National Diabetes Transition Audit, England and Wales

Similar documents
National Diabetes Insulin Pump Audit, England and Wales

National Diabetes Audit, Report 1: Care Processes and Treatment Targets

National Diabetes Audit, Report 1: Care Processes and Treatment Targets

National Diabetes Audit

National Diabetes Audit

National Diabetes Audit

National Diabetes Audit, Report 2a: Complications and Mortality (complications of diabetes) England and Wales 13 July 2017

National Paediatric Diabetes Audit

National Paediatric Diabetes Audit

National Chronic Kidney Disease Audit

National Diabetes Audit

The National Paediatric Diabetes Audit

Outcomes of diabetes care in England and Wales. A summary of findings from the National Diabetes Audit : Complications and Mortality reports

Diabetes. Ref HSCW 024

Number of people with diabetes

National Diabetes Inpatient Audit (NaDIA) 2016

Together for Health. Diabetes Delivery Plan Annual Report 2014

New NICE guidance: Changes in practice for multidisciplinary teams. Part 1: Type 1 diabetes in children and young people

Diabetes Public Meeting: Improving Diabetes Care in Hounslow

Survey Scottish Diabetes. Survey Monitoring Group

STATE OF THE NATION 2012

Map 6: Percentage of people in the National Diabetes Audit (NDA) with Type 1 diabetes receiving all nine key care processes by PCT

Information for people with diabetes. diabetes. glossary of. terms

NPDA RCPCH. National Paediatric Diabetes Audit. National Paediatric Diabetes Audit Report Care processes and outcomes

Shaping Diabetes Services in Southern Derbyshire. A vision for Diabetes Services For Southern Derbyshire CCG

STATE OF THE NATION. Challenges for 2015 and beyond. Wales

Scottish Diabetes Survey

Commissioning for Outcomes in Diabetes. Joanne Taylor Primary Care Commissioning Manager

OF THE ENGLAND IN THE BEST AREA FOUR TIMES MORE PEOPLE GET THE CHECKS THEY NEED THAN IN THE WORST

NAS NATIONAL AUDIT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA. Second National Audit of Schizophrenia What you need to know

POTENTIAL LINKAGES BETWEEN THE QUALITY AND OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK (QOF) AND THE NHS HEALTH CHECK

Improving Outcomes for People with Diabetes in Primary Care National Conference - Wednesday, 8 February 2017 Programme

How Good a Doctor? Physical Health Care in a Forensic Setting. Dr. Alan Cohen FRCGP

National Diabetes Foot Care Audit Third Annual Report

NHS GG&C Introduction of Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system

The management of adult diabetes services in the NHS

The National service framework (NSF) for diabetes

POSITION STATEMENT. May Early diagnosis of children with Type 1 diabetes. Key points

Expectation of Care. for Persons with Type 1 Diabetes. NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde. Managed Clinical Network for Diabetes

Diabetes Prevention Programme and National Diabetes Audit Pilot

Diabetic retinopathy is a SPOTLIGHT ON RETINAL SCREENING MEDICINE DIGEST

Six step guide to improving diabetes footcare. Putting feet. first

SERVICE SPECIFICATION 6 Conservative Management & End of Life Care

Members Sweet Meet Diabetes Update 6 May Sarita Naik Consultant in Diabetes and Endocrinology

NATIONAL BOWEL CANCER AUDIT The validity of cancer-specific mortality as a performance indicator in patients having major surgery for bowel cancer

Policy for the Provision of Insulin Pumps for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE. Type 2 diabetes: the management of type 2 diabetes (update)

POSITION STATEMENT. Diabetic eye screening April Key points

National Breast Cancer Audit next steps. Martin Lee

National Pregnancy in Diabetes Audit Report, England, Wales and the Isle of Man 12th October 2017

GOVERNING BODY REPORT

Together for Health A Diabetes Delivery Plan

DESIGNED TO TACKLE RENAL DISEASE IN WALES DRAFT 2 nd STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK for

NATIONAL BOWEL CANCER AUDIT The feasibility of reporting Patient Reported Outcome Measures as part of a national colorectal cancer audit

PLEASE REMEMBER TO BRING TO EACH APPOINTMENT

Best Practice Tariff can payment improve results? Dr Tabitha Randell Consultant in Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Diabetes and Kidney Disease: Time to Act. Your Guide to Diabetes and Kidney Disease

Diabetes Network

Smoking cessation interventions and services

Guideline scope Hypertension in adults (update)

Understanding lymphoma: the importance of patient data

The audit is managed by the Royal College of Psychiatrists in partnership with:

NHS Leeds CCG. Policy for the Funding of Flash Glucose Monitoring (FlashGM) in Paediatrics and Adults

Coronary heart disease and stroke

National Diabetes Treatment and Care Programme

New Clinical Solutions in Diabetes Care

14/15 Threshold 15/16 Points 15/16. Points. Retired Replaced by NM82/AF007. Replacement NO CHANGE

KEY QUESTIONS What outcome do you want to achieve for mental health in Scotland? What specific steps can be taken to achieve change?

Primary Care Commission Study Visit. 26 March 2015

Management of early chronic kidney disease

Scottish Diabetes Survey 2012

Integrated Community Diabetes Services (ICDS) GP Referral Guide Version 3 - October 2014

Diabetes is a lifelong, chronic. Survey on the quality of diabetes care in prison settings across the UK. Keith Booles

The National Quality Standards for Chronic Kidney Disease

National Audit of CKD in Primary Care

National Diabetes Foot Care Audit Hospital Admissions Report

6. CHILDREN, YOUNG PEOPLE AND THEIR FAMILIES

University College Hospital. Diabetes annual review

Networking for success: A burning platform in Berkshire West

National Children and Young People with Diabetes (NCYPD) Quality Programme. Self-Assessment Measures. May Reviewing, Supporting, Improving

NHS HOUNSLOW CCG GOVERNING BODY Cover Sheet. Date: 23 July 2013

National Diabetes Prevention Programme

QOF Indicator DM013:

FINANCE COMMITTEE DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND AGEING POPULATION INQUIRY SUBMISSION FROM NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS SOCIETY

Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.

Dual Diagnosis. Themed Review Report 2006/07 SHA Regional Reports East Midlands

Self-assessment checklist

Alcohol and Drug Commissioning Framework for Northern Ireland Consultation Questionnaire.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO QOF 2017/18 - ENGLAND CLINICAL

5 Diagnosis. Timely diagnosis. Back to contents

17/18 Threshold 18/19 Points 18/19. Points NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE

British Association of Stroke Physicians Strategy 2017 to 2020

Diabetes in Pregnancy Network: Scoping survey March 2013

2. Quality and Outcomes Framework: new NICE recommendations

PRIMARY CARE CO-COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE 8 SEPTEMBER 2015

Diabetes (DIA) Measures Document

WHERE NEXT FOR CANCER SERVICES IN NORTHERN IRELAND? AN EVALUATION OF PRIORITIES TO IMPROVE PATIENT CARE

Summary of 2011/12 QOF indicator changes, points and thresholds

Transcription:

National Diabetes Transition Audit, 2011-2017 England and Wales

Prepared in collaboration with: The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). The National Diabetes Audit (NDA) is part of the National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme (NCAPOP) which is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) and funded by NHS England. HQIP is led by a consortium of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, the Royal College of Nursing and National Voices. Its aim is to promote quality improvement, and in particular to increase the impact that clinical audit has on healthcare quality in England and Wales. HQIP holds the contract to manage and develop the NCAPOP Programme, comprising more than 30 clinical audits that cover care provided to people with a wide range of medical, surgical and mental health conditions. The programme is funded by NHS England, the Welsh Government and, with some individual audits, also funded by the Health Department of the Scottish Government, DHSSPS Northern Ireland and the Channel Islands. NHS Digital is the new name for the Health and Social Care Information Centre. NHS Digital managed the publication of the 2011-2017 National Diabetes Transition Audit Report and also manage the National Diabetes Audit. Diabetes UK is the largest organisation in the UK working for people with diabetes, funding research, campaigning and helping people live with the condition. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health manage the National Paediatric Diabetes Audit and support the development and production of the National Diabetes Transition Audit (NDTA) report. 2019 Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) 2

Why is Transition from Paediatric to Adult Care Important? Diabetes is a very difficult condition to manage. From the point of diagnosis onwards, diabetes has a major impact on the life of a young person, placing an enormous 24/7 burden on them and their family or carers. Supporting lifelong management of the condition is essential in achieving the most positive outcomes for the individual. Patients making the transition from childhood to adulthood are particularly at risk of disruption in care, with both short and long-term health effects. It is therefore very important that the handover of care from paediatric to adult services defends against this and does not intensify the risk. Transitional care needs collaborative support from medical, educational and psychological services. Engagement between paediatric and young adult services to provide continuity of care, and give young adults confidence to continue to manage their diabetes is pivotal. Falling short of this can lead to serious and lasting consequences, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. 3

Introduction The National Diabetes Transition Audit (NDTA) links datasets from the adult and paediatric national diabetes audits. The NDTA has been designed to audit care provision during the period when young people with diabetes move from paediatric to adult based clinical care. A working group comprises the clinical leads and audit managers for both the National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and the National Paediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA), analysts from NHS Digital, and representation from Diabetes UK. The working group has designed, developed and delivered the NDTA according to the requirements and methodology set out overleaf. The NDTA measures changes in glycaemic control and care provision across the period of transition. It signals priorities for improvement and provides a framework for monitoring the impact of improvement action plans. 4

Introduction This is the second published report for the NDTA. This report has linked data from the NPDA and NDA for the audit periods 2011-12 to 2016-17. The NDTA focusses on the large number of young people with Type 1 diabetes, with some information on the few with Type 2 diabetes. The first NDTA report can be found here: https://digital.nhs.uk/dataand-information/publications/statistical/national-diabetes-audit/nationaldiabetes-transition-audit-2003-2014 The report aims to answer the following audit questions: 1. Is the transition from paediatric to adult care associated with changes in care process completion rates? 2. Is the transition from paediatric to adult care associated with a change in treatment target achievements? 3. Is the transition from paediatric to adult care associated with changes in rates of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)? 5

Key Findings It is of concern that, on average, young people with Type 1 diabetes experience deteriorations in annual care process completion, achievement of treatment targets and higher rates of DKA while transitioning from paediatric to adult services. However, this overall picture is the sum of considerable local service variation. Whereas most services demonstrate these adverse trends a large number show the opposite. This varies between measures, as is illustrated on slides 16, 21 and 26 of this report. 6

Recommendations Clinical Commissioning Groups and Local Health Boards: 1. Look at how your local paediatric and adult services compare with the others in England and Wales. If required, support them to achieve improvements in the transition of young people from paediatric to adult diabetes services. Specialist Services: 2. Adult and Paediatric Services i. Collaboratively compare yourselves to peer services. ii. Consider whether improvements may be accelerated through participation in the RCPCH and NDA Quality Improvement collaborative programmes. 7

National Diabetes Transition Audit 2011-2017 Identifying young people with continuous records through transition to adult care 8

Definition of Transition The NDTA has linked data for the NPDA from 2011-12 to 2015-16 with NDA data from 2011-12 to 2016-17. Children and young people have been tracked from the NPDA dataset into the NDA dataset. This report uses the date of transition out of paediatric services as recorded by the NPDA (since 2011-12) to define the start of the transition to adult care. This differs from the definition used in the first NDTA report where the final year a patient appeared in the NPDA data was used to define their transition year. (Please see the methodology section of this report for further information.) Patients are included in the analysis only if they appear in the NDA in the following year. This is to ensure comparisons can be made to the NDA. Due to poor participation in some years of NDA, some people in NPDA have been excluded from the analysis. 4,530 type 1 patients left paediatric care during the period, of which 3,800 were recorded in NDA the following year, leaving 730 excluded from analysis. 155 type 2 patients left paediatric care, 120 were captured in NDA, with 30 excluded from analysis*. 65 patients with an other or unknown diabetes type left paediatric care, with 30 recorded in NDA and 35 excluded from analysis. Although participation in NDA was poor in some years, in 2016-17 it was near complete at 95 per cent. 1,595 patients left paediatric care during 2015-16, of which 95 per cent (1510) were recorded in NDA in 2016-17. This suggests that there was little change in attendance at clinics on the transition from paediatric to adult care. * Totals may not sum due to rounding 9

Number of people Age at Transition to Adult Care About 65 per cent of transitions occur at ages 17 and 18 years old. Over 25 per cent of people transition at ages 15 and 16. Over 5 per cent transition at age 19 to 20. Figure 1: Age of transition of young people included in NDTA, Type 1 diabetes, 2011-2017, England and Wales 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Age, in years at transition 10

Analysis in this report Using the method described on page nine we were able to establish a transition cohort of 3,800 individuals with type 1 diabetes, and 120 with type 2 diabetes. As with the first NDTA report, this report focusses on people with type 1 diabetes. The small number of people with type 2 transitioning makes analysis of this cohort unreliable. Limited analysis of people with type 2 diabetes is in the supporting data tables accompanying this report, but this should be treated with extreme caution. For most measures in this report, performance is reported for the: o Year Before Transition analysis of the NPDA for the audit year before transition. o Transition Year analysis using combined NPDA and NDA data. o Post Transition Year analysis of the NDA in the year following transition. o 2 nd Year Post Transition analysis of the NDA in the second year following transition. o 3 rd Year Post Transition analysis of the NDA in the third year following 11 transition.

National Diabetes Transition Audit 2011-2017 What percentage of young people registered with Type 1 diabetes received the NICE key processes of diabetes care? 12

Care Processes NICE recommends that all people with diabetes aged 12 years and over should receive each of the nine care processes 1,2,3 and attend a structured education program when diagnosed. NPDA, however, does not include Serum Cholesterol and Serum Creatinine so this report is restricted to the remaining seven care processes. Nine Annual Care Processes for all people with diabetes aged 12 and over Responsibility of Diabetes Care providers (included in the NDA 8 Care Processes) 1. HbA1c (blood test for glucose control) 2. Blood Pressure (measurement for cardiovascular risk) 3. Serum Cholesterol (blood test for cardiovascular risk) 4. Serum Creatinine (blood test for kidney function) 5. Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (urine test for kidney function) 6. Foot Risk Surveillance (foot examination for foot ulcer risk) 7. Body Mass Index (measurement for cardiovascular risk) 8. Smoking History (question for cardiovascular risk) Responsibility of NHS Diabetes Eye Screening (screening register drawn from practices) 9. Digital Retinal Screening (photographic eye test for eye risk) 1, 2, 3. Please see full list of footnotes in the definitions and footnote section. 13

Care Processes During the year of transition to adult care the completion rate of essential care processes were similar or better than the year before transition. Generally there was a 5 to 15 per cent reduction in completion of care processes in the 1st year following transition to adult care which did not improve in the 2nd or 3rd year. Figure 2: Ratios of care process completion before and after transition to adult care, Type 1 diabetes, 2011-2017 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Year Before Transition - Paediatric Service (base = 3615) Transition Year - Paediatric or Adult Service (base = 3800) Post Transition Year - Adult Service (base = 3800) 2nd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 2220) 3rd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 1255) 10% 0% HbA1c Blood Pressure Urine Albumin Creatine Ratio Foot Retinopathy Smoking BMI 14

Care Processes It is noted that delivery of care processes are financially incentivised in Paediatric diabetes services (via the paediatric diabetes best practice tariff) and in adult diabetes services that are delivered in primary care. Adult secondary care diabetes services are the only environment in which delivery of care processes are not financially incentivised, and poorer delivery post transition may well reflect this. However, the lack of financial incentives may result in poor recording, rather than poor delivery, of care processes, or may be a combination of both. 15

Care Processes variation by unit/region The national averages conceal large variation at service level in the completion rates of care processes following transition from paediatric to adult care. Figure 3: Variation, by Paediatric Unit*, in the Change of Care Process Achievement on Transition to Adult Care, Type 1 diabetes, 2011-17 Greater completeness after transition Greater completeness before transition *Only included in this figure are units with at least 18 patients transitioning during the period. Difference in achievement between the Year Before Transition and the Year After Transition. 16

Care Processes Comment In general, completion of care processes falls after transition from paediatric to adult services. Overall, during the year of transition care, care process completion rates either improved or stayed the same as that in the year pre-transition. There were, however, substantial differences between services; appreciable improvements during transition in some even though they were outnumbered by those with deteriorations in others. It is hoped that better understanding of the causes of this variation may help drive improvement. The NDTA Quality Improvement Collaborative, starting in early 2019, will support this. 17

National Diabetes Transition Audit 2011-2017 What percentage of young people registered with Type 1 diabetes were the NICE treatment targets for diabetes care achieved? 18

Treatment Target NICE recommends a treatment target of 48mmol/mol for HbA1c (glucose control) in young people with diabetes. Achieving target HbA1c reduces the risk of all diabetic complications. The NICE guidance changed in 2015 which was during the data period considered for this report. For the purposes of this report the target for HbA1c for adults and paediatrics is set as <=58 mmol/mol which was the NICE guidance before 2015. 19

Treatment Target Overall the percentage of young people achieving a target HbA1c of <=58mmol/mol fell post transition to adult care. 3 years after moving from paediatric to young adult services 10% fewer young people achieved this target. Figure 4: Proportions meeting HbA1c target pre- and post-transition to adult care, Type 1 diabetes, 2011-2017 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Year Before Transition - Paediatric Service (base = 3065) Transition Year - Paediatric or Adult Service (base = 3490) Post Transition Year - Adult Service (base = 2900) 2nd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 1700) 3rd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 970) 20

Treatment Target variation by unit Although the overall rate of HbA1c<=58mmol/mol target achievement is better pre transition to adult care, as for care processes, this is not universal. There is appreciable variability with some centres achieving better blood glucose control post transition. Figure 5: Variation, by Paediatric Unit, in the change in HbA1c Treatment Target Achievement on Transition to Adult Care, Type 1 diabetes, 2011-17 Greater target achievement after transition Greater target achievement before transition *Only included in this figure are units with at least 18 patients transitioning during the period. Difference in achievement between the Year Before Transition and the Year After Transition. 21

Treatment Target Comment There is a need for Paediatric and Young Adult services to address the overall decline in target blood glucose control achievement rates post transition to adult care. But deterioration during transition is not universal. Better understanding of the causes of the variation may help drive improvement. The NDTA Quality Improvement Collaborative starting in early 2019 will support this. It is possible that important factors include: Paediatric and adult services working together to ensure key messages are maintained during transition. Maintaining engagement of young people during transition and onwards into adult life. 22

National Diabetes Transition Audit 2011-2017 How were cardiovascular risk factors managed in young people with type 1 diabetes during transition to adult care? 23

Risk Factors Blood pressure and raised urinary albumin should be monitored as they identify people at increased risk of complications such as kidney and cardiovascular disease: Monitoring of blood pressure allows early detection of hypertension amenable to treatment that can reduce the risk of vascular complications and reduce the progression of eye disease and kidney failure. The Blood pressure threshold for adult and paediatrics is defined as <140/80 mmhg Measuring Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio (UACR) identifies people with increased risk of kidney and cardiovascular disease. Intensive glucose and blood pressure management can prevent progression. The upper limit for UACR is 2.5mg/mmol in males and 3.5mg/mmol in females 24

Risk Factors There is a reduction in young people achieving target blood pressure post transition to adult care. There is little change in microalbuminuria rates post transition. The finding that ~20% of young people have blood pressure >140/80 pre transition is concerning. Figure 6: Ratios of thresholds met pre- & post-transition to adult care, Type 1 diabetes, 2011-2017 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Year Before Transition - Paediatric Service (base = 2855/1605) Transition Year - Paediatric or Adult Service (base = 3310/1825) Post Transition Year - Adult Service (base = 3130/960) 2nd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 1845/490) 3rd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 1055/215) 10% 0% Blood Pressure Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio 25

Risk Factors variation by unit As for HbA1c, the national average represents the summation of very diverse local patterns Figure 7: Variation, by Paediatric Unit*, in the Risk Factor Target Achievement on Transition to Adult Care Greater target achievement after transition Greater target achievement before transition *Only included in this figure are units with at least 18 patients transitioning during the period. Difference in achievement between the Year Before Transition and the Year After Transition. 26

Risk Factors Comment The important risk factor, microalbuminuria (raised UACR) is present in over 10% of young people with Type 1 diabetes both before and after transition to adult care. Targeted efforts to control blood glucose and blood pressure can reduce this risk. NDTA does not currently measure type of insulin treatment or blood pressure interventions but it may going forward and meantime the poor overall post-transition rate of UACR check is a cause for concern. 27

National Diabetes Transition Audit 2011-2017 Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) Hospital Inpatient Admissions 28

DKA Hospital Inpatient Admissions Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a potentially life-threatening complication of predominantly Type 1 diabetes that occurs when insulin levels become very low. As a result of the lack of insulin the body is unable to store or use blood sugar (glucose) which rises uncontrollably. Fat is broken down to use as an alternative energy source but in an uncontrolled fashion. This causes a build-up of potentially harmful, acidic, ketones. The high glucose and ketone levels lead to excessive urination, vomiting, dehydration, low blood pressure and collapse/coma. Without treatment DKA is fatal. 29

DKA Hospital Inpatient Admissions The year after transition to adult care (and the year of transition) more people admitted for DKA than during the year before transition. The DKA rates during the second and third year following transfer show no difference to the year before, during or after transfer. This highlights the vulnerability of the transition period. Figure 8: Percentage of people admitted to hospital* with a diagnosis of DKA, Type 1 diabetes, 2011-2017 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Year Before Transition - Paediatric Service (base = 3545) Transition Year - Paediatric or Adult Service (base = 3800) Post Transition Year - Adult Service (base = 3800) 2nd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 2360) 3rd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 1350) *Irrespective of the number of times admitted during the period. 30

National Diabetes Transition Audit 2011-2017 Insulin Pumps 31

People on Insulin Pump This section considers any difference in achievement of target glucose control between those people using an insulin pump in the transition year and those not. A patient was defined as using an insulin pump during the transition year if they were recorded as doing so in the NPDA. 435 people, about 12 per cent, were identified as using an insulin pump in their transition year. 32

Insulin Pump HbA1c Care Process The number of people using an insulin pump is relatively small. Care process completion before and during and after transition to adult care is higher for people on pump than not on pump. The years before and during transition see people on pump achieving a higher completion rate. Rates are not different after transfer. Figure 9: Proportions of all care processes met pre- and post-transition to adult care, by insulin pump use, 2011-2017 100% 80% 60% 40% Pump Non-Pump 20% 0% Year Before Transition - Paediatric Service (base = 420/2495) Transition Year - Paediatric or Adult Service (base = 435/2690) Post Transition Year - Adult Service (base = 435/2690) 2nd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 130/1445) 3rd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 40/565) 33

Insulin Pump HbA1c Treatment Target Within each year, the HbA1c Treatment Target achievement is no different between those on pump and not on pump. The achievement between years is not discernibly different for people on insulin pump. Analysis is limited by the small numbers available. Figure 10: Proportions achieving HbA1c target pre- and post-transition to adult care, by insulin pump use, 2011-2017 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% Pump Non-Pump 10% 5% 0% Year Before Transition - Paediatric Service (base = 345/2095) Transition Year - Paediatric or Adult Service (base = 435/2420) Post Transition Year - Adult Service (base = 355/2050) 2nd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 110/1105) 3rd Year Post Transition - Adult Service (base = 30/440) 34

National Diabetes Transition Audit 2011-2017 Methodology and data quality 35

Methodology Time Period Covered The National Paediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA) years covered are 2011-12 to 2015-16. Audit year 2010-11 is included in the analysis to provide a pre-transition comparison for people who transitioned in 2011-12. The National Diabetes Audit (NDA) years covered are 2011-12 to 2016-17. As 2016-17 was the latest NDA audit year available, the latest year of NPDA included for one-year follow-up is 2015-16, for two-year follow-up is 2014-15, and for three-year follow-up is 2013-14. This is why there is a decreasing sample size with increasing follow-up period. 36

Methodology Time Period Covered For most measures in this report, performance is reported for the: o o o o o Year Before Transition Analysis of the NPDA for the audit year before transition. Transition Year analysis using combined NPDA and NDA data. Post Transition Year analysis of the NDA in the year following transition. 2 nd Year Post Transition analysis of the NDA in the second year following transition. 3 rd Year Post Transition analysis of the NDA in the third year following transition. The data used spans over seven years of diabetes care. For both the NPDA and NDA, national figures for care process and treatment target achievements have improved over that time, therefore the results reported for overall care process and treatment target achievement may not reflect current national figures, and this should be borne in mind when comparing to recently published national reports. 37

Methodology - Definition of Transition Since 2011-12 the NPDA has recorded the date of transition out of paediatric services. This is the date used for this report. Patients are included in the analysis only if they appear in the NDA in the following year. This is to ensure there is something to compare with in the adult audit. Please note that this differs from the definition used in the first NDTA report. Some patients were recorded as having transitioned in more than one NPDA audit year. In these instances the latest date was used. Due to poor participation in some years of NDA, some people in NPDA have been excluded from the analysis. 4,530 type 1 patients left paediatric care during the period, of which 3,800 were recorded in NDA the following year, leaving 730 excluded from analysis. 155 type 2 patients left paediatric care, 120 were captured in NDA, with 30 excluded from analysis*. 65 patients with an other or unknown diabetes type left paediatric care, with 30 recorded in NDA and 35 excluded from analysis. * Totals may not sum due to rounding 38

Methodology Previous Definition of Transition For the previous, and first, transition report, we used the point at which a person disappeared from the NPDA as a definition that they had transitioned, however it does not necessarily mean that they have undergone a planned transition move to adult services, but used as the best proxy that we had and defined the process of patients moving from paediatric to young adult based care. We did not know the exact date a person transitioned during the defined year that they moved out of paediatric care. Therefore, they may not have received a complete year of care prior to transition and care process rates may not have been complete. The more precise definition used this year provides more reassurance with regards to transition, but it is reassuring to note that many of the trends identified in the first report are mirrored in the more accurate data. 39

Methodology Diabetes Type For a small number of people, the diabetes type recorded in NPDA was different to that recorded in NDA. For this report we have given preference to the NPDA recorded diabetes type. Where the diabetes type was recorded as unknown in NPDA we have taken that recorded in NDA. This was for a small number of people. As with the first NDTA report, this report focusses on people with type 1 diabetes. This gives a cohort of 3,800 people. The small number of people with type 2 transitioning (120 people) makes analysis of this cohort unreliable. 40

Methodology Biometric levels Target: HbA1c Applied to both paediatric and adults: HbA1c values 7.5% (equivalent to 58 mmol/mol) Risk Factor: Blood Pressure Blood pressure threshold for adults and paediatrics: Below 140/80 mmhg In children blood pressure is related to age and growth, however it is expected that all children have a blood pressure below this threshold. Risk factor: Kidney Kidney threshold for paediatric: Albumin/creatinine ratio: Less than or equal to 2.5 mg/mmol (male) Less than or equal to 3.5 mg/mmol (female) Kidney thresholds for adult: Albumin/creatinine ratio: Less than or equal to 2.5 mg/mmol (male) or 3.5 mg/mmol (female) Albumin concentration: Less than or equal to 20mg/L Albumin excretion (overnight): Less than or equal to 20µg/min Albumin excretion (24 hours): Less than or equal to 30mg/24h 41

Methodology - DKA DKA Hospital Inpatient Admissions. Selected hospital inpatient data from the HES system was linked to the data on transition: Inpatient data was used from 2010-11 to 2017-18 (the final year of which was provisional data). The data from HES was filtered on: Episodes with a diagnosis of DKA in any position. Finished admission episodes of inpatient care. 42

Methodology Insulin Pumps A patient was defined as using an insulin pump during the transition year if they were recorded as doing so in the NPDA. 435 people, about 12%, were identified as using an insulin pump in their transition year. Insulin pump data does not have full coverage in NDA over the years analysed in this report, and within the years it has been collected. 43

Methodology Disclosure Control The standard NDA disclosure control method has been used for this report. All counts of people are rounded to the nearest 5, unless the number is 1 to 7, in which case it is rounded to 5. Rounded numbers are used to calculate percentages. Median and centile calculations are not rounded. 44

National Diabetes Transition Audit 2011-2017 Definitions, footnotes, data sources and further reading 45

Definitions Diabetes Is a condition where the amount of glucose in the blood is too high because the pancreas doesn t produce enough insulin. Insulin is a hormone produced by the pancreas that allows glucose to be used as a body fuel and other nutrients to be used as building blocks. There are two main types of diabetes: Type 1 diabetes (no insulin); Type 2 diabetes (insufficient insulin). Care Processes (NICE recommends all of these at least once a year) Blood Pressure a measurement of the force driving the blood through the arteries. Blood pressure readings contain two figures, e.g.130/80. The first is known as the systolic pressure which is produced when the heart contracts. The second is the diastolic pressure which is when the heart relaxes to refill with blood. BMI measurement Body Mass Index calculated from weight and height to classify under, normal and over-weight. Serum creatinine this blood test is used as measure kidney function. Urinary albumin this urine test detects the earliest stages of kidney disease. Cholesterol this blood test measures a type of fat that can damage blood vessels. Foot check this examination checks the blood supply and sensation (feeling) in the feet. Loss of either is an indicator of risk of foot disease. Smoking Status this records whether the person is a smoker. Smoking increases the diabetic risk for heart attacks and stroke. HbA1c this is a blood test of average blood glucose levels during the previous two to three months. 46

Definitions Specialist Service This is a service (often hospital based but sometimes delivered in a community setting) which includes diabetes specialists working in multidisciplinary teams. These teams usually comprise physicians (Diabetologists), Diabetes Specialist nurses and dieticians; it may also include clinical psychologists. Treatment Targets (NICE defines target levels to reduce risks of complications for people with diabetes) HbA1c - the closer this is to normal (less than 42mmol/mol) the lower is the risk of all long term complications of diabetes Blood Pressure high levels are a risk for heart attacks and strokes; they also drive progression of eye and kidney disease 47

Footnotes 1. See methodology and data quality section in this report for information regarding point of transition and DKA admissions 2. NICE recommended care processes http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/conditions-anddiseases/diabetes-and-other-endocrinal--nutritional-and-metabolic-conditions/diabetes 3. National Service Framework (NSF) for Diabetes https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-service-framework-diabetes NICE Clinical Guidelines GN17: Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng17 NICE Clinical Guidelines NG28: Type 2 diabetes in adults: management http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28 NICE Diabetes in Adults Quality Standard http://guidance.nice.org.uk/qs6 4. NICE Clinical Guidance NG18: Diabetes in children and young people https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/gid-cgwaver118 48

Additional information The following documents are available alongside this report, Supporting data in Excel Powerpoint version of this report Service level information for benchmarking and quality improvement purposes. 49

National Diabetes Transition Audit 2011-2017 Published by NHS Digital Part of the Government Statistical Service For further information digital.nhs.uk 0300 303 5678 enquiries@nhsdigital.nhs.uk 2019 Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) 50