy cin f or Colorectal Procedures 3

Results Rapid Response reports are organized so that the higher quality evidence is presented first. Therefore, health technology assessment reports, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are presented first. These are followed by randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies, economic evaluations, and evidence-based guidelines. No health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies, economic evaluations, or evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding oral neomycin as part of the preparation for colorectal procedures. References of potential interest are provided in the appendix. Health Technology Assessments Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Randomized Controlled Trials Non-Randomized Studies Economic Evaluations Guidelines and Recommendations REFERENCE LIST Oral Neomy cin f or Colorectal Procedures 4

Appendix Further Information Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Neomycin Not Specified 1. Chen M, Song X, Chen LZ, Lin ZD, Zhang XL. Comparing mechanical bowel preparation with both oral and systemic antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation and systemic antibiotics alone for the prevention of surgical site infection after elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Jan;59(1):70-8. PubMed: PM26651115 Non-Randomized Studies Mixed Intervention 2. Vo E, Massarweh NN, Chai CY, Tran Cao HS, Zamani N, Abraham S, et al. Association of the addition of oral antibiotics to mechanical bowel preparation for left colon and rectal cancer resections with reduction of surgical site infections. JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):114-21. PubMed: PM29049477 Qualitative Study 3. Feng C, Sidhwa F, Anandalwar S, Pennington EC, Glass C, Cameron D, et al. Contemporary practice among pediatric surgeons in the use of bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association. J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Oct;50(10):1636-40. PubMed: PM26054862 Review Articles 4. Inaba CS, Pigazzi A. Current trends in the use of bowel preparation for colorectal surgery. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2017;13(3):227-33. 5. Koullouros M, Khan N, Aly EH. The role of oral antibiotics prophylaxis in prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jan;32(1):1-18. PubMed: PM27778060 REFERENCE LIST Oral Neomy cin f or Colorectal Procedures 5