ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

Similar documents
INCLUDES: OVERVIEW ON CLINICAL SITUATIONS FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTERED IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTS MECHANOTHERAPY USED TO RESOLVE THESE SITUATIONS

The Tip-Edge appliance and

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

The management of impacted

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CORRECTION OF BUCCAL CROSSBITE OF MAXILLARY SECOND MOLAR

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

eral Maxillary y Molar Distalization with Sliding Mechanics: Keles Slider

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

The Inman Aligner. The Inman Aligner,* a versatile removable

6. Timing for orthodontic force

RETENTION AND RELAPSE

An estimated 25-30% of all orthodontic patients can benefit from maxillary

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

Orthodontic treatment for jaw defor. Sakamoto, T; Sakamoto, S; Harazaki, Author(s) Yamaguchi, H. Journal Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, 4

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

A Novel Method of Altering the Buccal Segment Relationship

Unilateral Horizontally Impacted Maxillary Canine and First Premolar Treated with a Double Archwire Technique

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

ANTERIOR AND CANINE RETRACTION: BIOMECHANIC CONSIDERATIONS. Part One

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Orthodontic treatment of midline diastema related to abnormal frenum attachment - A case series.

ORTHOdontics ORTHODONTIC LABORATORY

Dual Force Cuspid Retractor

Available online at International Journal of Current Research Vol. 10, Issue, 10, pp , October, 2018

clinical orthodontics article

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

Enhanced Control in the Transverse Dimension using the Unitek MIA Quad Helix System by Dr. Sven G. Wiezorek

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

REPRINTED FROM JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHODONTICS 1828 PEARL STREET, BOULDER, COLORADO Dr. Nanda Dr. Marzban Dr. Kuhlberg

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

Space Closure Biomechanics Applied Using The MBT System Technique

rocky mountain orthodontics functionaleducation

Anchorage system. tomas / Sets Page 270 tomas / Pins Page 271 Instruments and accessories Page 273 Patient consultation material Page 282

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

Canine Extrusion Technique with SmartClip Self-Ligating Brackets

System Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi

Sliding mechanics in an extraction case treated with 3M Clarity ADVANCED Ceramic Brackets and the 3M MBT Appliance System.

The Science Behind The System Clinical Abstracts, Volume 2

Holy Nexus of Variable Wire Cross-section: New Vistas in Begg s Technique

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

CLASS II CORRECTION SIMPLIFIED

ORTHODONTIC CORRECTION Of OCCLUSAL CANT USING MINI IMPLANTS:A CASE REPORT. Gupta J*, Makhija P.G.**, Jain V***

Buccally Malposed Mesially Angulated Maxillary Canine Management

Expansion/Arch Development

AAO / AAPD Scottsdale 2018

INDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required

HYCON DEVICE: A PRECISE AND CONTROLLED METHOD OF SPACE CLOSURE A CASE REPORT

Nonextraction treatment plans for Angle Class II

Correction of severe tooth rotation by using two different orthodontic appliances: Report of two cases

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

Molar distalisation with skeletal anchorage

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

Treatment of a Patient with Class I Malocclusion and Severe Tooth Crowding Using Invisalign and Fixed Appliances

With judicious treatment planning, the clinical

04 Inserting the HYCON TUBE

Interdisciplinary management of Impacted teeth in an adult with Orthodontics & Free Gingival graft : A Case Report

Treatment technique: A clinical & Practical sequences in the Management of Angle Class II Malocclusion (Maxillary Protrusion)

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

Angle Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary dental protrusion and missing mandibular first molars*

Molar anchorage loss has been shown to occur

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

Interceptive Orthodontic Treatment: Efficient Early Correction of Malocclusions

Checklist with summary points

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

Segmental Orthodontics for the Correction of Cross Bites

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

THE JASPER JUMPER APPLIANCE; USAGE, EFFECTS AND RECENT MODIFICATIONS

Class II correction with Invisalign - Combo treatments. Carriere Distalizer.

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

Plus Combines Traditional Twin Bracket Treatment With Self-Ligation Convenience

Crowding and protrusion treated by unusual extractions

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH CUSTOM MADE BILATERAL PALATAL DISTALIZER

Archwire Insertion and Disengagement Instruments Technique Guide

Instability of tooth alignment and occlusal relationships

An Innovative Treatment Approach with Atypical Orthodontic Extraction Pattern in Bimaxillary Protrusion Case

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

Mixed Dentition Treatment and Habits Therapy

THE USE OF VACCUM FORM RETAINERS FOR RELAPSE CORRECTION

Treatment of a malocclusion characterized

IJPCDR ORIGINAL RESEARCH ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

ORTHOdontics PGI/II SLIDING MECHANICS FOCUS ON TARGETED SPACE GAINING AND ITS APPLICATIONS, INCLUDING WITH RAPID PALATAL EXPANDIONS. ALSO INCLUDES RETENTION AND CLINICAL PEARLS FACULTY: Joseph Ghafari, DMD. Goals: This series of lectures should enable the resident to: 1. Learn approaches to gain, maintain, and relocate space within the arch based on increasing arch length and targeting the space needed with the use of differential connection of teeth adjacent to that location. 2. Learn applications of the space targeting method in a number of clinical situations, such as space opening associated with palatal expansion and asymmetric occlusal correction. 3. Understand the potential of sequential retraction or protraction of teeth, anchorage reinforcement, and deep bite correction in the context of problem resolution or patient non-compliance. 4. Understand practical issues related to fixed versus removable orthodontic retention. Objectives: The resident should know: 1. Various modalities of space gaining, including the space targeting method used to: a. develop space in specific areas of the arch; b. maintain space gained with rapid palatal expansion; c. correct unilateral distoclusion or mesioclusion, as well as midline deviation. 2. Various modalities to retract posterior teeth (in Class II occlusion) or protract teeth (in Class III relationship), sequentially. 3. The rationale and method of differential anchorage reinforcement with round wires. 4. The rationale and method of bite opening that allows extrusion of posterior teeth, also applied for the purpose of extruding anterior teeth. 5. The rationale and methods of removable retention of orthodontic results in comparison with fixed (bonded) retention. COURSE DURATION AND SCOPE: This course is part of the more encompassing series on

Orthodontic Methods under the wider heading of Mechanotherapy. The course is scheduled in the Spring or Summer of the first year and/or the Fall of the second year. It is given at a 2-hour session on a weekly basis for at least 5 sessions. POLICY ON EXAMINATIONS: At least 2 biannual examinations (progress and final) are given for all courses, if a course spans the entire year. If classes terminate before the end of a semester, the final examination is given at the semi-annual examination that is closest to the end of the course, unless the course director schedules the final examination earlier. During a course, any number of progress tests or assignments may be given. Their cumulative weight in proportion to the final grade may not exceed 50%. SLIDING MECHANICS SUMMARY OUTLINE -SLIDING MECHANICS AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH Targeted Space Gaining in crowding Targeted space opening associated with palatal expansion Asymmetric occlusal correction Sequential Retraction of Teeth Sequential Protraction of Teeth REINFORCEMENT THE DEEP OVERBITE 1-2. 3-4. 5- -ANCHORAGE -CORRECTING Posterior Extrusion Combined With Anterior Biteplate -REMOVABLE RETENTION 1- Maxillary 2- Mandibular COURSE OUTLINE Introduction Sliding mechanics imply the movement of single teeth, or a group of teeth, using round wires. In essence, the basic principle is a fundamental tenet of orthodontics: control of anchorage while minimizing frictional resistance in the active member of the appliance. The mechanics presented through treatment records in this series are based on using brackets with 0.022 x 0.028 slots. Proportionally smaller archwires would be used with smaller slots. The series includes the discussion of targeted space gaining in crowded arches or in association with rapid palatal expansion, asymmetric occlusal correction, sequential retraction and protraction of teeth, Anchorage for canine retraction, anchorage reinforcement, and removable retention. Many case reports will illustrate the author s development of specific mechanics for comprehensive tooth movement and retention.

1. MEANS OF SPACE GAINING WITHIN THE DENTAL ARCH A. Headgear B. Lip activated appliances (lip bumper) C. Open coil spring between teeth or groups of teeth D. Loops with vertical and horizontal legs E. Memory or smart wires (e.g. nickel titanium) 2. DESCRIPTION OF SPACE TARGETING TECHNIQUE Based on using brackets with 0.022 x 0.028 slots. Proportionally smaller archwires used with smaller slots. A. Light stainless steel archwire (0.014, at most 0.016 ) bent to increase arch length (through vertical loops mesial to 1 st premolars). B. Before engagement wire lies 1-1.5mm in front of incisor brackets (depending on amount of space to be gained and patient s force tolerance): incisors will procline and space would develop equally among them. C. Space opening targeted to specific area by differential connection of groups of teeth on either side of this area. 3. PRESERVING SPACE FROM PALATAL EXPANSION Same principle applied with maxillary rapid expansion if space gaining indicated for tooth alignment. Rationale: save entire new space developed through expansion (otherwise may close partially or completely as incisors move back to original position by stretch of septal fibers). Components: A. Brackets bonded on maxillary incisors 1 week after expansion initiated. B. 2 segmental nitinol wires (0.016 ) inserted in central and lateral incisors, separating right and left segments. C. Stainless steel archwire (0.014 ) with increased arch length through stops mesial to 1 st premolars anticipates space increase from activation of expanding jack screw. d. Follow-up procedures. 4. ASYMMETRIC OCCLUSAL CORRECTION Unilateral tooth movement achieved with same type of mechanics modified to favor movement on the side where the canines, premolars, and molars are short of neutroclusion. Suitable condition: A. Mandibular midline off and mandibular canine, premolars and molars short of neutroclusion (cusp to cusp or end to end relationship-class II tendency), and need forward movement to achieve a Class 1 (correction by unilateral distal movement of opposing maxillary teeth ruled out).

B. Maxillary midline off and maxillary canine, premolars and molars in Class III relationship and require forward movement toward neutroclusion (unilateral distal movement of corresponding mandibular teeth discarded). Treatment plan: Shift teeth to one side of the arch to make midlines coincide and achieve neutroclusion on the side lacking this relationship. 5. SEQUENTIAL MOVEMENT OF TEETH A. Sequential retraction of teeth Distal movement of teeth, particularly molars, premolars, and canines, individually. a. After initial alignment of teeth, build up to heavier round wires (0.018 stainless steel). b. Open coil spring inserted between maxillary molars. When second molar is distalized, next maxillary archwire with (helix) mesial to maxillary 2 nd molar tube to avoid its mesial tipping (tip back adds to anchorage). On opposite side: stop bent mesial to 1 st premolar to maintain new arch length. (If both 2 nd molars distalized, stops mesial to both teeth). c. Retract 1 st molar with coil spring between it and 2 nd premolar. Class II elastics, if used, are best hooked to maxillary 2 nd and/or 1 st premolar (pressure through contact points better transmitted to more distal teeth). d. Retract 2 nd premolar (once 1 st molar adjacent to 2 nd molar, both teeth are tied together with steel ligature (or new wire inserted with stop mesial to 1 st molar), and elastomeric chain stretched to 2 nd premolar to move it distally. Same mechanics repeated when this tooth is adjacent to 1 st molar to distalize 1 st premolar. e. Retract canine after consolidating anchorage of molars and premolars with stainless steel ligature or by tying stops (vertical helices) bent mesial to 1 st premolars to brackets of these teeth. After canine retraction, new archwire bent to retract incisors. f. Tip back may be maintained for 2 nd molar to secure crown at more distal position until 1 st molar and premolars (possibly canine) are retracted. g. Variants of method, when posterior teeth are distalized before full arch bonding: modified maxillary Nance or mandibular lingual holdings appliances. h. Fixed anchorage methods have advantage over initial use of removable appliances (ACCO type appliances) as relapse in a mesial direction with initial archwires is a documented risk.

B. Sequential protraction of teeth a. Teeth are protracted sequentially (preferably on 0.018 stainless steel archwire), maintaining arch length with posterior stops (at molar or premolar levels), while teeth moved individually forward. b. If most posteriorly banded teeth are 2 nd molars, stops bent mesial to these teeth, and canines, premolars, and 1 st molars moved forward. c. Then, stopless wire to protract 2 nd molars against heavier anchorage from teeth anterior to them. Movement may be buttressed by interarch elastics, Class 2 elastics if mandibular teeth protracted; Class 3 elastics for maxillary teeth. C. Anchorage reinforcement a. In sequential retraction or protraction of teeth, anchorage may be reinforced by adding on anchoring unit of appliance a 2 nd round wire to the main archwire:0.014 wire to a 0.018 wire, when bracket slot is 0.022 x 0.028. b. Other combinations: 0.016 + 0.016, or 0.014 + 0.016). Tooth moved only on heavier of 2 wires. (Concept close to differential anchorage of bidimensional appliance). REMOVABLE RETENTION A. MAXILLARY 1. Rationale: wrap around versus Hawley 2. Wrap around soldered on Adam s clasps B. MANDIBULAR 1. Rationale: difference between fixed and removable retainer 2. Tooth Aligner with Premolar Extension (TAPE) a- components b- adjustment 3. The fixed bonded 3-3: variations and applications REFERENCES 1. Ghafari J. Timing the early treatment of Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion: Clinical and research considerations. Clin Orthod and Res. 1998;1:118-29., 2. Ghafari J. A lip-activated appliance in early orthodontic treatment. J Am Dent Associ 1985; 111:771-4. 3. McDonald JL, Shofer FS, Ghafari J. Effect of molar rotation on arch length. Clin Orthod & Res 2001; 4:79-85.

4. Ghafari J. Early treatment of dental arch problems: I. Space maintenance, space gaining. Quintessence Intern, 1986; 17:423-32. 5. Proffit W. Mechanical principles in orthodontic force control. In: Contemporary Orthodontics, 3 rd edition. Eds. W.R. Proffit, H.W. Fields, Jr. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000:126-61. 6. Bishara SE, Staley RN. Maxillary expansion: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 91:3-14. 7. Lamparski DG Jr, Rinchuse DJ, Close JM, Sciote JJ. Comparison of skeletal and dental changes between 2-point and 4-point rapid palatal expanders. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:321-8. 8. Ghafari J. Modified Nance and lingual appliances for unilateral tooth movement. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 19:30-34, 1985. (Also, reprinted in Oral Health 1986; 76:35-57. 9. Cetlin NM, Spena R, Vanarsdall RL Jr. Nonextraction treatment. In: Orthodontics, Current Principles and Techniques. 3 rd Edition. Eds: T. Graber, RL Vanarsdall Jr. Mosby: St. Louis. 2000; 749-77. 10. Gianelly AA. Bidimensional Technique. GAC International, 2000.