A Case Report on Clinical Management of Impacted Maxillary Cuspid and Bicuspid through Surgical Exposure and Orthodontic Alignment

Similar documents
Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Unilateral Horizontally Impacted Maxillary Canine and First Premolar Treated with a Double Archwire Technique

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

Interdisciplinary management of Impacted teeth in an adult with Orthodontics & Free Gingival graft : A Case Report

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Treatment of a Horizontally Impacted Permanent Incisor in a 9-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Delayed of eruption of a permanent maxillary

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

An estimated 25-30% of all orthodontic patients can benefit from maxillary

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

An Innovative Treatment Approach with Atypical Orthodontic Extraction Pattern in Bimaxillary Protrusion Case

Nonextraction Treatment of Upper Canine Premolar Transposition in an Adult Patient

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Treatment of a Patient with Class I Malocclusion and Severe Tooth Crowding Using Invisalign and Fixed Appliances

eral Maxillary y Molar Distalization with Sliding Mechanics: Keles Slider

Correction of a maxillary canine-first premolar transposition using mini-implant anchorage

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

Management of Crowded Class 1 Malocclusion with Serial Extractions: Report of a Case

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

SURGICAL - ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION IN AN ADULT PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

Extractions of first permanent molars in orthodontics: Treatment planning, technical considerations and two clinical case reports

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

Controlled tooth movement to correct an iatrogenic problem

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

Orthodontic Treatment of a Patient with an Impacted Maxillary Second Premolar and Odontogenic Keratocyst in the Maxillary Sinus

Orthodontic treatment of midline diastema related to abnormal frenum attachment - A case series.

Early Mixed Dentition Period

DonnishJournals

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

Delayed formation of multiple supernumerary teeth

Nonextraction Management of Class II Malocclusion Using Powerscope: A Case Report

THE USE OF VACCUM FORM RETAINERS FOR RELAPSE CORRECTION

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Treatment of a severe class II division 1 malocclusion with twin-block appliance

Management of Ectopically Erupting Maxillary Incisors: A Case Series

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

Management of Congenitally Missing Lateral Incisor

Buccally Malposed Mesially Angulated Maxillary Canine Management

Nonextraction Treatment of Class I Malocclusion having Anterior Crowding and Multiple Canine Impactions

ORTHODONTIC INTERVENTION IN MIXED DENTITION: A BOON FOR PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

Maxillary canine first premolar bilateral transposition in a Class III patient: A case report

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgical Correction of a Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Treatment of a Patient with an Impacted Transmigrant Mandibular Canine and a Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canine

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

S.H. Age: 15 Years 3 Months Diagnosis: Class I Nonextraction Severe crowding, very flat profile. Background:

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Treatment of a malocclusion characterized

Dual Force Cuspid Retractor

Angle Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary dental protrusion and missing mandibular first molars*

Management of three impacted teeth detected early

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

Transverse malocclusion, posterior crossbite and severe discrepancy*

Volume 22 No. 14 September Dentists, Federally Qualified Health Centers and Health Maintenance Organizations For Action

ORTHODONTIC CORRECTION Of OCCLUSAL CANT USING MINI IMPLANTS:A CASE REPORT. Gupta J*, Makhija P.G.**, Jain V***

Hypodontia is the developmental absence of at

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

Crowding and protrusion treated by unusual extractions

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Invisalign technique in the treatment of adults with pre-restorative concerns

Ortho-surgical Management of Severe Vertical Dysplasia: A Case Report

JCO-Online Copyright 2010

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH MODIFIED GRAZ IMPLANT SUPPORTED PENDULUM SPRINGS. A CASE REPORT.

ISW for the Treatment of Bilateral Posterior Buccal Crossbite

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH CUSTOM MADE BILATERAL PALATAL DISTALIZER

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

Significant improvement with limited orthodontics anterior crossbite in an adult patient

With judicious treatment planning, the clinical

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

Case Report Orthodontic Treatment of a Mandibular Incisor Extraction Case with Invisalign

Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) prior to combined Le Fort I and sagittal osteotomies: A case report

Transcription:

Science Letters ISSN 2345-5463 Science An Letters International 2018; Triannually 6(2):62-66 Journal Case report 2018 Volume 6 Issue 2 Pages 62-66 A R T I C L E I N F O Received April 12, 2018 Accepted June 09, 2018 Published August 10, 2018 *Corresponding Author Junqing Ma E-mail jma@njmu.edu.cn Phone +86-25-85031976 Keywords Maxillary cuspid Impacted tooth Orthodontic alignment Orthodontic intervention How to Cite Al Jabri M, Guo S, Mengnan Z, Wang L, Ma J. A case report on clinical management of impacted maxillary cuspid and bicuspid through surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment. Sci Lett 2018; 6(2):62-66 Open Access A Case Report on Clinical Management of Impacted Maxillary Cuspid and Bicuspid through Surgical Exposure and Orthodontic Alignment Mehjabeen Al Jabri, Shuyu Guo, Zhang Mengnan, Lin Wang, Junqing Ma* Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, 210029, Nanjing, China Abstract The term impacted tooth refers to any tooth, which fails to erupt in the oral cavity. Impacted canines are usually examined in the oral cavity by an orthodontist during day to day practice and it can be corrected through an interdisciplinary approach. It is advisable to do the early diagnosis and treatment plan for impacted teeth in order to acquire descent posttreatment results. It is quite challenging for an orthodontist to do the treatment of impacted teeth and acquire stable results. This case report addresses the orthodontic management of a 14 year old female patient with unilateral palatally impacted maxillary canine and buccally impacted first premolar impaction. The treatment protocol involved two phases of which one was surgical orthodontic intervention and the other was orthodontic intervention. In phase I, exposure of impacted canine by raising periodontal flap was carried out and the Nance palatal appliance was used to guide the eruption of canine. In phase II, fixed orthodontic appliance was used. The total time required for active treatment was 24 months. The purpose of this case study was to address the early diagnosis of impacted teeth and also to achieve proper alignment, occlusion and esthetics by an interdisciplinary approach by utilizing various mechanical tactics. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. Scan QR code to see this publication on your mobile device. 62

Introduction Any tooth, which aborts to erupt in the dental arch within a definite time, is referred to as impacted tooth [1]. Teeth, which are commonly impacted include: third molars, maxillary canines, maxillary premolars and central incisors. Disturbances in the eruption of teeth are diversification of normal eruption of the tooth, which includes accelerated, deferred, failed or deviated direction of the regular tooth eruption [2]. In contemporary orthodontics, the treatment of impacted tooth remains a challenge to the orthodontist. Treatment procedure of such cases includes surgical exposure, guided orthodontic and traction to align the impacted tooth in the dental arch. Most common complications of such cases are a gingival recession, root resorption and bone loss [3]. The rate of incidence of impacted maxillary canine and maxillary premolar is approximately 2% and 0.5%, respectively, in the general population [4, 5]. Usually, the impacted teeth are responsible for some problems such as aesthetic dissonance, decreased masticatory ability and difficulty in maintaining oral hygiene. In addition to these, when impacted in the extreme proximity of antral and nasal cavities maxillary premolar is expected to cause complications, which may lead to surgical intervention. Moreover, the dentigerous cyst is also seen in association with impacted teeth [6]. Many etiologic factors are suspected for impacted canines and premolars, but the arch length discrepancy is supposed to be the most common and primary etiologic factor [7]. This case report describes the successful treatment of a patient with impacted maxillary canine and premolar and was corrected by utilizing orthodontic treatment. The treatment was done to correct orthodontic alignment of all the teeth in the dental arch to achieve the proper occlusion and improve the esthetics and masticatory function of the patient. Case presentation A 14-year-old female patient visited our orthodontic department of the stomatological hospital in Jiangsu province with the chief complaint of the unerupted tooth in the upper front tooth region. Upon doing an intraoral examination, all permanent teeth erupted except the maxillary and mandibular third molars left maxillary canine and first premolar. Further, a retained deciduous left maxillary canine was found. Mild crowding in relation to mandibular anterior teeth, overjet of 3 mm and overbite of 3.5 mm was recorded when in occlusion and the mandibular first molars were in class I relationship. The dental midline of maxillary dentition was deviated towards the right by 1 mm and midline of mandibular dentition was concordant with a face. Extraoral examination revealed that she had roughly symmetric, slightly dolichocephalic, leptoproscopic face with 3 mm of interlabial gap with lip incompetence. There was no past medical or orthodontic treatment history. Treatment objectives The primary objective of orthodontic treatment for this patient was to guide the eruption of palatally impacted maxillary canine and labially impacted maxillary first premolar, to level and align both the arches, reduce the overjet and overbite to normal, and achieve Class I canine relation bilaterally. Considering the patient s age and soft tissue profile, the use of Nance palatal appliance was determined and also not to extract any teeth. The treatment plan was to expose the canine surgically followed by bonding the attachment and to bond the buccally erupted the first premolar so that desired position could be obtained for both the teeth. Almost after the desired position is obtained for both canine and premolar, Nance palatal retainer would be removed and upper and lower arch would be bonded and the finishing of inter-arch would be achieved. Treatments used After clinical and radiological examination, the custom-made Nance palatal appliance was prepared for the particular patient. Phase I-surgical orthodontic intervention The mucoperiosteal flap was raised in order to expose the canine for bonding the attachment and then the flap was surgically repositioned (Fig. 1). Nance palatal appliance also called as repositioning Nance appliance (RNA) is a fixed functional appliance that consists of bands on upper first molars, which are joined along with stainless steel wire of 0.036 inches and is bent around the anterior region of the hard palate near the rugae area lingually to the upper incisors. There is an acrylic Nance button attached to the wire. Both the canine and maxillary first premolar was bonded to the attachment so that the desired position of both the teeth could be achieved. Between 2.5 to 3 months of time period, the canine was clinically visible (Fig. 2). 63

Fig. 1 Pretreatment photographs. (A) Facial front; (B) facial front smiling; (C) facial ¾ right; (D) facial profile; (E) intra oral (mandibular); (F) intra oral left; (G) intra oral front; (H) intra oral right; (I) intra oral maxillary; (J) lateral cephalogram; (G) orthopantamogram. Phase II-post surgical orthodontic intervention At the end of 6 months, the labial surface of maxillary canine was completely exposed and clinically visible and space was created for it (Fig. 3). At this stage, the maxillary and mandibular arches were bonded with 0.022 MBT metallic edgewise brackets. Niti (Nickel-Titanium) 0.014" round archwire was applied to both maxillary and mandibular arch. At 12 months, Niti spring was applied from maxillary right lateral incisor to maxillary right first premolar to maintain the space for alignment of the maxillary canine to its proper position in the maxillary arch (Fig. 3). At 18 months, the canine and maxillary premolars were Fig. 2 Nance palatal appliance to guide the eruption of impacted maxillary canine. aligned to their respective positions and the occlusal was maintained with the use of class II elastics. Archwire was changed every 2 months for maxillary arches starting from 0.014 inch round Niti archwire and later replaced by 0.018 0.022 rectangular Niti archwire (Fig. 4). For mandibular arch, every month from 0.014 inches round Niti archwire and later replaced by 0.017 0.25 inch Niti rectangular archwire. After appropriate alignment, leveling, detailing and finishing were done. The occlusion was allocated to settle down and class I molar relationship was achieved bilaterally and then the brackets were deboned. The lingual bonded retainer was used for retention in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Total time for active treatment was 24 months. Pretreatment and post-treatment comparison of the cephalometric measurements is given in Table 1. Discussion Maxillary canines and premolars are essential for an aesthetic smile and functional efficiency. Owing to this reason, extraction of these teeth is contraindicated. Impaction of these teeth may lead to alteration in occlusion, aesthetics, functioning and maintenance of oral hygiene. Sometimes, the impacted tooth is also responsible for the underlying pathology such as odontogenic cyst and there are also reports of Adenomatous odontogenic 64

12 months 18 months Fig. 3 Treatment progress at 12 months and 18 months. (A) Facial front; (B) facial front smiling; (C) facial ¾ right; (D) facial profile; (E) intra oral (mandibular); (F) intra oral left; (G) intra oral front; (H) intra oral right; (I) intra oral maxillary. 24 months Post treatments Fig. 4 Treatment progress at 24 months and post-treatment. (A) Facial front; (B) facial front smiling; (C) facial ¾ right; (D) facial profile; (E) intra oral (mandibular); (F) intra oral left; (G) intra oral front; (H) intra oral right; (I) intra oral maxillary. tumors. In addition to these factors, these teeth are mostly found on the palatal aspect because of this the diagnosis is further delayed as patient complains only after experiencing pain [8, 9]. Etiologic factors commonly associated with impacted canines and premolars are either systemic or local, which includes: arch length discrepancy, early loss of deciduous molars causing the mesial drift and underlying pathological lesions such as dentigerous cyst etc. [10]. According to previous studies, many approaches have been used to align the impacted canine and premolars [11, 12]. But in the contemporary case report, the palatally impacted maxillary canine was aligned by utilizing Nance palatal appliance also called as repositioning Nance appliance (RNA). The RNA, which is fixed a functional appliance, if utilized appropriately according to the requirement of the case, best results can be obtained for both the patient and practitioner [13]. In this case, firstly to move the canine away from the roots of lateral incisor was a necessity in order to minimize the damage to its 65

Table 1 Pretreatment and post-treatment comparison of the cephalometric measurements. Measured values Pretreatmentreatment Post- Normal SNB(º) 86.5 84.1 82.5 SNB (º) 79.7 81.2 80.9 ANB (º) 6.9 3.5 1.6 FH-NPo (º) 85.5 81.5 80.6 FMA (º) 30.8 26.5 25.0 SN-GoGn (º) 38.2 35.0 32.9 Y-Axis (º) 66.0 61.0 60.0 LAFH (º) 53.0 56.6 55.0 U1-L1(º) 133.8 128.0 130.8 U1-NA (º) 14.6 22.3 22.8 U1-NA (linear)(mm) 4.6 5.6 6.0 L1-NB (º) 28.7 25.3 22.0 L1-NB (linear)(mm) 8.7 6.0 4.0 L1 to A-Po line (mm) 4.8 2.9 2.7 S-Line (mm) 4.5 3.0 2.0 G-Sn-Po (º) 22.8 15.0 12.0 roots. About 11 months of time was needed for complete traction of the impacted canine and the total time for active treatment was about 24 months in this case. But according to various reports the duration of time for complete traction and alignment of canines varies because of gender, age, the severity of impaction, unilateral and bilateral impaction and molar relation. The challenging tooth movements can be carried out by properly understanding the application of biomechanics and biologic principles. It was clinically challenging to guide the eruption of impacted maxillary canine and to align the maxillary first premolar. By utilizing RNA and progressive traction of the impacted tooth with gentle orthodontic forces were successful tactics to acquire the proper occlusion. Acknowledgments This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371179), The Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20150048), and the Priority Academic Program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (2014-37). Conflict of interest The authors have no conflict of interest References [1] Trivedi B, Jayam C, Bandlapalli A, Patel N. Surgical and orthodontic management of a horizontally impacted permanent mandibular canine: timing is vital. BMJ Case Rep 2014; 2014:bcr2014205052 [2] Sukh R, Singh GP, Tandon P. Interdisciplinary approach for the management of bilaterally impacted maxillary canines. Contemp Clin Dent 2014; 5(4):539 544. [3] Manne R, Gandikota CS, Juvvadi SR, Rama HRM, Anche S. Impacted canines: Etiology, diagnosis, and orthodontic management. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012; 4(Suppl 2):S234 S238. [4] Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101(2):159-71. [5] Manjunatha BS, Chikkaramaiah S, Panja P, Koratagere N. Impacted maxillary second premolars: a report of four cases. BMJ Case Rep 2014; 2014:bcr2014205206. [6] Kasat VO, Saluja H, Kalburge JV, Kini Y, Nikam A, Laddha R. Multiple bilateral supernumerary mandibular premolars in a non-syndromic patient with associated orthokeratised odontogenic cyst - A case report and review of literature. Contem clin Dent 2012; 3(Suppl 2):S248-52. [7] Ericson S, Kurol J. Early treatment of palatally erupting maxillary canines by extraction of the primary canines. Eur J Orthod 1988; 10(4):283-95. [8] Campos CA, Durr DP. A combination of impacted supernumerary tooth, inverted impacted premolar, and dentigerous cyst--a case report. Quintessence Int Dent 1980; 11(2):9-10. [9] Vanarsdall RL, Corn H. Soft-tissue management of labially positioned unerupted teeth. Am J Orthod 1977; 72(1):53-64. [10] Ishihara Y, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yamashiro T. Patient with nonsyndromic bilateral and multiple impacted teeth and dentigerous cysts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141(2):228-41. [11] Katiyar R, Singh GP, Tandon P. A cantilever spring for alignment of buccally impacted canines. J Clin Orthod 2012; 46(6):354-5. [12] Park HS, Oh YH. Forced eruption of a labially impacted canine using joined micro-implants. J Clin Orthod 2010; 44(2):108-13. [13] Dawjee SM, Khan MI, Hlongwa P. The repositioning Nance appliance: a fixed functional appliance and case report. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2009; 8(1):68 73. 66