CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING THERAPHY

Similar documents
HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Supplementary Online Content

Expert Meeting on Large Simple Trials (LST s)

How would you manage Ms. Gold

journal of medicine The new england Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men and Women with Elevated C-Reactive Protein Abstract

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

BLOOD PRESSURE-LOWERING TREATMENT

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

Landmark Clinical Trials.

Drug Class Review HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins) and Fixed-dose Combination Products Containing a Statin

Lessons from Recent Atherosclerosis Trials

Supplementary Online Content

Ezetimibe and SimvastatiN in Hypercholesterolemia EnhANces AtherosClerosis REgression (ENHANCE)

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

All medications are a double-edged sword with risks

Antiplatelet Therapy in Primary CVD Prevention and Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Καρακώστας Γεώργιος Διευθυντής Καρδιολογικής Κλινικής, Γ.Ν.

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

Introduction. Objective. Critical Questions Addressed

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

Cholesterol lowering intervention for cardiovascular prevention in high risk patients with or without LDL cholesterol elevation

03/30/2016 DISCLOSURES TO OPERATE OR NOT THAT IS THE QUESTION CAROTID INTERVENTION IS INDICATED FOR ASYMPTOMATIC CAROTID OCCLUSIVE DISEASE

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

Experiences with interim trial monitoring, particularly with early stopped trials

ESC Geoffrey Rose Lecture on Population Sciences Cholesterol and risk: past, present and future

Landmesser U et al. Eur Heart J 2017; /eurheartj/ehx549

JAMA. 2011;305(24): Nora A. Kalagi, MSc

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

Marshall Tulloch-Reid, MD, MPhil, DSc, FACE Epidemiology Research Unit Tropical Medicine Research Institute The University of the West Indies, Mona,

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors - what have we learnt? Philip Barter The Heart Research Institute Sydney, Australia

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

Lipid Management 2013 Statin Benefit Groups

Effective Treatment Options With Add-on or Combination Therapy. Christie Ballantyne (USA)

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

The updated guidelines from the National

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

The IMPROVE-IT trial (ezetimibe added to simvastatin for acute coronary syndrome). A critical appraisal. abstract

AIM HIGH for SATURN and stay SHARP; COURAGE (v1.5)

Cardiovascular Event Reduction Versus New-Onset Diabetes During Atorvastatin Therapy

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

CANADIAN STROKE BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS. Prevention of Stroke Evidence Tables Lipid Management

LOW DOSE ASPIRIN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE FOR PROPHYLAXIS OF FOR BACKGROUND USE ONLY NOT TO BE USED IN DETAILING

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Changing lipid-lowering guidelines: whom to treat and how low to go

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

5/2/2016. Outpatient Stroke Management Sheila Smith MD May 5, 2016

Supplementary Online Content

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

New Guidelines in Dyslipidemia Management

Beyond Framingham: Risk Assessment & Treatment for Primary Prevention

Session : Why do stroke patients need a cardiologist? PREVALENCE OF CORONARY ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL INFARCTION

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Controversies in Lipid Therapy: Is there any value in adjusting HDL levels?

2016 ESC/EAS Guideline in Dyslipidemias: Impact on Treatment& Clinical Practice

Drug Class Review on HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins)

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN DEATHS FROM CHD! PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

STATINS FOR PAD Long - term prognosis

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients: ODYSSEY LONG TERM

Should I use statins?

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

Chapter 2: Pharmacological cholesterol-lowering treatment in adults Kidney International Supplements (2013) 3, ; doi: /kisup.2013.

Traitements associés chez l hypertendu: Statines, Aspirine

The Effect of Statin Therapy on Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage

Common Repatha Documentation Requirements for Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia and Established CVD 1,2

Young high risk patients the role of statins Dr. Mohamed Jeilan

The role of statins in patients with arterial hypertension

Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Kevin M Hayes D.O. F.A.C.C. First Coast Heart and Vascular Center

An example of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Statins for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women: Review of the Evidence

Protecting the heart and kidney: implications from the SHARP trial

CETP inhibition: pros and cons. Philip Barter The Heart Research Institute Sydney, Australia

rosuvastatin, 5mg, 10mg, 20mg, film-coated tablets (Crestor ) SMC No. (725/11) AstraZeneca UK Ltd.

Drug Prior Authorization Guideline PCSK9 Inhibitors -

9/29/2015. Primary Prevention of Heart Disease: Objectives. Objectives. What works? What doesn t?

Disclosures No relationships (not even to an employer) No off-label uses. Cholesterol Lowering Guidelines: What now?

Diabetes mellitus type 2 and angina pectoris : novel insights in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment Wiersma, J.J.

Table of Contents. American Heart Association, Inc., and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. 1

Coronary artery disease remains the leading

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

Approach to Dyslipidemia among diabetic patients

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

Data Alert. Vascular Biology Working Group. Blunting the atherosclerotic process in patients with coronary artery disease.

Is there an association between atherosclerosis and chronic venous disease?

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Statins in the elderly: What evidence of their benefit in prevention?

surtout qui n est PAS à risque?

APPENDIX B: LIST OF THE SELECTED SECONDARY STUDIES

Transcription:

CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING THERAPHY TRIALS NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS NUMBER OF WOMEN PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MEAN AGE MEAN - (YEARS) TRIALS WITH ANALYSIS BY GENDER N, (%) 50,194 15,036 30.0% 60.8 3.2 1/ 6 (16.7%) HR SPARCL (Amarenco et al 77 ) AUG 2006 (Country) with significant European component in patients who had had a stroke or TIA within one to six months before study entry, had lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of 100 to 190 mg per deciliter (2.6 to 4.9 mmol per liter), and had no known coronary heart disease mean ± sd, range 62.5 ± 0.2 ATORVA STATIN 63.0 ± 0.2 TOTAL n,%) 4731 : 1908, 40.3%) (MEN: 2823) DURATION TOTAL n,%) (MEN n,%) 4.9 years ATORVASTATIN (80 mg per day) A first nonfatal or fatal stroke 311 (13.1 %) ATORVASTAT IN 265 (11.2 %) (CI) P (MEN ) 5-year absolute reduction in risk: 2.2 % HR ADJUSTED = 0.84 0.71-0.99] P = 0.03 P UNADJUSTED = 0.05 APPENDIX 4 1

HR TNT (Waters et al 78 ) ILLUMIN ATE (Barter et al 79 ) NOV 2006 NOV 2007 with significant European component in patients with documented coronary disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels substantially below 100 mg/dl. with significant European component in patients at high cardiovascular risk 60.9 ± 8.8 ATORVA STATIN (10 mg/day) 61.2 ± 8.8 ATORVA STATIN (80 mg/day) 10001 : 1902, 19%) (MEN: 8099) (RANGE: 35-75) 61.3 ± 7.6 15067 : 3352, 22.2%) (MEN: 11715) 4.9 years 550 days ATORVASTATIN (10 mg/day) ATORVASTATIN (80 mg/day) ATORVASTATIN ALONE TORCETRAPIB PLUS ATORVASTATIN Cerebrovascular Time to the first major cardiovascular event (defined as death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina) Cerebrovascular event: ATORVASTAT IN (10 mg/day): 252 (5.0%) ATORVASTAT IN (80 mg/day): 196 (3.9%) ATORVASTAT IN-ONLY: 373 TORCETRAPIB PLUS ATORVASTATI N: 464 Cerebrovascular event: HR =.77 0.64 0.93] P = 0.007 HR = 1.25 1.09-1.44] P = 0.001 Trial terminated prematurely because of an increased risk of death and cardiac in patients receiving torcetrapib. APPENDIX 4 2

HR ENHANCE (Kastelein et al 80 ) SEAS (Rossebø et al 81 ) APRIL 2008 SEPT 2008 conducted at 18 ambulatory care centers in the United States, Canada, South Africa, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands in patients with familial hypercholesterolemi a conducted at 173 study sites in seven European countries in patients with mild-tomoderate, asymptomatic aortic stenosis 45.7 ± 10.0 SIMVAST ATIN MONOTH ERAPY 46.1 ± 9.0 SIMVAST ATIN PLUS EZETIMI BE 67.4 ± 9.7 SIMVAST ATIN EZETIMI BE 67.7 ± 9.4 (RANGE: 45-85) 720 : 350, 48.6%) (MEN: 370) 1873 : 723, 38.6%) (MEN: 1150) 24 months Daily therapy with SIMVASTATIN (80 mg of daily) WITH SIMVASTATIN with EZETIMIBE (10 mg) 52.2 months SIMVASTATIN (40 mg daily) plus EZETIMIBE (10 mg daily) Change in the mean carotid-artery intima media thickness, which was defined as the average of the means of the far-wall intima media thickness of the right and left common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries Major cardiovascular ( including death from cardiovascular causes, aortic-valve replacement, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris, heart failure, coronary-artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, and nonhemorrhagic stroke) SIMVASTATI N-ONLY: 0.0058 ± 0.0037 mm SIMVASTATI N-PLUS- EZETIMIBE: combinedtherapy) 0.0111 ± 0.0038 mm : 355 (38.2%) SIMVASTATIN EZETIMIBE : 333 (35.3%) Difference between mean (±SE) in he simvastatin-only group and in the combined-therapy group = 0.0053 mm P = 0.29 HR= 0.96 0.83-1.12] P = 0.59 In the simvastatin ezetimibe group, incident cancer was diagnosed in 105 patients (11.1%), as compared with 70 patients (7.5%) in the placebo group (P = 0.01) APPENDIX 4 3

HR JITER (Ridker et al 82 ) NOV 2008 conducted at 1315 sites in 26 countries in apparently healthy men and women with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) and highsensitivity C-reactive protein levels of 2.0 mg per liter or higher Inclusion criteria: Men age > 50 years Women > 60 years Median 66.0 (nterquartil e range 60.0 71.0) 17802 : 6801, 38.2%) (MEN: 11001) 1.9 years (maximal: 5.0 years) ROSUVASTATIN (20 mg daily) Myocardial infarction or stroke or arterial revascularization or hospitalization for unstable angina or death from cardiovascular causes : 251 ROSUVASTATI N: 142 HR = 0.56 0.46-0.69] P<0.00001 HR WOMEN = 0.54 HR MEN = 0.58 P INTERACTION = 0.80 Prematurely stopped for an excess of in the placebo group Similar effect in men and women APPENDIX 4 4

HR JITER (Glynn et al 83 ) APRIL 2009 conducted at 1315 sites in 26 countries apparently healthy men and women with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) and highsensitivity C- reactive protein levels of 2.0 mg per liter or higher. Inclusion criteria: Men age > 50 years Women > 60 years Median 66.0 Interquartil e range 60.0 71.0 17802 : 6801, 38.2%) (MEN: 11001) 1.9 years (maximum, 5.0) ROSUVASTATIN (20 mg/day) First occurrence of pulmonary embolism or deepvein thrombosis Symptomatic venous thromboembolis m : 94 : 60 ROSUVASTATI N: 34 WOMEN: 28/6801 ( 0.4%) MEN: 66/11001 ( 0.6%) Symptomatic venous thromboembolism HR TOTAL = 0.57 [95%CI: 0.37-0.86] P = 0.007 Incidence Rate in Subgroup Placebo: IR WOMEN = 0.24 IR MEN = 0.37 P INTERACTION > 0.10 Consistent effects were observed in all the subgroups examined (sex included). No significant differences were seen between treatment groups in the rates of bleeding episodes Pulmonary embolism: Pulmonary embolism: : 22 ROSUVASTATI N: 17 HR =0.77 [95%CI: 0.41 1.45] P = 0.42 Deep-vein thrombosis only: : 38 ROSUVASTATI N: 17 Deep-vein thrombosis only: HR =0.45 [95%CI: 0.25 0.79] P = 0.004 APPENDIX 4 5

META-ANALYSIS HR Statins and gender metaanalysis (Peretta et al 86 ) [epub ahead of print] SEPT 2008 (Country) Meta-analysis including 8 randomized controlled trials of patients without known cardiovascular disease mean ± sd, range TOTAL n,%) 49246 : 19052, (63%)) (MEN: 30194) DURATION TOTAL n,%) (MEN n,%) Mean of 3.9 years (2.8- to 5.3 year) STATINS OR USUAL CARE OR DIET At least 1 clinical outcome: total mortality, coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction,chd (defined as CHD mortality, nonfatal MI, unstable angina, or sudden cardiac death) revascularization procedures NOT REPORTED (CI) P (MEN ) Total mortality: RR WOMEN = 0.96 [95%CI: 0.81 1.13] RR MEN = 0.93 [95%CI: 0.83 1.04] Coronary heart disease (CHD): RR WOMEN = 0.89 [95%CI: 0.79 1.00] RR MEN = 0.59; [95%CI: 0.48 0.74] Effects on total mortality non significant in both women and men Effects of CHD significant in men, weakly significant in women APPENDIX 4 6

HR Meta- Analysis on Statins and Reduction in Risk of Cardiovasc ular Outcomes (Delahoy et al 85 ) FEB 2009 Meta-regression analysis of twentyfive randomized Trials of statins > 18 155613 4.2 years Statins : placebo controlled, active controlled, or usual care Cardiovascular end points: vascular mortality, major coronary [defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction or coronary heart disease death], major vascular [defined as major coronary event, fatal or nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization], fatal and nonfatal stroke Primary analysis: (25 trials) 6321 vascular deaths 23791 major vascular 11357 major coronary 4717 fatal and nonfatal strokes. For every 25- mg/dl reduction in LDL-C: Primary analysis: Vascular mortality: RR = 0.89 0.87-0.92] r 2 = 0.75 Major coronary RR = 0.84 0.82-0.86] r 2 = 0.87 Major vascular RR = 0.86 0.84-0.88] r 2 = 0.84 Percentage of woman enrolled not Fatal and nonfatal stroke: RR = 0.90 0.86-0.94] r 2 = 0.47 APPENDIX 4 7

HR Benefits of statins in people without established cardiovasc ular disease but with cardiovasc ular risk factors (Brugts et al 87 ) JUN 2009 Meta-analysis of 10 randomised trials in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors 63 years (range: 55.3 to 75.0) 70388 : 23681 (34%)) (MEN: 46707) Mean of 4.1 years (range: 1.9 to 5.3). Statins compared with controls (placebo, active control, or usual care) Mortality and major cardiovascular disease Secondary end points the composite of major coronary (defined as death from coronary heart disease and non-fatal myocardial infarction), and the composite of major cerebrovascular (defined as fatal and non-fatal stroke) All cause mortality (based on mean follow-up of 4.1 years, with data from nine trials, and 67476 patients free of cardiovascular disease) TOTAL CONTROL: 1925/33793 (5.7%) STATIN: 1725/33683 (5.1%) OR TOTAL = 0.88 0.81-0.96] No significant gender differences in the outcomes The association between statin therapy and risk of cancer was not significant (OR TOTAL = 0.97, 0.89-1.05]) OR WOMEN = 0.91 0.76-1.08] OR MEN = 0.95 0.86-1.06] P HETEROGENEITY = 0.62 APPENDIX 4 8

HR Benefits of statins in people without established cardiovasc ular disease but with cardiovasc ular risk factors SECONDARY END POINTS: major coronary CONTROL: 1266/23946 (5.4%) STATIN: 966/23823 (4.1%) OR TOTAL = 0.70 0.61-0.81] OR WOMEN = 0.79 0.56-1.13] OR MEN = 0.72 0.61-0.86] P HETEROGENEITY = 0.65 major cerebrovascular CONTROL: 767/33 793 (2.3%) STATIN: 627/33 683 (1.9%) OR TOTAL = 0.81 0.71-0.93] OR WOMEN = 0.74 0.54-1.00] OR MEN = 0.77 0.44-1.36] P HETEROGENEITY = 0.90 APPENDIX 4 9

APPENDIX 4 10